Cameron Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interview, the facility failed to protect residents from resident abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for Residents. The deficient practice put five (5) of five (5) Residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. Resident Identifiers #32, #52, #14, #49, #36, and #24. Facility census: 52. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 6:53 PM on 08/13/24. The facility submitted their first abatement plan of correction (POC) at 7:28 PM on 08/13/24. The POC was accepted by the state agency at 7:47 PM on 08/13/22. After observation of the implementation of the abatement POC, the IJ was abated at 3:30 PM on 08/14/24. The IJ started on 08/13/24 and ended on 08/14/24. The facility's approved abatement POC consisted of the following: Correction action for area of concern- - Education to all staff in building at current time with remaining education to all staff 8/14 - education will be on 1:1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide a comfortable home like environment in the communal shower room. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #42. Facility census: 54.Findings Include:a) Communal Shower RoomDuring the initial interview on 03/02/26 at 12:40 PM, Resident #42 stated, The shower room is cold. That is why I wash myself off at the sink a lot of days.An observation on 03/02/26 at 1:00 PM, revealed the shower room felt cool. There was no thermometer in the shower room to get the actual temperature.A further observation of the communal shower room at 1:05 PM, with The Director of Maintenance (DOM), confirmed the room felt cool and noted there was no thermometer to get the actual temperature. The DOM took the room temperature with the water temperature thermometer, which read 71 degrees Fahrenheit. The State Agency (SA) asked if he had a wall thermometer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases, to help prevent cross-contamination and infections including Covid-19 in regard to, follow CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines for use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to wound care for a resident on (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) and provide appropriate wound cere. The facility also failed to ensure the laundry area had bags of trash and dirty laundry in receptacles. These failed practices had the potential to affect every resident currently residing in the facility. Resident identifier:# 2. Facility census: 54. Findings included: a) Resident #2A record review revealed Resident #8 was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to wound care.On 03/02/26 at 2:00 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #35 with assistance from Nurse Aide (NA) #56 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical assessments regarding the frequency of falls were completed accurately.This deficiency was identified in one (1) out of two (2) records reviewed. Resident identifier: #6. Facility census: 54. Findings include:a) Resident #6Review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for Minimum Data Sheets (MDS) Section J1800 reads in part, Any falls since admission/entry or reentry or prior assessment, whichever is more recent. Section: J1800 of the MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/18/2025 revealed the MDS registered nurse ( RN) marked the answer as (no) to the question Any falls since admission/entry or reentry or prior assessment, whichever is more recent. Record review revealed Resident #6 had fallen on 05/12/25, 06/07/25, 06/08/25. During an interview on 03/03/26 at around 11:30 AM with MDS RN #27, the RN reviewed observations and reported, I may have missed these, as they should have been answered yes. It could be an error on my end. I will go back and review and return to verify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview and record review the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to dependent residents during meal times. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (3) three residents reviewed for ADL care during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #11. Facility census: 54.Findings Include:a) Resident #11During the initial interview on 03/02/26 at 12:35 PM, Resident #11 stated, About a week ago, I asked to have my brief changed about 15 minutes before supper and was told by the nurse aide that I would have to wait until after the meal.A record review on 03/04/26 at 9:30 AM, revealed an ADL care plan for Resident #11 that had an intervention that read as follows:Toileting Hygiene: Totally dependent of 1, 1 helper does all the effort. Resident does none of the effort.During the Resident Council meeting with the State Agency (SA) on 03/03/26 at 10:15 AM, The Resident Council as a whole said they are being told they have to wait until after meals to be changed or taken to the restroom.During an interview on 03/04/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in-accordance with professional standard of practice in regards to adverse drug consequence, Adverse consequence is a broad term referring to unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have, such as impairment or decline in an individual's mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status. The resident had not yet experienced side effects from the medication. This was true for one (1) of five (5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier #9. Facility census: 54.Findings included:a) Resident #9Adverse consequence is a broad term referring to unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have, such as impairment or decline in an individual's mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status. The resident had not yet experienced side effects from the medication. A review for Unnecessary Medication regarding Resident #9 identified that Acetaminophen was added to the drug allergy list on the admission date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews Medication Regimen review (MRR) failed to evaluate and report on the potential adverse consequences for a resident to receive a medication in which they had a listed drug allergy. This was true for one (1) of five (5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier #9. Facility census: 55.Findings included:a) Resident #9A review for Unnecessary Medication regarding Resident #9 identified that Acetaminophen was added to the drug allergy list on the admission date of 12/24/25.Continued medical record review revealed an order: Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 325 MG (Acetaminophen): Give 650 mg by mouth every four hours as needed for Pain. Order date: 02/02/26.A review of Resident #9's medication administration record found Acetaminophen 650 mg was given on 02/20/26, 02/21/26 and 03/04/26.Subsequent review of Resident #9's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for February 2026 revealed that Acetaminophen was not noted as an Adverse Consequence.On 03/04/26 at approximately 10:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified that neither the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to provide the housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, by not maintaining the water temperature at a comfortable level for residents, and not ensuring that the shower rooms, and residents bathrooms were free of any accumulated dirt, grime, or other substances, and foul odors. Resident Identifiers: #4, #10, and #13. Facility Census:52. The findings included: a) Resident #4: During an interview with Resident #4 on 08/12/24 at 1:22 PM, she stated that the water was always cold when she was given a shower. An inspection of the resident's hand sink revealed no hot water, even after the water was left running for over three minutes. NA #8 confirmed that water temperature was cold. b) Resident #10 During an inspection of Resident #10's bathroom on 08/12/24 at 1:44 PM, a black substance was noted between the floor tiles. NA #8 responded to this surveyor's request and confirmed the black substance. She stated that the floor needed to be cleaned. c) Resident #13 An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the facility nursing staff posting was completed for the day shift. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the revisit survey. Facility Census: 53 Findings include: On 10/02/24 at approximately 9:32 AM a surveyor observed the Nursing staffing sheet hung at the end of C - Hall was not completed for the Day shift. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #40 confirmed the staffing sheet should have been completed. The LPN stated, I'm doing it now we have been passing meds. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was completed on 10/02/24 at 12:00PM. The interview confirmed the staffing sheet should have been completed at the beginning of day shift. Record review on 10/02/24 of the facility's policy #: NS 1091-01 under Procedure it stated, The facility will post the nurse staffing data daily at the beginning for each shift.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired food items. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who were served food from the kitchen. Facility census: 52. Findings included: a) Initial Tour of Kitchen During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 08/12/2024 at 11:30 AM, with the Dietary Manager revealed One (1) unopened box of muffin mix found to have an expiration date of 07/04/23, stamped on the container by the manufacturer. The Dietary Manager stated This should have been thrown out and immediately disposed of muffin mix. Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired food items. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who are served food from the kitchen. Facility census: 52. Findings included: A) Initial Tour of Kitchen with Dietary Manager My Observations during the initial tour of the kitchen, on 08/12/2024 at 11:30 AM, revealed: One unopened box of muffin mix found to have an expiration date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews with facility staff, and a review of facility policy and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices that controlled, or prevented, the spread of infection. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility Census: 52. Findings included: a) Water Management During facility record review of the water management, it was revealed that the facility did not have a Water Management Plan, or a water flow diagram which identified the facility's water systems for which Legionella control measures were needed. No documentation was maintained, or provided, describing facility's control practices to prevent growth of water borne pathogens. b) Laundry Services On 08/14/24 at 2:16 PM an inspection of the soiled laundry room, accompanied by Director of Plant Maintenance (DPM) #13 observed that the door between the soiled laundry room and clean laundry room was held open by a box of detergent. The clean laundry room contained a rack of uncovered clean clothing in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$131,164 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $131,164 — penalty dated 2024-08-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $544K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV