Willow Tree Healthcare Center
1263 South George Street, Charles Town, WV 25414 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (304) 725-6575 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-22)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 14.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.4% | 7.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 4.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.2% | 15.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.3% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.0% | 22.1% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.1% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 79.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.5% | 11.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.76 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.65 | 1.84 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.4%CMS range 36.7–65.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.6–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.6–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 101.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were not neglected. The facility failed to follow physician's orders in transferring resident. This caused actual harm to the resident by causing bruises to his right elbow, right hand, right wrist, and right forearm. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for neglect. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census: 103. Findings included: On 03/20/24 the facility reported an incident to all required entities. According to the reportable, Resident #1 was observed to have bruising of unknown origin. Resident #1 is a [AGE] year-old male on hospice with multiple diagnoses including: dementia, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, right sided hemiparesis with flaccidity. The resident lacked the capacity to make medical decisions. The resident was receiving aspirin 325 milligrams of aspirin (MG) daily due to a history of stroke. A side effect of aspirin therapy is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse and neglect, as evidenced by the facility staff failing to accommodate the resident's request for a snack. Resident Identifiers: Resident #31. Facility Census: 98.Findings Includea) Resident #31Record review revealed that Resident #31 was diagnosed with the following:Type II Diabetes Mellitus with HyperglycemiaHemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left non-dominant side.Acquired absence of left leg above the kneeAcquired absence of right leg above the kneeChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Dysphagia following Cerebral InfarctionGastrointestinal Hemorrhage UnspecifiedMuscle Weakness (Generalized)Unspecified Lack of Coordination Resident #31 has capacity and has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. During an interview with Resident #31 on 10/28/25 at approximately 9:28 AM, resident stated that on the night of 10/16/25, he was not feeling well and had asked Nursing Aide (NA) #36 for something to eat because he was not feeling well.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. Resident Identifier: #31. Facility Census: 98.Findings Include Ra) Resident #31Record review revealed that Resident #31 was diagnosed with Type II Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia. The resident had been prescribed Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 38 units subcutaneously at bedtime for diabetes.During an interview with Resident #31 on 10/28/25 at approximately 9:28 AM, resident stated that on the night of 10/16/25, he was not feeling well and had asked Nursing Aide (NA) #36 for something to eat because he was not feeling well. Resident #31 stated that NA #36 had responded, saying, There are no sandwiches, shut up and go to sleep! Resident #31 stated that he was very upset about what had happened. Resident #31 also noted that after his complaint, a nurse and NA #36 came into his room, and NA #36 denied saying that to him.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received person-centered care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident Identifiers: Resident #12 and #31. Facility census:98Findings Include The resident had repeated episodes of nausea and vomiting over a period of over ten (10) days, and the facility failed to refer the resident to the hospital for evaluation. The resident was finally transferred to the hospital due to a family member's insistence. At the hospital, he was treated for acute metabolic encephalopathy. Acute kidney injury, aspiration pneumonia, and a UTI.a) Resident #12Resident #12 lacks capacity and has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1.An attempt was made to contact the residents' Power of Attorney (POA), but the call went unanswered.Record review on 10/27/25 at 3:10 PM revealed that Resident #12 was diagnosed with:Peripheral Vascular Disease, UnspecifiedDiabetes Mellitus due to underlying condition with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment relating to maintenance services necessary to maintain a comfortable interior for resident room numbers 112, 119, 121, 123, 124, and 126, pest control for room #'s 118, 121,123,124, and 126 and Low to no water pressure in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. These failed practices were random opportunities for discovery. Census 98. Findings include:a) Maintenance Services:Upon survey entrance on 07/21/25 at 1:30PM, the following issues were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom areas: - approximate1/2-inch-long chip in the wood on the bathroom door near the handle- black scuff marks on backside of bathroom door- Rust spots across the white wall heater on the wall behind the toiletUpon survey entrance on 07/21/25 at 1:35 PM, the following issues were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom areas:- Cracks in caulking around the sink - Black scuffmarks on the back side of bathroom door- Black scuff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for safe food service. This practice had the ability to affect all Residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 98. During a Dining Room Observation on 07/21/2025 at 12:45 PM, Nurse Aide(NA), #70 was observed touching multiple surfaces while setting up Resident #77's tray and then feeding him without washing hands or using hand sanitizer. In an interview with NA #70 on 07/21/25 at 12:55 PM, she acknowledged she did not wash or sanitize her hands after touching multiple surfaces before setting up Resident #70's tray and then feeding him. An observation on 07/24/25 at 11:30 AM, found: the walk-in freezer with sausage patties , pancakes, and Salisbury steak patties open to air. 3 ice cream cups on the floor. During an interview with the Dietary Manager 07/24/25 at 1:12 PM she verified the food was open to air. She also verified the ice cream cups on the floor and at this time placed the ice cream cups back in the box.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to, resident hand washing, medical equipment, and meal tray place This practice had the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility census: 98.Findings included: a) An observation on 07/21/25 at 12:20 PM of the dining room lunch meal tray pass found the staff using three (3) trays to pass meals. Staff would pass lunch to a resident. Return to the service line and pass the tray down through the staff to the stream table to be used for the next resident without cleaning the tray. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #9 she stated that this is the practice serving meals in the dining room. She verified the service tray is never cleaned between residents. b) On 07/22/25 between the hours of 7:45 AM and 7:55 AM., observation revealed Employee #89…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the call system was accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations within the resident's room. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers #23, and #50. Facility Census: 98. Findings include:a) Resident #23On 07/21/25 at 12:35 PM upon the facility entrance and interview with Resident #23, it was observed that Resident #23 was sitting on the side of his bed, and the call light was on the floor approximately 3 feet away from him. The resident walks with a walker and could not reach his call light. b) Resident #50On 07/22/25 at 2:35 PM, it was observed that Resident #50 asked surveyor to get a nurse for her roommate in bed #1 but her call light was not within reach. She was sitting on the right side of her bed, and the call button was hanging off the left side of the bed on the floor.c) Staff Interviews:Nurse Aide (NA) #48On 07/22/25 at 12:45 PM in an interview with staff member NA #48, She acknowledged the call light was not within Resident #23's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor and facilitate the resident's choice and right to self-determination regarding the resident's preference for showers. Resident Identifier #80. Facility Census: 98.a) Resident #80During an interview on 07/22/25 at 12:09 PM, Resident #80 reported that she was scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Fridays. She expressed a desire to have more frequent showers but noted that the staff were unable to accommodate her request. Additionally, she indicated that once she is seated on the shower chair, she can shower herself; the only assistance she required was with scrubbing her back.A review of records on 07/23/25 at approximately 10:54 AM revealed the following:Resident #80's preferences dated 02/05/25 revealed the resident's answer to the question;How important is it to you to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath? was Very Important!Record review on 07/23/25 at approximately 1:55 PM revealed the following:06/25/25 - Bed Bath06/28/25 - Response Not Required07/02/25 - Response Not Required07/05/25 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of suspected staff to resident verbal abuse was reported to the appropriate State Agencies, within a 2-hour time frame. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #47 Facility Census: 98. Findings Include: a) Resident #47 Interview with Resident #47, on 07/22/25 at 9:35AM, she reported Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #35 had called her a liar two (2) nights previous when she reported she had not had a bowel movement in five (5) days and asked for a laxative. Facility Policy and Standard Procedures Policy #NS1018-03:Mental Abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or had the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation and may be considered a type of mental abuse.During an interview with the Facility Administrator on 07/22/25 at 9:44 AM, the suspected staff to resident abuse was reported and he stated he would investigate it. In a follow up interview with the Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with assistance during showers. Resident Identifiers #80 and #19. Facility Census: 98.a) Resident #80 Findings Include: During an interview on 07/22/25 at 12:09 PM, Resident #80 reported that she is scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Fridays. She expressed a desire to have more frequent showers but noted that the staff were unable to accommodate her request. Additionally, she indicated that once she is seated on the shower chair, she can shower herself; the only assistance she requires is with scrubbing her back. A perusal of records on 07/23/25 at approximately 10:54 AM revealed the following: A resident #80's preferences dated 2/05/25 revealed that the resident's answer to the question; How important is it to you to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath? was Very Important Record review on 07/23/25 at approximately 1:55 PM revealed the following:06/25/25 - Bed Bath06/28/25 - Response Not Required07/02/25 - Response Not Required07/05/25 - Response Not Required07/09/25 - Response…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not implement proper monitoring and assessments for a resident who had close contact with another resident diagnosed with Varicella. Additionally, the facility failed to recognize and assess the potential risks to other residents due to unrestricted access to all areas of the facility by this resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #63 and #38. Facility Census: 98. Findings include:a) Resident #38Findings included:On 07/23/25 at approximately 10:42 AM, Resident #38 was observed under contact isolation. Record review revealed that Resident #38 had been moved out of the room she shared with Resident #63. Further record review revealed the following:A note was entered on 07/23/25 at 9:10 AM for Valacyclovir HCl Oral Tablet 1 GM. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for shingles for 7 Days.Valacyclovir is a prescription antiviral medication used to treat infections caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV).Another note on 07/23/25 at 9:58 AM stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure theresident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards aspossible. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery, Resident Identifier #69Facility Census 98 Findings Include:a) Resident #69During the facility entrance interview on 07/22/25 at 1:45 PM an observation revealed a medicine cup of ointment creme was left on the bedside table. Resident #69 stated it was ointment the nurse aides left there for her to use on her bed sores. In an interview with LPN # 6 on 07/22/25, at 1:48 PM, she stated she did not know what the medicine cup of ointment was and stated it should not have been left in the resident's room.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow recognized standards of care, and in addition, failed to follow the facility's own policy and procedures with regards to monitoring residents after a fall. This citation is cited at past non compliance. Resident identifier: #111. Facility Census 107. Findings include: a) Resident #111 Record review on [DATE] at approximately 11:15 AM revealed that the resident had an unwitnessed fall in his room on [DATE]. Record review revealed that the resident was found on the floor on [DATE] at around 9:15 AM. On [DATE] at 10:58 AM the Nurse Practitioner (NP) 171's notes stated the following: Per nurse, his spO2 on 2 liters NC. He was confused but redirectable. He had taken off his oxygen and it was replaced. Per staff, he was found on the floor near some wet towels. Patient stated he was getting back into bed when he fell. He knew it was 2024. He knew his name but could not say where he was located. A post fall evaluation nursing note by Registered Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on discharge electronic medical review (EMR) and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a safe and complete discharge. Resident #103 was discharged to a homeless shelter which did not have an available space and could not meet the medical needs of the resident. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident #103. Facility census: 99. Findings included: a) Resident #103 A review of the discharge EMR on 07/23/24 at 10:59 AM found Resident #103 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (insulin dependent), traumatic brain injury, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and unspecified dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/18/24 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. The BIMS score of 12 denotes moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #103 had capacity to make decisions. On 07/24/24 at 12:15 PM in an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed. A Nursing Assistant (NA) was observed to not be wearing the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing direct resident care to a resident in EBP due to a wound. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #28. Facility census: 99. Findings included: a) Resident #28 The facilty's policy and standard procedure titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, with no implementation date given, stated the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was gowns and gloves. The policy also stated PPE would be donned when providing high contact care activities as described above. Resident #28 had an order written on 04/04/24 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to: sacral pressure ulcer. A sign was posted on the door to the resident's room indicating EBP were in effect. The sign stated as follows: Enhanced Barrier Precautions Everyone must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown origin were reported in a timely fashion. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census: 103. Findings included: a) Resident #1 On 03/20/24 the facility reported an incident to all required entities. According to the reportable, Resident #1 was observed to have bruising of unknown origin. According to a progress note written on 03/19/24, the resident stated that his arm got banged while being transferred into the chair for bathing on 03/18/24. He denied pain to the extremity. Resident #1 is a [AGE] year-old male on hospice with multiple diagnoses including: dementia, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, right sided hemiparesis with flaccidity. The resident lacks the capacity to make medical decisions. The resident was receiving aspirin 325 milligrams (MG) daily due to a history of stroke. A side effect of aspirin therapy is a risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan when the resident's capacity to make medical decisions changed. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #58. Facility census: 103. Findings included: a) Resident #58 Review of Resident #58's medical records showed a Physician Determination of Capacity dated [DATE] which determined the resident had the capacity to make medical decisions. Another Physician Determination of Capacity was performed on [DATE] and determined the resident lacked the capacity to make medical decisions. Resident #58's comprehensive care plan contained the following focus, Resident has a CPR code Status Ability to make health care decisions, Disease process (Focus typed as written.) The focus had been initiated on [DATE] and had not been revised since then. On [DATE] at 4:42 PM, the Administer acknowledged Resident #58's care plan needed revised to reflect the resident no longer had capacity to make medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving resident neglect was reported within 24 hours of the event / allegation being brought to the facility's attention, to appropriate state agencies as required. Resident identifier: #7. Facility census: 103. Findings included: a) Resident #7 During a record review it was noted there was a written statement from CNA #96, dated 10/30/23. The statement indicated that once CNA #96 had picked up all resident breakfast trays on the hall she checked on Resident #7. Approximately 20 minutes later, Resident #96's family member reported the resident had bowel movement all over her. CNA #96 reported she immediately changed Resident #7 and gave her a complete bed bath. Additionally, CNA #96 stated she reported the family member's concern to the Administrator. On 01/16/23 at 11:30 AM, review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy revealed that an event may not be perceived by staff to constitute resident neglect; however, if a resident, family member, or visitor perceived the event to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a family member's allegation of resident neglect, maintain documentation that the alleged violation was thoroughly investigated, and report the results to Adult Protective Services and the State Survey Agency, within five (5) working days of the incident in accordance with State law. Resident Identifier: #7. Facility Census: 103. Findings included: a) Resident #7 During a record review it was noted there was a written statement from CNA #96, dated 10/30/23. The statement indicated that once CNA #96 had picked up all resident breakfast trays on the hall she checked on Resident #7. Approximately 20 minutes later, Resident #96's family member reported the resident had bowel movement all over her. CNA #96 reported she immediately changed Resident #7 and gave her a complete bed bath. Additionally, CNA #96 stated she reported the family member's concern to the Administrator. On 01/16/23 at 11:30 AM, review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy revealed -The accurate and timely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident receiving dialysis services. This was true for two (2) of two (2) dialysis residents reviewed for dialysis services. Resident identifiers: #92 and #21. Facility Census: 103. Findings included: a) Resident #92 Record review on 01/15/24 at 9:00 AM of the facility matrix reflects that Resident #92 receives hemodialysis services. Upon record review, on 01/15/24 at 9:10 AM, Physicians orders reflected that Resident #92 had dialysis three (3) days per week at a local dialysis center. Upon review of the care plan in place there is no care plan developed for the dialysis center name, resident chair time for dialysis or special provisions needed to provide the resident with a morning meal prior to leaving for dialysis in the focus area for dialysis. Resident #92 has the following medical diagnosis documented which includes but are not limited to: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other specified complications End Stage Renal disease Chronic Kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident interview the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice pertaining to dialysis orders, care plans and pre and post dialysis communication assessments. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for dialysis services. Resident Identifiers: #92 and #21. Facility Census: 103 Findings included: a) Resident #92 Record review on 01/15/24 at 9:00 AM of the facility matrix reflected Resident #92 received hemodialysis services. Upon record review, on 01/15/24 at 9:10 AM, there were no physicians orders for the dialysis with the dialysis center name, chair time or provisions to provide the resident with his morning meal prior to leaving the facility for dialysis. Resident #92 went to a local dialysis center three (3) days per week. Review of Pre and Post dialysis communication assessments found missing assessments. Review of the care plan reflects missing focus information. The facility policy for Hemodialysis Care and Monitoring states: Procedure: VIII Pre-Dialysis a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. The medication cart was unlocked and unattended. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 103. Findings included: a) On 01/16/24 at 8:41 AM it was observed that the medication cart on the 100 Hallway was unlocked. The nurse was not at the cart. In approximately four (4) minutes she returned from the direction of the 200 Hallway. The unlocked medication cart was confirmed on 01/16/24 at 8:45 AM with Unit Manager Registered Nurse #25 who was assigned to the cart.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident interview the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was true for two (2) of two (2) dialysis residents reviewed for dialysis services. Resident identifiers: #92 and #21. Facility census: 103. Findings included: a) Resident #92 Record review, on 01/15/24 at 9:00 AM, of the facility matrix reflects that Resident #92 receives hemodialysis services. Upon record review, on 01/15/24 at 9:10 AM, there were no Physicians orders for the dialysis center name, chair time or provisions to provide the resident with his morning meal prior to leaving the facility for dialysis. The Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) and care plan were reviewed. The facility policy for Hemodialysis Care and Monitoring states: Procedure: VIII Pre-Dialysis a. Evaluation completed within four (4) hours of transportation to dialysis to include but not limited to: i. Accurate weight ii. Blood pressure, pulse, respirations and temperature. b. Medications administered or medication(s) withheld prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to follow physician's orders for weekly weights for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered in a timely manner for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for receiving pain medications. The facility failed to complete neurological checks after unwitnessed falls for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for falls. Resident identifiers: #64, #73, #8, #58, #76, and #98. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident #64 Resident #64 had an order written on 08/28/23 for weekly weights for four (4) weeks, on Mondays. The resident's last weight was documented on 09/06/23. A nursing progress note written on 09/11/23 at 2:33 PM stated, Weekly weights every day shift every Mon for 4 Weeks. Unable to be completed at this time. Will report to next charge nurse to attempt. A nursing progress note written on 09/18/23 at 3:03…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete medical records for two (2) of two (2) residents receiving nutritional supplements. The amount of nutritional supplement consumed by the residents was not recorded. Resident identifiers: #64 and #98. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident #64 Resident #64 had an order written 08/23/23 for Ensure Plus oral liquid (nutritional supplement), give 237 milliliters (ml) by mouth three (3) times a day for weight loss. Supplement administration was documented on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) but the amount of supplement consumed by the resident was not recorded. During an interview on 09/19/23 at 4:15 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #48 confirmed the amount of Ensure Plus consumed by Resident #64 was not recorded. RN #48 acknowledged this could be useful information. b) Resident #98 On 08/23/23, Resident #98 had an order written for Ensure Plus oral liquid (nutritional supplement), give 237 milliliters (ml) by mouth three (3) times a day for nutritional support with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Infection control issues were observed on two (2) of two (2) medication carts. Observation on one medication cart revealed a glucometer that had not been cleaned and was stored in a medication cart with other medications. Observations on the second medication cart revealed an insulin pen and inhaler laid directly on a resident ' s over bed table and then was also stored in a medication cart with other resident ' s medications. Resident identifiers: #53, #82. Facility census: #98. Findings included: a) Resident #53 On 09/20/23 at 8:20 AM observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) #8 performing the fingerstick blood glucose monitoring on Resident #53. RN #8 carried the glucometer into the resident's room and placed it on the resident's nightstand. There was no clean surface between the nightstand and the glucometer. Additionally, the glucometer was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal vaccinations in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of pneumococcal vaccinations. Resident identifier: #15. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident #15 Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old admitted [DATE]. Review of Resident #15's medical records showed the resident's representative consented for the resident to receive pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 20 (PCV20). The consent was not dated. There was no documentation the resident received PCV20 vaccination. On 09/19/23 at 10:47 A.M., the Infection Preventionist (IP) was interviewed. The IP confirmed Resident #15 had not received PCV20 vaccination. The IP stated someone else had obtained vaccination consent upon the resident's admission and she was not aware that the resident's representative had consented to pneumococcal vaccination. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan to remove the enhanced barrier precaution isolation focus. This was true for five (5) of thirty four (34) residents reviewed for care plans. Resident Identifiers: #199, #36, #88, #82, #63. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident #199 On 05/01/23 at 9:00 AM, an observation found that Resident #199 had an intravenous (IV) access. On 05/02/23 at 2:00 PM, record review found the care plan showed she was on enhanced barrier precautions. On 05/02/23 at 2:10 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Infection Preventionist (IP) #59 they informed the surveyor that she was not in isolation, that having an IV does not warrant isolation and the care plan was not revised. b) Resident #36 On 05/02/23 at 2:00 PM, record review found the care plan for Resident #36 showed he was on enhanced barrier precautions. The Resident has a history of open pressure wounds but they are resolved. On 05/01/23 at 2:10 PM, during an interview with the DON and IP #59 they informed the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was true for three (3) of three (3) Residents reviewed for the Activity Care Area during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier: Resident #37, Resident # 45 and Resident #53. Facility Census: 98. Findings Included: A review of a facility policy titled Activities Program with no date revealed the following. .Procedure: a. Designed to encourage restoration to self-care and maintenance of normal activity that is geared to the individual resident's needs. .iii. Activities away from the facility . .x. Community activities . .f. reflect the schedules, choices and rights of the resident i. Are offered at hours convenient to the residents, including holidays and weekends . a) Resident #37 During an interview on 05/01/23 at 9:56 AM Resident # 37 stated there is nothing to do here, especially in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding administering medication based on a pain scale for Resident #21, recording urinary catheter output for Resident #31, and administering medication on time for Resident #199. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #21, #31, and #199. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident #21 On 05/01/23 at 12:15 PM, an interview was held with the resident. The resident stated, my back hurts The resident, also, stated the nurse gave me some pain medication. On 05/02/23 at 11:00 AM, the resident's medication administration record was reviewed for April, 2023. The review found the resident had two (2) physician's orders for pain based on the pain rating by the resident. The first physician's order dated 03/29/23 was Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 mg (milligrams) every six (6) hours as needed for a pain level of seven (7) through 10. The second physician's order dated 04/12/23 was Acetaminophen 325 mg two (2) tablets as needed for mild pain one (1) through three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who smoked had a current smoking assessment. In addition, the medication cart was found unlocked and unattended and hazardous chemicals were stored next to silverware, plates and cups. This was a random opportunity of discovery. Resident identifier: #82. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident #82 On 05/01/23 at 12:30 PM it was observed Resident #82 smoked. A record review found the last smoking assessment documented for Resident #82 was 10/28/22. According to the facility Resident Smoking Policy Smoking assessments for those residents requesting to smoke will be completed or re-evaluated i) on admission ii) Quarterly iii) Any change in clinical condition . There were no additional smoking assessments performed in January and April 2023. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing on 05/02/23 at 10:27 AM. b) Medication Cart On 05/02/23 at 8:04 AM during the medication pass observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #133 fail to lock the medication cart and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have competent staff to administer intravenous (IV) antibiotics. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for IV administration of antibiotics. Resident identifier: #199 Facility census: #98 Findings included: a) Resident #199 On 05/01/23 at 12:22 PM the Medication Review Audit Report was reviewed and compared against Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) that have had IV administration education and training. It was found there were three (3) agency nurses that had administered the IV antibiotic for Resident #199 that have not had the appropriate education and training. On 04/10/23 at 9:00 AM LPN #135 administered the IV antibiotic. On 04/20/23 at 9:00 PM LPN #34 administered the IV antibiotic. On 04/25/23 and 04/26/23 at 9:00 AM LPN #136 administered the IV antibiotic. This was confirmed on 05/02/23 at 2:38 PM with the Director of Nursing. .
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for three (3) of four (4) nurse aides reviewed. This practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Employee identifiers: #131, #91, and #122. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) A review of nurse aide education and personnel records was completed on 05/02/23 with the Human Resource Manager. The employee files lacked annual performance reviews for nurse aides (NA) #131, #91, and #122. Employee #131 was hired on 12/23/21. Employee #91 was hired on 02/22/22. Employee #122 was hired on 11/18/17. During an interview of 05/02/23 at 1:00 PM, the Human Resources Manager, confirmed no annual staff reviews were completed. .
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide each resident food that was palatable. This has the potential to affect all residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Anonymous interviews During Initial tours during the LTCSP on 05/01/23 multiple Residents throughout the facility verbalized the dislike of the food that they receive from the kitchen. The verbalized concerns where the food was not palatable, and the poor quality of the food served. b) Resident Council During the Resident Council Meeting held on 05/01/23 beginning at 10:05 AM the Residents as a group were asked the question, Are you satisfied with the meals? The following concerns were voiced: -The food is terrible -It is always cold. -Breakfast was cold this morning. -My meals are always cold, it's not just one certain meal. c) Tray Temperature On 05/03/23 at 12:12 PM an observation of the dining room lunch meal found the tray cart door was left open during the tray pass. On 05/03/23 at 12:35 PM the last tray temperature was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store flat ware and glasses in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to storage. This has the potential to affect all Residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 98. Findings included: On 05/1/23 at 8:30 AM during the initial tour of the Kitchen found a mop bucket, mop heads, 2 wet floor signs, Chemical Floor Cleaner Ecolab Oasis being stored near and against a shelf that had the clean unwrapped flatware and plastic drink cups. During an interview with the Administrator (NHA) 05/1/23 at 8:33 AM confirmed the cleaning items should not be stored with clean dining wear. The NHA removed the mop bucket at this time. A review of the Safety Data Sheet for Chemical Floor Cleaner Ecolab Oasis revealed warnings: In case of eye contact: --Rinse immediately with plenty of water, also under the eyelids, for at least 15 minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. Get medical attention immediately. In case of skin contact: --Wash off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record. This was true for six (6) of 34 sample residents reviewed for the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: Resident # 37, #74, #29, #93, #11 and #2. Facility census: 98 Findings included: a) Resident #37 During a record review on 05/01/23 at 1:37 PM Resident #37's medical record revealed a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form showed that verbal consent was obtained from the resident's representative on 01/06/23. The consent was witnessed by two (2) staff members. However, the resident representative's actual signature was never obtained. The 2021 POST form guidance titled, Using the POST Form: Guidance for Health Care Professionals, 2021 edition, available on-line, stated, If the incapacitated patient's MPOA [medical power of attorney] representative or health care surrogate is unavailable at the time of form completion, this section can be signed by two witnesses for verbal confirmation of agreement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible to residents in their rooms and bathrooms. Findings were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #148. Room numbers: 301, 303, 304, 306, 308, and 309. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident (R) #148 An observation on 05/01/23 at 9:14 AM, found R#148 sitting in the wheelchair on the left side of the bed with his right arm propped up on a pillow. The call bell was attached to the bed rail on the far side of the bed out of reach. At 9:15 AM on 05/01/23, the Director of Nursing confirmed the call light was out of R #148's reach and immediately repositioned the call light in R #148's reach. b) Call lights in Resident's bathroom During the initial tour on 05/01/23 beginning at 9:00 AM the Resident's bathroom call lights cords were not accessible if the Resident was lying on the floor in the following rooms: -room [ROOM NUMBER] -room [ROOM NUMBER] -room [ROOM NUMBER] -room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to assure handrail were firmly secured and affixed to the corridor walls. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing on Unit three (3). Facility census: 98 Findings included: a) Handrails During a tour on 05/02/23 at 12:40 PM this surveyor discovered on Unit three (3) the following handrails were not firmly secured and affixed to the corridor walls. -The handrail between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] -The handrail between the clean linen closet and the shower room -The handrail across from the stairway exit During an interview 05/02/23 at 12:52 PM, the Maintenance Technician #111 acknowledged the rails were not secure and needed repaired. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that addressed residents' current medical and nursing needs. Resident (R) #149's care plan includes interventions for Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP), which the facility is currently not practicing. R# 45's care plan fails to identify the resident's need for assistance with showers. This is true for two (2) of 34 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #149 and #45. Facility census: 98. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #149 Review of the medical record on 05/02/23, revealed R# 149 was admitted to the facility after a prolonged hospitalization for treatment of respiratory failure secondary to pneumonia, bowel perforation, osteomyelitis, and wound care. The care plan dated 04/03/23, identifies an infectious disease process, including the administration of intravenous antibiotics and a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Interventions include: Enhanced barrier precautions during cares. On 05/02/23 at 2:10 PM, the Director of Nursing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received necessary services in the areas of personal hygiene. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of activities of daily living during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #59 and #45 Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident #59 On 05/01/23 at 9:10 AM, an interview with Resident #59 was conducted. The resident appeared disheveled and dirty fingernails were noted. On 05/01/23 at 11:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #59. The record review found on the care plan the resident was supposed to bathe twice weekly with one (1) staff member's assistance due to the resident being dependent for ADL care. On 05/02/23 at 9:00 AM, a review of the bathing and shower documentation for the last 30 days from 04/04/23 through 05/02/23 was completed. The review found no documentation of showers for Resident #59. The review also found no refusals documented throughout…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice in regards to monitoring pain levels. This is true for two (2) of two (2) Residents reviewed for pain during the Long-Term Survey Process. Resident identifier: #89 and #62. Facility census: 98. Findings included: a) Resident #89 During an Interview on 05/01/23 at 10:44 AM Resident #89 stated that he asked for pain medication, and he is still waiting. A medical record review at this time revealed Resident #89's Physician orders for pain management: oxycodone HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (Oxycodone HCl) *Controlled Drug* Give 1 tablet orally every 4 hours as needed for pain with start date 03/21/23. A continued review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed: --03/19/23 at 12:11 AM pain level 0 - Oxycodone HCI tablet given. --03/20/23 at 7:48 AM pain level 0 - Oxycodone HCI tablet given. --03/27/23 at 11:31 AM pain level 0 - Oxycodone HCI tablet given. --03/27/23 at 4:01 PM pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and vendor interview, the facility failed to provide Residents with a safe, clean homelike environment. The facility failed to keep rodent feces out of multiple personal resident belongings, contained rooms with multiple rodent traps and failed to keep room walls in a homelike condition. These were random opportunities for discoveries. The practice had the potential to affect an unlimited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #52, #64, #60, #37, #45 and #6. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #52 During an interview on 02/28/22 at 3:00 PM, Resident # 52 stated that there were rodent sightings daily and had to get a plastic container with lid to keep the rodents out of personal food. An observation on 02/28/22 at 3:01 PM, showed two (2) rodent trap boxes on the floor of room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview on 02/28/22 at 3:15 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #88 stated that there are rodents all the time in rooms 120, 122 and 124. NA #88…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for residents who smoke. There was no visible fire extinguisher and an open Smoker Tower with smoldering cigarette butts. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Residents identifiers: #8, #85, #39, #2, #22, #24. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Observation On 03/01/22 at 2:20 PM an observation was made of six (6)residents (#8, #35, #39, #2, #22, #24)smoking outside at the front entrance of the facility. There were two (2) Smoker Towers with one (1) having the lid off with paper in the container and smoldering. The base of the container was half full of cigarette butts. There was no observable fire extinguisher. Nurse Aide (NA) #24 was asked where was the fire extinguisher. NA #24 stated that there was one on the inside of the entrance door. No fire extinguisher was found on the inside of the entrance door. Another observation was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 03/02/22 at 9:46 AM. The NHA confirmed the Smokers Tower did not have the lid in place and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date foods, store clean dishes properly, ensure the stove and drip pan were clean and the ice machine contained a black and pink substance on the inside lip. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents who receive nutrients from the kitchen and pantries. Facility Census 93. Findings included; a) Labeling and Dating On 02/28/22 at 10:00 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen with the Culinary Director (CD) #1 found in the walk in refrigerators in kitchen and in the pantry refrigerators, items not labeled or dated as follows: ~water pitcher ~large container of lemonade ~ one (1) gallon of ice tea ~one (1) package of cheese not covered not labeled or dated ~one (1) package of bologna open and not covered, labeled or dated ~seven (7) frozen entrees in pantry on 300 Hall with no name or date CD #1 immediately took care of items not label and dated. b) Storage of dishes On 02/28/22 at 10:10 AM, during initial tour with the CD #1 found 48 drinking glasses stacked one on top of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, medical record review, facility documentation review and staff interview, the facility failed to post signage on a door of a room on transmission based precautions (TBP). Staff failed to properly don personal protective equipment (PPE) upon entering rooms on TBP and did not utilize hand sanitize between medication passes. The infection control policies were not current. These were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #286, #192 and #188. Facility census: 93. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled Standard Precautions and Transmission Based Precautions, reviewed on 06/25/21, showed that droplet precaution rooms staff would utilize the proper PPE's upon entering the room or cubical area including gloves, mask, and eye protection. A N95 mask, face shield, gown and gloves are required when caring for a resident with suspected Covid-19. a) Resident #286 An observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and vendor interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment for residents that was free of rodents. These were random opportunities for discoveries. The practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #52, #64, #60, #73, #45 and #53. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #52 During an interview on 02/28/22 at 3:00 PM, Resident # 52 stated that there were rodent sightings daily and had to get a plastic container with a lid to keep the rodents out of personal food. An observation on 02/28/22 at 3:01 PM, showed two (2) rodent trap boxes on the floor of room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview on 02/28/22 at 3:15 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #88 stated that there are rodents all the time in rooms 120, 122 and 124. NA #88 stated that the rodents come out all the time but more at night. During an interview on 03/01/22 at 10:30 AM, Owner of American Pest Control was present in the facility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's preference for no meat other than chicken. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #6. Facility Census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #6 During an interview on 02/28/22 at 2:56 PM, Resident #6's legal guardian/family member stated, We are mostly vegetarians. We only eat chicken. [Resident's First Name] should not receive pork, sausage, or beef. She can have chicken. Today she was supposed to have cheese ravioli but the kitchen sent beef instead. Resident #6's legal guardian/family member added, This isn't the first time they have sent meat other than chicken. A brief record review, completed on 02/28/22 at 3:10 PM, found the following dietary order, Regular diet, Dysphagia Ground texture, Thin consistency, 1:1 assist, NO BREAD / BEEF / PORK / ICE CREAM / CHOCOLATE, double portion veggies, thin liquid in 5cc sips via syringe if unable to contain cup sips (no straws unless used as pipette only). During an interview on 02/28/22 at 3:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 22 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form completed correctly per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). Resident identifiers: Resident #6 and Resident #65. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #6 A medical record review, completed on 02/28/22 at 2:43 PM, found the following: - A Physician Determination of Capacity, dated 08/29/21, indicating Resident #6 lacked capacity to make medical decisions. - Court Appointed Guardianship paperwork, dated 12/18/20, indicating Resident #6's family member was the legal decision-maker. - POST form, dated 08/27/21, 2017 edition. Section C of the POST form, entitled Medically Administered Fluids and Nutrition, directed Resident #6 should have IV (intravenous) fluids for a trial period of no longer than ______. The specified time-period was left blank and was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to report in a timely manner and not to appropriate agencies. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier- #47. Facility Census 93 Findings included; a) Resident #47 On 02/28/22 at 1:31 PM, when review of resident # 47 reportable of fall with major injury, found reportable to show that the fall occurred on 2/03/2022 and reportable was not completed and faxed until 2/09/22. Resident had a fracture of the C6 (spinal cord injury) and fax conformation sheet was only faxed to Office of Health Facilities and Certification (OHFLAC). Interview with the Administrator on 3/1/22 at 10:50 AM, asking what agencies was reportable faxed to. The Administrator stated, only to OHFLAC because there were no issue of abuse so Adult Protective Services (APS) was not notified. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure a dietary order was followed for Resident #6. This failed practice was true for one (1) of 22 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey process . Resident Identifier: #6. Facility Census: 93. a) Physician Order A brief record review, completed on 02/28/22 at 3:10 PM, found the following dietary order, Regular diet, Dysphagia Ground texture, Thin consistency, 1:1 assist, NO BREAD / BEEF / PORK / ICE CREAM / CHOCOLATE, double portion veggies, thin liquid in 5cc sips via syringe if unable to contain cup sips (no straws unless used as pipette only). Additionally, there was an order directing ENCOURAGE PT. TO DRINK EXTRA 100ML OF H20 EVERY MED PASS. DO NOT USE STYROFOAM CUP, USE HARD CUP. (DUE TO PT. CHEWING). b) Observation During an observation in Resident #6's room on 03/01/21 at 12:10 PM, it was noted there was a Styrofoam cup of water with a straw present on Resident #6's over-the-bed tray table. 03/01/22 at 12:30 PM, LPN #70 confirmed the Styrofoam cup with straw was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assessments of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before dialysis treatments. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for dialysis. Resident identifier: #189. Facility census: 93. Finding included: A record review of the facility's policy titled Hemodialysis Care and Monitoring, revised on 06/24/21, showed a pre-dialysis evaluation should be completed within four (4) hours before transport to dialysis treatment to include an accurate weight, blood pressures, pulse, respirations and temperature. a) Resident #189 Review of Resident #189's medical record showed progress notes that stated Resident #189 went out of the facility on 02/25/22 and 02/28/22. The medical record did not show any pre-dialysis evaluation or assessment prior to transport taking Resident #189 to dialysis treatment. During an interview on 03/01/22 at 12:10 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #41 stated that when a Resident goes out to dialysis the pre-dialysis assessment should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the pharmacist failed to identify irregularities for medication in excessive does related to acetaminophen. This was true for one (1) of six (6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier #73. Facility census: 93. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, with a revision date 09/23/19 showed: -- Unnecessary Drug: any drug when used in excessive dose. -- Irregularity includes, but not limited to any drug meets the definition of unnecessary drug. --The pharmacist will report any irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's medical director and director of nursing. a) Resident #73 A medical record review for Resident #73 found, Physician orders as follows: --Tylenol Tablet 325 MG (Acetaminophen) Give 2 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for breakthrough pain not to exceed 3 Grams (gm)/24 hours (Alert: Resident already receiving scheduled Tylenol twice daily (BID) with start date of 08/15/21. --Tylenol Tablet 325 MG (Acetaminophen) Tylenol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident #73 was free from unnecessary medications. This was true for one (1) of six (6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier #73. Facility census: 93. Finding included: A record review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, with a revision date of 09/23/19 showed the Director of Nursing or designee will be responsible for addressing all medication irregularity reports the attending physicians in a manner that meets the needs of the resident. a) Resident #73 A medical record review for Resident #73 found, a physician order as follows: --Singulair Tablet 10 MG (Montelukast Sodium) Give 10 mg tablet by mouth at bedtime for allergies with an order date of 04/25/21. Continued record review revealed a pharmacist recommendation made on 10/15/21 Singulair for allergies, it is noted that she is on Zoloft for depression. Singulair can cause mood changes, depression, and other mood disorders. Physician prescriber response on 10/20/21: Make Singulair as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-05-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| C.R. STOLTZ FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| C.R. STOLTZ IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| I. ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| I. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| R.S. WILHEIM IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| RONALD S WILHEIM 2012 SPOUSAL TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| ROSEDALE FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| RRW, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| S.L. ROSEDALE IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2016 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2016 |
| SO GEORGE MGT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2016 |
| DATTA, VASANT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2021 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/14/2023 |
| HELMAN, JACOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/08/2019 |
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2025 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/11/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515156. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.