Clarksburg Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 92.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe environment to prevent elopement, resulting in Resident #41 leaving the facility. This failure to ensure residents did not exit the facility unattended on 07/11/2024 placed all at risk residents who could have exited the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. This will be cited at past noncompliance because the facility corrected the failure as of 07/09/24, prior to this survey. Resident Identifier: #41. Facility Census:96. The State Agency (SA) determined this Past Non_Compliance had the potential to cause serious injury, harm, impairment or death to occur. Past non compliance Immediate Jeopardy was issued on 10/16/24 at 3:32 PM. The past non compliance occurred on 07/11/24 and was corrected on 07/13/24. Findings included: a) Resident #41 On 07/11/24 Resident # 41 left the facility through an unsecured door and walked to the front returning to the facility. 1) Progress Notes 7/11/2024 01:12 Pt went out a side door and then walked to the front door.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for fall interventions, means of communication and multiple diagnoses. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #5, #61 and #44. Facility Census: 88. a) Resident #5 - On 05/04/26, Resident #5's care plan was reviewed for fall precautions/interventions. The resident's care plan stated, Device: Non-skid strips to floor on the left side of bed. and Device: Nonslip material to wheelchair for safety. The resident's orders stated, DEVICE: DYCEM to wheelchair for safety every shift, and Device: Non-skid strips to floor on the left side of bed. On 05/04/26, the state surveyor observed Resident #5's room and wheelchair. There were no non-skid strips of tape on the resident's left side of the bed and Dycem was placed on top of the resident's wheelchair cushion. On 05/04/26 3:40 PM, Corporate Registered Nurse #101 confirmed there was no non-skid tape on the resident's left side of the bed and Dycem was on top of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to follow menus as posted, This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #31, #47 and #71. Facility Census: 88.Findings included: a) On 04/29/2026 at 11:52 AM, the menu posted at the entrance of the first-floor dining room stated: Cranberry Orange ChickenGarlic and [NAME] roasted Red Skin PotatoesDinner RollMandarin Oranges On 04/29/2026 at 11:52 AM, Nurse Aide #88 confirmed cabbage was not listed on the posted menu and cabbage was served to residents for lunch in the dining room. b) Resident #31 On 04/28/26 at 10:50 AM, during the initial interview, Resident #31 reported receiving chicken wings which were not on the menu for a couple of meals. c) Resident #47 On 04/29/26, Resident #47 received ravioli and cabbage which were not listed on the posted menu. Licensed Practical Nurse #77 confirmed that residents received ravioli and cabbage for the lunch meal. d) Resident #71 On 04/29/26, Resident #71 received ravioli and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The Facility failed to ensure residents were served meals timely on A Hall.During the annual survey process, the facility failed to ensure timely provision of meals in accordance with posted meal service times of 7:00 AM to 8:15 AM for Breakfast, 12:00 PM to 1:15 PM for Lunch, and 5:00 PM to 6:15 PM for Dinner.Observation revealed that at 9:40 AM on 5/5/26, residents on A Hall were still being served breakfast, significantly beyond the scheduled meal service window. Resident #74, identified as requiring feeding assistance, was still waiting for their meal at that time. During an interview, CNA #72 stated, This happens often, regarding delayed meal tray delivery from the kitchen. It was further reported that A Hall received meal trays around 9:00 AM. During an interview, the facility administrator stated, One hallway has to be last, when addressing the delayed meal service.Additionally, surveyor observation noted meal pass occurring on A Hall at approximately 9:40 AM. On 4/28/26 at 10:50 AM, Resident #31 expressed concern regarding consistently late meal service, stating, I fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff hand hygiene was completed during the dining process. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 88.Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for Standard Precautions stated that hand hygiene should be performed: A. Before eating/feeding or assisting in the dining room and tray pass. On 04/28/26 at 11:55 AM, during the dining room observation, Registered Nurse #75 did not use hand hygiene between residents while serving. Nurse Aide #72 and Registered Nurse #75 passed drinks to each other and then served the residents their drinks without performing hand hygiene. At 12:05 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #33 confirmed the hand hygiene issues in the dining room.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident/family interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure patient care equipment, specifically mechanical lifts with frayed, taped wires, was maintained in safe operating condition. Resident identifiers: #21, #31, #9, #17, #75, #44, #45, #47, #13, #79, #29, #66, #105, #73, #82, #83, #16, #33, #63, #64, #68, and #84. Facility Census: 88. Findings included:a) On 04/29/26 at approximately 4:30 PM, a resident's family member spoke with the state survey team concerning an issue with the mechanical lifts. The Joerns' Hoyer Lifts, model [NAME]-PRESENCE-S) were an issue per the discussion. The family member stated the resident lifts were dirty and had electrical tape on them. They reported sometimes only one lift was in operating condition and was used between both floors.On 04/29/26 at 5:15 PM, the Survey Team inspected the lifts in the shower rooms on both floors. Both lifts had electrical tape on the wires attached to the cradle on both sides. The lift on the first floor had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for fall preventions were followed. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #5. Facility Census: 88.Findings included:Resident #5 a) On 05/04/26, Resident #5's orders were reviewed for fall precautions/interventions. The resident's orders stated, DEVICE: DYCEM to wheelchair for safety every shift, and Device: Non-skid strips to floor on the left side of bed. On 05/04/26, the state surveyor observed Resident #5's room and wheelchair. There were no non-skid strips of tape on the resident's left side of the bed and Dycem was placed on top of the resident's wheelchair cushion instead of underneath it. On 05/04/26 at 3:40 PM, Corporate Registered Nurse #101 confirmed there was no non-skid tape on the resident's left side of the bed and Dycem was on top of the resident's cushion instead of underneath it to help prevent the cushion from sliding/slipping out of the wheelchair. Corporate Registered Nurse #101 confirmed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment in the shower room was free from accident hazards on A Hall. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier #39. Facility Census: 88.Findings included: a) Resident #39 On 04/29/26 at 6:09 PM, the state surveyor investigated the shower room on C Hall. Resident #39, a resident from D Hall, was in the bathroom adjacent to the shower room. The resident could open the door from the bathroom into the shower room. The shower door was locked with a keypad entrance. The bathroom door is not locked from the hallway. A gallon jug of Medco Prewash MP2017 was open and sitting on top of the wheelchair washer machine. According to the Safety Data Sheet (SDS), the product is labeled: H315 Causes skin irritation and H319 Causes serious eye irritation. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Licensed Practical Nurse #42 confirmed the bottle of cleaner was open and in the shower room. The gallon jug of Medco Prewash MP2017 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to dispose of an expired vial of insulin for Resident #11 on the B medication cart. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #11. Facility Census: 88.Findings Include: a) Resident #11 On [DATE] at 9:10 AM, the medication cart on B hall was checked for the care area of medication storage. An expired vial of Lispro insulin for Resident #11 was found. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #77 verified the insulin vial expired on [DATE]. The vial's opening date was noted as [DATE]. On [DATE] at 9:14 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed that insulin expired 28 days after the vial is opened.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure drinks including water and other liquids were served consistent with residents' needs and preferences. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents, Resident Identifier: #12. Facility Census: 88.Findings included: a) Resident #12 On 04/28/26 at 12:15 PM, during the dining room observation on the first floor of the facility, Resident #12's tray card stated, Hot Coffee - 6 Oz. Resident #12 did not receive hot coffee as printed on the tray card. When the state surveyor asked the resident if she wanted coffee, the resident stated, Yes, I wanted coffee. The resident received coffee following surveyor intervention. On 04/28/26, Licensed Practical Nurse #33. confirmed the resident did not receive coffee as printed on the tray card. The facility's policy and procedure for Dining and Food Preference stated, Individual dining, food and beverage preferences are identified for all residents and patients.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #5 and #35. Facility Census: 88.Findings included: Resident #5 On 04/28/26, Resident #5's tray card was reviewed. The residents' tray card stated, Dys Mech - Regular and Pureed Buttered Dinner Roll - #16 Scp. The resident received a whole, unbuttered roll with the lunch meal. Resident #5's diet order stated, Regular Diet Dys Mech texture, Nectar Thickened Liquids consistency. Resident #35 On 04/28/26, Resident #35's tray card was reviewed. the residents tray card stated, Dys Mech - Regular and Pureed Bettered Dinner Roll - #16 Scp. Resident #35's diet order stated, Regular diet Dys Mech texture, thin liquids consistency, for diet. At 12:10 PM, Registered Dietician #20 confirmed Resident #5's and Resident #35's tray cards stated Dysphagia Mechanical Soft Diet with pureed buttered dinner roll - #16 scoop and that the residents did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,036 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-10-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV