Taylor Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 59.2 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards. issues with food storage were found in the facility kitchen walk in cooler, utensil drawer, and nourishment pantry. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census: 59Findings Included: a) On 9/29/25 11:35AM, during initial brief tour of Kitchen, with Corporate Dietary Manager (CDM) #82 CDM #82 who acknowledged the following:-Utensils found in drawer scattered in all different directions-The reach in cooler temperature per inner thermometer was at 41 degrees. On 9/30/25 at 9:30AM During the Nourishment Room visit with the facility Dietary Manager (DM) the DIM who acknowledged the following in the nourishment room cupboard, a jar of peanut butter, with no name or date label, The Corporate Dietary manager stated the peanut butter belonged to a staff member and that it should not have been there. 11/10/2025 11:14 AM kitchen re-visit with the corporate Dietary Manager, 82 who acknowledged the reach in cooler temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers:# 9, #31, #47, #48, #54, #58 and #66. Facility Census: 59 a) On 09/29/25 at 12:25 PM an observation revealed that when CNA # 65 and CNA #40 were assisting in passing lunch trays on A Hall they passed the noon meal trays to Resident #54, #48, and #58, and did not offer hand hygiene. The above finings were confirmed in an interview with the Administrator on 09/29/25 at 1:10 PM at which time she stated the residents were to be given wipes to clean their hands with each meal. Findings Include a) Resident #9, #31 and #47 On 09/29/25 at 12:10 PM it was observed when Unit Manager #23 was assisting in passing lunch trays on the A Hall. She pass the noon meal tray to Resident #9 and did not offer hand hygiene. When ask if they offer hand hygiene she commented, it is usually on the tray, I'm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Facility failed to provide residents a dignified experience by pulling them down the hall backwards when the resident was unable to propel himself. Resident identifier: #43. Facility census: 59. a) Resident #43The facility failed to provide Resident #43 a dignified experience by pulling them down the hall backwards when resident was unable to propel himself. 11/11/25 1:15 PM observed Staff #77 puling Resident #43 down the hall backwards. When asked Staff #77 if that is how they normally transferred she stated, No he normally takes himself, but I needed to change his shirt. 11/11/2025 1:31 PM observed resident propelled himself up the hall towards the dining room. 11/11/2025 1:40 PM DON stated, We do not have a policy but that is not good practice. I will educate them no on not pulling them backwards.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist the resident in gaining access to hearing services by making appointments and arranging transportation. This failed practice was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for referral to specialized services during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier: #32. Facility Census: 59.Findings Include a) Resident #32During an interview with Resident #32 on 09/29/25 the resident stated that she had difficulty hearing what people were saying. Resident #32 stated I don't feel like I am a part of the world. I have to ask people to repeat themselves constantly. Resident further noted that her husband had Got us the railroad insurance. Everything is covered 100%. So, I should be able to get hearing aids.Record review on 09/29/25 at 10:05 AM revealed no documentation that the facility had set up any referrals or appointments for an evaluation with a hearing specialist. Record review further revealed that the resident has a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-11 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide specialized drinking equipment ordered by the physician. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (3) three residents reviewed for nutrition during the Long-Term care Survey Process. Resident identifier #56. Facility Census 59. Findings Include: a) Resident #56 A record review on 09/30/25 at 11:40 AM, revealed a physician's order for Resident #56 that read as follows: Dysphasia, advance texture, think liquids consistency, double portion entree with all meals, finger foods when available, food in bowls, Kennedy cup with all meals An observation on 09/30/25 at 12:25 PM revealed Resident #56 being served his lunch in the dining room. Registered nurse (RN) #13 served him his lunch tray and there was no [NAME] Cup. The RN opened his milk and put a straw in it. During an interview on 09/30/25 at 12:28 PM , RN # 13 stated, They send them out of the kitchen, He did not have one on his tray. The RN confirmed that Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect and/or mistreatment were reported, no later than 24 hours of the alleged event brought to the facility's attention, to appropriate state agencies as required. Residents #40, #50, #46, and #55. Facility Census: 59 Findings included: During a review of the facility grievance log for the last six (6) months the following four (4) alleged concerns were noted and addressed at the grievance level but were not reported to the appropriate state agencies. a) Resident #40 On 07/04/23 Resident #40 reported that Resident was upset and reported that staff are not changing her clothes when putting her to bed. Stated she ask to have pajamas put on and was told no and put to bed in her clothes. Resident #40 has a Brief Intermediate Mental Status Score of 15 and according the the Physicians' Determination of Capacity form dated 03/28/23, she has capacity to make her own decisions. b) Resident #50 On 07/24/23 Resident #50 reported that she heard staff mocking residents and saying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a walk-in cooler was cleaned to meet the professional standards for food service safety. During the kitchen tour it was discovered the floor of the walk-in cooler needed to be cleaned. This had the potential to affect any resident receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 59 Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 12/18/23 at 11:39 AM, it was discovered the walk-in cooler along the front side wall had an accumulation of brown crusted debris on the floor. In an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 12/18/23 at 1:10 PM, verified the crusted particles on the floor of the walk-in freezer needed cleaned.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to be informed of, and participate in, her treatment. This was true for one (1) of 17 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier# 34. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #34 A record review, completed on 12/19/23 at 7:41 PM, revealed: -Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. At that time, Resident #34 lacked capacity to make her own medical decisions and a family member was appointed Health Care Surrogate (HCS) / decision-maker for resident. -A Physician Determination of Capacity, dated 09/08/23, indicated Resident #34 had regained CAPACITY to make her own medical decisions. -On 12/07/23, verbal consent was accepted from the HCS for Resident #34 to receive the Influenza Vaccine -On an unknown date [the date was left blank on the consent form], verbal consent was accepted from the HCS for Resident to receive the 2023-2024 COVID-19 Vaccine. Record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify one (1) of three (3) resident's representative/family member in a timely fashion of a significant change and the need to alter treatment. The facility transferred Resident #28 to the hospital on [DATE]. However, Resident #28's representative / family member was not notified of the transfer. Resident Identifier: #28. Facility Census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #28 A medical record review, completed on 12/18/23 at 8:19 PM, revealed the following details: -A Nurses Note, dated 09/11/2023 at 6:00 PM, documented Resident #28 was going in and out of consciousness and 911 was called. -A second Nurses Note, dated 09/11/2023 at 6:01 PM, revealed resident's physician was contacted and updated on the resident's status. -A third Nurses Note, dated 09/11/2023 at 6:29 PM, documented the ambulance had arrived and report had been called to the hospital regarding resident's current status. -The eINTERACT Transfer form did not indicate the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on recorded reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the development of comprehensive person-centered care plans for three (3) of 17 residents. The care plans were not developed in the areas of schizophrenia for Resident #5, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for Resident #10, and hospice services for Resident #37. Resident identifiers: #5, #10, and #37. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #5 Medical record review, on 12/20/23 for Resident #5, revealed the comprehensive care plan had not been developed for the medical diagnosis of schizophrenia. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/20/23 at 10:12 AM, verified the care plan had not been developed for Resident #5's diagnosis of schizophrenia. b) Resident #10 During a medical record review on 12/20/23 for Resident #10, revealed the comprehensive care plan had not been developed for the medical diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). An interview, with the DON on 12/20/23 at 10:30 AM, verified the care plan had not been developed for the diagnosis of PSTD for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV