Martinsburg Healthcare Center
209 Clover Street, Martinsburg, WV 25404 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (304) 263-8921 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2022
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.6% | 14.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.4% | 7.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.2% | 15.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.6% | 27.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.9% | 22.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.6% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.2% | 79.4% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.8% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.5% | 11.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.54 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.87 | 1.84 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.6%CMS range 48.0–62.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.6%CMS range 6.2–12.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 70.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.2–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents in six (6) rooms. Room identifiers: #136, #143, #147, #149, #151, and #160. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 117. Findings included: a) Upon survey entrance on 06/16/25 at 1:58PM, it was observed the following issues in Resident room numbers: room [ROOM NUMBER]: - wallpaper loose with air bubbles on the wall beside the bathroom door approximately 3 feet from the floor - wallpaper loose with air bubbles on the window wall beside bed B, approximately 2 feet from the floor - scuffs and black marks on the inside of the bathroom door - A Large circular hole in the bathroom wall behind the toilet approximate size 6 inches wide room [ROOM NUMBER]: - scrapes and tears in the wallpaper on the wall next to the sink - black scuff marks and loose trim inside bathroom door - A Large circular hole in the bathroom wall behind the toilet approximate size 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to perform an accurate discharge process for two (2) of 3 residents reviewed during the survey process for hospitalization. Resident identifiers: #30, and #279. Facility census: 115 Findings included: a) Resident #30 Resident has capacity to make her own medical decision. The resident was on hospital leave from 03/23/25 until 03/26/25. There was no documentation to support the ombudsman was notified of the transfer. The facility was unable to provide a Bed Hold Notice for this hospital leave. This form was requested from the DON on 06/18/25 at 11:57 AM. On 06/18/25, late afternoon, the DON stated she was unable to find one. On 06/24/25 at 2:05 PM, discussion was held with the DON and NHA about the transfer process for this hospitalization. At this time the surveyor asked if they had any additional information to provide. NHA stated no. b) Resident #279 Resident #279 sustained a fall with injury in the facility on 02/24/25 and was transported to an acute care facility Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to properly store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census: 117. Findings included: a) On 06/16/25 11:35 AM, during the Initial Brief Tour of Kitchen, with Assistant Dietary Manager #182 acknowledged the following: In the Freezer it was observed that a bag of frozen Hamburger patties were left opened and exposed. On 06/17/25 at 1:00 PM a review facility policy labeled HCSG Policy 019, Food Storage: Cold Foods. Procedures, number 5 stated All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. A bag of macaroni was observed left open and exposed in the pantry On 06/17/25 at 1:00 PM a review facility policy labeled HCSG Policy 018, Food Storage: Dry Goods. Procedures, number 5 stated All packaged and canned food items will be kept cleam, dry, and properly sealed. The temperature inside the kitchen refrigerator was 45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident's representative of the risks and benefits of an anti-psychotic medication. This was found to be true for 1 (one) of six (6) residents reviewed. Resident identifier: #95. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #95 Resident #95 had a diagnosis of depressive disorder on 05/10/24 and was prescribed Sertraline HCI tablet 50 mg on 05/10/24. The facility failed to inform the resident's medical representative of the risks and benefits of the medication, other treatment options or alternatives. The resident did not have capacity to make her own medical decisions. During the survey process, on 06/18/25 at 0:38 AM, the surveyor requested to see an informed consent for Sertraline. On 06/18/25 at 02:01 PM, the DON stated she was not able to locate the consent form. The DON did present a note from the medical record where the facility had tried to call the resident's representative, but the representative never returned the call. On 06/24/25 at 2:02 PM, surveyor met with DON and NHA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order for oxygen administration was followed. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #6. Facility Census: 116. Findings include: a) Resident #6 During an observation on 06/16/25 at approximately 3:47 PM, the resident was observed asleep. The oxygen concentrator was noted to be set at three (3) liters per minute. A review of Resident #6's medical record revealed that the resident was diagnosed with Acute and Chronic Respiratory failure with Hypoxia. A review of Resident #6's care plan revealed a note that stated: 'Resident takes off O2 at times. Encourage the resident to allow the staff to replace the O2. Date Initiated: 02/27/2025 During the survey period, there were no observations of the resident with her nasal cannula removed. Physicians' orders prescribed Oxygen at two (2) liters per minute. Follow-up observations over the next few days revealed the following: 6/17/25 at 11:15 AM - Resident observed asleep with oxygen concentrator set at 3 liters per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the consulting pharmacist failed to identify and notify the physician of potential Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR's) related to the concurrent administration of opioids, benzodiazepines. Further, the pharmacist failed to identify that a medication had been prescribed to a resident with a documented allergy to it. Resident identifier: #6. Facility Census: 116. Findings Include: a) Resident #6 Record review on 06/16/25 at approximately 12:25 PM revealed that Resident #6 was an [AGE] year-old female. Resident #6 did not have capacity and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment on 05/07/25 revealed a BIMS of 02. The resident has been diagnosed with the following: Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Alzheimer's Disease Major Depressive Disorder Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery without angina pectoris Following the record review, Resident #6 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to monitor the expiration dates of medical supplies. Further, the facility failed to ensure that expired medical supplies were disposed of and not left accessible for use by staff for resident care. Facility Census: 116. Findings Include: a) North Medication Room During an inspection of the North Medication Room on [DATE] at approximately 9:16 AM, accompanied by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #17, the storage bins holding medical supplies revealed the following: 31 - BD 1 ML Syringes - expiration date [DATE] 7 - Insyte 24 GA x 0.75 in injection syringes - expiration date [DATE] LPN #17 counted and confirmed the expiration dates on the syringes. LPN #17 further stated that she would notify the DON of the finding, and dispose of the expired syringes.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to the residents and unsanitary practices. This failed practice was a random opportunity of discovery. Facility Census: 117. Findings included: a) During a facility walk through on 06/16/25 at 3:34 PM, an opened box of tissues, an opened box of gloves and an opened package of wipes, was found on the middle shelf sitting on top of the clean linen of the linen cart in the South Hall. On 06/17/25 at 9:56 AM, during a facility walk through, an opened box exam gloves, a small roll of clear garbage bags, and an opened package of wipes was found on top of the clean linen on the top shelf of the linen cart in the South Hall . On 06/16/25 at 3:45 PM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #107, she acknowledged the items on the linen cart and stated nothing should be on the linen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents. Namely, dependent residents were not aided with toileting, cleaning themselves, and changing absorbent pads or briefs in a timely manner. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents surveyed. Resident Identifiers: Resident identifier: #50. Facility Census: 116. Findings Include: a) Resident #50 Record review on 06/18/25 at approximately 10:00 AM revealed that Resident #50 does not have capacity. The record review revealed the following: The facility had submitted an initial report of an allegation of neglect in the area of incontinence care for Resident #50 on 03/26/25 at 1:49 PM. The facility had submitted the five-day follow-up report on 03/28/25 at 1:53 PM. The report stated that the alleged perpetrator, Nursing Assistant (NA) #15 was suspended pending the completion of the investigation. The five-day follow-up report stated that 'After thorough investigation, the allegation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to resident handwashing. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Meal tray pass An observation during dining observation on 09/19/23, at 11:45 PM revealed the residents in the north dining room, did not receive hand hygiene prior to or during the lunch meal tray pass. An observation on the 106 - 115 north hall on 09/19/23 at 12:15 PM found the residents were not offered to wash their hands prior to the lunch meal. During an interview, on 09/19/23 at 12:22 PM, with Unit Manager (RN) #106 the Unit Manager verified no hand hygiene was completed prior to the meal service in the dining room or the halls. She stated they usually use hand wipes for the residents. She stated that they used to have hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on review of the concern/grievance forms, review of the facility documentation of reportable occurrences, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations of abuse, were reported immediately, to all officials (including to the State Survey Agency and Adult Protective Services (APS), where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law, through established procedures. This deficient practice was found true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed. An allegation of abuse, the staff had knowledge of, was not reported in a timely manner involving Residents #20 and #119. Resident identifiers: Residents #20 and #119. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Policy Review A review of the Policy and Procedure, titled: WV Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation, Policy #NS1018-03, approval date of 05/25/23, noted on page 15 of the policy, under 1. B., if the allegation did not cause serious bodily injury or abuse, the report must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight loss to evaluate and manage causes of the resident's nutritional risks and impaired nutritional status. This is true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for weight loss. Resident identifier: # 51. Facility census: 116. Findings included: a) Resident #51 On 09/19/23 during a complaint survey for weight loss and physician notification a record review for Resident #51 revealed a significant weight loss on 09/01/23. Registered Dietician Notes: 9/1/2023 14:27 Weight Change Note Note Text: WEIGHT WARNING: Value: 180.8 -5.0% change over 30 day(s) [ 6.7%, 13.0] -3.0% change over 30 day(s) [ 3.8%, 7.2] -5.0% change [ 6.8% 13.2 ] (Transcribed as Written) 9/18/2023 15:50 Weight Change Note Note Text: WEIGHT WARNING: Value: 179.2 -3.0% change over 30 day(s) [ 4.0%, 7.4] -7.5% change [ 7.6%, 14.8] -10.0% change [ 10.6%, 21.2] (Transcribed as Written) Continued Medical record review found no notification of the Physician for Resident #51's significant weight changes. On 09/19/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered by the physician. This was true for one (1) of five (5) records reviewed for pain management. This failed practice has the potential to affect a limited number of resdents. Resident identifier: #424 Facility census: #115. Findings included: a) Resident #424 On 05/24/23 at 4:08 PM, it was noted the facility did not follow physicians orders for administering pain medication for Resident #424. The physicians order with a revision date of 11/19/22 was for Oxycodone HCL tablet 5 mg give 1.5 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain. For the review period of 11/01/22 through 12/31/22 there were nine (9) doses of Oxycodone not administered. Resident #424 was under Hospice care for end of life care during this time period. Further review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows the following: On 11/17/22 at 6:00 AM the medication was signed out of the narcotic count log by Registered Nurse #129 but not documented as being administered. On 11/22/22 at 6:00 PM the medication was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) were completed by a pharmacist and the physician responded to the pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. This is true for four (4) of five (5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: #7, #34, #8, #22. Facility census: 115. Findings include: a) Policy The facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review with a review date of 02/28/23, states non-urgent medication irregularities will be addressed with the attending physician no later than the next routine visit. The attending physician must document in the medical record the identified irregularity reviewed, any action taken to address rational for declining the recommendation. b) Resident (R) #7 Review of the medical record on 05/23/23 revealed there were no MRR for October 2022, November 2022 and February 2023. In addition, the medical record lacks a physician response to the MRR dated 08/27/22. The MRR date 08/27/22 requests a gradual dose reduction for R#7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews during resident council, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a substantial/nourishing snack was provided as ordered and/or offered if of ordered between the evening meal and breakfast. This had the ability to affect all residents who did not have a dietary order to receive an evening snack. Resident identifiers: #61, #30, #54, #36, and #9. Facility Census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident Council Meeting During the resident council meeting on 05/23/23 at 1:00 PM, all residents in attendance stated the facility did not offer an evening snack to residents. They went on to say they would like an evening snack and felt the majority of facility residents would enjoy a bedtime snack. One (1) resident stated, They used to do that, but they don't do it anymore. Another resident reported being told by staff that the new ownership doesn't like to provide the snacks and the individual should probably have family bring them. When asked if all residents in the facility had ever been told they could request an evening snack, resident council members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to complete labeling and dates on refrigerator and freezer items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to storage. This has the ability to affect all Residents that receive their nutrition from the kitchen and pantries. Facility census: 115. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage with revision date 09/2017, showed that All food will be stored wrapped or covered containers, labeled, and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. a) Kitchen During the initial kitchen tour on 05/22/23 at 9:15 AM, an observation found: --Walk-in Freezer- pork Butcher Box, 2 hamburger patties, large package of hot dogs, chicken crumbles, were not labeled or dated. Walk-in Freezer- Box of sausage patties, Chicken pieces and a pork roast, not closed, open to air. During an interview on 05/22/23 at 9:22 AM, the Dietary Director confirmed the items were not labeled and stated that all food items should be labeled and dated. b) Resident North Pantry's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store garbage and refuse in a proper manner. One (1) dumpster did not have a lid, the area was polluted with garbage and used medical supplies. This has the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Dumpster area An observation on 05/24/23 found on the ground around the dumpster area was polluted with garbage, bags full of trash, and used medical supplies. On 05/24/23 at 1:57 PM during an interview the Maintenance Director verified the garbage was not disposed of correctly. He stated that the lid to the dumpster has been gone for a while. .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for four (4) of thirty-two (32) records reviewed. Resident identifiers: #88, #421, #91 and #91. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #88 On 05/22/23 at 2:32 PM it was noted that there was a transmission based precaution (TBP) donning/doffing station outside of Resident #88's room. There was however, no signage on the door to instruct what kind of precautions or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was needed. According to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 the resident had nebulizer treatments ordered and the PPE is for treatments. The order states: Albuterol Sulfate inhalation Neulization Solution 2.5 MG/0.5 ML (Albuterol Sulfate) 1 vial inhale orally via nebulizer every 4 hours as needed for COPD. and DuoNeb Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3 ML (Ipratropium-Albuterol 1 application via mask every 6 hours as needed for COPD. According to the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/24/23 at 2:00 PM, there should be an order reading: Aerosol Droplet Precautions during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to have signage on the door and/or a donning/doffing station available at the door of a resident's room designated as a transmission-based precaution (TBP) room. Resident Identifiers: #88, #114, #111 and #101 Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Policy review According to the Guidance for Aerosol Generating Procedures dated 02/03/22, An N95 mask, and full PPE must be worn with all aerosol generating procedures.close the door to the resident room before performing treatment. Keep door closed throughout treatment and for one hour post treatment if it is safe to do so . b) Resident #88 On 05/22/23 at 2:32 PM it was noted that there was a donning/doffing transmission based precaution (TBP) station outside of Resident #88's room. There were however, no signage on the door to instruct what kind of precautions or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was needed. According to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 the resident has nebulizer treatments ordered and the PPE is for treatments. The order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of Resident #50. The facility failed to issue Resident #50 an invitation to attend two (2) appeals hearings regarding the discharge for nonpayment. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #50. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #50 During an interview on 05/23/23 at 8:11 AM, Resident #50 reported she had been given a discharge notice for nonpayment. Record review, completed on 05/23/23 at 7:10 PM, identified the following details: -A Physician Determination of Capacity, dated 04/21/21, which stated Resident #50 had capacity to make decisions. -A Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) on file listing resident's family member as DPOA. (A durable power of attorney is a legal document that gives another person the authority to make financial decisions for someone.) -A Social Service Note, dated 02/17/23 at 9:03 AM, stated that the social worker had received notification from the Business Office Manager of a telephone hearing for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to immediately inform a resident or the resident representative when there was a need to begin a new form of treatment or a change in care was required for two (2) or 32 residents reviewed. Resident #10's representative was not notified of a facility acquired pressure ulcer or the initiation of treatment for the pressure ulcer and Resident #30 was not notified of a change in a medical appointment. Resident identifiers: Resident #10 and Resident #30. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Policy Review A review of the Policy for Notification of Change in Condition, titled Policy #NS1068-01, no date noted, showed under Circumstances requiring notification included but was not limited to, under item 3, Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment which may include a new treatment or discontinuation of a current treatment. Under the section Notifications, when a change in condition was noted, nursing staff would contact the resident and/or representative. b) Resident #10 A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence the required Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) notice was issued in a timely fashion for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk of not being informed of their rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifier: #370. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Beneficiary Notice Review On 05/23/23 at 11:00 AM, a review was completed regarding the beneficiary protection notification liability notice given for the following resident who was discharged home following her last covered day of Medicare Part A services: -Resident #370's last covered day of Part A Services was on 01/02/23. -Resident #370 was not issued a NOMNC. -Resident #370 was discharged to home on [DATE]. The Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 state: The NOMNC must be delivered at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality for all aspects of care and services. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #50. Facility census: 115 Findings included: a) Resident #50 During an interview on 05/23/23 at 8:11 AM, Resident #50 reported being upset that the facility's Social Worker (SW) discussed private information about her finances and the fact that she was being discharged for nonpayment in front of her roommate. A record review, completed on 05/23/23 at 7:02 PM, revealed the following: - A Social Service Note, dated 4/25/2023 at 10:45 AM, which stated, This writer and Transportation Coordinator spoke with the patient at length regarding discharge planning. Patient reports that if she is unable to secure a HB (hospital bed), lift, and all other supplies/services necessary to ensure her discharge is safe, she states she will not be discharging . Patient's hearing date is 5/16 and she still won't make a decision as to where she's discharging. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the walls of a resident's room and keep a resident's wheel chair clean and odor free. These were random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #53 and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident (R) #53 During an interview on 05/22/23 at 10:02 AM R#41 reported her roommate R#53 is frequently incontinent, her wheel chair smells of urine and is not cleaned regularly. R#41 pointed to the wheel chair in the hall and acknowledged it smells. An observation noted a strong odor of urine and multiple food crumbs in the seat and foot rest of the high back wheel chair. At 11:03 AM on 05/23/23, Registered Nurse (RN) #10 and Central supply coordinator (CS) #138 confirmed R#53's wheel chair was full of food crumbs and smelled of urine. CS#138 removed the cushioned cover from the wheel chair and carried it to the laundry. After checking with the supervisor, laundry staff reported the cover…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, electronic medical record review and Operation Policy, the facility failed to follow written policy, thoroughly investigating and reporting to the proper agencies of an allegation of neglect. This has the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 115. Findings Included: A record review of the facility's policy titled, West Virginia Abuse, Neglect & Misappropriation, showed: --Training 1) Provide education and training upon hire, annually and as needed for re-training to include not limited to: a-Recognizing signs of abuse, neglect exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, such as psychosocial and physical indicators (including injuries of unknown source) --Reporting 1) The Executive Director / designee will report appropriate incidents to Office of Health Facilities Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC), Adult Protective Services (APS), the Regional Ombudsman, and other local authorities, including but not limited to local law enforcement (if appropriate), as required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to report alleged violation related to, neglect, or abuse, and report the results of all investigation to the proper authorities within prescribe time frames. This has the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility census: 115. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, West Virginia Abuse, Neglect & Misappropriation, showed: --Training 1) Provide education and training upon hire, annually and as needed for re-training to include not limited to: a-Recognizing signs of abuse, neglect exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, such as psychosocial and physical indicators (including injuries of unknown source) --Reporting 1) The Executive Director / designee will report appropriate incidents to OHFLAC, APS, the Regional Ombudsman, and other local authorities, including but not limited to local law enforcement (if appropriate), as required by the State. a- If the events that cause allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to take actions to investigate an alleged violation related to, neglect and failed to take corrective actions following an investigation to re-educate staff after a resident injury. This has the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Resident identifiers: #4, #13, #10. Facility census: 115. Findings Included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, West Virginia Abuse, Neglect & Misappropriation, showed: --Training 1) Provide education and training upon hire, annually and as needed for re-training to include not limited to: a-Recognizing signs of abuse, neglect exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, such as psychosocial and physical indicators (including injuries of unknown source) --Reporting 1) The Executive Director / designee will report appropriate incidents to OHFLAC, APS, the Regional Ombudsman, and other local authorities, including but not limited to local law enforcement (if appropriate), as required by the State. a- If the events that cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence the long-term care Ombudsman was provided a copy of the written Notice of Transfer for two (2) acute hospital transfer/discharges for Resident #92. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Resident identifier: #92. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #92 A medical record review was completed on 05/23/23 at 11:00 AM. There was no evidence the facility had provided a copy of the written Notice of Transfer/Discharge for Resident #92 to the long-term care Ombudsman for an acute hospital transfer/discharge on [DATE] or for another acute hospital transfer/discharge on [DATE]. In an interview on 05/24/23 at 11:11 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the facility could not produce evidence that the Ombudsman had been notified.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the facility bed hold when transferred. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Resident identifier: #92. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #92 A medical record review was completed on 05/23/23 at 11:00 AM. There was no evidence the facility had provided a bed hold notice for an acute hospital transfer/discharge on [DATE]. In an interview on 05/24/23 at 11:11 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the facility had not provided a bed hold notice for the 05/10/23 discharge because the facility had initially thought it was discharging Resident #92 to the behavioral health treatment center as opposed to the resident having a short-term stay for stabilization purposes and then returning to their facility. .
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Aerosol droplet precautions. This was true for two (2) of thirty two (32) care plan records reviewed. Resident identifiers: #88 and #91. Facility Census: #115. Findings included: a) Resident #88 On 05/22/23 at 2:32 PM during the initial interview phase of the Long Term Care Survey Process it was noted that there was a transmission based precaution (TBP) donning/doffing station outside of Resident #88's room. There was however, no signage on the door to instruct what kind of precautions or what personal protective equipment (PPE) was needed. According to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 the resident has nebulizer treatments ordered and the PPE is for treatments. The order states: Albuterol Sulfate inhalation Neulization Solution 2.5 MG/0.5 ML (Albuterol Sulfate) 1 vial inhale orally via nebulizer every 4 hours as needed for COPD. and DuoNeb Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3 ML (Ipratropium-Albuterol 1 application via mask every 6 hours as needed for COPD. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to revise care plans for two (2) of 32 resident's care plans during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident #3's had not been revised for a nutritional intervention and Resident #421 had not been revised for hospice services. Resident identifiers: #3 and #42. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #3 During a medical record review on 05/22/23 for Resident #3 revealed the care plan had not been revised for the nutritional intervention to add a double entree' portion with meals/per dialysis for protein with a start date of 01/23/23. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/24/23 at 9:37 AM, verified the care plan was not revised to include the order for double entree portions for meals with a start date of 01/23/23. b) Resident #421 On 05/22/23 at 1:33 PM a record reviewed showed there was no order for hospice care while it was on the facility matrix as an active resident under hospice care. Record review of the care plan and an interview on 05/23/23 at 1:51 PM with the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's orders for weekly weights and the administration of pain medication for a Hospice resident was not followed. These were random opportunities for discovery with the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #424 and #57. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #424 On 05/24/23 at 04:08 PM, it was noted the facility did not follow physicians orders for administering pain medication for Resident #424. The Physicians order with a revision date of 11/19/22 was for Oxycodone HCL tablet 5 mg give 1.5 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain. For the review period of 11/01/22 through 12/31/22 there were nine (9) doses of Oxycodone not administered. Resident #424 was under Hospice care for end of life care during this time period. Further record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows the following: On 11/17/22 at 6:00 AM the medication was signed out of the narcotic count log by Registered Nurse #129 but not documented as being administered. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and treatment, based on the comprehensive assessment of the resident, to ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for pressure ulcer care. This was found true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Resident #10 developed a facility acquired pressure ulcer, however, there were inconsistencies with the identification and time treatment was started to ensure monitoring of the healing process for the pressure ulcer. Resident Identifier: Resident identifier: #10. Facility census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #10 An interview, with the Treatment Nurse, on 05/23/23 at 8:24 AM, revealed the facility's policy is to perform weekly measurements of a pressure ulcer. Additionally, the Treatment Nurse confirmed, when a pressure ulcer was identified, the date would be documented the pressure ulcer was identified and treatment initiated. A record review for Resident #10, showed documentation of a skin assessment being completed on 12/12/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on employee record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Employee #44 and #148 had completed the required annual 12 hours of in-services for dementia and abuse prevention. This deficient practice was found true for two (2) of five (5) employee records reviewed for staffing. Employee identifiers: #44 and #148. Facility Census: 115. Findings included: a) Required annual 12 hour in-services During a review of employee records on 05/23/23, it was discovered employee Nurse Aide (NA) #44 and NA #148 had not completed addressing areas of the required annual in-services to include special resident needs, needs of residents with cognitive impairments, and abuse prevention. In an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) 05/24/23, verified NA #44 and #148 had not completed the required annual in-services to include dementia, cognitive impairments and abuse prevention. .
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of staff postings and staff interview, the facility failed to display the required data on the daily Staff Postings. This was a random opportunity for discovery and affected a limited number of residents and visitors. Facility census: 115. Findings included: During a review of the staff postings on 05/23/23, it was discovered the daily staff postings for 05/01/23 to 05/22/23 had no daily census. The facility must post the following information on a daily basis: 1. Facility name. 2. The current date. 3. The total number . 4. Resident census. In an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 05/24/23 at 1:20 PM, verified the Staff Postings did not include the daily census. .
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident and/or representative is educated on the risks and benefits and given the opportunity to accept or decline the pneumonia vaccine prior to administration. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for immunizations. Resident identifier: #40 Facility census: 115. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #40 Review of the medical record on 05/22/23, found R#40 received the pneumococcal conjugate 20 (PCV20) vaccine on 09/05/22. The record lacks information related to education given to the resident on the risks and benefits of the vaccine and a consent to receive the PCV20 on 09/05/22. During an interview on 05/22/23 at 3:35 PM, the Infection Preventionist/Registered Nurse #23 acknowledged the medical record lacked a consent for the PCV20 vaccine administered to R#40 on 09/05/22. .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food to residents at the same table in the north dining room as well as in resident rooms. Resident #1 was put to bed without sheets. Resident identifiers #1. North Dining room and north hall rooms 105, 112 and 115. Facility Census 111. Findings included: a) Resident #1 - No sheets on Bed On 06/07/22 at 12:30 PM, observed resident laying in her bed with no sheets. During an inteview with Registered Nurse (RN) Unit #133 at 12:35 PM verified the resident should not be in bed without any sheets. RN Unit Manager #133 further stated, Resident just got back from getting a shower and then the lunch cart came so the aide who has the resident probably did not have time to make the bed. Not that it changes anything but, yes, I will address it. d) North Hall On 06/07/22 at 12:00 PM during an observation of the noon meal tray pass on the North Hall, rooms 105 to 115 found, staff did not serve each resident in rooms [ROOM NUMBER] at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with contractures had interventions in place to prevent further decline. This was true for three (3) of five (5) resident reviewed for the care area of limited range of motion (ROM) during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #26, #65, and #73. Facility census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #26 During a resident interview, on 06/06/22 at 6:04 PM, Resident #26 pointed to a splint that was resting on top of the nightstand and stated, I'm supposed to wear that splint on my hand [pointing to her left hand] every day but the staff doesn't always know how to put it on correctly without hurting me, so I just let it go. When asked if she would wear the splint if it was applied appropriately and did not cause her discomfort Resident #26 stated, Yes. I know I should be wearing it every day. When asked how long it ha been since she had worn the splint to her hand Resident #26 replied, It's been months…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a drug regimen of each resident was completed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist. This was true for four (4) of six (6) residents reviewed for unnecessary medication reviews during the annual long-term care process. Resident identifiers: #93, #75, #59, #73. Facility census: 111. Review of the facility's policy entitled Medication Regimen Review (MRR) Time Frame, with a revision date of 05/03/21, found the following guidance, The medication regimen of each patient is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed Consultant Pharmacist. Findings included: a) Resident #75 A medical record review was completed on 06/09/22 at 8:31 AM. A monthly medication regimen review (MRR) was not on file for the months of July 2021 and August 2021. During an interview, on 06/09/22 at 9:40 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the facility was in transition switching to Remedi Senior Care (a business that provides pharmacy services to long-term care facilities) and there was no official pharmacist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to making prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward resolution. This is true for one (1) of four (4) reviewed for grievances during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifiers: #19. Facility census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #19 On 06/06/22 at 3:58 PM during an interview with Resident #19, she stated that her bible has been stolen/ missing for a week or more. Resident #19 stated that she reported the bible missing and nothing has been done about the item. 06/08/22 a record review of missing items /grievances revealed, no grievance form was filled out. A medical record review of Resident #19's quarterly 3/18/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS), found the resident's brief interview for mental status was twelve (12). A BIMS score of 12 indicates that the resident is considered to be mildly impaired cognitively. A continued medical record review for Resident #19 revealed a progress note dated 6/2/2022 at 4:15 PM: --Activities Note -Note Text: Patient was in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, family interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse in the form of mental anguish. The failed practices were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #62. Facility census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #62 During an interview on 06/06/22 at 4:30 PM, Resident #62 stated that there was a problem with another Resident and the problem resulted in a resident to resident altercation on 06/02/22. Resident #62 stated the other resident aggressively claimed Resident #62 stole a Bible. Resident #62 stated the other resident, yelled at me saying you stole my Bible. Resident #62 stated that the door of room had been closed and the resident opened the door to Resident #62's room, walked right in and again began asking where was the Bible. Resident #62 stated she did not report to staff when the resident willfully entered room but stated all staff did after the resident to resident altercation was add an additional anxiety medication so now I am on two (2) anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, observation, record review and staff interview facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident to resident altercation to prevent and take corrective action as a result of the investigative findings. The failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #62. Facility census 111. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation , revised on 08/26/19, stated, The Center will investigate all allegations and incidents. a) Resident #62 During an interview on 06/06/22 at 4:30 PM, Resident #62 stated that there was a problem with another Resident and the problem resulted in a resident to resident altercation on 06/02/22. Resident #62 stated the other Resident aggressively claimed Resident #62 stole a Bible. Resident #62 stated the other resident, yelled at me saying you stole my Bible. Resident #62 stated that the door of room once had been closed and the Resident opened the door to Resident #62's room, walked right in and again began asking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Notice of Transfer for an acute hospital transfer. The facility also failed to provide evidence that a copy of the Notice of Transfer was sent to the Ombudsman. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #12. Facility census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #12 An electronic medical record review was completed on 06/07/22 at 10:36 AM. Resident #12 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence a written Notice of Transfer/Discharge was provided to Resident #12's legal representative. During an interview on 06/08/22 at 10:40 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) reported the facility was unable to provide evidence a Notice of Transfer Discharge was given to resident's legal representative. Additionally, the facility failed to produce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Bed Hold Notice for a hospital transfer. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #12. Facility census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #12 An electronic medical record review was completed on 06/07/22 at 10:36 AM. Resident #12 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence a written Bed Hold Notice was provided to Resident #12's legal representative. During an interview on 06/08/22 at 10:40 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) reported the facility was unable to provide evidence a Bed Hold Notice was provided to Resident #12's legal representative. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to insulin. This was true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for drug regimen review during the annual long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #93. Facility census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #93 A record review was completed on 06/06/22 at 5:43 PM. The record review demonstrated that Resident #93 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and had three (3) different orders for administration of insulin to treat her disease. A review of the Medication Administration Records (MARS) for revealed three different occasions the physician orders were not followed, and the MAR was left blank regarding the administration of insulin for Resident #93. On 03/12/22 the physician order, Lantus SoloStar Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine) Inject 18 unit subcutaneously two times a day for Diabetes Mellitus was not followed. There was no documentation on the MARS that the 8:00 PM dose was administered. On 06/22/22 the physician order, NovoLOG FlexPen Solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to deliver respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice. A physician's order for oxygen was not followed. This was a random opportunity for discovery, during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident Identifier: #70. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #70 An observation of Resident #70, on 06/06/22 at 4:03 PM, revealed the Resident was receiving oxygen at one (1) Liters via nasal cannula (an oxygen delivery device) from an oxygen concentrator. A review of Resident #70's physician order, revealed the order Oxygen at two (2) Liters Per Minute (LPM), for shortness of breath. A second observation of Resident #70, on 06/08/22 at 1:49 PM, revealed the Resident was receiving oxygen at one (1) Liters via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator. An interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #133 on 06/08/22 at 1:55 PM, verified the Resident was receiving oxygen One (1) Liter Per Minute. RN #133 confirmand that Resident #70 was ordered oxygen at two (2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to assess for the indications required for the use an antianxiety medication and adequately monitor the medication side effects. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #62. Facility census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #62 During an interview on 06/06/22 at 4:30 PM, Resident #62 stated that there was a problem with another Resident and the problem resulted in a resident to resident altercation on 06/02/22. Resident #62 stated the other Resident aggressively claimed Resident #62 stole a Bible. Resident #62 stated the other resident, yelled at me saying you stole my Bible. Resident #62 stated that the door of room had been closed and the Resident opened the door to Resident #62's room, walked right in and again began asking where was the Bible. Resident #62 stated she did not report to staff when the resident willfully entered room but stated all staff did after the resident to resident altercation was add an additional anxiety medication so now I am on two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately document pain levels for pain management and did not documented the administration of an anxiety medication or the side effects of the medication after administration. The failed practice was true for two (2) of 32 sampled residents. Resident identifiers: #13 and #62. Findings included: a) Resident #13 During an interview on 06/06/22 at 3:34 PM, Resident #13 stated, I have pain. I do take Norco and have a prn Tramadol but the Norco does not always cut it . Review of Resident #13's medical record showed a diagnosis of chronic pain due to trauma. A physician order with start date of 03/18/22 stated, Norco Tablet 10-325 MG (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) *Controlled Drug*Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. The Medication administration record (MAR) for June 2022 showed Resident received Norco for a pain level of five (5) on 06/06/22 at 8:16 AM and again for a pain level of four (4) on 06/07/22 at 7:41 AM. The MAR also stated, Is resident currently experiencing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 109 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 109; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROMEO, DOMINIC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2023 |
| STOLTZ, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2022 |
| WILHEIM, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2022 |
| FOUR LEAF CLOVER MGT CO., LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/25/2025 |
| GROVES, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/04/2023 |
| MASON, NANCY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2022 |
| MORRIS, SAMUEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2023 |
| ODENTHAL, RICHARD | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/16/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515039. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.