Glenwood Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 49% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 77.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility has control. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #1, #7, #64, #72, #79 and #42. Facility Census: 90. Findings included: a) Resident #42 On 06/16/2026 at 9:50 am, Resident #42 was observed in bed with fall mat propped up against the opposite wall of her room. At 10:03 AM during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #62, entered the room and was asked about the fall mat. She stated she did not think it was permitted to be in use with the table. She moved the resident's bed to the lowest position and left the room to get her some medication. When she returned she stated she had asked her superior and was wrong, then proceeded to put the resident's fall mat to the right side of her bed. Review of Resident #42's care plan page 1 and 2 revealed the following: Focus The resident has had multiple falls related to poor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing and glove use was being utilized during meal service. This was found during the annual survey process. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 91. Findings include:a) Review of policy for Food preparationPolicy statement- All foods are prepared in accordance with the FDA Food CodeProcedures reads in part:All staff will practice proper handwashing techniques and glove use.Dining Services staff will be responsible for food preparation procedures that avoid contamination by potentially harmful physical, biological, and chemical contaminationReview of policy for Meal DistributionPolicy Statement: Meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that ensures proper temperature maintenance, protects against contamination, and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner.Procedures read in part:Proper food handling techniques to prevent contamination and temperature maintenance controls will be used for point-of-service…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents' dignity and respect were maintained during meal service in the dining room. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #88 and #77. Facility Census: 90. Findings included: a) Resident #88 On 06/15/26 at 12:20 PM, during observation of the dining room, Resident #88 was observed at a table with a visitor eating his lunch meal. The resident's catheter bag was hanging from the bottom of his wheelchair uncovered. At 12:10, Nurse Aide #119 confirmed the catheter was not covered and stated, Yes ma'am. The facility's policy and procedure for Catheter Drainage Bag and Tube Maintenance stated, g. Drainage bags will be covered when the resident is out of the room for dignity and infection prevention. b) Resident #77 On 06/15/26 at 12:20 PM, during observation of the dining room, Resident #77 was observed being assisted by Activities Leader #78 with her meal. The resident's plate of food and drinks were left on the serving tray and the lid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a Resident's discharge from the facility and return to home. This was true for Resident #97. Resident identifier: #97. Facility Census: 90. Findings included: Findings inclueded: a) Resident #97 Resident #97 was discharged to home on [DATE]. On 06/16/26 a review of resident's medical chart showed no documentation of notification of discharge to Ombudsman for Resident #97. b) During an interview with the facility Administrator on 06/17/26 at 12:51 PM, she acknowledged that the social worker did not complete a notification to the ombudsman for the resident at that time. She stated the social worker was unaware the ombudsman needed to be notified and that they subsequently received in-service training.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was updated for a resident with a new diagnosis of dementia after admission to the facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #8. Facility Census: 90.Findings included: a) Resident #8 On 06/15/26, during Resident #8's initial record review, the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was reviewed. The resident's admission date to the facility was 10/11/25. The resident's primary diagnosis listed in the medical chart was Sjogren syndrome, Unspecified. A diagnosis of Dementia in other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Unspecified Severity, With Other Behavioral Disturbance was added to the medical record on 10/24/25. Dementia was not marked on the resident's most recent PASRR dated 10/28/25. On 06/16/26 at 2:15 PM, the Interim Director of Nursing reviewed the PASRR and confirmed dementia was not indicated on the PASRR and stated that she would check for an updated PASRR. No additional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurately completed on admission to the facility for a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Resident Identifier: #8. Facility Census: 90. Findings included: a) Resident #8 a) On 06/15/2026, during Resident #8's initial record review, the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was reviewed. The resident's admission date to the facility was 10/11/25. The resident's medical record documented a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) on 10/11/25. b) PTSD was not marked on the resident's most recent PASRR dated 10/28/25. On 06/16/26 at 2:15 PM, the Interim Director of Nursing reviewed the PASRR and confirmed PTSD was not indicated on the PASRR and stated that she would see if there was an updated PASRR. No additional information was given to the state surveyor.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised for three (3) residents. The issues included resident's a resident receiving a thirty (30) day notice of discharge, a resident's dialysis weight being documented in the medical record and a resident receiving tube feedings. Resident identifiers: #2, #8 and #59. Facility Census: 90. Findings included: a) Resident #59 An interview with the resident on 06/15/26 at 3:37 PM revealed Resident #59 had capacity to make her own medical decisions and reported that she would like to discuss the possibility of a discharge home. Resident #59 reported she had never attended a care plan meeting and stated that she was unsure as to what it was of if she had been invited. Review of the resident's records showed a copy of an invitation to a care plan meeting dated 05/13/26 in the chart. There is no evidence in the chart that a care plan meeting was held that day. Interview with Social Worker #12 on 06/17/26 at approximately 11:30 AM revealed there was no note written on the day of the care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to utilize adaptive equipment for safe fluid intake appropriately. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #51. Facility Census: 90.Findings included:a) Resident #51 On 06/15/26 at 12:25 PM, during the dining room observation, Resident #51 had a two-handled cup with a lid and could not get his thickened drink to come out. The hole in the adaptive cup was located on the top side of the cup instead of the bottom. The hole in the cup was not positioned where the resident could get a drink. The resident attempted several times to get a drink. Nurse Aide #119 confirmed the resident was unable to get a drink and turned the cup around so the resident could get a drink following state surveyor intervention. On 06/16/26 at 12:10 PM, Resident #51 was observed in the dining room attempting to get a drink. When the state surveyor asked the resident what was wrong, Resident #51 answered, Can't drink. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, home-like environment. Packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) units contained dirt and debris. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #1, #57, #23. Facility census: 80. Findings included: a) PTAC units On 02/10/25 at 11:44 PM, the packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) unit in Resident #57's room was observed to have debris, including an adhesive bandage, in it. On 02/10/25 at 12:04 PM, the PTAC unit in Resident #23's room was observed to have debris in it. On 02/10/25 at 12:07 PM, the PTAC unit in Resident #1's room was observed to have dirt in it. On 02/11/25 at 10:35 AM, the Housekeeping Manager and Regional Manager confirmed the dirt and debris in the PTAC units for Residents #57, #23, and #1. They stated PTAC units are cleaned by the Maintenance Department. On 02/11/25 at 10:50 AM, the Maintenance Director stated the PTAC units are cleaned every three (3) months. He confirmed the dirt and debris in the PTAC units for Residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff Interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for Resident #49 in the area of weight management. Resident identifier: #49. Facility census: 80. Findings included: a) Resident #49 Multiple care areas in the care plan had interventions that included weight management and monitoring 02/12/25 9:20 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #49 had an order for no weights in February. The DON confirmed there was no documented weight for January and there were multiple areas in the care plan for weights to be obtained and monitored. The DON stated, Just about every care plan. The DON reported the patient had multiple refusals for weights to be obtained and had requested no weights.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV