Summersville Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 88.4 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and held at a safe temperature to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses. The facility failed to take temperatures of food at the time of preparation and prior to service for foods held on a steam table. Taking the temperature is critical to ensure food is heated to the appropriate temperature and held at temperatures outside of the food danger zone. The food danger zone is greater than 41 degrees F and/or less than 135 degrees F. The facility utilized a Service Line Checklist that indicated the name of the food items and temperatures for all hot and cold food. The checklist indicated the temperature should be taken prior to service and recorded in the boxes below each food item. A review of these checklists found from 08/24/23 through 09/04/23 no temperatures were recorded for all three meals. Also, from 09/06/23 through 09/25/23 no temperatures were recorded for all three meals. For 09/26/23 the temperatures were not recorded for breakfast or the lunch meal. The temperatures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two (2) of 84 residents were free from neglect when it failed to maintain and provide safe transportation for the resident in the facility van. Resident #69 experienced a fall that resulted in actual physical harm when they suffered a fracture to both legs. In addition Resident #84 sustained several falls where the care plans were not implemented or revised. She sustained on final fall on 06/10/23. Review of Physicians/Medical Examiners Certification of Death for Resident #84 dated 6/29/23, evidenced the cause of death as complications of blunt force injuries. The description of how injury occurred was a fall striking head on a doorway while ambulating down hallway. The failure to put interventions in place for Resident #84 after her numerous falls resulted in actual harm. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls. Actual harm was only suffered by Resident #69. Resident identifiers: #69 and #84.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to perform tracheostomy care within accepted standards of care. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of one (1) residents observed for tracheostomy care. Resident Identifier: #3. Facility Census: 88. Findings included: a) Resident #3 The facility's policy titled, Tracheostomy Care, with no implementation date given, gave instructions to review the resident's medical record, noting the type and size of the tracheostomy tube. Review of Resident #3's physician's orders showed the following orders, which were written on 12/04/25: - Trach care daily and prn [as needed]. Clean stoma and flange, change drain sponge. Change disposable inner cannula. - Trach: Shiley Cuffless Size 4: 6.5 mm[millimeters] trach with 5.5 inner canula. On 04/29/2026 at 10:15 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #83 was observed performing Resident #3's tracheostomy care. After removing the inner cannula of the tracheostomy, RN #83 cleaned around the resident's tracheostomy site repeatedly due to the resident coughing up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received pain management in accordance with professional standards of practice, by not recording the pain level for as-needed (PRN) pain medication. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed for the care area of pain during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #3. Facility Census: 88.Findings Include:a) Resident #3A record review on 04/28/26 at 2:22 PM, revealed an order for Resident #3 that read as follows:Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 7.5-325 Milligrams (MG): Give one tablet via G-Tube every 6 hours as-needed for pain.A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 04/02/26 to the present showed that the PRN Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Tablet was administered 43 times to Resident #3. For 27 of the 43 times the PRN medication was administered, no pain levels were indicated in the medical record. Further record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/09/26, Section C, revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure storage of medication within accepted standards of practice. A bottle of medication located in the second floor medication storage room had expired. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #3. Facility Census: 88. Findings included:a) Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Stock Medications, with no implementation date given, stated medications would be discarded when out of date. On [DATE] at 8:24 AM, the second floor medication storage room was inspected with Registered Nurse (RN) #111 in attendance. In the floor stock medication cabinet, a bottle of magnesium tablets, 500 mg, had an expiration date of [DATE]. RN #111 confirmed the medication had expired.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and resident interview, the facility failed to provide meals that were palatable and appetizing for residents of the facility. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #37, #30, #16, #39, #68, #6, #74, #46. Facility census: 88. Findings included: a) Resident Interviews During the survey process, multiple surveyors obtained interviews from residents at the facility regarding the food served. The interviews are as follows: Approximately 9:56 AM on 11/12/24- Resident #37's Power of Attorney (POA) states The food is mediocre, at best. Approximately 2:04 PM on 11/11/24- Resident #30 stated The food is awful. You can't chew it. You have to eat some of it though, or else you'll get sick. Approximately 10:36 AM on 11/12/24- Resident #16 stated The food is not good. Approximately 1:39 PM on 11/11/24- Resident #39 stated The food sucks. Approximately 12:10 PM on 11/11/24- Resident #68 stated The food is a disaster, I got a hot dog on a plate with nothing else. Approximately 12:00 PM on 11/11/24 - Resident #6 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure equipment in which they prepared food, was kept clean and sanitary. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 88. Findings included: a) Oven At approximately 11:25 AM on 11/11/24, during a tour of the kitchen, the oven was noted to have grease covering the windows. Upon inspection of the inside of the oven, there was noted to be spillage and grease inside the oven. Pieces of food were laying on the floor of the oven. The Culinary Director (CD) was asked how often the oven was cleaned. The CD stated the oven was cleaned once a week or once every two weeks. When asked if the oven is cleaned upon noticing spillage, as was evident, the CD stated It should be.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order regarding blood pressure checks in a restricted arm due to a mastectomy for Residents #28 and #24, and to follow physician orders for Resident #88's fall safety devices to assist in prevention of injury for a resident with a diagnosis and history of repeated falls. This was true for three (3) of 32 reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #28, #24, #88. Facility Census: 88. Findings included: a) Resident #28 At approximately 2:05 PM on 11/12/24, during a review of Resident #28's record, it was determined the resident had an order for no blood pressures to be taken in her left arm, due to a mastectomy. Resident #28 has an order entered for the blood pressures, which reads as follows: Blood pressures to be done on right side due to breast mastectomy. No directions specified for order. Resident #28 is also care planned for no blood pressures or lab draws from her left arm due to a mastectomy. During review it was found the facility took blood pressures in Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms accurately for Residents #14, #72, #30. This was found to be true for 3 of 32 care plans reviewed. Resident Identifiers #14, #72, #30. Facility Census:88 . Findings included: a) Resident #14 On 11/12/24 at 2:49 PM during record review on 11/12/24 found the [NAME] Virginia POST form had Resident #14 marked as a female Further record review on 11/12/24 of the Resident Profiled and admission Record revealed the resident as a male. During an interview on 11/12/24 with the Director of Nursing (DON) #94 confirmed the POST form was coded incorrectly and stated yes that's not correct. b) Resident #72 On 11/12/24 at 3:20 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #72. The review found the Physician's Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) did not list the preparer's signature and date. On 11/13/24 at 10:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified. The DON stated, we will get this corrected. c) Resident #30 At approximately 4:00 PM on 11/11/24, a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, observation, record interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible to Resident #55 and to have sufficient equipment to ensure Resident #25 could get out of bed to attend Resident Council. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #55, #25 Facility Census 88. Findings included: a) Resident #55 On 11/11/24 at 3:20 PM, Resident was in room in wheelchair and stated that she wanted to go to bed. Her call light was on the bed and not within reach. On 11/11/24 3:22 PM, an interview with Nurse Aide (NA) #40 who acknowledged that the call light was not in the reach of the resident. She picked up the resident's call light and handed it to her stating, I'm sorry Ms. (resident's name) I did not know you did not have your call light. On 11/12/24 at 1:00 PM review of resident's records revealed the following: Care plan- Focus Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Self Care Performance deficit, requires staff assistance with ADL's related to impaired mobility, non-ambulatory, generalized weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and resident, family, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor Resident #30's choices by ensuring she was able to leave the facility with family members, by not allowing her to leave, due to the fact she is on oxygen. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for choices during the survey process. Resident identifier: #30. Facility census: 88. Findings included: A) Resident #30 At approximately 1:45 PM on 11/11/24, an interview was conducted with Resident #30. During the interview, Resident #30 stated I'm not allowed to leave the building with my oxygen tank. I was supposed to go to my house and they wouldn ' t let me leave. About three (3) weeks ago, my daughter came to pick me up, and when I started to leave, (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #37's name) stood up and told me I was not allowed to leave with my oxygen tank. She called the head nurse and then a nurse from upstairs came down and told me I could not leave the building with my oxygen tank. It's like a prison here. At approximately 1:00 PM on 11/13/24, an interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Resident #74 the right to private communication and ensure mail was delivered on Saturdays. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #74. Facility Census: 88. Findings included: a) Resident #74 On 11/11/24 - During the Resident Council meeting, Resident #74 reported he does not get mail on Saturdays. He stated he gets the previous Sunday's church bulletin usually on Mondays. The Activities Director reported that sometimes the mail is dropped under the ledge on Saturdays and the mail is not always delivered. On 11/12/24 at 11:35 AM - The State Surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator concerning Resident Council Concerns. The Nursing Home Administrator reported the Activities Director was in the process of educating the activities staff on this date to deliver the resident's personal mail on Saturdays. On 11/14/24 at 10:40 AM - Record review of the Policies and Procedures for Resident's Rights stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$58,780 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $48,133 — penalty dated 2023-09-28
• $10,647 — penalty dated 2023-08-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV