Wayne Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 59.3 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's call lights were within reach, and to ensure residents did not have long waits for call lights to be answered. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers #6, #21, and #27. Facility Census: 59Findings Included: a) Resident #21 On 05/19/26 at12:00 PM, it was observed that Rsident #21 was laying in her bed trying to reach her call bell on the floor beside her bed causing her to almost roll out of the bed. Registered Nurse #34 was alerted, came into the room, and confirmed she was unable to get her call light and began to assist her. b) Resident # 27 On 05/20/26 at 11:59 AM Resident #27 was heard calling out for help. She was observed sitting in her wheelchair, near the foot of her bed, while her call bell was clipped to her pillow at the head of the bed and out of her reach. Registered Nurse #34 was alerted and came into the room, confirmed her call light was not within reach, then assisted putting her back into bed. c)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, observation and staff interview facility failed to ensure meals are prepared and served in methods to conserve nutritive value, flavor, appearance and in a pleasing, palatable presentation. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #49, #28, #39, #18, #24,#12, #9 , #47 and #15. Facility census: 59. Findings includeA) Regulation review for 483.60 (d) reads in part.-Food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance.-Food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.B) During dining observations on 05/19/2026 at around 12:45 PM Resident (49) reports, the vegetables would be better if it wasn't mushy., Resident (28) diet slip shows resident is to have double portions however did not receive double portion of lasagna nor cauliflower. Resident (39) reports this cauliflower is too mushy and brown, Resident (18) diet slip shows dysphagia puree, to receive puree breaded chicken patty for meal however received puree lasagna.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to the resident's personal products and unsanitary practices. Resident Identifier: #27. Facility census: 59Findings Included: During a facility walk-through on 05/20/26 at 12:10 PM, we observed 1 wheelchair (w/c) in the A hallway with holes in the seat, exposing the inner padding near the front left screw and 1 Geri-Chair located outside the Central Shower Room with rips and tears down both sides of the back rest and on the right armrest, exposing the inner padding. On 5/20/26 at 2:00 PM, during an interview/walk-through with the Infection Preventionist, the B Hall Nurse manager was present. She confirmed the wheel chair and Geri-Chair had tears and holes exposing inner padding and stated the facility would remove and repair them.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #23's date of an acute care transfer, the indication of a medication for Resident #3 and pressure ulcer staging for Resident #12. This was true for three (3) of 23 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #23, #3 and #12. Facility Census: 59. Findings Include: a) Resident #23 On 03/26/25 at 10:22 AM, an initial interview was held with Resident #23. Resident #23 stated, I had to go to the hospital .I was so sick. The record review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 12/04/24 due to an abnormal abdominal x-ray. The date documented on the transfer form was 08/14/24. Upon further review, the fax confirmation sheet had the date circled with a notation stating wrong date. (Typed as written.) On 03/26/25 at 6:05 PM, the Administrator confirmed the date on the transfer form was incorrect. b) Resident #3 On 03/27/25 at 10:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #3. The review found the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on document review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the family of one (1) of seven (7) residents that the resident had sustained a fall and was transferred to the hospital. Resident identifier: #111. Facility census: 59. Findings include: a) Resident #111 On 03/26/25 at approximately 3:55 p.m., upon review of the resident's change of condition form, it is documented resident own poa (power of attorney). The surveyor could not locate in the electronic medical record where family emergency contact was contacted regarding the resident's serious accident and transfer to the hospital. b) On 03/27/25 at approximately 11:02 a.m., interview with employee #55 the employee verified that there was no documentation that family was notified regarding the significant change in the resident's condition. This was also acknowledged by the facility's Administrator upon exit on 03/27/25 at approximately 4:15 p.m.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman of an acute care transfer for Resident #23. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident Identifier: #23. Facility Census: 59. Findings Include: a) Resident #23 On 03/26/25 at 10:22 AM, an initial interview was held with Resident #23. Resident #23 stated, I've had to go to the hospital, I was pretty sick. A record review was completed on 03/26/25 at 1:30 PM. The review found the resident had been sent to an acute care facility on 08/14/24 for an abnormal abdominal x-ray. On 03/26/25 at 6:05 PM, an interview was held with the Administrator. The Administrator confirmed the State Ombudsman was not notified of the resident's transfer. The Administrator stated, we don't have the Ombudsman notification for 08/14/24.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop the care plan, which included all diagnoses for Resident #57. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #57. Facility census: 59. Findings include: a) Resident #57 On 03/26/25 at 2:52 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #57. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The review found the care plan did not include all diagnoses for Resident #57. The following diagnoses were not included: --generalized muscle weakness --difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified --dysphagia, oral phase --personal history of transient ischemic attach (TIA) --cerebral infarction without residual deficits (CVA) --essential (primary) hypertension (HTN) --hyperlipidemia, unspecified (HLD) --type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified (DM) --hypothyroidism, unspecified --benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  b) Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's comprehensive care plan showed the following focus, The resident is at risk for pain/discomfort r/t [related to] history of left femur fracture repair s/p [status post] ORIF [open reduction internal fixation], rheumatoid arthritis, muscle spasms, diabetic neuropathy, restless leg syndrome, edema, PVD [peripheral vascular disease]. The following intervention was initiated on 09/26/24, Provide medication, Ultram, per orders. Monitor for s/sx [signs and symptoms] of side effects. Evaluate effectiveness of medication. Review of Resident #13's physicians' orders showed the resident was currently receiving gabapentin twice a day for nerve pain and Tylenol three (3) times a day for pain. The resident had received Ultram as needed from 09/25/24 through 10/09/24 and Ultram two (2) times a day from 02/03/25 through 02/17/25. On 03/26/25 at 5:04 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #14 confirmed Resident #13's comprehensive care plan had not been revised when the resident's Ultram for pain had been discontinued. No further information was provided through the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record Review and Staff interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided in a timely manner for a resident with a fall with major injury for 1 out of 7 residents reviewed for falls. Resident identifier: #27. Facility Census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #27 On 12/30/24, the resident had an unwitnessed fall. The incident note on 12/30/24 at 10:20 AM stated, This UCN (Unit Charge Nurse) noted resident laying on the floor in hallway by window sitting on bottom with leg extended in front of him. Resident stated, I think I broke my hip. Assess resident no signs of injury at this time. After getting resident back into wheelchair, resident denies pain with ROM. The Progress Note stated, the Nurse Practitioner was contacted and new orders were obtained for x-ray of the right hip and pelvis. No complaints of pain at this time were documented and the Power of Attorney was notified. On 12/31/2024 at 6:07 PM, x-ray of right hip and pelvis was completed. On 01/01/2025 at 5:36 AM, the nurse's progress note stated that x-ray results were not obtained on this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to follow accepted procedures for transmission-based precautions. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #26 and #22. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #26 The facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, with approval effective date 04/01/25, stated that, for residents in enhanced barrier precautions, a sign would be posted on the resident's door to indicate enhanced barrier precautions were required. Review of Resident #26's physicians' orders showed the resident had the following order written on 03/18/25, Enhanced barrier precautions related to: dressing. When dressing/bathing, showering/transferring in room or therapy gym/personal hygiene, changing linen, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting. The resident also had an order written…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNICARE HEALTH — 110 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $649K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV