Regency At Bluffs Park
355 Huronview Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI 48103 · For profit - Corporation · 71 certified beds · (734) 887-8700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,852 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-28)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.3% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.6% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.4% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.4% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.9% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.4% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.1% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 334 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.2%CMS range 57.3–68.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 9.1–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 86.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.4%CMS range 6.3–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 65.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall for one (R200) of three residents reviewed, resulting in major injury.Findings include:A review of the clinical record revealed R200 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypotension, muscle wasting and atrophy, malaise and Liver cell carcinoma. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R200 scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated intact cognition). Review of Section GG: Functional Limitation in Range of Motion revealed the following:Lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot)-impairment on one side. Lying to sitting on side of bed: The ability to move from lying on the back to sitting on the side of the bed and with no back support-substantial/maximal assistance. Sit to stand: The ability to come to a standing position from sitting in a chair, wheelchair, or on the side of the bed-substantial/maximal assistanceToilet transfer: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00140976, MI00140959 & MI00141121. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a through assessment after a change of condition, in 2 of 7 reviewed for assessment (Resident #1 and #5), resulting in a delay in treatment and services. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he admitted to the nursing home on 8/15/23; had the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, lung disease) and heart failure. R1's EMR indicated he had transferred to the hospital 4 times since he admitted to the facility. R1's most recent re-admission was 10/23/23. R1's Care Plan dated 8/18/23, revealed he planned to return to the community after rehabilitation, to live with his daughter and grandchildren. R1's goal was to demonstrate correct administration of medications, treatments, and activities of daily living (ADL) to the level needed for a safe return to the community. R1's Oxygen Saturation Summary report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00140976, MI00140959 & MI00141121. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors in 6 of 7 residents reviewed for medication errors (Resident #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7), resulting in a transfer to the hospital for assessment and treatment (Resident #1 & #5), and the potential for a change in condition (Resident #3, #4, #6, and #7). Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he admitted to the nursing home on 8/15/23; had the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, lung disease) and heart failure. R1's EMR indicated he had transferred to the hospital 4 times since he admitted to the facility. R1's most recent re-admission was 10/23/23. R1's Care Plan dated 8/18/23, revealed he planned to return to the community after rehabilitation, to live with his daughter and grandchildren. R1's goal was to demonstrate correct administration of medications, treatments, and activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-02-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed timely by competent staff and according to standards of practice for one (Resident #60) of one reviewed for death, resulting in delayed CPR and the potential for ineffective CPR efforts and death. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #60 (R60) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft(s) without angina pectoris, hypertension (high blood pressure), kidney transplant status, malignant neoplasm of kidney (except renal pelvis) and acute kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) history reflected R60 died in the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record reflected R60 was a full code (full resuscitation and life sustaining treatment). The Miscellaneous tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected the code status document was effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake M100134151 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor for ongoing/worsening bruising, inflammation, and monitor/treat pain timely; complete physician notification and additional testing for 1 (Resident # 8) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care resulting in delayed identification and treatment of a fractured femur, and increased pain. Findings include: Resident # 8 (R8) initially admitted to facility 8/4/2021 with most recent facility readmission 1/11/23 with diagnoses including COVID-19, unspecified fracture of left femur, muscle weakness, unspecified atrial fibrillation, embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the upper extremities, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/17/23 revealed that R8 had unclear speech, was usually understood and understands, and that a Brief Interview for Mental Status was not conducted. Staff assessment for mental status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall from bed during resident care for one (Resident #60) of three reviewed for accidents, resulting in R60 being rolled away from staff and falling out of bed during care. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #60 (R60) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft(s) without angina pectoris, hypertension (high blood pressure), kidney transplant status, malignant neoplasm of kidney (except renal pelvis) and acute kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) history reflected R60 died in the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record reflected R60 was a full code (full resuscitation and life sustaining treatment). The Miscellaneous tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected the code status document was effective [DATE] and was uploaded to the medical record on [DATE]. A Progress Note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the care plan for one (R200) of three residents reviewed. Findings include:A review of the clinical record revealed R200 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypotension, muscle wasting and atrophy, malaise and Liver cell carcinoma. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R200 scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated intact cognition). Review of Section GG: Functional Limitation in Range of Motion revealed the following:Lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot)-impairment on one side. Lying to sitting on side of bed: The ability to move from lying on the back to sitting on the side of the bed and with no back support-substantial/maximal assistance. Sit to stand: The ability to come to a standing position from sitting in a chair, wheelchair, or on the side of the bed-substantial/maximal assistanceToilet transfer: The ability to get on and off a toilet or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 58 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 04/15/25 at 09:24 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Manager G. The following items were noted: The Juice Machine interior surfaces (backsplash, undersplash, drip tray assembly) were observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. Dietary Manager G indicated she would have staff thoroughly clean and sanitize the Juice Machine as soon as possible. The Vulcan stove/oven backsplash and stove top burners were observed soiled (black) with accumulated and encrusted carbonized/caramelized food residue. The Vulcan interior and exterior surfaces were also observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. The Vulcan convection oven side exterior surface was further observed soiled (black) with accumulated and encrusted food residue. Dietary Manager G indicated she would have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 60 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, reduced air quality, and potential cross-connections between the potable (drinking) and non-potable (non-drinking) water supplies. Findings include: On 04/16/25 at 08:30 A.M., A common area environmental tour was conducted with Maintenance Director I. The following items were noted: Jefferson Shower Room: The return-air-exhaust ventilation grill was observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits. Maintenance Director I indicated he would have housekeeping thoroughly clean and sanitize the soiled grill assembly as soon as possible. [NAME] Staff Break Room: The Men's and Women's Restroom return-air-exhaust ventilation grills were observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits. Maintenance Director I indicated he would have housekeeping…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for 14 out of 14 residents (Resident # 5, 7, 13, 15, 18, 25, 37, 48, 51, 69, 333, 335, 340, 341) allegations of abuse were reported to the state agency. Findings Included: Resident #5 (R5): Review of the grievance log revealed that on 3/7/2025, R5 had put in a grievance that it tool one and a half hours to get assistance to use the bathroom, and she had missed her shower two times. The grievance further revealed, I (R5) was told to get a private aid. NO! Hire more help. The resolution was to continue to hire more staff. Abuse was not identified, R5 refused to sign the facility's resolution. Resident #7 (R7): Review of the grievance log revealed that on 2/10/2025, R7's daughter put in a grievance that if R7 did not take a shower then she would have a refusal. No resolution was noted regarding showers. Resident #13 (R13): Review of the grievance log revealed that on 12/09/2024, R13 put in a grievance that she had gone to the kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for 14 out of 14 residents (Resident # 5, 7, 13, 15, 18, 25, 37, 48, 51, 69, 333, 335, 340, 341) allegations of abuse were identified and investigated. Findings Included: Resident #5 (R5): Review of the grievance log revealed that on 3/7/2025, R5 had put in a grievance that it tool one and a half hours to get assistance to use the bathroom, and she had missed her shower two times. The grievance further revealed, I (R5) was told to get a private aid. NO! Hire more help. The resolution was to continue to hire more staff. Abuse was not identified, R5 refused to sign the facility's resolution. No investigation for an allegation of abuse was conducted. Resident #7 (R7): Review of the grievance log revealed that on 2/10/2025, R7's daughter put in a grievance that if R7 did not take a shower then she would have a refusal. No resolution was noted regarding showers. No investigation for an allegation of abuse was conducted. Resident #13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 04/16/25 at 02:20 PM during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse U and V they reported the facility was understaffed and there was not enough Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) to meet the needs of the residents. During this interview CNA T interrupted the interview reporting to LPN U and LPN V that she could not locate the other CNA that was assigned to the same hall. CNA T elaborated that she was fed up with the other CNA because they always hide and do not take care of their assigned residents leaving CNA T with her residents (approximately 15 residents) and the other CNA's assignment (another 15 residents) CNA T stated she cant take care of 30 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to respond to resident needs timely for five of 15 reviewed (R1, R14, R22, R48 and R62). Findings include: In an interview on 4/15/25 at 10:23 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C reported they were caring for 16 residents that shift (day shift),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one resident (resident #52) of four residents reviewed for dignity. Review of the clinical record Resident # 52 (R52) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include compression fracture and cognitive deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R52 scored 9 out of 15 (moderate cognitive) on Brief Interview Status Score for Mental Status (BIMS) . On 04/15/25 at 10:37 AM R52 was observed resting in bed, next to the bed was a recliner chair, a pillow was on the chair and on top of the pillow was a pile of un-bagged pile of linen smeared with feces. The pile of un-bagged soiled linen sat approximately 2 to 3 feet away from R52's face. R52 was observed again 31 minutes later with the soiled linen still on the reclining chair. On 04/23/25 at 12:40 PM, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) R reported the process for providing care for an incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for three of three residents (Resident 25, 48, & 51) resulting in feelings of anger, embarrassment, degrading, feeling not important. Findings Included: Resident 51 (R51): Per the facility face sheet R51 had resided at the facility since 7/23/2024. On 4/16/2025 at 2:58 PM, R51 was visited in his room. R51 stated that he wore a brief, but stated he knew when he had to urinate, and have a bowel movement. R51 said staff who put briefs on him have not ever offered to allow him to wear his own underwear, and said he was not sure if he even had underwear in his room with his own belongings. With permission R52's top dresser drawer was opened, and several pairs of underwear were observed to be in the drawer that were R51's underwear. R51 stated he had no idea those pairs of underwear were there in the drawer, and again stated no one had ever offered him to wear his own underwear instead of a brief. An urinal was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide advanced written notice prior to a room change for one Residents (#30), of one residents reviewed for room changes. Findings include: Resident #30 (R30) Review of the medical record reflected R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included difficulty in walking. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/19/25, reflected R30 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 4/15/25 at 10:30 AM, R30 was observed in her room resting in bed. R30 expressed frustration with the lack of communication at the facility. R30 stated that she has had several room changes and typically, staff would not give her any notice and would state that they were moving her that day. R30 stated she had a variety of roommates and questioned the compatibility of a few of her previous roommates. Review of R30's room change history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a seatbelt as potential restraint for one (Resident #10) of one reviewed. Resident #10 (R10) R10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy and anoxic brain damage. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/2/25, reflected R10 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of R10's Care Plan revealed R10 was dependent on two staff members with the use of a mechanical Hoyer lift for transfers. On 4/15/25 12:35 PM, R10 was observed in his room, sitting on a motorized wheelchair. R10 had a seatbelt across his lap. R10 was unable to self release his seatbelt. R10 stated due to limited use of only one hand, he knew he would not be able to release the seatbelt independently. R10 reported he had never been asked if he could release the seatbelt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers were offered and completed per resident preference for one out of four residents (Resident #30). Findings include: Resident #30 (R30) Review of the medical record reflected R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included difficulty in walking. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/19/25, reflected R30 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 4/15/25 at 10:30 AM, R30 was observed in her room resting in bed. R30 expressed frustration with the lack of communication at the facility. R30 stated that she has had several room changes and typically, staff would not give her any notice and would state that they were moving her that day. R30 also stated that due to the constant room changes, she believes her shower days were mixed up, therefore, R30 had missed some of her scheduled shower days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prevention of a fall for one (Resident #10) of two reviewed for falls. Findings include: Resident #10 (R10) R10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy and anoxic brain damage. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/2/25, reflected R10 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of R10's Care Plan revealed R10 was dependent on two staff members with the use of a mechanical Hoyer lift for transfers. On 4/15/25 12:35 PM, R10 was observed in his room, sitting on a motorized wheelchair. R10 had a seatbelt across his lap. R10 reported that he fell out of chair recently. R10 explained that staff had transferred him to his wheelchair and after being placed in his wheelchair, staff had forgotten to put the armrest on his chair down. R10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Occupational Therapy (OT) services as ordered for one (R22) of two reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R22 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included fusion of the spine and dependence on renal dialysis. At the time of review, R22's Admission/Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/10/25 was In Progress. On 4/15/25 at 10:50 AM, R22 was observed in bed, wearing a Miami J cervical collar (type of neck brace). R22 reported they were supposed to receive Physical Therapy (PT) and OT five times per week, for one hour per day, but were receiving less. R22 reported the facility was discussing discharge due to lack of progress and stated, how can I progress if they don't work with me more? In an interview on 4/17/25 at 9:48 AM, Physical Therapist (PT) E reported there were times therapy was unable to work with R22 during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure appropriate use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one (R7) of three reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP); and 2) ensure appropriate hand hygiene. Findings include: Resident #7 (R7): Review of the medical record reflected R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included pain in thoracic spine and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission/Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/2/25, reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 04/15/25 at 12:20 PM, R7's room door was observed to be open, with a droplet precaution sign and PPE hanging on the exterior of the door. Two staff members were observed in the room, each wearing a gown, gloves and an N95 mask. Neither of the staff members were observed wearing eye protection. At 12:23 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00149652. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary supplies to perform oral care for one (R5) of three reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Brief Interview Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) dated 1/31/25 revealed R5 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact). On 2/3/25 at 11:34 AM, R5 was observed self-ambulating back to bed from the bathroom. R5 reported they had been in the facility for five days and had not been provided a toothbrush, toothpaste, or mouth wash and therefore had not had oral care since admission. On 2/4/25 at 9:16 AM, R5 was observed sitting on the edge of their bed. R5 reported they still had not received the necessary supplies to complete oral care. In an interview on 2/4/25 at 9:18 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F reported R5 required very light assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and did most care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00149652. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow-up on a change in vital signs for one (R2) of three reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included infection and inflammatory reaction due to cardiac and vascular devices, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), history of cardiac arrest, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/6/24 revealed R2 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Physician's Order dated 5/1/24 revealed an order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute continuously to maintain an oxygen level of 90% or better. This order was discontinued 6/24/24 as R2 was weaned off oxygen. Review of the Physician's Order dated 5/31/24 revealed check pulse ox (oximetry) on room air. Try to wean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00149652. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to completed bladder scans and intermittent straight catheterization as ordered by the physician for one (R2) of two reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included retention of urine. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/6/24 revealed R2 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/14/24 revealed PVR [post void residual/bladder scan] q 6 hours [every 6 hours]. ISC [intermittent straight catheter] if greater than 250 cc [cubic centimeter/1 cc is equal to 1 milliliter] and notify [Nurse Practitioner]. Review of the Physician's Order dated 6/18/24 revealed Bladder Scan PVR Q6hours, if unable to void and greater than 250cc then straight cath and place note in [doctor] book. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00149652. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of urine culture results for one (R2) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included retention of urine. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/6/24 revealed R2 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of R2's urinalysis dated 6/3/24 revealed a urine culture was pending. Review of the Nurse Practitioner Note dated 6/4/24 revealed Urine positive for LE [leukocyte esterase] - Await culture as patient is asymptomatic. On 2/4/25 at 10:44 AM, R2's urine culture results were requested from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A. Review of the urine culture results collected 6/3/24 and resulted 6/6/24 revealed R2's urine culture was positive for over 100,000 cfu/mL (colony forming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00149652. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure urine culture results were in the medical record for one (R2) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included retention of urine. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/6/24 revealed R2 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of R2's urinalysis dated 6/3/24 revealed a urine culture was pending. Review of the Nurse Practitioner Note dated 6/4/24 revealed Urine positive for LE [leukocyte esterase] - Await culture as patient is asymptomatic. R2's medical record did not include urine culture results. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation that R2's urine culture results were received. On 2/4/25 at 10:44 AM, R2's urine culture results were requested from Nursing Home Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen resulting in an increased potential for cross contamination of food and foodborne illness, potentially affecting the facility's total census of 54 residents who receive meal services (2 nothing by mouth residents, or NPO) out of the facility's total census of 56 residents. Findings include: On 4/23/24 at 11:26 AM, at 11:32 AM and at 12:11 PM, Dietary aide, staff DD, was observed not using a hand barrier to shut off the faucet when done washing their hands. On 4/23/24 at 11:54 AM, the surveyor requested the facility's hand hygiene policy from Dietary Manager, staff AA, to review. At this time the surveyor asked staff AA if they had conducted any trainings with staff on the proper procedure to wash their hands to which they stated, Yes, and we have a sign posted at our sinks. On 4/23/24 at 11:37 AM, and at 11:58 AM, Chef, staff CC, was observed not using a hand barrier to shut off the faucet when done washing their hands. On 4/23/24 at 11:43 AM, Registered Dietitian,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet residents' needs, as voiced by 6 resident and family interviews (Resident #19, 41, 42, 50, 167, and 323), from a total sample of 14 residents, resulting in unmet needs. Resident #19 Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #19 (R19) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included difficulty in walking, shortness of breath, repeated falls, and paralytic gait. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/3/24 revealed R19 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). In an observation and interview on 04/23/24 at 2:59 PM, R19 was in her room watching television. R19 reported that she felt staffing was an issue. When asked to explain, R19 stated that at home, her normal routine was to wake up at 6:00 AM, rest in the recliner until 9:00 AM when her home health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for the facilities census of 56 residents and its staff resulting in an increased potential for harm. Findings include: On 4/23/24 between 2:22 PM, and 2:48 PM, during an environmental tour of the facility the following observations were made: An accumulation of dust and debris was observed on the flooring of the [NAME] Hall's dietary storage closet. Two physical therapy cold compresses were observed stored in the activity room's freezer designated for food storage only. Lift batteries and charging stations were observed being stored in the first and second floor's soiled utility rooms. On 4/23/24 at 2:26 PM, the surveyor inquired Housekeeping Supervisor, Staff EE, on if the lift batteries and charging stations would normally be stored in a soiled utility room to which they replied, I think they always have been, but we can move them to a cleaner area.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the dignity for 2 (Resident # 42 and 50) of 2 residents reviewed resulting in anger, frustration and the potential for decreased self worth. Findings include: Resident #42 Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #42 (R42) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of ribs, muscle weakness, orthostatic hypotension (drop in blood pressure upon standing), hemiplegia and hemiparalysis following cerebral infarction affecting non dominant left side (weakness and/or total loss of function on left side of body after experiencing a stroke), bilateral chronic angle closure glaucoma (bulging of the iris resulting in fluid and pressure build up in the eye), and bilateral blepharitis (inflammation of the eyelids). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/17/24 revealed R42 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide repair services for a power wheelchair in a timely manner for one (R19) of one residents reviewed for adaptive equipment, resulting in resident dissatisfaction and reduced resident independence with wheelchair mobility. Findings Include: Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #19 (R19) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included difficulty in walking, shortness of breath, repeated falls, and paralytic gait. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/3/24 revealed R19 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Care Plan revealed R19 required assistance of one staff member for toileting and the use of a hemi walker. On 04/23/24 at 2:59 PM, R19 was observed in her room watching television. R19 was seated in a standard wheelchair. A power wheelchair was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (Resident #s 5 and #22 ) of 14 reviewed for MDS assessments, resulting in the potential for inaccurate care plans and unmet care needs. Resident 5 (R5) Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] reflected R5 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. MDS section B question 0200 of the MDS reflected R5 had adequate hearing - no difficulty in normal conversation, social interaction, listening to TV. (with or without use of hearing aid or hearing appliances if normally used) and did not use a hearing aid. Section B 0300 Hearing aid or other hearing appliance used was coded as No. On 4/23/24 at approximately 11:00 am R5 was observed resting in bed, R5 initially did not respond to any questions, then stated I cant hear you. Multiple methods attempts were made to interview R5/getting closer, deeper tone etc however R5 was not able…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 1 (Resident #42) of 14 reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs and continued falls. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #42 (R42) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of ribs, muscle weakness, orthostatic hypotension (drop in blood pressure upon standing), hemiplegia and hemiparalysis following cerebral infarction affecting non dominant left side (weakness and/or total loss of function on left side of body after experiencing a stroke), bilateral chronic angle closure glaucoma (bulging of the iris resulting in fluid and pressure build up in the eye), and bilateral blepharitis (inflammation of the eyelids). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/17/24 revealed R42 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure communication services were available and appropriately utilized by staff for one (Resident #42) of two residents reviewed for communication. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #42 (R42) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of ribs, muscle weakness, orthostatic hypotension (drop in blood pressure upon standing), hemiplegia and hemiparalysis following cerebral infarction affecting non dominant left side (weakness and/or total loss of function on left side of body after experiencing a stroke), bilateral chronic angle closure glaucoma (bulging of the iris resulting in fluid and pressure build up in the eye), and bilateral blepharitis (inflammation of the eyelids). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/17/24 revealed R42 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for contracture management for one resident (#3) of one resident reviewed. Findings Included: Resident #3 (R3) Review of the medical record demonstrated R3 was admitted to the facility 02/22/2013 with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity, macular degeneration, insomnia, bradycardia, depression, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), anxiety, dementia, amputation of the left leg above the knee, acquired club foot,(deformity of the foot when compromised nerve connections o irregular blood vessels in the lower extremity due to injury or illness), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), pain in right leg, atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of plaque in vessels) , colostomy, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic ischemic heart disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent falls for one (Resident #42) of 1 reviewed for falls, resulting in recurrent falls and the potential for serious injury. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #42 (R42) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple fractures of ribs, muscle weakness, orthostatic hypotension (drop in blood pressure upon standing), hemiplegia and hemiparalysis following cerebral infarction affecting non dominant left side (weakness and/or total loss of function on left side of body after experiencing a stroke), bilateral chronic angle closure glaucoma (bulging of the iris resulting in fluid and pressure build up in the eye), and bilateral blepharitis (inflammation of the eyelids). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/17/24 revealed R42 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain medications were given as ordered for two (resident #45 and #269) of three reviewed, resulting in increased pain and the potential for unmanaged pain. Findings include: Resident #45(R45) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R45 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included breast cancer, bone cancer, secondary cancer of liver and bile duct, chronic pain, stage 3 pressure wound(full thickness tissue loss), hip fracture and malnutrition. The MDS reflected R45 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 14 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact. Continued review of the MDS reflected R45 described pain as severe, almost constant pain and received both scheduled and as needed pain medications During an observation on 4/23/24 at 10:05 AM, CNA staff entered R45 room and answered call light. R45 was overheard reporting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for two residents (Resident #7, 42) out of 56 residents, resulting in the potential for unauthorized access to medications, medication errors, and the potential for adverse reactions/side effects. Findings include: Resident #7 Review of the facesheet revealed Resident #7 (R7) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included obstructive sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/22/24 revealed R42 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). In an observation and interview on 04/23/24 at 11:54 PM, R7 was observed in her room and looking out the window. Two inhalers were observed on the bed of R7. R7 reported that they are her inhalers. She has kept them in the top drawer for about a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to justify the use of an antipsychotic medication for one (Resident #5) of five reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 (R5) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, visual hallucinations, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/5/24 revealed R5 had modified independence with cognitive skills for daily decision making. On 04/24/24 at 2:40 PM, R5 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. R5 was pleasant and carried on a conversation about what she had for lunch that day. Review of the Physician's Order history revealed on 3/30/23 R5 was prescribed 75 mg of Quetiapine (Seroquel-antipsychotic medication) at bedtime for depression with delirium. On 4/11/23, the dose was reduced to 50 mg at bedtime for depression and delirium. On 5/24/23, the dose was further reduced to 25 mg at bedtime for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to remove/discard expired ready-to-eat food products, effecting 59 residents that consume meals from the facility kitchen, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and resident foodborne illness. Findings include: On 01/30/23 at 09:13 A.M., A tour of the food production kitchen was conducted with Chef C, the walk in cooler was observed to have cottage cheese with a Best by used date of 1/15/23 individual cottage cheese cups pre made and ready for delivery were made from that container per Chef C. A large container of Italian dressing was labeled with an open date of 11/23 and a discard date of 12/23. Opened applesauce container with handwritten date of 1/15, box of onions dated 1/17, box oranges dated 12/20, box lemons dated 12/13, box of cucumbers dated 1/24, box pork hand written on outside of the box dated 1/17, in the box 4 separate vacuumed packed packages pf pork was observed. An undated wrapped pre made salad was observed along with a clear plastic container…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain comfortable room temperatures for 8 residents (#'s1, 39, 114, 117, 118, 119, 256, 268 ) of 8 reviewed for ambient room temperatures and room [ROOM NUMBER]-2, resulting in discomfort of feeling cold and anger. Findings include: Resident#114 According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/18/23, Resident 114 (R114) scored 15 of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. During the initial screening process on 1/30/23 that started at approximately 10:00 am, R114 reported his room had not had heat all weekend and he was told by staff that the heating system had been out for days. R114 stated he ate meals in his room and would like to sit near the window for the scenery (there was a fresh snow fall), but could not sit there due to the already frigid room temperature. Upon this surveyor leaving R114's room he requested to leave the door open in the hopes if there was any heat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate completion of advance directive information for 1 (Resident #268) of 2 residents reviewed for advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility. Findings include: Review of the MICHIGAN DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE PROCEDURE ACT, Act 193 of 1996 (Revised 3-25-14), revealed that, An order executed under this section shall be on a form described in section 4. The order shall be dated and executed voluntarily and signed by each of the following persons: (a) The declarant, the declarant's patient advocate, or another person who, at the time of the signing, is in the presence of the declarant and acting pursuant to the directions of the declarant. (b) The declarant's attending physician. (c) Two witnesses [AGE] years of age or older, at least 1 of whom is not the declarant's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake M100134151 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely identify, investigate, and report an injury of unknown origin to the Nursing Home Administrator, and failed to report the injury of unknown origin to the State Agency for 1 (resident # 8) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse resulting in delayed investigation, identification, and treatment of a fracture and the potential for further injuries of unknown origin to go unreported. Findings include: Resident # 8 (R8) initially admitted to facility 8/4/2021 with most recent facility readmission 1/11/23 with diagnoses including COVID-19, unspecified fracture of left femur, muscle weakness, unspecified atrial fibrillation, embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the upper extremities, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/17/23 revealed that R8 had unclear speech, was usually understood and understands, and that a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely completion of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (Resident #5) of 17 reviewed for MDS, resulting in a late MDS assessment and the potential for further late assessments. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #5 (R5) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included delusional disorder and insomnia. On 02/01/23 at 02:20 PM, review of R5's MDS history reflected the annual MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/10/22, was completed on 9/3/22. During an interview on 02/06/23 at 01:10 PM, MDS Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF reported an annual MDS was to be completed within 14 days after the ARD. LPN FF acknowledged R5's annual MDS with an ARD of 8/10/22 was late and was completed on 9/3/22. According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October, 2019, .Annual Assessment .The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) for one (Resident #13) of 17 reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS), resulting in the potential for inaccurate Care Plans and unmet needs. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #13 (R13) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, unspecified hearing loss (bilateral/both sides), unspecified dementia and major depressive disorder. On 01/30/23 at 12:28 PM, R13 was observed seated in a recliner, in her room, with her head down and eyes closed. A meal tray was in front of her with the plate cover still on. The plastic wrapper was still covering her plate with cheesecake. Lids were observed on her beverage cups. The Admission/Medicare 5 day MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/26/22, reflected R13 scored 11 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was coded to accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #5) of 17 reviewed for MDS, resulting for the potential for inaccurate Care Plans and unmet needs. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #5 (R5) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included delusional disorder and insomnia. R5's medical record revealed a Preadmission SCREENING (PAS)/ANNUAL RESIDENT REVIEW (ARR) Level I Screening (form DCH-3877), dated 3/14/22, which reflected R5 was marked as having a current diagnosis of mental illness and had received treatment for mental illness. A Comprehensive Level II Evaluation, with a submission date of 3/21/22, was noted in R5's medical record. An attached letter reflected a Level II Evaluation was needed by 3/27/23 if R5 remained in the nursing facility. R5's annual MDS, with an ARD of 8/10/22, revealed question A1500 for, Preadmission Screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for one (Resident #36) of 17 residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for additional skin breakdown as well as unmet care needs and services. Findings include: Resident # 36 (R36) was initially admitted to facility 12/20/22 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, dysphagia, COVID 19, muscle weakness, age related osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, malignant neoplasm of female breast, and malignant neoplasm of esophagus. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/22 revealed that resident was understood and understands with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. Section G of MDS revealed that R36 required 2-person extensive assist with bed mobility and toilet use, 2-person limited assist with transfers, 1-person extensive assist with dressing, eating, and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of six medication carts and two of four medication rooms reviewed were free of expired medications resulting in the potential for decreased medication efficacy and adverse side effects. Findings include: On 2/1/23 at 10:29 AM, [NAME] Hall Medication Cart was reviewed in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF. During the review, it was noted that R26 had an Insulin Lispro (Humalog) Kwikpen with the date opened indicated to be 12/26/22 and an Erythromycin 0.5% (percent) Eye Ointment with the date opened indicated to be 10/13/22. In an interview with LPN FF at the time of the medication cart review, LPN FF referenced the Omnicare Insulin Storage Recommendation Sheet that was found within a white binder on the medication cart that indicated that a Humalog Kwikpen was good for 28 days at room temperature after opening. During the same interview, LPN FF stated that she would have to double check but believed that all eye ointments were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change oxygen tubing and nebulizer oxygen mask for one resident (#26) and failed to keep a urinary collection bag off the floor for one resident (#6) out of a facility census of 67 residents reviewed for infection control standards resulting in an increased risk of residents acquiring facility acquired infections. Findings included: Resident #26 (R26) Review of the medical record revealed R26 was admitted to the facility 09/11/2020 with diagnoses that include abdominal aortic aneurysm (enlargement of aorta) , disorder of bone, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing),hematuria (blood in urine), anemia (low red blood cells), hypomagnesemia (low magnesium levels in blood), anxiety, type 2 diabetes, epilepsy (disrupted nerve cell activity in brain), neuromuscular dysfunction (dysfunction of muscle), morbid obesity, sever protein-calorie malnutrition, depression, thoracic aortic ectasia (enlargement of aorta), chronic pulmonary edema, chronic respiratory failure, diverticulosis (small pouches in digestive tract), abscess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer COVID-19 Immunization and obtain complete declination for COVID-19 Immunization for one resident (#4) out of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations resulting in the potential for miscommunication and misunderstanding of resident COVID-19 Immunization preferences. Findings Include: Resident #4 (R4) Review of the medical record revealed R4 was originally admitted to the facility [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility [DATE] with diagnoses that include senile degeneration of brain, vertigo (feeling of spinning), arthropathic psoriasis (form of arthritis), encephalopathy (brain disease), sever protein calorie malnutrition, angina pectoris (chest pain), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypotension (low blood pressure), congestive heart failure (CHF), insomnia, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), major depression, anxiety, atrial fibrillation, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-04-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee (QAPI) plan to address allegations of abuse from resident grievances. Findings Included: Review of resident concern/grievance logs revealed since June of 2024 there had been 15 grievances by 15 residents that were not identified as allegations of abuse. Per the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee (QAPI) policy and procedure dated 4/5/2024, revealed under Procedure #6 a list of reports and logs the committee used for improvement priorities and facility-identified concerns. Resident concern summary logs were listed. In an interview on 4/23/2025 at 1:05 PM, Administrator A stated that the QAPI committee met monthly. Administrator A stated that all required members attended all meetings. Administrator A stated that at the time there were no performance improvement plans (PIP) in place, and stated that allegations of abuse had not been identified as a concern with the QAPI committee. Review of the last QAPI meeting dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,852 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $26,852 — penalty dated 2023-11-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97 | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/07/2012 |
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/07/2012 |
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/07/2012 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/24/2025 |
| DIVINEY CHUN, ERIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| HAAS, OLIVIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| RIVERVIEW LAND COMPANY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/07/2012 |
| SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2011 |
| ZENITH FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| LAFLEUR, AMY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/17/2022 |
| NAGY, JEREMY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| PARKER, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| STOBB, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/07/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235658. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.