The Manor of Farmington Hills
21017 Middlebelt Rd, Farmington Hills, MI 48336 · For profit - Corporation · 127 certified beds · (248) 476-8300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent May 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $269,106 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-20)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.5% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.8% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.1% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.0% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.5% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.7% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.6% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.4% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.13 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 213 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.0%CMS range 56.6–68.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 8.0–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 22.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 3.6–9.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 97.1 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00138702 and MI00144605. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the Resident's (R611) right to be free from neglect, including the provision of medical assistance, activities of daily living (ADL) assistance, medication administration and nursing supervision/monitoring for one of three reviewed for neglect, resulting in the resident to have been abandoned at a chemotherapy appointment, waiting approximately five hours for family to pick them up and having to pay for an overnight motel room until the resident was able to go to the hospital for medical care. Findings include: The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 5/17/24, it was identified by the survey team on 5/21/24 and the facility was notified of the IJ on 5/21/24, and a removal plan was requested. On 5/22/24, the State Agency completed onsite verification that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 5/22/24, however the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of potential for more than minimal harm that is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #2649369Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide 1:1 feeding assistance per the resident's assessment and plan of care and thoroughly conduct a Root Cause analysis investigation for one (R701) out of one resident reviewed for accidents/choking, resulting in R701 choking on corned beef and expired shortly thereafter. Findings include:A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) alleged on 10/16/25 during lunch, R701 choked on corned beef while eating in the dining room and died from choking. The complainant reported R701 required 1:1 feeding assistance but believed that nobody was sitting with the resident and/or watching them eat during lunch. The complaint reported that prior to the resident's death they had informed the Administrator that R701 was not receiving 1:1 feeding assistance as needed.A review of R701's clinical record was conducted on 10/29/25 and 10/30/25. The following was revealed:R701 was initially admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2573641Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely assess, treat, notify the physician, and facilitate a transfer to the emergency room after an acute change of condition for one resident (R905), of three residents reviewed for change of condition, resulting in a transfer to the emergency room with a diagnosis of a heart attack requiring surgical intervention. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:45 AM, a phone call was placed to the complainant, and they reported the facility failed to appropriately treat R905 for signs and symptoms of a heart attack. They said R905 requested to go to the hospital when they experienced chest pain, but the facility did not send them in a timely manner. When R905 got to the hospital it was discovered they suffered a massive heart attack requiring surgical intervention. They went on to say R905 was placed in the intensive care unit but was alert and talking to them postoperatively, however; after the surgery R905 suffered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake# MI00152482 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent new wounds from developing, provide wound care and complete/accurately document new skin impairments for two residents (R302 and R303) of three residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in R303's wound care not being completed per Physician's orders and R302's wounds including their right lateral hip, right heel, right toe, right lateral ankle and right lateral foot not being identified and treated in a timely manner. Findings include: On 5/15/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R302's wounds were not appropriately cared for and nobody knew about them. On 5/15/25 the medical record for R302 was reviewed and revealed the following: R302 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 4/30/25 and had diagnoses including Peripheral Vascular Disease, Dementia and Protein-Calories Malnutrition. A review of R302's MDS (minimum data set) with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00146970. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to continuously ensure orders were implemented for supplemental oxygen and for a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine, failed to implement care plans for chronic hypoxic and hypercapnic respiratory failure, failed to implement interventions for supplemental oxygen and the use of a CPAP machine, failed to provide the correct settings for the non-invasive ventilation as ordered by the Pulmonologist, failed to administer antibiotics as prescribed, and failed to provide the necessary CPAP/BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure) ventilation as needed for one R707 of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in multiple incidents of respiratory distress and a change of condition that resulted in a fall, an acute corner fracture of the C5 vertebral body anteriorly and inferiorly, ultimately resulting in the residents death. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: MI00142528 Based on interview and record review facility failed to implement and revise care plan interventions timely for one (R901) of three residents reviewed for care plan, resulting in development of two stage 3 (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss) pressure ulcers, undeteced weight loss, and admission to hospital for surgical debridement of the wound and PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube - a tube directly placed on stomach to provide nutrition and hydration) tube placement. Findings include: R901 R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization for fall at home. R901's admitting diagnoses included: Contusion of scalp, osteoarthritis, metabolic encephalopathy, and history of achondroplasia. R901 was living at home with their spouse prior to this fall and hospitalization. Based on Minimum Data set Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation Pertain to Intake#: MI00142528 Based on record review and interviews facility failed to timely identify and address the nutritional needs; and monitor weights for one (R901) of three high risk residents reviewed for nutrition and weight loss. This deficient practice resulted in, undetected weight loss, further decline in nutritional status, developed two stage three pressure ulcers during their stay at the facility and transferred to hospital for PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube - a tube directly placed on stomach to provide nutrition and hydration) tube placement and surgical debridement of the wound. Findings include: R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization for fall at home. R901's admitting diagnoses included: Contusion of scalp, osteoarthritis, metabolic encephalopathy, and history of achondroplasia. R901 was living at home with their spouse prior to this fall and hospitalization. Based on Minimum Data set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], R901 had Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake(s): MI00141146 This citation has two deficient practice statements (DPS). DPS #1 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and treat a surgical wound according to physicians orders for one (R705) of one resident reviewed for non-pressure wounds, resulting in a hospital transfer when R705's foot was observed to be swollen, warm, with surgical hardware embedded into the skin. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Survey Agency revealed an allegation that the facility neglected to change the resident's surgical bandages as ordered resulting in the resident's foot becoming swollen and the inserted pin shifting and being displaced .resident had to be sent back to the hospital as a result .bandage .was only changed one time in 11 days . Review of R705's clinical record revealed R705 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: displaced fracture of right foot and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00140078, MI00140084, and MI00141881 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to assess newly developed facility acquired pressure ulcers in a timely manner, perform accurate and timely ongoing assessments of wounds and perform treatments per physician's orders for two residents (R#'s R703 and 706) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the worsening of a stage III (full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss) pressure ulcer to a stage IV (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed, often includes undermining and tunneling) pressure ulcer with exposed bone and suspected osteomyelitis (bone infection). Findings include: R703 Review of R703's clinical record revealed R703 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of residents, including R46 and R27, resulting in unmet care needs. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all residents that resided in the facility.On 9/23/25 at 10:16 AM, R46 was observed lying in bed. R46 was asked about care in the facility. R46 explained on 9/22/25 she had asked to be put back into bed around 5:00 PM, before dinner was served. was told they did not have enough staff as she required a mechanical lift and two staff members and had to wait until after dinner. was not assisted back to bed until 9:40 PM. was very tired from sitting in chair that long, and her bottom hurt.On 9/23/25 at 10:26 AM, R27 was observed lying in bed. R27 was asked about care in the facility. R27 explained she was not changed for 12 hours on 9/22/25. was changed around 4:00 PM, then was not changed again until early morning approximately 3:00 or 4:00 AM on 9/23/25. was told they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in foodborne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 9/23/25 at 8:47 AM, during an observation of the main kitchen conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM 'G'), the following concern was observed:The reach in cooler #1 was observed to have a clear, watery liquid coming from the top fan unit (fan was not functioning). CDM 'G' reported the reach in cooler #1 was not functioning properly and someone had been out about a week ago to make repairs and they needed a new gasket part and drip pan. CDM 'G' reported the liquid was coming from the ceiling of the reach in cooler (where the fan was). Directly stored underneath this fan and surround shelving units were several food items that were visibly contaminated with the clear watery substance, including a carboard box soaked with several two pound tubs of pesto sauce, several large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to personal privacy during clinical assessment and provision of care for five (R14, R22, R31, R65, and R104) of five residents reviewed for privacy. Findings include:R14 On 9/23/25 at 10:09 AM, Ancillary Ear Care Nurse Practitioner (NP 'Q') was observed from the hallway providing ear care (wax removal) from the resident. They did not close the door or pull the privacy curtain to ensure personal privacy. Review of the clinical record revealed R14 was admitted into the facility on 5/27/22 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition. R31 & R22 On 9/23/25 at 9:51 AM, R31 was observed from the hallway lying in bed watching their roommate (R22) receive ear care from NP 'Q'. They did not close the door or pull the curtain to ensure personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, homelike environment, for 14 resident rooms (Room #s 101, 103, 106, 107, 110, 116, 118, 121, 237, 243, 244, 246, and 247) and throughout the hallways on Unit 1 and Unit 2. Findings include:On 9/23/25 between 12:45 PM-1:30 PM, observations of Unit 1 and Unit 2 revealed environmental concerns with the wall corners just outside the doorways of resident rooms. There were numerous broken off plastic wall corner edges (that protected the vertical edges of the wall) that had splintered and sharp edges. Most of the broken and/or missing pieces of the plastic were at the ankle level. Additionally, the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a large gap (about two inches) that exposed the sharp metal bracket inside the plastic covering. On 9/24/25 at 8:56 AM, the facility was requested via email to provide documentation which included policies for maintaining equipment including handrails, wall and/or doorway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of mistreatment to the Abuse Coordinator and/or the State Agency within the required time frame for one (R5) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:Review of the clinical record revealed R5 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute respiratory distress syndrome, vascular dementia moderate with psychotic disturbance, delusional disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, and adult failure to thrive.According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R5 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living.Review of the progress notes included:An entry on 9/22/25 at 11:49 AM by the facility's contracted psych Nurse Practitioner (NP 'L') documented, in part: .(R5).is seen today in her room.She wants to go home, stating she does not like the facility and feels that she is being mistreated by certain people,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate diet orders were entered upon admission for one (R101) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding, who was not supposed to eat anything by mouth, resulting in the potential for aspiration when the resident consumed food by mouth. Findings include:On 9/23/25 at 10:20 AM, R101 was observed lying in bed. R101 was able to say some words but had difficulty communicating. R101 reported he understood what others said but was unable to respond appropriately at times. A family member was at R101's bedside at that time. The family member explained R101 recently had a stroke and lost his ability to speak clearly and use one side of his body. On 9/24/25 at 9:00 AM, R101 was observed in bed. R101 reported his stomach hurt. When queried about whether he ate food by mouth, R101 nodded his head. When queried about whether he had a feeding tube, R101 nodded his head. On 9/24/25 at approximately 2:00 PM, R101 was observed in bed visiting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation has two deficient practice statements (DPS).DPS #1Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to assess and treat a skin impairment in a timely manner for one (R99) of three residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: On 9/23/25 at 10:02 AM, R99 was observed lying in bed. When queried about the care provided in the facility, R99 reported he had pain in his left leg. R99 reported he was a victim of multiple gunshot wounds and had surgery to his left leg. R99 pulled the blanket off his leg which revealed an external fixation device that extended from the front of his left lower leg to the front of his left upper leg. R99 reported he was able to turn over a bit in bed but could not move the left leg. On 9/24/25 at 9:02 AM, R99 was observed lying in bed. R99 reported he was given pain medication an hour ago, but he was upset about a wound on the back of his left calf. R99 reported he got the wound while in the hospital due to pressure but the facility was not treating it adequately. R99 pulled back the blanket which revealed his left leg on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely identify and treat a facility acquired pressure ulcer for one (R10) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in R10 acquiring a Stage 4 (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcer. Findings include:On 9/23/25 at 9:11 AM, R10 was observed lying in her bed flat on her back. R10 was asked if she had wounds or sores on her body. R10 explained she thought she did.Review of the clinical record revealed R10 was admitted into the facility on 8/19/22 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hypertensive urgency, fracture of left pubis and stroke. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R10 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS assessment also indicated R10 had one facility acquired Unstageable (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcer.Review of R10's impaired skin care plan revealed interventions that read in part, .Conduct weekly head to toe skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medication in a secure and safe manner and ensure proper disposal of medication for one of three medication carts observed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include:On 9/23/25 at 11:16 AM, a large green pill was observed on the hallway flooring just outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Nurse 'I' was observed several doors down at the medication cart. When asked to come over to room [ROOM NUMBER], Nurse 'I' confirmed the pill on the floor. When asked if they could identify what the pill was, or who it was for, Nurse 'I' used a disposable glove to wrap around the pill and picked it up to inspect and reported there were no markings, and it looked similar to a seizure pill but that was blue. Nurse 'I' then proceeded to discard the pill and disposable glove in the resident's trash can in room [ROOM NUMBER] and returned to their med cart to continue with medication administration.On 9/23/25 at 11:27 AM, an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered x-rays for one (R14) of one resident reviewed for radiology/diagnostic services. Findings include:On 9/23/25 at 10:15 AM, R14 was observed lying in bed with a visitor (Family Member/FM 'BB') seated next to the resident. The resident's left chin/jawline was observed to have dark reddish colored areas.Review of the documentation provided by the facility included:A report dated 9/15/15 12:15 PM documented, .Nursing Description: Resident <sic> noticed resident had discoloration to left side of chin.Writer notified MD (Medical Doctor). Skull xray ordered .Injury Type Bruise Injury Location 4) Face .An entry on 9/18/25 at 4:58 AM by Physician 'DD' read: .09/16/2025 .was seen today as staff reported no <sic> patient had a bruising on her chin laterally on the left side. Will order x-ray.Review of the physician orders included:An x-ray ordered 9/15/25, created 9/16/25 by Nurse 'N' for skull x-ray R/T (related to) swelling and discoloration of chin.Another x-ray ordered 9/15/25, created 9/16/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2573641 and #1249526Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely admission orders and assessments were completed for two residents (R#'s 902 and 905), of three residents reviewed for admissions, resulting in complaints of missed medications. Findings include: R902 On 8/5/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency for reviewed alleged R905 was not provided their medications and was not properly assessed when the day they were admitted to the facility. On 8/5/25 the medical record for R902 was reviewed and reveled the following: R902 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 6/14/25 and had diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes and Congestive heart failure. A review of R902’s census data revealed R902 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 6/14/25. A review of R902’s Hospital After Visit Summary (Discharge Orders) were reviewed and revealed the following medication administration orders: BD Pen Needle Nano…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #1249414Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call system was operational for one resident (R901) of three residents reviewed for call systems. Findings include:On 8/5/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R901's call light (a system used to notify staff of the need for assistance) was not being answered. On 8/5/25 the medical record for R901 was reviewed and reveled the following: R901 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and least readmitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dysphagia, End stage renal disease and Congestive heart failure. A review of R901's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/18/25 revealed R901 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R901's BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) was 15 indicating intact cognition. On 8/5/25 at approximately 11:24 a.m., R901 was observed in their room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00153376 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect Protected Health Information (PHI) for all residents residing on the 300 Hall on May 24, 2025, resulting in the potential for unauthorized disclosure without consent of resident protected health information. Findings include: On 5/28/25, an anonymous complaint was filed with the State Agency alleging residents' health information was not kept private as a staff member identified as Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D had their daughter present on 5/24/25 while preparing medications, administering medications, and taking care of residents. On 6/18/25, a record review of the facility's schedule and room assignment from 5/24/25 was reviewed. Per the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) the 300 Unit is a short stay rehabilitation unit and LPN D was assigned to Cart 5 which assigned them to rooms 301-318. The 300 Unit resident census from 5/24/25 was compared to the 300 Unit census from 6/18/25 and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake# MI00150024 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was turned properly per their needs to prevent accidents and ensure they were fully assessed following the accident for one (R702) of three residents reviewed for falls/accidents. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged the staff was turning R702 and they hit their head against the wall. On 3/4/25 at approximately 10:03 AM, R702 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer questions asked. When asked about the incident that occurred on or about 1/28/25, R702 reported that one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pushed them against the wall when they were changing them and they hit their head. R702 further reported that the CNA pushed again and they hit their head a second time. The resident noted that they did not believe the CNA intended to hurt them, it was just that they should have used a second person to help.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R902 Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility's failure to provide adequate and appropriate care to prevent a pressure wound for R902. A review of the medical record revealed R902 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. On 1/14/25 at 10:55 AM, R902 was observed sitting up in bed eating breakfast. A brief interview was conducted with R902 at that time. At 11:17 AM, an observation of R902's buttocks was conducted with the assistance of Unit Nurse Manager (UNM) A. A pink wound dressing, no date noted was observed on the right side of R902's buttocks. On the left side was an identified open area with maceration. There was no treatment applied to the left buttocks. UNM A confirmed the left side opening and stated treatment should be applied to that area. Shortly after, an observation of the facility's treatment cart was conducted and the wound dressing observed on R902 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00149193. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately obtain and monitor weights for one (R902) of one resident reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: During an interview conducted with the complainant on 1/14/25 at 9:50 AM, the complainant verbalized concerns of weight loss and the facility staff not providing assistance for meals for R902. A review of the medical record revealed R902 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. On 1/14/25 at 10:55 AM, R902 was observed sitting up in bed eating eggs with their fingers. A white towel covered the front of their chest area, with eggs observed all over the towel. R902's tray consisted of ham, eggs, toast and oatmeal. There was no staff observed in the room. When asked if staff offered to help them with their meal, R902 stated they had but they declined their offer. A review of a Weight Summary for R902…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake: MI00149193. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment and monitoring of an Intravenous (IV) catheter and Permacath site, for one (R902) of one resident reviewed for wounds. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 11:17 AM, a partial skin assessment was completed with the assistance of Unit Nurse Manager (UNM) A. Observed on the right side of R902's chest was a split catheter, colored red and the other blue with a dressing dated 12/31/24. On the left side of R902's chest was an IV port covered with a white gauze at the insertion site, no date was noted. A review of the medical chart revealed no documentation, physician orders or care plan that identified the type of each catheter nor the location. Further review of the medical record revealed no orders or care plans implemented for the monitoring and assessment of the catheter sites. A review of the physician orders contained the following order: Change Transparent dressing to PICC every day shift every 7 day(s) for IV maintance <sic>. Ordered 12/17/24. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00147820. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and interdisciplinary collaboration to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one resident (R902) of two reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: A review of a complaint reported to the State Agency on 11/1/24 included an allegation the facility failed to apply the residents hand brace/splint. Record review revealed R902 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of stroke, limitations of activities due to disability, right hand contracture, heart failure, diabetes, and respiratory failure. Psychological history includes depression, schizophrenia, and generalized anxiety disorder. Most recent BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) assessed 11/11/24 was 11/15 indicating R902 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 12/2/24 at 9:40 AM, R902 was observed in their room in a wheelchair with their right hand contracted in a fist resting on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00147667. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician orders were transcribed and implemented for bowel movements for one resident (R903) of of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. Findings include: On 12/2/24 a complaint submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged the facility was not monitoring and treating a change in condition for R903. On 12/2/24 the medical record for R903 was reviewed and revealed the following: R903 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Constipation and Colostomy status. A review of R903's comprehensive plan of care revealed the following: Focus-[R903] is at risk for altered elimination pattern, altered body image, fluid imbalance, skin breakdown and pain: has a colostomy. Date Initiated: 10/28/2019 .Interventions-Observe for diarrhea, constipation, dehydration, pain Q (every) shift and report if indicated. Date Initiated: 04/25/2018 .Ostomy care as ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-21 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI00145991. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) were provided and completed for four (R169, R27, R42, and R62) of four residents reviewed for beneficiary notification, resulting in complaints of not being informed timely of private pay charges for continued services at the facility, and the inability to file an appeal. Findings include: Review of an allegation reported to the State Agency included concerns that the resident and/or representative was not provided with a timely notice for insurance end dates. On 8/19/24 during the entrance conference, the Administrator reported they were currently in transition with their Business Office Manager (BOM) as the former BOM was no longer employed at the facility and had been gone about a week. They were currently having alternating corporate staff fill-in temporarily. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R41 On 8/19/24 at 11:12 AM, the resident was observed laying in bed with supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator. When asked if they had any concerns with lack of sufficient nursing staff, R41 reported concerns with not having enough at times and having to wait long periods of time before staff will respond to their needs. They further reported it seemed like staffing was worse on the weekends. R42 On 8/19/24 at 11:38 AM, the resident was interviewed at bedside. When asked if they felt there was sufficient staffing to meet their needs, R42 reported they need to hire more people all around and couldn't get their pain pill this morning. They further reported at times they waited for help longer than 30 minutes. R77 On 8/19/24 at 12:50 PM, the resident was observed seated on the side of their bed. They reported they had transferred from another nursing facility about five months ago and their top concern since coming to this facility was there were not enough aides on afternoons and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements (DPS). DPS#1 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner for one (R34) of one resident reviewed for dignity, and multiple residents observed during dining. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Federal & State - Resident Rights & Facility Responsibilities dated 5/14/2024: .A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life .A resident is entitle to know who is responsible for and who is providing his or her direct care . R34 On 8/19/24 at 12:15 PM, R34 was observed attempting to self-propel in their wheelchair from their room doorway into the hall. The wheelchair brakes were engaged as R34 grunted and attempted to propel themselves forward. Numerous staff were observed to pass by R34 without assisting them to disengage the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences (including bed length and water in reach) for four (R34, R76, R89, and R170) of eight residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in residents complaining of being uncomfortable, frustrated over loss of independence with grooming or being able to get out of bed, and residents unable to hydrate with or without staff assistance. Findings include: R170 On 8/19/24 at 11:04 AM, R170 was observed lying in bed with no clothing on their upper body and the top blanket covering over their lower extremities. The resident's feet were extended out of the blankets and hung over the end of the bed to the left side of the footboard. The footboard was observed pushed out and down slightly. When asked if they were comfortable as they currently were, they reported No, no I'm not. When asked if the bed was too short, they reported Yes. When asked if anyone else had asked them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to secure resident health information from being displayed in a manner viewable to anyone that passed by the nursing station for five (R119, R120, R121, R122, and R123) of five residents reviewed for privacy. Findings include: On 8/20/24 at 8:24 AM, an observation of the 300 hall nursing station revealed there was a piece of paper taped to the top of the nursing desk facing towards the outside of the desk to the hallway. This paper contained personal resident information which included room numbers, names, current weights and type of scales used to weight R119, R120, R121, R122, and R123. Record reviews included: R119 Review of the clinical record revealed R119 was admitted into the facility on 8/9/24 with diagnoses that included: displaced fracture of olecranon process without intraarticular extension of left ulna, dysphagia, malignant neoplasm of esophagus, and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. R120 Review of the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for use of supplemental oxygen was obtained, including monitoring of the resident's respiratory status and maintaining the humidifier secured to the oxygen concentrator for one (R42) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R42 On 8/19/24 at 11:38 AM, R42 was observed laying in bed. The resident reported they had been at the facility since May 2024 when they transferred from another nursing home that was closing. R42 reported they were receiving supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator with humidified air. The rate of the oxygen flow was set to 4 liters. R42 was asked if they had recently started on oxygen and reported they used their oxygen continuously and had since admission. The container secured to the oxygen concentrator which held water for humidification was empty. R42 was asked who ensured the water was maintained and they reported they had to keep reminding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide ensure consistent dialysis communication documentation and assessments were completed for two residents (R94 and R270), and failed to provide meals prior to hemodialysis appointment for one (R269) of three residents reviewed for dialysis. Findings Include: R94 R94 was long-term resident of the facility. R94 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R94's admitting diagnoses included end stage renal disease, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R94 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 15/15 indicative of intact cognition. Review of R94's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R94 was scheduled for hemodialysis 3 days per week since they were admitted to the facility. Review of R94's care plan dated 4/8/24 that read, For hemodialysis: facility will utilize the dialysis communication form to communicate with the dialysis center. Send the dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label, store, and discard expired medications and biologicals in four of seven medication carts reviewed, resulting in the potential for misuse and decreased efficacy of medications. Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy titled, Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals revised 8/2024 was conducted and read, .3. Facility should ensure that food is not to be stored in the refrigerator, freezer, or general storage areas where medications and biologicals are stored .5. Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors .8. Facility should ensure that test reagents, germicides, disinfectants, and other household substances are stored separately from medications .10. Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals that: (1) have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menu items listed on meal tickets were provided for seven residents (R#'s 12, 101, 64, 34, 89, 59, and 100) of 28 residents reviewed for dining resulting in the potential for disappointment with meals. Findings include: On 8/19/24 at 1:20 PM, an observation of the lunch meal was conducted in the facility dining room and the following was observed: R12's meal ticket revealed they were to be provided a nutritional juice supplement, it was not observed the nutritional juice was provided to them during the meal service, R101's meal ticket revealed they were to be provided a magic cup supplement, no magic cup was observed to be provided to them during the meal service, R64's meal ticket indicated they were to be provided a double dessert and a nutritional juice supplement, the dessert provided was a single serving and no nutritional juice was observed as provided during the meal service. On 8/19/24 at approximately 1:45 PM, an observation of R34's meal ticket on the tray at their bedside revealed they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fresh water and assistance with consuming fluids for four residents (R#'s 59, 34, 89, and 100) of four residents reviewed for hydration, resulting in the potential for dehydration. Findings include: On 8/19/24 at 11:05 AM, R59 was observed in bed, asleep. A foam cup full of water, with no ice and felt room temperature to the touch was observed on the bedside table. It was observed the cup was not dated and the top of the straw was contained in it's paper wrapper. On 8/20/24 at 8:20 AM, R34 was observed in their bed. A foam cup full of water with, 8/20 11-7 (Date/midnight shift time) written on the cup was observed. The cup felt room temperature to the touch and the top of the straw was contained in it's paper wrapper. On 8/20/24 at 10:40 AM, R89, R59, and R100's water cups were observed dated 8/20 with 11-7 written on them. The cups all felt warm to the touch and none contained ice. The top of the straw in R59's cup was observed to be contained in it's paper wrapper. On 8/20/24 at 12:45 PM and 2:00 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner and in accordance with the scheduled mealtimes for the residents (including R39), resulting in late meals and resident dissatisfaction. Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy Meal Times noted: Tray line/Room trays/Dining room: Lunch 12:30 pm. All times are within +/- 10 minutes. On 8/19/24 at 1:05 pm, the first lunch cart left the kitchen to be delivered to the resident rooms. On 8/19/24 at 1:55 pm, the last lunch cart left the kitchen to be delivered to the resident rooms. On 8/19/24 at 2:00 pm, Certified Dietary Manager O was queried about the late lunch meal delivery and stated that they had a call-in for the morning shift, and that it put them behind for the rest of the day. A confidential Resident group meeting was conducted with five residents on 8/20/24 at approximately 11:30 AM. During the meeting, all five residents reported that they were not served meals timely on many occasions. When asked what time they ate their breakfast, Anonymous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize appropriate infection control standards and practices including adherence to implementation of and donning proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) specific to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (R172), proper hand hygiene, and unsafe disposing of human waste (R15), resulting in the potential for spread of infection that could potentially affect all residents in the facility. On 8/21/24 at 7:46 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN X) was observed during medication administration not performing hand hygiene. LPN X donned gloves to administer eye drops, and when the residents telephone fell to the ground, LPN X picked the phone up off the floor, hands remained gloved, placed the phone back to the resident, and attempted to administer eye drops without changing gloves and performing hand hygiene. When prompted, LPN X acknowledged hand hygiene should have been performed and gloves changed. Resident 15 Clinical record review revealed R15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure all corridor areas used by residents were provided with safe and secure hand rails. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who are independently ambulatory with, or without an assistive device. Findings include: Observations conducted during survey between 8/19/24 - 8/20/24 at 3:00 PM revealed concerns regarding the facility's handrails. These concerns included multiple sections of the handrails and hard plastic corner caps/molding were observed to have broken, jagged, missing pieces which exposed the sharp plastic and/or metal underneath throughout the 100 and 200 hallways. Additionally, the handrail near the exit hallway closest to the kitchen was observed pulled away and down from the wall slightly. On On 8/20/24 at 3:06 PM, an interview and observation of the 100 and 200 hallways was done with the Maintenance Director (Staff 'S'). When asked if the conducted any audits of the facility's handrails, Staff 'S' reported they didn't do anything like a monthly audit, but checked once every blue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address grievances for one resident (R31), of one resident reviewed for grievances, resulting in unresolved concerns. Findings include: On 8/19/24 at 10:13 AM, an interview was conducted with R31 in their room and they said, I need some antibiotics. When queried about the need for antibiotics R31 said the facility was not regularly supplying them with new, sterile, intermittent straight urinary catheters. They further explained they had been re-using catheters and believed they developed a urinary tract infection (UTI). They were asked if they made the facility aware of their concerns with a possible UTI and re-using catheters and they said they had. They were then asked if they filled out any type of complaint/grievance form and said they did not. On 8/19/24 at 11:49 AM, a review of a progress note dated 8/14/2024 at 12:50 PM entered into the record by Nurse 'J' read, .While in care conference Resident c/o (complains of pain) pain in groin area and upon urinating also stating having a discharge from his penial <sic> area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00145754 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services consistent with the residents needs and choices. Findings include: A review of a complaint reported to the State Agency included an allegation the facility staff failed to provide adequate and appropriate care based on the patient's needs. Clinical record review revealed R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for hypertension, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and multiple myeloma. R47 underwent debridement of nonviable tissue and a partial calcanectomy (removal of heel bone) of the left foot. A Vacuum assisted closure pump (Wound VAC) was applied to the left foot on 6/7/24 and required infectious disease for antibiotic treatment. R47 is care planned as a decline in ambulation, coordination, and strength related to falls and application of wound healing appliance. R47 required substantial/maximal assistance with one helper, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meal set-up and one-to-one feeding assistance for one resident (R89) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: On 8/19/24 at 11:28 AM, R89 was observed in their bed asleep with a breakfast tray that appeared to be approximately 25% consumed. It was observed with food and beverage spilled on the plate and tray. At that time, R89's roommate said R89 was legally blind. They were asked if staff ever assisted R89 with eating and said staff set the tray up but do not assist them with eating. On 8/19/24 at 1:38 PM, R89 was observed in their bed attempting to consume their lunch meal. R89 was observed to be picking at their meal with their fingers and had food spilled on the tray, on their clothing, and in their bed. R89's roommate and roommate's family said the resident could not see and was legally blind. During the observation, R89 was observed struggling to open with plastic container containing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00145754. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent monitoring and assessment of changes in skin, and implementation of pressure-relieving interventions for two (R47 and R96) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcer management. Findings include: A review of a complaint reported to the State Agency included an allegation the facility staff failed to provide adequate and appropriate care to prevent and/or treat pressure sores. R47 Clinical record review revealed R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for hypertension, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and multiple myeloma. R47 underwent debridement of nonviable tissue and a partial calcanectomy (removal of heel bone) of the left foot. A Vacuum assisted closure pump (Wound VAC) was applied to the left foot on 6/7/24 and required infectious disease for antibiotic treatment. R47 is care planned as a decline in ambulation, coordination, and strength.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessment, monitoring, and provision of supplies for two residents (R#'s 31 and 15) who used urinary catheters, of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in the potential for the development of urinary tract infections. Findings include: R31 On 8/19/24 at 10:13 AM, an interview was conducted with R31 in their room and they said, I need some antibiotics. When queried about the need for antibiotics R31 said the facility was not regularly supplying them with new, sterile, intermittent straight urinary catheters. They further explained they had been re-using catheters and believed they developed a urinary tract infection (UTI). At that time, no catheter kits were observed in the resident's room. On 8/19/24 at 11:49 AM, a review of a progress note dated 8/14/2024 at 12:50 PM entered into the record by Nurse 'J' read, .While in care conference Resident c/o (complains of pain) pain in groin area and upon urinating also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed consistently monitor weights for one (R29) of two residents reviewed for nutrition resulting in the potential for undetected weight loss, and overall decline in functional status. Findings include: R29 was a long-term resident of the facility. R29 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R29 most recently was hospitalized and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R29's admitting diagnoses included seizures, hemiplegia (stroke), diabetes, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and chronic pain. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. R29 needed extensive staff with their mobility in bed and their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) such as transfers, dressing, toileting, etc. An initial observation was completed on 8/19/24 at approximately 10:30 AM. This surveyor observed staff delivering the breakfast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to order laboratory tests timely for one resident (R31) who experienced signs and symptoms of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and obtain physician ordered routine labs for one (R87) of two residents reviewed for laboratory service. Findings include: R87 Review of the clinical record revealed R87 was a long-term resident of the facility. R87 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R87's admitting diagnoses included osteoarthritis, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and heart failure. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R87 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. R87 needed extensive staff assistance with their mobility in bed, transfers, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) such as grooming, dressing, toileting etc. Review of R87's clinical record revealed a physician order for Depakote oral tablet delayed release 125 mg (milligrams) two times a day. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain and/or coordinate radiology services for an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) for one (R42) of one resident reviewed for radiology/other diagnostic services, resulting in verbalized concerns of the delay in obtaining the MRI, and the potential for delayed identification of any abnormalities which may require additional medical/treatment intervention. Findings include: On 8/19/24 at 11:38 AM, an interview was conducted with R42. When asked if they had any concerns, R42 reported they had pain all over, especially their left thigh and arm. They reported concerns with the lack of scheduling and coordination of an MRI and stated their cancer doctor wanted them to have an MRI done for their left thigh. The resident reported they gave that information to the facility to coordinate, but no one has contacted them about if/when that was scheduled. R42 was worried about their cancer diagnosis and also expressed concern that another part of their thigh is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00145663. Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided to ensure adequate care was provided for two (R's 303 & 304) of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Staffing. This deficient practice had the ability to affect multiple residents that resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) included the following concerns: the facility is short staffed on all shifts, residents are being left wet/soiled for extended periods of time and residents are not being showered. On 7/24/24 at 10:34 AM, R303 was observed sitting on their bed watching television. When asked about the facility's staffing R303 stated they don't get their showers regularly because they don't have enough staff. R303 pointed out their facial hair and stated they preferred not to have any facial hair, however the aides never have time to shave them because they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six staff members reviewed for criminal background checks were screened for eligibility to work in a nursing home, resulting in the potential for abuse or neglect to occur. This has the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: On 5/22/24 at 8:30AM the facility was asked to provide the personnel file, all educations, trainings. Disciplines and background checks for six employees. On5/22/24 at 10:10AM a follow up request was initiated for employee's information. On 5/22/24 at 12:32PM The facility provided the files with completed background checks, educations and trainings for all employees except for two. The facility provided a personnel file for Nurse H, this file was not requested, however was reviewed due to identification of a missing background check clearance. A third request for Nurse B's file was made to the Administration staff. Nurse H's file was reviewed and it was missing educations, training, a background check with finger print results. On 5/22/24 at 2:00PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's guardian of changes of condition for one (R702) of two residents reviewed for notification of changes. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) on 3/14/24 that alleged in part, .no one called to tell me that (R702) had pulled his feeding tube out . found out when I was visiting him and happened to touch his stomach . (R702) had also been put on an IV (intravenous fluids) and I only found out because my friend was coming to visit him . Review of the closed record revealed R702 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: diabetes, depression and stroke. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R702 had severely impaired cognition and required the assistance of staff for activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of R702's January 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed four Enteral Feed Orders (feeding through a tube into the gastrointestinal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00143505 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and address resident grievances for one resident (R705) of one residents reviewed for grievance resolution, resulting in verbalized complaints and frustration. Findings include: On 4/2/24 a complaint submitted to the Stage Agency was reviewed which indicated R705 had been left wet and soiled and nobody from facility administration had followed up with R705's family pertaining to the verbalized concerns. On 4/2/24 at approximately 12:27 p.m., during a conversation with family member J (FM J), FM J reported that they had concerns about the care in the facility for R705 pertaining to being left wet and soiled for five hours of time and not being placed back into bed and being left in their wheelchair for hours. FM J reported that that they had discussed their concerns with Social Work Director K (SWD K) and that SWD K was going to let the Director of Nursing (DON) know about the concerns so that they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00142508 and Intake #MI00142954 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete assessments for one resident (R703) of three reviewed for change in condition resulting in R703 developing intense pain from a blood clot requiring hospitalization. Findings include: A Clinical record review revealed R703 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation from back surgery performed on 1/5/24. Medical history includes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, diabetes, chronic pain, morbid obesity, and overactive bladder. Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score total is 15/15 indicating R703 was cognitively intact. On 4/2/24 at 9:38 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with R703 and they reported on 01/17/24 around 1:00-2:00 AM they woke up with severe intense pain, swelling, and warm sensation in the left leg. The call light was pressed, and nobody came in. R703 placed their self into the wheelchair and saw a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake#: MI00142528 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely completion and submission of a comprehensive assessment after significant change in status for one resident (R901) of one reviewed for resident assessments, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization for a fall at home. R901's admitting diagnoses included: Contusion of scalp, osteoarthritis, metabolic encephalopathy, and history of achondroplasia. R901 was transferred to hospital on 1/26/23 for further weight loss and PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube - a tube directly placed on stomach to provide nutrition and hydration) tube placement and worsening wounds. Review of R901's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/18/23. Section K (nutrition and swallowing section) of the MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to assist with repositioning/off-loading to relieve prolonged pressure for two (R906 and R907) of two Residents, with multiple pressure ulcers, who were dependent upon staff for turning/repositioning, during multiple observations. This deficient practice has the potential to result in worsening of pressure ulcers with decline in overall health condition and hospitalization. R906 R906 is a long-term resident of the facility. R906 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had recent hospitalization and they were readmitted back to the facility on 1/9/24. R906's admitting diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, decubitus ulcers (pressure sores), and paraplegia (paralysis of both legs). Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R906 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. R906 needed extensive (2 -person) assistance to assist with their mobility in bed, turning and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation Pertain to Intake#: MI00142528 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) implement appropriate action to correct quality deficiencies; and 2) sustain a system to ensure corrective measures related to prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries for two (R906 and R907) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: The facility's QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) failed to identify quality issues as evidenced by facility's failure to effectively implement and consistently monitor preventative measures for pressure ulcer prevention for R906 and R907. R906 and R907 needed extensive staff assistance with their repositioning/off-loading in bed. Staff failed to assist with repositioning/off-loading to relieve prolonged pressure on the area with wounds for R906, during seven different observations completed during this survey. R906 had multiple pressure ulcers that included a facility acquired a stage 4 pressure ulcer. Staff also failed to assist with repositioning/offloading R907 during five different observations. R907 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00139090 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (R701) right to be free from physical abuse by Certified Nurse Aide 'C'. On 1/17/24 at 11:00 AM, a review of a facility reported incident investigation file provided by the facility was conducted. The file contained a typed document that summarized the incident and read, .On 6.21.23 the administrator was made aware of an incident involving (R701) and staff member (CNA, Certified Nurse Aide 'C'). The staff member allegedly struck (R701) in the face .The administrator interviewed the assigned staff member (CNA 'C') regarding this alleged allegation .When asked if she hand <sic> touched the resident in her face, or near her face in anyway <sic>? She replied 'no'. She continued I take care of my residents .The administrator interviewed (Nursing student 'D') a nursing student who is in her clinical rotation, was training with the assigned staff member (CNA 'C'). (Nursing Student 'D') reported, that (R701) .motion as if she was going to hit and spit on her (CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00141886 and MI00141946 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls in a timely manner for one (R707) of one resident reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of R707's clinical record revealed R707 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: encephalopathy and dementia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R707 had severely impaired cognition and required partial/moderate assistance for transfers and to walk 10 feet. The MDS revealed R707 had a history of falls prior to admission and had two or more falls since he was admitted into the facility. Review of R707's progress notes revealed he fell on [DATE] and 12/9/23. On 1/17/24 at 12:21 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'G' via the telephone. When queried about R707 and the fall documented on 12/9/23, LPN 'G' stated, He fell many times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by: 1. Failing to label and date food in the walk in cooler and freezer and failing to discard expired food items timely and 2. Failing to discard kitchen refuse in appropriate trash/refuse receptacles. These deficient practices have the potential to result in food borne illness among any or all the 98 residents of the facility. Findings include: An initial kitchen tour was completed with the staff member I on 5/21/23, at approximately, 8:45 AM. Dietary management team was not present at the facility and initial kitchen observation was completed in the presence of Staff member I. The following observations were made during the initial kitchen rounds: 1. Observed a carton of opened milk in the refrigerator in which dairy products were stored. Observed two containers, one with blueberry jelly and the other one with strawberry jelly that expired on 5/19/23 in a different refrigerator. 2. Observed a tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control measures were in place to 1) ensure proper disposal of soiled Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) for two (R239 and R241) and 2) proper hand hygiene was performed after removal of soiled PPE for residents (R241) who were observed for transmission-based precautions. These deficient practices have the potential for spread of infections to all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R241 R241 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short-term rehabilitation and skilled nursing services. R241's admitting diagnoses from the hospital included cellulitis of left leg, hepatitis-C. R241 tested positive for COVID-19 on 5/22/23 during their stay at the facility. An observation was completed on 5/23/23 at approximately 8:45 AM, R241's room had signages outside the room indicating that they were on transmission-based precautions. A PPE cart was observed outside the door in the hallway. An open trash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete a self-administration of medication assessment for one (R241) of one resident reviewed for the self-administration of medications. Findings include: On 5/21/22 at 10:17 AM, R241 was observed in their wheelchair in their room. A tube of triamcinolone acetonide was observed on the bedside table next to R241's bed. When asked, R241 stated they are supposed to have it applied to their left leg, however the staff have not consistently applied it. On 5/22/23 at 11:57 AM, R241 was not observed in their room, however the tube of triamcinolone acetonide was still observed on the resident bedside table. Review of the medical record revealed R241 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included cellulitis of the left lower limb. Review of the physician orders documented in part . Triamcinolone Acetonide External Ointment 0.1%, Apply to LLE (Lower Left Extremity) topically every shift for cellulitis . Review of the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure choices was provided for two (R's 240 & 37) of three residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: On 5/21/23 at 9:41 AM, R240 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in their room, an interview was conducted with the resident at that time. During the interview, R240 picked up a meal ticket from their breakfast tray and stated . Look, they have me down as eats in room, they didn't ask me! It just says eat in room . I'm sociable. I would love to eat in the dining room . Review of the medical record revealed R240 was admitted into the facility on 5/12/23 with diagnoses that included depression. Review of a Diet History/Food Preferences dated 5/18/23, documented Breakfast, Lunch & Dinner, and the Location of the resident preferences. This section was left blank for all three meals. On 5/22/23 at 3:59 PM, Dietician B was interviewed and asked who assesses the resident preference for dining options as it pertains to eating in their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable home like environment for one of one resident (R3) resulting in the potential for resident dissatisfaction with their living conditions. Findings include: A record review revealed R3 was a long-term resident of the facility. An initial observation was completed on 5/21/23 at approximately 1:35 PM. R3 was observed in their room, lying on their bed. R3 reported that they needed help in getting back to their home. The Nurse assigned to care for R3 was notified. During this observation two large holes measuring approximately over five inches were observed behind R3's bed on the dry wall. The holes were visible from the sides of the R3's bed. A second observation was completed approximately two hours later that day. On 5/22/23 three observations were completed at approximately 8:30 AM, 1:00 PM, and 3:30 PM. R3 was observed in their room, in their bed. Two large holes on the wall were visible from the sides and were not fixed. On 5/23/23, at approximately 7:30 AM, the facility Administrator was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure regular care planning review conferences were held with the legally authorized resident representative for one resident (R64) of one residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care plans. Findings include: On 5/21/23 at approximately 11:42 a.m., R64 was observed in their room up in their wheelchair with R64's legal guardian at the bedside who indicated they have not had a care conference (a meeting with the interdisciplinary team to review the comprehensive plan of care) in a long time. On 5/22/23 the medical record for R64 was reviewed and revealed the following: R64 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia, Muscle weakness and Muscle wasting. A review of R64's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/14/23 revealed R64 needed extensive assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R64's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was four, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and appropriate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) grooming, feeding assistance and showers for two (R36 and R54) of three Residents reviewed for ADL care resulting in the potential for negative physical, psychosocial outcomes, and potential loss of dignity for residents who are dependent on staff for assistance. Findings include: R36 R36 was a long-term resident of admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R36's diagnoses included Dementia and difficulty with walking. R36 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicative of moderate cognitive deficits. R36 needed staff assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. On 5/21/23 at approximately 2:35 PM or 36 was observed in bed. R36 disheveled, had dry and flaky skin on their face and arms, facial hair not shaved, with long hair, not groomed. R36 was wearing a pajama pant and a white T-shirt with stains on it. Multiple observations were made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure wound care was completed per Physician's orders for one resident (R56) of three residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: On 5/21/23 at approximately 11:55 a.m., R56 was observed in their room up in bed. R56 was observed with dressings on their bilateral feet. The dressings on the left and right feet were dated 5/18/23. R56 was queried how often the Nursing staff are completing their wound dressings and they reported staff were supposed to do new dressings every other day, but have not. R56 indicated they have not had their dressings changed since they moved to their new room. On 5/21/23 the medical record for R56 was reviewed and revealed the following: R56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Urinary tract infection, Adult failure to thrive and Morbid obesity. A review of R56's MDS (Minimum Data Set) an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/3/23 revealed R56 needed extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate catheter care, monitoring and documentation was completed for three residents (R56, R80 and R190) of three residents who were reviewed for catheter care/Urinary tract infections. Findings include: Resident #56 On 5/21/23 at approximately 11:55 a.m., R56 observed in their room up in their bed. R56 was queried if they had any concerns regarding their care in the facility and they reported they were having a problem with their catheter and they were having urinary burning. On 5/21/23 the medical record for R56 was reviewed and revealed the following: R56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Urinary tract infection, Adult Failure to thrive and Morbid obesity. A review of R56's MDS (Minimum Data Set) an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/3/23 revealed R56 needed extensive assistance with most of their activities of daily living. R56's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of weights for one resident with weight loss (R64) of six residents reviewed for Nutrition. Findings include: On 5/21/23 at approximately 11:42 a.m., R64 was observed in their room up in their wheelchair with R64's legal guardian at the bedside who indicated that R64 was not eating and had experienced weight loss. On 5/22/23 the medical record for R64 was reviewed and revealed the following: R64 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia, Muscle weakness and Muscle wasting. A review of R64's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/14/23 revealed R64 needed extensive assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R64's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was four, indicating severely impaired cognition. Section K indicated that R64 had weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% more in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding (nutrition delivered from a surgically placed tube in the stomach) was provided according to physicians orders for one (R80) of three residents reviewed for enteral feeding and one (R15) additional resident. Findings include: R80 On 5/21/23 at 9:30 AM, R80 was observed in bed. When asked how they were doing, R80 stated, I need water. There were no cups observed at R80's bedside. When R80 opened their mouth, a tan substance was pooled at the front of their mouth. R80 was receiving nutrition via a PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - a tube surgically inserted into the stomach used to deliver nutrition). A bottle of Glucerna 1.5 was hung on the tube feeding pole and it was infusing at 65 milliliters per hour (ml/hr) according to the tube feeding pump. The label on the Glucerna bottle indicated the tube feeding was started at 6:00 PM on 5/20/23 and the rate was documented as 75 ml/hr. At that time, 809 ml had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff to provide care and services to the residents. This had the ability to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 5/21/23 at 8:44 AM, during a tour of the facility, Nurse 'Y' was asked about staffing in the facility. Nurse 'Y' reported the facility had an ongoing problem with adequately staffing the night shift. Nurse 'Y' stated, If you look at the schedule for last night they had four aides for the whole building and we usually have eight aides. Nurse 'Y' further reported that due to inadequate staffing it was difficult to provide quality care. On 5/22/23 at approximately 11:05 AM, during the group interview, the group was queried if they had any concerns regarding staffing in the facility. A resident who preferred to remain anonymous reported there were not enough Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) during the midnight shift and on the weekends and the aides that do show up to work were overworked. The anonymous resident indicated that during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure expired medications, Pneumococcal vaccines and a TB solution was removed from the facility's medication rooms and discarded for two of three medications storage rooms reviewed and failed to ensure a treatment cart was secured/locked of three carts reviewed. Findings include: On 5/21/23 at 8:41 AM, the treatment cart located on Unit 1 was observed to be unlocked. The cart contained various topical medications used to treat wounds. At approximately 8:45 AM, Nurse 'F' exited a resident's room. When queried about the treatment cart being unlocked, Nurse 'F' reported it should have been locked. On 5/23/23 at 8:33 AM, an observation of the medication storage room on Unit 1 was completed with the Assistant Director Of Nursing (ADON) A. Upon review of the medication storage room four bottles of the slow-release iron 21 century slow-release mineral supplement was identified to have expired in April of 2023, however still remained in the facility medication supply. Further observation of the medication storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation in the residents' medical records for one (R56) resident. Findings include: On 5/21/23 at approximately 11:55 a.m., R56 was observed in their room up in bed. R56 was observed with dressings on their bilateral feet. The dressings on the left and right feet were dated 5/18/23. R56 was queried how often the Nursing staff are completing their wound dressings and they reported staff were supposed to do new dressings every other day, but have not. R56 indicated they have not had their dressings changed since they moved to their new room. On 5/21/23 the medical record for R56 was reviewed and revealed the following: R56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Urinary tract infection, Adult failure to thrive and Morbid obesity. A review of R56's MDS (Minimum Data Set) an ARD (Assessment Reference Date of 5/3/23 revealed R56 needed extensive assistance with most of their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$269,106 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $122,795 — penalty dated 2025-11-20
- $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-08-06
- $36,988 — penalty dated 2025-05-16
- $39,585 — penalty dated 2024-10-01
- $43,053 — penalty dated 2024-05-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2008 |
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2008 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2008 |
| DILLARD, CARLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/05/2017 |
| SCHWARTZENFELD, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235508. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.