No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Regency at Troy

2685 West Maple Road, Troy, MI 48084 · For profit - Individual · 154 certified beds · (248) 965-7900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (248) 965-7900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)4 actual-harm citations1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1777 Axtell Dr Ste 100 · (248) 629-0692 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2924 W Maple Rd · (248) 850-1376 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2670 W Maple Rd · (248) 643-6770 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1525 Equity Dr · (248) 320-5943 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-05 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.4%10.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.9%12.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.7%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.9%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.9%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.2%79.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.4%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.0%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.561.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.791.641.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 247 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
1.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
56.3%
Total nursing turnover
47.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 135.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-27)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2963192. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent a fall for one Resident (R121) and failed to assess and provide interventions to prevent choking for one Resident (R79) out of seven residents reviewed for falls/accidents, resulting in R121 sustaining a fracture to the right femur, pain and extended hospital stay. Findings include: R121 A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R121 fell out of bed and broke their hip. A review of R121's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: fracture of right femur, chronic kidney disease and type II diabetes. A review of R121's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 (moderate cognitive impairment). Continued review of R121's clinical record revealed the following: 3/30/26: Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake(s): 2795651, 2796703, 2786658, 2725790, 2634630 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for pressure ulcers was timely assessed and timely treated for pressure ulcers for one (R706) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/wound care resulting in R706 obtaining a facility acquired stage 4 pressure ulcer that required hospitalization and surgery and pain. Findings include:A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged the resident went to (name redacted) hospital on 2/17/26 with a right buttock wound and it could not be determined when the woundstarted. Hospital records from 2/17/26 to 2/24/26 were reviewed and revealed, in part, the following: .chief complaint: WOUND CHECK.Patient is alert and oriented x3.She presented via EMS (emergency medical services) from (facility) for evaluation of sacral wound.Patient reports an open wound on her right buttock which has worsened over the past week. Patient is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2709710.Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to implement adequate/effective fall interventions and ensure consistent follow up of fall interventions implemented, for one (R201) of one resident reviewed for falls. This resulted in a transfer to the hospital and the identification of a left ischium fracture. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part . (R201's name) had multiple falls at (facility name). suffered a . left leg fracture. on 1/3, a nurse. and her. nurse manager at (facility name) refused to call 911.A review of the hospital referral provided to the facility upon R201's admission documented the following in part, . Hospital Problem List - Open fracture of nasal one, initial encounter. Nasal septum fracture. Nasal laceration. Fracture of fingers, left. Fall. Syncope and collapse.A History & Physical dated 12/9/25 at 10:38 AM, documented in part . presents to the Emergency Center for a fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00152492 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, and document, catheter care for three residents (902, 904, 905) of three reviewed for catheter use. Additionally, the facility failed to document Urology Consultations, and evaluate the long term administration for Pyridium (analgesic medication used to relieve urinary tract discomfort, including pain, burning, and urgency) resulting in the delay of diagnosing and treatment of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Sepsis (an infection causing injury to its own organs) and hospitalization and subsequently death. Findings include: R902 A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R902 complained of pain in the bladder area on [DATE] and the facility did not attend to the concern until [DATE]. The complainant further alleged they requested R902 be sent to the hospital and the facility failed to do so until several hours after R902 voiced their concerns of pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an ongoing Infection Control Program, ensure consistent and accurate surveillance of the facility's infections and failed to consistently implement the facility's Infection Prevention Program policy, this had the ability to affect all residents' that resided in the facility, including R31.Findings include:A review of the facility's Infection Surveillance Program (December 2025 to May 2026) revealed the following:December 2025, January 2026, February 2026, March 2026, April 2026, and May 2026 - documented multiple Infection(s) as unknown with no signs/symptoms documented, however noted multiple antibiotics and other treatments administered to the residents.Infection Surveillance from December 2025 to May 2026 also noted multiple residents with signs/symptoms of chills, cough, shortness of breath, congestion, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea - that were not tested for COVID-19 as recommended by CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Symptoms of COVID-19 | COVID-19 | CDC.A review of the CDC Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure ongoing oversight of the appropriateness of antibiotics and failed to ensure the criteria for infections were met, this had the ability to affect multiple residents that resided in the facility that was prescribed antibiotics.Findings include:A review of the facility's Infection Surveillance Program (December 2025 to May 2026) revealed the following:Multiple infections documented as unknown.Multiple infections noted without supporting documentation of the criteria of an infection to have been met.Multiple prescribed antibiotics for residents with no signs/symptoms documented.The Surveillance Program did not contain documentation to support the appropriateness of multiple antibiotics prescribed.On 6/10/26 at 10:59 AM, an interview was held with the Infection Preventionist (IP) G. IP G was asked how they determine if an infection met criteria for treatment and IP G stated the facility utilizes the McGeer's criteria. IP G was asked to provide documentation of the facility's infections to have met criteria and IP G…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2987034.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interdisciplinary care plan reviews were completed with the resident and/or legal representative, included the required interdisciplinary team (IDT) members, and were done in accordance with each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two (R43 and R120) of three residents reviewed for care plan review, resulting in the lack of opportunity for the resident and/or legal representative to participate in discussion of treatment options and decisions which pertain to all aspects of their plan of care. Findings include:Review of a complaint to the State Agency on 4/17/26 included concerns with care planning conferences and alleged there was no nursing involvement and only the physical therapist, dietician and the social worker came to the meeting. R43Review of the clinical record revealed R43 was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE], discharged on 4/12/26 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 3030553 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop, implement, and monitor an effective restorative nursing program for two (R26 & R27) of three residents identified as having the potential to maintain or improve their functional abilities. The facility did not consistently assess residents for restorative nursing needs, establish individualized restorative goals, or ensure restorative interventions were provided as planned. Findings include: R26 On 6/08/26 at 1:30 p.m., R26 was observed in their hospital bed in their room, laying on their back, wearing a gown. Their heels were positioned directly on the mattress. R26's family member, FM AA, was present in their room with them. There was a tall bariatric recline wheelchair in their room with a wheelchair cushion in newer condition. It was noted R26's left hand was curled into a fist. R26's left leg was extended and rotated, with minimal edema, more pronounced on the dorsum of their left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #3014976Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary physician ordered medication upon admission for one (R129) out of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R129 was not receiving needed treatment and medication and the failure to receive them resulted in sepsis and death.A review of R129's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: left hip fracture requiring operative repair , scoliosis and chronic back pain.Continued review of R129's clinical record noted the following:4/2/26: Hospital Discharge Order Sheet: History: .patient (R129) underwent hemiarthroplasty of the left hip on December 1, 2025 followed by multiple dislocations.A subsequent occurred on February 10, 2026.Persistent drainage from the surgical site has been ongoing for approximately three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake 2702800, 2746398, 2800213, 2651998, 2646662, 2634630, 2795651, 2796703, 2649843, 2785783, and 2749201. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate provision of activities of daily living care including incontinence care for four Residents (R703, R708, R709, and R715) of ten residents reviewed for activities of daily living and incontinence care. Findings include: Review of several complaints received by the State Agency revealed allegations of residents waiting extended times for their call lights to be answered, resulting in residents laying in urine-soaked briefs, hygiene concerns, and staffing and care concerns. Three of the complaints were reviewed as follows: Received on 3/04/26. Alleged R703 was regularly left soaked in urine for 12 hours at a time, several times during their three week stay. Alleged resident was only given three showers in a week and had poor hygiene care including grooming. Received on 2/13/26: Alleged the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2634630.Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to report an allegation of mistreatment to the State Agency (SA) and failed to follow the facility policy for one (R716) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the SA documented in part . the staff is being aggressive and rough with (R716 name) resulting in her feeling injured afterwards.A review of the medical record revealed R716 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute respiratory failure, macular degeneration and conductive hearing loss. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], that documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 (moderately impaired cognition). R716 required staff assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).A review of a grievance dated 9/24/25, completed by Social Services Technician (SST) D documented in part . Son (son name) informed me that he would like his mother…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: 2795651 & 2796703. Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure acceptable standards of Nursing care and services was provided for one (R704) of two residents reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include: A complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) noted the following in part: On 2/22/26 the family member of (R704) received a call that R704's oxygen had dropped under 90%. The family member raced to the nursing home to find R704 hallucinating with the oxygen tank empty and nasal cannula on the floor. They informed R704's nurse of the 02 (oxygen) tank being empty and the oxygen tubing to be observed on the floor and the nurse instructed the family member to put the oxygen tubing back into R704's nose. The family member asked the nurse if the resident was tested for a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) and the nurse replied, We don't do those on Sunday. The family member noted the nurse did not come in to assess the resident, so the family member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #2785783 and 2634630. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely assistance with feeding for two residents who required feeding assistance (R702 and R718) out of four residents reviewed for food concerns. Findings include:Complaints were filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged concerns with staffing and that residents that required assistance with eating were not receiving timely assistance with meals due to staffing issues and not always receiving food as ordered. On 3/17/26 at approximately 12:30 PM, an attempt to observe lunch service for residents eating in their rooms on the second-floor north hall (Willow Lane) was conducted. At 12:30 PM, no trays had been delivered to that area. A resident was observed sitting on a couch eating what appeared to be food not provided by the facility. Sitting near the resident was R718. R718 kept eyeing the other residents' food. An attempt to interview R718 was made. R718 appeared confused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #2634630 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure wound care was administered both timely and correctly for one (R719) of five residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include:On 3/18/26 at approximately 11:30 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J reported that R719 had some concerns to discuss pertaining to their wound care. R719 was then observed sitting in their wheelchair. A family member was also in the room. R719 reported that on 3/17/26 at approximately 11:30 PM, they asked Nurse M if they were going to change their wound dressing as they had not had it changed since 7 AM that morning and to their understanding they had an order to change their wound two times per day (morning and bedtime). R719 reported that after they asked to have their wound dressing changed, Nurse M told them that they were not going to provide wound care because they were too busy as they had been assigned 29 residents. R719 stated on 3/18/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This complaint pertains to Intake #2702800. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) received timely urine samples causing a delay in treatment and extended pain for one (R702) out of three residents reviewed for UTI's. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged it took over four days to obtain a urine specimen to determine treatment for a UTI. The complainant further alleged that staff blamed the delay on the resident not drinking enough water and noted that R702 could only drink water with staff assistance, and they felt there was either a lack of staff or staff did not respond timely to residents call light. On 3/17/26 at approximately 10:20 AM, R702 was observed lying in bed. Both the right and left hand were contracted. There was food items located near the window and several cups of water that were out of reach of the resident. The resident was alert and able to answer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: 2795651 & 2796703.Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy and maintenance was administered as ordered by the Clinician for one (R704) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:A complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) noted the following in part: On 2/22/26 the family member of (R704) received a call that R704's oxygen had dropped under 90%. The family member raced to the nursing home to find R704 hallucinating with the oxygen tank empty and nasal cannula on the floor. They informed R704's nurse of the 02 (oxygen) tank being empty and the oxygen tubing to be observed on the floor and the nurse instructed the family member to put the oxygen tubing back into R704's nose. The family member noted the nurse did not come in to assess the resident, so the family member called 911. EMS (Emergency Medical Services) arrived and assessed the resident 02 at 86% and transferred the resident to the hospital.A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2709710.Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were consistently utilized before the administration of pharmacological interventions, failed to ensure appropriate indication for psychotropic medications, failed to revise and individualized the behavioral health care plan, and ensure behavioral health service monitoring for one (R201) of one resident reviewed for falls. Findings include:A review of the hospital referral provided to the facility upon R201's admission documented the following in part, . Hospital Problem List - Open fracture of nasal one, initial encounter. Nasal septum fracture. Nasal laceration. Fracture of fingers, left. Fall. Syncope and collapse.A review of the medical record revealed R201 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included: dementia, alzheimer's disease, falls, major depressive disorder, glaucoma, and fracture of the nasal bones. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2605657. Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure an appropriate admission, staff competency and ensure coordinated care was implemented prior to the admission of one (R708) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part . Admitting a resident with a fresh laryngectomy that the facility did not have the competence to care for, resulting in the facility having to rush the resident into a transfer the next morning.Review of the medical record revealed R708 was admitted on [DATE] and transferred out of the facility on 4/10/25. A review of the preadmission transferring hospital documents provided to the facility before and upon R708's admission identified the following:An otolaryngology progress note dated 4/3/25, documented in part . s/p (status post) total laryngectomy (surgical removal of larynx), bilateral neck dissection, left oropharyngectomy (surgical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2605657. Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure bladder incontinence care was completed timely for one (R702) of three residents reviewed for a urinary tract infection. Findings include:On 9/24/25 at 9:59 AM, R702 was observed sitting up in bed. When asked, R702 explained how they have been in and out of the hospital due to infections. R702 explained how they are .always wet and sitting in wet diapers for hours. This is why I always get infections. R702 stated they had not seen or met their Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) for the day and the last time their brief was changed was by the night shift CNA at 6 AM. R702 stated they were wet and had been laying in their wet brief for some time. At 10:24 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA A. When asked CNA A confirmed they were assigned to R702 for their shift. CNA A was asked what time they began their shift and CNA A replied at 7 AM. CNA A was asked how many residents they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2605657Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately in one medication cart of one medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include:On 9/25/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged facility staff were not storing medications properly. On 9/25/25 at approximately 11:22 a.m., a medication cart that was located on the second floor next to room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed unlocked and unattended by any Nursing staff. The medication cart top drawer was observed to contain multiple unidentified pills stored in an uncovered and unlabeled plastic cup as well as a second uncovered plastic cup full of a white powdery substance. No resident name was attached to the pills or powder that identified what the pills/powder were or what resident they belonged to. On 9/25/25 at approximately 11:25 a.m., Nurse Manager B (NM B) was observed coming out of a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s 2605657 and 2623220. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a substantial evening meal was provided for one resident (R709) of three residents reviewed for meals/food. Findings include:On 9/25/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged residents were not receiving meals. On 9/25/25 at approximately 9:47 a.m., R709 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R709 was observed to have contracted hands, turned into their palms. R709 was queried if they had any concerns regarding their care and they reported they were not provided with a dinner meal the previous day (9/24) and that the only food they got after lunch was a yogurt and chocolate pudding that the night Nurse gave them due to the kitchen being closed. R709 reported the facility never provided them with a supper meal tray at dinner and they did not get the yogurt until around 8:30 or 9:00 PM. R709 reported that their night Nurse (Nurse C) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2605657. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed for one resident (R709) of three residents reviewed for infection control. Findings include:On 9/25/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged the facility was not following infection control policies/procedures. On 9/25/25 at approximately 9:47 a.m., R709 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R709 was observed to have contracted hands, turned into their palms. R709 was queried if they had any concerns regarding their care and they reported they were concerned about the facility having a COVID-19 outbreak. R709 was queried if staff had been observed wearing masks and gowns in their room and they reported that some do and some do not. On 9/25/25 at approximately 11:13 a.m., and 12:05 p.m., R709's door was observed to not contain any signage indicating staff were to use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This complaint pertains to complaint 2587774Based on interview and record review facility failed to ensure timely admission orders were implemented for one (R901) of two residents reviewed for admission orders resulting in the potential for residents to not receive timely care/services with potential for decline in their health condition and avoidable hospitalization. Findings include:R901A complaint received by the State Agency revealed that R901 was admitted to the facility for recovery after hospitalization and did not receive care/services as ordered by the hospital for hours after admission to the facility. R901's family had to transport the resident back to the hospital late at night (around midnight) as they were upset with the care/services that were not provided timely after admission to the facility. The report further revealed that the complainant had filed a police report after they were informed (over the phone) by a facility staff member that they were unable to find the nurse assigned to care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This complaint pertains to complaint 2587774 and 1361575.Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to ensure nursing professional standards were consistently followed for two (R907 and R910) of two residents reviewed for nursing standards, when staff failed to reconcile the medication orders for R907 for an extended period; and failed to administer timely as ordered and document medication administration for R910. This deficient practice has the potential for adverse effect/interaction from improper dose/time and overall decline in health condition with/without avoidable hospitalization. Findings include:R910 Record review revealed R910 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R901’s admitting diagnoses included left radius (forearm) fracture and right humerus (upper arm bone) fracture from a fall and recent (outpatient) surgery on the left forearm on 8/15/25, anxiety disorder, high blood pressure, heart failure, and aortic stenosis (narrowed or stiff heart valve making it hard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This intake pertains to intake # 2587857.Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly label, and date opened insulin pens for two of two residents (R911 and R912) reviewed for medication storage, resulting in insulin pens being mixed up and the potential to administer the incorrect insulin to a resident and adverse reactions. Findings include:Complaint 2587857On 8/20/25 at approximately 9:19 AM, an observation of the Maple East cart was made and a review of insulin was made with the Unit Manager B and Nurse L. It was noted that R911 had a Lantus insulin pen with their name on it but the insulin pen was in a bag with R912's name on it. The medication cart also had a total of 6 insulin pens with no date of when they were opened. An interview was conducted at the same time the medication cart was observed with Unit Manger B and Nurse L, they were asked about the residents' insulin that was in the incorrect resident's bag and should insulin pens be dated upon opening. Nurse L reported that the medication should have been labeled for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake(s) #: MI00151883 and MI00153034. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate electronic medical records for two (R904 and R906) out of six residents reviewed for medical records. Complaints were filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged residents were not receiving Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Shower Care on a regular basis and not receiving medication timely. R904 On 5/13/25 at approximately 12:08 PM, R904 was observed sitting in a wheelchair. Their hair appeared greasy, and they had long nails. The resident was alert and able to answer most questions asked. When asked if they received ADL care including nail and shower/bath care, R904 reported that they have not received a shower since being admitted to the facility at the end of April 2025. R904 reported that they do not like showers but needed to have their hair washed and agreed that their nails were long. A review of R904's clinical record revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 3/25/22 at 9:10 AM, during an initial observation of the kitchen, 4 whole, foil-wrapped frozen turkey breasts were observed in the sink basin. The faucet was running with a thin stream of running water flowing over 1 of the frozen turkey breasts. On 3/25/25 at 12:00 PM, all 4 turkey breasts were still in the sink basin, this time with no running water. When queried at that time, Dietary Staff CC stated he was getting ready to cook the turkey, which would be served on the following day. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.13 Thawing, Except as specified in (D) of this section, POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FOOD (TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD) shall be thawed: 1.(A) Under refrigeration that maintains the FOOD temperature at 5ºC (41ºF) or less; or 2. (B) Completely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI00150969 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect for three (R60, R52 and R318) of four resident reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights revised 5/14/24 read in part, .The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility . Facility staff will assist residents in exercising their rights . R60 On 3/25/25 at 5:16 PM, R60 was observed sitting in a wheelchair, their Family Member (FM) V was sitting on R60's bed. R60 was asked about care at the facility. R60 explained the day before they needed to be changed, no one was answering the call light so they yelled out because the nurse station was near their room . a staff member came into their room and told them that they did not have enough patience and that she was just coming on to her shift. R60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that grievances/concerns were promptly documented, investigated, tracked and resolved for two residents (R7 and R60) of six residents that participate in the resident council (RC) meetings. Findings include: On 3/26/25 at approximately 11:03 a.m., during the group meeting, the group of residents was queried if the facility had provided resolution to the concerns they were bringing to the regular resident council meetings. R60 reported they were unaware of the plans were to fix any of the issues they bring up in resident council because nobody tells them what they are doing. R7 reported the facility staff just tell them they will fix it and do not follow-up with the council on how, which is why call lights response is an issue every month. On 3/26/25 a review of the previous six months of resident council minutes was conducted and revealed the following concerns noted by the residents: 1. Date of meeting-10-24-24 .New Business: .Hskpg (housekeeping)./Laundry - Occasional long wait for returns of personal .*Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00151101, MI00150969 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided prompt response to answering call light requests for four (R7, R60, R17, R37) of four reviewed for Activities of Daily Living resulting in R7 left in a soiled brief for an extended period on 3/25/25 leading to concern of developing an infection. Findings Include: Clinical record review revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of stroke resulting in impaired mobility with right sided weakness, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and diabetes. R7 was identified as incontinent of bladder and bowel and had a history of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI's). Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 1/18/25 revealed R7 scored 14/15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 3/25/25 at 10:09 AM, during initial introduction, R7 voiced concern that they had been lying in bed with a soiled brief for hours and that the staffing is so bad,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00151325 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions timely and consistently as recommended/indicated for two (R48 and R38) of four residents reviewed for accidents resulting in the potential for further falls, elopements, and avoidable accidents. Findings include: R48 Record review revealed R48 was a long-term resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R48 was recently transferred to hospital on 3/19/25 for further evaluation due to altered mental status after a fall and they were readmitted back to the facility on 3/21/25. R48's admitting diagnoses included dementia, anxiety disorder, heart and renal failure with history of falls. Based on the Brief Interview for Status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE], R48 had a score of 0/15, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R48 needed moderate (staff assistance less than 50%) from bed to wheelchair;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed perform appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration (R80, R35, R59), and wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing service/care to resident(s) (R45, and R365) who were on contact precautions and enhanced barrier precautions respectively, for five of five residents reviewed for infection prevention/control practices resulting in the potential for cross-contamination with likelihood for spread of infection. Findings include: R365 R365 was admitted to the facility for skilled nursing and rehabilitation on 3/18/25. R365's admitting diagnoses included hemiplegia (stroke), urinary tract infection, pneumonia and Clostridioides difficile (C. Diff) infection of the colon (Bacterial infection in the longest part of the large intestine. Symptoms can range from diarrhea to life-threatening damage to the colon) and dementia. During an initial observation completed on 3/26/25 at approximately 8:15 AM. R365's door had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate a resident with the appropriate bed for one Resident (R92) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/10/25, revealed R92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including asthma, atrial fibrillation (heart rhythm disorder), anxiety, and depression. R92 required maximal assistance with bed mobility and was dependent for toileting. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 15/15, which showed R92 was cognitively intact. R92 was 67 tall (5', 7) and weighed 281 pounds. On 3/25/25 at 12:57 p.m., R92 was observed in a bariatric hospital bed, wearing a gown. R92 was wearing oxygen via a nasal cannula, with their head of bed elevated. Their feet were observed resting on the wooden footboard of their bed. On 3/25/25 at 1:00 p.m., R92 stated, My bed is too short. R92 reported they slid down in their bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Nursing standards of practice were followed for medication administration for one resident (R7) of one residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include: On 3/26/25 at approximately 11:01 a.m., during the resident council meeting, R7 indicated that they had an issue with the facility failing to ensure they received their pain medications. R7 indicated the facility had run out of their medication on multiple occasions. On 3/26/25 the medical record for R7 was reviewed and revealed the following: R7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Congestive heart failure and Chronic kidney disease. A review of R7's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/18/25 revealed R7 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. A review of R7's comprehensive plan of care revealed the following: [R7] is at risk for pain r/t (related to): Anemia,Impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to transcribe and implement treatment orders as prescribed by the Physician for one resident (R18) reviewed of one resident reviewed for edema. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and required physical therapy for a decline in function from left shoulder surgery. R18 had a functional ability deficit related to stroke with left sided weakness which required assistance with self-care and mobility. R18 required diuretic therapy related to their history of hypertension and edema. The Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) scored on 3/10/25 was 15/15 indicating R18 had no cognitive impairment. On 3/25/25 at 10:01 AM, R18 was observed in their room, sitting in a wheelchair watching television. Both lower extremities were observed swollen, shiny, and reddened with scattered dry scabs. Both legs were exposed (open to air) and observed with areas on the front and back of the calves with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate standards of care including lack of proper positioning and adequate documentation for two Residents (R81 and R312) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R81: Review of R81's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/15/25, revealed R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including stroke, dementia, quadriplegia, malnutrition, adult failure to thrive and seizure disorder. The assessment revealed R81 was dependent for all care, bed mobility, and transfers, and had seven pressure ulcers, with two not present on admission. It was noted R81 had a urinary catheter and an ostomy. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 3/15, which showed R81 had severe cognitive impairment. On 3/25/25 at 1:49 p.m., the wound care nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, was asked about R81's wounds. LPN C confirmed two of their pressure ulcers were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00150969 Based on interview and record review facility failed to implement appropriate and consistent weight monitoring for one (R360) of six residents reviewed for nutrition resulting in the potential for unidentified weight loss and malnutrition with overall decline. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency revealed that R360 was admitted to the facility and did not have any appetite and was not eating well. Family had requested to transfer to the hospital because of their concern related to intake and weight loss. Additional information received via e-mail revealed that R360 was readmitted to hospital after family request and their weight was 231 pounds (lbs.) when they were readmitted to hospital; there was a 28 lbs. weight loss based on previous hospital weight (259 lbs.) prior to initial admission to the facility. The complaint also revealed that the facility failed to obtain an accurate admission weight and failed to monitor R360's weight throughout…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide comprehensive behavioral care management for one Resident (R12) of one resident reviewed for behavior health services. Findings include: Review of R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/25, revealed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and adjustment disorder. The assessment showed R12 was independent with toileting, transfers, and walking. The sensory assessment revealed R12 was sometimes able to understand, and sometimes able to be understood, and had no vision or hearing impairment. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 3/15, which showed R12 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R12 had aggressive and wandering behaviors towards residents and staff in the past month, including two resident-to-resident incidents. On 3/25/25 at 11:35 a.m., R12 was observed in their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications, including medications used for treatments, were appropriately stored and in a safe manner for four residents (R45, R46, R81 and R7) of four residents reviewed for safe storage. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Medication/Treatment Cart Use revised 8/15/23 read in part, .The nursing staff uses the medication/treatment cart to systematically distribute physician ordered medications to residents . The medication/treatment cart and its storage bins are kept locked until the specified time of medication/treatment administration . R46 On 3/27/25 at 11:23 PM, upon entering R46's room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, who served as the Wound Care Nurse, a bottle of Half Strength Dakin Solution (a dilute sodium hypocholorite solution commonly known as bleach) was observed on the three drawer cabinet next to R46's bed. The bottle was labeled with an open date of 3/14/25. LPN C was asked about the bottle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a laboratory diagnostic (lab) was completed in a timely manner per the Physician's order for one resident (R13) of one residents reviewed for laboratory diagnostics. Findings include: On 03/25/25 the medical record for R13 was reviewed and revealed the following: R13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Heart failure and Chronic kidney disease. A review of R13's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/23/25 revealed R13 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. A Physicians order dated 2/25/25 revealed the following: STAT (immediate) CBC (complete blood count) W DIFF (with differential) CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel) Further review of the medical record did not reveal any CBC results from the lab order dated 2/25/25. On 3/27/25 at approximately 9:20 a.m., Nurse manager AA (NM AA) was queried regarding the lab order for the CBC with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide alternate menus and alternate meal choices for one Resident (R312) of one resident reviewed for menus. Findings include: Review of the R312's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/16/25, revealed R312 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, kidney failure, femur fracture, and malnutrition. R312 was independent with eating, was 68 inches tall, and weighed 176 pounds. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 14/15, which showed R312 was cognitively intact. On 3/25/25 at 12:03 p.m., R312 was observed lying in their hospital bed, with their Family Member, FM II , seated in their room. FM II reported R312 did not like the lunch entree so they went to a local restaurant and brought them a meal. FM II stated they had asked facility staff for an alternative menu several times, and none was provided, which R312 confirmed. R312 stated, None of the food tastes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an attractive palatable pureed meal to one resident (R45) of one resident reviewed for meal service, resulting in verbalized complaints and dissatisfaction with meal service and potential for weight loss. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of recurrent cerebral vascular accidents (stroke), resulting in left sided weakness, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and required a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a surgically placed tube into the stomach to provide nutrition). R45 had vascular dementia, and the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessed on 1/25/25 scored 11/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the dietary progress note dated 11/5/24 revealed R45 had received pureed pleasure trays (pleasure feeding offers comfort through the enjoyment of food) in addition to their ordered nutrition via PEG. R45 was identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00150135. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide scheduled showers for one resident (R702) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living, resulting in verbalized complaints and frustration with the provision of care. Findings include: On 2/12/25, a clinical record reviewed revealed R702 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation and continued medical care on 1/17/25 after being hospitalized for a recurrent stroke which resulted in R702 having a new onset of ride sided weakness, aphasia (difficulty speaking), and bowel and bladder incontinence. Their medical history included: diabetes, uterine cancer, and left nephrectomy (removal of kidney). R702's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored totaled 15/15 indicating intact cognition. On 2/12/25 at 11:41 AM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) A confirmed residents are provided showers/bathing twice a week. RN A provided a white binder stored at the Nurses station that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00149847 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered dressing changes for pressure ulcers were performed for one resident (R701) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the potential for worsening of wounds and development of infections. Findings include: On 2/12/25 at 8:51 AM, R701 was observed in their bed with their eyes closed. R701 had kerlix (dressing wrap) on their bilateral lower extremities. On 2/12/25 at 9:32 AM, a review of R701's clinical record revealed they re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Their diagnoses included: osteomyelitis (bone infection), sepsis, protein calorie malnutrition, failure to thrive, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, quadriplegia, presence of a feeding tube, urinary catheter, and colostomy. Continued review of the record included a wound care note dated 2/11/24 that indicated they had multiple pressure ulcers including a sacrum, right hip, and right calf…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00149847. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transmission based precautions were implemented for one resident, (R701) of three residents revealed for infections, resulting in the potential for the development of infection. Findings include: On 2/12/25 at 8:50 AM, R701's room was observed. The door of the room did not contain any signage to indicate they were on any TBP (transmission based precautions), nor were there any PPE (personal protective equipment) supplies (gowns, gloves, masks, etc.) outside or in the vicinity of the room. On 2/12/25 at 8:51 AM, R701 was observed in their bed with their eyes closed. A tube feeding pump delivering tube feeding formula, a urinary catheter drainage bag hung on the left side of the bed, and an intravenous infusion of antibiotics being delivered via PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line were observed. On 2/12/25 at 9:32 AM, a review of R701's clinical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00149338. Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed to document and promptly resolve grievances/concerns reported to facility staff for one resident (R901) of three residents reviewed for grievances. Findings include: On 1/29/25, a complaint received by the State Agency was reviewed that alleged the facility failed to follow-up on care and abuse concerns that R901 had allegedly experienced and that the facility administration was aware of of the concerns. On 1/29/25 at approximately 9:46 a.m., during a conversation with a person who preferred to remain anonymous, the person reported that R901 had experienced a few incidents of improper care that the administration staff should have been aware of on 1/3/25 and 1/4/25 that needed to be investigated including R901 being told by a Nurse that their breasts were exposed in the hallway and that a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) had refused to assist R901 in wiping up during their use of the restroom. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake: MI00148683. Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff followed proper procedures for sanitation and food storage, this had the ability to affect all 78 of 78 residents that resided in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: On 12/9/24 at 8:30 AM, a kitchen tour was conducted with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) A. Upon observation in the refrigerated food storage was a large white tub of ricotta cheese with the top ajar with no open date noted. When asked about the tub, CDM A stated it was not dated because it was not opened yet. CDM A was asked to lift the top of the ricotta which revealed a plastic film fully ripped off the tub of ricotta. This indicated the ricotta tub had previously been opened. On the top shelf of the refrigerated storage area stored with food was an insulin pen with CDM A's name noted on the pen. CDM A was asked if the insulin pen belonged to them and they confirmed that it did. CDM A was asked why they stored their insulin pen on the shelves with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00148683. Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to timely identify, intervene, and notify the physician of a change in respiratory condition for one (R901) of three residents reviewed for a change of condition, resulting in the delayed care, delayed notification to the physician/practitioner and ultimately requiring a transfer to the hospital for a higher level of care. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns regarding negligence of the facility staff to have not identified R901's respiratory distress timely and concern of the facility staff to have ignored the abnormal respiratory respirations tracked by the facility's wall devices that monitor the residents vitals. The complainant noted in part . found her (R901) having immense difficulty breathing, using muscles in her chest, neck and abdomen to breathe. I went to get staff. They responded slowly to this emergent situation and took her oxygen level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00148683. Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to consistently implement and apply wound treatments as ordered by the practitioner timely, failed to consistently identify and report worsening of the wound to the Wound Practitioner (WP) and failed to document clinical reasons and/or justification for the change of an antibiotic treatment, and the delayed/missed IV (Intravenous) and oral antibiotics for a wound infection, for one (R901) of three residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in delayed and omitted treatments and transfers to the hospital for higher level of care. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility's failure to provide adequate and appropriate care to prevent and care for an infected pressure wound. Review of the medical record revealed R901 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included a fracture to the neck of the right femur and required staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00148683. Based on interview and record review the facility staff failed to ensure all required documentation for a transfer to the hospital was documented in the medical record for one (R901) of three residents reviewed for a change of condition. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented multiple concerns of negligent care provided by the facility that resulted in multiple hospitalizations. Review of the medical record revealed R901 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included a fracture to the neck of the right femur. R901 was admitted for rehabilitation. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Review of the progress notes revealed the following: A Nursing note dated 11/3/24 at 10:15 AM, documented hospitalized . A Nursing note dated 11/8/24 at 4:42 PM, documented in part . arrived…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-13 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97OrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
KHAN, ANISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
PACKEY, DREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
PERUSKI, BRADLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/18/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235733. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next