Notting Hill of West Bloomfield
6535 Drake Rd, West Bloomfield, MI 48322 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (248) 592-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $167,213 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-14)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.8% | 10.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.6% | 4.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.2% | 12.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.5% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.2% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.1% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.1% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.3% | 11.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.46 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.40 | 1.64 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 176 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.5%CMS range 52.3–68.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.1–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 56.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.0%CMS range 6.3–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 95.8 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake 2806062 and Intake 2807263. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an injury of unknown origin for one Resident (R65) of four residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in R65 sustaining a right arm fracture during care, with increased pain and discomfort. Findings include:A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 3/08/26 at 4:01 p.m., revealed, The nurse on duty was informed by a nurse aide that the resident appeared to be in pain and that her arm locked abnormally while care was being performed. The nurse assessed the resident and contacted the physician. The physician advised that the resident be sent to ER (Emergency Room) for further evaluation. At the hospital, it was confirmed that the resident had a fracture. The family was notified. The facility will conduct a complete investigation to determine the cause.Investigation Summary:.According to the physician's note and hospital records, the resident was diagnosed with a right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00151142, MI00152404 and MI00151259. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective interventions to prevent falls and accidents for three of three residents (R804, R806, and R807) reviewed for accidents, resulting in R806 falling and fracturing both legs, R804 sucking on a bleach sheet, and R807 exiting an alarmed door and going down a flight of stairs. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency alleged a resident sustained an avoidable fall. R806 On 5/14/25 at 12:45 PM, a review of a facility provided document titled, FACILITY PAST NON-COMPLIANCE/QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) PLAN was conducted and read, .The plan of care was not implemented while preparing the resident (R806) for transfer to shower chair. The CENA (Certified Nurse Aide 'G') was preparing the resident to be transferred into shower chair and waiting on the second person to assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #' MI00149666, MI00149701, MI00149703 and MI00149863. Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse and neglect by facility staff for two residents (R901 and R902) of five residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment resulting in R901 being forcefully slapped in the face by a staff member and R902's lower extremities being wheeled into a medication cart and a metal doorframe. Findings include: R901 On 2/12/25 a facility reported incident (FRI) that was submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which indicated R901 was slapped in the face by Certified Nursing Assistant A (CNA A) on the morning of 1/18/25. On 2/12/25 at approximately 8:56 a.m., R901 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R901 was observed to have a low bed with their wheelchair against the wall. R901 was observed to be confused and unable to follow specific conversation pertaining to the allegation. On 2/12/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00147948. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, timely treat, and identify the worsening of a diabetic ulcer for one (R801) of two residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in a hospital transfer facilitated by an outside provider which resulted in an amputation of R801's left great toe. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) revealed an allegation R801 was not assessed for a change in condition. On 11/18/24, an unannounced, onsite investigation was conducted. A review of R801's clinical record revealed R801 was admitted into the facility on 9/11/23, had readmissions on 6/21/24 and 9/5/24, and discharged on 11/5/24 with diagnoses that included: acute osteomyelitis (bone infection) right ankle and foot, acquired absence of right toes, peripheral vascular disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed R801 had moderately impaired cognition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00141604 & MI00142153. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to accurately complete Braden assessments, implement preventive/effective interventions for pressure wounds, Implement wound treatments timely or at all, accurately implement Dietician orders to aide in wound healing, and consistently identified worsening of the wounds for two (R's 502 & 504) of two residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in R502 to have developed multiple wounds which included a Stage 4 sacrum pressure ulcer and a Stage 3 right ear pressure ulcer and for R504 to have developed a Stage 4 coccyx pressure ulcer that contributed to their hospitalization, severe sepsis and death. Findings include: R502 Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility's failure to prevent the development and worsening of a pressure ulcer for R502. Review of the medical record revealed R502 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00139564. This citation has two deficient practice statements (DPS). DPS #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine the root cause of falls and implement effective interventions to prevent falls for two (R26 and R90) of four residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in R26 sustaining a closed right hip fracture femur fracture that required Open Reduction Internal Fixation surgery (a surgery used to stabilize and heal a broken bone) which caused subsequent pain and thoughts of being better off if she was dead. Findings include: On 12/13/23 at 12:13 PM, R26 was observed in their room seated in a wheelchair. R26's call light was activated at that time, as indicated by a light that was lit outside their door. When interviewed, R26 reported they wanted to get into bed. R26 stated, I want to do it myself, but I'm too scared. But I am so tired. R26 was unable to say how long ago they activated their call light. At approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread foodborne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 03/23/2026 at 9:00 AM observed a food item discard date schedule posted on the walk-in cooler (WIC) door which included a 14-day discard for cheeses and pepperoni. During this observation when asked about this policy, the Dietary Manager (DM) L said this is a corporate policy. On 03/23/2026 at 9:06 AM observed a facility container of shredded mozzarella cheese with an attached facility provided date marking sticker indicating prep/open date of 3/21/26 and a use by date of 4/4/26. During this observation when asked about the facility provided use by date, DM L referred to the corporate policy of 14-days use and indicated that this product was typically used within 7 days. DM L also indicated that the product would be re-labeled with a 7-day use by/discard date.On 03/23/2026 at 9:59 AM observed in the 2nd floor nourishment room an opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly dispose of waste and maintain dumpster area to mitigate the presence of pests, potentially affecting all residents in the facility. Findings include:On 3/23/2026 at 12:31 PM observed two overfilled wheeled trash bins and a foul odor present in the 1st floor soiled linen/trash collection room.On 03/23/2026 at 2:00 PM observed two outdoor waste receptacles located in separate enclosures adjacent to each other. The first waste receptacle was observed with both the top lid and sliding access door left open with scattered debris present around the enclosure. The second waste receptacle was observed with the top lid in the open position, and an accumulation of cardboard, plastic bags, gloves, wrappers and other debris scattered along the side and in a matted pile behind the unit. On 03/23/2026 at 2:18 PM an interview with Assistant Maintenance Supervisor (AMS) A found that housekeeping staff are responsible for maintaining the outdoor waste receptacle area and small objects that may surround it, while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake #2694463. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), failed to ensure infection control standards and practices were consistently implemented by the facility staff and failed to implement an effective infection control surveillance program. This deficient practice has the increased potential to result the in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility and the spread of infection to residents. Findings Include:On 03/23/26 at 11:50 AM observed a functional hopper in soiled laundry sorting room. When the hopper faucet was turned on, discolored water ran for a few seconds before running clear. On 03/23/2026 at 2:05 PM an interview with Assistant Maintenance Supervisor (AMS) A found the Maintenance Director left suddenly two weeks ago. On 03/23/2026 at 2:06 PM observed one boiler at 128 degrees F…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake 2793611.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor mealtime preferences for six of eight confidential residents that attended the resident council meeting, resulting in expressed feelings of discontent, isolation from peers and loss of autonomy. Findings include:Review of allegations reported to the State Agency included concerns that the resident was given the incorrect diet.On 3/23/26 at 12:27 PM, observation of the facility's main dining room revealed there were nine residents present. Residents were observed interacting with one another and staff were observed obtaining orders for the meal from each resident (Restaurant-like style).On 3/24/26 at 11:00 AM, a confidential meeting was held with eight residents that usually attended the facility's resident council meetings. When asked about how they felt the facility's dining/meal process was, six of the eight residents voiced concerns that the dining room was closed frequently, including not open at all on the weekends. The residents reported they enjoyed getting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake 2741968.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment throughout multiple resident rooms and hallways affecting multiple residents including R17, R31, R87, R91, R100, R110, R125 and eight of eight residents that attended the confidential group interview. Findings include: Observations that were conducted from 3/23/26 - 3/24/26 identified the following environmental concerns: The inner bottom portion of the handrails throughout the second-floor west hallway were observed to have food and debris (potato chips, pink and white popcorn, straw wrappers and used tissues) items that were not cleaned/maintained. Additionally, there were multiple resident room doors that were observed heavily soiled with dirt, debris and unknown substances. The private dining room doors were observed to be heavily soiled with dirt and debris and what appeared to be a liquid that had splattered and dried. On 3/24/26 at 7:56 AM, R17's room was observed to have the entire corner wall with missing drywall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2741968. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 18 residents (R25, R41, R123, R46, R61, R65, R72, R78, R81, R87, R90, R91, R93 and R109) of 19 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment, resulting in pain, missed medication administration, treatments and assessments. Findings include: On 03/23/2026 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed that alleged the facility failed to ensure a Nurse was assigned to a block of resident rooms (Rooms 125-147) on 12/28/25. On 3/24/26 at approximately 10:08 a.m., Family member Q (FM Q) was interviewed via phone pertaining to allegations that the facility did not have a Nurse assigned to the Orchard Lake block of rooms on 12/28/25. FM Q reported that R123 not receive any of their day shift medications on 12/28/25 until approximately 9:00 PM. FM Q indicated they drove up to the facility in the afternoon and addressed the concern with Nurse J who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2679285 and 2741968.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for four (R43, R44, R87 and R110) of four residents reviewed for medication administration, and five of eight residents that attended the confidential group interview; And the facility failed to ensure wound dressings were identified, assessed, changed per physician orders and/or dated for two (R13 and R112) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include:Review of multiple complaints reported to the State Agency included allegations that medications were not being administered per physician orders. On 3/24/26 at 11:00 AM, a confidential resident council interview with conducted with eight residents that normally attend the resident council meetings. When asked if anyone had concerns with their medication administration, five residents verbalized concerns. Their responses included: Last night in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #'s 2741968, 2679285 and 2694463. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient Nurse staffing levels to meet resident needs for three residents (R13, R48, R74 and R102) and multiple anonymous residents that participated in the group meeting of a total census of 106, resulting in long wait times for staff assistance and delay in medication administration and treatments. Findings include: Resident Group Interview: On 3/24/26 at 11:00 AM, a confidential resident council interview was conducted with eight residents that normally attend the resident council meetings. When asked about if they got the help and care they needed without having to wait a long time and if staff responded to their call light timely, eight of eight residents verbalized concerns. Their responses included: Last night in our wing, we didn't have a Nurse until 12:00 AM. The day nurse was here all day. So when they are late with medication, what are we supposed to do? Double up? That's a big problem. They sit and talk at nursing station I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics and includes a system of monitoring to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance. Findings include:On 3/23/26 an interview was conducted with Infection control preventionist (ICP) JJ. They were asked to explain the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. ICP JJ reported that they make sure that residents meet McGeer's criteria, make sure staff are following protocol and procedures, educate staff on the importance of following infection control policies, and utilize audits and an infection screening tool that they use to interview patients to see if they meet criteria. ICP JJ was asked when they started in their position and reported that they started in November of 2025 and was hired for strictly Infection control, but the staffing was not the best at the facility so they had been working as a floor nurse and doing infection control when they could or had time. ICP JJ also reported that the facility had completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for the safe self-administration of medication and to have medication kept at bedside for one (R105) of one resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. Findings include:On 3/23/26 at 9:50 AM, during an interview with R105 there was a large oblong cream-colored pill observed in the top bedside dresser drawer that was opened. When asked about the pill, R105 reported, Yeah that's my gabapentin (pain medication) they (Nurse) left me that the other day. I took it cause they double dosed my one dose and there were two in there. I said to them here I'm taking this and saving for when I'm in pain. It's for nerve pains in my leg, they feel like bee stings and hurt like hell. So, I just took it and saved it.On 3/23/26 at 10:13 AM, Nurse Manager (NM 'M') was asked about the facility's process for residents keeping medication at bedside. NM 'M' reported the only time should be if they are assessed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure acceptable standards of nursing care and services were provided for one (R14) out of six residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:A review of R14's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and anxiety disorder. A review of the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed R14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 (intact cognition).Continued review of R14's clinical record, documented, in part, the following:2/2/26: Administration Note: .appears she is spitting out the medication in her room, under the bed. (Authored by Registered Nurse (RN) HH)3/22/26: Administration Note : .Patient appears to have been hoarding all of her medications and throwing them away under the bed. It appears to be several days of medication found. (Authored By RN HH)Care Plan: Focus: (R14) is at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2793611Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were ordered, completed as ordered, wound care was provided timely, and accurate skin assessments were completed for two (R2 and R115) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include:R2 Review of R2's MDS assessment, dated 3/08/26, revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (narrowing of spine), polyneuropathy (nerve impingement), kidney disease, and urinary retention. The skin assessment showed R2 was admitted with one stage 3 pressure ulcer (the wound dept extends beyond the skin layers) and a surgical wound. On 3/23/26 at 2:16 p.m., R2 confirmed their right foot pressure injury was on their heel, and said the wound developed at home and at the hospital, when they pushed into their mattress too hard in bed repeatedly due to back pain. R2 said their wound care at this facility was supposed to be completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities identified by the consultant pharmacist and signed by the physician were completed for two (R9 and R19) of five residents reviewed for monthly medication regimen reviews [MMR's]. Findings include: R19 Review of the clinical record revealed R19 was admitted into the facility on 3/19/21 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's Disease, dementia and hallucinations. According to the Minimum Data Set [MDS] assessment dated [DATE], R19 had severely impaired cognition. Review of monthly pharmacist medication reviews revealed there were irregularities with R19's medication on 8/15/25. No documentation of what the irregularities were, or what the physician's response to the irregularity was found in R19's clinical record. An email was sent to the facility requesting the pharmacist recommendation and the physician response for R19 on 8/15/25 on 3/25/26 at 8:50 AM. No documentation was provided prior to the end of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than five percent with a percentage of 6.45. Findings include: On 3/23/26 at 9:18 AM, a medication administration pass was completed with Registered Nurse (RNHH). RNHH was observed pulling medications from the pack and administered Lasix 20mg(milligrams), multivitamin, MiraLAX 17 g(grams) Duloxetine 60 mg, allopurinol 100 mg, carvedilol 3.125, vitamin B12 and lisinopril 5 mg.On 3/23/26 at 12:38 PM, a review of the medical administration record was made and the following errors were discovered. Duloxetine 60 mg was ordered as DULoxetine HCl Capsule Delayed Release Particles 60 MG Give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for depression. It was ordered to be given at bedtime and was giving during the morning medication pass. There was also an order for Famotidine Oral Tablet 20 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for GERD (Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease) IN THE MORNING and it was not observed being given but was signed off on the medication administration record as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two (R9 and R19) of five residents reviewed for monthly regimen reviews [MRR's]. Findings include: R9 A review of R9's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: traumatic ischemia, schizoaffective disorder and Alzheimer's. According to the MDS assessment the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 (severely impaired cognition). Review of the monthly medication reviews revealed there were irregularities with R9's medication as follows: 9/16/25, 11/14/25, 12/9/25, 1/16/26, 2/11/26. No documentation of the physician response to the irregularities was in R9's clinical record. On 3/25/26 at 11:07 AM, the Director of Nursing [DON] was interviewed and asked about R9's MRR dated 9/16/25, 11/14/25, 12/9/25, 1/16/26, 2/11/26. The DON explained she could find no documentation in the chart, so she had asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2574455Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for one resident (R701), of two residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for undetected incidences of abuse. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency alleged R701 was intentionally handled roughly causing a skin tear to their forearm.On 11/25/25 at 9:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the complainant, and they alleged a facility staff member intentionally caused a skin tear to R701's during a transfer from the toilet to their wheelchair. They reported R701 told the staff member they were hurting them, and rather than stop grabbing them by their forearm the staff member grabbed it tighter causing a skin tear.On 11/25/25 at 9:53 AM, a review of R701's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the emergency room on [DATE]. R701's diagnoses included: left pubis fracture, heart failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2660427.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care for a cholecystostomy tube (biliary drainage tube inserted into the gall bladder to relieve symptoms of gall bladder disease) consistent with professional standards and in accordance with Physician orders for one (R704) of one resident reviewed with a cholecystostomy (biliary) tube resulting in a delay of surgical intervention to exchange R704's biliary catheter.Findings include:A complaint was filed with the State Agency on 10/31/25 alleging the facility did not provide care for a cholecystostomy biliary drain consistent with professional standards and in accordance with Physician orders. On 11/25/25 at 9:26 AM, a telephone interview with R704's family (complainant) confirmed on October 11, 2025, while visiting with R704 they had observed drainage from the area of the biliary drain which grossly soiled R704's linens and clothing. The family had to get a nurse at which time they observed the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake Number: 2563408.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food in the kitchen was labeled and dated when opened or prepared. This had the potential to affect all residents who eat food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 8/6/25 at 9:20 AM, an observation of the refrigerators and freezer in the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Aide 'F'. The following observations were made:Two opened containers of sour cream were stored in the walk-in refrigerator and were not dated. DA 'F' reported they should have been dated when opened.In one of the reach-in refrigerators, the following was observed: A tray of prepared fruit cups was not labeled with a prepared on or use by date. One container of ranch salad dressing was opened and undated. One contained of Italian salad dressing was opened and undated. DA 'F' stated, We use the dressing quickly.In a second reach-in refrigerator, the following was observed: A tray of prepared fruit (sliced pears) was not labeled or dated. A tray that contained slices of sweet potato pie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 1245809Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent excessive tension and tugging of an indwelling urinary catheter for one resident (R702) of two residents reviewed for catheter care, resulting in a penile full thickness urethral tear. Findings include:Clinical record review revealed R704 was admitted [DATE] post hospitalization for lower spinal and sacral area wound infections. Due to wound healing to the sacrum and history of urinary retention, R702 maintained a temporary Foley Catheter (Indwelling catheter inserted into the urethra to drain urine) and required further medical, wound care and rehabilitation treatment. The BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score assessed on 6/12/25 totaled 15/15 indicating R704 was cognitively intact.Clinical record review of Wound Care Progress note dated 6/9/25 by Wound Care Physician C documented a newly identified wound as .Wound #7 Penis is a full Thickness Medical Device Related Injury.On 8/5/25 at 9:55 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00151259 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure regularly scheduled/routine bathing was offered for one resident (R802) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: On 5/14/25 a complaint submitted to the State Agency was reviewed that alleged R802 was not being provided regular scheduled bathing. On 5/14/25 at approximately 9:10 a.m., R802 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R802 was queried if the facility had been offering and providing regularly scheduled bathing and they reported that staff were missing their showers and that R802 prefers showers in the afternoon/evenings. R802 reported if they did not want a shower at that time, nobody comes back to offer it again later and the staff say they refuse. R802 was queried how often the staff are offering showers and they reported that they were lucky if they got bathed once a week and that they needed more than that because they sweat a a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00150658 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain medications were refilled timely, pulled from the back-up medication supply for administration and administer pain medications per physician orders for one resident (R803) of two residents reviewed for pain management, resulting in uncontrolled pain and a transfer to the emergency room for pain management. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency alleged the facility failed to administer pain medications per physician's orders. On 5/14/25 at 9:25 AM, a review of R803's closed clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had multiple emergency room discharges and re-admissions to the facility. R803's diagnoses included: morbid obesity, urinary tract infection, diabetes, high blood pressure, peripheral vascular disease, and depression. A review of R803's progress notes was conducted and revealed the following: A progress note dated 1/25/25 at 8:25 PM entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00151259 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored for one resident (R802) of three residents reviewed for food preferences/palatability. Findings include: On 5/14/25 a complaint submitted to the State Agency was reviewed that alleged R802 was not being provided good tasting food according to their preferences. On 5/14/25 at approximately 9:10 a.m., R802 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R802 was queried if the facility had been providing food according to their liking and they indicated they had not. R802's breakfast meal tray was observed to contain scrambled eggs and a sausage patty. R802 reported the facility kept getting their meal ticket wrong and that they were supposed to be served double portions and have cheese on their eggs. R802 indicated the kitchen could not get their meal right and they won't eat it and the food is always cold. At that time, R802's food was not projecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 1/14/25 between 9:00 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) Q, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there was an undated container of salad, an opened undated bag of diced chicken, and an opened, undated bag of polish sausage. DM Q confirmed the items should have been dated. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17: Ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less for a maximum of 7 days. Refrigerated, ready-to- eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and packed by a food processing plant shall be clearly marked, at the time the original…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate privacy for Resident Council group meetings and addressing grievances for four of 14 Confidential (C) residents (C-4, C-7, C-8, C-10) reviewed for organized monthly Resident Council meetings. Findings include: On 1/15/25 at approximately 10:50 a.m., Activity Director (AD) R reported the Resident Council President, C-4, was unable to be in attendance, despite being invited the day before. On 1/15/25 at 11:04 a.m., the group meeting to review resident council per regulatory guidance was held in the Private Dining room, an enclosed room off the main dining room. It was observed there initially were no signs announcing the meeting; signs were placed on the door just prior to the meeting starting . The State Ombudsman (resident advocate), Ombudsman U, was present for the meeting along with the Surveyor. Residents reported they wanted the Ombudsman present and declined for any other staff to be present. There were 13 residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary homelike environment amongst residential common areas including,the central shower room, first floor dinner, room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) resulting in an unkempt environment resulting in potential for resident dissatisfaction with their living conditions and failure to maintain a clean healthcare environment. Findings include: On 1/24/25 at 10:08 AM, An observation of the second-floor resident rooms revealed carpeted floors unkempt, appeared not vacuumed regularly and were observed with paper straw wrappers, and other paper like debris. Passing by residential rooms in the 200 hallway was observed with all rooms having tiled flooring was not mopped and sticky ring marks were noted. room [ROOM NUMBER] floor was observed with a moderate pile of cakelike substance surrounded by a dried sticky ring. The white door facing the residents and entrance to their bathroom area was observed with five moderate sized rings of pink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely/completed assessments and investigations into multiple falls, and identify and implement appropriate fall interventions for one (R85) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 1:25 PM, R85 was observed laying in bed, positioned halfway down the bed with their right leg positioned in the air and resting on a large pillar in the middle of the room, next to their bed. R85 was observed to have a perimeter mattress in place (edges of mattress raised) and was lightly hitting themselves and saying No, no, no. On 1/14/25 at 1:30 PM, a Nurse was observed asking the Nurse Aide to reposition the resident in bed. On 1/15/25 at 7:51 AM, R85 was observed laying in bed, positioned on their back. The perimeter mattress was observed to have additional pillows to the side centers of the mattress on both sides and the bed was positioned lower, but not all the way to the floor. The wheelchair next to the bed was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to consistently ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided for residents who resided in the facility, resulting in verbalized complaints of delayed care and services, lack of supervision of residents with wandering behaviors, and the likelihood for further delayed care and unmet care needs. This deficient practice has the ability to affect all 101 residents in the facility, including resident# (R86). Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Nursing Staffing dated 11/4/2024: .Nursing service is provided by number and type of personnel to ensure that each resident .Receives rehabilitative nursing care as needed; Receives proper care to maintain their highest level of functioning (prevent decline in function or poor clinical outcomes); Is kept clean, comfortable, and well-groomed; Is protected from accidents, injury, and infection .Nursing assistants are expected to carry out their daily assignments in a professional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage and labeling for medications and biologicals in one of six medication carts and one of one treatment cart. This deficient practice has the potential to affect multiple residents throughout the facility, including R70. Findings include: On 1/15/25 at 8:54 AM, Observation of the first-floor central shower room revealed one pink colored oblong sized pill lying on the floor bordering the back corner next to the tub. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C was asked to retrieve and while picking up with their bare hand, said oh that's an omeprazole When inquired how medication is found in the central shower area, LPN C replied that it must have fallen off the medication cart and rolled into the common shower area. On 1/15/25 at 10:15 AM, One small round white pill was lying in common hallway in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. LPN F commented that should not be there and was observed picking up the pill off the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective infection control practices (hand hygiene) during medication pass and implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (R60) of one resident reviewed for a urinary catheter, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination and the development and spread of infection and disease. Findings include: R60 On 1/14/25 at 10:15 AM and 1/15/25 at 7:58 AM, R60 was observed in bed with a urinary catheter drainage bag observed secured to the side of the bed. At each of these observations, there was no signage posted to indicate the resident was on any precautions such as Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and there was no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) available for use. On 1/14/25 at 12:57 PM, the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA 'O') who was assigned to R60 was observed holding a bag of linens just inside the resident's room. When asked about whether they were aware of R60 being on any infection control precautions such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address a resident's specific nutritional needs for one (R297) of four residents reviewed for nutritional care planning. Findings include: Review of the closed clinical record revealed R297 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: other complications of gastric band procedure, sepsis, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, metabolic encephalopathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, altered mental status, and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. The resident was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE] at 12:35 PM and has not returned to the facility. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R297 had no communication concerns, had intact cognition, weight was 359 pounds, with no weight loss or weight gain, had no parenteral/intravenous feeding on admission, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing services met professional standards for medication administration and documentation for one resident (R55) out of one reviewed for self administration. Findings Include: Clinical record review revealed R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a medical history of hepatitis (inflammation of the liver), hypertension, and diabetes. Psychiatric history included major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score assessed on 11/14/24 scored 14/15 indicating R55 was cognitively intact. On 1/14/25 at 10:48 AM, During initial interview, an observation revealed nine scabbed, red colored blister/lesions on forehead, bilateral cheeks, nose and chin. R55 voiced concerns since they had developed the sores, Nursing leaves some kind of lotion at the bedside and has no idea what the lotion is. R55 was observed grabbing two medicine cups filled with a white colored lotion from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure communication devices and services were in place for one (R902) of three residents reviewed for communication, resulting in the potential of unmet care needs. Findings include: A revisit survey was conducted onsite to verify if the facility corrected an identified noncompliance regarding communication services for residents whose primary language was not English. A review of the medical record for R902 revealed their admission to the facility on 1/29/25, with diagnoses that included: dementia and anxiety disorder. A review of a care plan titled . impaired communication noted R902's primary language to be Arabic but noted the resident to speak and understand English and had severely impaired cognition. Documented on the care plan was two interventions- Anticipate and meet needs as needed and Observed for non-verbal indicators of attempts to express self such as tears, furrowing of the brow, pursing of the lips, yelling, grabbing, reaching, gestures etc . On 3/18/25 at approximately 12:50 PM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide timely toileting/brief care for three residents (R78, R31, and R55) of three reviewed for incontinence care, resulting in the resident being left wet for extended periods. Findings include: On 1/15/25 at 2:36 PM, R78 was observed in their room asking an unknown staff member to change them. At that time, R78 was told that they would find someone to help them and exited the room. At 2:45 a nurse entered the room and turned the call light off and exited the room without helping the resident. At 3:10 PM, a certified nurse assistant (CNA) went into the room and assisted R78. On 1/16/25 at 10:30 AM, an observation of the nurse's station revealed a view of the call light board to see how long the call lights had been on. R31's light had been on since 9:51 AM, R78's call light had been on since 10:03 AM. At 10:32 AM, R31 was observed in their room and asked what they needed. R31 asked to be changed and stated that they had been waiting for some time now. At 10:33 AM, R78 was observed in their room and asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a physician was notified of a change in condition for one resident (R78) of one resident reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 10:12 AM, an interview was conducted about the care in the facility with R78 and their family member. R78 stated, It's been fine but, they take a long time to change me. R78 further went on to explain that he felt that 40 minutes to an hour or 2 is too long to be sitting with mess on your bottom. R78 also explained they needed some type of antibiotic for their skin and that it had been itching and burning for a while and told the nurses. Family member II explained that R78 had been calling them for the past month asking if they could take them to the doctor so they can get antibiotics because the spot on their back was hurting and they were afraid it may be an abscess forming. Family member II tried to explain to R78 that they couldn't do that because they had doctors in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative therapy services for one (R25) of one resident reviewed for restorative services and range of motion. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 3:29 p.m., R25 was observed in their hospital bed, with their knees bent partially, and their heels pressing on the bed mattress. Their knees appeared to be lacking in full extension, by about 20 to 30 degrees. On 1/14/25 at 3:31 p.m., R25 was asked if they received restorative therapy services due to their bilateral leg range of motion deficits. R25 reported they were receiving restorative therapy prior to their hospitalization and were unsure why restorative therapy was not doing range of motion, since their legs felt tighter. R25 reported they wanted restorative therapy services to resume and clarified they were not receiving therapy services (physical or occupational therapy) recently. On 1/14/25 at 3:45 p.m., the Restorative Aide, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) X, was asked if R25 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI0048767. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive nutritional assessment and ongoing evaluation per physician order for one (R297) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed with the State Agency included allegations that R297 had not received adequate nutritional assessment and monitoring in accordance with hospital recommendations following a gastric sleeve revision surgery with complications. Review of the closed clinical record revealed R297 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: other complications of gastric band procedure, sepsis, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, metabolic encephalopathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, altered mental status, and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. The resident was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate indication for use, ensure non-pharmacologic interventions were attempted and identify behaviors exhibited prior to the administration of as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (anxiolytic) for one (R85) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R85 was admitted into the facility on 8/26/24 with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis, generalized anxiety disorder (12/4/24), dysthymic disorder (12/4/24), vascular dementia moderate with mood disturbance, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. According to the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R85 had severe cognitive impairment, had no psychosis, no behaviors, and did not receive any antianxiety medication. Further review of the clinical record revealed R85 was started on Alprazolam (Xanax) oral tablet 0.5 MG (Milligrams) by mouth every 12 hours as needed for agitation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain and/or coordinate timely radiology services for an X-Ray for one (R63) of one resident reviewed for radiology/other diagnostic services, resulting in the potential for delayed identification of any abnormalities which may require additional medical/treatment intervention. Findings include: Review of the resident's incident/accident reports provided by the facility for the past three months included a fall incident from 1/11/25 which documented R63 was .lying on the side of the bed on left side . Review of the physician orders following this fall incident included an order for the facility to obtain an X-Ray of R63's Left Shoulder. As of this review on 1/15/25, there was no radiology report available in the electronic medical record. Additional review of the radiology log at the nursing station revealed the most recent entry was on 1/11/25 for another resident and R63's request had not been completed despite the order from 1/13/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pursuing and administration of the pneumococcal and influenza vaccine for one resident (R3) of five reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a medical history of influenza, pneumonia, heart failure, osteoarthritis, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. R3's primary language is Arabic/Chaldean and translation was provided by family, specifically their daughter. A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessed on 11/14/24 scored 15/15 indicating R3 was cognitively intact. On 1/16/25, a clinical record revealed R3 consented on 11/16/24 (via their daughter who is their translator) to receive the influenza and pneumonia vaccinations. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed no documentation that R3 received the elected vaccinations. On 1/16/25 at 9:49 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) A. During record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00147948. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment in the hallway near the main dining room. Findings include: On 11/18/24 at 8:16 AM, a strong, putrid, sour odor was experienced in the hallway that extended from the main dining room to the hallway that led to the lobby. At that time, Registered Dietician (RD) 'E' was asked what the odor was from and reported she thought it was due to a problem with the dish machine. The door to the dish room was located on the hallway where the odor was observed. On 11/18/24 at 8:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the Infection Control Nurse/Staff Development Nurse, Staff 'D' who acknowledged there was a pungent odor in the hallway that ran along side the dining room. On 11/18/24 at 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Housekeeping Supervisor (HK) 'F'. When queried about the odor, HK 'F' reported it was due to an issue with the dish machine that needed repairs. On 11/18/24 at 12:00 PM, an observation was made of the dish room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00146159 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from depravation of goods and services by a nurse for three (R701, R704 and R705) of three residents reviewed for neglect. Findings include: Review of a facility document titled, Charge Nurse Job Description undated read in part, .The Charge Nurse plans, coordinated, provides and manages nursing care, nursing services and health education to nursing home residents . 2. Provides safe and accurate Medication Related interventions to residents. a. Administers and documents medications and treatments according to each resident's medication schedule using current standards of medication pass technique . R701 A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) on 8/6/24 that alleged in part, on 7/31/24, R701's Family Member visited R701 from 7:32 PM until approximately 12:30 AM 8/1/24 and Registered Nurse (RN) B never came to R701's room to administer their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake # MI00144835. Based on interview and record the facility failed to ensure that one Nurse (Nurse A) had an active license to practice as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Failure to ensure Nursing Staff had a valid, active/current license had the potential to affect multiple residents at the facility. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged Nurse A was working at the facility with a suspended license. The complainant alleged when they viewed the State Licensing Verification website, it was noted Nurse A's license was suspended in February 2024. On 6/5/24 at approximately 8:00 AM, a review of the State Licensing Verification website was conducted. Nurse A 's information was entered into the Profession Licensing search for LPNs. The License Detail section indicated Nurse As license had been suspended on 2/3/24. Additional documentation included Disciplinary Actions that resulted in suspension to practice as an LPN with an effective date of 2/3/24. On 6/5/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, a review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish a comprehensive infection control program that identified resident infections, calculated monthly infection rates, tracked and trended infections, utilized laboratory and pharmaceutical data, and ensured departmental surveillance and staff education on infection control. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all 91 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 1:58 PM, a review of the facility provided infection control program was conducted. Registered Nurse (RN) J, who served as the Infection Preventionist (IP), explained she was hired in September 2023, and the facility had not had an IP when she was hired. The binder provided was reviewed and no resident specific data was documented for March 2023, April 2023, August 2023, November 2023 and December 2023. May 2023, June 2023 and July 2023 only contained line listings and a surveillance map. For September 2023, there was a printout listing all the residents on antibiotics and a document logging employee illnesses. October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-14 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently have an employed Infection Preventionist to properly assess, develop, implement, monitor and manage the Infection Control Program. This deficiency had the ability to affect all 91 residents that resided at the facility. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 1:58 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) J, who served as Infection Preventionist (IP), was interviewed and asked how long she had been at the facility. RN J explained she had started in early September 2023 to be the IP. RN J was asked if she had replaced someone already serving as IP. RN J explained there had not been an IP at the facility when she was hired. Review of RN J's certificate for Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course revealed it was dated 12/8/23. On 12/14/23 at 11:30 AM, Administrator A was interviewed and asked when the facility's last IP had left. Administrator A explained he believed it was in March 2023.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the nursing standards of practice for two Residents (R70 and R19) by not accurately transcribing the physician orders and not priming an insulin pen prior to administration resulting in a Resident receiving incorrect medication dose and the potential for receiving incorrect insulin doses. Findings include: R70 A record review of the facesheet revealed R70 was recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing and rehabilitation after a hospitalization. R70's admitting diagnoses included fractured right humerus, hypertension (high blood pressure), urinary retention, dementia, and metabolic encephalopathy (condition that affects how the brain functions). R70 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00/15 indicative of severe cognitive impairment based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. R70's preferred language was Chaldean. An initial observation was completed on 12/12/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure implementation of a pharmacy recommendation after the physician's agreement for one (R55) of five residents reviewed for Medication Regimen Review (MRR). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R55 was admitted into the facility on 5/5/21 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: stroke, diabetes and schizoaffective disorder. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R55 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of a Consultation Report by a Consultant Pharmacist dated 6/22/23 revealed a recommendation that read, Please consider increasing Novolog to 21 units with meals (to be held if patient does not eat). The physician response was marked with I accept the recommendation(s) above, please implement as written and signed by Dr. W on 7/28/23. Former Director of Nursing (DON) C had signed the form on 7/26/23, two days before Dr. W had signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to continuously implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included consistent implementation of protocols for appropriate antibiotic use for multiple resident at the facility, including R9, of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 1:58 PM, a review of the facility provided infection control program was conducted and revealed the following: January 2023, line listings and a surveillance map. February 2023, line listings and a surveillance map. March 2023, an Interdisciplinary Team surveillance paper. April 2023, nothing. May 2023, line listings and a surveillance map. June 2023, line listings and a surveillance map. July 2023, line listings and a surveillance map. August 2023, nothing. September 2023, a printout of all residents on antibiotics. There were no signs and symptoms, no laboratory or radiology reports, or documentation on if the antibiotic therapy meet McGeer's criteria or not. There was a log of employee illnesses. October 2023, a printout of all residents on antibiotics and a surveillance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a dining experience with dignity that promoted independence with eating for one of one Resident (R90) reviewed for dignity with potential for frustration, decreased nutrition intake, and weight loss. Findings include: A record review of the facesheet of R90 revealed they were a long-term resident of the facility. R90 was recently re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a recent hospitalization. R90's diagnoses included right Femur fracture due to a fall at the facility on 5/9/23, dementia, stroke, and hemiplegia. R90 had history of multiple falls since admission to the facility. R90 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5/15, indicative of severe cognitive impairment, based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. An initial observation was completed on 12/12/23, at approximately 11:30 AM. R90 was observed in their bed. R90 had a wheelchair parked on the left side of the bed, near the wardrobe.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake(s): MI00139772 and MI00141293. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not providing timely assistance from the commode chair after toileting for one (R107) of one resident reviewed for neglect, resulting in frustration and emotional distress. Findings include: A facility provided document titled Abuse Prohibition Policy with an effective date of 10/14/22 read in part, Each guest/resident shall be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and misappropriation of property . A complaint received by the State Agency read in part, Around 9 PM (R107 - name omitted) was placed on the toilet and was left for over an hour. (R107 - name omitted) called for help and although staff would stick their head in, no one would help her off the toilet EMS (Emergency Medical Services) arrived at the facility and got (R107- name omitted) off the toilet. (Name omitted) called the rehab facility informing staff (R107 name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely fingernail care for one (R9) of two resident's reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings include: On 12/12/23 at approximately 10:09 AM, R9 was observed lying in bed. The resident was contracted and yelling out in pain. Both hands were observed to have excessive long nails, approximately one third inch past the finger bed. The resident was asked if they liked their nails long and replied that they did not. On 12/13/23 at approximately 12:00 PM, R9 was again observed in bed. Their nails on both hands were still long. A review of R9's clinical record documented that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part: Alzheimer's Disease, dysphagia and repeated falls. A review of R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 (severely impaired cognition). Continued review of R9's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS): DPS #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow up timely with the physician for one of one Resident (R35) reviewed for physician orders, resulting in the potential for delay in treatment and further decline in health. Findings include: R35 R35 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R35's admitting diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, and urinary tract infection. R35 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15, based on the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicative of intact cognition. An initial observation was completed on 12/12/23, at approximately 11:45 AM. R35 was observed in their bed watching TV covered with blankets. During this observation an interview was completed. During the interview R35 reported that they were doing okay and that they were planning to stay long term at the facility, and they were completing paperwork. R35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00141293. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions, treatments, and assessments for two (R42 & R104) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R42 On 12/12/23 at 9:37 AM, R42 was observed lying in bed with an air mattress. R42 was lying on their back. The air mattress controller hooked on the end of the bed was not on, and R42's bottom appeared to be resting directly on the frame of the bed with the mattress enveloping R42 on either side. Upon inspection of the controller, labeled as an alternating pressure low air loss with patient sensing technology, the power cord was not plugged into the controller and was hanging down towards the floor. R42 was asked about the mattress, but did not reply to questions asked. Review of the clinical record revealed R42 was admitted into the facility on 1/12/22 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care and identify signs of a urinary tract infection (UTI) for one (R63) of one resident reviewed for UTIs. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 5:10 PM, R63 was observed lying in bed. A urinary catheter drainage bag was observed hanging from the side of the bed and contained viscous, opaque, green colored urine. R63 did not answer any questions when addressed and made groaning noises. A foul, sweet smelling odor was present in R63's room. On 12/13/23 at 7:48 AM, R63 was observed lying in bed. A foul, sweet smelling odor was present in R63's room. R63's urinary catheter drainage bag was observed to contain a small amount of viscous, opaque, green colored urine. There was a document present in R63's room that noted they were going out of the facility for a procedure that day. On 12/13/23 at 7:53 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN) 'H', R63's assigned nurse. When queried about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an attending physician was supervising medical care, participating in resident assessments and available for consultation for two (R55, R46) of three residents reviewed for physician services. Findings include: R55 On 12/12/23 at 1:05 PM, R55 was observed sitting on the bed. Another person was sitting in a chair in R55's room. R55 spoke with broken English, but could make themselves understood. The other person in the room explained they were R55's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA). R55's DPOA was asked about care in the facility. R55's DPOA explained R55's doctor, Dr. N had never once called them to discuss R55's medications or plan of care. They were concerned that R55 had dementia and a language barrier and could not communicate everything that was going on with the doctor. The only way they knew R55 had been seen by Dr. N was when they received a summary of charges from R55's insurance company and there was a charge for a physician visit.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely laboratory services as ordered by the physician to one (R100) of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. A record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for short-term skilled nursing and rehabilitation after recent hospitalization. R100's admitting diagnoses included sepsis, heart failure, and diabetes. R100 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicative of intact cognition. An initial observation was completed on 12/12/23, at approximately 9:55 AM. R100 was observed in their bed. During this observation an interview was conducted. During the interview R100 reported that they have been feeling tired for about ten days. R100 reported that they were receiving antibiotic medication once a day for the infection and had been waiting for their laboratory results. When queried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure radiology/x-ray services were obtained and addressed timely for two (R46 and R9) out of two residents reviewed for radiology services. Findings include: R46 On 12/12/23 at approximately 9:53 AM, R46 was observed in their room. The resident was alert and not able to answer questions pertaining to care provided by the facility. A review of R46's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to on 9/28/23 with diagnoses that included: diabetes type II and dementia. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4/15 (severely cognitively impaired). Continued review of R46's clinical record documented, in part, the following: Nurses Notes (9/25/23): MD (Medical Doctor) notified that resident O2 (oxygen) is 86%. Albuterol ordered and 2 liters of 02. Stat Chest x-ray ordered. Order Details (9/25/23): Order date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00137881 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to document care concerns and follow the facility's policy for concerns for one (R902) of one resident reviewed for grievances. Findings include: On 9/6/23 a concern submitted to the state agency was reviewed which alleged the facility administration was not following up on resident concerns. On 9/6/23 The medical record for R902 was reviewed and revealed the following: R902 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Progressive neuropathy, Low back pain and Pain in left knee. A review of R902's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 6/3/23 revealed R902 needed staff assistance with toileting and bathing. R902's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was 15 indicating intact cognition. On 9/6/23 at approximately 12:03 p.m., R902 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R902 was queried if they had any concerns about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00138181 and MI00138398 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration for two residents (R902 and R903) of two residents reviewed for Nursing standards of practice. Findings include: Resident #902 On 9/6/23 a concern submitted to the State Agency alleged R902 was not receiving their medications as ordered. On 9/6/23 at approximately 12:03 p.m., R902 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R902 was queried if they had any concerns about their care and they indicated that they have had episodes of where they were unable to get their pain medication because the facility had run out of it and the Nursing staff did not ensure it was in the facility. On 9/6/23 The medical record for R902 was reviewed and revealed the following: R902 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Progressive neuropathy, Low back pain and Pain in left knee. A review of R902's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00137881 and MI00134566. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure regular scheduled bathing was provided for one resident (R902) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: On 9/6/23 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R902 was not receiving regular bathing. On 9/6/23 at approximately 12:03 p.m., R902 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R902 was queried if they had any concerns about their care and they reported that the facility had been missing showers during the summer months. R902 reported that they are often left wet in their brief and needed to be showered regularly to prevent the urine from breaking down their skin. On 9/6/23 The medical record for R902 was reviewed and revealed the following: R902 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Progressive neuropathy, Low back pain and Pain in left knee. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI00134566 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure treatments for a wound were completed timely per Physicians orders and were appropriately assessed for one resident (R901) of one residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: On 9/6/23 a concern submitted to the State Agency for review alleged R901 did not receive appropriate wound care treatment. On 9/6/23 the medical record for R901 was reviewed and revealed the following: R901 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia and Heart Failure. A review of R901's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/7/22 revealed R901 needed extensive assistance from facility staff with their activities of daily living. R901's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was seven indicating severely impaired cognition. A review of R901's careplan revealed the following: [R901] has Actual impairment to skin integrity r/t…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-03-25 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information was accurately posted and updated for each shift. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to review the facility's current staffing levels.Findings include:On 03/23/2026 at approximately 8:33 a.m., upon entrance to the facility, a review of the displayed daily staffing posting was observed and the posting that was displayed was for 3/21/26 indicating it was approximately two days old and not reflecting the current census of the day (106) or any staffing changes of the active shift. On 03/25/2026 at approximately 1:59 p.m., during a conversation with Staffing Coordinator B (SC B), SC B was asked who was responsible for ensuring the Nurse staffing posting was accurate and up to date. SC B reported they were responsible for updating the staffing posting. SC B reported that when they leave the facility for the weekend, they will provide the following staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$167,213 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $59,163 — penalty dated 2025-05-14
- $51,948 — penalty dated 2025-01-16
- $26,072 — penalty dated 2024-11-18
- $30,030 — penalty dated 2024-01-31
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-11 for 13 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-07 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97 | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2013 |
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2013 |
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2013 |
| PALFFY, CARL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2013 |
| WILSON, FAREEDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/04/2024 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/24/2025 |
| SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/29/2013 |
| WEST BLOOMFIELD SENIOR LEASING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2013 |
| ZENITH FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235663. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.