No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Laurels Of West Columbus, The

441 Norton Road, Columbus, OH 43228 · For profit - Individual · 97 certified beds · (614) 812-1200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$17,345 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,345 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
990 Galloway Rd · (614) 851-9585 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1001 Norton Rd · (614) 853-3836 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.2 mi
620 Norton Rd · (614) 699-5530 · Call to confirm hours
Park
460 Branding Iron Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms27.9%30.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.7%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.4%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.0%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%12.9%12.0%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.6%CMS range 40.5–59.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.6–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.2–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.23
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
60.7%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 90.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-09)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, staff interview, Power of Attorney (POA) interview, closed medical record review, review of a facility submitted Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of hospital records and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #83, who had a diagnosis of dementia, had a previous elopement attempt from the facility, and had a Wanderguard (wearable bracelet that triggers alarms at the doors to alert when a resident attempts to exit) applied to his left ankle, did not elope from the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injury and/or death when on 08/03/25 Resident #83 was able to exit the facility through an unknown facility door and staff reported they did not hear the door alarms sound. Resident #83 was subsequently found lying in the local hospital parking lot,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly evaluate and monitor a pressure ulcer. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #3's pressure ulcer to her coccyx, which was not open, was not monitored and/or assessed, was not assessed by the wound physician, and was found to have opened on 11/26/22. Additionally, the facility failed to properly monitor and evaluate a pressure ulcer and ensure pressure reducing interventions were implemented timely for Resident #84. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #84 was found to have coccyx redness on 12/10/22 which was not monitored or assessed until 01/04/23 when the coccyx wound was determined to be a stage three pressure ulcer. Furthermore, Resident #84 was not provided timely pressure relieving interventions. This affected two residents (#3 and #84) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure bags of enteral nutrition product and water for tube feeding were labeled and dated appropriately for Residents #56 and #79. This affected two (#56 and #79) of two residents in the facility with active orders for tube feeding. The facility census was 79.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus, adult failure to thrive, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastrostomy status (a gastrostomy is a surgical opening in the abdominal wall, often for the use of a feeding tube). Further review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Additional review of Resident #56's medical record revealed physician orders for a nothing by mouth diet, with an enteral (tube) feeding order for Osmolite 1.2 to start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy regarding enhanced barrier precautions, the facility failed to ensure infection control protocols were followed during the use of a tube feeding device for Resident #56. This affected one (#56) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding infection control. The facility census was 79.Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus, adult failure to thrive, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastrostomy status (a gastrostomy is a surgical opening in the abdominal wall, often for the use of a feeding tube). Further review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Additional review of Resident #56's medical record revealed physician orders for a nothing by mouth diet, with an enteral (tube) feeding order for Osmolite 1.2 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident family interview, and review of self-reported incidents, the facility failed to conduct an investigation and report an allegation of potential neglect related to a resident elopement to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#94) of three residents reviewed for elopements. The census was 89.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 08/29/25. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had impaired cognition. The resident was assessed as independent for ambulation. Review of the nursing notes dated 09/05/25 at 3:26 P.M. revealed on that date, a staff member reported seeing a resident (#94) in her power wheelchair outside of a pizza restaurant down the street from the facility. Staff located the resident on [NAME] Road and escorted her back to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide residents and representatives with discharge summaries to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility. This affected one (#92) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The census was 89.Findings Include:Review of Resident #92's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #92's progress notes dated 09/27/25 revealed her son came to the facility and stated he wanted to take his mother home. The note revealed the nurse told her son he would need to sign against medical advice (AMA) documents prior to taking Resident #92 home. Further review revealed there was nothing else listed in the progress note about Resident #92 leaving the facility to go home. The note also revealed a nurse practitioner was made aware of the AMA decision. Review of Resident #92's progress note dated 09/28/25 revealed Resident #92 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments for care of spine incisions were completed as ordered. This affected one (#91) of three residents reviewed for treatments. The census was 89.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included infection and inflammatory reaction, fusion of the spine, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol dependence, atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, presence of coronary angioplasty implant and graft, hyperlipidemia, anemia, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, depression, cardiomyopathy, and other seizures. Review of Resident #91's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/19/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #91 After Visit Summary dated 09/17/25 revealed instructions to check his cervical spine incision daily for redness or drainage. Further review revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This effected one (#93) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 89.Findings include:Record review for Resident #93 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, orthostatic hypertension, and chronic heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #93 had intact cognition and was assessed to require self-care assistance.Review of physician orders for Resident #93 revealed medication orders including three furosemide (Lasix) 20 milligram (mg) oral tablets once daily, ordered on 09/27/25 and discontinued 09/30/25 for a diuretic. In addition, there was an order for one furosemide 80 mg oral tablet once daily, beginning 09/29/25 and discontinued 10/06/25.Review of the September 2025 medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary care and services so they could attend outside medical appointments. This affected two (#14, #81) of three residents reviewed for appointments. The census was 79. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/26/25. Medical diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of part of right bronchus lung, cancer, malnutrition, depression, and history of falling. Review of fax from the chemotherapy physician dated 07/31/25 revealed to draw these labs on 08/01/25 and every other Friday. The labs were B-12 Folate, Iron study with ferritin, Cortisol random, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) with reflex, free T-4, Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP), Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential, and Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Blood Test (ATCH). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding was provided as physician ordered. This affected one (#14) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding. The census was 79.Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/26/25. Medical diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of part of right bronchus lung, cancer, malnutrition, depression, and history of falling. Review of the care plan dated 04/26/25 revealed Resident #14 was unable to nutritionally consume adequate food or fluids by mouth. He required a tube feeding related to malnutrition and weight loss. Intervention was to administer tube feeding as ordered. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. His functional status was partial/moderate assistance for eating, dependent for toileting, substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility, and transfers were non-applicable. He was occasionally incontinent of bladder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were available from the pharmacy for administration. This affected one (#81) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 79. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed the resident had a recent admission date 07/23/25. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage two, irritable bowel syndrome, non-pressure chronic ulcer right calf with fat layer exposed, anxiety disorder, and overactive bladder. Review of plan of care dated 09/22/22 revealed that Resident #81 was at risk for discomfort or adverse side effects related to receiving diuretics therapy related to congestive heart failure. Inventions included administering medication as ordered, encouraging residents to drink fluids, observe possible side effects every shift, and observing and reporting to physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was completed as physician ordered. This affected one (#14) of three residents reviewed for laboratory testing. This census was 79. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/26/25. Medical diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of part of right bronchus lung, cancer, malnutrition, depression, and history of falling. Review of fax from the chemotherapy physician dated 07/31/25 revealed to draw these labs on 08/01/25 and every other Friday. The labs were B-12 Folate, Iron study with ferritin, Cortisol random, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) with reflex, free T-4, Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP), Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential, and Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Blood Test (ATCH). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. His functional status was partial/moderate assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately clean and disinfect a glucometer between resident use. The affected one (Resident #28) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility identified seven residents who received blood glucose monitoring utilizing the shared glucometer on A Hall. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 06/04/25 at 6:28 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #155 checked a blood sugar for Resident #33 and proceeded to prepare medications for Resident #28. Resident #28 also needed a blood sugar test prior to administering insulin. There was no observation of cleaning the glucometer and the same glucometer was used for both residents. Interview on 06/04/25 at 6:34 A.M. with LPN #155 confirmed the glucometer was not cleaned between Residents #33 and #29. LPN #155 stated the standard practice was to clean the medication cart, glucometer, and blood pressure cuff when done with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 12/20/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, depression, osteoarthritis and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had intact cognition. Resident #12 had limited functional range of motion noted on both sides for both upper and lower extremities and was staff dependent for personal hygiene needs. Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation in the task section of the medical record from 05/01/25 to 05/31/25 revealed Resident #12 was documented to have shower/bath/bed baths on 05/06/25, 05/14/25. 05/17/25, 05/20/25, and 05/24/25. It was documented no shower/bath/ bed bath was provided on 05/10/25 and 05/28/25 and refused on 05/31/25. Interview on 06/03/25 at 10:56 A.M. with Resident #12 stated she has never refused her shower; the aides tell her there were no Hoyer lift pads available to get her up onto the shower bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent Resident #76's controlled substances from being misappropriated. This affected one (#76) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 04/28/25 and a discharge date of 05/16/25. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of anus, depression, neoplasm related pain, depression, insomnia, and osteoarthritis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 had intact cognition. Review of the facilities SRI dated 04/24/25 revealed on 04/24/25, a nurse reported the narcotics were missing for Resident #76. The nurse went to dispense the medications, and they were unavailable. The nurse reported the concern to the Director of Nursing (DON). The pharmacy was asked to provide proof of delivery, and they sent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the use of antipsychotic medication was based on a clinically supported diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #81) of five residents reviewed for antipsychotics. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 04/25/25. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, and nicotine dependence. Review of the physician orders dated 04/26/25 revealed Venlafaxine HCL extended release 150 milligrams (mg) to be administered once daily for depression. The physician order dated 04/30/25 revealed Quetiapine Fumarate 200 mg at bedtime for depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact and had no symptoms of depression. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 06/05/25 at 1:40 P.M. confirmed Resident #81 does not have a current diagnosis of depression in the medical record and there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, policy review, and review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI), the facility failed to thoroughly investigate Resident #76's missing controlled substances. This affected one (#76) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 04/28/25 and a discharge date of 05/16/25. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of anus, depression, neoplasm related pain, depression, insomnia, and osteoarthritis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #76 had intact cognition. Review of the facilities SRI dated 04/24/25 revealed on 04/24/25, a nurse reported the narcotics were missing for Resident #76. The nurse went to dispense the medications, and they were unavailable. The nurse reported the concern to the Director of Nursing (DON). The pharmacy was asked to provide proof of delivery, and they sent the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #28 had a care plan for a diuretic and Resident #81 had a care plan for smoking. This affected one resident (#28) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and one resident (#81) of one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 12/14/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #28's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had intact cognition. Review of Resident #28's physician order dated 04/23/25 revealed an order for Furosemide (a diuretic) 20 milligrams, one tablet by mouth twice a day. Review of Resident #28's plan of care revealed it did not address his diuretic use. Interview on 06/04/25 at 3:20 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the care plan did not address his diuretic use. 2. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) received timely and adequate staff assistance with showers and personal hygiene. This affected one (Resident #53) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility identified 24 residents who were dependent on staff for bathing. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 04/24/25. Diagnoses included left knee effusion, depression, anxiety disorder, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the care plan dated 04/24/25 revealed Resident #53 has a functional ability deficit and required assistance with self-care and mobility related to altered mobility. Interventions revealed the resident prefers baths at 10:30 A.M., was dependent on staff for bathing, and required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene, including shaving. Review of the facility's hygiene guest preferences form dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review for Resident #26 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included non-chronic pressure ulcer of the left heel, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and depressive disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition. Review of the Wound Care Clinic visit note dated 04/28/25 revealed Resident #26 was to have a follow up appointment with the clinic in one week. There was no evidence in Resident #26's medical record that Resident #26 attended an appointment at the Wound Care Clinic one week after his appointment on 04/28/25. Interview with Resident #26 on 06/05/25 at 11:02 A.M. confirmed they attended appointments at the Wound Care Clinic on Mondays and had missed an appointment on 05/05/25 due to the facility not scheduling transportation to the appointment. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/05/25 at 2:41 P.M. confirmed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #28 who had a history of falls and failed to document, communicate and follow up on Resident #252's fall. This affected two (Residents #28 and #252) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 12/14/21 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy and epilepsy. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 06/09/21 revealed Resident #28 was at risk for fall related injury and falls related to cerebral palsy, decreased mobility, opioid pain medication use, and psychotropic medication use. Interventions included perimeter mattress to bed, encourage resident to ask for assistance with transfers, visual cue to ask for help with transfers in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained for new admissions and as ordered by the physician for residents identified as nutritionally at risk. This affected one (Resident #81) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 04/25/25. Diagnoses included spinal fusion, malignant neoplasm of the cervix, lung, vertebrae, and bone, bacteremia, and acute kidney failure. Review of the initial nutritional evaluation dated 04/29/25 revealed a diet order for a regular diet with oral intake between 75-100%, and no reported chewing or swallowing concerns. No acute nutritional diagnoses were documented at that time. The evaluation recommended monitoring weights. Review of the care plan dated 04/29/25 revealed Resident #81 was at nutritional and/or dehydration risk due to cancer, corticosteriod use, and an obese body mass index. Interventions included encouraging choices within the ordered diet, offering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the treatment in accordance with physician orders and professional standards for pain management. This affected three (Residents #23, #28, and #137) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 12/14/21. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and epilepsy. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #28's physician order dated 12/19/24 revealed an order for Acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg) three tablets by mouth every six hours as needed for pain. Non-pharmacological interventions were listed. Review of the plan of care dated 04/03/25 revealed Resident #28 was at risk for pain and/or had acute/chronic pain related to chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to timely respond to pharmacy recommendations, failed to provide rationale for declining pharmacy recommendations, and failed to follow through with the pharmacy recommendations and the physician accepting the pharmacy recommendation. This affected three (Residents #14, #23, and #28) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 12/14/21 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, type two diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #28's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had intact cognition. Review of Resident #28's pharmacy recommendation dated 06/25/24 revealed the resident received two or more antipsychotics and the pharmacist recommended considering a gradual dose reduction (GDR). There was no evidence the physician addressed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, facility policy review, Medscape guidance, and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). The facility had two medication errors out of 36 opportunities for an error rate of 5.56%. This affected one (Resident #28) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 12/14/21. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition and received insulin medication. Review of the physician orders for Resident #28 revealed an order dated 12/29/24 for Insulin Lispro inject 30 units subcutaneously before meals and an order dated 12/17/24 for Admelog injection (Insulin Lispro) sliding scale coverage. Resident #28 had an additional order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1b. Review of Resident #28's physician reorder dated 03/27/25 revealed an order for Glipizide extended release 20 milligrams (mg) one time a day for diabetes mellitus. This was to be taken 30 minutes before meals. The physician order dated 05/13/25 revealed an order for Ziprasidone 80 mg one capsule by mouth twice a day for bipolar disorder. This was to be taken with meals. Review of Resident #28's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May and June 2025 revealed the resident's Ziprasidone was scheduled for 6:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. and Glipizide was scheduled for 9:00 A.M. Additionally, Resident #28 was not given Ziprasidone on multiple occasions including the evening dose on 05/02/25, 05/13/25, and 05/27/25. He missed the morning dose of 05/03/25 and 05/14/25. Interview on 06/04/25 at 8:25 A.M. and 06/04/25 at 2:54 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #28's Glipizide and Ziprasidone were not scheduled at appropriate times. She reported Ziprasidone was in the facility and she was unsure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for laboratory work were completed in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #252) of two residents reviewed for laboratory work. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #252 revealed an admission date of 05/15/25. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and encephalopathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #252 had intact cognition. Review of the physician progress note dated 05/30/25 revealed the physician was notified that Resident #252 made an attempt to bite nursing. The physician planned to obtain a complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), Vitamin D level, Vitamin B12, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Review of the physician orders dated 05/30/25 revealed orders for CBC, CMP, Vitamin D level, Vitamin B12, BNP, and urinalysis with culture and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents received timely follow-up for missing dentures. This affected two (Residents #30 and #51) of three residents reviewed for dental concerns. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 05/02/22. Diagnoses included stroke, non-Alzheimer's dementia, malnutrition, anxiety, and depression. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact and did not exhibit behaviors during the review period. Resident #30 was able to feed self independently, required staff maximal assistance with oral hygiene. Resident #30 was on a mechanical soft diet and had no natural teeth or fragments. Review of Resident #30's plan of care revealed an intervention initiated on 08/16/24 to provide dental consults as needed and to provide diet as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were documented in the medical record as administered to the resident and failed to ensure dressing changes and pressure-reducing interventions were documented in the medical record. This affected two (Residents #51 and #137) of 21 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #137 revealed an admission date of 05/30/25. On 05/31/25, Resident #137 left the facility the against medical advice. Diagnoses including fifth metacarpal bone displaced fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute respiratory failure. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #137 had recently been admitted after an open heart surgery with a surgical incision to her sternum. Review of the physician orders dated 05/30/25 revealed an order for Acetaminophen extra strength oral tablet 500 milligrams (mg)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility investigation review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation in regard to a resident's injury of unknown origin. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents investigations reviewed. The census was 88. Findings Include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were displaced bicondylar fracture of left tibia, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, Type II Diabetes, atrial fibrillation, ischemic cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, anemia, insomnia, hypothyroidism, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and personal history of trans ischemic attack (TIA). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #44's progress note, dated 03/15/25, revealed Resident #44 complained of pain in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to the residents without significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included surgical aftercare following surgery of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, fournier gangrene, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #15's medication administration record (MAR) for March 2025 revealed an order dated 03/12/25 for Cefepime (antibiotic) HCL solution, one gram/50 milliliters, use one gram IV every six hours for MDRO (multi-drug resistant organisms) for 14 days. The administration times were 12:00 A.M., 6:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., and 6:00 P.M. On 03/26/25, the 12:00 P.M. dose was documented as administered by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, record review, review of facility self-reported incident and investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of the resident's controlled substances. This affected two (Residents #67 and #83) of 12 residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility identified 45 residents who had orders for controlled substances. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/23/24. Diagnoses included Huntington's disease, chorea (a type of dyskinesia characterized by rapid, jerky, and involuntary body movements) and anxiety. Resident #83 has received hospice care since admission to the facility. Review of Resident #83's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/30/24, revealed Resident #83 was cognitively intact. Resident #83 had no reported behaviors or rejection of care. Review of Resident #83's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/30/24 for Lorazepam (used to decrease anxiety and a controlled substance) oral solution two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, record review, review of facility self-reported incidents and investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed following a substantiated instance of staff to resident misappropriation of controlled substances. This affected two (Residents #67 and #83) of 12 resident records reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI) tracking number 252230, initiated 09/24/24, revealed on 09/23/24 the Director of Nursing (DON) returned to the facility due to the behavior of a floor nurse, Registered Nurse (RN) #399. A urine screen was completed on-site with the nurse's verbal consent and was positive for cocaine, benzodiazepines, and opioids. Following RN #399's removal from the building, a narcotic count was completed on RN #399's assigned medication cart and it was determined multiple controlled medications were missing for Residents #83 and #67. An investigation was initiated. The local police…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and family interview, record review, and facility procedure review, the facility failed to implement post-operative drain care for one (Resident #89) of three residents reviewed for drain care. The facility identified two residents with post-operative drains. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 08/28/24. Medical diagnoses included cholangiocarcinoma (cancer of the bile ducts), surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, and bacteremia. Resident #89 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 09/12/24. Resident #89 discharged from the facility on 09/26/24. Review of Resident #89's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/19/24, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #89 was recorded as receiving surgical wound care. Review of Resident #89's hospital After Visit Summary (AVS), dated 08/28/24, revealed the resident admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, review of facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were safely transferred, falls were documented in the facility's incident and accident log and resident medical record, and the facility completed thorough fall investigations to determine the root cause analysis. This affected two (Resident #47 and #72) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 04/20/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, respiratory failure with hypoxia, vascular disease, muscle weakness, and contracture of the left hand. Review of the progress note dated 08/12/24 revealed a stated tested nursing assistant (STNA) notified the nurse that Resident #47 was lowered to the floor by staff. The STNA stated the resident was being transferred from bed to wheelchair when the resident started to shuffle feet and was lowered to the floor. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide suprapubic catheter site care as ordered for Resident #46. This affected one (Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility identified 12 residents who had indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/29/23. Medical diagnoses included short bowel syndrome without colon, ileostomy status, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Resident #46 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/10/24 at a local hospital for a urinary tract infection and diarrhea in the presence of an ileostomy. Resident #46 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #46's care plan, dated 06/16/23, revealed the resident was at risk for urinary tract infections and catheter-related trauma, and had an indwelling suprapubic catheter. Listed interventions included to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and facility procedure review, the facility failed to transcribe physician's orders for and provide intravenous site care for Resident #46's central venous access upon her hospital return. This affected one (Resident #46) of three resident records reviewed for intravenous access devices. The facility only identified one resident with intravenous access. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/29/23. Medical diagnoses included short bowel syndrome without colon, ileostomy status, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Resident #46 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/10/24 at a local hospital for a urinary tract infection and diarrhea in the presence of an ileostomy. Resident #46 re-admitted ot the facility on 10/10/24. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 08/22/24, revealed Resident #46 had intact cognition. Resident #46…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure records of controlled medications were properly maintained. This affected two (Resident #83 and #88) of 12 residents whose records were reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified 45 residents with orders for controlled medications. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/23/24. Medical diagnoses included Huntington's Disease, chorea (a type of dyskinesia characterized by rapid, jerky, and involuntary body movements), epilepsy, and anxiety. Resident #83 has received hospice care since admission to the facility. Review of Resident #83's physician's orders revealed an order dated 08/30/24 for Lorazepam (a benzodiazepine used to decrease anxiety, controlled substance) oral solution 2 milligrams (mg) per milliliter (ml), give 0.75 ml (1.5 mg) by mouth four times daily for anxiety. Resident #80 also had an order dated 08/23/24 for Morphine Sulfate (opioid analgesic, controlled substance) oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #46) of 12 residents' records reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/29/23. Medical diagnoses included short bowel syndrome without colon, ileostomy status, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Resident #46 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/10/24 at a local hospital for a urinary tract infection and diarrhea in the presence of an ileostomy. Resident #46 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 08/22/24, revealed Resident #46 had intact cognition. Resident #46 had no recorded behaviors or rejection of care. Review of Resident #46's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #46 was treated in the hospital for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was maintained as an accurate depiction of resident care. This affected one (Resident #88) of 12 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 85. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #88 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and discharge date of [DATE] (death). Review of the physician orders dated [DATE] revealed an order for Morphine Sulfate Solution 10 milligram (mg) per 6.0 milliliter (ml) with instructions to give 0.25 ml by mouth every two hours as needed (PRN) for pain. Resident #88 was receiving hospice services. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 09/2024 revealed on the day of his death ([DATE]), Resident #88 received Morphine PRN dose one time at 11:22 A.M. Review of the narcotic sheet for Morphine PRN revealed the only entry from the date of death ([DATE]) was documented at 1:00 P.M. Review of the progress notes dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized for residents who required enhanced-barrier precautions (EBP) for open wounds. This affected two (Residents #39 and #41) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified 23 residents with open wounds. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 03/11/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and vascular dementia. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 07/02/24, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #39 was at risk for skin breakdown but was noted upon assessment to have no unhealed pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #39's care plan, dated 10/16/24, revealed the resident has an actual impairment to skin integrity related to pressure injury. Resident #39 was listed as having a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to medications were not left unattended and unsecured. This had the ability to affect all 21 residents (#2, #10, #12, #15, #16, #20, #22, #23, #24, #25, #36, #41, #42, #46, #49, #58, #62, #66, #70, #73, #192) who resided on the 200 to 212 hall. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Observation on 02/01/23 at 4:10 P.M. revealed a sleeve of medications left unsecured on the top of the medication cart while the nurse was in another room and the medication cart was not in view. The sleeve of medications contained 30 Tamsulosin (medication used to treat symptoms of an enlarged prostate) tablets and was laying unsecured on top of the medication cart. Interview with the Unit Manager License Practical Nurse #110 on 02/01/23 at 4:10 P.M. confirmed the medications were left unattended and unsecured on top of the medication cart. Review of the facility policy titled Medication/Treatment Cart Use, dated 09/07/22, revealed no medications are kept on top of the cart. The cart must be clearly visible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure walls were in good repair in resident rooms. This had the potential to affect all eight (#7, #10, #22, #31, #41, #44, #45, and #50) residents who resided in rooms #201, #203, #211, #215, #216, #220, #222, and #224. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Observations on 01/30/23 at 11:00 A.M., on 01/31/23 at 10:00 A.M., on 02/01/23 at 3:30 P.M., revealed damaged walls with exposed dry wall behind resident beds and upon entering resident rooms #201, #203, #211, #215, #216, #220, #222, and #224. Interview with the Maintenance Director #123 on 02/02/23 at 10:30 A.M. confirmed the dry wall in rooms #201, #203, #211, #215, #216, #220, #222, and #224 were in need of repair. Review of the facility policy titled, Maintenance Department dated 08/17/21, revealed the department will do on-going monitoring of the facility for areas needing repair and, if needed, will report to the supervisor for approval of the repairs needed.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter collection bags were contained in a privacy bag to maintain dignity. This affected two (#5 and #75) of two residents reviewed for catheters. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents were dressed in a dignified manner. This affected one (#21) resident out of one resident reviewed for appropriate clothing. The census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an initial admission date of 05/19/21 with a latest readmission date of 01/28/23. Resident #5's diagnoses included severe morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/22, revealed the resident had clear speech, understood others, made herself understood and had no cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated Resident #5 required extensive assistance with toileting. Review of the nursing comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident advanced directives form was signed by the physician. This affected one (#21) out of two residents reviewed for advance directives. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an initial admission date of 12/24/22 with diagnoses incuding but not limited to Parkinson's disease, adult failure to thrive, and depression. Review of Resident #21's comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/31/22, revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. Review of Resident #21's plan of care revealed no care plan addressing the resident's do not resuscitate comfort care (DNRCC) status. Review of Resident #21's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/03/23 for Resident #21 to be a DNRCC. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed there was no evidence of a DNRCC form signed by the resident's physician. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #111 on 01/31/23 at 4:07 P.M., verified Resident #21 did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident indwelling urinary catheter was discontinued/removed as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#5) out of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an initial admission date of 05/19/21 with a latest readmission date of 01/28/23. Resident #5's diagnoses included but were not limited to fracture around internal prosthetic right knee joint, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/22, revealed Resident #5 had clear speech, understood others, made herself understood and had no cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated Resident #5 required extensive assistance with toileting. Review of Resident #5's nursing comprehensive evaluation, dated 01/07/23, revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #5's physician orders for February…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor resident pain levels and document the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for pain. This affected one resident (#84) out of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #84 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to severe protein-calorie malnutrition, cerebral infarction, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #84's plan of care, dated 12/16/22, revealed Resident #84 was at risk for pain or had pain related to constipation and gastro esophageal reflux disease. Resident #84 reported zero out of ten was an acceptable pain level. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, anticipating residents need for pain relief as needed and respond immediately to any complaint of pain, evaluating characteristics of pain on a scale of zero to ten, and evaluate for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of Medscape, the facility failed to ensure resident medications had appopriate indications for use and were monitored appropriately. This affected two residents (#40 and #84) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 02/08/21 with diagnoses which included but was not limited to unspecified dementia without disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #40's most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/11/22, revealed Resident #40 was cognitively impaired with poor memory recall. Review of Resident #40's physician orders revealed Resident #40 had an order dated 07/19/22 for Depakote (an anticonvulsant medication) twice a day for a documented diagnosis of dementia. Interview on 02/01/23 at 12:27 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of prescribing information from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the facility failed to ensure an there was an appropriate diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medications. This affected one (#84) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 01/06/23, revealed Resident #84 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #84's physician order, dated 01/20/23, revealed an order for Olanzapine (Zyprexa) tablet five milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth two times a day for dementia and behaviors. Review of Resident #84's physician order, dated 01/27/23, revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #84's tube feeding and water flushes were documented accurately. This affected one resident (#84) out of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed the resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to severe protein-calorie malnutrition, metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, Alzheimer's disease, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/06/23, revealed Resident #84 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #84 was 65 inches tall and weighed 170 pounds. Resident #84 had gained weight and was not on a physician prescribed weight gain regimen. Review of the physician order, dated 12/06/22, revealed Resident #84 had an order for Osmolite 1.2 (a tube feeding formula) to be administered at 80 milliliters (ml) every hour for 20 hours or until 1600 ml had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of medical record reviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the resident's discharges from the facility. This affected two (#84 and #85) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/05/25 with discharge date of 03/14/25. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #84's progress notes revealed she went to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. There was no evidence in the medical record the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified for Resident #84's discharge to the hospital. Interview on 06/04/25 at 10:45 A.M. with the Administrator verified the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was not notified of Resident #84's discharge. 2. Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KHAN, ANISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2021
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/25/2021
LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2021
JOHNSTON, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
WILLIAMS, ELIJAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/17/2025
STOBB, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$561K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 20%Medicare 13%Other / private 67%

This home reported $561K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$363per resident / day
operating cost
$11,044per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366481. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next