Regency at Waterford
1901 N Telegraph Rd, Waterford, MI 48328 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (248) 836-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.8% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.3% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.2% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.5% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.6% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.7% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.9% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.6% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.44 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.5%CMS range 32.5–55.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.8–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 29.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.8%CMS range 6.4–14.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.74 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 124.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint # 2788554Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred in a facility contracted transportation vehicle for one (R701) out of two residents reviewed for accidents/transportation, resulting in R701 sustaining a C6 fracture (broken bone in the sixth cervical vertebra), a C7 compression fracture (structural collapse or break in the seventh cervical vertebra), hospitalization and pain. Findings include:A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R701, who is bedridden, was being transported to the hospital for a routine checkup and upon return to the facility their wheelchair was not secured properly. The wheelchair flipped over in the transfer van causing a neck injury and hospitalizationA review of R701's hospital records revealed the following: (Hospital).(R701).History and Physical Reports.Service date: 12/18/2025.Chief Complaint: states she was in a W/C (wheelchair) and the driver took a turn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s 2699473, 2699484, and 2699520.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Doctor, Nurse Practitioner, or Physician's assistant of an acute change of condition and ensure a timely transfer to the emergency room (ER) for one resident (R202), of two residents reviewed for an acute change of condition, resulting in R202 not being transferred to the emergency room timely, deemed not a candidate for surgical intervention, and ultimately death from sepsis. Findings include:A complaint received by the State Agency alleged the resident was not appropriately treated for an acute change of condition.On [DATE] at 2:15 PM a phone call was conducted with the complainant. They said R202 admitted to the facility on [DATE] in the afternoon. On the evening of [DATE] they said R202 developed, extreme pain in their abdomen with nausea and vomiting. They said they requested an evaluation from a physician on [DATE] during the evening and was told someone would be in on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-07-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary interventions were implemented in a timely manner and appropriate dietary monitoring and follow-up were provided for one resident (R89) of four residents reviewed for nutrition, resulting in R89 experiencing severe weight loss (greater than 5% in a month) On 7/25/23 at approximately 10:25 a.m., R89 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R89 appeared to be frail/thin. On 7/25/23 the medical record for R89 was reviewed and revealed the following: R89 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Disease of salivary gland, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis affecting left side, Cerebral infection. A review of R89's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/17/23 revealed R89 needed extensive assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R89's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was nine indicating moderately impaired cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2577773.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy of medical information was maintained for a one (R201) of two residents reviewed for Protected Health Information (PHI). Findings include:A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that read in part, .an employee of the facility was telling the diagnosis and personal business of the resident to other family members.Review of the clinical record revealed R201 was admitted into the facility on 8/7/20 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease, heart disease and history of lung cancer. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R201 had a staff assessment that indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of a documented titled, Statement of Capacity revealed an X marking To be incapable and unable to make his/her informed medical decisions. The document had two physician/psychologist signatures dated 11/20/24.On 9/9/25 at 4:19 PM, R201's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in foodborne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/20/25 at 8:48 AM, an observation of the main kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM 'O'). The following items were observed: The kitchen flooring was observed to have scattered debris throughout the kitchen including wrappers, used gloves, and food debris near the handwash sink, ice machine, juice machines, and behind the oven. The flooring behind the steamer was observed with various debris, including used gloves. A pull-out drawer on a table next to the meal prep area contained various cooking utensils. The drawer was not closed completely and remained slightly opened. Upon fully opening the drawer, the inside of the drawer and several utensils were observed with a thick layer of dust and various food debris. CDM 'O' reported they didn't use that very often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies related to implementation of their abuse policy for obtaining a complete background check for newly hired staff (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA 'X'), resulting in continued deficient practice. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: An abbreviated survey was conducted on 4/10/25 with deficiencies identified for abuse policy implementation. A request to accept evidence of deficiency correction in lieu of a revisit was accepted. According to a CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) 2567 form dated 4/10/25, the facility was found to be noncompliant with regulatory requirements related to abuse policy implementation. Review of the facility's Plan of Correction (POC) alleged a compliance date of 5/8/25. The facility's POC documented the facility would do the following to correct the deficient practice related to the failure to implement the abuse policy that requires a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive infection control program and ensure adherence to Center For Disease guidance for infection control practices regarding transmission based precautions and hand hygiene for seven residents, (R#'s 90, 125, 51, 234, 29, 84, and 11) of fourteen residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Infection Control Program On On 5/22/25 at 10:36 AM, a review of the facility's Infection Control Program was conducted and revealed the following: The February 2025 data did not contain a monthly summary of the program, a calculated infection rate, line listings with infection types, symptoms, antibiotics prescribed, mapping for trends and outbreaks, pharmacy reports, lab reports, environmental surveillance, or any education on infection control completed during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in the presence of flies and gnats throughout the facility, including the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: According to the 2017 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code section 6-501.111 Controlling Pests, The PREMISES shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the PREMISES by: .4. (D) Eliminating harborage conditions. According to the facility's policy titled Pest Control dated 3/5/2025: .There will be emphasis on the pest control program in kitchens, cafeterias, laundries, central sterile supply, loading docks, construction activities, and other areas prone to infestation. Monitoring of the environment will be done by the facility's staff. Pest control problems will be reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
R16 On 5/22/25 at 8:30 AM, upon entering the 600 hall, R16 was observed seated in a wheelchair in the hallway positioned next to two Nurses that were standing next to the medication cart. The Nurses were heard discussing R16's soiled pants and need to be changed. One of the Nurses proceeded to yell down the hallway very loudly, Do you know who his aide is?. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed seated behind the nursing station approximately 50 feet away and was observed to yell loudly back to this Nurse, Who (name of R16)?. On 5/22/25 at 11:27 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON was informed of concerns reported during the resident council meeting regarding whether they felt staff treated them with dignity and respect. The DON was informed of the earlier observation of the nursing staff yelling loudly throughout the hallway and they reported that should not have occurred and would initiate in-service education immediately. According to the facility's policy titled Federal & State - Resident Rights & Facility Responsibilities dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed to demonstrate evidence of follow-up and resolution to resident group concerns related to water pass, follow-up on lost/damaged clothes and personal laundry process for four of eight residents that participated in the confidential resident group interview, resulting in ongoing concerns and dissatisfaction with levels of service and feelings of frustration. Findings include: A confidential Resident Council meeting on 5/21/24 at 11 AM was held with eight anonymous residents. During the meeting, four of eight residents expressed concerns with the facility's personal laundry process and how they did not get their clothes back timely and they got lost and or damaged during the laundry process. When queried if they had discussed the concerns in their prior meetings, all four residents reported that they had brought this during the meetings and they stated yes. Anonymous Resident (AR) A reported that they had been missing 4-night gowns that were sent to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R284 On 5/20/25 at 9:43 AM, R284 was observed sitting on their bed. R284 was asked about care at the facility. R284 explained they did not sleep well because the staff were talking and laughing loudly in the hallway at night. Review of the clinical record revealed R284 was admitted into the facility on 5/15/25 with diagnoses that included: congestive heart failure, end stage renal disease and pulmonary hypertension. According to a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam dated 5/16/25, R284 was cognitively intact. On 5/21/25 at 9:35 AM, R284 was observed lying in bed. R284's door was closed, and staff could be heard talking in the hallway. R284 explained the staff at night were much louder than what could be heard presently, and it kept them awake. Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment with unkempt common/resident areas/hallways and failed to maintain comfortable sound levels in resident areas. This deficient practice had the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy that requires complete background checks for newly hired staff for one (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA 'X') of five staff members reviewed for criminal background checks. Findings include: A review of CNA 'X's employee files was completed to ensure the facility completed the appropriate criminal background screening upon hire which was 1/21/25. (The facility had been out of compliance with this regulation during an abbreviated survey on 4/10/25 with an alleged compliance date of 5/8/25.) Review of their personnel file revealed a fingerprint-based criminal history check dated 7/13/18. There was no documentation that this had been completed upon their employment on 1/21/25. Further review of the MICHIGAN WORKFORCE BACKGROUND CHECK CONSENT AND DISCLOSURE dated 1-17-2025 documented the Facility Name as [facility name redacted for another nursing facility not under same ownership]. The section of this document which prompts the employee to complete by initialing and dating was left blank for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice. Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Physician orders for blood pressure monitoring and administration of medication based on ordered parameters for one resident (R11) of two reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed R11 was admitted to the facility requiring long term services on 5/3/24 and had a medical history including heart disease and hypotension (low blood pressure). R11's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 assessed on 5/13/25. On 5/21/25 at 8:47 AM, a medication observation was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Q for R11. LPN Q was observed taking the blood pressure and resulted at 122/77 and was observed providing Midodrine (medication to treat low blood pressure). On 5/21/25 at 1:44 PM, a record review was conducted to reconcile R11's medication administration. The Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a splint/ positioning device (palm protectors) and range of motion were implemented for one (R49) of two residents with hand contractures (hardening of the muscles, tendons, and other soft tissues) reviewed for positioning and range of motion(ROM) resulting in the potential for contracture progression, pain, and further decline in range of motion with compromised skin integrity. Findings include: R49 Record review revealed R49 was a long-term resident of the facility. R49 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R49 was recently admitted to hospital on [DATE] with pneumonia and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R49's admitting diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing), anemia, dementia, and heart failure. R49 also had a stage 3 pressure ulcer (Merck manual defines a stage 3 pressure ulcer as a full-thickness skin loss with damage to subcutaneous/fat tissue extending down to [but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document resident falls in the clinical record, thoroughly investigate the root cause analysis of falls, and immediately implement appropriate interventions after falls for one resident (R63) of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the potential for additional avoidable falls. Findings include: On 5/20/25 at 11:36 AM, R63 was observed asleep and snoring in their dialysis chair at the nursing station. At that time, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 'AA' was asked why R63 was not taken back to their room to sleep in their chair and they said they kept them up at the nursing station because they were a fall risk. A review of R63's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: stroke, dysphagia, end stage renal disease with dependence on dialysis, atrial fibrillation, depression, diabetes, heart failure, adjustment disorder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure freedom from unnecessary antibiotic therapy for five residents, (R#'s 92, 16, 6, 20, and 91) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary antibiotic use, resulting in the potential for the development of antimicrobial resistance. Findings include: On 5/22/25 at 10:45 AM, a review of the facility's infection control program for the month of March was conducted and revealed the following: R92's facility acquired infection type on the line listing was documented as, Unknown. The line listing did not indicate any signs and symptoms for an infection or any lab results obtained and further documented they had been put on an antibiotic. A progress note in the record dated 3/20/25 read, .resident started on ABT (antibiotics) .no fever. continue having hematuria . R16's facility acquired infection on the monthly line listing documented they had a urinary tract infection. The only documented sign and symptom was, Dark urine, and there was no evidence of urinalysis/culture and sensitivity lab. The report further indicated R16…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. Four medication errors were observed from a total of 26 opportunities for three (R11, R120, R124) out of four residents reviewed during medication administration, resulting in an error rate of 15.38%. Findings include: R11 On 5/21/25 at 8:47 AM, a medication observation was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Q for R11 and was observed providing Midodrine 10 milligram (mg) (medication to treat low blood pressure). LPN Qwas ordered to give one tablet by mouth with meals for hypotension hold if Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) >105. LPN Q administered this medication with R11's SBP of 122. LPN Q was observed instilling four drops into the right eye and two drops into left eye. The order is to instill Artificial tears Ophthalmic Solution one drop in both eyes two times a day for dry eyes. On 5/22/25 at 10:31 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) and acknowledged LPN L should have given the correct medication as ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for four of eight medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 5/21/24 at 9:02 AM, an observation of the [NAME] Unit #1 Medication Cart was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Q. The following medications were observed throughout the cart unpackaged and without patient identifiers: A plastic cup was observed in drawer #4 containing a clear liquid, and a plastic spoon. LPN Q said it was MiraLAX, (laxative solution medication) for another resident and they kept it in there to give it time for it to dissolve. Three Styrofoam cups were observed dented, dirty, with debris at the bottom of each cup. One cup observed storing two loose double AA batteries amongst three packaged antibiotic ointment and packaged syringes. Second Styrofoam cup observed storing a small black flashlight with two packaged Biofreeze (topical analgesic) and three packaged antibiotic ointment packages. Third…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure meals were maintained and served at a palatable temperature affecting multiple residents, including R284, and three of eight residents from the confidential group interview, resulting in dissatisfaction with meals and the potential for nutritional decline. Findings include: It should be noted that the facility was recently found to be out of compliance with this regulation during an abbreviated survey conducted on 4/10/25 with an alleged compliance date of 5/8/25. On 5/20/25 at 9:43 AM, R284 was observed sitting on their bed. R284 was asked about food at the facility. R284 explained the food was always brought to them cold and they would have to get it reheated, or eat it cold. On 5/20/25 from 11:45 AM-12:43 PM, an observation was conducted of the lunch meal. During this time, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM 'O') was requested to prepare an additional meal tray with the main meal (Chicken Ala King) to include with the last food cart. At 12:43 PM, the last food cart was observed taken from the kitchen to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to operationalize an antibiotic stewardship program which consistently ensured appropriate clinical indication for us of antibiotic medications. This deficient practice affected multiple residents at the facility when residents who were deemed as not meeting criteria were prescribed on antibiotic therapy, resulting in the potential for increased antibiotic resistance. Findings include: Review of the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes dated 2015, documented in part, .Improving the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance is a national priority. Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use .Antibiotics are among the most frequently prescribed medications in nursing homes, with up to 70% of residents in a nursing home receiving one or more courses of systemic antibiotics when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessment and a physician's order for self administration of medications for one resident, (R46), of one resident resident reviewed for self-administration, resulting in the potential for inappropriate medication administration. Findings include: On 5/20/25 at 09:33 AM, R46 was observed lying in their bed. An interview was attempted, however R46 did not verbally respond to the attempt. At that time, a medication cup with a clear liquid was observed present on the bedside table. R46 was observed to take a small sip from the cup and place it back on the bedside table. On 5/20/25 at 9:35 AM, a review of R46's physician's orders and medication administration record (MAR) was conducted and revealed they received lactulose (a liquid synthetic sugar used to treat constipation and/or to reduce ammonia levels in the liver) 15 milliliters. The MAR revealed the medication had been signed off as given on 5/20/25. On 5/20/25 at 9:47 AM, an interview was conducted with Nurse 'Q', (R46's assigned nurse) regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote self-determination for two (R112 and R13) of two residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: R112 On 5/20/25 at 11:14 AM, R112 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the foyer area with other residents and activity staff. Upon request, staff moved R112 to an area of the foyer away from the other residents. R112 was asked if they enjoyed the activities at the facility. R112 explained they would rather be in their room. Activity Aide (AA) H was informed R112 wanted to go back to their room. AA H explained R112 needed to stay in activities because they were a fall risk. Review of the clinical record revealed R112 was admitted into the facility on 4/15/25 with diagnoses that included: obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression and anxiety. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R112 scored 12/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to establish a resident centered comprehensive care plan for one (R49) of one Resident with contractures (hardening of the muscles, tendons, and other soft tissues) reviewed for care plans resulting in unmet care needs. Findings include: R49 Record review revealed R49 was a long-term resident of the facility. R49 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R49 was recently admitted to hospital on [DATE] with pneumonia and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. R49's admitting diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing), anemia, dementia, and heart failure. R49 also had a stage 3 pressure ulcer (Merck manual defines a stage 3 pressure ulcer as a full-thickness skin loss with damage to subcutaneous/fat tissue extending down to [but not including] the underlying fascia. The ulcers are crater-like without underlying muscle or bone exposure) on their coccyx (tail bone area) that they had acquired during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per professional standards for two (R120 and R124) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R120 On 5/21/25 at 8:14 AM, as part of the medication pass task, LPN A was observed to mix 17 grams (g) of Polyethylene Glycol Powder (a laxative) in water in a small cup. LPN A also prepared two oral medications. LPN A entered R120's room, told R120 one of their medications was not available, however LPN A did not tell R120 what the medication was. LPN A then gave R120 the two prepared oral medications, without telling them what they were, then handed R120 the small cup of water with the Polyethylene Glycol Powder mixed into it. R120 put the two oral medications in their mouth, and took two sips of the Polyethylene Glycol Powder mixture, and handed the full cup back to LPN A. LPN A asked R120 if they wanted to finish the cup. R120 explained they only wanted enough to swallow the medication. LPN A then took the full cup with the Polyethylene Glycol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living (ADL) care for showers, hair care, nail care, and facial hair care were provided for three residents, (R#'s 103, 53, and 284), of four residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in verbalized complaints and frustration with personal hygiene and grooming. Findings include: R103 On 5/20/25 at 10:00 AM, R103 was observed in their bed. R103 presented with uncombed hair that had a shiny/greasy appearance. They were further observed to have a full moustache and beard and their nails were observed to have thick brown debris under the nail beds. They were asked if staff assisted them with personal hygiene/grooming and said they did not. They were then asked about their preference for facial hair and said they never liked a beard or a moustache but no one would help them with shaving. On 5/21/25 at 2:39 PM, a review of R103's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed they had intact cognition and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to consistently implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions as ordered for one (R49) of two residents (with pressure ulcers) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention/management. This deficient practice has potential for worsening pressure ulcer and development of new pressure ulcer (s): Findings include: R49 Record review revealed R49 was a long-term resident of the facility. R49 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R49 was recently admitted to hospital on [DATE] with pneumonia and remitted to the facility on 3/25/25. R49's admitting diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing), anemia, dementia, and heart failure. R49 also had a stage 3 pressure ulcer (Merck manual defines a stage 3 pressure ulcer as a full-thickness skin loss with damage to subcutaneous/fat tissue extending down to [but not including] the underlying fascia. The ulcers are crater-like without underlying muscle or bone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (R110) resident of one reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) received appropriate trauma assessment with resident specific interventions for one (R110) of one Resident reviewed for trauma informed care resulting in the potential for trauma triggers and re-traumatization. Findings include: Record review revealed R110 was a long-term resident of the facility, admitted on [DATE]. R110's admitting diagnoses included PTSD, major depressive disorder with severe psychotic symptoms, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorders, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of R110's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a most recent social work assessment tilted social work re-eval dated 4/1/25. The social work assessment included the above diagnoses including PTSD. Further review of R110's EMR did not reveal any PTSD assessment since their admission to the facility. R110 was receiving psychiatry services through the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00151872 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the abuse policy that requires a complete background check for newly hired staff for one (Staff C) of three staff members reviewed for background checks/abuse. Findings include: A review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C was completed during the survey as part of an abuse investigation. LPN C was hired on 3/18/25. Review of their personnel file revealed background screening reports and fingerprint appointment date of 3/20/25. The screening report did not indicate that fingerprints for LPN C had been performed based on the documents that were in the personnel file. An interview with Human Resource (HR) coordinator E was completed on 4/10/25 at approximately 4PM. They were queried about the fingerprints for LPN C. They reported that they had kept the fingerprints on a separate binder, and they would check. Later they came and reported that that they did not have any fingerprints completed for LPN C and they added that the staff member was scheduled to go for their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00151872, MI00151053 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse to the abuse coordinator and State Agency for two (R501 and R503) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A facility reported incident was submitted to the State Agency on 2/26/2025 at 10:17 AM that revealed on 2/23/25 a family member visiting R503 was notified by R503 that a staff member had thrown a washcloth or towel at them earlier that day. The Family member notified R503's charge nurse of the allegation. The charge nurse failed to notify the abuse coordinator timely resulting in the failure of the Facility to notify the State Agency and initiate an investigation timely. An initial report of this allegation was submitted to the State Agency on 2/26/25, approximately 64 hours after the allegation was reported to the staff member by a family member. Review of the facility investigation report submitted to the State Agency revealed that abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00151919 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were enjoyable and served at palatable temperatures due to use of disposable Styrofoam containers for three sampled residents (R502, R504, and R505) from a total of three sampled residents reviewed for food palatability. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency that read that food served by the facility were not palatable. An initial observation was completed on 4/10/25 at approximately 9 AM in the 100 hallway. The observation was made from the main nursing station in the 100 hallway near rooms (150s). A meal cart was parked in the hallway and staff were observed picking up breakfast trays from resident rooms. The breakfast meal was in Styrofoam boxes placed on the tray. The surveyor opened the cart and observed six breakfast trays with a Styrofoam box on every tray. Later that day staff were observed picking up trays from room [ROOM NUMBER], the trays had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00146351 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely submission of physician/physician extender progress notes for each visit for two residents (R#'s 901 and 902) of two residents reviewed for progress notes. Findings include: R901 A review of R901's closed clinical record was reviewed and revealed the following: A progress note from Nurse Practitioner (NP) 'C' with an effective date of [DATE] at 12:00 AM, entered into the record on [DATE] at 9:34 PM. It was revealed this note was entered into the record after the resident's death on [DATE]. R902 A review of R902's closed clinical record was reviewed and revealed the following: A progress note with an effective date of [DATE] at 12:00 AM, created and entered into the record on [DATE] at 10:37 AM. A progress note with an effective date of [DATE] at 12:00 AM, created and entered into the record by NP 'C' on [DATE] at 10:39 AM. A progress note with an effective date of [DATE] at 12:00 AM, created…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report to the Administrator and the State Agency an injury of unknown origin for one (R903) of one resident reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of R903's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part: end stage renal failure and heart disease. R903 census notes indicated the resident was discharged to the hospital on 7/29/24 and returned on 8/20/24. A review of the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with most Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Continued review of R903's clinical record revealed, in part, the following: 9/9/24- Nurse Notes: Resident has an <sic> red raised lump on the left side of the back head. Resident is unable to explain the cause, no c/o (complaints) of pain .Resident has been sent out to (name redacted) Hospital for observations . Authored by Nurse D.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #146351. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical documentation met professional standards for one resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for professional standards. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency alleged staff entered late progress notes and documented in the clinical record after a resident's death. A review of R901's clinical record was conducted and revealed a Late Entry progress note for 8/2/24 at 5:19 AM entered into the record on 8/9/24 at 9:38 PM, (seven days later) by Nurse 'B' that read, .Resident observed in bed unresponsive, no pluse <sic> or respirations noted .Hospice Nurse, physician and family notified . Continued review of R901's clinical record revealed Nurse 'B' documented the Effective outcome of as needed pain and anti-anxiety medications at approximately 6 AM, after the documented time of R901's death. On 10/7/24 at 3:17 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Nursing regarding when the note regarding R901's death should have been entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00147067 and MI00147277 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete accurate skin assessments, ensure residents were seen in a timely matter by wound staff/practitioners, ensure appropriate treatment and services/interventions were timely implemented for pressure ulcers for two residents (R#'s 902 and 903) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resulting in R903 developing a stage 3 pressure ulcer to their sacrum, left heel and worsening of their right heel. Findings include: R903 A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged that R903 obtained wounds on both their heels and coccyx/sacrum while residing at the facility. They further noted that R903 was not turned frequently, and the facility failed to put physician ordered boots on the resident until two days prior to their discharge. Review of R903's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part: end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for multiple residents, including (R8, R90, R20 and R79) out of sixteen residents reviewed for dining. Findings include: On 6/10/24 at approximately 12:05 PM, during observations of the large dining room, several residents were observed sitting at various tables. Residents at three different tables were observed being assisted with their meals. Other residents, who had yet to be served their lunch were watching the other residents eat their lunch. At approximately 12:20 PM, several residents who did not receive 1:1 food assistance had still had not received their lunch meals and reported that they were hungry. R8 noted that the delay in receiving food in the dining room happens often. Final food trays were served to residents at approximately 12:30 PM. On 6/11/24 at approximately 12:02 PM, a second dinning observation was conducted. Again, several residents were observed sitting at various tables in the large dining room. There were approximately four residents observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure water and other fluids were available and accessible for one resident (R78) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs resulting in the potential for thirst and complications from dehydration. Findings include: On 6/10/24 at 12:40 PM, R78 was observed in their bed with their lunch tray placed over them on the over-bed table. It was observed R78 had a pureed meal and two magic cup supplements on their tray. It was further observed two full cups of thickened orange juice were in the room, but they were placed across the room on the dresser with lids placed over them. A staff member entered the room set up the tray (removed the dome from the entree, opened the magic cups) and exited the room. They were not observed to remove the lids from the juices and place them on the over-bed table, or anywhere within R78's reach. On 6/10/24 at approximately 2:55 PM, R78 was observed in their bed, the juices remained out of reach on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living (ADL) care for two residents (R#39 and 98) of four residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in the potential for hunger and embarrassment from poor personal hygiene. Findings include: R39 On 6/10/24 at 9:46 AM, R39 was observed lying in their bed. R39 had tube feeding delivered via pump at 60 milliliters per hour and did not respond to any attempts at verbal communication. It was observed R39's nails were long in length and had visible dark debris underneath the nail bed. On 6/11/24 at 9:44 AM and 6/12/24 at 8:25 AM, R39's fingernails were observed to remain long with dark debris under the nail beds. R39 did not respond to any attempts at verbal communication during the observations. On 6/10/24 at 1:21 PM, an observation of the meal service on the Oakland Unit was conducted. At the conclusion of the lunch meal staff were observed placing dirty trays on the cart for return to the kitchen. An observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to advocate for legal representation for one resident (R107), of one resident reviewed for a provision of social services, resulting in R107 having no one to legally advocate for them. Findings include: A review of R107's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, hallucinations, and dementia. A review of a Statement of Capacity dated 3/21/23 was reviewed and revealed R107 had been found, To be incapable and unable to make his/her informed medical decisions . A review of scanned documents in R107's medical record did not reveal any documents to indicate R107 had a legal decision maker. 6/11/24 at 10:25 AM, an interview with Social Services Staff 'K' was conducted and they were asked if R107 had a Durable Power of Attorney or Legal Guardian and said they did not. They were asked why, considering R107 had been deemed not competent to make their own medical decisions on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records regarding resident treatment for one (R74) out of one resident reviewed for medical records. Findings include: On 6/10/24 at approximately 10:02 AM, R 74 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer questions asked. R74 reported that they had been at the facility for about two years. The resident noted that they did not get out of bed as they could not stand, they also noted that their right arm was paralyzed and did not work. R74 tried to show the Surveyor that their right hand/arm was not functional. During the observation the resident was not wearing a splint. A review of R74's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: vascular dementia, depression and type II diabetes. Continued review of R74's record noted that the resident was on a Maintenance Splint Program that noted Apply right hand splint up to 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow accepted practices for infection control as it relates to transmission-based precautions (TBP) and contact precautions for six residents, (R#'s 118, 16, 85, 25, 43, and 116) of 10 residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for the development and spread of infection. Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) was reviewed and read, .Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated for residents with any one of the following:2) a wound or indwelling medical devices .Indwelling medical devices include central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, and tracheostomies .It is the intent of this facility to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in addition to Standard Precautions for preventing the transmission of CDC (Centers for Disease Control) targeted multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROS) .Healthcare personnel caring for residents on Enhanced Precautions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two residents were assessed for the safe self-administration of medication (R12 and R43) of two residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: R12 On 6/10/24 at approximately 10:24 a.m., R12 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R12 was observed to be administering a nebulizer solution treatment by themselves in the room with no Nurse present. On 6/10/24 the medical record for R12 was reviewed and revealed the following: R12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia with mood disturbance, Mild cognitive impairment, and Polyneuropathy. A review of R12's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/3/24 revealed R12 had a BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) of 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition. A review of R12's Physician orders, comprehensive care plan and assessments did not reveal any indication that R12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing services met professional standards for medication administration for one resident (R114) out of one reviewed for professional standards. Findings Include: On 6/11/24, a clinical record review revealed R114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with most recent admission with Hospice services on 5/30/24. R114's diagnoses included: COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Atrial Fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), hypertension, heart disease, and new onset bladder pain and spasms. Psychiatric history included anxiety and dementia. A Brief Interview for Mentals Status (BIMS) score totaled 5/15 indicating R114 has severe cognitive impairment. On 06/10/24 at 10:17 AM, R114 was observed lying in bed and identified 2 pills lying next to resident (one white tablet and one green capsule). Observation of the environment identified one white tab on the floor in front of the radiator, one cream colored capsule was identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide meaningful, diverse and engaging activities for one (R74) out of two residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: On 6/10/24 at approximately 10:02 AM, R 74 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer questions asked. R74 reported that they had been at the facility for about two years. The resident was watching television. When asked about life at the facility the resident reported that they are bored all the time. The resident noted that they did not get out of bed as they could not stand, they also noted that their right arm was paralyzed, and their legs did not work. When asked if they engage in any activities, R74 reported that all they do is watch TV. When asked if they had been offered any other activities to perform in their room, they reported that they had not. The resident noted that the activity schedule was posted on their armoire, but due to vision problems they could not even see the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two (2) deficient practices. Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform ongoing, accurate clinical assessments and ensure interdisciplinary team (IDT) collaboration for care for one resident (R116), of two residents reviewed for assessment and care, resulting in prolonged placement of an unused Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube, pain and recurrent infections at the PEG tube site. Findings Include: On 6/11/24 at 11:07, an observation of R116's PEG (a tube surgically placed in the abdomen for the use of artificial nutrition and hydration) site was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. The observation revealed a split gauze dressing dated 6/11 placed on the abdomen covering the insertion site. The exterior right side of the gauze was observed with an area of dark red blood. Removal of the dressing revealed moderate amounts of dark red blood, and bright red blood on the gauze surrounding area of PEG insertion. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered Liters of oxygen per minute were delivered via concentrator for one resident (R47), of one resident reviewed for oxygen therapy resulting in elevated blood oxygen levels. Findings include: On 6/10/24 at 9:52 AM, R47 was observed in bed asleep with oxygen being delivered via nasal cannula at six Liters per minute. On 6/10/24 at 1:45 PM, 6/11/24 at 9:30 AM, and 1:54 PM and 6/12/24 8:26 AM, observations of R47's oxygen concentrator revealed the settings at six Liters. On 6/10/24 at 1:59 PM, a review of R47's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (COPD) pneumonia, dependence on oxygen, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of R47's orders revealed an order dated 5/20/24 that read, .Oxygen saturation of 93-94% (Oxygen 3-4L (Liters)/min (minute) ATC (around the clock) via nasal cannula). Directions: every shift avoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician orders were in place for treatment, monitoring and assessing one resident (R43) who was on hemodialysis of two residents reviewed for dialysis care. findings include: On 6/10/24 at approximately 10:08 a.m., R43 was observed in their room, up in their bed. R43 was queried if they were on dialysis services, and they indicated that they were. R43 was queried if the Nursing staff were assessing their dialysis access site and they indicated that they do not assess it on a regular basis. On 6/11/24 at approximately 10:09 a.m., R43 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R43 was queried if the nursing staff have recently assessed their dialysis access site and they reported sometimes, not every day or anything. R43 was queried if the staff are wearing gowns when the provide care to them and the indicated that they do not. On 6/10/24 the medical record for R43 was reviewed and revealed the following: R43 was initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive duplicate/unnecessary medication for one (R20) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A medical record review of R20's drug regimen was conducted. There was an order for Montelukast sodium (a medication generally used to treat asthma like symptoms)10mg (milligrams) oral tab once daily for allergies started on 5/4/24 and another order for Montelukast Sodium 10mg oral tab once daily for hypertension started on 3/15/24. Both orders were currently active and R20 according to the documentation was receiving a total of 20mg a day. On 6/12/24 at 11:00AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and asked why did R20 have two orders in for the same medication and is the indication of hypertension appropriate for this drug. The DON replied that she would have to ask the nurse practitioner (NP) if it was supposed to be two orders for the medication and that hypertension was not an appropriate indication for that medication. On 6/12/24 at 12:00PM the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and confirm a resident's narcotic medication (Morphine) and ensure medication carts were locked for two of three medication carts reviewed and failed to properly secure one unattended medication cart. Findings Include: On 6/11/24 at 8:47 AM, an observation of the [NAME] medication cart was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. The narcotic drawer was observed having 30 syringes (three separate clear bags each containing ten syringes) labeled Morphine Sulfate 10 mg (milligrams)/5ml (milliliters). LPN A acknowledged no resident identifiers were placed on the medication and would have to contact pharmacy. On 6/11/24 at 1:29 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated pharmacy sent them with no names, was aware of the findings and indicated they were returned to pharmacy. Review of the facilities policy titled; Controlled Substances 10/2023 documented: .When a controlled substance is delivered from the pharmacy, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment/assistive devices used to assist with eating were provided for one resident (R17) of 19 residents reviewed for dining. Findings include: R17 On 6/10/24 at approximately 12:33 p.m., R17 was observed in the dining room, attempting to eat the lunch meal. R17's meal ticket was observed and indicated R17 was to be provided a divided plate and a two-handed spouted cup. R17 was not observed to have been provided either of the assistive devices. On 6/11/24 at approximately 12:17 p.m., R17 was observed in the dining room, attempting to eat the lunch meal. R17's meal ticket was observed and indicated R17 was to be provided a divided plate and a two-handed spouted cup. R17 was not observed to have their divided plate but still had not been provided the spouted cup. On 6/11/24 the medical record for R17 was reviewed and revealed the following: R17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake MI00142567. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide one resident(R502) with a shower resulting in a medically missed appointment due to being unclean. Findings include: A complaint was received by the State Agency that alleged that R502 had missed a dentist appointment because of a missed shower and not wanting to got to an appointment dirty and smelly. A record review revealed that on 1/30/24 a progress noted stated that R502 . has scheduled doctor's appointment. Resident refused to go to his doctor appointment at this time due to the weather and a missed shower . A further review of the record revealed the R502 did miss a shower, no shower was documented on the certified nursing assistant task. On 3/20/24 at 10:00AM an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing(DON), she was asked why didn't R502 receive a shower prior to the known scheduled appointment, the DON replied, that she was not for sure but she could get the unit manager who was over the unit at the time. On 3/20/24 at 10:10AM an interview with Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Citation for intake MI00142569. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment, free from avoidable urine odors for two resident (R501 and R506) of two residents reviewed for environment. Findings include: On 3/19/24 at 10:00 AM, an observation of R501's room made with the Director of Nursing (DON), there was a strong urine like odor in the room. An assessment or R501's skin was made to rule out any pressure injuries and upon turning R501, their brief was visibly soiled, the DON then asked could the Certified Nursing Assistant rendering care to R501 to assist with a brief change. On 3/19/24 at 1:00 PM, another observation of R501's room was made and the same strong odor was present. On 3/19/24 at 1:15 PM an observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER] (R506's room), there was trash and food on the floor, R506 was asked does the room get routine cleaning and R506 stated, No, there was a housekeeper who entered into my room and stated they would be back but normally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This pertains to intake MI00143370. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to obtain and follow prescribed orders for the maintenance of a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line for one resident (R501) or one resident reviewed for PICC lines. Findings include: On 3/19/24 at 10:00 AM, R501 was observed in their room lying in bed. A skin assessment was completed. A brief assessment of the skin revealed that R501 had a PICC line in the upper right arm with a dressing dated for 3/15/2024. A record review revealed that there was no maintenance order in to care for the PICC, and or to assess the site. There was also an order in for the removal of the PICC for 3/19/24. On 3/20/24 at 9:30 AM an observation of R501 was made the PICC line was still intact in the resident's right upper arm with a dressing date of 3/15/24. On 3/20/24 at 10:00 AM, an interview with the Director of nursing (DON) was completed. The DON was asked what the policy for PICC line maintenance was, DON explained she would have to pull the policy. The DON was asked if there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00138372 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal dignity for four residents (R#'s 67, 32, 82, and 2) of 21 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at 9:07 AM, a conversation was conducted with Nurse 'A' regarding the breakfast tray delivery. Nurse 'A' said the trays for the, feeders were delivered to the unit before the other trays. On 7/26/23 at 12:00 PM, Nurse 'B' was asked what time the lunch meal arrived to the [NAME]/Telegraph unit. Nurse 'A' was asked what time the lunch trays arrived to the unit and said the feeders trays were due around noon. On 7/26/23 from 12:10 PM to 12:40 PM, an observation of the lunch meal on the [NAME]/Telegraph unit was conducted. R67 was seated with R32, it was observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 'C' was alternately feeding both R67 and R32 simultaneously. R2 was observed in the dining room seated with R82. R82 had been served their meal at approximately 12:10 PM, and by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure water was within reach for three residents (R#'s 5, 2, and 60) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at 10:08 AM, R5 was observed in their bed. R5's bedside table with their drinking water was against the wall approximately four feet away from the bed. On 7/25/23 at 10:58 AM, R2 was observed in their bed asleep. R2's bedside table with their drinking water was observed to be approximately four feet to the left of the bed. On 7/25/23 at 3:32 PM, R60 was observed in their bed asleep. R60's bedside table with their drinking water was observed against the wall on the right side of the bed, approximately five feet away from the bedside. On 7/26/23 at at 11:02 AM, R5 was observed in their geri-chair on the right side of their bed. It was observed their bedside table with their drinking water was on the left side of the bed, several feet out of R5's reach. On 7/26/23 at 3:52 PM and 7/27/23 at 9:34 AM, R60 was observed in their bed. At those times, R60's bedside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident treatments were documented when completed for nine residents (R11, R31, R41, R45, R53, R72, R92, and R221) of nine reviewed for Nursing standards of practice. Findings include: On 7/26/23 the medical records for R11, R31, R41, R45, R53, R72, R92, and R221 were reviewed and revealed the following treatments were not documented as being completed during the night shift in the July 2023 treatment administration record (TAR) on July 21st. Resident #11-Apply A&D ointment to bilateral lower extremities q (every) hs (night) and prn (as needed) at bedtime for Prevention . Resident #31-Ammonium Lactate External Cream 12 % (Lactic Acid (Ammonium Lactate) Apply to BLE (bilateral lower extremities) topically every night shift for wound Resident #41-Cleanse buttock with normal saline. Apply Chamosyn every shift . Resident #45-Cleanse bi-lat buttock and apply zguard every shift for redness Resident #53-Apply Eucerin Cream to bilateral lower extremities BID (twice daily) every day and night shift and skin prep to right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized and meaningful activities for thirteen residents (R#'s 15, 14, 221, 29, 67, 11, 74, 32, 91, 73, 2, 45, and 82) of 47 residents who resided on the [NAME] and Telegraph Units, resulting in the potential for feelings of boredom and decreased quality of life. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at 10:51 AM, R15, R14, R221, R29, and R67 were observed seated in their wheelchairs in the [NAME]/Telegraph Unit common area. Staff were noted to be going about the unit performing their duties. The resident's were not being engaged with by staff, there was no television, radio, reading material, sensory activities or other type of activity supplies in the area. On 7/25/23 at 1:27 PM, R14, R11, R221, R74, and R32 were observed seated in the [NAME]/Telegraph common area. Staff were not observed engaging with residents and no formal activities were observed to be taking place. It was further observed R32 was positioned at a table, facing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were appropriate stored in three of four medication carts, two of two medication rooms, and one of one treatment cart, resulting in the potential for unauthorized entry, misuse, contamination, and diversion. Findings include: On 7/27/23 at 12:40 PM, an observation of the medication room on the [NAME]/Telegraph unit was conducted with Nurse 'F'. The cabinet underneath the hand sink contained a large box of various lab supplies (specimen containers, swabs, alcohol pads, and empty sharps containers). When asked if anything should be stored underneath the sink, Nurse 'F' reported there should not. On 7/27/23 at 12:50 PM, an observation of a medication cart on the [NAME]/Telegraph unit was conducted with Nurse 'F' (not their assigned cart, but had access to keys since that nurse was unavailable). There was a container of blood glucose testing strips that had been opened with no label/date of opening. Nurse 'F'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains in part to intake MI00137730 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for one room (145) and one (R71) of seven residents reviewed for environment. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at 10:28 AM, upon entering room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a foul odor of undetermined origin. The odor was pervasive throughout the entire semi-private room. On 7/25/23 at 12:08 PM and 12:54 PM, the same pervasive odor was present in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 7/25/23 at 4:14 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) S was interviewed and asked about the odor in room [ROOM NUMBER]. LPN S explained she did not know what the smell was, but thought is smelled like Penicillin or some kind of antibiotic or medications. On 7/25/23 at 4:18 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) K was interviewed and asked about the odor in room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA K explained she thought it smelled like an antibiotic or a gas. When asked how long the odor had been in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that showers were offered, provided, and documented for two residents (R25 and R48) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living care (ADLs), resulting in feelings of depression, being dirty, and dissatisfaction with care. Findings include: Resident #25 (R25) On 7/25/23 at 2:08 PM, during an initial tour of the facility, R25 was interviewed about their care at the facility and indicated that they had not been receiving their scheduled showers on a consistent basis. R25 indicated that they had not been offered a shower in over a week. R25 stated, I feel depressed and dirty. On 7/27/23 at 9:21 AM, R25's shower schedule was reviewed and their shower documentation was reviewed for the months of June and July 2023. R25's scheduled shower days were scheduled on Mondays and Wednesdays day shift. Documentation of showers offered and provided on R25's scheduled shower days revealed the following, R25 was not offered or provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services to prevent recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI's) for one (R41) of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: Review of a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) document titled, State Operations Manual Appendix PP revised 2/3/23 read in part, .Follow-Up of UTIs: The goal of treating a UTI is to alleviate systemic or local symptoms, not to eradicate all bacteria . Continued bacteriruia without residual symptoms does not warrant repeat or continued antibiotic therapy. Recurrent UTIs (2 or more in 6 months) in a noncatherterized individual may warrant additional evaluation (such as a determination of an abnormal post void residual (PVR) urine volume or a referral to a urologist) to rule out structural abnormalities such as enlarged prostate, prolapsed bladder, periurethral abscess, strictures, bladder calculi, polyps and tumors . Review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program revealed R41 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications to treat pain were available for administration for two residents (R19 and R225) of two residents reviewed for pain management resulting in the potential for pain to go untreated. Findings include: Resident #19 On 7/25/23 The medical record for R19 was reviewed and revealed the following: R19 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Quadriplegia and Generalized abdominal pain. A review of R19's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 5/4/23 revealed R19 was on a scheduled pain medication regimen and required assistance from facility staff with all of their activities of daily living. A review of R19's careplan revealed the following: Focus-[R19] is at risk for pain r/t (related to) dx (diagnoses) chronic pain, quadriplegia, htn (Hypertension), anemia . A Physician's order dated 5/22/23 revealed the following: fentaNYL Transdermal Patch 72 Hour 50 MCG/HR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2011 |
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2011 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/20/2025 |
| AVERY, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/16/2022 |
| PATEL, PURVAJ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2011 |
| DEUTSCH, NEAL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
| GARDINA, ANNA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235260. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.