No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Laurels Of Steubenville The

500 Stanton Boulevard, Steubenville, OH 43952 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (740) 264-5042 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 264-5042 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jan 2026
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2196 Sunset Blvd · (740) 264-0111 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.2 mi
2001 Sunset Blvd · (740) 282-0173 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.1 mi
264 S Hollywood Blvd · (740) 264-5057 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Murphy Ave · (740) 283-6000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2105 Sunset Blvd · (740) 282-9064

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.4%30.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.5%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.9%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.111.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.061.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.7%CMS range 47.0–60.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.5–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified75.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting51.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.1%CMS range 7.2–15.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.78
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
48.8%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 85.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-20)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of hospice records, review of a facility soft file, interview, and policy review the facility failed to implement an effective pain management program, including the administration of scheduled and as needed opioid medication to effectively manage Resident #86's pain.Actual Harm occurred beginning on [DATE], when Resident #86, who was identified with chronic pain and a new onset of end of life care for pain management, did not receive scheduled or as needed Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication), resulting in uncontrolled pain affecting the resident's end of life care requiring increasing and changing the residents pain medication to re-gain control of the resident's pain. This affected one resident (#86) of three residents reviewed for pain.Findings include: Review of Resident #86's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome, Parkinsonism, pain and stiffness in right and left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to adequately address residents' complaints of pain for two (Residents #29 and #326) of five residents reviewed for pain. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #326 on 11/13/22 after staff assessed her with pain which was almost constant with a severity of nine on a scale of zero to ten with acknowledgment Resident #326 had no pain interventions in place, but did not pursue attempts to provide pain relief. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #29 on 11/14/22 after she was noted crying with interview revealing she was having pain from a fractured shoulder and requested ordered pain medication which the nurse refused to administer stating Resident #29 had been medicated earlier. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #326's medical record revealed diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus and diabetic neuropathy (type of nerve damage which can cause pain). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication was not misappropriated. This affected one resident (#86) of three residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include:Closed record review revealed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome, Parkinsonism, pain and stiffness in right and left shoulder, osteoarthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, thrombocytopenia, metabolic encephalopathy, aphasia, and cerebral infarction. The resident was discharged to the hospice facility on 07/28/25. Review of Resident #86's significant change in status minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was absent of spoken words and sometimes understood. The resident had severe cognition impairment and no behavioral symptoms. Resident #86 was on a scheduled pain medication regimen and could not answer the pain assessment interview questions. The staff assessment pain section was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, clean and comfortable environment for all residents. This affected residents residing in 10 of 13 rooms observed, involved one of two resident shower/bathing rooms and had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:On 08/06/2025 between 11:20 A.M. and 12:17 P.M. observations of random rooms throughout the facility with Housekeeping Supervisor #190 revealed the following concerns which were verified by the supervisor at the time of the observation: Handrails in the hallway outside the dining room and office areas were observed being used by multiple unidentified residents as they propelled themselves to the main dining room. The inside ledge of the handrails were dusty with some debris observed. This was verified by the Administrator at the beginning of the tour. room [ROOM NUMBER] had dirt observed around the baseboard while entering the room. In the bathroom, a bag with a brief was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders were implemented for fall interventions for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include:Review of Resident #1's open medical record revealed diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, hypertensive heart disease, major depressive disorder, solitary pulmonary nodule, aneurysm of the ascending aorta, fatty liver, diverticulosis, and affective mood disorder.Review of Resident #1's admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. Resident #1 required one person assist with toileting and ambulation with a device. Fall risks identified included fear of falling/muscle weakness/decreased lower extremity joint function/balance deficit or gait deficit and medication use. Interventions included encouraging Resident #1 to wear appropriate footwear as needed, keeping the environment as safe as possible, Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices during medication administration and incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #9) of seven residents observed for medication administration and one (Resident #84) of one resident observed for incontinence care. Findings include: On 08/06/25 between 9:00 A.M. and 9:16 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #140 was observed preparing and administering medication to Resident #84. While preparing medication a famotidine 20 milligram (mg) tablet (used to reduce stomach acid production) was dropped on the floor. LPN #140 picked the medication up off the floor and disposed of it. Hand hygiene was not performed. LPN #140 continued to prepare and administer the other four medications (duloxetine 20 mg which is an anti-depressant, florastor 250 mg which is a probiotic, olmesartan 20 mg used to treat high blood pressure and oxycodone IR 5 mg which is a pain medication) to Resident #84. During the medication administration, LPN #140 was observed touching items in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure over the counter medication had clearly labeled expiration dates. This was identified in two of four medication carts and had the potential to affect 18 residents (Residents #1, #9, #12, #25, #32, #37, #39, #47, #52, #54, #55, #59, #71, #73, #184, #285, #293, #296) of 24 residents with orders for aspirin 81 milligrams (mg). In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for Residents #289 and #292. This affected two residents (#289 and #292) of three residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. On 03/17/25 at 9:27 A.M., RN #1006 was observed preparing and administering medication to Resident #59. One tablet of 81 mg aspirin was prepared and administered. The aspirin bottle had no expiration date. RN #1006 verified she was unable to find an expiration date during the preparation but administered the medication anyway. On 03/19/25 at 8:10 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #289's catheter bag was covered to ensure privacy. This affected one resident (#289) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility identified five residents (#2, #11, #70, #289 and #297) as using catheters in the facility. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #289 revealed an admission date of 03/13/25. Diagnoses included sepsis, muscle weakness, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, sleep apnea, arthritis, kidney failure, and pulmonary fibrosis. Review of the physicians' orders for March 2025 revealed an order for Foley catheter care every shift. Review of the care plan dated 03/13/25 revealed Resident #289 was at risk for urinary tract infection and catheter related trauma. Interventions included changing the catheter and tubing, ensuring the urinary drainage bag was secured properly with the dignity cover in place and ensuring the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that advanced directives were consistent within the medical record. This affected two of two residents (#138 and #139) sampled for advanced directives. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #138's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses including dementia, repeated falls, atrial fibrillation, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Further review revealed Resident #138's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was in the process of being completed and an evaluation was completed for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealing a score of three indicating Resident #138 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #138's medical record revealed an order dated [DATE] and a notation in the information banner, that appears on each screen of the resident's electronic medical record, indicating Resident #138 was a Full Code meaning that if the resident's heart or breathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary environment for a resident with a wound. This affected one resident (#64) of 24 residents' environments which were observed. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed diagnoses including depression, emphysema, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Review of toilet use information between 03/10/25 and 03/16/25 revealed assistance required varied from independent to extensive assistance. On 03/11/25, an order was written to cleanse an abscess to the left gluteal fold with normal saline, apply Aquacel AG with border gauze daily. A skin and wound evaluation dated 03/18/25 revealed Resident #64 had an abscess of the left gluteus measuring 0.9 centimeters (cm) by 0.4 cm. The depth was listed as not applicable. The assessment indicated there was no sign of infection. On 03/17/25 at 4:40 P.M., bowel movement was observed on both sides of the toilet seat. Resident #64 was on contact isolation with the personal protective equipment (PPE) disposed of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to timely address reports of intense itching for one (Resident #60) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure-related skin impairment and failed to make timely notification of indicators of congestive heart failure for one (Resident #60) of 24 residents observed for edema. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF), type two diabetes mellitus, hypertensive heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, stage four chronic kidney disease, cardiomegaly, non-rheumatic aortic valve disorder, chronic cor pulmonale (right ventricular (RV) enlargement secondary to a lung disorder that causes pulmonary artery hypertension), history of pulmonary embolism, presence of a cardiac pacemaker, atherosclerotic heart disease, localized edema and chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of bilateral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of manufacturer information and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to address identified risk factors for pressure ulcers and failed to implement physician orders for treatment of pressure ulcers. This affected two (Residents #49 and #139) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, quadriplegia, anemia, and peripheral vascular disease. A physician's order dated 01/21/25 gave instructions to cleanse a wound to the right lateral malleolus (the bony prominence on each side of the ankle) with normal saline, pat it dry, and apply CMC fiber dressing (carboxymethylcellulose absorptive dressing for wounds with moderate to heavy exudate) to the wound bed and apply a foam patch every day and as necessary. Review of the weekly wound assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had a stage two pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #21, who was incontinent of bladder, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) and failed to ensure Resident #21, who was incontinent of bowel, received appropriate treatment and services to restore as much normal bowel function as possible. This affected one resident (#21) of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence and UTI. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, neuropathy, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), muscle weakness, antibiotic resistance, depression, and pacemaker. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 12/01/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician for Resident #289 and failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated when changed for Residents #289 and #292. This affected two residents (#289 and #292) of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility identified 18 residents (#1, #3, #15, #16, #21, #34, #44, #62, #70, #71, #139, #235, #284, #285, #289, #292, #295 and #297) who utilized oxygen. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #289 revealed an admission date of 03/13/25. Diagnoses included sepsis, muscle weakness, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, sleep apnea, arthritis, kidney failure and pulmonary fibrosis. Review of the care plan dated 03/13/25 revealed Resident #289 had difficulty breathing and was at risk for respiratory complications. Interventions included observing for difficulty breathing. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were consistently completed for Resident #66. This affected one resident (#66) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis services. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 02/04/25. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, kidney disease, muscle weakness and diabetes. Review of the care plan dated 02/04/25 revealed Resident #66 had a need for dialysis due to end stage kidney disease. Interventions included dialysis Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday, administering medications as ordered, observing for side effects and ineffectiveness of medications, checking and reinforcing the dressing at the access site as needed, and utilizing the dialysis communication form to communicate with the dialysis center. Upon return from the dialysis center the communication book would be reviewed and any updates provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure parameters were in place for the administration of pain medication and failed to ensure nonpharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administering narcotic pain medication to Resident #3. In addition, the facility failed to ensure insulin was given according to the physician's orders for Resident #21. This affected two residents (#3 and #21) of five resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed and admission date of 06/11/24. Diagnoses included depression, bronchitis, history of stroke and failure to thrive. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired. She required setup help for eating, partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene, substantial to maximum assistance for showering and dressing and was completely dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medial record and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was written for laboratory tests obtained and laboratory tests were obtained immediately (STAT) as ordered by the physician for Resident #2. This affected one resident (#2) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, cerebral infarction, diabetes, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, epilepsy, abdominal aortic aneurysm, kidney failure, hemiplegia left side, myocardial infarction, obstructive and reflux uropathy, hypertensive heart disease, chronic pain syndrome, presences of cerebrospinal fluid device, and nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Review of the Nurse's Note dated 02/05/25 at 11:31 A.M. revealed the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was called because Resident #2 was acting lethargic, with very little verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interview with staff, review of information from the PneumoRecs Vax Advisor application and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumonia vaccine was up to date for Resident #19. This affected one resident (#19) of five residents reviewed for vaccination status. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure, epilepsy, chronic kidney disease, and shortness of breath. Review of the immunizations revealed Resident #19 had the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 (PPSV23) pneumonia vaccine on 11/19/23. Review of the PneumoRecs Vax Advisor application revealed if a resident over [AGE] years of age had the PPSV23 and no other pneumonia vaccine they should be administered the Pneumonia conjugate vaccine 15 (PCV) or PCV20 after one year of administration of the PPSV23. On 03/20/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of schedules and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) did not work as a charge nurse when the facility census was greater than 60. This had the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of nursing schedules from 10/15/22 to 11/17/22 revealed the DON worked as a charge nurse on 11/12/22 between 6:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. when the census was 80 and on 11/13/22 between 3:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M. when the census was 79. On 11/15/22 at 4:22 P.M., the DON verified she worked as a charge nurse on the evening of 11/12/22 and the afternoon of 11/13/22. The DON stated she was unaware she was unable to work as a charge nurse if the census was greater than 60. On 11/17/22 at 12:15 P.M., the DON verified when she worked as a charge nurse on 11/12/22 the census was 80. On 11/17/22 at 12:41 P.M., the Administrator verified when the DON worked as a charge nurse on 11/13/22 the census was 79. The Administrator stated she was not aware the DON could not fulfill charge nurse requirements if census was greater…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure staff waited for permission to enter a resident's room while she was sleeping. This affected one resident (Resident #177) of three reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 79. Finding include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #177 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, anxiety, depression, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, back and hip pain, bradycardia, supranuclear palsy, and gastroesophageal reflux. Observation on 11/14/22 at 3:06 P.M. revealed Resident #177 was in bed sleeping. Maintenance #203, with an employee for the telephone company, knocked on the door of Resident #177's room and went into her room without waiting for the resident to wake up and give her permission to enter. Resident #177 woke up when the telephone company employee moved her bedside table and Maintenance #203 explained to her what they were doing in her room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #177. This affected one resident (Resident #177) of 24 residents observed for call lights within reach. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #177 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, anxiety, depression, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, back and hip pain, bradycardia, supranuclear palsy, and gastroesophageal reflux. Observation on 11/14/22 at 11:46 A.M. revealed the call light for Resident #177 was on the chair on the other side of the bed. Resident #177 stated she could not reach her call light because she was not able to walk over to the chair to get it. Interview on 11/14/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #238 verified the call light for Resident #177 was not within her reach. Observation on 11/15/22 at 8:17 A.M. revealed Resident #177 was up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained during a medical treatment for Resident #176. This affected one resident (Resident #176) of one reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #176 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute pulmonary edema, restless leg syndrome, hypertensive heart disease, low back pain, osteoarthritis, and intervertebral disc disease. Observation of wound care on 11/17/22 at 1:00 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #301 for Resident #176 revealed she provided wound care to both the residents heels without closing her door to the hallway or pulling the privacy curtain to maintain privacy. Interview on 11/17/22 at 1:15 P.M. LPN #301 verified she had not provided privacy to Resident #176 during wound care.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive bowel and bladder assessment was completed for Resident #67. This affected one (Resident #67) of nine residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 79. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 12/21/21. Diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, aphasia, and gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 had impaired cognition. He was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance of two staff for toilet use. Review of the care plan dated 10/28/22 revealed Resident #67 was incontinent of bowel and bladder due to a developmental delay. Interventions included checking and changing the resident's brief every two hours and changing clothing after incontinence care as needed. Review of the medical record from 12/21/21 through 11/16/22 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed as required. This affected one (Resident #5) of three residents closed records reviewed. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, Parkinson's disease, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiomyopathy. Resident #5 expired on [DATE]. Review of the completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Assessments for Resident #5 revealed an Entry Assessment was completed on [DATE] and an admission Assessment was completed on [DATE]. No other MDS 3.0 Assessments were available in the electronic health record. Review of the progress note dated [DATE] at 7:05 A.M. revealed Resident #5 expired in the facility and her time of death was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, review of activity calendars, review of activity attendance sheets, and staff interviews revealed the facility failed to provide activities to Resident #68. This affected one (Resident #68) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, Down's syndrome, epilepsy, affective mood disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis, obstructive sleep apnea, peripheral vascular disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the admission activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed gospel and country music were very important. His favorite activities were preaching and music, but he also enjoyed sports, video games, singing, played the guitar at one time, loves taking rides in the car,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and staff interview the facility failed to ensure daily weights for Resident #176 were obtained as ordered. This affected one (Resident #176) of 24 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #176 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute pulmonary edema, restless leg syndrome, hypertensive heart disease, low back pain, osteoarthritis, and intervertebral disc disease. Review of the medical record revealed at the time of the survey there was not Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment available. Review of the November 2022 physician's orders revealed Resident #176 had an order dated 11/07/22 to obtain a daily weight for congestive heart failure. Review of the daily weights in Point Click Care (PCC) revealed no documentation on weights for Resident #176 on 11/08/22, 11/09/22, 11/10/22, 11/11/22, 11/12/22, 11/13/22, and 11/14/22. Review of the November 2022 medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a medical record, observations, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a deep tissue injury (DTI) was assessed and an order was obtained timely for Resident #176. This affected one (Resident #176) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #176 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute pulmonary edema, restless leg syndrome, hypertensive heart disease, low back pain, osteoarthritis, and intervertebral disc disease. Review of the medical record revealed at the time of the survey there was not Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment available. There was no skin assessment for Resident #176 from her day of admission on [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed there were no progress notes from admission on [DATE] or 11/06/22. The first progress notes and assessment were dated 11/07/22. Review of the Nursing Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to implement appropriate care plan interventions and/or orders for fall prevention for two (Residents #29 and #63) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and Parkinson's disease. A care plan initiated 01/05/22 indicated Resident #29 was at risk for falls related injuries and weakness, Parkinson's disease, dementia, and poor safety awareness. The care plan indicated Resident #29 chose not to seek staff assistance with transferring at times and chose to self-ambulate and self-transfer. Interventions included keeping the environment as safe as possible with even floors. Another intervention which was added was use of a mat to the floor. Review of the nursing notes and/or Situational Background Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clinical assessment was completed before and after each dialysis session for Resident #51. This affected one (Resident #51) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 07/09/22 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the physician's orders for November 2022 identified orders for hemodialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had no cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated Resident #51 received dialysis treatments. Review of the Hemodialysis Communication Forms dated 08/16/22 through 11/15/22 revealed Resident #51 was not clinically assessed before going to dialysis or upon returning from dialysis treatment on 08/23/22, 08/27/22, 08/30/22, 09/06/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of pain medication, for Residents #34 and #58. This affected two (Residents #34 and #58) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 12/13/16. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, ataxic gait (impaired ability to walk), and partial weakness of the dominant right side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. He received scheduled and as needed pain medication. Review of the physician's orders for November 2022 revealed an order for Nucynta, a medication used to treat pain, 50 milligrams (mg) four times per day (QID) as needed. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #42's recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was addressed by the physician. This affected one (Resident #42) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 01/26/22. Diagnoses included dementia, visual hallucinations, and depression. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of the physician's orders for November 2022 revealed an order for Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication, 0.5 milligrams (mg) two times per day. Review of the consultation report 01/28/22 by Pharmacist #302 revealed a recommendation to reduce the dosage of Risperdal with a plan to discontinue the medication. There was no evidence the physician reviewed the recommendation or addressed it. Interview on 11/16/22 at 1:05 P.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-27 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure evening snacks were provided to all residents. This affected ten residents (#20, #41, #48, #75, #192, #51, #46, #8, #33 and #35) and had the potential to affect all 95 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident Council Minutes dated 02/11/19 to 02/10/20 revealed during the meetings held on 02/11/19, 03/11/19, 04/08/19, 06/03/19, 07/15/19, 10/14/19 and 02/10/20 the residents present at the meeting voiced concerns regarding snacks not being delivered every night or they were delivered after 9:00 P.M. when the residents were asleep or not delivered if their door was shut. The council minute notes revealed staff were provided education each month that concerns were noted. Review of the snack list revealed Resident #192 was to receive a turkey sandwich with cheese, Resident #51 a deli sandwich, Resident #46 cottage cheese with tomatoes, Resident #8 ham and cheese on gluten free bread, Resident #33 a meat sandwich and Resident #35 deli sandwich. Observation on 02/27/20 at 8:42…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) were completed and accurate to capture changes in diagnosis warranting a reassessment. This affected four residents (#9, #24, #34 and #51) of four residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's 08/09/17 PASSAR revealed no diagnoses under the question Does the individual have a diagnosis of any of the mental disorders listed below? The question was answered no. The list included other psychotic disorders and Schizophrenia. Record review revealed Resident #24's was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #24's diagnoses list revealed an added diagnosis of unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition added 11/12/17 and schizoaffective disorder added 10/19/18. Record review revealed as 02/25/20 the facility had not completed/submitted a new PASARR for the resident to capture the new diagnoses and to determine if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to maintain Resident #59's dignity related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#59) of two residents observed with an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including urinary retention related to obstruction uropathy. Review of the quarterly Nursing Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] and the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 02/24/20 at 12:16 P.M., observation during the lunch meal revealed Resident #59's indwelling catheter bag was attached to the underside of his specialized wheelchair uncovered. Yellow urine was observed in the catheter bag. On 02/24/20 at 2:35 P.M., observation revealed Resident #59 was sitting in his reclined specialized wheelchair in the common area across from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a dining table at an appropriate height to accommodate Resident #57's needs. This affected one resident (#57) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including coronary artery disease, weakness, lack of coordination and pain in left shoulder. Review of Resident #57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/17/19 revealed the resident required extensive assistance from one person for bed mobility, transfers, and dressing. For eating, the resident required supervision and set-up help. During observation on 02/24/20 at 12:10 P.M., Resident #57 was sitting in her wheelchair at a dining table in the main ding room. The top of table was level with the resident's upper chest, requiring the resident to reach up with her arms to access the food. During a subsequent observation on 02/27/20 at 5:10 P.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were accurately completed for Resident #53 and Resident #86. This affected two residents (#53 and #86) of 31 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission dated of 04/02/18 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, cerebral infarction, contracted left elbow and peripheral vascular disease. Review of a 01/16/20 Skin and Wound Evaluation revealed a new in house acquired right buttock abrasion measuring 2.0 centimeters (cm) by 5.2 cm with a pink/red wound bed and light serous exudates. Review of a 01/16/20 Skin and Wound Evaluation revealed an in house acquired left buttock abrasion measuring 2.8 centimeters (cm) by 2.6 cm with a pink/red wound bed and light serous exudates. A 01/22/20 nurse's note indicated the physician visualized the areas on the buttocks and reviewed the Skin and Wound evaluations. The physician was aware of and agrees with the origin of wound being an abrasion that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop, implement and provide residents/representatives with a baseline plan of care as required. This affected two resident (#58 and #284) of eight residents reviewed for baseline plans of care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #284's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/15/20 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder and congestive heart failure. Review of the physician's orders included an order for the medication, Seroquel (an antipsychotic), an order for the medication, Sertraline (an antidepressant) and daily weights. Record review revealed no evidence the facility had provided the resident and the resident's representative with a summary of a baseline care plan that included but was not limited to: (i) The initial goals of the resident. (ii) A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions. (iii) Any services and treatments to be administered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #7, who was dependent on staff for personal care was provided timely care and care according to the resident's preferences. This affected one resident (#7) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility identified 28 residents dependent on staff for bathing. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a spinal cord injury, osteoarthritis and heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision-making, required extensive assist of two staff with personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the care plan titled ADL Self-Care Performance Deficit, revised 01/09/20 revealed Resident #7 had a very specific routine of how he preferred his daily ADL's to be completed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's hearing aids were in proper working order and failed to obtain hearing aids for Resident #34. This affected two residents (#27 and #34) of three residents reviewed for hearing. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, pulmonary fibrosis, and a history of falling. Review of the plan of care, dated October 2019 revealed no documentation of hearing aids. Review of the progress notes, dated October 2019 through 02/25/20 revealed no documentation of improperly working hearing aids. Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/17/19 revealed the resident required extensive assistance from one person for bed mobility, transfers and dressing. During an interview on 02/25/20 at 2:11 P.M., Resident #27 revealed she was very hard of hearing and had not been able to wear her hearing aids for a couple of weeks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #14, who was at risk for falls was provided fall safety interventions as care planned. This affected one resident (#14) of two residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, epilepsy and history of cardiovascular accident with right-sided weakness. Review of the plan of care, dated 06/18/19 revealed the resident as at risk for falls with an intervention to wear non-skid footwear when out of bed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/05/19 revealed Resident #14 required extensive assistance from one person for locomotion and extensive assistance from two persons for bed mobility and transfers. Review of a nursing progress note, dated 11/10/19 at 6:30 P.M., revealed Resident #14 was found on floor following a fall, without injury. On 02/25/20 at 11:23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate and necessary care and treatment was provided for Resident #42 related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility also failed to ensure a bowel program was initiated for Resident #58 after a noted decline in bowel function. This affected one resident (#42) of three residents reviewed for UTI/catheters and one resident (#58) of one resident reviewed for bowel function. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including retention of urine, urinary tract infection, indwelling foley catheter and fracture of right femur. Review of Resident #42's nursing progress notes and orders dated 02/2020 revealed on 02/13/20 Resident #42 had complaints of bladder spasms and requested a prescription for Pyridium for the spasms. The physician was notified, and new orders were received for Pyridium 100 milligrams (mg) three timed daily for three days and for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for the administration of oxygen, failed to ensure humidification was properly used and/or failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a clean/sanitary manner for Resident #25, #37, and #56. This affected three residents (#25, #37 and #56) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including shortness of breath and heart failure. Review of the plan of care, dated 07/01/19 revealed Resident #56 would be free of signs and symptoms of respiratory infections. Observation on 02/24/20 at 9:50 A.M. and again at 11:00 A.M., revealed Resident #56's oxygen tubing/nasal cannula was draped over the edge and laying in the trash can. The resident was not in the room at the time of the observation. Record review revealed the resident did not have a physician order for the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #51 received behavior health services to assist the resident to attain or maintain her highest level of well-being. This affected one resident (#51) of four residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Identification Screen. Findings include: Review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Identification Screen dated 11/12/19 revealed no evidence Resident #51 had major depressive disorder or anxiety disorder, the resident consented to receiving mental health and counseling services. Further review revealed the resident did not meet nursing home criteria and her needs could be met in an appropriate community setting that could provide for her ongoing need for psychiatric support. A group home, assisted living facility should be explored for the resident. The resident had been evicted from her apartment recently and that was why she was being placed in a nursing home until other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the justified use of narcotic pain medication for Resident #284 and Resident #58. The facility failed to ensure parameters were in place related to medication administration, failed to ensure medication was administered only after a comprehensive pain assessment had been completed and/or failed to ensure evidence of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the medication administration. This affected two residents (#58 and #284) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility identified five residents on a pain management program. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #284's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/15/20 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and an artificial hip joint. A 02/15/20 plan of care was developed for actual pain acute/chronic related to chronic pain and history of back pain. The plan of care revealed the use of non pharmacological interventions. Review of the 02/20/20 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the resident was independent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #190's medical record was complete and accurate related to infection and antibiotic use. This affected one resident (#190) of 31 residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #190 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] after a hospitalization. The resident's diagnosis list indicated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) detected on 02/20/20. Review of Resident #190's hospital discharge orders, dated 02/20/20 revealed an order for the antibiotic, Amoxicillin-pot clavulanate 875 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours for seven days (quantity #14). Review of Resident #190's medication administration records (MAR) dated 02/2020 revealed on 02/21/20 an order was entered for Amoxicillin 875 mg one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for bacterial infection for 7 days. The order was discontinued and rewritten on 02/21/20 for Amoxicillin 875-125 mg one tablet every 12 hours for RSV for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive antibiotic stewardship program to monitor and prevent the unnecessary/inappropriate use of antibiotics. This affected two residents (#58 and #195) of five residents reviewed for infections. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cellulitis, acute and chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia, acute upper respiratory infections, atelectasis, acute bronchitis, heart failure, cough, dyspnea and history of lung cancer. Review of Resident #195's chest x-ray results dated 02/11/20 and 02/17/20 revealed the resident had cardiomegaly. There was no evidence of pneumonia or acute cardiopulmonary disease process noted. Review of Resident #195's nursing progress notes dated 02/18/20 revealed the resident had noted weight gain, increase sputum of yellow/green color and wheezing. New orders were received to start Aldactone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KHAN, ANISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2016
LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
FIGEL, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
RUSINOVICH-SIMS, JANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025
SELECT REHABILITATION, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
ZENITH FINANCIAL GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
STOBB, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$476K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 11%Other / private 27%

This home reported $476K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$295per resident / day
operating cost
$8,955per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366363. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next