No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Laurels Of Walden Park

5700 Karl Road, Columbus, OH 43229 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 225 certified beds · (614) 846-5420 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (614) 846-5420 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$114,649 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $114,649 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-13)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
5770 Karl Rd · (614) 847-9933 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5770 Karl Rd · (614) 847-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5461 Sandalwood Blvd · (917) 664-6118 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5600 Karl Rd · (614) 888-4600

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.5%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained2.2%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.0%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.9%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.7%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.291.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.821.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.1%CMS range 22.8–53.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.7–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge22.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 4.9–14.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
29.6%
Total nursing turnover
34.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 225 beds and averages 209.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-13)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, interviews with staff at orthopedic medical office, review of National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) guidance, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers when wearing a splint device and failed to timely identify the resident's pressure ulcers until it reached an advanced stage. Actual harm occurred on 07/30/25 when Resident #37 developed two avoidable unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcers to the underside of the index finger and to the left side of the palm hand when the facility did not remove Resident #37's splint device by the orthopedic clinic's instructions. This affected one (Resident #37) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 209. Findings include: Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #215 received adequate, timely and necessary care and services to prevent an acute change in condition related to hypokalemia (decreased potassium) level. Actual Harm occurred beginning on 10/25/24 at 3:33 P.M. when Resident #215's laboratory results reflected a low potassium level of 3.0 mmol/L (normal range 3.5 -5.0) (indicative of hypokalemia) which went unreviewed and unaddressed by facility staff. On 10/28/24 Resident #215 began to experience shortness of breath and required supplemental oxygen. On 10/30/24 Resident #215's heart rate was noted to be between 41 and 46 beats per minute (low/bradycardic) and the resident informed staff his automated implanted cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) had alarmed. On 10/31/24 at 7:30 A.M. Resident #215 was noted to have a change in condition including a new irregular pulse with a listed heart rate of 46 (bradycardic),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, wound notes review, staff interview, hospital paperwork review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound care orders were in place, as well as ensure comprehensive wound measurements were completed for Former Resident #300 upon readmission to the facility. Actual Harm occurred when Former Resident #300 was found to have maggots in a pre-existing wound to the left calf/foot area and was admitted to the hospital with a gangrenous left foot with maggot infestation and severe pain. This affected one (Former Resident #300) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 201. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Former Resident #300 revealed an original admission date of 05/11/23 with a readmission date of 07/25/23. Former Resident #300 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and had a final discharge date of 08/04/23. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, acute osteomyelitis of the left ankle and left foot, chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, open and closed medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly comprehensive wound assessments were completed, ensure skin interventions were in place and ensure wounds were accurately classified. This affected two residents (#117 and #214) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 209.Findings Include:1.Review of the closed record for Resident #214 revealed an initial admission date of 07/17/25 with the latest readmission of 08/10/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, bacteremia, chronic bronchitis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, metabolic encephalopathy, fatty liver, hypertension, anemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism of renal origin, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, dysphagia, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty in walking, benign neoplasm of colon, dependence on renal dialysis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, gout, benign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, fall investigation review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the care and supervision to prevent an unavoidable fall. This affected one resident (#214) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 209.Findings Include:Review of the closed record for Resident #214 revealed an initial admission date of 07/17/25 with the latest readmission of 08/10/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, bacteremia, chronic bronchitis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, metabolic encephalopathy, fatty liver, hypertension, anemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism of renal origin, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, dysphagia, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty in walking, benign neoplasm of colon, dependence on renal dialysis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, gout, benign neoplasm of left kidney, polyneuropathy, chronic pain syndrome, depression, guttate psoriasis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This affected eight residents (#47, #57, #70, #90, #116, #134, #179, and #225) and had the potential to affect all residents living in the facility. The facility census was 209. Findings include: 1. Interview with Resident #90 on 08/04/25 at 9:53 A.M. revealed gnats and roaches were present in the facility on a daily basis. Interview and observation with Resident #57 on 08/04/25 at 9:51 A.M. revealed gnats were present in his room on a daily basis. Several gnats were observed flying around the room and landing on the privacy curtain. Interview and observation with Resident #70 on 08/04/25 at 10:13 A.M. revealed gnats were present in his room on a daily basis. He stated he told management about the gnats in his room. Several gnats were observed to be flying around the room and landing on Resident #70's tray table. Interview with Resident #116 on 08/04/25 at 10:32 A.M. revealed roaches were in her room on a daily basis and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents advance directives were readily available to facility staff and Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel. This affected four residents (#17, #129, #198, and #236) of the 51 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 209. Findings included: 1. Closed record review for Resident #236 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included dementia with severe psychotic disturbance, atrial fibrillation, and repeated falls. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #236 was severely impaired cognition. Review of the physician's order, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #235's code status was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A) and Do Not Intubate (DNI). Review of the facility's advance directive form, signed by Resident #236's son on [DATE], revealed the resident was to not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, guardian and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete quarterly care conferences for the residents. This affected eight (Residents #6, #18, #37, #53, #82, #110, #170, and #198) of 43 residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 209. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record review revealed an admission date of 10/06/23. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites, permanent atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the care conferences for Resident #6 revealed care conferences were held on 10/22/24 and 03/06/25. There were no care conferences held since 03/06/25. Interview on 08/06/25 at 11:32 A.M. with Social Service (SS) #751 and SS #771 confirmed there were only two care conferences on 10/22/24 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) adequate care and services for personal hygiene. This affected four (#8, #15, #134, and #209) of eight residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 209. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 06/02/25. Diagnoses included surgical amputation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, peripheral vascular disease, and end stage renal disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for showering/bathing, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #8's progress notes, shower/bathing sheets, and task information charting sheet for grooming from 07/01/25 to 08/05/25 revealed it did not indicate if staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide personal privacy to the residents. This affected one (Resident #48) of 51 residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 209. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 06/17/25. Diagnoses included post traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 had intact cognition. Observation of the door to Resident #48's room on 08/04/25 at 10:32 A.M. and 08/06/25 at 1:45 P.M. revealed the door to the Resident #48's room entrance would not close. Interview with Resident #48 on 08/04/25 at 10:45 A.M. stated she was upset that her door would not close because she wanted privacy at times. Review of ninety-days of maintenance work orders revealed there were no work orders to repair the door had been made. Interview with Maintenance #811 on 08/06/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident, guardian and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and homelike environment in resident rooms. This affected two (Resident #18 and #70) of seven residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility census was 209 residents.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #18 had been appointed a guardian on 01/13/25. Interview with the guardian for Resident #18 on 08/04/25 at 1:54 P.M. stated the sink in Resident #18's room had been leaking and the faucet that been loose since March 2025. She stated she had notified the facility of this concern and it has never been fixed. Observations on 08/04/25 at 2:48 P.M., 08/07/25 at 8:54 A.M. and 3:46 P.M., and on 08/11/25 at 8:26 A.M. revealed Resident #18's sink faucet was loose and dripping. The baseboard, approximately three feet in length, behind the toilet was separated from the wall, revealing a dark…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, policy review, and review of the facilities Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), the facility failed to timely report allegations of physical and verbal abuse and injuries of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency. This affected three (#6, #72, and #183) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 209. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites, permanent atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the nursing notes dated 12/23/24 documented an interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting regarding an incident of physical aggression received on 12/21/24. The resident was observed with a bleeding nose and stated, He punched me. All involved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of verbal and physical abuse and injuries of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated. This affected three (#6, #72 and #183) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 209. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #72 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, intellectual disabilities, and chronic pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the nursing progress note dated 06/27/25 revealed Resident #183 was cursing out Resident #72 calling her a 'fat expletive'. This nurse went to investigate the noise and Resident #183 called the nurse an expletive as well. Resident #183 cursing kept going on even when this nurse intervened. Resident #183 made Resident #72 cry. Review of the facilities investigation revealed it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain an audiology consult for a resident in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #46) of four residents reviewed for ancillary services. The facility census was 209.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 11/12/18. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dementia, and hearing loss. Review of Resident #46's care plan dated 06/05/19 revealed he had impaired communication related to mixed conductive and sensorineural bilateral hearing loss and that he wore hearing aids. Interventions listed was to check bilateral hearing aide placement and functioning and to refer to audiology for hearing consult. Review of Resident #46's audiology visit on 10/26/22 revealed he was recommended to wear daily hearing aids. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide residents who had contractures their splint devices as physician ordered. This affected two (Residents #144 and 209) of four residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility identified 19 residents with contractures. The facility census was 209. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #144 revealed an admission date of 03/27/17 . Diagnoses included paralytic syndrome, polyneuropathy, and contracture right hand and wrist 10/01/18. Review of the physician orders dated 11/12/22 revealed Resident #144 was to have a right palm protector applied between 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. for up to eight hours daily. Review of Resident #144’s care plan dated 10/20/23 and last updated 08/07/25 revealed Resident #144 had a functional ability deficit and required assistance with self-care related to his contracture of his right hand and wrist. A goal was to improve of maintain current level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough fall investigations, failed to ensure residents had adequate footwear to prevent accidents, and failed to appropriately secure the resident's smoking materials. This affected three (Residents #70, #84, and #110) of 12 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 209. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed a re-admission date of 12/20/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer’s disease with late onset, dementia, and osteopenia. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 was at risk for falls. Review of the plan of care dated 05/17/24 revealed Resident #84 was at risk for falls due to impaired cognition and mobility limitations. Interventions included providing adequate lighting, keeping call light and commonly used items within reach, placing the call light within reach and encouraging the resident to use it for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, policy review, and review of hospital records, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care for Resident #47 who had localized fly larvae infestation to her tracheostomy and stoma and required hospitalization. This affected one (#47) of five residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 36 residents residing on the tracheostomy unit. The facility census was 209. Findings included: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/23/24. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, tracheostomy and ventilator dependent. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #47 was also totally dependent on staff for all care including tracheostomy care. Review of the active physician orders revealed Resident #47 was to receive tracheostomy care every 12 hours which included changing of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently evaluate the effectiveness of regularly scheduled opioid pain medication in accordance with the resident's comprehensive care plan. This affected one (#159) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 209. Findings include:Review of Resident #159's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fibromyalgia (long-term condition that involves widespread body pain) and polyarthritis (a form of arthritis affecting five or more joints simultaneously, causing pain, swelling, warmth, and stiffness). Review of the physician order summary dated 03/04/25 revealed Resident #159 had an order for Tramadol (an opioid and treats moderate to severe pain) 50 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for polyarthritis. Review of the care plan dated 06/29/25 revealed Resident #159 was at risk for chronic pain and the interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to identify post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) triggers on the care plan for Resident #48 and failed to assess Resident #8 for PTSD upon admission. This affected two (Residents #8 and #48) of five residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 209.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 06/17/25. Diagnoses included PTSD, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact and did not have behaviors. Review of the social services evaluation dated 06/27/25 revealed Resident #48 had experienced a loss of a significant other and a traumatic event of a motor vehicle accident with mass casualties. Symptoms due to her PTSD included flashbacks, hypervigilance, fear, severe anxiety, loneliness and unwanted thoughts. Triggers included people,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored. This affected two of six medication carts observed. The facility identified 11 medication cart in the facility. This affected three residents (#33, #53, and #237). The facility census was 209.Findings include:1. Observation of the 500-hall medication cart on 08/07/25 at 9:30 A.M. revealed an unopened bottle of Chlorhexidine (a topical antiseptic) labeled for Resident #33 with the expiration date of February 2025.Interview with Unit Manager #110 on 08/07/25 at 9:32 A.M. verified the Chlorhexidine was expired.2. Observation of 400-hall medication cart on 08/07/25 at 10:00 A.M. revealed a vial of Novolin 70/30 (insulin) with an open date of 06/27/25 for Resident #237. There was also a Lantus (insulin) pen without an open date for Resident #53.Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #530 on 08/07/25 at 10:02 A.M. verified the vial of Novolin 70/30 should have been discarded after 30 days. LPN #530 added Resident #237 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in designated resident rooms. This affected one (Resident #10) of four residents reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 209. Findings included:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 07/15/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #10's physician orders for 08/01/25 to 08/11/25 revealed an active order for Resident #10 to be on EBP related to chronic wound. Observation on 08/05/25 at 2:40 P.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #115 assisting Resident #10 at the bedside with gloves on. He went into the resident's bathroom and exited out of the room with gloved hands. CNA #115 was not wearing a gown during provision of care. Interview on 08/05/25 at 2:42 P.M. with CNA #115 confirmed he performed incontinence care for Resident #10 with gloves only. CNA #115 confirmed he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the call light was positioned within reach of a resident. This affected one (#15) of 51 residents observed for call light placement. The facility census was 209. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had impaired cognitive function and required substantial, maximal assistance with mobility. Review of Resident #15's plan of care, dated 06/02/25, revealed Resident #15 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) functional deficit, and required substantial to maximal assistance with all self-care. Interventions for Resident #15 included encourage the resident to use bell/call light to call for assistance. Observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to monitor bruising and bleeding risk for a resident on an anticoagulant. This affected one resident (Resident #45) out of three residents reviewed for anticoagulant medications, and had the potential to affect 48 residents that the facility identified as being on anticoagulant medication. The facility census was 205 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, mood disorder, anemia, anxiety disorder and heart failure. Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 15, indicative of intact cognition. Review of her MDS also revealed that she was receiving anticoagulant medication. Review of Resident #45's physician orders revealed that effective 01/18/25, she had physician orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate or assess a resident after a significant weight gain. This affected one resident (Resident #208) out of four residents reviewed for weight changes. The facility census was 205 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #208 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, encounter for tracheostomy, intracerebral hemorrhage, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, dysphagia, and hemiparesis. Review of Resident #208's nutrition care plan dated 11/05/24 revealed he was at risk for nutritional decline. An intervention was to observe and evaluate weight and weight changes. Review of Resident #208's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 02/20/25 revealed that he was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #208's weight record revealed that he weighed 169.1 pounds (lbs) on 03/06/25 and he weighed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, review of admission checklists and review of facility policy, the facility failed to reconcile admission orders with a resident's previous medication orders to provide required eye drops per resident's expectations and physician orders. This affected one resident (Resident #156) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 205 residents. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #156 was admitted on [DATE] readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, status post cadaver - donor kidney transplant, dependence on renal dialysis, congestive heart failure, presence of cardiac pacemaker, immunodeficiency due to drugs, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, depression, chronic pain, and sarcoidosis. Review of the physician orders dated 03/23/25, prior to the hospitalization, revealed Resident #156 was to receive Brimonidine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to monitor side effects of a resident on antipsychotic medications. This affected one resident (Resident #106) out of three residents reviewed for antipsychotic medications, and had the potential to affect 47 residents that the facility identified as being on antipsychotic medication. The facility census was 205 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease, schizophrenia, hypothyroidism, dementia, and drug induced dyskinesia. Review of Resident #106's care plan dated 05/08/19 revealed that she was at risk for adverse reaction and side effects related to receiving psychotropic medication due to the resident taking an antipsychotic for schizophrenia. Interventions included observing for side effects related to taking antipsychotic medications such as sedation, headaches, dizziness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of a facility self reported incident, review of facility investigation, review of hospital records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #145) was free from physical abuse in the facility. The deficient practice affected one (Resident #145) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 204. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #145 revealed an admission date of 02/01/21. Diagnoses included fracture of nasal bones (01/14/25), hemiplegia affecting unspecified side, personal history of traumatic brain injury, difficulty in walking, other seizures, and unspecified mental disorder due to a known physiological condition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/24, revealed Resident #145 had intact cognition. The resident required minimal assistance which varied from independent to supervision from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The resident exhibited physical and other behaviors toward others one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of a facility self reported incident, review of the facility investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of physical abuse of one resident (Resident #145). The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #145) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 204. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #145 revealed an admission date of 02/01/21. Diagnoses included fracture of nasal bones (01/14/25), hemiplegia affecting unspecified side, personal history of traumatic brain injury, difficulty in walking, other seizures, and unspecified mental disorder due to a known physiological condition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/24, revealed Resident #145 had intact cognition. The resident required minimal assistance which varied from independent to supervision from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The resident exhibited physical and other behaviors toward…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely notification to the physician or Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) of abnormal laboratory values for Resident #37. This affected one (Resident #37) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 215. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #215 revealed an admission date of 10/22/24. Medical diagnoses included chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and encounter for adjustment and management of automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator. Review of Resident #215's hospital discharge notes dated 10/22/24 revealed the resident had a scheduled visit with the cardiologist on 11/06/24. The hospital indicated he had recommended outpatient testing which included obtaining a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) and magnesium level in three to five days. Review of Resident #215's physician orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to appropriately investigate a resident incident. This affected one (Resident #301) of three resident incidents reviewed. The census was 219. Findings Include: Resident #301 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, asthma, acute respiratory failure, hypotension, atrial fibrillation, anemia, vascular dementia, congestive heart failure, epilepsy, dorsalgia, alcohol abuse, diverticulitis, suicidal ideation, hydronephrosis, restlessness and agitation, nicotine dependence, sleep apnea, polyneuropathy, and depression. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/28/24, revealed he had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #301 progress notes and fall investigation, dated 10/05/24, revealed he had an unwitnessed fall while in the facility. Because he had an unwitnessed fall, the facility started neurological checks. Review of the neurological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#11) attended a scheduled medical appointment out of the facility out of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 210. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 03/12/22. Diagnoses included but were not limited to demyelinating disease of central nervous system, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy status, and quadriplegia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require total dependence on all aspects of care. Review of Resident #11's After Visit Summary from Ohio Health dated 08/06/24 at 9:30 A.M. revealed an appointment for 08/21/24 at 10:00 A.M. with Ohio Health Neuroscience. Further review of Resident #11's medical record revealed no record of the 08/21/24 10:00 A.M. appointment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to provide care and supervision to prevent residents from eloping from the facility. This affected one (Resident #10) of ten facility-identified residents at risk for elopement. The facility census was 202. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/20/23 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type two diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] following an elopement from the facility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 12/20/23 revealed resident was cognitively impaired. Review of the preadmission hospital records for Resident #10 dated 11/27/23 revealed resident was diagnosed with acute encephalopathy, possible multi-infarct dementia and metabolic encephalopathy from hypoglycemia. Further review of the hospital records revealed Resident #10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident room was maintained in a homelike manner. This affected two (Resident #3 and Resident #4) of five resident rooms reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility census was 206. Findings include: Observation on 11/15/23 at 1:30 P.M. of Resident #3 and Resident #4's room revealed the wood paneling floor next to Resident #4's bed was chipped and the surface underneath the wood paneling floor was exposed. Observation on 11/15/23 at 1:30 P.M. of Resident #3 and Resident #4's bathroom revealed the floor in the bathroom had an approximately two-foot crack in it. Additionally, the flooring had bubbled up around the edges of the bathroom and had turned gray in spots which was not the natural color of the floor. Interview on 11/15/23 at 1:30 P.M. with Resident #3 revealed the bathroom floor appeared as though it needed to be replaced. Interview on 11/15/23 at 1:41 P.M. with Director of Maintenance #321 verified the wood paneling floor next to Resident #4's bed was chipped and the surface…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, self reported incident (SRI) review, and policy review, the facility failed to properly store controlled substances. This affected one resident (Resident #20) out of the one resident reviewed for controlled substance storage. The facility census was 201. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20, revealed an admission date of 03/07/22. Diagnoses included: metabolic encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, centrilobular emphysema and restlessness and agitation. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance with two person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, and extensive assistance with one-person physical assistance with toilet use and dressing. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #20 was ordered lorazapam (Ativan) one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-27 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Section C for assessing a resident's cognition and mood were assessed in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment. This affected six (Residents #77, #151, #57, #406, #15, and #25) of six residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 207. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 01/31/22 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, paraplegia, neurogenic bowel, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, panic disorder, major depression, and polyneuropathy. Review of Resident #77's quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed all areas in Section C (Cognition) and Section D (Mood) were marked as 'not assessed.' 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #151 revealed an admission date of 06/10/22 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease with dependence on dialysis, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #12's dignity was maintained by ensuring she had clothes available to her. This affected one (Resident #12) of one resident reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 207. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, multiple sclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had intact cognition and required the extensive assistance of two persons for dressing. Observation on 04/24/23 at 12:30 P.M. and 3:30 P.M. revealed Resident #12 in her bedroom, she was in a hospital gown. Observation on 04/25/23 at 8:30 A.M. revealed Resident #12 in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and manual review the facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessment. This affected one (Resident #100) out of three residents reviewed for resident assessments. Facility census was 207. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short term therapy and skilled nursing services. Resident #100 was discharged from the facility on 12/01/22. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for Resident #100 revealed an entry MDS was completed on 11/18/22 and an admission MDS was completed on 11/25/22. There was no discharge MDS completed. Interview on 04/26/23 at 11:36 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #419 confirmed Resident #100 did not have a discharge MDS completed. Review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual revised October 2019 Chapter two, Assessments for the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), revealed, Discharge Assessment refers to an assessment required on resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete quarterly care conferences. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated to reflect current advanced directives. This affected one (Resident #81) of one reviewed for care planning advanced directives. The facility's census was 207. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility [DATE] with the diagnoses of Parkinson's, unspecified atrial fibrillation, dementia, hypertension, fibromyalgia, and osteoporosis. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 was cognitively intact and had no behaviors. Resident #44 required extensive assistance with dressing and personal hygiene and supervision for all other activities of daily living. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #159's preferred activities were available to him. This affected one (Resident #159) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility's census was 207. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #159 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four, systolic heart failure, alcohol abuse, colostomy, and retention of urine. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #159 had severely impaired cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers Review of the plan of care dated 06/03/22 revealed Resident #159 had a potential for impaired social interaction or social isolation related to impaired cognition and physical limitations. He enjoyed watching activities, movies inside his own room, and happy hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure residents secured their smoking contraband. This affected one (Resident #25) out of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 207. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 11/15/22 and the diagnoses of schizophrenia, disorganized schizophrenia, and nicotine dependence. Review of the care plan dated 11/16/22 revealed Resident #25 wished to use smoking products and has been assessed as being safe to smoke with supervision and the resident had episodes of choosing not to follow the facility smoking policy and being resistive to turning over smoking materials. Interventions included to assess her ability to smoke safely per facility policy, educate the resident on the smoking policy, the resident is independent with managing smoking materials and accessing the lock box, and staff will maintain all smoking paraphernalia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, review of the facility policy, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #406's nephrostomy bag was in the proper position at all times to prevent backflow of urine into the bladder. This affected one (Resident #406) of two residents reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 207. Findings include: Review of Resident #406's medical record revealed Resident #406 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease with dependence on dialysis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of the physician order dated 04/11/23 revealed Resident #406 had a nephrostomy tube to her right flank. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #406 had mildly impaired cognition and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the plan of care dated 04/17/23 revealed Resident #406 was at risk for urinary tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Federal Drug Administration Approving Labeling Text, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive an antipsychotic medication without an appropriate diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #83) of five residents reviewed unnecessary medication. The facility census was 207. Findings include: Record review for Resident #83 revealed Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety, major depression disorder, and chronic pain. The resident's diagnosis list did not include bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #83's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/03/23 for Depakote 125 milligrams (mg) administered three times per day for agitation. Review of the psychiatric progress note dated 01/17/23 revealed Resident #83 was on Depakote 125 milligrams (mg) for bipolar disorder. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #400 confirmed the physician order for Resident #83 of Depakote 125 milligrams (mg) for agitation. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (%). There were five medication errors out of 28 opportunities resulting in a 17.86% medication error rate. This affected two (Resident #34 and #131) of four residents observed during medication pass. The facility census was 207. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #131 revealed an admission date of 07/09/19. Diagnoses included gait abnormalities, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the physician orders revealed on 12/14/20, Resident #131 was ordered Senna Plus Docusate Sodium 8.6-50 milligrams (mg) with instructions to give one tablet daily for constipation. Review of the care plan dated 07/18/19 revealed Resident #131 was at risk for constipation related to decreased mobility with interventions to administer medications as ordered and observe for ineffectiveness/side effects. Observation and interview on 04/25/23 at 9:51 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #159's activity participation was recorded accurately and by the staff who initiated it. This affected one (Residents #159) of 39 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 207. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #159 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, systolic heart failure and retention of urine. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #159 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the April 2023 activity documentation report downloaded on 04/25/23 at 3:50 P.M. revealed Resident #159 was listed as conversing with others on 04/04/23, 04/18/23, 04/24/23, and 04/25/23. Resident #159 was listed as watching television or movies on 04/04/23, 04/18/23, 04/24/23, and 04/25/23. No other activities were documented. On 04/27/23 at 4:27 P.M. Activities Director #571 provided an April 2023 activity documentation report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was disposed of properly after providing care for Resident #179, who had Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in her wound. This affected one (Resident #179) of one resident under transmission-based precautions. The facility census was 207. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #179 revealed an admission date of 09/13/22 with diagnoses including cellulitis of left lower limb, peripheral vascular disease, and open wound to the left lower leg. Review of the physician order dated 04/06/23 revealed Resident #179 had an order for contact isolation for MRSA in the wound. Interview on 04/24/23 at 10:25 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #451 revealed Resident #179 was under contact isolation for a wound to her feet and those providing care to the resident required personal protective equipment (PPE) including a gown. Observation on 04/24/23 at 10:30 A.M. revealed Resident #179 had no biohazard containers in her room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn when providing care for residents who tested positive for COVID-19 to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect 33 residents (#37, #93, #125, #10, #178, #156, #153, #98, #56, #136, #161, #127, #3, #59, #101, #84, #14, #11, #114, #139, #15, #38, #103, #55, #130, #137, #108, #163, #33, #42, #120, #106 and #121) who resided on the 300 unit (non-COVID unit) who received care from Registered Nurse (RN) #213. The facility census was 185. Finding include: The facility identified seven residents, Resident #7, #159, #83, #138, #4, #71, and #85 who resided on the facility dedicated COVID-19 unit and who were in isolation for COVID-19 at the time of the survey. On 11/02/22 at 12:02 P.M. observation of the 300 unit revealed a portion of the unit had been converted into a dedicated COVID-19 unit. A section of the unit contained a set of double doors which were closed with signs posed. The signage included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #146 was provided the opportunity to participate in decisions regarding the continued use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#146) of the three residents who were reviewed for urinary catheters or urinary tract infections. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, end stage renal disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, dependence on renal dialysis and legal blindness. Review of the facility Nursing Comprehensive Evaluation, dated 09/20/22 revealed the resident was assessed to have an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter. Review of the a certified nurse practitioner (CNP) progress note, dated 09/22/22 revealed the resident had little urine and self catheterized. Nursing to provide catheterization supplies and resident to self catheterize every eight hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #164 was not physically restrained for staff convenience. This affected one resident (#164) of the two residents reviewed for physical restraints. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #164 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, major depressive disorder, unspecified fall, muscle wasting, mild cognitive impairment and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/05/22 revealed the resident exhibited moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 (out of 15). This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility and transfers and extensive assistance from one staff member for toileting and walking. This assessment did not note the use of any type of restraints. On 10/31/22 at 10:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #116 was referred for a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment following a significant change in status and new mental health diagnoses. This affected one resident (#116) of five residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed an initial admission date 12/08/20 and a re-entry date of 01/21/22. Resident #116 had current diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety, suicidal ideation's, schizoaffective disorder, and psychosis. Review of Resident #116's PASARR, dated 12/03/20 revealed under Section D: Indications of Serious Mental Illness, Mood Disorder was the only diagnosis noted in this section. The PASARR Determination letter revealed, Not Applicable. Review of Resident #116's care plan, dated 12/08/20 and revised 08/03/22 revealed Resident #116 had potential for fluctuations in mood related to diagnoses of major depressive anxiety, insomnia, schizophrenia, psychosis, impulsive at times. Interventions include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to timely complete a Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #147 at the time of admission. This affected one resident (#147) of five residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hallucinations, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, suicide attempt, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Identification Screen revealed the screen had not been completed until 05/13/22, almost six months after the resident was admitted to the facility. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/08/22 revealed the resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 14 out of 15. The assessment revealed the resident required limited assistance from one staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure timely follow up appointments were scheduled to promote an optimal continuum of care for Resident #23 and Resident #174. The facility also failed to ensure preventative skin interventions were provided as ordered for Resident #33. This affected three residents (#23, #33 and #174) of 37 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, repeated falls, schizoaffective disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy, altered mental status, bipolar disorder and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the nursing progress note, dated 09/29/22 revealed staff alerted the nurse Resident #23 was on the floor. The resident was observed to be laying on his right side with a cane near the resident. The resident stated he became lightheaded sometimes and while ambulating in the hall lowered himself to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure interventions related to contracture management were in place for Resident #39, Resident #77 and Resident #158 as ordered. This affected three residents (#39, #77 and #158) of four residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an initial admission date of 08/15/22 with the latest readmission date of 09/30/22 and diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia, aphonia, dysphagia, muscle wasting and atrophy, sepsis, heart failure, cerebral palsy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, metabolic encephalopathy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, hyperlipidemia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia and dependence on ventilator. Review of the nursing comprehensive evaluation dated 08/15/22 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with contractures and had a diagnoses of quadriplegia. Review of the monthly physician's orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of dialysis communication forms, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure accurate dialysis communication was communicated between the facility and dialysis center for Resident #126. This affected one resident (#126) of two residents reviewed for hemodialysis. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #126 revealed an admission date on 10/20/21 with medical diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, chronic viral hepatitis C, and acquired absences of left leg above the knee and right toe(s). Review of the care plan, dated 10/20/21 (and revised 11/04/22) revealed Resident #126 was at risk for complications related to dialysis. Interventions included the facility would utilize the Dialysis Communication form to communicate with the dialysis center. Send the dialysis communication book to the dialysis center with each appointment. Upon return from the dialysis center review the communication book including any progress notes. Provide an update to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$114,649 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $103,669 — penalty dated 2025-08-13
  • $10,980 — penalty dated 2024-11-26
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-10 for 62 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAUREL OHIO OPERATIONS GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2018
LAUREL HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2018
LAUREL ACQUISITION HOLDING CORPORATIONOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2018
KHAN, ANISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2018
LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
MASON, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SLAYBAUGH, RANDALLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
STOBB, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 33%Medicare 1%Other / private 66%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$347per resident / day
operating cost
$10,562per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365379. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next