No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Laurels Of Heath

717 South 30th Street, Heath, OH 43056 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (740) 522-1171 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 522-1171 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 20251 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
607 Hebron Rd Ste B · (740) 788-8166 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
764 Hebron Rd · (740) 522-6523 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
659 S 30th St · (740) 522-1750 · Call to confirm hours
Park
135 Partridge Ct · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.3%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.9%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.4%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.2%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.0%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.7%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.541.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.181.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.6%CMS range 38.1–66.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.0–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.2–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
37.8%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 107.4 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-15)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-10-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed resident record review, review of a facility medication error report, review of pharmacy labels, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error. This affected one (#105) of three residents reviewed for medication errors. Actual Harm occurred on 09/30/25 for Resident #105, when a nurse crushed and administered an extended release Morphine (narcotic pain medication) tablet to the resident, while also administering double the ordered dose of prescribed Lyrica (anticonvulsant analgesic) to the resident, resulting in the need to administer Narcan (opioid reversal agent) to the resident to reverse the effects of a drug overdose and to be evaluated at the local emergency department (ED), after the overdose occurred. Findings include: Review of Resident #105's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic pain syndrome, opioid dependence, low back pain, Barret's Esophagus (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to privacy when staff took a picture of the resident without consent. This affected one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 02/15/23 with diagnoses including paraplegia, seizure, severe-protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertensive without heart failure, insomnia, amaurosis fugax, dilated cardiomyopathy, and anxiety disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Additionally, the MDS revealed Resident #42 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) to include showering and bathing. Furthermore, Resident #42 was dependent on staff to move from side to side in bed.Interview on 01/29/26 at 8:16 A.M. with Resident #42 revealed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) took a picture of his naked back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA). This affected one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 107. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 02/15/23 with diagnoses including paraplegia, seizure, severe-protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertensive without heart failure, insomnia, amaurosis fugax, dilated cardiomyopathy, and anxiety disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Additionally, the MDS revealed Resident #42 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) to include showering and bathing. Furthermore, Resident #42 was dependent on staff to move from side to side in bed.Interview on 01/29/26 at 8:16 A.M. with Resident #42 revealed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) took a picture of his naked back without his consent. Interview on 01/29/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation when informed of staff taking a photo of a resident without consent. This affected one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 107. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 02/15/23 with diagnoses including paraplegia, seizure, severe-protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertensive without heart failure, insomnia, amaurosis fugax, dilated cardiomyopathy, and anxiety disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Additionally, the MDS revealed Resident #42 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) to include showering and bathing. Furthermore, Resident #42 was dependent on staff to move from side to side in bed.Interview on 01/29/26 at 8:16 A.M. with Resident #42 revealed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) took a picture of his naked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal/ emotional abuse was reported to the State survey agency as required. This affected one (Resident #14) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain did not function properly due to an underlying metabolic disturbance causing cognitive impairment, changes in behaviors, and other neurological symptoms), Bipolar disorder, malignant neoplasm of the uterus, adult failure to thrive, and depression. Review of Resident #14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any vision or hearing problems and had clear speech. She was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. She was cognitively intact and was not noted to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of potential verbal/ emotional abuse was investigated by the facility when reported to management staff. This affected one (Resident #14) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain did not function properly due to an underlying metabolic disturbance causing cognitive impairment, changes in behaviors, and other neurological symptoms), Bipolar disorder, malignant neoplasm of the uterus, adult failure to thrive, and depression. Review of Resident #14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any vision or hearing problems and had clear speech. She was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. She was cognitively intact and was not noted to have any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to label Tuberculin (TB) solution (Tubersol) multi-use vials with a date when opened for use. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 112 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 112.Findings Include:1. An observation on 09/11/25 at 7:45 A.M. in the medication refrigerator in the Unit Three medication storage room revealed an opened multi-use vial of Tuberculin solution. There was no date on the vial or on the packaging box to reflect when the vial had been opened for use. The vial expiration was 04/2026.An interview on 09/11/25 at 7:47 A.M. with Medication Technician (MT) #339 confirmed the opened vial of Tuberculin solution without a date reflecting when the vial was opened for use. MT #339 stated the vial should be removed from use and discarded.2. An observation on 09/11/25 at 7:55 A.M. in the refrigerator in the Unit Two medication storage room revealed an opened multi-use vial of Tuberculin solution. There was no date on the vial or on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility infection tracking and monitoring records, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly monitor and address patterns and trends of known infections. This had the potential to affect all 112 residents in the facility. The census was 112. Findings Include:Review of the facility infection control log, dated June 2025, revealed there were two urinary tract infections on one hallway and 12 total skin infections throughout the facility, including three in one unit and three on a separate unit. Review of facility infection control log, dated July 2025, revealed two fungal infections on one unit, two osteomyelitis infections on another unit, three skin infections on a third unit, and two more fungal infections on a fourth unit. Review of facility infection control log, dated August 2025, revealed three urinary tract infections, two of which the organism was extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), in one unit, and two respiratory infections in a separate unit. Review of facility infection control logs and documentation, dated June 2025 to August 2025, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of cleaning schedules, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an clean and homelike environment. This deficient practice affected four (#3, #60, #93, and #105) of 112 residents observed for homelike environment. The facility census was 112.Findings Include:An observation on 09/08/25 at 10:30 A.M. revealed Resident #3 lying in bed with the bed covers pulled up to cover lower body. There were several dark brown stains noted on the white window blinds which were in the half-open position.An observation on 09/08/25 at 2:21 P.M. revealed Resident #93's room had cobwebs located in the corners where the wall met the ceiling and in the windowsill. The floor was dirty with noted stains along the baseboard under the heating and cooling unit and under the three-drawer dresser beside the bed. Further observation revealed Resident #93's fitted and flat sheets were noted to be soiled with dark brown stains near the edge of the bed.An observation on 09/08/25 at 2:30 P.M. revealed Resident #105 sitting in his wheelchair completing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to allow a resident to choose to eat a diet texture of their preference when the resident's diet was downgraded without appropriate tests or evaluations completed. This affected one (#49) of one residents reviewed for choices. The census was 112. Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart failure, type II diabetes, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, old myocardial infarction, nicotine dependence, and non-compliance with other medical treatment and regimen. Review of Resident #49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/02/25, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #49's After Visit Summary Hospital form, dated 01/04/24, revealed he was admitted to the hospital for teeth extraction and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had an appropriate diagnosis for use of an antipsychotic medication and failed to provide proper justification for not attempting a gradual dose reduction for a resident's psychotropic medication. This affected two (#118 and #4) of six residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 112.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #118 revealed an admission date of 09/03/25 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, interstitial pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and acute kidney failure.Review of the physician orders for Resident #118 revealed an order dated 09/03/25 for olanzapine (antipsychotic medication) oral tablet five (5) milligram (mg) to be given one time a day at bedtime for anxiety.Interview on 09/10/25 at 2:13 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #311 confirmed Resident #118's diagnosis for olanzapine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with personal hygiene for a resident who was dependent for care. This deficient practice affected one (#63) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 112.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 07/11/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to heart disease, depression, seizures, and intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #63 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out possible 15, and required moderate to dependent assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLs) tasks including personal hygiene and shaving of facial hair.Review of Resident #63's functional ability deficit care plan dated 06/06/24 revealed assistance from staff was required to complete personal hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of census information, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide meaningful activities per resident preference. This affected one (#86) of four residents reviewed for activities. The census was 112.Findings include:Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/23/10 with diagnosis including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, suicidal ideations, schizophrenia, and visual and auditory hallucinations. Review of Resident #86 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident with intact cognition.Review of an activity plan of care created 02/25/20, and revised 09/09/23, revealed Resident #86 preferred to engage in activities independently. He preferred to stay in his room and sleep. He wears a headset to keep out noise, and will walk in the halls in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement splint/brace program for a resident with bilateral hand contractures. This deficient practice affected one (#47) of two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility census was 112.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an initial admission date 02/08/23 and a re-admission date 03/14/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, suicidal behavior, and contractures.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of two out of possible 15. Resident #47 was dependent on staff for care, bathing, and transfers. Resident #47 was able to feed self, but preferred staff to assist with eating.Review of Resident #47's nutritional care plan dated 02/09/23 revealed Resident #47 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of fall investigations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions and properly address repeated non-compliance with interventions to prevent resident falls. This deficient practice affected one (#14) of four residents reviewed for falls and accidents. The facility census was 112.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for the Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 06/12/06. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, anxiety disorder, and glaucoma.Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/17/25, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 07/31/25 revealed Resident #14 was at risk for fall related injury and falls due to a history of falls and his requirements for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interventions included to keep the resident's call light within reach so he can call for assistance with transferring and to wear non-skid footwear when he was not in bed. Review of the plan of care dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly assess a resident prior to making a diet order change, and failed to properly, accurately, and timely obtain resident weights and notify the physician of weight changes as ordered. This affected three (#49, #2, and #9) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 112. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart failure, type II diabetes, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, old myocardial infarction, nicotine dependence, and non-compliance with other medical treatment and regimen. Review of Resident #49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/02/25, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #49's After Visit Summary Hospital form, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide/offer timely dental services to residents as needed. This affected two (#49 and #6) of four residents reviewed for dental services. The census was 112. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart failure, type II diabetes, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, old myocardial infarction, nicotine dependence, and non-compliance with other medical treatment and regimen. Review of Resident #49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/02/25, revealed he was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #49's dental progress notes, dated 01/19/24, confirmed Resident #24 was edentulous from a medical procedure that occurred earlier in the month at the hospital. The note also revealed they would complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement restorative programs following completion of therapy services as recommended. This affected one (#11) of two residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 112. Findings Include:Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 08/19/24 with a re-admission date 05/24/25. Diagnoses including but were not limited to orthopedic care, fracture of the left femur, high blood pressure, spinal stenosis, and dementia.Review of Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of a possible 15, and was independent with ambulation, transfers, and personal hygiene. Resident #11 had a history of falls.Review of Resident #11's progress notes dated 05/19/25 at 8:16 A.M. revealed Resident #11 reported to the day shift nurse during morning medication administration that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, review of pest control records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This deficient practice affected three (#3, #52, and #93) of 112 residents observed for environment and pest control. The facility census was 112.Findings Include:An observation on 09/08/25 at 10:15 A.M. revealed Resident #105 sitting at edge of the bed looking out the window. There were multiple house flies noted on the windowsill and bed covers.An observation on 09/08/25 at 11:25 A.M. revealed Resident #52 sitting in a wheelchair in her room awaiting lunch meal service. There were several house flies observed in the room. Resident #52 would occasionally swat at one house fly as it flew around her face.An observation on 09/08/25 at 2:21 P.M. revealed Resident #3 resting in bed with the bed covers pulled up to his chest area. There were multiple house flies on the bed covers and windowsill.An observation on 09/09/25 at 11:00 A.M. revealed Resident #3 sitting up in bed with the bed covers pulled up to cover…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain toilet rails, thresholds, walls, floors and dressers. This affected six (Resident's #2, #3, #4, #5 #8, and #9) of 117 residents in the facility.Findings include:Observations 07/09/25 between 9:33 A.M. and 10:27 A.M. revealed:- Resident #3's bathroom toilet had handrails attached to the bolts that held the toilet seat on the toilet. The rails moved when touched. The right railed moved approximately six inches and the left rail four inches. The toilet water was a milky pink color. The bathroom had an incontinence odor. The door frames entering the room and bathroom were scraped heavily with the paint off. The sink bowl was dirty a rusty color. There were seven broken tiles on the bathroom walls.- The community shower room between three and four the handrails attached to the toilet moved two to four inches when touched. There was molding off the wall between on the right exiting the shower. The linoleum type tile blocks at the threshold of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure call bells were within reach. This affected three (Resident's #1, #3 and #4) of six residents observed. The census was 117.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphasia, and osteoarthritis.Review of Resident #3's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had severely impaired cognition. He was independent of eating and required supervision or touching assistance for toilet transfers.Observation 07/09/25 at 10:10 A.M. of Resident #3 revealed the resident was in bed without a call bell/light near him. The call bell was plugged in the wall side of bed one and hanging on the floor. The resident was in bed two. There was not a call bell plugged into the wall on the bed two side. There was not a call bell in sight in the room for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of job description the facility failed to ensure the social worker assisted the resident to address his preferences of transferring to a different facility. This affected one resident (#2) of one residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 117.Findings include:Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/15/23 and diagnoses including paraplegia, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, generalized anxiety, and chronic respiratory failure.Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #2's care conference note dated 08/15/24 revealed the resident wanted to transfer to a facility in Cleveland or [NAME]. The resident's mother was to research the facilities and report to the social worker.Review of Resident #2's care conference note dated 11/13/24 revealed the resident wanted to go to a facility in [NAME]. The social worker was to search…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided drinking water. This affected three (Resident's #1, #3 and #4) of five residents observed for water availability. The census was 117.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphasia, and osteoarthritis.Review of Resident #3's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had severely impaired cognition. He was independent of eating and required supervision or touching assistance for toilet transfers.Observation 07/09/25 at 10:10 A.M. of Resident #3 revealed the resident was in bed without water or beverages on his overbed table or available in the room.Interview 07/09/25 at 10:10 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #15 verified the resident did not have water in reach. LPN #15 asked him if he wanted water and he said yes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on interview, observation medical record review, review of facility policy, and review of facility investigation, the facility failed to ensure Resident #127 did not elope from the facility for an extended period of time. This affected one resident (#127) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of Resident #127's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/06/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cachexia, panic disorder, depression, dementia, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #127's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #127's plan of care initiated 06/11/24 revealed the resident was at risk for exit seeking and elopement related to impaired cognition, enjoying being outside and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on a Facility-Reported Incident (FRI) review, medical record review, facility investigation review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure money was timely returned to the resident or resident representative to prevent misappropriation. This affected one resident (Resident #135) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 128. Findings Include: Review of Resident #135's medical record revealed admission date of [DATE] and discharge date [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, heart attack, kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and adult failure to thrive. Resident #135 required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. Resident #135 had intact cognition with a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment used for sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), mask and tubing were cleaned routinely. This affected one resident (Resident #133) of three residents reviewed for use of respiratory care. The facility census was 128. Findings Include: Review of Resident #133's medical record revealed admission date 09/15/22 and discharge date [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified dementia, spina bifida, sleep apnea, depression and anxiety. Resident #133 required staff assistance to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks related to having bilateral lower extremity impairment and used a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #133 had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15 and Resident #133 used oxygen therapy and used a non-invasive ventilator (CPAP) for breathing assistance while sleeping. dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to store resident food properly in the unit refrigerator on Unit 3. This had the potential to affect all of the residents on Unit 3 (17 residents on J Hall and 23 residents on K Hall). The facility census was 116. Findings include: Observation on 10/17/24 at 4:55 P.M. revealed that the Unit 3 refrigerator for resident food storage contained one container of unlabeled and undated food. Spillage was observed on the walls and floors of the Unit 3 refrigerator. A pool of orange liquid was observed on the bottle right of the fridge, and a soaked rag was on top of the orange liquid. On the left side of the fridge, the bottom drawer contained a pool of clear liquid. A soggy undated sandwich in a sandwich bag was observed floating in a pool of clear liquid, along with one health shake and one milk carton. The health shake carton and milk carton were observed to be soft and wet to the touch. Interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #235 on 10/17/24 at 5:00 P.M. confirmed that the unit 3 refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, interview, the facility failed to provide dignity in dining for Resident #37 while being assisted with her lunch meal. This affected one resident (Resident #37) out of three residents reviewed for meal assistance. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to facility on 12/22/15 with diagnoses that included Alzheimers dementia, heart failure, and glaucoma. Her diet order as of 08/23/23 was regular diet, pureed texture with thin liquids. Review of Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 08/01/24 revealed that Resident #37 required supervision and or touch assistance for eating. Review of Resident #37's care plan dated 08/12/19 and revised on 08/13/24 revealed that Resident #37 received assistance with eating from nursing staff as needed. Observations on 10/17/24 from 12:35 P.M. to 12:52 P.M. revealed that Resident #37 did not immediately initiate feeding herself her meal. On 10/17/24 at 12:53 P.M., Resident #37 was observed dipping her fork into her milk, then dipping her fork into her water, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of the wound nurse practitioner (NP) progress notes, and interviews the facility failed to ensure wound notes were accurately documented to reflect current treatment orders for skin alterations. This affected one resident (#1) of three record reviewed. Findings included: 1. a. Closed medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility initially on 03/07/24 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy, embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of left upper extremity, acute respiratory failure, quadriplegia, dependence on respirator, and Raynaud's. Review of Resident #1's Wound NP #500's progress note dated 07/26/24 revealed new orders to cleanse the right scapula wound with 3% acetic acid. Review of Resident #1's orders revealed no evidence 3% acetic acid was ordered to cleanse the wound. Interview on 09/10/24 at 4:35 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Wound Licensed Practical Nurse (WLPN) #224 revealed the facility never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and effective water management program to identify areas in facility at risk for Legionella growth. This affected one resident (#122), who contracted Legionella while residing in the facility and had the potential to affect all 120 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 120. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #122 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, dependence on respirator, chronic bronchitis, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, acute embolism and thrombosis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, edema, dysphagia, hypertension, pleural effusion, anemia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, sepsis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, bradycardia, Raynauds' syndrome, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), osteoarthritis, and other psychoactive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for personal care received the assistance they needed to be bathed/ showered as scheduled and as per their preference. This affected three residents (#4, #15, and #64) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) assistance. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic pain, osteoarthritis, and unsteadiness on his feet. A review of Resident #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. He was not known to display any behaviors or reject care during the seven days of the assessment period. A bathing activity was not indicated to have occurred during the seven days of the assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a rationale was provided when the physician declined the pharmacist's recommendation. This affected four (#14, #39, #51, and #114) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #39's diagnoses included hemiplegia, aphasia, type two diabetes, gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD), depression, unspecified atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety, and bells palsy. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/28/23, revealed Resident #39 had mild cognitive impairment and received insulin. Review of Resident #39's pharmacy recommendation, dated 04/13/23, revealed Resident #39 frequently required insulin per sliding scale and Resident #39's most recent hemoglobin A1C was eight percent on 01/11/23. Resident #39 also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of menu spreadsheets, observation, staff interview, and review of a diet list, the facility failed to ensure residents on a mechanical soft diet and no added salt diet received meals according to the menu. This affected 34 (Residents #1, #2, #4, #6, #14, #19, #22, #27, #31, #32, #33, #37, #38, #39, #49, #50, #52, #54, #58, #60, #61, #64, #66, #68, #70, #71, #75, #88, #97, #105, #109, #227, #275, #328) of 34 residents who were on a mechanical soft diet and/or no added salt diet. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of the menu spreadsheet for the lunch meal on 01/10/24 revealed residents on a mechanical soft diet were supposed to receive ground sweet and sour chicken, fluffy steamed rice, seasoned carrots, a croissant, and sherbet. Residents on a no added salt diet were supposed to receive sweet and sour chicken, fluffy steamed rice, stir fried vegetables, an egg roll, and sherbet. Observation on 01/10/24 at 12:00 P.M. of the steamtable at lunch service revealed there was no fluffy steamed rice or steamed carrots. No croissants were observed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper infection prevention precautions to prevent the spread of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This had the potential to affect all 32 residents (#3, #4, #6, #23, #25, #29, #31, #35, #39, #42, #43, #45, #50, #53, #55, #56, #59, #60, #65, #70, #72, #74, #81, #82, #85, #87, #92, #94, #96, #101, #113, #324) who were negative for RSV and resided on the K hall and C hall. The facility census was 122. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed the Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included ischemic cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, hypertension, mild protein calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation. and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment, dated 12/22/23, revealed Resident #54 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #54's physician orders revealed the resident tested positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 19 (#9, #10, #23, #27, #43, #64, #66, #71, #72, #74, #84, #87, #92, #103, #110, #116, #118, #326, and #475) residents who the facility identified as independently mobile and able to use the pool table in the K hallway. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Observation of the pool table in the K hallway common area on 01/09/24 at 3:00 P.M. revealed there was a red chunky substance on the table surface. Observation of the pool table in the K hallway common area on 01/10/24 at 8:30 A.M. revealed there was a red chunky substance on the table surface. Observation of the pool table in the K hallway common area on 01/10/24 at 1:00 P.M. revealed there was a red chunky substance on the table surface. Observation of the pool table in the K hallway common area on 01/11/24 at 8:00 A.M. revealed there was a red chunky substance on the table surface. Observation of the pool table in the K hallway common area and interview with Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #102's primary language of Spanish was addressed in the comprehensive care plan. This affected one (Resident #102) out of one resident reviewed for communication. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed Resident #102 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure, emphysema, seizures, anoxic brain damage, persistent vegetative state, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #102's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/17/23, revealed the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was unable to be completed due to Resident #102's inability to communicate with speech. Staff reported Resident #102 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #102's care plan revealed Resident #102 had impaired social interaction/social isolation. Resident #102 was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided as care planned and preferred in order to meet the needs of the residents. This affected two residents (#24 and #108) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 122. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #108 revealed an admission date of 11/15/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, burn of unspecified degree of right and left lower leg, contractures of left and right knee, dysphagia, depression, and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/22/23, revealed Resident #108 had severely impaired cognition. He had impaired range of motion on both sides of his upper and lower extremities. For activities, it was important for him to listen to music, to have books, newspapers and magazines, to be around pets, and to do things in groups. Review of Resident #108's plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented as ordered. This affected one resident (#104) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 03/24/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery, anxiety disorder, depression, hemiplegia, type two diabetes mellitus, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/01/23, revealed Resident #104 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care, dated 03/24/23, revealed Resident #104 was at risk for falls and fall related injuries related to weakness, psychotropic medications, requiring assistance with transfers, history of falls, and hemiplegia to left side. Interventions included anticipating and meeting needs, assessing risk for falls, bed in low position while in bed, encouraging appropriate footwear, keeping environment safe,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to adequately obtain/monitor resident blood pressures in order to ensure antihypertensive medication was administered as ordered. This affected one resident (#114) of five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #114 revealed an admission date of 10/21/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, paranoid personality disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, delusional disorders, hallucinations, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment, dated 10/28/23, revealed Resident #114 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care for Resident #114 revealed he was at risk for cardiac complications related to multiple cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, chronic heart failure, and hyperlipidemia. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, completing vital signs as ordered, and observing and reporting any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adaptive equipment at meals as needed. This affected one (Resident #39) out of six residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 122. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia, aphasia, type two diabetes, gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD), depression, unspecified atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety, and bells palsy. Review of Resident #39's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/28/23, revealed Resident #39 received a therapeutic, mechanically altered diet. Observation of Resident #39's meal tray ticket for the lunch meal on 01/08/24, revealed the resident was to have a divided plate. Observation of Resident #39's lunch tray on 01/08/24 at 12:58 P.M., revealed the resident was eating the meal while in bed. The meal was served on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate antibiotic treatment orders when Resident #132's diabetic ulcer became infected. This affected one resident (Resident #132) of three residents reviewed for infections. The facility census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #132 revealed an admission date of 10/26/23 with diagnoses including diabetic ulcer to his left planter first digit, diabetes mellitus type two, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #132's Skin and Wound assessment, dated 10/27/23 revealed the resident was admitted with a diabetic ulcer to his left plantar digit (hallux) measuring 3.5 centimeters (cm) length by 2.5 cm width, and 0.2 cm deep. At the time of admission, the assessment stated there were no signs of infection. Review of Resident #132's podiatry consult dated 11/13/23 revealed the resident was seen regarding his ulcer and a wound culture was done. The consult stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain ordered lab work for Resident #132. This affected one resident (#132) of three residents reviewed for laboratory testing The facility census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #132 revealed an admission date of 10/26/23 with diagnoses including diabetic ulcer to his left planter first digit, diabetes mellitus type two, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #47's progress note dated 11/14/23 revealed Resident #132 was a patient with chronic kidney disease, stage three. The note stated that the facility will monitor his kidney function this week and follow with Nephrology. Review of CNP #47's progress note dated 11/17/23 revealed the practitioner was seeing Resident #132 today in an acute visit for complaints of generalized malaise. The patient tested positive for COVID-19. The patient was having some symptoms, appeared ill, tired, and was resting more often. He complained of generalized weakness and had a little scratchy throat. CNP #47 went on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure antibiotic stewardship procedures were followed regarding wound cultures obtained during consultation appointments. This affected one resident (Resident #132) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility census was 117. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #132 revealed an admission date of 10/26/23 with diagnoses including diabetic ulcer to his left planter first digit, diabetes mellitus type two, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #132's Skin and Wound assessment, dated 10/27/23 revealed the resident was admitted with a diabetic ulcer to his left plantar digit (hallux) measuring 3.5 centimeters (cm) length by 2.5 cm width and 0.2 cm deep. At the time of admission, the assessment stated there were no signs of infection. Review of Resident #132's podiatry consult, dated 11/13/23 revealed the resident was seen regarding his ulcer and a wound culture was completed. The consult stated the results would be ready in three to four days. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of shower documentation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received assistance with grooming and personal hygiene. This affected four of four residents reviewed for ADL's (Residents #16, #49, #105, and #368). The census was 125. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #105's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, dementia, diabetes, and legal blindness. Review of the annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He required extensive assistance of one staff member for transfers, dressing, toilet use, bathing and personal hygiene. Plan of care dated 02/23/20 revealed a self care performance deficit with ADL's. Review of the bath schedule revealed Resident #105 was to receive a shower on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Review of the documentation revealed no shower was documented between 12/01/21 to 12/08/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #57) received tracheotomy care in a manner to prevent potential infection. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure three resident's (Residents #24, #39, #115) oxygen equipment was stored in a sanitary manner. This affected one of one resident reviewed for tracheotomy/ventilator use and three of four residents reviewed for oxygen use. Findings Included: 1. Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an original admission date of 12/19/20 with the latest readmission of 04/07/20. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, status tracheotomy, dependence on ventilator, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, status gastrostomy, hypertension, anemia, mood disorder, insomnia, chronic pain, anxiety, carcinoma of skin of face, basal cell carcinoma of skin of face, dependence on supplement oxygen and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control and COVID-19 policies and procedures. This affected eight (Residents #10, #27, #38, #58, #61 #67, #99, and #109) of nine residents reviewed for infection control procedures. The census was 125. Findings include: 1. Observations on 01/03/22 from 12:20 P.M. to 12:45 P.M. revealed Business Office Manager (BOM) #261 enter into Resident #10 and Resident #61 room. Residents #10 and #61 had a personal protective equipment (PPE) cart and sign on the door to indicate that they were on droplet/contact isolation precautions. BOM #261 entered the room with eye protection, N95 mask, gown and gloves to deliver the trays. When she left the room, she did not change her mask, nor did she clean her face shield. She went in six different rooms before she changed her mask and cleaned her face shield (after being asked about the proper procedures for coming out of a room that was on isolation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide beneficiary notices for skilled services being discontinued in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #47 and #58) of three resident beneficiary notices reviewed. The census was 125. Findings Include: Review of Resident #47 beneficiary notice letter revealed his skilled services started on 10/20/21. The end date of his skilled services was scheduled to be 11/27/21. In review of his medical records, the facility did not have evidence that Resident #47's responsible party signed the beneficiary notice form. There was evidence that it was sent to Resident #47 responsible party via mail, but they never received a signed copy. Also, according to Resident #47's progress notes, the facility contacted Resident #47's responsible party to explain about the date when the skilled services would end, their appeal rights, and contact information for those appeals. The date of this communication was on 11/26/21, one day prior to the skilled services ending. Review of Resident #58 beneficiary notice letter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview the facility failed to provide a resident personal privacy during a medical treatment. This affected one of 125 residents (Resident #57). Findings Included: Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed the latest readmission of 04/07/20. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, status tracheotomy, dependence on ventilator, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, status gastrostomy, hypertension, anemia, mood disorder, insomnia, chronic pain, anxiety, carcinoma of skin of face, basal cell carcinoma of skin of face, dependence on supplement oxygen and constipation. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had no speech, sometimes understood others, rarely/never made herself understood and had a severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on two staff for activities of daily living (ADL). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for residents. This was observed in two of ten hallways (L and M hallways) and affected 43 residents residing on the affected hallways. The census was 125. Findings include: On 01/06/22 from 3:00 P.M. to 3:11 P.M. tour of the L and M hallways with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #288 revealed the following: 1. Room L 7: Wall with multiple areas and chipped paint 2. Room L-2: Wall gouged into drywall behind and beside head board 3. Room L-5: Wall scuffed and gouged behind head board 4. Room M-6: Wall had multiple places in room that were patched and not painted 5. On the M hallway on both sides there was wall paper torn in multiple places and black scuffed areas observed 6. The L/M lounge area had walls scuffed and chipped. Interview with LPN #288 verified the above observations at the time of the tour.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) records after a significant change. This affected two (Resident #16 and Resident #46) of six resident PASRR forms reviewed. The census was 125. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart disease, type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, adjustment disorder (05/03/21), unspecified psychosis, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, vitamin D deficiency, dry eye syndrome, osteoarthritis, hypokalemia, and personal history of transient ischemic attack. According to his Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment (dated 10/05/21) revealed he was cognitively intact, based on his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of Resident #16 medical records revealed under section C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an updated and accurate Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for residents when they are first admitted to the facility. This affected two (Resident #6 and Resident #73) of six residents PASRR forms reviewed. The census was 125. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were dementia with behavioral disturbances, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease, anemia, dysphagia, chronic respiratory failure, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, osteoarthritis, vitamin D deficiency, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, type II diabetes, and shortness of breath. According to his Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment (dated 12/22/21), he had no cognitive impairment, due to his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score being 13. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report a significant change of a resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) records to the state mental health agency. This affected two (Resident #16 and Resident #46) of six resident PASRR forms reviewed. The census was 125. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart disease, type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, adjustment disorder (05/03/21), unspecified psychosis, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, vitamin D deficiency, dry eye syndrome, osteoarthritis, hypokalemia, and personal history of transient ischemic attack. According to his Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment (dated 10/05/21) revealed he was cognitively intact, based on his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of Resident #16's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on activity record documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide on-going activities. This affected one of two residents reviewed for activities (Resident #24). The census was 125. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia and atrial fibrillation. Review of the annual minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact, he required extensive assistance of two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and extensive assistance of on staff member for dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the activity plan of care dated 03/02/21 revealed he prefers to engage in activities independently in the room but is willing to attend programs as interested. He likes to sit in lobby and people watch sometimes, and wheel up and down the halls. He likes to watch TV, read, participate in socials and listen to music.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, facility failed to ensure Resident #46 had eyeglasses in functional working condition when her glasses were broken. This affected one resident of one reviewed for assistive devices. Facility census was 125. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 10/08/21. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia, post traumatic seizures, dysphagia, hypertension, major depression disorder, anxiety disorder, fibromyalgia, muscle wasting, spinal stenosis, post-traumatic stress disorder, contracture of the left wrist, shoulder and hand. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and required extensive assistance of two staff members and was totally dependent for transfers. Resident #46 was incontinent of bladder and incontinent of bowels. Resident #46's vision was impaired and the resident wore corrective lenses. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer interventions were maintained. This affected one (Resident #109) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ASHD, diabetes, morbid obesity and hypothyroidism. Review of the significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was not intact. She required extensive assistance of two or more staff members, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. A stage II pressure ulcer was identified (Stage II pressure ulcer is defined as partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer. The wound bed is viable, pink or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister). Review revealed a pressure ulcer risk assessment dated [DATE] which identified Resident #109 as low risk for development of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #57) physician ordered contracture prevention device was in place as ordered. This affected one of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings Include: Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an original admission date of 12/19/20 with the latest readmission of 04/07/20. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, status tracheotomy, dependence on ventilator, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, status gastrostomy, hypertension, anemia, mood disorder, insomnia, chronic pain, anxiety, carcinoma of skin of face, basal cell carcinoma of skin of face, dependence on supplement oxygen and constipation. Review of Resident #57's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had no speech, sometimes understood others, rarely/never made herself understood and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately monitor and treat one resident (Resident #81) constipation with known history of small bowel obstruction. This affected one of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. Findings Included: Review of Resident #81's medical record revealed an original admission date of 10/30/20 with the latest readmission of 11/17/21. Diagnoses included partial intestinal obstruction, constipation, diabetes mellitus, severe morbid obesity, chronic pain, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary embolism, major depressive disorder, insomnia, mixed irritable bowel syndrome, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, post-traumatic stress disorder, malignant neoplasm of prostate, lymphedema, dry eye syndrome, presbyopia, osteoarthritis, spinal stenosis and vitamin D deficiency. Review of the acute care Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 was admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #57) enteral feeding formula was labeled and not spoiled. This affected one of one resident reviewed for enteral feeding. Findings Included: Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an original admission date of 12/19/20 with the latest readmission of 04/07/20. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, status tracheotomy, dependence on ventilator, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, status gastrostomy, hypertension, anemia, mood disorder, insomnia, chronic pain, anxiety, carcinoma of skin of face, basal cell carcinoma of skin of face, dependence on supplement oxygen and constipation. Review of Resident #57's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had no speech, sometimes understood others, rarely/never made herself understood and had a severely cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly. Multiple stock medications were expired in Unit 3's Medication Room. This affected one of two medication storage rooms observed for medication storage and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census is 125. Findings include: An observation, on [DATE] at 8:02 AM, revealed Unit 3's Medication Room contained the stock medications for the unit. The following stock medications were observed to be expired: One bottle of Vitamin B6 with an expiration date of 10/21. Three bottles of Vitamin B12 with an expiration date of 08/21. Two bottles of Niacin with an expiration date of 08/21. One bottle of Vitamin C with an expiration date 08/21. An interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #271, on [DATE] at 8:12 A.M., revealed no stock medications in the medication room should be expired. RN #271 stated the medications should have been discarded at the time of expiration. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews of staff, residents, and the certified nurse practitioner, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services according to physician orders. This affected two residents (Residents #46 and #105) of two reviewed for laboratory orders. Facility census was 125. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 10/08/21. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia, post traumatic seizures, dysphagia, hypertension, major depression disorder, anxiety disorder, fibromyalgia, muscle wasting, spinal stenosis, post-traumatic stress disorder, contracture of the left wrist, shoulder and hand. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and required extensive assistance of two staff members and was totally dependent for transfers. Resident #46 was incontinent of bladder and incontinent of bowels. Resident #46's vision was impaired and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-12 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAUREL OHIO OPERATIONS GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2018
LAUREL HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2018
KHAN, ANISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018
LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
MOORE, CRYSTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2018
SLAYBAUGH, RANDALLIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018
STOBB, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$715K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 4%Other / private 37%

This home reported $715K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$324per resident / day
operating cost
$9,846per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$307per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365466. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next