Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 118.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-01-31 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform life saving measures to a resident that was documented as a full code (When a person has no heartbeat and not breathing, CPR/cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be administered). This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] when nursing staff failed to perform CPR on R19 or call emergency services (911) when found with no heartbeat and was not breathing. This deficient practice placed all 95 residents at risk for the likelihood of serious injury, harm, and/or death from code status not being followed by staff. Findings include: Record review of R19's face sheet revealed admission into the facility on [DATE] with a pertinent diagnosis of benign neoplasm of meninges (tumors growing in membranes around the brain). According to the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], R19 had impaired cognition and was extensive assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Record review of Resident Code Status revealed a document that was signed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake 2706021.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain legal consent and failed to provide education for the Covid-19 vaccination for one resident (R101) out of three residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of immunizations revealed an administration date of 12/12/2024 of the Covid-19 vaccination. Route of administration- Intramuscularly, Dose and Unit 0.5 ml, administered by Infection Preventionist (IP) A. Review of R101's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed: Immunization- SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) Status-Complete-Consent Confirmed By, (IP) A, Confirmation Date 12/12/2024, Education Provided.On 04/15/26 at 2:30pm, Family Member B was interviewed regarding complaint about the administration of the Covid-19 vaccination. Family Member B stated, I would never consent to the Covid-19 immunization for R101 due to R101's medical condition. I did not give verbal or written consent for this immunization and R101 was unable to provide consent for himself. Family Member B also said that Covid-19 education was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to 2677888. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of injury of unknown source to the State Agency in a timely manner for one resident (R105), out of six residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for unresolved resident concerns. Findings include:The facility self-reported incident (FRI) was received on 11/11/25. The incident was discovered on 11/7/25. A review of the facility's 5-Day investigation documented in part the following: On 11/7/25 at approximately 9:15 AM, R105 went to the nurses station and showed the nurse her left arm. There was a bruise on her left arm. It was purplish in color and was 3 1/2 inches by 2 inches on the forearm above the elbow. R105 told the nurse that she woke up with the bruise. R105 could not give an explanation of how she received the bruise. Staff that worked on the days before 11/6/25 and 11/7/25 did not see a bruise on R105's arm. R105 did go out on a LOA (leave of absence) with her guardian. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes 2628767 and 2674347. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely submit documentation of completed investigations to the State Agency for alleged resident-to-resident sexual abuse for two residents (R101 and R102) and alleged resident-to-resident physical abuse for two residents (R102 and R103) out of six residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential delay for opportunities to implement corrective measures and interventions. Findings include: R101, R102A facility self-reported incident (FRI) was received by the State Agency (SA) on 8/8/25. The FRI documented that on 8/8/25 at approximately 2:30 PM, it was witnessed that R102 was in his wheelchair rolling towards his room. R101 was in her wheelchair rolling in the direction of R102. When the two residents rolled past each other, R102 reached his arm over to move R101's head towards him and then R102 kissed R101 on the mouth. R102 then rolled to his room and R101 rolled to the dining room. R101…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered properly and per physician's orders for one resident (R108) of three residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in the potential for less than therapeutic effect of the prescribed medication when medications were not taken or administered properly. Findings include: In an observation and interview on 12/15/25 at 9:35 AM, R108 was awake and lying in bed. While grimacing and holding her stomach, R108 said her stomach hurts. R108 said she reported her stomach pain to Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) J. On 12/15/25 at 9:37 AM, CNA J indicated that she told Registered Nurse (RN) I that R108 was in pain. On 12/15/25 at 9:45 AM, RN I denied being informed that R108 was in pain. RN I and the State Surveyor went into R108's room. R108 again stated that she had pain in her stomach. While in R108's room, seven unidentified oral medications were observed on R108's overbed table; two tablets were loose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2635308.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly secure a television for one resident (R101) out of four residents reviewed for accidents resulting in R101 receiving a head injury.Findings include:On 10/8/2025 at 10:15 AM R101 was observed seated in a wheelchair in the common area with a bump on her forehead. When R101 was asked about the bump she was unable to explain how she received it.Record review of R101's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease and Dementia.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R101 had severe cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one out of 15 and was dependent for mobility except for eating where she required set up.On 10/8/2025 at 11:10 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B was interviewed and said she was assigned to work with R101 when the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00153561. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for one resident (R902) out of one resident with severe cognitive impairment, resulting in three residents (R901, R903, and R904) verbalizing lack of privacy and security. Findings include: Record review of allegation sent to State Agency revealed R902 had entered R901's room several times without invitation. An interview was conducted on 6/17/25 at 11:04 AM with R901 on the second floor of facility, it was reported that R902 at the time that the allegation was reported, had wandered into the resident's room multiple times. R902 would pick up and look at resident's belongings and had covered the resident with blankets while in the bed. R901 further reported not feeling safe when R902 would enter the room. Record review of 901's electronic medical records revealed admission into the facility on 6/27/23 with a pertinent diagnosis of paraplegia (paralysis). According to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Properly date-label food in the freezer; 2. Ensure proper cooling of cooked, potentially hazardous (time-temperature for safety) food, macaroni and cheese; 3. Recognize unpasteurized shell eggs were used for the preparation of over easy eggs; 4. Ensure kitchen staff properly used hair restraints; and 5. Ensure pans were allowed to air dry before stacking. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the kitchen, resulting in the increased potential for food borne illness. Findings include: On 5/12/25 beginning at 8:40 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen began with Dietary Aide (DA) O and the following was observed in the reach-in freezer: three undated opened bags of French fries and one undated opened bag of chicken. The following was observed inside of the walk-in cooler: One half-size pan of previously cooked macaroni and cheese dated 5/11 and 5/14. One opened case of shelled eggs dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-14 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
  Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis to meet the psychosocial, mental, and behavioral health care needs of residents in a facility with more than 120 beds. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that reside within the facility. Findings include: An interview was conducted on 5/12/25 at 1:30 PM with the Director of Nursing. It was reported that the facility did not have a social worker available. An interview was conducted on 5/13/25 at 1:30 PM with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). It was reported that the facility had 124 beds online. It was further reported that the facility does not currently employ a full-time social worker and has not had one since the week of Easter (April 21, 2025). During a phone interview on 5/14/25 at 1:45 PM the Medical Director reported no knowledge that the facility did not have a full-time social worker available at this time. Review of facility policy Social Service Program dated 9/7/2023, it was documented, The facility will provide medically…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide follow-up to the (Department of Community Health/ form 3877/78) during annual review and to ensure the form was submitted to the local Community Mental Health Services Program (CMHSP) for a level two OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) evaluations annually for six (R28, R48, R77, R96, R97 and R99) of six residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR). Findings include: R28 A clinical record review revealed R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Psychotic Disorder with Hallucination, Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood and Pulmonary Fibrosis. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R26 scored a 00/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score which indicated severely impaired cognition. Further review of the most current 3877 triggered the need for a 3878 form to be completed. R48 A clinical record review revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan for one (R97) of one resident reviewed for updated care plans when a resident diagnoses was corrected and changed. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R97 was originally admitted on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Further review revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicated intact cognintion. A review of the care plan revealed a focus of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. On 5/13/2025 a review of the care plan was made with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse S regarding R97's diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. MDS Nurse S revealed a Psychiatric Evaluation dated 11/26/24 without a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and that a correction had been made on the MDS at that time. Further review of the EMR revealed a care plan with an initiation date of 9/19/2024 by Social Services and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI