Regency at Fremont
4554 West 48th Street, Fremont, MI 49412 · For profit - Corporation · 129 certified beds · (231) 924-3990 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.5% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.1% | 12.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.5% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.4% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.7% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.1% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.59 | 1.64 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.5%CMS range 35.8–60.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.6–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.0–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 87.7 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2715766Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly identify a change in condition and act upon those changes for 1 resident (Resident #6) out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in a delay in medical treatment and surgical intervention for an unstable sacral fracture with spinopelvic dissociation and left superior/inferior ramus fractureFindings:Resident #6 (R6)Review of an admission Record revealed R6 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: sacral and pelvic fractures from fall and Parkinson's Disease.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R6, with a reference date of 11/6/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R6 was cognitively intact. Review of R6's Kardex revealed: Monitors: report to Nurse s/sx (signs and symptoms) of (the) following.change in normal behavior.decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to intake #MI00137878 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policy and best practice standards related to fall management for two residents (Resident #3 and Resident #2) by (a) not providing increased supervision, (b) not notifying the physician of low blood pressures, (c) not completing and/or maintaining neurological assessments after falls, (c) not correctly completing a fall assessment, (d) moving a resident after a fall before being assessed by a nurse, and (e) not updating or accurately completing care plans, resulting in falls with injury. Findings: Resident #3 (R3) Review of an admission Record revealed R3 was a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], after a fall at home that required surgical intervention, and with pertinent diagnoses of end stage renal failure with dependence on dialysis, high blood pressure, and weakness/ paralysis of left arm and leg following a stroke. R3 was her own responsible person. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This site pertains to the annual survey and Intake 3017765.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate hot food temperatures and failed to serve palatable/quality food items for residents eating food prepared in the kitchen.Findings include:During an interview on 6/08/26 at 3:02 PM, Complainant J revealed a concern about the poor quality and lack of food being served. Complainant J stated, There is often not enough food on the plate. What is being served is horrible and unappetizing. Complainant J further revealed she brought in meals practically daily to ensure her resident, ate at least one decent meal a day. During a kitchen observation on 6/08/26 at 11:43 AM, [NAME] K was observed taking temperatures prior to plating resident food from the steam table. A large hotel pan of what looked like pureed sausage gravy was temped at 155 degrees. [NAME] K revealed thick white gravy substance was beef stroganoff. The noodles in the next large pan looked to overcooked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the use of and utilize personal protective equipment for three of three residents (Resident #102, Resident #69, and Resident #70) reviewed for infection control and failed to clean glucometers according to manufacturer guidelines. Findings:Resident #102 (R102) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R102 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of acute kidney failure. Review of an admission Nursing Comprehensive Evaluation completed 06/06/26 revealed the following observed skin concerns: (a) Groin-open boil with dressing to left groin, (b) Coccyx-unstageable pressure injury, and (c) Abdomen-bilateral open boils to folds. During an observation on 06/07/26 at 3:01 AM, no PPE (personal protective equipment) sat near the room for staff to utilize during close contact care nor was a sign posted near the resident's room alerting staff of the need to utilize enhanced barrier precautions. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%) for 1 of 8 residents (R34) observed during the medication administration task, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. Findings include: A review of R34's admission Record, dated 6/8/25, revealed they were a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R34's admission Record revealed they had multiple diagnoses that included dementia. During a medication administration observation on 6/8/26 at 7:35 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) B administered multiple medications to R34, including folic acid 400 micrograms (mcg) (1 tablet) and magnesium oxide 400 milligrams (mg) (1 tablet). RN B verbalized the medications, doses, and quantities of the tablets. A review of R34's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 6/1/26 to 6/8/26, revealed R34 was to receive folic acid 1 mg at 8:00 AM. However, RN B only administered 400 mcg (0.4 mg) of folic acid to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation is related to intake #2741450Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 7 of 25 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings:During an observation on 05/04/26 at 5:00 AM, the resident in bed 100-1 laid resting in bed with her eyes closed and the call light touch pad hung over the back of the head board, out of sight and out of reach of the resident. The resident in bed 100-2 laid in bed resting with her eyes closed and the call light was curled up on top of the blanket at the foot of the bed out of sight and out of reach of the resident.During an observation on 05/04/26 at 5:02 AM, the resident in bed 104-1 laid resting in bed with her eyes closed and the call light sat on the floor at the head of the bed, out of sight and out of reach of the resident. During an observation on 05/04/26 at 5:04 AM, the resident in bed 105-1 laid resting in bed with her eyes closed and the call light sat on the floor between the bed and the wall, out of sight and out of reach of the resident.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2984523Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to (a) adequately monitor for medication side effects, (b) prescribe medications with an adequate/correct indication, and (c) frequently monitor and re-assess the effectiveness of the medications for one of three residents (Resident #100) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings:Resident #100 (R100)Review of an admission Record revealed R100 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with facility diagnoses of dementia, alcohol abuse with alcohol-induced mood disorder, and alcohol use, unspecified with alcohol-induced persisting dementia. During a telephone interview on 05/03/26 at 4:23 PM, Family Member (FM) T stated that almost two years ago R100 had genetic testing done for early onset Alzheimer's. R100 had the APOE-e4 marker with two copies which were very rare genetic markers. The testing was done due to R100 not acting like herself for some time, she lost her job due to poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, starting at 7:15 AM on 4/8/25, an interview with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) X, found that most food items are held for three days. An observation of the two door Victory refrigeration unit, at 7:25 AM on 4/8/25, found a bag of sliced turkey dated 3/31 to 4/6. During a tour of the Masterside Kitchenette, starting at 8:24 AM on 4/8/25, an interview with CDM X found that dietary comes and checks the refrigeration unit daily for restock and housekeeping cleans the refrigeration unit. Further observation inside of the unit found 10 expired yogurts with best by dates of March 8th, March 14th, and April 4th. Observation of the J Wing Kitchenette, at 8:34 AM on 4/8/25, found 12 nutritional juice drinks and shakes stored in the unit with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation had two deficient practice statements. DPS A Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #18, Resident #31, Resident #36, Resident #63) reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings: Resident #18 (R18) Review of an admission Record revealed R18 was a [AGE] year old male with pertinent diagnoses of severe intellectual disabilities, seizure disorder, unsteadiness on feet, expressive language disorder, and muscle weakness. During an observation on 04/08/25 at 6:38 AM, R18 laid in bed resting with his eyes closed and the call light touch pad sat on the floor near the foot of the bed out of sight and out of reach of R18. Review of a fall prevention and safety Care Plan for R18 reflected the following intervention .provide R18 with a touch pad call light to assist in calling for staff assistance. Resident #31 (R31) Review of an admission Record revealed R31 was an [AGE] year old male with pertinent diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond to grievance issues raised by the Resident Council resulting in an ineffective forum for the presentation of grievances and recommendations to the facility affecting all facility residents. Findings: On 4/8/25 at 9:59 AM an interview was conducted with R60 who reported she was the Resident Council President. R60 reported two main issues are regularly raised by the Resident Council at monthly meetings. R60 reported one issue is delayed call light response. R60 also reported that call lights are often turned off and staff leave the room without meeting the resident's needs but claiming they will return shortly. R60 reported staff frequently fail to return to the resident's room after turning off a call light and indicated the Resident Council attendees have expressed frustration over this. The second issue is that meals are not served on time and that the Dining Room would be filled with residents waiting for long periods of time for food to be served. R60 reported the facility will say they will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) accurately document the administration of controlled medications and 2.) ensure controlled medications were administered following the providers order for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #75, #78, #62, and #80), reviewed for controlled medication administration. Findings: Resident #75 (R75) Review of an admission Record revealed R75 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R75's Order Summary dated 8/9/24 revealed, Temazepam Oral Capsule 15 MG (Temazepam) *Controlled Drug* Give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for Severe Manic Bipolar 1 Disorder with Psychotic Behavior. Review of R75's Controlled Substances Proof of Use form revealed the temazepam was not documented as dispensed on 4/5/25. Review of R75's Medication Administration Record revealed the temazepam was documented as administered. Review of R75's Order Summary dated 2/9/25-2/12/25 revealed, LORazepam (Ativan) Oral Tablet 1 MG (Lorazepam) *Controlled Drug* Give 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transport residents in wheelchairs for 6 residents (Resident #50, #43, #31, #1, #7, and #37) out of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Findings: Resident # 50 (R50) Review of an admission Record revealed R50 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's Disease, unsteadiness on feet, history of falling, and muscle weakness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R50, with a reference date of 2/3/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R50 was severely cognitively impaired. During an observation on 04/09/25 at 09:04 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)F pushed R50 in a wheelchair without footrests from the dining room to the nurses station on the 500 hall. At 09:06 AM, CNA F pushed R50 in a wheelchair without footrests from the nurses station down the hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified care and treatment of two facility residents (R136 and R66) and failed to ensure communication for self-determination of care for one resident (61) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Findings: R136 Review of the admission Record reflected R136 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the left ankle and foot. The medical record reflected R136 was able to make his own medical decisions. Review of the Care Plan for R136 reflected Toileting. (name of R136) will require assistance to the toilet every two hours and as needed. He may utilize a urinal, bed pan, or use the full body lift to the toilet. Initiated 4/4/25. The Care Plan reflected Ambulation/Locomotion (name of R136) is unable to ambulate at this time (due to) NWB (non-weight bearing) status of BLE (bilateral lower extremities) initiated 4/4/25. And the Care Plan reflected Put the call light within reach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one of three residents (Resident #29) reviewed for dignity and respect. Findings: Resident #29 (R29) Review of an admission Record revealed R29 was a [AGE] year old male, last admitted to the facility on [DATE], who suffered from severe cognitive impairment and depended on staff to meet all of his daily needs. During an observation on 04/09/25 at 11:56 AM, R29 sat in a broda chair at the dining room table and his pants were visibly wet with urine. During an observation on 04/09/25 at 01:04 PM, R29 remained in the broda chair at the dining room table, his pants were visibly wet with urine. During an observation on 04/09/25 at 01:07 PM staff brought R29 from the dining room to the nurses station and placed him next to two other residents. R29's sweat pants remained visibly wet in the crotch area. During an observation on 04/09/25 at 01:23 PM staff took R29 to his room to change his clothing and provide peri-care.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in 1 (R23) of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessment, from a total sample of 18. Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.19.1, October 2024, Chapter 3 Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, revealed .The intent of the items in this section is to identify any special treatments, procedures, and programs that the resident received or performed during the specified time periods .The treatments, procedures, and programs listed in Item O0110, Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, can have a profound effect on an individual's health status, self-image, dignity, and quality of life .Reevaluation of special treatments and procedures the resident received or performed, or programs that the resident was involved in during the 14-day look-back period is important to ensure the continued appropriateness of the treatments, procedures, or programs . J1. Dialysis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to formulate and implement a comprehensive communication Care Plan for one non-English speaking resident (R61) of one resident reviewed for communication. Findings: Review of the admission Record reflected R61 admitted to the facility 3/20/25 with diagnoses that included absence of left and right legs. The medical record reflected R61 was her own responsible party and was a Spanish speaking resident. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R61 did not reveal a communication Care Plan to provide guidance to staff on meeting the needs of this Spanish speaking Resident. Review of the medical provider documentation of 4/4/25 acknowledged the Resident is Spanish speaking only. The documentation reflected that She (R61) says she is painful today but cannot rate it. Denies chest pain, shortness of breath. The documentation reflected Exam Findings appears painful and Resident was weaning off narcotics, will try to continue this with family approval despite the medical record indicating R61 was her own decision maker. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure comprehensive nursing assessments were completed and 2.) identify and notify the provider of a change in condition for 1 resident (Resident #85) out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings: Resident #85 (R85) Review of an admission Record revealed R85 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (progressive damage/inflammation of brains white matter.) Review of R85's provider Progress Note dated 1/9/25 revealed, .Resident guardian has continued to request resident be sent to hospital for any acute changes in health status. Due to resident decline it is expected that he will be resent to hospital at some point . Review of R85's Hospital Discharge Records revealed the following hospitalizations since his admission to the facility: *10/31/24-11/6/25 severe sepsis *11/9/24-11/10/24 fever with unspecified fever cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures and prevent a facility acquired pressure ulcer, had conflicting assessment documentation, and revise the care plan for one (R27) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the Facility Matrix provided by the facility at beginning of this survey on 4/8/25 revealed R27 was not documented as having a pressure ulcer. Resident #27 (R27) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R27 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of a displaced fracture of the left humerus (long bone in arm from the shoulder to the elbow), diabetes, and obesity. No pressure ulcers. Review of an admission Nursing Comprehensive Evaluation dated 2/24/25 for R27 revealed no pressure ulcers upon admission. Review of the admission Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk for R27 dated 2/24/25 revealed she was at a low risk for developing pressure sores. Review of a Skin and Wound Evaluation dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in interview and record review the facility failed to act upon a Pharmacy recommendation for a psychoactive medication for one facility resident (R137). Findings: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected R137 admitted to the facility 3/20/25 with diagnoses that included non-Traumatic Brain Dysfunction. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review the EMR revealed a medication pharmacy review for R137 was conducted on 3/22/25 and the pharmacist had documented a recommendation. Review of the EMR documentation titled Consultation Report dated 3/22/25 revealed a pharmacy recommendation that R137 had a (as needed) Doctor's Order for the anxiolytic medication Lorazepam without a stop date. The pharmacy recommendation reflected the requirement for as-needed non-antipsychotic psychotropic drugs be limited to 14 days unless the prescriber documents the diagnosed specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for wound and peri-care for two (R66 and R29) of two residents and follow blood borne practices for one (Resident #30) of one residents, reviewed for infection control. Findings include: Resident #66 (R66) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R66 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis and diabetes. During an observation on 4/8/25 at 7:37 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) O was providing surgical wound care for R66. LPN O removed the old dressing that was packed into the wound and cleansed the wound with normal saline. She changed her gloves with no hand hygiene and proceeded to pack the wound with long gauze soaked with Dakins solution. The tail end of the gauze was touching the residents clean brief and her leg. LPN O continued with packing the wound. When LPN O completed the dressing change, she removed her gown that was caught on her hair tie and removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the facility assessment. Findings: During an entrance conference interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 2/5/25 at 8:50 AM, the NHA reported the current census was 93 residents. Review of the Facility Assessment provided to the surveyor during the abbreviated survey reflected the assessment was based on a Resident Population Profile from July 11, 2023-July 10, 2024. At this time, the average daily census was 73 residents. The assessment had not been updated to reflect the increased census and acuity. A Core Staffing and Personnel Audit attached to the assessment had not been reviewed since August 6, 2024 . Further review of the facility assessment indicated the NHA and the Director of Nursing (DON) had not been updated to reflect individuals currently in those roles, which had changed since July 10, 2024. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:28 PM, the NHA reported she had been the facility Administrator for 90 days and did not know she needed to update the Facility Assessment.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (Resident #2) right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident (Resident #1). Findings: Resident #1 (R1) Review of an admission Record reflected R1 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, mood disorder due to known physiological reason and a personal history of traumatic brain injury. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R1 was severely cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4/15. R1 exhibited A. Physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching grabbing, abusing others sexually as well as wandering behaviors in 1-3 days during the look back period. Review of a mental health consult note dated 12/10/24 reflected R1 had sexually inappropriate behavior on 11/19/25 (it was alleged R1 touched a female resident's breast). The note indicated R1 started to masturbate in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI000149220 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor blood pressures and/or follow physician ordered parameters prior to administering blood pressure medications for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for medication parameter monitoring, resulting in the potential for serious adverse effects of medications. Findings include: A review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, last revised 10/17/23, revealed, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician . 5. If applicable and/or prescribed, take vital signs or tests prior to administration of the dose, e.g , pulse with digitalis, blood pressure with anti-hypertensive, etc . A review of R3's admission Record, dated 1/24/25, revealed R3 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R3's admission Record revealed multiple diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and Torsades de Pointes (a potentially fatal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00146674 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2) was free from abuse of three reviewed, resulting in Resident #2 being abused by a staff member. Findings include: Review of Abuse Prohibition Policy last revised 9/9/22 revealed Each guest/resident shall be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. Abuse shall include freedom from verbal, mental, sexual, physical abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience that are not required to treat guest's/resident's medical symptoms. Further review of the policy reflects Verbal Abuse is the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the guest/resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation or degradation regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper label and dating of foods and documentation of food temperatures effecting 70 residents receiving meals from the kitchen resulting in increased the risk of contaminated foods and the risk of food borne illness. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 4/16/2024 at 9:57 AM the following was observed in the reach in the freezer: 12 cups of strawberry shortcake ice cream in Styrofoam cups without a label and date During an initial tour of the kitchen on 4/16/2024 at 9:57 AM the following was observed in the reach in the refrigerator: 1 peanut butter and jelly sandwich in a plastic bag in a shallow pan with no date Approximately 20-8 oz cups of juice on a tray with no label and date During the initial tour, Dietary Manager (DM) H stated that the ice cream, peanut butter and jelly sandwich and juices should have labels and dates on them. On 4/17/2024 at 11:26 AM, during kitchen rounds, review of the time/temperature food preparation log from 4/2/2024 revealed that the temperature for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to effectively maintain the outdoor dumpsters effecting 70 residents, resulting in the increased potential for odors and the attraction of pests and rodents. Findings include: On 4/17/2024 at 10:20 AM it was observed that 2 dumpsters, 1 trash dumpster and 1 cardboard boxes dumpster didn't have the lids closed. On 4/17/2024 at 1:32 PM, it was observed with Maintenance Assistant (MA) I that the same trash dumpster and cardboard boxes dumpster lids were not closed. MA I stated that the door to close the trash dumpster was stuck and he was not able to close the lid. MA I was able to close the cardboard boxes dumpster lid. On 4/17/2024 at 2:05 PM, Maintenance Director (MD) J stated that he wasn't aware that the trash dumpster lid didn't close until MA I told him. MD J said that MA I' told him that the frame was bent so he might have to call the dumpster company to come and fix it. When asked who makes sure the dumpster lids are shut, MD J said that anyone that uses it should shut it and stated, I close it a lot. On 4/17/2024 at 3:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by other residents for 7 residents (R56, R62, R103, R104, R105, R106, R107) out of 13 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect, resulting in the potential for physical harm, pain and mental anguish. Findings: During an revisit investigation, Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) since the facility's stated date of compliance (5/14/2024) revealed there were 6 resident-to-resident abuse incidents. Each incident occurred between residents living on the secure unit and are summarized as follows: -In the evening on 5/28/2024 R105 was observed slapping R104's leg and saying, She's in my bed, get out. The nurse on duty at the time heard a commotion but did not witness the resident-to-resident abuse. The other CNA working on the secure unit at the time did not witness the incident. The residents were separated and placed on 15-minute checks. The facility changed rooms for R105. -In the afternoon on 5/29/2024 around shift change a laundry aide near the 500-hall lounge on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient levels of nursing staff to meet resident needs for three residents (Resident #13, #59, and #62), resulting in allegations of sexual abuse, fall with fracture, and the potential for unmet care needs and facility residents to not attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident #13(R13) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R13 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer, heart disease, heart failure, pacemaker, hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebral vascular accident, frequent falls, anxiety and depression . The MDS reflected R13 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 8 which indicated his ability to make daily decisions was moderately impaired. Resident #62(R62) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R62 was a [AGE] year…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for three (Resident #13, #59 and #62) of 5 reviewed, resulting in allegations of sexual abuse that were not reported to the State Agency and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported. Findings include: Review of the facility, Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated 9/9/22, reflected, Each guest/resident shall be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. Abuse shall include freedom from verbal, mental, sexual, physical abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience that are not required to treat the guest's/resident's medical symptoms .Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a guest/resident .Sexual abuse includes, but is not limited to: unwanted intimate touching of any kind especially of breasts or perineal area; all types of sexual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of residents and thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse that involved 3 residents (Resident #13, #59 and #62) of 5 reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for further abuse to occur and allegations of abuse not being thoroughly investigated. Findings include: Review of the facility, Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated 9/9/22, reflected, Each guest/resident shall be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. Abuse shall include freedom from verbal, mental, sexual, physical abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience that are not required to treat the guest's/resident's medical symptoms .Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a guest/resident .Sexual abuse includes, but is not limited to: unwanted intimate touching of any kind especially of breasts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for 1 (Resident #56) of 18 residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs and impaired wound healing/wound deterioration. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #56 (R56) was initially admitted to facility on 11/14/22 with ongoing diagnoses including unspecified dementia, adult failure to thrive, difficulty in walking, generalized muscle weakness, and pressure ulcer of right heel. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/11/24 reflected that R56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 7 (severe cognitive impairment). Section M of the same MDS revealed that R56 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, had an unhealed facility acquired stage 3 pressure ulcer, and was not on a turning/repositioning program. Review of R56's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened medications were appropriately labeled and that expired medications were disposed of in 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for labeling and storage, resulting in the potential for decreased medication efficacy and adverse side effects. Findings include: On 4/17/24 at 8:00 AM, Oak Hall Medication Cart was reviewed in the presence of Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) D. During the review, an opened Lantus Solostar Insulin Pen with a pharmacy label reflecting R10's name was observed in the top left medication cart drawer. A separate label on the pen indicated, Date Opened__________Discard After 28 Days with no corresponding open date noted. RN/UM D confirmed that Lantus was an active medication for R10, that she did not know when it had been opened as lacked an open date and would be disposing of and getting a new one as had no way of knowing if the pen had been opened and used for more than the indicated 28 days. Review of R10's medical record revealed an active order, dated 12/14/2022, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake M100138378. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, document, monitor and treat for changes in condition, follow physician orders, notify physician, have effective communication with outside medical care providers, and thoroughly investigate a fall, and have complete and accurate medical records for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of a Face sheet revealed R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of dementia, diabetes, mixed incontinence, and stage III chronic kidney disease. Review of the Hospital emergency room (ER) medical records dated 7/19/23 with an arrival time of 4:49 PM for R1 revealed the reason for the visit was Altered mental status Pt (patient) has been unresponsive since 2 PM. Came in via EMS (emergency medical services) from the Nursing Home. Able to follow some commands. Nursing home staff was concerned about possible UTI (urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label medications for 1 of 2 medication rooms (Masters Unit Medication Room) and properly secure 1 of 3 medication carts (400/500 Hall Medication Cart), potentially affecting all residents admitted to the Masters Unit that receives a TB test and all residents of the 400/500 Hall (J-Wing), resulting in the potential for expired Tuberculin Protein Derivative being administered, the potential for inaccurate tuberculin test results from possible oxidation and degradation of the solution, and the potential for unauthorized access to the medication cart. Findings include: During an inspection of the Masters Unit Medication Room with Registered Nurse (RN) A on [DATE] at 05:00 PM, a vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (TB PPD) was discovered without an open date on the vial. There was date of 4/27 written on the box. RN A stated that even though the box was labeled, she did not know for sure if that was when the vial was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep kitchen equipment in a state of repair that would allow for regular use and operation of the plate warmer, and proper maintenance of the ice machine drain lines. This deficient practice has the potential to decrease food palatability/meal satisfaction and has the potential to contaminate ice inside the machine. During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 5/23/23 at 10:03 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) R revealed, the plate warmer has not been working for months. DM R further revealed, they (kitchen staff) sometimes heat the plates in the microwave to help with temperatures and food palatability. The purpose of a plate warmer is to assist in maintaining food temperatures and to aide in keeping hot foods hot while individual resident trays are prepared, placed in carts, and delivered to unit staff for residents eating in their rooms. During the initial kitchen tour on 5/23/23 at 10:03 AM, observation of submerged ice machine drain lines into a floor drain are observed. All ice machine drains require a few inches of space (known…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safeguard the confidentiality of medical records for one resident (R34), resulting in the potential for unauthorized access and the potential for the loss of resident privacy and confidentiality of their personal health information. Findings include: During an observation on 05/24/23 at 01:00 PM, the computer screen located on top of the 400/500 Hall Medication Cart was left open to R34's medication administration record (MAR), including her insulin order page. R34's name, room number, diagnoses, and medications were clearly visible to anyone walking by the medication cart. Residents were walking by the medication cart and the nurse (RN C) was in a resident's room out of sight of the medication cart. During an interview on 05/25/23 at 09:25 PM, LPN B, stated when she walks away from her medication cart, she will lock the computer screen. She stated she does this so unauthorized people cannot look at the residents' personal information on the computer screen. During an interview on 05/25/23 at 09:30 AM, RN D,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97 | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/30/2018 |
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2018 |
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/04/2025 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| PAPENDICK, KEITH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| SILVERTHORN, JAMIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/04/2024 |
| FREMONT SENIOR LEASING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2018 |
| SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/26/2018 |
| ZENITH FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| LAFLEUR, AMY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/17/2022 |
| NAGY, JEREMY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| PARKER, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| STOBB, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235176. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.