The Laurels of Chatham

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 122.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews with staff and the Medical Director the facility failed to provide care safely to a dependent resident (Resident #117). On 02/14/25 Resident #117 was sitting on a bath bench in the shower room while Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 was washing her hair when Resident #117's body suddenly went limp, and she went unresponsive. NA #1 laid Resident #117 onto the shower bench, ran approximately 10 feet away from her to yell for help, leaving Resident #117 with no staff support resulting in the resident falling off the shower bench. Resident #117 sustained a laceration to her right eyebrow with significant bleeding and bruising and a skin tear to her right elbow. Resident #117 was prescribed an anticoagulant (blood thinner) daily for blood clot prevention. This deficient practice affected 1 of 5 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent falls. The findings included: Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnosis included fracture of sacrum, aneurysm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews with the Orthopedic Physician Assistant, Orthopedic Nurse, Wound Physician Assistant, Medical Director, Hospice Aide, and staff, the facility failed to assess Resident #102's skin under an immobilizer used following a fractured distal femur (the area of the leg just above the knee joint). This resulted in the development of an unstageable (full thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by eschar (dry, dark scab of dead skin), slough (yellow tissue that is stringy and thick) and granulation tissue (part of the healing process in which lumpy, pink tissue containing new connective tissue and capillaries form around the edges of the wound) pressure ulcer to the right inner ankle. The facility also failed to transcribe and provide protective skin care to a recently healed pressure ulcer (Resident #92). This deficient practice affected 2 of 7 residents reviewed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and Paramedic and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's (Resident #117) dignity when her nude body was left uncovered until after Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived following a fall on the shower room floor. EMS covered the residents' body upon their arrival. A reasonable person would not want to be left with their nude body fully exposed and would have experienced feelings such as embarrassment or humiliation. This deficient practice affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings included: Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #117's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated her cognition was intact. Resident #117 required moderate assistance with shower/bath and transfers. Resident #117's incident report dated 02/14/25 at 9:20 PM, completed by Nurse #6, indicated Resident #117 had a fall while being assisted by Nurse Aide (NA) #1 in the shower room when she lost consciousness and collapsed onto…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II referral was made after a resident was given new mental health diagnoses for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for PASRR. The findings included: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a PASRR level I was completed. A level II PASRR was halted on 5/21/24 due to dementia being the primary diagnoses without a diagnosis of mental illness. The resident was diagnosed with unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or physiological condition on 10/03/24. He had been placed on Nuplazid (an antipsychotic medication) 34 milligrams with a start date of 09/30/24. There was no documentation regarding a new level II PASRR request in Resident #68's chart after the new mental health diagnosis. Review of Resident #68's most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed the resident to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with staff and Medical Director, the facility failed to thoroughly assess Resident #117, who had a do not resuscitate order and was prescribed an anticoagulant (blood thinner) daily for blood clot prevention, after she went unresponsive during a shower and after a fall that resulted in injury. On [DATE] Resident #117 was sitting on a bath bench in the shower room while Nursing Aide (NA) #1 was washing her hair. Resident #117 took a deep breath, her body suddenly went limp, and she went unresponsive. NA #1 laid Resident #117 onto the shower bench, ran approximately 13 feet away from her to yell for help, leaving Resident #117 with no staff support resulting in the resident falling off the shower bench. In the minutes after the medical event and fall and before emergency medical services (EMS) arrived, Nurse #6 did not perform a head-to-toe assessment, check vital signs including pulse from the carotid artery, check range of motion or assess pain. Resident #117 was not turned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer water flushes via a feeding tube at the physician ordered flow rate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with tube feedings (Resident #101). The findings included: Resident #101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and presence of a feeding tube. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #101 had moderate cognitive impairment with no behaviors noted. He was coded as receiving 51% or more of his total calories through a tube feeding and an average fluid intake of 501 cubic centimeters (cc) per day or more by tube feeding. Resident #101's active care plan, last reviewed 5/19/25, revealed a focus area for an enteral feeding tube to meet nutritional needs. The interventions included providing water as ordered. Resident #101's active physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow sterile technique when Nurse #5 failed to apply sterile gloves for suctioning while providing tracheostomy care for 1 of 2 residents observed for tracheostomy care (Resident #38). The findings included: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, and tracheostomy. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment tool dated 4/7/25 indicated Resident #38 was severely cognitively impaired. She was coded for using oxygen, a tracheostomy, and suctioning. A review of Resident #38's orders revealed an order dated 7/1/24 to deep suction the tracheostomy as needed for increased secretions and every shift. An observation was conducted on 7/2/25 at 10:50 AM of Nurse #5 as she provided suctioning and tracheostomy care for Resident #38. Nurse #5 washed her hands, applied clean gloves, and opened the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Nurse Practitioner and staff interviews, the facility failed to hold a blood pressure medication as ordered by the physician for 1 of 6 residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #32). The findings included: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of Resident #32's physician orders included an order dated 7/20/24 for losartan potassium-hydrochlorothiazide (a medication for high blood pressure which is also a diuretic) 50-12.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every day. Hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP-the top number in the blood pressure reading) less than 110. The March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed and revealed Resident #32 had received losartan potassium-hydrochlorothiazide, despite the SBP below 110 on the following dates: 3/4/25 SBP was 105 administered by Nurse #1. 3/9/25 SBP was 101 administered by Nurse #1. 3/12/25 SBP was 109 administered by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to resolve resident council concerns regarding call bell responses on night shift. (Resident #s 23, 41, 77), and failed to provide the residents a private resident council meeting without staff interference for 2 of 4 months reviewed (March 2024 and April 2024). Findings included: 1. Resident council meeting minutes/concern form dated 3/5/24 documented by the Activity Coordinator for new business revealed residents had to wait a long time on night shift for staff to answer call lights. The facility response was call bells were to be answered within 3 to 5 minutes. It was everyone's responsibility to answer call bells. If you cannot assist a guest, leave the light on. Resident council meeting minutes/concern form dated 4/2/24 documented by the Activity Coordinator for new business (brought forward from the month before) revealed the Nursing Assistants (NA) on night shift 11:00 pm to 7:00 am do not provide care and round regularly. Old business from last month's minutes: residents are waiting a long time for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide stool incontinence care on night shift for a dependent resident which caused him to feel angry (Resident #59) and failed to communicate with a resident. A reasonable person expects to be provided communication during care and understand what to expect (Resident #15). This deficient practice affected 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings included: 1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of liver failure. Resident #59's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident had an intact cognition, was understood and understands others. The resident required staff assistance of one with all activities of daily living. The resident was incontinent of stool. Resident #59's care plan dated 3/29/24 documented he had an activity of daily living deficit. The resident was incontinent of stool and the interventions were to check during routine rounds and as needed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to refuse care when Nursing Assistant (NA) #5 attempted to dress the resident in a gown despite the resident's (Resident #15) physical and verbal behaviors resisting this care. This deficient practice affected 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. Findings included: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of seizure disorder and psychotic disorder with delusions. Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident had verbal behaviors 1 to 6 times per week during the 7-day look back period. The resident required assistance of one staff member for dressing. The resident was coded for refusal of care. Resident # 15's care plan had a need for crying spells and yelling out. The interventions were to approach in a quiet, calm manner, encourage participation in activities of daily living, report changes in mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews with the Orthopedic nurse, Orthopedic Physician Assistant, Responsible Party (RP) , and staff, the facility failed to notify the orthopedic provider of a newly acquired pressure ulcer caused by a knee immobilizer and that the knee immobilizer was not being worn as ordered for Resident #102's fractured distal femur (the area of the leg just above the knee joint). The facility also failed to notify the RP of the addition and increase of medication prescribed for Resident #173. This was for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for notification. The findings included: 1) Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of the right femur, bullous pemphigoid (an autoimmune disorder that causes itchy raised rashes and large blisters) and psoriasis. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated Resident #102 was to wear the well-padded knee immobilizer which could be removed for hygiene. A review of Resident #102's physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,527 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,527 — penalty dated 2024-04-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $829K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC