Laurels Of Norworth The
6830 North High Street, Worthington, OH 43085 · For profit - Corporation · 126 certified beds · (614) 888-4553 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $51,871 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.7% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.1% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.7% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.6%CMS range 37.4–59.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.8–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.2–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 118.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a resident risk management meeting document, review of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement meeting documents, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility's smoking policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #135 exhibited safe smoking practices, stored his smoking materials appropriately, and did not smoke while near oxygen. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm and/or injuries when Resident #135 lit his lighter in his room while in bed and with his supplemental oxygen on and being delivered via nasal cannula. Resident #135's oxygen ignited, resulting in second-degree burns (burns involving the first two layers of skin) that covered one-fourth of the resident's face, both nostrils, and burnt a portion of Resident #135's bedding. This affected one (#135) of five residents reviewed for smoking. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure resident smoking materials were safely secured per facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, review of wound notes, review of hospital records and policy review, the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure ulcers and failed to ensure interventions were in place as ordered to prevent new or worsening pressure ulcers for Residents #20, #10, and #30. Actual harm occurred on 12/16/25 when it was discovered that Resident #20, who was at risk for skin breakdown with no pressure ulcers upon admission, developed an avoidable facility acquired unstageable (dead or devitalized tissue that is hard or soft in texture; usually black, brown, or tan in color, and may appear scab-like. Necrotic tissue and eschar are usually firmly adherent to the base of the wound and often the sides/ edges of the wound) pressure ulcer injury to the right heel. On 01/27/26, Resident #20 developed a facility acquired unstageable pressure injury to coccyx that was previously documented as Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD). This affected three residents (Residents #20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEYBased on resident interview, medical record review, review of the self-reported incident (SRI) investigation and witness statements, review of hospital records, policy review, and review of the facility plan of correction documents, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring transfers with a medical lift was transferred safely and with two staff assistance. Actual Harm occurred on 09/02/25 when Resident #60, who was dependent upon two staff for mechanical lift transfers, was being transferred via one staff assistance in a mechanical lift. The lift fell resulting in the resident sustaining a right femur fracture and subsequent surgery. This affected one (Resident #60) of three residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The facility census was 106.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #60 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, staff interviews, physician interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility's elopement investigation, review of the police report, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision of a severely cognitively impaired resident to prevent the resident from leaving the facility unsupervised. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #113 when she went unsupervised for approximately five hours, was found 0.4 miles from the facility by a Good Samaritan, which lead to being hospitalized and treated for a closed head injury, facial laceration with stitches, hematoma of face, left knee injury, and left hand injury. This affected one (Resident #113) of one resident reviewed for supervision. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #113 revealed an admission date of 01/02/16. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #10. Actual harm occurred on 05/13/22 when Resident #10, who was severely cognitively impaired, was identified to have a Stage III (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining or tunneling), pressure ulcer to the right heel. There was no evidence the facility had adequate interventions in place to prevent the development of the ulcer. The facility failed to ensure the pressure ulcer was timely identified prior to being found as a Stage III with slough (Non-viable yellow, tan, gray, green or brown tissue; usually moist, can be soft, stringy and mucinous in texture. Slough may be adherent to the base of the wound or present in clumps throughout the wound bed.) This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, interviews, and facility job descriptions, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN's) acted within their professional standards and their scope of training related to pressure ulcer wound assessments and staging of wounds. This affected two residents (#20 and #30) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 116.1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20, revealed an admission date of 10/18/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, depression, spinal stenosis and primary generalized osteoarthritis. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 (00 to 15) indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, and total dependence on toilet hygiene, shower/bathe self, and transfers. This resident was also assessed to be frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, review of the State agency reporting system (CALS), review of emergency medical services (EMS) reports, review of police reports, review of facility emails, and policy review, the facility failed to timely report allegations of inappropriate sexual behavior made by four residents to the state agency and/or local law enforcement. This affected four residents (#33, #58, #77, #97) out of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 106.Findings include:1. Review of the record for Resident #33 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses included epilepsy, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage four (CKD4), acquired left leg absence above right knee, and depression.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #33 revealed she was moderately cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for toileting, toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, review of facility emails, review of self-reported incident investigations (SRI) and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents involving allegations of inappropriate sexual behavior. This affected two residents (#58 and #77) out of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 106.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #18's record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #18 revealed he was cognitively intact and needed partial/moderate assistance with toileting, showering and lower body dressing. Resident #18 was assessed to need supervision or touching assistance to walk 50 feet and was assessed to be independent with use of wheelchair for 50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 115 of 115 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The census was 115. Findings include: Observations on 02/13/25 from 11:46 A.M. to 12:15 P.M. revealed the following: [NAME] #215 was serving food on the serving line from the steam table, wearing disposable gloves. Each time [NAME] #215 scooped pasta into the service ladle, he would use one of his gloved hands to balance the pasta in the spoon prior to serving it on to the plate. He did not change his gloves at all during the observation period. Also, after touching the pasta each time, he touched the following items in between without changing his gloves: meal plate, multiple serving utensils of other food on the tray line, dirty steam table counter, serving trays, warming lids to the plates, soup bowl, aluminum foil covering food that was in the steamer, and a hot dog bun. Observations on 02/13/25 from 11:54 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. revealed Dietary Manager #271…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected four resident rooms (room numbers #60, #90, #215, and #226) and the northwest hallway. This had the potential to affect 54 residents residing in these resident rooms and who were near the northwest hallway. Findings include: An environmental tour was conducted on 02/13/25 between 10:15 A.M. and 11:25 A.M. with the Administrator. The following concerns were observed and verified at the time of observation with the Administrator: A. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed there was wall tile hanging loose behind toilet pipe right at the flushing component/handle, dead bugs in bathroom light fixture cover, sink faucet with steady leak/drip, and a broken window ledge (made of marble) section fractured in three small pieces that were loose and jagged. B. Observation of ceiling tiles in the northwest hall (outside room [ROOM NUMBER], in front of the egress door) sagging out of the frames near the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurate to the resident's conditions and diagnoses. This affected two (Residents #4 and #75) of three residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The facility census was 115. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 01/11/23 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction due to embolism in the right middle cerebral artery, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Updated diagnosis on 10/25/24 showed vascular dementia. Review of Resident #4's care plan, dated 01/11/23, noted a risk for impaired skin, pain, and functional ability deficits due to the diagnosis of vascular dementia. Review of the PASARR identification screen dated 02/28/23 revealed that under Section D: Medical diagnosis, question one asked, Does the individual have a diagnosis of dementia? The facility selected no. Interview on 02/13/25 at 2:16 P.M. with Social Services Assistant (SSA) #334 confirmed the PASARR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they timely followed up with state mental health agency for level two evaluation for Resident #22. This affected one (Resident #22) of four residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) identification screenings. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 04/29/23 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/06/25, revealed Resident #22 was cognitively intact. Review of the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for Resident #22 revealed a change of condition PASARR was completed on 11/14/24 with a PASARR results letter on 11/14/24 indicating level II evaluation was required. There was no evidence the level II evaluation was coordinated with the state mental health agency from 11/15/24 to to 02/12/25. Review of the progress notes for Resident #22 revealed on 02/13/25 at 10:33 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain vision services in a timely manner for Resident #60. This affected one (Resident #60) of two residents reviewed for vision. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/29/24 with diagnoses including localization-related (focal) idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with seizures of localized onset. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 did not have corrective lenses and was cognitively intact. The MDS did not trigger for visual function. Review of the progress notes revealed on 08/13/24 at 6:18 P.M., a Nurse Practitioner (NP) documented Resident #60 needed an eye exam and new glasses to address vision impairment, which could contribute to fall risks. On 08/15/24 at 4:02 P.M., a nurse contacted Optometry #500 to schedule an appointment. Review of the after-visit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately monitor the resident's significant weight loss and timely follow the registered dietitian's recommendations and facility policy. This affected two (Residents #87 and #94) of six residents reviewed for nutrition monitoring. The facility census was 115. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, diverticulosis of small and large intestines and clostridium difficile (C-diff). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/24, revealed Resident #94 was cognitively intact. Resident #94's was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], following a hospitalization. Review of the Resident #94's weights, dated 12/07/24 to 02/10/25, revealed the following weights: 12/13/24 at 132.2 pounds (lbs)), 01/09/25 at 119.0 lbs., 02/06/25 at 114.8 lbs., and 02/10/25 at 114.0 lbs. There was no weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide planning, treatment, and oversight to resident behaviors regarding catheter care. This affected one (Resident #62) of one resident reviewed for behavior monitoring. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome, bipolar disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, and post traumatic stress disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/22/24, revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact. Review of the current physician orders for February 2025 revealed Resident #62 had an order to have a straight catheter procedure to be complete every six hours. Review of Resident #62's current behavioral care plan revealed no documentation, interventions, or plans related to Resident #62's behavior of performing his own straight catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide parameters for as needed pain medication. This affected one (Resident #62) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegia and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/22/24, revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #62's physician orders, dated December 2024 to February 2025, revealed an order for acetaminophen 650 milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed (PRN) for pain or fever. Also, there was an order for Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 15 mg every four hours as needed for pain. Neither medication had parameters as to which pain medication should be administered and what pain level each medication should be given at. Review of Resident #62's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors and did not provide appropriate justification for a psychotropic medication for one (Resident #80) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 115. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 10/03/24 with diagnoses including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #80 had severe cognitive impairment, and documentation of verbal behaviors. Review of the physician orders for Resident #80 revealed the following medication: Seroquel (Quetiapine Fumarate) 50 milligrams (mg) - Administered twice daily for vascular dementia behaviors, ordered on 10/31/24 with no stop date. Ativan (Lorazepam) 0.5 mg - Administered every four hours as needed for anxiety and agitation, with multiple renewal orders from 11/12/24 through 02/12/25. Trazodone HCl 50 mg -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, observation , review of policy, and review of the resident agreement, the facility failed to timely obtain routine dental services for residents. This affected two (Resident #60 and Resident #103) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 115. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #103 revealed an admission date of 12/10/24 with diagnoses of epilepsy, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, mild cognitive impairment, and personal history of transient ischemic attack. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 12/17/24 revealed Resident #103 had moderate cognitive impairment and Resident #103 has no natural teeth or tooth fragments. Review of the care plan dated 12/12/24 revealed Resident #103 was at risk for infection, pain, or bleeding in the oral cavity. Resident #103 has no teeth present, and dentures were at home. Interventions included dental consult as needed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facilities infection control log, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to to follow appropriate antibiotic stewardship protocols. This affected two (Residents #39 and #90) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 115. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, paraplegia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/27/25, revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #39's physician orders, dated October and November 2024, revealed the following antibiotics were ordered and administered: Hiprex one gram (gm) for prophylaxis, Amoxicillin 875-125 milligrams (mg) twice daily for wound infection for seven days starting on 11/23/24, bactrim 800-160 mg twice daily for prevention for 10 days starting on 11/25/24, and Doxycycline 100 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared in a manner to maintain nutritive value. This affected one (#46) of three residents reviewed for diet orders. The facility identified two residents with physician ordered pureed diets. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 08/02/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarct (stroke), epilepsy, malnutrition, dementia and heart disease. Review of a physician order dated 08/02/24 revealed Resident #46 had an order for pureed diet. Review of the care plan dated 08/02/24 revealed Resident #46 had a nutritional risk related to mechanically altered diet and requiring assistance with meals. Interventions included to provide diet as ordered (regular diet, puree texture.) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was severely cognitively impaired and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of a dietary meal ticket and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure diet textures were served per physician orders. This affected one (#77) of three residents reviewed for diet orders. The facility identified two residents with physician ordered pureed diets. The facility census was 112. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 10/03/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, failure to thrive, vascular dementia, pneumonia muscle weakness and dysphasia. Review of the care plan dated 10/03/24 revealed Resident #77 had a nutritional risk related to mechanically altered/therapeutic diet and required assistance with meals. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision/touching assistance with eating. The assessment also revealed the resident received a mechanically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, review of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow infection prevention guidelines for EBP when staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). This affected one (#28) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/18/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and gastrostomy status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/27/24, revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. Further review revealed Resident #28 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and used a feeding tube. Review of a physician order dated 08/01/24 revealed Resident #28 had an order to cleanse percutaneious endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (feeding tube placed through the stomach wall) site with wound cleanser and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain resident consent prior to searching a resident's personal possessions and removing personal items without resident knowledge. This affected one (#26) of three residents reviewed for personal property. The facility census was 108. Findings included: Review of the medical record review for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 10/27/23. Medical diagnoses included traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, paraplegia, and neurogenic bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was assessed as cognitively intact. Resident #26 was independent for eating, independent for bed mobility, dependent for transfers, and substantial/maximal assistance for toileting. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed a note dated 02/17/24 that the resident returned from a hospital visit. Interview with Resident #26 on 03/11/24 at 10:30 A.M. revealed, while he was in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to medications were maintained in a safe and secure manner. This affected one (#26) of one residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 108. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 10/27/23. Medical diagnoses included traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, paraplegia, and neurogenic bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as cognitively intact. Resident #26 was independent for eating, independent for bed mobility, dependent for transfers, and required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed no assessment was completed for self-administration of medications. Observation on 03/11/24 at 10:43 A.M. revealed a medication cup with medications inside of it on Resident #26's bedside table in the resident's room. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of exterminator reports, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to act upon exterminator recommendations and maintain the facility to control mice and ants. This affected 12 (#3, #18, #26, #27, #34, #42, #48, #60, #64, #83, #89, and #90) and had the potential to affect all the individuals in the home. The census was 112. Findings include: Interview on 08/18/23 at 4:05 P.M., with Resident #83 revealed he thought he saw a mouse in his room about a month ago. Interview on 08/18/23 at 4:08 P.M., with Resident #64 revealed he saw a mouse in his room around 3:00 A.M. about a month and a half ago. Interview on 08/18/23 at 4:10 P.M., with Resident #89 revealed he saw a mouse outside. Interview on 08/18/23 at 4:12 P.M., with Resident #3 revealed she saw mice in her room a few days ago around the trash can. She told the nurse and two were caught. Interview on 08/18/23 at 4:14 P.M., with Resident #90 revealed she saw some mice in her room about a week ago. They caught two on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of work orders, review of facility map, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain safe, clean, sanitary resident rooms. This affected 62 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #7, #11, #12, #15, #17, #18, #22, #24, #25, #26, #27, #30, #31, #32, #33, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40, #42, #45, #46, #47, #50, #53, #54, #56, #57, #59, #65, #68, #69, #71, #75, #76, #78, #79, #83, #84, #85, #86, #87, #88, #89, #94, #97, #100, #101, #102, #104, #105, #109, #110, #113, #115, and #116) of 112 residents in the facility. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Observation on 08/18/23 between 4:37 P.M. and 6:15 P.M., of the resident rooms with the Administrator revealed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER]: the wall behind the beds needs patched and painted. room [ROOM NUMBER]: the wall by the air conditioner and below the picture to the right of the window needed painted. Both sides of the wall by bed A needed painted. room [ROOM NUMBER]: had a towel on the floor under the air conditioner to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure four residents ((#10, #31, #37 and #73), who were dependent on staff received care in the area of nail care and showers. This affected four of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 114. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 12/30/21 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, adult failure to thrive, encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, anxiety disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances and psychosis. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech, sometimes understands others, and has a severe cognitive deficit. The resident required extensive assistance of one for personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 12/30/21 revealed the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, facility policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents smoking materials were stored in a safe and secure manner. This affected five residents (#74, #67, #16, #57, and #14) of five residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 114. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 05/02/17. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), abnormalities of gait and mobility, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, schizoaffective disorder, tremor, and solitary pulmonary nodule. Review of the plan of care dated 12/01/21 revealed the resident had a potential risk of violating the smoking policy. Interventions included random checks of the resident's room as needed or indicated. Review of the Smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a safe smoker, followed smoking guidelines per facility policy, and returned smoking materials to the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, interview of facility staff, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered with a nurse at bed side and medications were stored in a safe and secure manner affecting two residents (#17, #74 ) out of four residents reviewed and failed to ensure that one medication cart was locked in patient care area. This had the potential to affect twelve residents ( #03, #06, #20, #21, #24, #35, #47,#50, #55, #59, #91, and #109) who were confused ,ambulatory, and wheelchair bound that propel independently. The facility census was 114. Findings Included: 1. Review of medical record revealed Resident #17 admission date of 10/06/21. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety, obstructive sleep apnea, and psychoactive substance abuse. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated on 04/13/22 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 that indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident required for assistance supervision with one-person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control and isolation precaution procedures regarding personal protective equipment (PPE) usage, incontinence care, and hand washing and did not disinfect the glucometer. This affected nine (Resident #365, #366, #367, #368, #73, #77, #88, #31, and #10) of 25 residents reviewed during the annual survey. In addition, the facility failed to cleanse a glucometer after use on one resident (#61) , which had the potential to affect five residents whom the facility identified as residing on unit three and utilizing the glucometer. The census was 114. Findings Include: 1. Observations on 07/11/22 from 11:51 A.M. to 11:57 A.M. revealed two State Tested Nursing Aides (STNA) walking into four separate rooms, who were on contact/droplet isolation precautions, without proper PPE. On 07/11/22 at 11:51 A.M., STNA #734 walked into Resident #365 room with only a mask and face shield on to provide a lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure contracted hospice documentation was available as part of the resident's medical record. This affected one (Resident #33) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 114. Findings Include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an initial admission date 06/19/17 with the diagnoses of COPD, bipolar disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances, CHF, hypertensive heart disease, anorexia, protein-calorie malnutrition, senile degeneration of brain, anemia, H/O COVID-19, thyrotoxicosis with diffuse goiter. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech, understood others, made herself understood and had a severe cognitive deficit. Review of the mood and behavior revealed the resident rejected care. The resident required extensive assistance of one with bed mobility and was independent with eating after set-up help. The assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#31) received incontinence care in a timely manner. This affected one of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#42) indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was positioned to promote optimal draining. This affected one of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 114. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 11/01/21 with the diagnoses of anemia, orthostatic hypotension, chronic kidney disease, dementia, hypothyroidism, depression, protein-calorie malnutrition, cardiomegaly, chronic pain, osteoporosis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis, abnormal weight loss, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), anxiety disorder, tremor and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record, observation, interview of staff, and policy, the facility failed to ensure that tracheostomy residents had the correct supplies. This affected one resident (#17) out of three tracheostomy residents reviewed. The facility census was 114. Findings Included: Review of medical record revealed Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 10/06/21. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety, obstructive sleep apnea, and psychoactive substance abuse. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated on 04/13/22 revealed resident was cognitively intact. Resident required for assistance supervision with one-person physical assist with bed mobility, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident required supervision setup help only for dressing, and transfers. Resident required setup help for all meals. Resident plan of care dated on 07/14/22 revealed resident was at risk for difficulty in breathing and risk for respiratory complications related to acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed provide appropriate parameters to ensure as needed pain medication was given in a consistent manner. This affected one (Resident #35) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 114. Findings Include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were encephalopathy, chronic respiratory failure, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, type II diabetes, hypertensive heart disease, esophagitis, tracheostomy status, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, depression, cognitive communication deficit, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/06/22, revealed he had a significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #35 medical records revealed he had a physician order for Morphine 15 milligrams (mg), 0.5 tablet every four hours as needed for moderate pain. Also, he had a physician order for Morphine 15 mg, one table every four hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, facility staff interview, policy review and manufacture administration directions, the facility failed to administer medication according to physicians order for one resident (#61) of five residents observed during medication pass, and failed to properly administer medication using an insulin pen for one resident (#61) of one resident observed receiving insulin. This resulted in a medication error rate of nine percent. The total facility census was 114. Findings Include: Observation of Resident #61 receiving medication on 07/13/22 at 8:31 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #500 administered the following medications to Resident #61: Aricept (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) 10 milligram (mg), escitalopram (antidepressant)10 mg, Pepcid (H2 Blocker) 20 mg, Lantus (Antidiabetic) 10 units via insulin pen, and Humalog (Antidiabetic) 2 units via insulin pen. During the observation of the medication preparation for the insulin administration the LPN verified the correct resident insulin pens were obtained, and then dialed the pen to the dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed provide the appropriate diet to meet a residents needs. This affected one (Resident #73) of five residents reviewed for food. The census was 114. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 08/17/21. Diagnoses included type II Diabetes (DM2), hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage I through stage IV chronic kidney disease (CKD), CKD stage III, thoracic region spondylosis with myelopathy, dementia, wedge compression fracture of the first lumbar vertebra, encephalopathy, personal history of COVID-19. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/21/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 (no impairment). The resident required extensive assistance of one to two or more staff members for all Activities of daily Living (ADL's) except eating which she required set up and was independent. Review of the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all call lights were functioning appropriately. This affected one (Resident #27) of one call lights attempted for functionality. The census was 114. Findings Include: Observations on 07/11/22 from 2:55 P.M. to 3:05 P.M. revealed surveyor pushing Resident #27 call light button five times; the call light did not activate the light above her entry door to her room, and it did not activate the light inside the room as well. The call light was plugged into the wall appropriately; the call light was simply not activating the signal to let others know she needed assistance. Director of Nursing and Plant and Maintenance Director #791 walked into Resident #27 room at approximately 3:05 P.M., both attempted to activate the call light, and it did not work for them either. Plant and Maintenance Director #791 left the room to get a new call light cord. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored correctly and not expired. This affected 111 of 113 residents who receive food from the kitchen (Residents #15 and #54 receive nothing by mouth). The facility census was 113. Findings Include: 1. Observation on of the dry storage area in the kitchen on 12/09/19 at 9:33 A.M. revealed a bag of flour open, uncovered, and exposed to the air. Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #172 on 12/09/19 at 9:33 A.M. verified the bag of flour was open, uncovered, and exposed to the air. 2. Observation of the reach in refrigerator on 12/09/19 at 9:36 A.M. revealed an undated container of applesauce. Interview with DM #172 on 12/09/19 at 9:36 A.M. verified the container of applesauce was undated. 3. Observation of the kitchen on 12/11/19 at 11:22 A.M. revealed an unopened bag of white bread with a best by date of 12/03/19 next to the tray line. The observation further revealed an opened bag of white bread with a best by date of 12/03/19 on the wooden prep table next to the stove.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of manufactures instructions for cleaning glucometers, review of Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) recommendations, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly cleanse a glucometer device. This had the potential to affect 24 Residents (#4, #9, #10, #27, #29, #33, #37, #40, #44, #47, #50, #56, #65, #75, #80, #82, #83, #100, #102, #103, #104, #105, #260 and #309) of 113 residents the facility identified as using the glucometer device. The facility also failed to wear appropriate personal protection equipment (PPE) when providing wound care to a resident on contact isolation. This affected one Resident (#259) of three residents the facility identified as being on contact isolation. Lastly, the facility failed to post a sign outside one Resident's (#100) of three the facility identified who was n contact isolation. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Observation of medication administration on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly prepare pureed consistency vegetables. This had a potential to affect all eight residents (Resident #8, #24, #28, #65, #73, #91, #208 and #310) on a pureed diet. The facility census was 113. Findings Include: Observation in the kitchen on 12/11/19 at 11:28 A.M. revealed [NAME] #170 remove pureed vegetables from the oven. The pureed vegetables were observed to be semi-solid and brownish around the bottom and edges of the container. [NAME] #170 proceeded to transfer the pureed vegetables and brownish semi-solid pieces into a new container. [NAME] #170 then proceeded to stir the pureed vegetables and brownish semi-solid pieces together until surveyor intervened and showed [NAME] #170 the semi-solid brownish pieces that were not of a pureed consistency. Interview with [NAME] #170 on 12/11/19 at 11:28 A.M. verified the semi-solid brownish pieces stirred within the pureed vegetables were not of pureed consistency. The interview further revealed [NAME] #170 had not noticed the semi-solid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview with residents and staff, medical record review and review of facility policies, the facility failed to maintain dignity for two residents. This affected two (Resident #2 and #54) of 23 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dementia, recurrent depressive disorder, anxiety, and contracture of the left knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/26/19, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with dressing. The resident did not reject care. Observation on 12/09/19 at 11:40 A.M. revealed Resident #54 was in a hospital gown watching television in her wheelchair in her room. Interview on 12/09/19 at 11:41 A.M. with State-Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #80…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #72's advance directive (code status) was accurately reflected in the medical record. This affected one (#72) of 23 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders, dated [DATE], revealed an order for a code status of Do Not Resuscitate(DNR)/Comfort Care (CC). (A DNR order indicates that a person will not receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event his or her heart stops beating. A DNRCC requires that only comfort measures be administered before, during, or after a person's heart or breathing stops).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview with residents, legal representatives and staff, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care conferences occurred quarterly for two residents. This affected two (Resident #54 and #100) of 23 residents reviewed for timely care conferences. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dementia, dysphagia, recurrent depressive disorder, anxiety, and contracture of the left knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/26/19, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. The last documented care conference in the resident's medical record was 06/13/19. Telephone interview on 12/10/19 at 12:49 P.M. with Resident #54's court-appointed Guardian revealed he had not been invited to nor attended a care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, interview with facility staff, review of the facility's activity calendar and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the activity needs were met for one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for activity needs. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility 09/10/14. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/02/19, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance from staff with all activities of daily living except eating. Review of the comprehensive annual MDS assessment, dated 02/15/19, revealed it was important for her to do things with groups of people and participating in her favorite activities. Review of the care plan, last revised 08/01/19, revealed she had potential for impaired social interaction or social isolation related to depression and impaired cognition. The care plan stated her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer oxygen per physician orders, date and label oxygen administration tubing and humidification bottle to prevent contamination, and failed to obtain a physician order for a resident to receive oxygen. This affected three (Resident #72, #82 and #103) of nineteen residents the facility identified as being on oxygen. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician order, dated 11/04/19, revealed an order for oxygen (O2) at four liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC) every shift. Review of the care plan, dated 11/05/19, revealed the resident had a potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely physician-ordered dental arrangements and services for one (Resident #4) of one resident reviewed for dental concerns. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility 09/10/14. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, type two diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/01/19, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance from staff with personal hygiene. Review of a physician progress note, dated 03/21/19, revealed Resident #4 had bleeding gums, likely secondary to dental caries, gingivitis. The physician stated she would likely require multiple tooth extractions. Review of Resident #4's in-facility dental consult note, dated 03/21/19 and a physician order dated 03/21/19, revealed she was to have three teeth extracted by a dentist in the community. Review of a physician telephone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-02-19 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the social worker had the proper qualifications of one year of supervised social work experience in a health care setting for a facility with 126 beds. This had the potential to affect all 115 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Social Worker (SW) #291 revealed a hire date of 01/09/23. SW #291 has received her Masters in Social Work (MSW) but there was no evidence that she has had one year of supervised healthcare experience. The personnel file included a reference check from Long Term Care (LTC) Facility #1 where LSW #291 held a Social Services Director position. On the reference check, there was no indication of whether or not SW #291 was supervised during this experience. Interview on 02/18/25 at 9:23 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed SW #291 was hired when the previous Administrator was working and they would know if she was hired with supervised experience but were unable to reach them to confirm. She stated there was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$51,871 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $37,191 — penalty dated 2024-03-25
- $14,680 — penalty dated 2023-10-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/01/2016 |
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2016 |
| STOBB, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2016 |
| LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANY | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2016 |
| HAUBER, CASSIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/05/2024 |
| JAHAN, ISHRAT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| ZENITH FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $665K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365222. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.