No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Laurels Of Mt Vernon The

13 Avalon Road, Mount Vernon, OH 43050 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (740) 397-3200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 397-3200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
507 Wooster Rd · (740) 397-7550 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
69 Sychar Rd · (740) 397-0145 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.3 mi
1545 Coshocton Ave · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Sychar Rd · (740) 393-9501 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.7%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.1%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.7%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.6%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit25.9%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.521.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.941.801.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
37.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.5%CMS range 35.5–56.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 8.8–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.4–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
53.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 84.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-06)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to privacy. This affected one resident (Resident #83) out of three residents reviewed for increased staff supervision. The facility census was 84.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 12/04/24 with diagnoses of borderline personality disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and insomnia.Review of the care plan dated 07/10/25 revealed Resident #83 had potential for mood fluctuations related to major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, and a history of amputation. Interventions included observing and reporting concerns to the physician, providing one to one monitoring if the resident expressed a desire to harm self or others, following suicide protocol, and notifying the physician.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 is cognitively intact and rejects care one to three days each week.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, schedule review, activity calendar review and interviews, the facility failed to provide comprehensive, resident centered services to ensure dementia care needs were met and promote resident well-being on the specialty unit. This affected two residents (Resident #18 and #24) and had the potential to affect the remaining 20 residents (#1, #2, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #25, and #27) who resided on the specialty care dementia unit. The facility census was 86.Findings include: Review of the staffing schedules revealed on 07/30/25, 07/31/25, and 08/01/25 there was one certified nursing assistant (CNA) and one nurse scheduled to work on the memory care unit. An observation on 08/06/25 at 8:41 A.M. revealed Resident #24 was sitting at a table with a large amount of oatmeal on the underside of her right sweater sleeve. The oatmeal was smeared on the table as the resident moved her arm. At the time of the observation, the nurse was at the nurse's station and the CNA was giving residents showers.An additional observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the abuse policy and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee policy, and interview, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to communicate and coordinate with the QAPI program regarding situations of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This affected four residents (#1, #2, #14, and #24) and had the potential to affect all 86 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 86.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of an incident and accident investigation form revealed on 06/06/25 at 5:00 P.M. Resident #1 was holding onto Resident #2 in the memory care unit before the supper meal. When staff asked Resident #1 to let go of Resident #2, Resident #1 shoved Resident #2 as she let go. Resident #2 fell backwards.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, review of facility investigations, review of the abuse policy, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for Residents #1, #2, #14, and #24. This affected four (Residents #1, #2, #14, and #24) out of six residents reviewed for abuse investigations. The facility census was 86.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. A nurse's note dated 06/06/25 at 6:07 P.M. revealed Resident #1 had a hold of another resident's (Resident #2) arm. A certified nurse assistant (CNA) asked Resident #1 multiple times to let go of Resident #2's arm. When Resident #1 decided to let go of Resident #2, Resident #1 pushed Resident #2 on the floor. Resident #2 fell and hit her head on the floor.Review of self-reported incident (SRI) #261328 dated 06/06/25 revealed Resident #1 was observed holding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise plans to provide comprehensive, resident centered care related to agitation and/or aggression. This affected two (Resident #1 and #24) of six residents reviewed. The facility census was 86. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. A care plan dated 05/19/23 revealed Resident #1 was at risk for decline in cognition and had impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes related to impaired decision making, and impulsivity. Interventions included provide a homelike environment and notify the nurse of any changes in cognitive function.A care plan dated 06/19/24 revealed Resident #1 had an actual behavior problem of hoarding food items such as sour cream, cream cheese, butter and salad dressings in her nightstand. Interventions included, if reasonable, discuss the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete neurological checks for Resident #2 after two falls with injuries occurred. This affected one (Resident #2) out of six residents reviewed for incidents with injuries. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but limited to dementia, degenerative disease of nervous system, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder.A change in condition note dated 06/05/25 at 9:16 A.M. revealed Resident #2 was found sitting on the floor in her room. Neurological checks were completed as Resident #2 would allow. A change in condition note dated 06/06/25 at 4:34 P.M. revealed Resident #2 was pushed to the floor by Resident #1. Resident #2 hit the back of her head on the floor. Resident #2 had a laceration to the back of her head. Pressure was applied to the back of Resident #2's head and Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the smoking area was maintained in a clean and safe manner. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents. Findings include: Observation on 02/03/25 at 12:03 P.M. of the smoking area located in the courtyard revealed a smoking area not maintained properly. There were numerous cigarette butts located on the ground and not in the designated ashtrays. Observation on 02/06/25 at 9:18 A.M. with the Administrator revealed that there were approximately 25 cigarette butts around the courtyard and a pile of cigarette butts that looked like someone dumped an ashtray on the ground. Interview on 02/06/25 at 9:18 A.M. with the Administrator verified the condition of the smoking area located in the courtyard. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Smoking Policy, revealed the facility permits smoking in the designated area outside the facility, compliant with state regulations. Review of the facility document revealed the facility did not implement the policy.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of medications manufactures guidelines, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medication was dated and discarded properly. This affected six residents (Resident #12, Resident #39, Resident #48, Resident #136, Resident #139, and Resident #290) out of 22 residents reviewed for medication storage and had the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 02/05/25 at 9:00 A.M. observation of the medication storage area for the 300-400 hall revealed the following: Resident #12 had an opened bottle of Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) solution 20 milligrams per milliliter (MG/ML), give 0.25 ml by mouth every hour as needed for pain. Per the pharmacy label, the medication was dispensed on 01/24/25 however, the bottle was not dated when it was opened. Resident #39 had Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) solution 20 milligrams per MG/ML, give 0.25 ml by mouth every hour as needed for pain. Per the pharmacy label, the medication was dispensed on 01/25/25, however the bottle was not dated when opened. On 02/06/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for Resident #15, #16, #27, and #73. This four residents (#15, #16, #27, and #73) our of 19 residents reviewed for environment. Findings include: Observation on 02/03/25 at 10:30 A.M. revealed that Resident #73's privacy curtain had black marks and blue stains on it. This was verified by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #260 on 02/03/25 at 10:31 A.M. An environmental tour was conducted with the Administrator on 02/06/25 between 9:03 A.M. and 9:30 A.M. which revealed the rooms belonging to Residents #15, #16, and #27 contained privacy curtains that were stained to various degrees by unknown substances. These findings were observed and verified by the Administrator during the environmental tour. Review of the housekeeping schedule revealed that resident rooms are scheduled to be deep cleaned every 30 to 45 days.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of fall investigations, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the residents guardian was notified of all falls. This affected two (Resident #39 and #76) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility 07/30/24. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, Alzheimer's Dementia, mood disorder, psychosis, restlessness, agitation, anxiety, suicidal ideation's and major depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS( dated 11/06/24 revealed her cognition was not intact. She required set up or clean up assistance with eating, supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, and partial/moderate assistance with toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. Resident identified as having falls without major injury. Review of the fall assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, revealed the facility failed to ensure accuracy of assessments. This affected one (Resident #47) of two residents reviewed for dental assessments. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #47 revealed they were admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, acute kidney failure, viral hepatitis C, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, was independent with eating, turning and reposition, required supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing/showering, dressing and personal hygiene, with no obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Observation on 02/03/25 at 3:49 P.M. revealed his lower teeth were broken and missing with decay of teeth. Interview on 02/05/25 at 2:04 P.M. with Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #47's dental needs. This affected one (Resident #47) of two residents reviewed for dental care. Findings include: Review of Resident #47 revealed they were admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, acute kidney failure, viral hepatitis C, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, was independent with eating, turning and reposition, required supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing/showering, dressing and personal hygiene, with no obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed no evidence the facility developed a comprehensive care plan for dental care. Observation on 02/03/25 at 3:49 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure reduction interventions were in place at all times for Resident #53. This affected one resident (Resident #53) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 01/07/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to injury of left Achilles tendon, muscle wasting, and bradycardia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had moderately impaired cognition, required dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs) and had a surgical wound. Review of the care plan dated 01/08/25 revealed Resident #53 was at risk for impaired skin integrity. Interventions included but not limited to encourage to float heels while in bed and assist as needed. Review of the physician's orders for February 2025 revealed an order for heel elevation boots to bilateral feet while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #60. This affected one resident (Resident #60) of one reviewed for falls. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 10/21/23 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, obstructive uropathy, chronic kidney disease stage four, osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #60 dated 10/26/23 revealed Resident #60 was at risk for fall related injury and falls related to muscle weakness with limited mobility and end stage renal disease (ERSD), psychoactive medication use antidepressant for depression, antianxiety for anxiety. Interventions included activities to access for in-room activities and preferences, encourage the resident to wear appropriate footwear, call light within reach, commonly used items within reach, move closer to nurses' station…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure proper storage of Resident #8 and Resident #78 respiratory equipment, and failed to implement an order for a breathing improvement device for Resident #286. This affected three residents (Resident #8, Resident #78, and Resident #286) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 89. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date 11/30/18 and re-admission date 12/03/24 with the following diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), sleep apnea, and type two diabetes mellites. Resident #8 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of a possible 15. Resident #8 required assistance for completion of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) tasks including medication administration and the use of a wheelchair for mobility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological pain interventions were implemented for one resident. This affected one resident (Resident #237) out of two residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 89. Findings Include: A review of Resident #237's medical record revealed admission date of 01/15/23 with the following diagnoses including but not limited to acute kidney failure, pulmonary emboli (clot), alcohol abuse, bipolar disorder, and weakness. Resident #237 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15 dated 01/22/25. Resident #237 required assistance from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks including transfers and personal hygiene tasks. Resident #237 was non-ambulatory and used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #237's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/22/25 with a revision date of 02/04/25 for pain medication Oxycodone HCL oral tablet 10 milligrams (MG) give one tablet by mouth every four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was completed for residents. This affected one resident (Resident #237) out of five residents reviewed for use of unnecessary medications. The facility census was 89. Findings Include: A review of Resident #237's medical record revealed admission date of 01/15/23 with the following diagnoses including but not limited to bacteremia, acute kidney failure, pulmonary emboli (clot), alcohol abuse, bipolar disorder, and weakness. Resident #237 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15 dated 01/22/25. Resident #237 required assistance from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks including transfers and personal hygiene tasks. Resident #237 was non-ambulatory and used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #237's physician's history and physical progress note dated 01/21/25 authored by the facility's medical director revealed laboratory tests requested for Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, revealed the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were in place for Resident #47. This affected one (Resident #47) of two residents reviewed for dental care. The census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #47 revealed they were admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, acute kidney failure, viral hepatitis C, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact, was independent with eating, turning and reposition, required supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing/showering, dressing and personal hygiene, with no obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Observation on 02/03/25 at 3:49 P.M. revealed his lower teeth were broken and missing with decay of teeth. Interview on 02/05/25 at 2:04 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of a facility investigation, review of the facility abuse policy, and interview, the facility failed to protect from abuse Resident #87, who exhibited severe cognitive impairment (with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of two) and had the diagnoses of unspecified dementia and cognitive communication deficit. This resulted in verbal and physical abuse occurring on 04/12/24 at 7:28 P.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #655 when Resident #87 was yelled at and forcibly placed back into the wheelchair. This affected one resident (#87) of six residents reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 04/04/24 with the diagnoses including unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, depression, anxiety, and difficulty in walking. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were dated and disposed of according to industry standards. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 7:40 A.M. revealed during medication room review of the facility's second medication room refrigerator and opened multi-use vial of Aplisol Tuberculin solution without the date it was opened. The vial of Aplisol Tuberculin solution had been delivered from the pharmacy on [DATE] and had an expiration date of 09/2024. Interview on [DATE] at 7:55 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #212 confirmed the opened multi-use vial of Aplisol Tuberculin solution did not have the date it was opened, and the vial was delivered to the facility from the pharmacy on [DATE]. Review of the manufacturer's information sheet for Aplisol Tuberculin solution revealed, Vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the use of a lap buddy was assessed to be the least restrictive device for Resident #42 and failed to identify the device as a physical restraint once the resident could no longer independently remove the device on command. This affected one resident (#42) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's Disease, anxiety disorder, major depression, traumatic brain injury, and insomnia. Review of Resident #42 fall history revealed Resident #42 fell while she was pushing the empty wheelchair on 10/10/22. Following the incident, the facility fall committee implemented the use of a lap buddy (a cushion which fits into to the armrests of a wheelchair and lays across a resident's upper thighs while sitting in a wheelchair) as a fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered to treat medical conditions of Resident #59 and/or medications were administered as needed/ordered based on the resident's hemodialysis schedule. This affected one resident (#59) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 07/03/23 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic viral hepatitis C, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 had intact cognition. She was on a therapeutic diet. She was on dialysis. Review of the physician order dated 10/10/23 revealed Resident #59 had dialysis at DaVita every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. a. Review of the physician order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement fall interventions for Resident #17. This affected one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for fall interventions. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes mellites type two, sleep apnea, depression, anxiety, and breast cancer. Review of Resident #17 fall investigation dated 03/03/23 revealed Resident #17 slid out of bed and was on the floor beside the bed. Resident #17 had no injuries. Review of Resident #17's fall care plan revised on 03/03/23 revealed the intervention for the fall out of bed was to place a perimeter mattress on Resident #17's bed. Review of Resident #17's physician orders revealed a signed order dated 03/29/23 for a perimeter mattress to bed at all times, check every shift. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide timely care and interventions for Resident #183 related to a urinary tract infection (UTI). The facility also failed to provide proper oversight, assessment, and follow up of urinary catheters for Resident #60 and Resident #334. This affected one resident (#183) of four residents reviewed for UTI and two residents (#60 and #334) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Resident #183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, type II diabetes, hypertension, insomnia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, enterocolitis, chronic kidney disease (stage III), depression, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, edema, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained for Resident #46 who had significant weight loss. This affected one resident (#46) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 10/13/22 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, heart failure, depression, and dysphagia. Review of the plan of care dated 10/18/22 revealed Resident #46 was at nutritional or dehydration risk related to diagnoses, and as of 09/23/23 a significant weight gain or loss in one and three months. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, encouraging choices within ordered diet, observing for signs of dehydration, obtaining labs as ordered, obtaining weight, regular diet, supplements as ordered, and referring to dietitian as needed. Review of the quarterly Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in a clean environment. This affected one resident (#17) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes mellites type II, sleep apnea, depression, anxiety, and breast cancer. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance from staff for completion of activities of daily living (ADL) tasks including bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #17's physician's orders revealed a signed physician order dated 10/09/23 for Budesonide inhalation suspension (steroid) 0.5 milligram (mg) per milliliter (ml) to be administered 2.0 ml via nebulizer machine every twelve hours for respiratory care. Review of Resident #17's medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete pre and post dialysis assessments for Resident #59. This affected one resident (#59) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 07/03/23 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic viral hepatitis C, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 had intact cognition. She was on a therapeutic diet. She was on dialysis. Review of the plan of care dated 09/20/23 revealed Resident #59 was at risk for complications related to dialysis due to end stage renal disease. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, not using shunted arm for blood pressure, checking bruit and thrill every shift, utilizing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to comprehensively assess/provide written description of pain and provide evidence of non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering as needed pain medications for Resident #60. This affected one resident (#60) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 08/20/21 with diagnoses including other muscle spasm, type II diabetes mellitus, lymphedema, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 08/23/21 revealed Resident #60 was at risk for pain related to diagnoses, muscle spasms, and back pain. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, anticipating the residents need for pain relief, evaluating the effectiveness of pain interventions, observing for probable cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have proper justification for the use of psychotropic medication for Resident #75. This affected one resident (#75) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, degenerative disease of nervous system, amnesia, aphasia, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, insomnia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and constipation. Review of Resident #75's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #75's current physician orders revealed she was prescribed Depakote (anticonvulsant used to treat bipolar disorder) 125 milligrams (mg) twice daily for dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, homelike environment. This affected two residents (#17 and #21) of 88 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including obesity, bipolar disorder, major depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks including bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 10/16/23 at 9:25 A.M. revealed Resident #21's half of the room was nearest the window. Resident #21 uses a large bariatric bed which was in the far corner of the room beneath the light fixture. Immediately to the left side of Resident #21's bed was a wall with multiple patched areas. The wall was blue in color, and the patched areas were white in color with rough edges…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-09-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of nursing staff to ensure resident care needs and preferences were met. This had the potential to affect all 86 residents that resided in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 03/20/21 and the diagnoses of anxiety, high blood pressure, schizophrenia, insomnia, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 07/12/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene, and limited assistance of one staff for locomotion via wheelchair. Review of the care plan dated 03/24/21 revealed the resident had an ADL self care performance deficit and required assistance with ADL's and mobility related to activity intolerance, fatigue, weakness, impaired balance, pain, shortness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to complete showers per resident preference and complete nail care as needed. This affected five (#34, #35, #43, #76, and #80) out of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 03/20/21 and the diagnoses of anxiety, high blood pressure, schizophrenia, insomnia, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 07/12/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene, and limited assistance of one staff for locomotion via wheelchair. Review of the care plan dated 03/24/21 revealed the resident had an ADL self care performance deficit and required assistance with ADL's and mobility related to activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete updated Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) which included all mental health diagnoses. This affected two residents (Resident #43 and Resident #44) out of two reviewed for PASRR screenings. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/14/12 with medical diagnoses including other osteoporosis without current pathological fracture. On 07/13/17, additional medical diagnoses were added including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, delusional disorders, and other schizoaffective disorders. On 01/05/18, the resident was diagnosed with metabolic encephalopathy. Review of the PASRR screening dated 12/04/12 revealed only mood disorder was included on the review. No other medical diagnoses were included on the PASRR screening. Interview on 09/14/21 at 04:56 PM with Social Services (SS) #511 confirmed Resident #43's most recent PASRR was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to properly assess Resident #35 after a fall. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident #291 safely smoked based on the individualized smoking assessment. This affected two residents (Resident #35 and Resident #291) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 07/13/21 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. Diagnosis dated 09/08/21 included fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. Record review of Resident #35's fall assessment, dated 07/14/21, revealed the resident was at risk for fall related injury and falls related to weakness and history of falling. Review of Resident #35's care plan, dated 07/14/21, revealed the resident was at risk for fall related injury and falls related to history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete monthly pharmacy recommendations. This affected three residents (#34, #47 and #69) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 03/20/21 and the diagnoses of anxiety, high blood pressure, schizophrenia, insomnia, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was intact, and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, and limited assistance of one staff for locomotion via wheelchair. Review of Resident #34's physician orders revealed orders for Trazodone 50 milligrams (mg) at night for insomnia, Latuda 20 mg for schizophrenia, Buspirone 10 mg twice daily, Eliquis 2.5 mg twice daily for blood clot prevention, and Alprazolam 1 mg three times daily for anxiety. Review of the care plan, dated 03/26/21, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2016
KHAN, ANISIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
STOBB, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
GARCELLANO, MIRIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
GREWELL, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$497K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 6%Other / private 33%

This home reported $497K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$345per resident / day
operating cost
$10,490per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365404. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next