No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Laurels Of Gahanna

5151 North Hamilton Road, Columbus, OH 43230 · For profit - Corporation · 112 certified beds · (614) 337-1066 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (614) 337-1066 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)7 actual-harm citations$394,237 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 7 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (84) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $394,237 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-15)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
670 Meridian Way, 300 · (614) 633-8684 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.1 mi
5195 N Hamilton Rd · (614) 476-0988 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Meijer0.1 mi
5050 N Hamilton Rd · (614) 855-4900 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.5%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.6%6.1%16.1%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.0%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.0%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.6%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.3%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.7%CMS range 41.8–63.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.3–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.5–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.99
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.68
RN hoursweekends
52.0%
Total nursing turnover
45.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 102.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-03)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

84 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 67 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, family, and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an individualized skin program to ensure necessary care and services were provided to timely identify the resident's skin breakdown, including diabetic ulcers and failed to provide necessary and care services to a resident who was not to receive food by mouth due to an esophageal repair. In addition, the facility failed to provide timely care and services to a resident's chest tube drain. Actual harm occurred to Resident #37, who had a history of amputation, required substantial/maximal assistance with lower body dressing, and had a diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy when the facility failed to identify four arterial wounds the hospital had identified prior to admission. 16 days after admission, the facility identified the four arterial wounds on the right heel, left heel, right medial foot, and left medial foot had deteriorated since hospitalization. This affected one (Resident #37) of nine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), and policy review, the facility failed to accurately assess and provide timely interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers or healing of existing pressure ulcers; and failed to timely identify the resident's pressure ulcers until it reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm to Residents #37 and #117 who were at risk for pressure ulcers and dependent on staff for toileting. Resident #37 developed three unstageable pressure ulcers (Slough and/or eschar: known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar). Resident #117 developed one pressure ulcer as a stage III pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed). This affected three (Residents #37, #82, and #117) of three residents identified with in-house acquired wounds. The facility census…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #100, a newly admitted resident received hemodialysis services timely and as recommended by the hospital at the time of the resident's hospital discharge and failed to ensure timely and ongoing monitoring of the resident's hemodialysis access site for patency and/or signs of infection. This affected one resident (#100) of three residents reviewed for dialysis services. The facility census was 96. Actual harm occurred on 08/14/24 when the facility failed to ensure Resident #100 received hemodialysis treatments as ordered (between 08/10/24 and 08/14/24) resulting in an acute change in the resident's condition, including a swollen abdomen, generalized edema throughout the resident's body and presence of excessive fluid requiring transfer to the hospital for hemodialysis. The resident did not return to the facility after being transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital medical records, observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely treatment and care in response to resident's change in condition resulting in hospitalizations. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #37, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was sent to the hospital from an outside appointment on 07/18/23 due to abdominal distention and a concern for a bowel obstruction related to multiple days of having no bowel movements and no treatment. Resident #37 received a computed topography (CT) scan of her abdomen in the emergency department which revealed a bowel obstruction. A gastrointestinal (GI) consult was completed, and Resident #37 received surgery for a loop colostomy to be placed. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #6, who was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], reported to the facility staff he was having a stroke on 02/25/24 and requested to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, policy review and review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) guidelines, the facility failed to implement an effective pressure ulcer prevention and treatment program for Resident #47 and Resident #63. Actual harm occurred on 01/02/23 when Resident #47, who was mildly cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for turning and repositioning, was identified to have an open area to the buttocks. The area was not staged, and no treatment orders were implemented. On 01/05/23 the resident was assessed to have a Stage III (full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epiboly (rolled wound edges) are often present) pressure ulcer to the buttocks. The facility failed to implement effective preventive pressure ulcer interventions for the resident, failed to implement timely skin assessments, and failed to implement a treatment timely following the identification of the Stage III…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement timely interventions to decrease the risk for falls for Resident #256 who was a new admission and identified to have a history of falls and cognitive impairment. Actual harm occurred to Resident #256 when there was not a baseline care plan with fall interventions implemented, resulting in an unwitnessed fall on 12/31/22 and hospitalization where she was found to have a right fibular fracture. This affected one resident (Resident #256) of four residents reviewed for falls. The census was 106. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #256 revealed an admission date of 12/28/22 with admitting diagnoses including displaced Trimalleolar fracture of right lower leg. Further diagnoses included history of falling, esophageal varices, renal insufficiency, cognitive communication deficit, and cirrhosis of the liver. Review of Nursing Comprehensive Evaluation upon admission dated 12/28/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, review of guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), and review of an online resources regarding pain in dementia residents, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's pain was managed during a dressing change to a Stage III pressure ulcer. Actual Harm occurred on 01/09/23 when Resident #15 was not medicated for pain prior to wound care which resulted in the resident exhibiting signs (yelling out, moaning and grimacing) of severe pain. This affected one resident (#15) of one resident reviewed for pain management. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, respiratory failure, lack of coordination, dysphagia following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, attention and concentration deficit following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, memory deficit following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, facility policy review, and Elder Abuse Act regulation review, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation to law enforcement in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #85 and #101) of three resident investigations reviewed. The census was 98. Findings Include:1.Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were urinary tract infection, klebsiella pneumoniae, bacteremia, muscle wasting, muscle weakness, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, sciatica, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, vitamin D deficiency, major depressive disorder, insomnia, arthritis, anemia, polyarthritis, and retention of urine. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/20/26, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #85's self reported incident (SRI) investigation documentation found that she made an allegation of misappropriation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility investigative document review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #101) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation allegations. The census was 98. Findings Include:Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were pleural effusion, congestive heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrioventricular block, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, Type II Diabetes, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/20/26, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #101's SRI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident and power of attorney (POA) interview, contractor interview, review of POA document, and facility contract review, the facility failed to ensure the decisions of the resident representative (POA) were given the same consideration as if the resident made the decision themselves. This affected one (Resident #95) of three residents reviewed for resident representative involvement in facility appointed contracted services. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission date of 09/09/25. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction, and end stage renal disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] Resident #95 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating she had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of the face sheet for Resident #95 dated 03/12/26 revealed a POA was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and Power of Attorney (POA) interview, staff interview, contractor interview, admission documentation review, contractor documents, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records. This affected one (Resident #95) of three residents reviewed for HIPAA. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission date of 09/09/25. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction, and end stage renal disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] Resident #95 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating she had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #95's record revealed the resident was appointed a healthcare POA on 08/19/25 and financial POA on 09/21/25. Both documents appointed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct admission and quarterly care conferences in a timely manner. This affected five (Residents #8, #34, #45, #48, and #75) of five residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 111 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and need for assistance with personal care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #34's care conferences in the medical record revealed Resident #34 had his most current care conference on 03/28/25. The progress notes revealed there were no care conferences held for Resident #34 after 03/28/25. An interview with Social Services Director #243 on 01/07/25 at 5:18 P.M. confirmed Resident #34 did not have any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident representative and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a resident who was dependent on staff assistance with personal hygiene received adequate and timely assistance with nail care. This affected one (Resident #75) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 111 residents.Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including schizophrenia and mental health disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #75 required moderate assistance from staff for personal hygiene and did not have rejection of care. Review of Resident #75's functional ability care plan dated 09/01/25 revealed Resident #75 required assistance with self-care related to his impaired cognition and impaired mobility. A listed intervention dated 09/01/25 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected four residents (#10, #11, #12, #67) of 107 residents. The facility census was 107.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/14/23 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, anxiety disorder, cognitive communication deficit, depression, and type two diabetes mellitus.Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition.Observation on 08/11/25 at 2:50 P.M. of Resident #10's room revealed a build up debris under her bed including bits of plastic. 2.Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified mood disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, aphasia, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop a detailed and comprehensive care plan for Resident #19, #26, #27, #34, #79, and #108. This affected six residents (#19, #26, #27, #34, #79, and #108) of 19 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 107.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #108’s medical record revealed an admission date of 04/26/25 and a discharge date of 06/24/25 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, end stage renal disease with dependence on dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus, fracture of sacrum, pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel, pressure ulcer of left ankle, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol abuse, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #108’s five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #108’s plan of care dated 04/26/25 revealed ‘preferred name’ was at risk for complications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, open and closed medical record review, interviews, hospital summary review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide medical treatment with a change in condition, monitor, assess and ensure treatment was provided for skin conditions for one resident (#108). Additionally, the facility failed to report concerns with a transfer and monitor a bruise for Resident #109 who was on an anticoagulant (a medication that thins the blood) therapy. The facility also failed to monitor and assess a skin tear and bruise for Resident #106. Further review revealed the facility failed to ensure hospice information was available for review for Resident #79. This affected three residents ( #106,#108 and #109) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions and one resident (#79) of one resident reviewed for hospice. The facility census was 107.Findings Include:1.Review of the closed medical record for Resident #108 revealed an initial admission date of 04/26/25 with the latest readmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on open and closed record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure bowel and bladder tracking to reflect an accurate reflection of the resident's bowel and bladder function. This affected three residents (#19, #59 and #108) of three residents reviewed for decline in bowel and bladder function. Additionally, the facility failed to timely assess and treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) for Resident #38. This affected one resident (#38) of three residents reviewed for UTI's. The facility census was 107.Findings Include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an initial admission date of 04/24/25 with the diagnoses including but no limited to congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, vascular dementia, osteoporosis, arthritis, constipation, sensorineural hearing loss and adult failure to thrive. Review of the resident’s admission nursing comprehensive evaluation dated 04/18/25 revealed the resident was continent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 67 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of dishwasher sanitation logs, the facility failed to ensure the dietary manager was competent to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 104 of 107 residents who consumed food from the kitchen the facility identified three residents (#2, #84, and #92) who ate nothing by mouth. The facility census was 107.Findings include: 1.Observation on 08/06/25 from 9:40 A.M. to 10:08 A.M. with Dietary Manager #130 revealed multiple concerns in the kitchen including:a. Multiple broken baseboards including one next to the three-compartment sink, one across from the entry way, and one to the right of the oven. Dietary Manager #130 verified findings at time of the observation.b. The three-compartment sink was leaking from the bottom into a bucket on the floor. The area surrounding this bucket was a rusty brown color and had a build up of dirt. The wall behind the three-compartment sink was chipped. Dietary Manager #130…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of kitchen staffing schedule, review of dishwasher sanitation log,and review of staff personnel file revealed the facility failed to employ sufficient staff to maintain a clean kitchen. Additionally, they failed to ensure staff were competent to ensure the dishwasher was running appropriately and qualified to be a cook. This had the potential to affect 104 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#2, #84, and #92) who ate nothing by mouth. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Findings include:1.Observation on 08/06/25 from 9:40 A.M. to 10:08 A.M. with Dietary Manager #130 revealed multiple concerns in the kitchen including:a. Multiple broken baseboards including one next to the three-compartment sink, one across from the entry way, and one to the right of the oven. Dietary Manager #130 verified this.b. The three-compartment sink was leaking from the bottom into a bucket on the floor. The area surrounding this bucket was a rusty brown color and had a buildup of dirt. The wall behind the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect 104 residents who consumed food from the kitchen the facility identified three residents (#2, #84, and #92) who ate nothing by mouth.Findings include: Interview on 08/06/25 from 12:25 P.M. to 12:55 P.M. with Resident #96 and #97 revealed the food was not always hot when it got to them. Interview with Resident #102 revealed the food was often cold and lunch on that day had been cold as well.Observation on 08/06/25 at 12:30 P.M. revealed the last trays being passed on the E Hall, the cart was open and remained open as Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #106 passed the trays. She finished the trays at 12:39 P.M.Observation on 08/06/25 at 12:41 P.M. of a test tray with Dietary Manager #130 revealed the stuffed pepper was 119 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the peas were 102 degrees F, and the [NAME] was 103 degrees F. All foods were cold when sampled.Interview on 08/06/25 at 12:41 P.M. with Dietary Manager #130 verified the foods were not at an appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of dishwasher manual, review of sanitation instructions, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and sanitize dishes in an appropriate manner. This had the potential to affect 104 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#2, #84, and #92) who ate nothing by mouth. The facility census was 107.Findings include: 1.Observation on 08/06/25 from 9:40 A.M. to 10:08 A.M. with Dietary Manager #130 revealed multiple concerns in the kitchen including:a. Multiple broken baseboards including one next to the three compartment sink, one across from the entry way, and one to the right of the oven. Dietary Manager #130 verified this at time of observation.b. The three-compartment sink was leaking from the bottom into a bucket on the floor. The area surrounding this bucket was a rusty brown color and had a build up of dirt. The wall behind the three-compartment sink was chipped. Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was in working order and a system was in place to track maintenance requests. This had the potential to affect 104 residents who consumed food from the kitchen the facility identified three residents (#2, #84, and #92) who ate nothing by mouth. The facility also failed to ensure a safe and clean environment when 35 resident rooms had missing transition strips from residents to hallways. This affected 48 residents (#1, #3, #4, #6, #7, #10, #11, #12, #13, #19, #20, #26, #27, #31, #33, #36, #39, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #77, #78, #85, #88, #89, #90, #91, #93, #95, #96, #97, #98, #99, #100, #103, #104, #105, #106, and #107) of 107 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: 1.Observation on 08/06/25 from 9:40 A.M. to 10:08 A.M. with Dietary Manager #130 revealed the disposal connected to the dishwasher was being replaced. Dietary Manager #130 reported the disposal had been down for over a month. The three-compartment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible for use. This affected two residents (#32 and #79) of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 107.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of 12/17/20 with the diagnoses including but not limited to multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, vitamin D deficiency, anxiety disorder, encounter for palliative care, opioid use, pain, cerebellar ataxia, history of falling, severe protein malnutrition, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome and adult failure to thrive. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. On 08/08/25 at 10:18 A.M., observation of Resident #32 revealed the resident's call light was laying on the floor at the bottom of the bed out of the resident's reach. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #203…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician and the resident's family of a new skin impairment. This affected one resident (#79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 107. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of 12/17/20 with the diagnoses including but not limited to multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, vitamin D deficiency, anxiety disorder, encounter for palliative care, opioid use, pain, cerebellar ataxia, history of falling, severe protein malnutrition, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome and adult failure to thrive. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the weekly skin and wound evaluation dated 08/07/25 revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, review of facility investigation and self-reported incidents (SRI), and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #112 was free from verbal abuse. This affected one resident (#112) of one resident reviewed for verbal abuse. The facility also failed to prevent an injury of unknown origin for Resident #79. This affected one resident (#79) of three residents reviewed for injuries. The facility census was 107.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #112’s medical record revealed an admission date of 06/12/25 and a discharge date of 07/18/25, his diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, unspecified corneal ulcer, muscle weakness, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the facility self-reported incident dated 06/17/25 revealed the facility reported an incident of emotional or verbal abuse due to a resident and staff member arguing over the meal served for breakfast. The resident was Resident #112 and he had no adverse effects from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to the required state agency. This affected one resident (#79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 107. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of 12/17/20 with the diagnoses including but not limited to multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, vitamin D deficiency, anxiety disorder, encounter for palliative care, opioid use, pain, cerebellar ataxia, history of falling, severe protein malnutrition, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome and adult failure to thrive. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the weekly skin and wound evaluation dated 08/07/25 revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was investigated. This affected one resident (#79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 107. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of 12/17/20 with the diagnoses including but not limited to multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, vitamin D deficiency, anxiety disorder, encounter for palliative care, opioid use, pain, cerebellar ataxia, history of falling, severe protein malnutrition, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome and adult failure to thrive. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the weekly skin and wound evaluation dated 08/07/25 revealed the resident was found to have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately document a transfer and discharge and provide a transfer notice for Resident #108 and #109. This affected two residents (#108 and #109) of five discharge records reviewed. The facility census was 107.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #109 revealed an admission date of 01/15/25 and a discharge date of 04/13/25 with diagnoses including pneumonia, cognitive communication deficit, generalized anxiety disorder, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of Resident #109’s progress note dated 04/13/25 revealed the resident had a fall and hit her head. Emergency medical services were called, and the resident was sent to the hospital. Review of Resident #109’s medical record revealed no transfer or discharge summary was completed and no transfer notice was provided. Interview on 08/07/25 at 1:13 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was insufficient documentation related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed accurately for Resident #108 and Resident #109. This affected two residents (#108 and #109) of 19 medical records reviewed. The facility census was 107.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #109 revealed an admission date of 01/15/25 and a discharge date of 04/13/25 with diagnoses including pneumonia, cognitive communication deficit,2109 generalized anxiety disorder, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of Resident #109’s MDS assessments revealed the last one completed was on 04/13/25 and indicated ‘discharge return anticipated’. Review of Resident #109’s medical record revealed she did not return to the facility following her transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Interview on 08/13/25 at 1:05 P.M. with MDS Nurse #215 verified Resident #109’s MDS assessment was not correct, she had not returned to the facility. 2 . Review of the closed medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, open and closed medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely accurate comprehensive assessment of pressure ulcers/injury. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure skin interventions were implemented as physician ordered. This affected three residents (#32, #79 and #108) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 107. Findings Include:1.Review of the closed medical record for Resident #108 revealed an initial admission date of 04/26/25 with the latest readmission of 06/13/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other mechanical complication of surgically created arteriovenous fistula, acquired absence of other left toes, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, generalized muscle weakness, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and with stage five chronic kidney disease ,end stage renal disease (ESRD), diabetes mellitus, pressure induced deep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, the facility failed to have orders in place for continuous oxygen use for Resident #26. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/18/25 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure, acute respiratory failure, end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of Resident #26's minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had intact cognition. Review of Resident #26's plan of care revealed it did not address his oxygen usage. Review of Resident #26's physician orders from 06/18/25 to 08/06/25 revealed no orders for oxygen.Review of Resident #26's progress note dated 06/18/25 revealed the resident arrived to the facility with oxygen on at two liters.Review of the skilled nursing notes dated 6/20/25, 07/04/25, 07/06/25, 07/07/25, 07/08/25, 07/09/25, 07/11/25, 07/12/25, 07/13/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assess Resident #26's pain, document location of pain with administration of 'as needed' pain medications, and administering pain medications according to orders. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 107.Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/18/25 with diagnoses including chronic heart failure, acute respiratory failure, end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of Resident #26's minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had intact cognition. Review of Resident #26's progress note dated 07/20/25 revealed the resident called emergency medical services for pain in his legs.Review of Resident #26's progress note dated 07/20/25 revealed the resident returned from the hospital with a new order for pain medication. Review of Resident #26's physician order dated 07/21/25 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to educate Resident #108 upon refusal of dialysis and notify Resident #102's family of his refusal to attend dialysis. This affected two residents (#102 and #108) of three residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 107.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #108's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/26/25 and a discharge date of 06/24/25 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, end stage renal disease with dependence on dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus, fracture of sacrum, pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel, pressure ulcer of left ankle, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol abuse, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #108's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #108's plan of care dated 04/26/25 revealed resident was at risk for complications related to dialysis. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication was available for administration as physician ordered. This affected one resident (#108) of three residents reviewed for medication availability. The facility census was 107.Findings Include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #108 revealed an initial admission date of 04/26/25 with the latest readmission of 06/13/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other mechanical complication of surgically created arteriovenous (AV) fistula, acquired absence of other left toes, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, generalized muscle weakness, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and with stage five chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease, end stage renal disease (ESRD), diabetes mellitus, pressure induced deep tissue injury (DTI) to left heel, DTI to left ankle, atrial fibrillation, anemia, opioid use, depression, urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a care planned fall intervention for Resident #63. This affected one resident (#63) out of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 102 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness, dementia, history of transient ischemic attach and cerebral infarction. Resident #63 had falls in the facility on 09/10/24 and 12/18/24. On 09/10/24, the new fall intervention was to have non-skid strips placed to the floor in front of the resident's bed. The care plan dated 08/31/21, Resident #63 was identified at risk for falls related to gait and balance problems, dementia and obesity. A care planned intervention dated 09/10/24 was to have non-skid strips to the floor in front of the bed. Observations on 01/07/25 at 12:22 P.M. and 2:41 P.M. revealed that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of the facility investigation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse reported by one resident (Resident #105). This affected one resident (#105) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 105. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #105 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], a readmission date on 06/20/24, and a discharge date on 10/11/24. Medical diagnoses included end stage renal disease, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, dependence on renal dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #105's census revealed she was admitted to a semi-private room. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #105 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility abuse investigation, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #26) was treated with dignity and respect. The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #26) of three reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date on 04/04/18. Medical diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic pain syndrome, need for assistance with personal care, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without chest pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition and scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #26 was independent with completing Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a facility investigation dated 06/24/24 revealed Resident #26 was involved in a consensual relationship with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility abuse investigation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report former Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #115 to the state Nursing Board for an inappropriate relationship with one resident (Resident #26). The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #26) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date on 04/04/18. Medical diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic pain syndrome, need for assistance with personal care, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without chest pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition and scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #26 was independent with completing Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a facility investigation dated 06/24/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility abuse investigation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an inappropriate relationship between former Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 115 and one resident (Resident #26). The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #26) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date on 04/04/18. Medical diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic pain syndrome, need for assistance with personal care, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without chest pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition and scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #26 was independent with completing Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a facility investigation dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of shower documentation, review of the shower schedule, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure showers were completed as scheduled and per resident preference for two residents (Residents #69 and #79). The deficient practice affected two residents (Residents #69 and #79) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date 10/29/20. Medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), multiple sclerosis, and muscle weakness. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had intact cognition and scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #69 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing or showering. Review of the care plan revised 04/22/24 revealed Resident #69 had a functional deficit and required assistance with self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to administer all medications to Resident #100 the evening of admission. This affected one (Resident #100) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration upon admission. Facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #100 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 08/14/24 with diagnoses that included acute osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, ascites, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #100 did not receive Gabapentin (for pain) 200 milligram (mg), Nifedipine (treat high blood pressure) 90 mg, and Senna (laxative) 8.6 mg the evening of 08/10/24. Gabapentin and Nifedipine was available to be pulled from the facility emergency drug kit, and Senna was an over-the-counter medication that was available. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medications errors. This affected one (Resident #100) out of three residents reviewed for insulin administration. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 08/10/24 and discharge on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis, altered mental status, end-stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia requiring long-term use of insulin, ascites, hepatomegaly with splenomegaly, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 08/28/24 indicated that Resident #100 was cognitively intact, required assistance with activities of daily living, and had diabetes mellitus. Review of progress notes dated 08/10/24 at 5:39 P.M. revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility via emergency medical services. The director of nursing and assistant director of nursing were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, review of manufacturer instructions, review of Medscape guidance on intermittent insulin injections, and pharmacy and staff interviews, the facility failed to prime an insulin pen per manufacturer instructions prior to administration, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #75) of one resident observed for insulin administration. The facility identified 19 residents who receive insulin. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 05/16/22. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus (DM) type two. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 was cognitively impaired. Review of the physician orders for Resident #75 revealed an order dated 04/14/24 for Insulin Glargine subcutaneous solution 100 unit/milliliter (ml) inject 26 units subcutaneously one time a day for DM. Observation of medication administration on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse is disposed of properly. This had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility. The census was 101. Findings include: Observation of the facility parking lot on 05/21/24, at 6:50 A.M. revealed one large garbage dumpster and three large recycling dumpster's located in the back of the building parking lot. The garbage dumpster was separated from the three recycling dumpster's. To the right of the dumpster revealed several broken porcelain tiles in a pile with white powder around each tile. Observation of the area to the left close of the dumpster revealed an extra-large rolling plastic garbage can no lid filled with garbage bags and yellow like refuse stuck to the handle of the can. Directly below the handle was additional yellow refuse. Around the outside of the dumpster there were four scattered used rubber gloves, plastic bottles, used face masks and additional refuse laying on the cement around the dumpster. Tour of the garbage dumpster area on 05/21/24, at 7:10 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control protocols during glucose testing for Resident #35. This affected one (#35) out of three residents observed for glucometer checks and had the potential to affect 10 (#15, #24, #33, #35, #77, #38, #71, #69, #35 and #7) residents that receive blood glucose monitoring (BGM) using a shared glucometer. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during catheter care for Resident #85. This affected one (#85) of one resident observed for catheter care. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of medical records for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 02/23/21. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus type two (DMII), chronic kidney disease, polyosteoarthritis, cellulitis, and generalized weakness. Review of orders dated 03/20/23 for Resident #35 revealed an order for blood glucose (sugar) monitoring (BGM) twice a day. Orders dated 02/15/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of care plan, and staff interviews, the facility failed to properly develop comprehensive care plans. This affected two residents (#33 and #6) of two residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 04/16/24. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus type two, bipolar disorder, neuropathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, gout, chronic pain, and edema. Review of the care plan on 05/28/24 8:59 A.M. for Resident #33 dated 04/16/24 revealed diabetes mellitus type two and bipolar disorder diagnoses not included in care planning. Interview on 05/28/24 at 10:41 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the care plan did not address Resident #33's diabetes or bipolar disorder diagnoses. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an initial admission date on 12/12/22 and a readmission date to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a podiatrist when needed. This affected three residents (#41, #75 and #89) of three residents reviewed for foot care. The census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/08/23 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, weakness, soft tissue disorder, and diabetes type II. Review of Resident #41's plan of care dated 4/23/24 revealed interventions to refer to podiatrist/foot care. Observation and interview on 05/20/24 at 02:09 P.M. with Resident #41 revealed her toenails on both feet were long, thick, and curled around each toe. Resident #41 revealed she could not wear socks because they are too irritating to her toes. Interview and observation on 05/22/24 at 4:15 P.M. of Resident #41's feet with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #650 confirmed Resident #41 is a diabetic and should have been referred to a podiatrist to care for her toes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented a resident's indwelling urinary catheter care. This affected one (#85) out of one residents reviewed for indwelling catheter care. Facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an initial admission date on 06/08/23 and a readmission date on 04/22/24. Diagnoses include infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter (04/22/24), urinary tract infection (04/22/24), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (06/08/23), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (06/08/23), and retention of urine (06/08/23). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #85 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #85 required total dependence on staff to complete toileting. Resident #85 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a residents pain medication was available and administered as physician ordered. This affected one (#85) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an initial admission date on 06/08/23 and a readmission date on 04/22/24. Medical diagnoses included infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter (04/22/24), urinary tract infection (04/22/24), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (06/08/23), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (06/08/23), and retention of urine (06/08/23). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had impaired cognition and scored an eight out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #37 required setup or clean-up assistance from staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical chart review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Four medication errors out 33 medication administration observations resulted in an error rate of 12%. This affected two residents (#35,and #159) of four residents (#35, #71, #159, and #73) observed for medication administration. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of medical records for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 02/23/21. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus type two (DMII), chronic kidney disease, polyosteoarthritis, cellulitis, and generalized weakness. Review of orders dated 03/20/23 for Resident #35 revealed an order for blood glucose (sugar) monitoring (BGM) twice a day. Orders dated 02/15/23 for Resident #35 revealed order for Lantus Solution 100 unit/milliliter (ml) (Insulin Glargine) 65 units twice a day for DMII. Observation on 5/22/24 at 7:35 A.M. of Nurse #667 revealed Nurse #667 entered the room of Resident # 35 without completing hand hygiene. Further observation revealed Nurse #667…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical records review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prime an insulin pen prior to administration, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #35) of four residents observed for medication administration. Facility census was 101 Findings include: Review of medical records for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 02/23/21. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two (DMII), chronic kidney disease, polyosteoarthritis, cellulitis, and generalized weakness. Review of physician orders dated 03/20/23 for Resident #35 revealed an order for blood glucose (blood sugar) monitoring twice a day. Orders dated 02/15/23 for Lantus Solution 100 unit/milliliter (ml) (Insulin Glargine) 65 units twice a day for DMII. Observation on 05/22/24 at 7:35 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #667 administered 65 units of Lantura Soluation from the insulin pen to Resident #35 without priming the insulin pen prior to administration. Interview on 05/22/24 at 7:45 A.M. with RN #667 confirmed the insulin pen was not primed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control procedures during medication administration for Resident #10. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Observation on 02/02/24 at 8:35 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #154 was lifting the medication cards out of the medication cart and putting the medications into her bare hand before placing the medication in the medication cup. LPN #154 revealed she was getting medications ready to administer to Resident #10. LPN #154 verified she should probably be wearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately while the facility was in a COVID-19 outbreak and failed to ensure appropriate PPE was available outside of Resident #64's room who was on isolation for COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 97 residents who did not have an active diagnosis of COVID (Resident #64 had an active diagnosis of COVID-19). The facility census was 98. Findings included: Observation on 10/04/23 at 8:10 A.M. of signage on the main entrance door which read COVID POSITIVE Effective 09/16/23, Social distances and masking are recommended at all times. Some areas require PPE for visitations. Please see the nurse for guidance. 1. Observation on 10/04/23 at 8:11 A.M. of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #103 in the dining room not wearing her N-95 mask properly. It was covering her neck and chin, and her nose and mouth were exposed. Interview on 10/04/23 at 8:25 A.M. with CNA #103 verified she was not wearing her N-95 mask properly while in the dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, resident record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to update care plans to meet resident needs. This affected three residents (#29, #79, and #83) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 98. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/23/23 with diagnoses including complex lesion at T7-T10 levels of thoracic spinal cord, fusion of spine, thoracic region, abnormal posture, generalized muscle weakness, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, Paraplegia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/29/23, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, and transferring and ambulation did not occur. The assessment indicated the resident did not have any pressure ulcers but was risk for developing a pressure ulcer/injury. Further review revealed skin and ulcer/injury treatment included a pressure reducing device…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, resident record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a Stage 3 (involving full-thickness skin loss potentially extending into the subcutaneous tissue layer) coccyx pressure ulcer was turned regularly and the treatment order was followed. This affected one resident (#29) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/23/23 with diagnoses including complex lesion at T7-T10 levels of thoracic spinal cord, fusion of spine, thoracic region, abnormal posture, generalized muscle weakness, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, paraplegia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/29/23, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, and transferring and ambulation did not occur. The assessment indicated the resident did not have any pressure ulcers but was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and resident record review the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate. This affected two residents (#29 and #83) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 98. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/23/23 with diagnoses including complex lesion at T7-T10 levels of thoracic spinal cord, fusion of spine, thoracic region, abnormal posture, generalized muscle weakness, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, paraplegia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/29/23, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, and transferring and ambulation did not occur. The assessment indicated the resident did not have any pressure ulcers but was risk for developing a pressure ulcer/injury. Further review revealed skin and ulcer/injury treatment included a pressure reducing device for his bed. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was enough staff to provide showers and turning and repositioning for residents. This affected three (#15, #61, #207) of three residents reviewed for showers and one (#47) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, with the potential to affect all 106 residents. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/19/16. Medical diagnoses included diabetes, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of care plan dated 01/14/20 for Resident #5 revealed she required activities of daily assistance for bathing with one-person staff assistance. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was not assessed for cognition. Her functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. She was total dependence for bathing with one-person physical assistance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dining room stayed open even when there was an outbreak of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 98 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility identified there were eight residents who could not eat anything by mouth. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/09/18. Medical diagnoses included diabetes, peripheral vascular (PVD)disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was not assessed for cognition. Review of infection control logs for COVID-19 revealed there were five residents with COVID-19 on 12/21/22 and on 01/06/23 there was one who came from the hospital with COVID-19. Observation of dining room on 01/08/23 from 8:30 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. at breakfast and at 12:30 to 1:00 P.M. for lunch revealed there wasn't any residents in the dining room for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, resident council minutes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Council Concerns were addressed in a timely manner. This affected seven (#5, #33, #41, #42, #53, #69, and #207) of seven residents reviewed for resident council. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident council minutes dated 08/16/22 revealed the residents complained about name badges not being worn or turned around so you couldn't see the name of the employee. On 09/13/22 the residents complained about when will the dining room would reopen, showers not being completed or offered and said the name badges were still an issue. On 10/11/22 revealed the showers needed to be worked on, and name badges were still an issue. On 11/15/22 the name badges and showers were still an issue. On 12/13/22 showers and name badges were still an issue. Observation of dining room on 01/08/23 from 8:30 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. at breakfast and at 12:30 to 1:00 P.M. for lunch revealed there wasn't any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family and staff interviews, medical record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were dressed in personal clothes and received showers as scheduled. This affected four (#5, #41, #63, and #207) residents out of the five residents reviewed for activities of daily Living (ADL). This had the potential to affect all the residents. The facility census was 106. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 03/05/2020 with medical diagnoses of right sided hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus (DM), dysphagia, aphasia, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and benign prostate hypertrophy. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #63 was rarely/never understood and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility and dressing. The MDS stated Resident #63 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a individualized care plan was initiated for residents who used psychotropic medications. This affected two residents (#15 and #75) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 106. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #75 revealed she was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, and Non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of admission minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 was severely cognitively impaired. Her functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and eating. She was a total dependence for toilet use. Review of physician orders dated 11/26/22 revealed Escitalopram Oxalate 5 milligram (mg) to give one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of care plans for Resident #75 revealed there was not a care plan for depression and no interventions in the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and family interviews, medical record review and policy review, the facility failed to apply Resident #63's splints to maintain range of motion as ordered. This affected one resident (#63) out of two residents reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 03/05/2020 with medical diagnoses of right sided hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus (DM), dysphagia, aphasia, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and benign prostate hypertrophy. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care plan dated 03/26/21 that stated Resident #63 had a contracture to right hand and decreased ROM to bilateral upper and lower extremities. The care plan revealed interventions that included Resident #63 was dependent upon staff for dressing, bathing, and transfers and staff to encourage/assist with left and right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's enteral feed and flush was was dated and failed to position Resident #15 properly in bed to prevent aspiration. This affected one resident (Resident #15) out of eight residents on enteral feedings. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of heart failure, respiratory failure, lack of coordination, dysphagia following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, attention and concentration deficit following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, memory deficit following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, epilepsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, depression, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage III, attention to gastrostomy. Review of the physician orders dated 12/06/22 revealed orders for Osmolite 1.2 at 80 milliliters (ml) per hour times 20 hours per percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Artificial Manual Breathing Unit (AMBU) bag was in the room for a resident who had a tracheostomy. This affected one (#70) of one resident resident reviewed for tracheostomy. The census was 106. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #70 revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the oropharynx. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 was cognitively intact. Observation on 01/08/23 at 9:58 A.M. revealed there was not an AMBU bag in his room. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #241 on 01/08/23 at 12:06 P.M. revealed there was not an AMBU bag in Resident #70's room and with the resident having a tracheostomy he should have one in case of an emergency.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident for risk of entrapment. This affected one (#63) resident of one resident reviewed for side rails. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 03/05/2020 with medical diagnoses of right sided hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus (DM), dysphagia, aphasia, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and benign prostate hypertrophy. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #63 was rarely/never understood and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility and dressing. The MDS stated Resident #63 was dependent upon staff for transfers, bathing, toileting, and eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed no documentation to support a physician order for the ½ side rails to bilateral side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for medications left at the bedside. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/05/22. Medical diagnoses included spinal stenosis and atrial fibrillation. Review of evaluations since 10/06/22 revealed there was not one for self administration for medications. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was cognitively intact. Observation on 01/19/22 at 11:09 A.M. revealed Resident #27 had a medication cup full of medications and a medication cup full of a red liquid substance. Resident #27 stated the staff want him to take his medications in a hurry and he doesn't want to do that, so he told the nurses to leave the medications and he will take them at his leisure. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #368 on 01/10/22 at 9:18 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide meals at an appetizing temperature. This affected two (#42 and #53) residents out of the three residents sampled for meals. This had the potential to affect 98 residents who received meal trays, as the facility identified eight residents (#3, #7, #15, #63, #67, #70, #76, #258) received nothing by mouth. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date 09/05/19 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, epilepsy, hyperlipidemia, depression, unspecified dementia, constipation, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #42 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and dressing. The MDS stated Resident #42 required supervision with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to deliver meal trays timely. This affected two (#42 and #53) residents out of the three residents sampled for meals. This had the potential to affect 98 residents who received meal trays, as the facility identified eight residents (#3, #7, #15, #63, #67, #70, #76, #258) received nothing by mouth. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date 09/05/19 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, epilepsy, hyperlipidemia, depression, unspecified dementia, constipation, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #42 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and dressing. The MDS stated Resident #42 required supervision with set-up for eating and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control procedures during the treatment of Resident #22's wound. This affected one resident (Resident #22) out of four reviewed for wound care. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #22 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, lupus, muscle weakness, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, polyneuropathy, insomnia, GERD, COVID-19, depression, anxiety, osteoarthritis, atrial fibrillation, cardiac pacemaker, pressure ulcer stage 4, abnormal posture, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, seizures, anemia, obesity, fibromyalgia, hypotension, cardiomyopathy, anticoagulant use, gastrostomy, and left shoulder pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was alert to name, place, and time and able to make her needs known. Review of current physician orders revealed this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and dated when opened to prevent use after expiration. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 12:02 P.M. of the unit A medication storage room refrigerator revealed one open tuberculin multi dose vial without an open date. On [DATE] at 12:05 P.M. interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the tuberculin did not have an open date and therefore staff would not know when to discard it once it was expired. Review of the tuberculosis (TB) assessment facility plan revealed all new admissions were receiving either a one step of two step Mantoux to test for exposure of tuberculosis. Review of the Tuberculin package insert revealed a pierced vial should be discarded after 30 days from opening. 2. On [DATE] at 12:09 P.M. observation of the top drawer of the medication cart revealed a plastic medication cup full of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to store, label, and date food properly to prevent contamination and food borne illness. This had potential to affect 90 of 90 residents residing in the facility who received meal trays from the kitchen, with the exception of Resident #53, #287, and #337 who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 93. Findings include: On 01/27/20 at 9:00 A.M. an initial tour of the kitchen revealed the following: An open bag of lettuce was in the refrigerator that did not have a date on it. Items stored in the freezer, including a bag of chicken tenders, a bag of hamburger patties, a bag of waffles, a bag of bacon strips and a bag of pre-made biscuit dough were opened and not dated. Interviews with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 01/27/20 at 9:15 A.M. and 9:20 A.M. verified the bag of lettuce in the refrigerator had been opened and did not have a date on it. The DM also verified each of the above listed items in the freezer were being stored opened and undated. Review of the facility policy titled, Date Marking and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #75 was provided dignity related to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#75) of two residents reviewed for catheters. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 07/31/19 with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, fibromyalgia and spinal stenosis. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 had moderate cognitive deficits and use of an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter. Review of physician's orders dated January 2020 revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter for acute kidney injury and renal calculi. Observation on 01/27/20 at 11:04 A.M. of Resident #75 revealed she was resting in bed with her door open. The resident's Foley catheter bag was exposed to the hallway and there was no dignity bag or cover present. Interview on 01/27/20 at 11:46…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to honor Resident #13's right to change rooms. This affected one resident (#13) of one resident reviewed who requested a room change. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were epilepsy, obstructive and reflux uropathy, muscle weakness, altered mental status, chronic kidney disease, bacteruria, low back pain, hypertension, dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, type II diabetes, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/28/19 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Interview with Resident #13 on 01/28/20 at 8:18 A.M. revealed he wanted to change rooms. He stated he told the nurse about this a while ago, but they were not doing anything about it. He stated he wanted to change rooms because his roommate was loud, his hallway/unit was loud,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #74 received clean bed linens and was provided with pillow cases. This affected one resident (#74) of 26 residents reviewed for homelike environment and dignity. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 12/18/19 with diagnoses including hemiplegia, migraines and epileptic seizures. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 was cognitively intact. Observation on 01/27/20 at 11:27 A.M. revealed Resident #74's bed had dried blood observed on the sheets and two areas of black marker stains on the sheets. Her pillow had no pillow case and there was no pillow case located on the bed or in the room. Interview on 01/27/20 at 11:27 A.M. with Resident #74 revealed the dried blood on her sheet was from when she scratched her arm four days ago. She stated she had no idea how the black marker stains were on the sheets and stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to include the use of oxygen for Resident #137 in a baseline care plan. This affected one resident (#137) of two residents reviewed for oxygen use. Findings include: Review of Resident #137's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/20 with the admitting diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and oxygen dependence. Review of the resident's nursing comprehensive evaluation dated 01/17/20 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital. The resident was alert and oriented to person, place and time. Her speech was clear. The evaluation indicated the resident was dependent on oxygen at five liters per nasal cannula continuously. Review of the resident's admission orders revealed an order dated 01/18/20 for oxygen at five liters via nasal cannula continuously. Review of the resident's baseline plan of care revealed no plan of care addressing the resident's COPD, malignant neoplasm of the bronchus or lung or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure quarterly care conferences were conducted for Resident #63 and failed to ensure Resident #73's care plan was revised related to hemodialysis. This affected one resident (#63) of one resident reviewed for care conferences and one resident (#73) of three residents specifically reviewed for care plan revisions. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypothyroidism, dysphagia, muscle weakness, unspecified convulsions, hypertension, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, nontoxic multinodular goiter, personal history of traumatic brain injury, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia and anemia. Review of Resident #63's medical records revealed a care conference was held on 05/20/19, when the resident was admitted back to the facility from the hospital. Then, she did not have another one until 01/10/20. Even on the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized activity program to meet the total care needs of Resident #8. This affected one resident (#8) of one resident reviewed for activities. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including degenerative disease of nervous system, congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, polymer, recurrent depressive disorder, glaucoma, bursitis of unspecified shoulder, hyperlipidemia, nontoxic goiter, anemia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/04/20 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, which indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #8's medical records revealed she was on contact isolation precautions for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) in her urine. Review of the activity assessment, dated 12/20/19 revealed there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure physician ordered heel (protectors) boots were provided as ordered for Resident #52. This affected one resident (#52) of six residents assessed for skin alterations. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 05/28/19 with diagnoses including chronic pain, depression, restlessness, palliative care, hemiplegia and cerebrovascular disease. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had some moderate cognitive deficits, received hospice services and had no skin breakdown. Review of physician's orders dated January 2020 revealed Resident #52 was to wear foot protectors to both feet every shift for protection. Review of skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had no skin breakdown. Review of the current plan of care revealed Resident #52 was at risk for impaired skin integrity and pressure injury related to weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #63 was offered vision appointments. This affected one resident (#63) of two residents reviewed for sensory appointments. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypothyroidism, dysphagia, muscle weakness, unspecified convulsions, hypertension, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, nontoxic multinodular goiter, personal history of traumatic brain injury, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/12/20 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #63's medical records revealed she did not have a document which indicated her wishes for vision care. There was a consent for all other ancillary services, but the form used for Resident #63 did not have vision as an option. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to provide an appropriate justification and assessment for the ongoing use of a urinary (Foley) catheter for Resident #75. This affected one resident (#75) of two residents reviewed for catheters. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 07/31/19 with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, fibromyalgia, and spinal stenosis. Record review revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter. Review of a history and physical dated 07/24/19 revealed kidney stone resolved. The resident's active diagnoses did not include any justification for the use of a catheter. Review of Resident #75's care plan revealed she was at risk for urinary tract infections and catheter related trauma due to use of Foley catheter. Review of a physician progress note, dated 09/30/19 revealed Resident #75 continued to have a Foley catheter and had some issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #137's oxygen tubing and humidified water bottle was dated. This affected one resident (#137) of two resident reviewed for oxygen use. Findings include: Review of Resident #137's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/20 with the admitting diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and oxygen dependence. Review of the resident's nursing comprehensive evaluation dated 01/17/20 revealed the resident was admitted from an acute care hospital. The resident was alert and oriented to person, place and time. Her speech was clear. The evaluation indicated the resident was dependent on oxygen at five liters per nasal cannula continuously. Review of the resident's admission orders revealed an order dated 01/18/20 for oxygen at five liters via nasal cannula continuously. On 01/27/20 at 3:28 P.M. observation of Resident #137's oxygen tubing and humidified water bottle revealed the supplies were not dated. On 01/27/20 at 3:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a system of records and disposition to ensure all controlled drugs were accurately accounted for and reconciled. This affected one resident (#5) randomly reviewed for narcotic medication reconciliation. The facility census was 93. Findings include: On 01/20/20 at 12:07 P.M. review of the narcotic reconciliation book with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12 revealed the narcotic count sheet for Resident #5's Ultram, a narcotic pain medication, was 24. However, review of the reconciliation signature page revealed 25 pills should be in the medication card. On 01/20/20 at 12:08 P.M. interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), who was at the medication cart revealed the correct count should be 24. LPN #12 revealed she had crushed one tablet of the medication but did not administer it and failed to verify wasting the medication with another nurse before dispensing another pill. The LPN also verfiied she failed to put her signature on the sheet for dispensing another narcotic pain pill.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-01-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy. This had the potential to affect all 106 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #231's personnel file revealed a hire date of 11/03/22. Further review of STNA #231's personnel file revealed STNA #231 did not have any reference checks completed upon hire. Review of STNA #206's personnel file revealed a hire date of 10/20/22. Further review of STNA #206's personnel file revealed STNA #206 did not have any reference checks completed upon hire. Review of STNA #255's personnel file revealed a hire date of 11/17/22. Further review of STNA #255's personnel file revealed STNA #255 did not have any reference checks completed upon hire. Review of STNA #323's personnel file revealed a hire date of 12/01/22. Further view of STNA #323's personnel file revealed STNA #323 did not have any reference checks completed upon hire. Review of Certified Occupational Therapist Assistant (COTA) # 276's personnel file revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-01-30 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman regarding resident discharges in a timely manner. This affected two residents (#86 and #87) and had the potential to affect all 93 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were spinal stenosis, disease of spinal cord, muscle weakness, pneumonia, dysphagia, chronic pain syndrome, hypo-osmolality, chronic kidney disease (stage III), spinal instabilities, fibromyalgia, anemia, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive sleep disease, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism, pain, insomnia, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/23/19 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #86's medical records revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$394,237 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $229,620 — penalty dated 2026-01-15
  • $62,221 — penalty dated 2024-09-30
  • $102,396 — penalty dated 2024-06-03
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-13 for 47 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-29 for 28 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAUREL OHIO OPERATIONS GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2018
LAUREL HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2018
LAUREL ACQUISITION HOLDING CORPORATIONOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2018
KHAN, ANISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/30/2018
LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
ADKINS, FRANKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2014
SLAYBAUGH, RANDALLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
STOBB, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$563K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 21%Medicare 3%Other / private 76%

This home reported $563K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$321per resident / day
operating cost
$9,768per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366457. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next