Regency at Chene
2295 E Vernor Highway, Detroit, MI 48207 · For profit - Individual · 160 certified beds · (313) 923-5816 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-19)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.4% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.9% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 44.6% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.1% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 4.1% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.8% | 24.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.4% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.84 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.8%CMS range 37.4–58.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.1–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 83.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.7–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 144.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice Statement 1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an emergency tracheostomy (an incision into the windpipe made to relieve an obstruction to breathing) was accessible, resulting in the likelihood of serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death for one resident (R138) who required mechanical ventilation. In an observation on 4/16/24 at 9:55 a.m., R138 laid in bed and had a tracheostomy (trach). There was not an emergency trach visible in R138's room. In an observation and interview on 4/16/24 at 10:32 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L was asked about R138's emergency backup trach and could not locate one in R138's room. LPN L reported there was not an emergency backup trach in R138's room. In an observation and interview on 04/16/24 at 10:34 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about an emergency backup trach for R138. The DON then searched R138's room and could not locate an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00129879, MI00130059, and MI00131366. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess and implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for one (R196) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in the development of one unstageable pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because it is obscured by slough or eschar) and one Stage 3 pressure ulcer (Full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole [rolled wound edges] are often present) that went untreated during a12-day, Covid Unit stay. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint that R196 developed pressure ulcers that went untreated while at the facility from 8/3/22 - 8/15/22 when he was quarantined for Covid-19. According to R196's Electronic Health Record (EHR), the resident directly admitted into the facility's Covid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00130059. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly transfer one resident (R61) of six residents reviewed for falls resulting in the fracture of R61's right femur (thigh bone), right tibia (shin bone of calf), and right fibula (lateral bone of the calf, top of outer ankle) during a transfer from toilet to wheelchair. Findings include: On 2/7/23 at 2:40 PM R61 was observed seated in her wheelchair watching TV in the room. R61 said she had a recent fall in the bathroom because the CNA (certified nursing assistant) did not transfer her the right way. R61 stated, She (CNA K) took me to the bathroom and then pulled my wheelchair out away from me. When she came back to take me off the toilet, she tried to do it by herself by grabbing onto my pants and yanking me up and over to the wheelchair while I held onto the bar. I told her 'No'. Bring the wheelchair closer so I can pivot from the toilet onto the wheelchair while I hold on to the bar, and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): 3022409 and 3022328. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to the Abuse Coordinator for one (R801) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:A review of complaints submitted to the State Agency revealed allegation that R801 had a black eye and reported someone hit her. On 6/10/26, an onsite investigation was conducted. On 6/10/26 at 11:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator, who was identified as the Abuse Coordinator for the facility. The Administrator reported a detective came to the facility after receiving a concern that R801 had a black eye and said she was hit. At that time, the Administrator reported the allegation was reported to the State Agency, an investigation was conducted, and they concluded there was no evidence that abuse occurred. At that time, the Administrator provided the facility's investigation. A review of R801's clinical record revealed R801 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2735896.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement adequate supervision for one cognitively intact resident (R903) from three residents reviewed for safety resulting in R903 exiting the building with family unbeknownst to the facility and unknown whereabouts. Findings include: The State Agency received an anonymous complaint that a resident had eloped from the facility.On 2/18/26 at 11:15 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if a resident had eloped from the facility. The DON stated, It was not an elopement. That person was cognitively intact and thought they were going on a Leave of Absence (LOA) with friends and family. The resident was safe with family in their home. The resident said they did not know they were supposed to get permission to leave the building or they would have done that. The staff did not follow the facility's LOA process. The nurse thought the resident was on a LOA but there was no order for it. There was no information on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-13 · tag F0562 — widespreadProvide immediate access to any resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide timely required information upon facility entry and during the annual recertification survey affecting all residents who reside in the facility causing a delay in the survey process. On 5/5/2025 at 8:30 AM upon facility entry the survey team leader requested a facility census, a resident list, and facility matrix from Registered Nurse (RN) H. RN H did not provide the requested information. On 5/5/2025 at approximately 9:15 AM the facility census, resident list, WIFI access, and facility matrix were requested from the Director of Nursing (DON). On 5/5/2025 at approximately 9:45 AM the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided the facility census, resident list, facility matrix, electronic medical record (EMR) access and WIFI access. The facility provided WIFI access did not work throughout the survey. On 5/5/2025 at 9:56 AM the NHA was emailed the entrance conference worksheet which stipulates the timeframe for documents and information to be provided to the survey team. On 5/5/2025 at 10:06 AM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist in the removal of facial hair and ensure showers were provided for one female resident (R54) and provide nail care for three residents (R10, R17, R100) of 29 residents reviewed, resulting in unmet hygiene needs and the potential for feelings of diminished dignity. Findings included On 5/6/25 at 12:24 PM R54 was observed with excessive hair on the chin and both sides of the lower face. The resident had dark matter protruding from the nail bed of the left index finger. On 5/7/25 at approximately 2:00 PM the facial hair and dark matter under the left index finger were still present. R54 asked how long the facial hair had been present? R54 stated during shower days she was able to remove the facial hair, however, R54 stated she had not received a shower recently because of the pain from arthritis and that alone made her sad and down. R54 stated I am supposed to get a shower on Wednesday and Saturday each week on the day shift, it's been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure, label and dispose of expired medication by professional standards for two of four medication carts reviewed for secured, expired and unlabeled medications, resulting in the potential for unsafe medication administration. Findings include: On [DATE] at 12:55pm, an observation of Hall 500/800 Medication Cart was conducted with Registered Nurse BB (RN BB). The cart contained the following: -Humulin R, (insulin) U-100 - One vial expired 3/2025. - Lantus (insulin) U-100 one vial-Opened and undated. -Vitamin E Pills - one opened bottle expired 1/2025 - Fish Oil Pills expired 3/2025 At this time RN BB was queried regarding the expired, and undated medication. RN BB was unable to provide an explanation. On [DATE] at 1:10pm The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and queried about the storage of expired and undated medication. The DON stated, Staff should follow policy for medication cart storage. A review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hygienic practices were performed while serving resident's meals, resulting in the potential for food contamination. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 12:53 P.M. on the second floor in the dining area approximately 30 residents were observed seated in the dining room eating their lunch meals. Nursing staff were observed wrapping silverware in napkins and placing the settings on the tables for the residents. Staff entered the dining room and washed their hands but during the wrapping of the silverware touched and manipulated the eating portion of the resident's eating utensils without wearing gloves. During the meal Observation LPNM served/and assisted resident's (R61, R89 and R126) with requests for various food items. LPNM was observed with long, flowing hair that extended down her back stopping at or just below her buttocks. On 5/12/25 at 12:00 P.M. during an observation in the first-floor dining room. Nurse L (newly hired) was observed with loose, braided hair that extended down below her buttock. Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY DPS 2) Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the provision of care per professional standards of practice were implemented for infection control practice of hand hygiene during wound care, for two Residents (R121 and R143) of three Residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for spread of infection, worsening wounds, and the potential decline in overall health status. Resident # R121 On 05/06/25 at 9:22 AM, R121 was observed in bed, fully dressed, and watching TV. R121 was observed to have a left above the knee amputation (Above-the-knee amputation (AKA) involves removing the leg from the body by cutting through both the thigh tissue and femoral bone). R121 said they had a recent surgery about a month ago due to an infection. R121 indicated that staff changed their wound dressings daily. A review of R121's electronic medical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation, Heart failure, Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure functional equipment in a safe and sanitary manner, resulting in broken equipment and an unsanitary environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 143 of 146 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 12:11pm during a meal observation residents: R70, R71, R22, and R26 were observed in wheelchairs with torn and ragged arm rests. On 5/7/25 at approximately 2:00PM resident 67 was also observed with a wheelchair the arm rests were torn, ragged and uneven. On 5/7/25 at 11:40 AM during an observation of the walk-in freezer approximately 5-6 missing floor tiles created an indentation at the threshold of the door. There was no excursion around the bottom section of the freezer door causing a visible gap from the inside and safety concerns when entering and exiting the freezer door because of ice accumulation. During an observation of delivery of goods to the facility on 5/7/25 at approximately 11:50 A.M. the delivery staff had to ask DMN for facility's assistance to place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00152511. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat the resident with dignity and respect for one resident (R81) of four residents reviewed for dignity and respect, resulting in staff taking a picture of R81's buttocks, leaving the resident feeling embarrassed, ashamed, nervous, and scared. Findings include: A review of an allegation received on 4/24/2025 through the State Agency revealed the following: Complainant (R81)states that when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA E) was cleaning (R81) up, (R81) .didn't feel like (their) bottom was clean .Complainant (R81)states that after (they) told (CNA E) that (they) didn't feel clean, CNA E took out (their) phone and took a picture of (R81's) naked bottom to show resident (R81)that (their) bottom was cleaned. Complainant (R81) states (they) talked to Registered Nurse (RN G) about the incident who told (R81) to talk to the unit Manager . On 05/06/2025 at 2:26 PM, R81 was observed sitting in their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record the facility failed to develop and implement care plan interventions to monitor, prevent and accident for one resident (R54) of 29 residents reviewed, resulting in a potential for a unsafe environment. Findings include: On 5/7/25 at approximately 2:30 P.M. during an observation R54's call light was on the floor, out of reach and the resident was unaware of the location of the call light. R54's bed was positioned at the highest height as the resident asked for an aide and/or nurse. R54 repeated the request stating, I feel sick. Nurse Aide HH responded, summoning assistance from nurse DD voicing symptoms and concerns of the resident. On 5/7/25 at 3:27 P.M. during an observation, after care had been provided to R54, nurse aide HH was interviewed about the location of the resident's call light. The aide acknowledged the resident's call light was out of reach and someone had just left out of R54's room after caring for the resident. Nurse DD who went back into R 54' s' room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R408) of one resident reviewed for dialysis services had timely and complete physician orders for dialysis, restrictions associated with an arteriovenous (AV) fistula, and clearly defined fluid restriction parameters. This failure created the potential for missed treatment, compromised vascular access and inadequate fluid management. Findings Include: On 5/7/2025 at approximately 11:00 AM, observed R408 had three cups of liquid at her bedside. There was also one liter bottle of juice on the bedside table directly behind R408. On 5/7/2025 at 11:30 AM, a review of R408's clinical medical record was conducted. The electronic medial record (EMR) lacked a physician order for dialysis. No orders were noted to restrict staff from obtaining blood pressures on R408's left arm, which contained an AV fistula used for dialysis. The EMR review indicated unclear directives regarding fluid restrictions for R408, lacking specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure wheelchair footrests were in place during a wheelchair transfer and to assist with seated posture for one resident (R19) of two residents reviewed for positioning resulting in the potential for injury. Findings include: On 5/06/25 at 11:46 AM, R19 was observed sitting in the second-floor dining room participating in an activity. R19 appeared seated in a slouched position in the wheelchair without footrests with her feet dangling in the air. Activities Assistant (AA) R was observed leading the activity. On 5/06/25 at 11:53 AM, AA R was observed pushing R19 down the hallway in a wheelchair. The wheelchair did not have footrests. R19 was observed seated in a slouched position leaning back with her feet dangling in the air. On 5/06/25 at 12:30 PM, R19 was interviewed regarding the lack of footrests on her wheelchair. R19 stated, The girls don't put on the footrests to my chair. They take them off and don't put them back on. On 5/06/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care per health care provider order and standards of clinical practice for two Residents (R121 and R143) of four Residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in incorrect wound care, and the potential for wound worsening, infection, and overall deterioration in health status. Findings include: Resident # R121 On 05/06/25 at 9:22 AM, R121 was observed in bed, fully dressed, and watching TV. R121 was observed to have a left above the knee amputation (Above-the-knee amputation (AKA) involves removing the leg from the body by cutting through both the thigh tissue and femoral bone). R121 said they had had recent surgery about a month ago due to an infection. R121 indicated that staff changed their wound dressings daily. A review of R121's electronic medical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation, Heart failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate foot care for one resident (R100) out of eleven residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Findings include: On 5/06/25 at 10:51 AM, R100 was interviewed about care in the facility and stated, They don't do enough, my nails are long. R100s feet were observed with thick long toenails and dry flaky skin. On 5/08/25 at 10:20 AM, R100's feet were observed with Registered Nurse (RN) K. RN K described R100's feet as having long thick toenails and flaky skin on feet and that R100 should see the podiatrist. RN K asked R100 if he would like podiatry services and R100 agreed. Record review of R100's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Epilepsy, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (weakness) following Cerebral Infarction (stroke) affecting Right Dominant Side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R100 revealed a Brief interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to apply splints and provide Range of Motion (ROM) exercises for one resident (R100) out of four residents reviewed for limited ROM. Findings include: On 5/06/25 at 10:52 AM, R100 was observed in bed with his right elbow and right hand bent not wearing a brace or splint. On 5/07/25 at 10:13 AM, R100's splints were found in his dresser top drawer. When asked about the braces R100 stated, They don't put the splints on me they have too much to do. I would allow it, but they aren't doing it. On 5/08/25 at 10:27 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) X was interviewed and said they were not applying R100's splints or performing a ROM program with him. On 5/08/25 at 10:28 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) K was interviewed and said the facility did not have a restorative nurse or aides and the CNAs were responsible for applying splints and performing exercises. RN K said she was new to the position. On 5/08/25 at 10:33 AM, Restorative Nurse Y was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R54) of 29 residents was free from accident hazards as a results of the resident's call light not being within reach and potentially hazardous products left at the resident's bedside, resulting in a potential for an accident to occur. Findings include. On 5/6/25 at 12:28 P.M., (R54) was observed in bed with the call light entangled in the linen. On the bedside table was a container of hydrogen peroxide and a container of Comet household cleaner. On 5/7/25 at approximately 2:30 P.M. during an observation R54's call light was on the floor, out of reach and the resident was unaware of the location of the call light. R54's bed was positioned at the highest height as the resident asked for an aide and/or nurse. R54 repeated the request stating, I feel sick. Nurse Aide HH responded, summoning assistance from nurse DD voicing symptoms and concerns of the resident. At 3:27 P.M. after providing care to R54 nurse aide HH was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner for one resident (R28) of three residents reviewed with oxygen, resulting in the potential for compromised air exchange. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 11:30 A.M. during an observation R28 was observed with oxygen infusing at 3.5 Liters per minute via Nasal Cannula. Attached to the oxygen tubing which was dated 5/5/25 was an oxygen concentrator (a medical devices that provides extra oxygen. An oxygen concentrator uses the air in the atmosphere, filters it and gives you air that is 90%-95% oxygen). On 5/7/25 at approximately 12:00 P.M. record review revealed R28 was signed into hospice on 3/7/25 and the comprehensive plan of care, and the hospice consent were faxed to the facility on 5/6/25. Review of the provided contract and delegated responsibilities of each entity did not identify who was responsible for the maintenance of the oxygen received by R28. On 5/7/25 at 12:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the security of the electronic medical record (EMR) of one resident (R306) out of 29 residents reviewed. Findings Include: On 5/7/2025 at 9:30 AM, a medication cart on unit 300 was observed left unattended with the EMR screen open and displaying R306's PHI. The cart faced the hallway, which was actively used by staff and residents, exposing confidential details to unauthorized individuals. On 5/7/2025 at 9:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C exited R306 room and, upon interview, confirmed they left the art unsecured with PHI visible. LPN C acknowledged this was not in compliance with facility protocol. 05/07/25 9:53 AM, the unit manager (LPN) B was interviewed and said the computer should have been locked, and no medications should be left unattended on the cart. 05/07/25 10:52 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and confirmed staff are expected to follow facility policy regarding medication cart security,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided to one resident (R10) of three residents reviewed for routine dental services, resulting in unmet oral health needs. Findings include: On 5/6/2025 at 11:31 AM, R10 was observed in his room resident demonstrated he did not have teeth. When R10 was asked about his oral health he was not able to provide an answer. On 5/6/2025 at 11:36 AM, Guardian I was interviewed and stated, R10 needs to see the dentist to get dentures. Record review of R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Acute Cerebral vascular insufficiency (obstruction of blood flow to the brain) and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R10 revealed a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0/15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment and did not have the oral/dental status completed. Review of the Physician Orders dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the proper assistive device was provided to enhance and promote independence in eating for one resident (R126) of 30 residents observed during dining on the second floor, resulting in a potential for a decline in eating skills and abilities. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at approximately 10:00 A.M. R126 was interviewed concerning the breakfast meal. R126 was observed with two white towels rolled and positioned in each hand. R126 stated his meals were served in the restorative Dining Program. On days when R126 went to therapy, meals were left in the room and the resident fed himself. On 5/6/25 at 1:01 P.M., and 5/7/25 at 12:50 P.M., during a lunch meal observation R126 was observed being fed (1:1) by a nurse aide. R126's food was served on a regular China plate with the beverage served from a sippy cup. The tray card served with the meal on 5/6/25 stated: mechanical soft regular diet adaptive equipment: Scoop plate. On 5/8/25 at 9:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure relevant Hospice documentation was accessible for two residents (R28, R67) of nine hospice residents from a total of twenty-nine sampled residents, resulting in a lack of coordination of comprehensive services and care provided to the residents. Findings included: Resident # R28 (R28) On 5/7/25 at 11:57 AM nurse P was asked for the location of the Hospice Notebook for R 28. Nurse P indicated all the resident's visits should be in a binder located at the nurse's station. Nurse P searched the residents Hospice Notebook and acknowledged the visits were present, but no other hospice documentation was there. Nurse P indicated she would contact Unit Manager K. who could assist further. On 5/7/25 at 12:11 PM a review of the Hospice Notebook identified for R28 revealed there was no comprehensive assessment, consent for Hospice benefits, or Hospice comprehensive plan of care. On 5/7/25 at 12:20 PM Unit Manager (UM) K was unaware of where the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the Pneumococcal and Influenza vaccines to one resident (R10) of five residents reviewed for infection control resulting in the likelihood for increased risk for acquiring, transmitting and experiencing complications from the pneumonia and the flu. Findings Include: On 5/12/25 at 10:20 AM, the Infection Control Program was reviewed with the Infection Control Registered Nurse (RN) A. RN A was provided a list of residents to be reviewed for vaccinations. RN A provided documentation that R10 did sign to receive the Pneumococcal and Influenza vaccinations on 8/8/2024. There was no documentation that R10 had received either the Pneumococcal or Influenza vaccinations. RN A said she was unable to find the documentation that the vaccination was administered in the vaccination book or in the electronic medical record (EMR). 05/13/25 10:15 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and acknowledged that there was no documentation that R10 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00150096. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the standard of practice for medication administration for one (R101 of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint that R101 did not receive medications on 2/6/25 during the evening medication pass. On 3/25/25 at 10:00 AM R101 was observed in their room, seated in bed watching TV. R101 was interviewed regarding the complaint of missing medications. R101 was observed to open up a notebook and said, Yes, on February 6th I didn't get any of my medications that night. I was worried because I was supposed to get insulin and a blood pressure pill at that time. I didn't say anything to the nurse. The next morning the day shift nurse took my blood pressure and checked my blood sugar. Everything was OK, but it still bothers me that I didn't get my medications that night. R101 did not know who the nurse was on the afternoon/night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00150096. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have complete and accurate medical records for one (R101) of four residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in the medication administration record (MAR) left blank and the inability to determine what nurse was assigned to the resident according to the MAR. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint that R101 did not receive medications on 2/6/25 during the evening medication pass. On 3/25/25 at 10:00 AM R101 was observed in their room, seated in bed watching TV. R101 was interviewed regarding the complaint of missing medications. The resident opened up a notebook and said, Yes, on February 6th I didn't get any of my medications that night. I didn't say anything to the nurse. R101 did not know who the nurse was on the afternoon/night shift of 2/6/25. According to the resident's Electronic Health Records (EHR), R101 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI149002. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (thin flexible tube inserted through the skin of the abdomen into the stomach to deliver nutrition and hydration) tube care was provided including enteral/tube feedings (liquid nutrition delivered through a PEG tube) and water administration for one (R901) of three residents reviewed for PEG tube care, resulting in R901's not receiving the prescribed amount of enteral/tube feeding or water and peg tube care not being provided in accordance to the physician's orders. Findings include: On 1/6/25 at approximately 10:20 AM, R901 was observed lying in bed with tube feeding infusing through a PEG tube using an infusion pump to regulate the rate and amount. The tube feeding bag was unlabeled, undated, and there was no time to indicate when the tube feeding was hung. There was approximately 500 milliliters (ml) remaining in the tube feeding bag.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149002. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for one resident (R901) of three residents reviewed for wound and PEG tube care (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (thin flexible tube inserted through the skin of the abdomen into the stomach), resulting in the potential for the spread of infection. Findings include: On 1/6/25 at 10:30 AM, R901 was observed lying in bed with tube feeding running though a PEG tube by using an infusion pump to regulate the rate of feeding. R901's brief and gown were not covered by a sheet or blanket and were visibly soiled with a brownish liquid. A soiled split 4 x 4 gauze (pre-cut gauze dressing to allow the dressing to lay flat when covering an external catheter insertion site) was observed lying in the residents bed (not adhered to the resident) with dried dark reddish colored drainage on it. At this time Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen resulting in an increased potential for cross contamination of food and foodborne illness, potentially affecting 143 residents who receive meal services (3 nothing by mouth residents, or NPO) out of the facility's total census of 146 residents. Findings include: 1. On 4/17/24 at between 10:15 AM, and 10:42 AM, the following non-food contact surfaces in the kitchen were observed soiled and with visible debris on their surfaces: On the ventilation filters above the fryer. On the top and sides of the fryer. On the sides of the oven next to the fryer. On the grates of the flat top grill. On the six burner oven's stainless steel backsplash. Upon observation the surveyor inquired with Dietary Director, staff A, on if they thought these areas were being cleaned timely and sufficiently to which they replied, these areas are cleaned three times a day after each meal, but it looks like we can improve on it. On 4/17/24 at 11:25 AM, the surveyor requested a copy of the kitchen's cleaning policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the garbage storage area was maintained in sanitary condition resulting in an increased potential for the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings include: On 4/18/24 at 10:27 AM, during a tour of the facility with Dietary Manager, staff A, and Cook, staff E, the exterior trash dumpsters were observed with lids in the open position, along with a variety of trash, debris, and used fryer oil surrounding the area. At this time the surveyor inquired with staff A and staff E on the current state of the area to which staff E replied, They just picked it up today, every time they dump it, it looks like this, and they leave the doors open. At this time the surveyor asked staff A if the facility had a waste disposal policy to review to which they stated, yes, I'll get you a copy. On 4/19/24 at 9:27 AM, record review of a policy dated, 4/2015, and titled, Waste Disposal revealed in item number five that, Outside dumpsters will be maintained in a clean manner. Trash will not be overflowing and lids will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the 2nd floor 'wireless' nurse call light system was effectively utilized by staff or had consistently functioning centralized monitor screens on the second floor resulting in the potential for delayed call light response times, and the potential for resident care needs of 47 residents to be unmet. Findings include: On 4/17/24 at 1:36 PM, upon an environmental tour of the facility, resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bedside nurse call devices cord was observed frayed and taped over in two sections. At this time the surveyor tested the nurse call device at the bedside and went to the nurse's station to determine its functionality. Upon entering the nurses station, the surveyor heard no audible alarm, however the bedside nurse call device was shown flashing on a computer monitor. On 4/17/24 at 1:37 PM, upon interview with Registered Nurse, staff C, on the lack of an audible alarm being present for the nurse call system they stated, Oh, it works. We just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain dignity by not dressing one resident (R16) in personal clothing out of one resident reviewed for dignity, resulting in verbal frustration and impaired mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: On 4/16/2024 at 12:26 p.m., R16 was observed in the hallway sitting in a wheelchair fully dressed. R16 reported there was a problem wearing other resident's clothes. R16 stated, These clothes I am wearing are not [NAME] and I want to wear my clothes that I came into the facility with. The clothes R16's was wearing revealed no resident's name. Observed R16' s closet with a coat, three jackets, two sweaters, one blouse with pants and a blanket. R16 was asked how it feels to wear other resident's clothes. R16 head drop with a saddenned face and stated, I don't like it, I don't know who had those clothes on and I don't want to wear them. On 4/18/2024 at 10:02 a.m. R16 reported while dressed in a gown in bed, wanting to be dressed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for one resident (R43) and a wheelchair provided for one resident (R108) of six residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in unmet care needs. Findings include: R43 On 4/16/2024 at 12:32 p.m., R43 was observed lying in bed with no call light within reach. During an interview, R43 was looking for the call light to get assistance to be repositioned and confirmed being uncomfortable. R43 stated, I can't find it (the call light). On 4/16/2024 at 1240 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H was interviewed regarding the call light use and purpose. LPN H said, the purpose of a call light is to call for assistance. LPN H confirmed the call light was not within reach for R43. LPN H reported resident needed to be repositioned for comfort and safety. According to the electronic medical records, R43 was admitted into the facility on 8/18/2023 with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulties in swallowing),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening (PAS)/ Annual Resident (ARR) Mental Illness/ Intellectual Disability/ Related Conditions Identification forms DCH-3877 and/or DCH-3878) documents were reviewed, revised, and sent to the local state agency for review and/or evaluation for intellectual/ developmental disability needs for one (R21) of three residents reviewed for PASSARs, resulting in the potential for unmet intellectual/ developmental disability care needs. Findings include: Review of an admission Level I screen dated 1/29/24 revealed R21 had no mental illness or dementia. R21 did not have a Level I screen after 1/29/24. Review of an admission Record revealed, R21 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included bipolar disorder and paranoid personality. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated of 2/3/24 revealed R21 had cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15 and took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise care plans in a timely manner for two residents (R18 and R121) out of thirty residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R18 During an observation on 4/17/24 at 10:25 AM, R18 had bilateral above the knee amputations and two open wounds on the bottom back side of right leg. Record review of electronic medical records revealed admission into the facility on 5/18/23 with pertinent diagnosis of acquired absence of right and left leg above knee. According to the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE]. R18 had slight impaired cognition and required substantial assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Record review of R18's Transition of Care Form dated 6/8/23, documented the following: . Primary Diagnosis: Above the knee amputation of left lower extremity. Record review of R18's active care plans revealed the following: Focus: R18 has Actual impairment to skin integrity r/t (related to) vascular ulcers to left calf, left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an appropriate discharge plan to return to the community (home) for one (R79) out of three residents sampled for discharge planning, resulting in a loss of independence, unmet psychosocial needs, and support from family. Findings include: On 4/16/24 at 2:48 p.m. R79 was observed in bed resting. The resident angrily expressed wanting to know discharge plans, I have been her for two months. I'm not getting therapy. I'm not doing anything but laying here. I have everything I need at home. I keep being told I have to wait for the doctor to discharge me, but he hasn't been in here to see me. I want to go home! R79 was alert, oriented to person, place, and situation, and expressed needs and feelings. On 4/17/24 at 12:10 p.m. review of the clinical record documented R79 was initially admitted into the facility on 1/3/24 and readmitted from the hospital on 2/7/24 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide nail care, scheduled showers, and assist with transfers out of bed for two residents (R13 and R100) out of thirty residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Findings Include: R100 During an observation and interview on 4/16/24 at 12:57 PM, R100 was observed lying in bed with long fingernails with debris underneath nails. Resident reported that he would like his nails to be cut and cleaned. Record review of R100's Functional Ability Deficit care plan dated 12/14/23, documented Personal Hygiene- Resident is dependent. Further review of care plans and nursing progress notes revealed no preference for long nails or refusing nail care by resident in the last month. Record review of R100's electronic medical records revealed admission into the facility on 9/3/20 with a pertinent diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R18 had intact cognition and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and monitoring of wounds for one resident (R18) out of three residents reviewed for wound care management. Findings Include: During an observation and interview on 4/17/24 at 10:25 AM, R18 two open wounds on the bottom back side of right leg that measured approximately 0.5 cm (Centimeters) long and 0.5 cm wide with a depth of 0.1 cm each. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G reported being made aware of wounds on 4/15/24. Record review of electronic medical records revealed admission into the facility on 5/18/23 with pertinent diagnosis of acquired absence of right and left leg above knee. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R18 had slight impaired cognition and required substantial assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Record review of Nurses Notes dated 4/7/24 at 12:57 PM documented the following: Note Text: Writer found two open areas to right stump. CNA (certified nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide vision services for one resident (R13) of two residents reviewed for assistive devices, resulting in inadequate eyewear for R13. Findings include: During an observation and interview with R13, on 4/16/2024 at 10:40 a.m., the resident was observed wearing a pair of reading glasses and holding the glasses with hand and tape on the right side of the frame (arm), while reading some literature in bed. R13 said the glasses had been broken for about two weeks and everyone knew and saw the glasses was taped up. R13 said the glasses are not prescription glasses and the reading glasses were brought in by brother from the store, because no one at the facility was assisting with getting another pair. The prescription glasses had been lost about two years at the hospital. R13 confirmed the prescription glasses were needed to see when watching television, reading and everything else. The resident further reported several requests made to social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the standards of infection control for proper PPE use (gloves), hand hygiene, and point of care testing, for one resident (R79) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in the potential for increased cross-contamination of diseases which place a vulnerable population at high risk for infections. Findings include: In an observation on 4/18/24 at 8:14 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) P entered R79's room with blood glucose supplies in hand with gloved hands. LPN P placed the glucometer (used to test blood sugar levels) on R79's bed and not on a barrier. LPN P then poked R79's finger with lancet and collected blood in the glucometer strip. LPN P removed the gloves, disposed the lancet in sharps box, exited the room and did not perform hand hygiene. In an observation on 4/18/24 at 8:17 a.m., LPN P placed the glucometer in the med cart and did not clean it after use. LPN P did not perform hand hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00141762. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate resident identifying documents and medical records upon emergent transfer to the hospital for one resident (R601) of three residents reviewed for emergency transfer, resulting in resident identification and medical information not being sent with EMS (Emergency Medical Service) personnel to the hospital and the potential for unmet care needs upon transfer. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed, R601 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included Atrial Fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 12/13/23 revealed R601 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15. Review of Physicians order revealed, R601 had an order transfer to ER (emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to transmission-based precautions during meal pass on Unit 300, resulting in the potential for the spread of harmful pathogens among the residents in the building. Findings include: On 10/24/23 at 8:43 AM, the door to an isolation room (Room XX) was opened. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C closed the door and said the resident in Room XX was diagnosed with COVID-19. During an observation on 10/24/23 at 12:43 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G entered isolation Room XX to deliver a lunch meal tray without donning person protection equipment (PPE). A sign on the door to Room XX indicated the room was occupied by a resident on contact and droplet precautions. On 10/24/23 at 12:45 PM, a second meal tray was delivered to isolation Room XX by CNA H who donned a face shield, gloves, mask, and gown prior to entering the room. CNA H was observed exiting the isolation room into the hallway with the gown still on. CNA H said she was supposed to take it off in the room but was looking for a bag. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00138233 and MI00139515. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were provided in a timely manner for two residents (R134 and R139) out of seven residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in resident apprehension and the potential for unmet health care needs. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that the facility was short staffed and residents were getting their medications late. R134 On 10/24/23 at 8:44 AM the Medication Administration Records (MARs) for Unit 400 were reviewed with LPN C. The MAR for Resident #134 (R134) who resided on Unit 400 was colored red. LPN C said when the MAR was red that signified the medication administration is late. R134 was scheduled to receive four units of Lispro (fast-acting) insulin at 7:00 AM. LPN C said the insulin should have been administered by 7:59 AM at the lastest. On 10/24/23 at 8:50 AM, R134 was observed awake and in bed with his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00138483 and MI00139515. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were accurately documented as administered per physician's orders for R120 and 125 resulting in inaccurate and incomplete medical records. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that staff were not following physician's orders for medication administration. A review of the clinical record for Resident #120 (R120) documented an admission to the facility on 5/2/23 with diagnoses that included hypertension, dysphagia, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented moderate cognitive impairment. A review of R120's September 2023 and October 2023 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed no documented entries for the administration of the following medications: - Atorvastatin 40 mg tablet for hypertension on 9/8/23 - Mirtazapine 7.5 MG tablet for dysphagia on 9/8/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00129879 and MI00130059. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the family/resident representative of a change in condition for one resident (R195) of five residents reviewed for change in condition, resulting in the family not knowing the resident had a skin tear. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed, Resident #195 (R195) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included COVID-19. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 6/29/22, revealed R195 had cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15. Review of a progress note for R195 with a date of 6/26/23/22 at 10:50 a.m. revealed, Late Entry . pt (patient) has old bruise on right arm that opened small skin tear noted wound care was done and cleaned and wrapped with kerlix. will notify wound care to evaluate. The progress note was created on 6/26/22 at 10:56 a.m. Review of a progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00129879. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and implement timely skin care for one resident (#195) out of three residents reviewed for skin conditions, resulting in delay in treating skin concerns and the potential for other skin care needs to go undetected. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed, Resident #195 (R195) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included COVID-19. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 6/29/22 revealed R195 had cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15. Review of a progress note for R195 with a date of 6/23/22 at 10:50 a.m. revealed, Late Entry . pt (patient) has old bruise on right arm that opened small skin tear noted wound care was done and cleaned and wrapped with kerlix. will notify wound care to evaluate. Review of a progress note with a date of 6/27/22 at 4:45 a.m. revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-13 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00131349. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician supervised one of one reviewed for resident's medical care (R196) resulting in the lack of physician involvement for two facility aquired pressure ulcers. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint that R196 developed pressure ulcers that went untreated while at the facility from 8/3/22 - 8/15/22 when he was quarantined for Covid-19. According to R196's Electronic Health Record (EHR), the resident directly admitted into the facility's Covid unit from another long-term care facility on 8/3/22 because he tested positive for Covid-19. R196 had additional diagnoses that included vascular dementia and cellulitis of his left lower leg, right foot/3rd toe, and right lateral heel. admission orders included prescribed skin treatments for left lower leg, right foot/3rd toe and right lateral heel every day adn prn (as needed). According to a nurse's progress note dated 8/4/22 at 12:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00131349. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two residents (R195 and R196) reviewed for comprehensive and accurate medical records, resulting in an inaccurate reflection of the resident's medical condition and treatments along with the potential for providers to not have an accurate picture of the residents's status and condition. Findings include: Resident #196 (R196) The State Agency received a complaint that R196 developed pressure ulcers that were not treated while at the facility during Covid-19 quarantine from 8/3/22 - 8/15/22. According to R196's Electronic Health Record (EHR), the resident directly admitted into the facility's Covid unit from another long-term care facility on 8/3/22 because he tested positive for Covid-19. R196 had additional diagnoses that included cellulitis of his left lower leg and right foot/3rd toe and right lateral heel. According to a nurse's progress note dated 8/4/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-05-13 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for one resident (R134) of one resident reviewed for MDS assessments, resulting in the potential for inaccurate and inadequate care plans. Findings include: A review of R134's electronic medical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. R134's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15/15 (cognitively intact). R134 was discharged from the facility on 11/27/2024. A review of R134's electronic medical record revealed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) being over 120 days. On 05/12/2025 at 12:48 pm, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) MDS Nurse Y was interviewed and queried about the MDS assessment being over 120 days. The MDS Nurse Y did not respond when queried about receiving alerts of late assessments. On 5/12/2025 at 1:15pm The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and queried about the MDS assessment being over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,593 — penalty dated 2024-04-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/21/1998 |
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/21/1998 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/25/2025 |
| GARNER-LUCAS, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/08/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235422. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.