No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Laurels Of Athens, The

70 Columbus Circle, Athens, OH 45701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 111 certified beds · (740) 592-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Apr 2026Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$38,912 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Apr 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $38,912 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-20)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
199 Columbus Rd · (740) 593-3191 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs1.0 mi
555 E State St · (740) 593-8501 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Selifoods0.3 mi
94 Columbus Rd · (614) 927-1123 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
67 Columbus Rd · (740) 593-6444

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.5%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.0%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.6%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.2%12.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.451.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.101.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.5%CMS range 44.0–55.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.9–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 5.1–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.96
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.22
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.64
RN hoursweekends
41.6%
Total nursing turnover
42.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 102.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-20)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, hospital record review, review of information on www.lung.org, review of facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment, appropriate supervision and implement safe smoking practices for Resident #11, a resident who had been incorrectly identified as a safe/independent smoker despite being noncompliant and unable to manage safe smoking interventions independently. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on 03/21/26 when Resident #11 smoked in the designated smoking area while oxygen was in use via nasal cannula, resulting in ignition caused by smoking in the presence of oxygen. The resident sustained facial burns requiring emergency medical intervention. The resident was subsequently transferred to the hospital where she received treatment for the burns to her face and mouth. The emergency room determined the resident should be intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation due to her burns (the resident's mouth was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, hospital record review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #78 received timely, comprehensive and individualized care following a fall with injury. Actual harm occurred beginning on 12/02/24 at approximately 4:30 A.M. when Resident #78 experienced an unwitnessed fall with evidence of complaints of pain after the incident; however, the resident did not timely receive as needed pain medication until 8:44 A.M. or an x-ray of the area until 12/03/24 at 11:50 A.M. On 12/03/24 at 1:15 P.M. x-ray results revealed the resident had a displaced fracture of the left femoral head and was transferred to the hospital for surgical intervention. This affected one resident (#78) of two residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #78 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with mood disturbance, chronic kidney disease, mood disorder, depression, anxiety and history of transient ischemic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with hygiene received showers/bathing and shaving as per their preference/plan of care/schedule. The affected five (#5, #8, #9, #70, and #76) of 12 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 98.Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis and radiculopathy. Review of a care plan dated 02/08/24 revealed Resident #8 had a functional ability deficit and required assistance with self-care/mobility related to status-post L2-L5 decompression fixation fusion. The goals included discharge home to prior living arrangements, improving current level of functioning, and improve mobility. Interventions included but were not limited to encourage resident to participate in self-care as much as able, provide positive reinforcement for all activities attempted, praise…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy and dignity were maintained when a urinary catheter drainage bag was not covered and urine was exposed. This affected one (#92) of one resident reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 98.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #92 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of esophagus and type II diabetes mellitus.Review of a care plan dated 03/31/26 revealed Resident #92 was at risk for a urinary tract infection and catheter-related trauma related to having an indwelling catheter in place for urinary retention. The goals included showing no signs and symptoms of urinary infection through review date and the catheter would remain patent and without complications through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to ensure catheter tubing is secured and ensure the drainage bag is secured properly with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of a self-reported incident, review of the facility investigation and policy review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident narcotics. This affected one resident (Resident #99) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #99 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension and anemia.Review of orders revealed Resident #99 had an order in place dated 11/14/25 for oxycodone oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain.Review of a care plan dated 11/17/25 revealed Resident #99 was at risk for pain and has chronic pain related to internal orthopedic device and left knee pain. Goals included verbalizing adequate relief of pain or ability to cope with incompletely resolved pain through the review date and state relief of pain daily through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had an active care plan in place to address her diagnosis of anxiety disorder requiring the use of anti-anxiety medications. This affected one (Resident #100) of 30 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include Review of Resident #100's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included the diagnosis of depression. Review of Resident #100's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Buspirone (an anti-anxiety medication) 5 milligrams by mouth twice a day for anxiety. The order originated on 02/11/26. She also had an order to receive Vistaril (an antihistamine medication used in the treatment of anxiety disorder) 25 mg by mouth three times a day for anxiety. That order originated on 02/12/26. Review of Resident #100's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was coded on the MDS assessment as having received an anti-anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect current fall interventions. This affected one (#86) of six residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #86 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, type II diabetes, and dementia.Review of a care plan dated 03/10/26 revealed Resident #86 was at risk for fall related injury and falls related to history and fear of falling. The goal was to be free from injury related to falls through the review date. Review of a nursing note dated 03/25/26 at 9:03 P.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #336 revealed Resident #86 went to the hospital. The note did not contain additional information.Interview on 04/07/26 at 12:50 P.M. with Resident #86 revealed he had a fall and had to be sent to the hospital. Resident #86 did not specify a date.Further review of the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to identify and treat new skin areas. This affected one (#8) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents did not go more than three days without a bowel movement without receiving interventions. This affected one (#99) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 98. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis and radiculopathy. Review of a care plan dated 11/10/25 revealed Resident #8 was at risk for impaired skin integrity/pressure injury related to decreased mobility, current surgical wound, type II diabetes, hypertension, history of moisture associated skin damage (MASD), anemia, and morbid obesity. The goal was to minimize risk in an effort to reduce likelihood of pressure injury development through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents, who had significant weight loss and/ or were at nutritional risk, had their meal consumption amounts recorded to show adequate monitoring of their nutritional status. This affected two (Resident #5 and #12) of three residents reviewed for nutrition/ weight loss. Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia, adult-onset diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and Vitamin B-12 and D deficiencies. Review of Resident #12's weights revealed her weights were trending down. She weighed 154.4 pounds when she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her weight three months later on 09/04/25 was 140 pounds. Her last weight on 04/02/26 was 130 pounds. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a tracheostomy tube had appropriate medical emergency equipment at her bedside to include an Ambu bag (resuscitation bag). The facility also failed to ensure another resident had a physician's order for the administration of oxygen, prior to its use. This affected two (Resident #9 and #39) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels in the blood), tracheostomy status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and chronic pulmonary edema. Review of Resident #9's active physician's orders revealed she had an order in place for 28% humidified oxygen set up with oxygen bleed via a tracheostomy collar to keep his oxygen saturation levels in his blood greater than 90%. Tracheostomy care was to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to identify and document trauma triggers on the care plans of residents with post traumatic stress disorder. This affected two residents (#78 and #109) of three sampled for behavioral/emotional concerns. The facility census was 98.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/30/19 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, wandering in diseases classified elsewhere, delusional disorders, insomnia, major depressive disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), psychotic disorder with delusions, anxiety disorder, and drug induced subacute dyskinesia (erratic, uncontrollable and involuntary movements caused by some medications after long-term use). Review of Resident #78's trauma care plan, initiated 07/14/23 revealed Resident #78 had experienced trauma at some point in the past via a past abusive relationship. Further review of the care plan revealed no identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were documented accurately in the medical record. This affected one (#99) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 98.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #99 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension and anemia.Review of orders revealed Resident #99 had an order in place dated 11/14/25 for oxycodone oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain.Review of a care plan dated 11/17/25 revealed Resident #99 was at risk for pain and has chronic pain related to internal orthopedic device and left knee pain. Goals included verbalizing adequate relief of pain or ability to cope with incompletely resolved pain through the review date and state relief of pain daily through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to administer medications as ordered and observe for effectiveness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of meal times, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication that was given to a resident for the treatment of osteoporosis was administered in accordance with the physician's orders and on an empty stomach to increase the absorption of the medication. They also failed to ensure a resident receiving a beta-blocker for the treatment of hypertension had her apical pulse checked prior to the administration of the medication as ordered by the physician with parameters in place to hold the medication if the resident's heart rate was less than 60 beats per minute (bpm). This affected two (Resident #12 and #100) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #100's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of Resident #100's active physician's orders revealed the resident had an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy, the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity (UA C&S) was obtained per orders. This affected one resident (Resident #8) of one resident reviewed for urinary tract infection (UTI). The facility census was 98. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis and radiculopathy.Review of a care plan dated 02/09/24 revealed Resident #8 was at risk for incontinence of bladder, skin breakdown, and UTI due to diagnoses of overactive bladder. The goal was for risk of septicemia to be minimized/prevented via prompt recognition and treatment of symptoms of UTI through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to administer medications as ordered, observe for/document for signs and symptoms of UTI and report to physician if indicated.Review of an orders revealed an order dated 10/17/25 for Resident #8 to receive a UA C&S one time only for dysuria (painful…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record was maintained. This affected four (#9, #12, #76, and #86) of 30 resident records reviewed for a complete and accurate medical record. The facility census was 98. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #86 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, type II diabetes, and dementia. Review of a care plan dated 03/10/26 revealed Resident #86 was at risk for fall related injury and falls related to history and fear of falling. The goal was to be free from injury related to falls through the review date. Review of a nursing note dated 03/25/26 at 9:03 P.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #336 revealed Resident #86 went to the hospital. The note did not contain additional information. Review of an eInteract Change in Condition assessment dated [DATE] revealed the assessment had been opened but was blank. Review of a fall investigation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed in between glove changes during tracheostomy care, failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter's collection bag was maintained off the floor, and failed to ensure shared glucometers were properly disinfected between each use. This affected one (Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care, one (Resident #92) of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters, and had the potential to affect three residents (Resident #19, #28, and #79), who the facility identified as having the use of the shared glucometer on the 700 Hall. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen level in the blood), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified asthma, chronic pulmonary edema, and tracheostomy status. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform and obtain consent from Resident #44's guardian before administration of a COVID-19 vaccination. This affected one resident of six sampled for vaccinations. The facility census was 98.Findings include:Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/23/21, a re-entry date of 11/18/25 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, and a history of falling.Review of Resident #44's consent/declination of COVID-19 vaccination form revealed a consent for the vaccination signed on 04/15/25 by Resident #44's former guardian.Review of Resident #44's immunization record revealed the resident received a COVID-19 vaccination on 04/15/25.Review of Resident #44's guardianship paperwork revealed the resident's nephew became his guardian on 07/10/25.Review of Resident #44's immunization record revealed the resident received a COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of meal tickets, review of menus/ spreadsheets to include special diets, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for residents receiving consistent carbohydrate (CCHO) diets. This affected four residents (Resident #86, #88, #159, and #214) that were observed for tray preparation during tray line for the lunch meal served on 12/11/24. It had the potential to affect 31 other residents (Resident #4, #5, #6, #9, #10, #16, #17, #21, #22, #30, #34, #36, #39, #41, #44, #45, #51, #66, #68, #69, #73, #75, #80, #81, #82, #89, #101, #209, #210, #212, and #215) who were identified by the facility as being on a CCHO diet. Findings include: On 12/11/24 at 11:35 A.M., an observation of the tray line for the lunch meal served revealed dietary staff dipped the trays for the 900 hall first. The residents were receiving beef and noodle casserole, Normandy vegetables, one slice of bread of choice, and two chocolate chip cookies. Four residents (Resident #86, #88, #159, and #214) whose trays were dipped and loaded on the food cart for the 900…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of shower schedules, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were dependent on staff for personal care received the assistance needed for scheduled showers. This affected one (Resident #66) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included surgical aftercare following cardiovascular procedure, presence of coronary artery bypass graft, type II (adult onset) diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) major depressive disorder, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #66's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a minimal difficulty with hearing and clear speech. She was able to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with the use of supplemental oxygen had a physician's order for the use of oxygen and nebulizer equipment was properly cleaned/ stored when not in use. This affected one (Resident #210) of one residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of Resident #210's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), dependence on supplemental oxygen, and sleep apnea. Review of Resident #210's active care plans revealed the resident had a care plan in place for having a potential for difficulty breathing and risk for respiratory complications related to acute on chronic hypoxic respiratory failure, CHF, COPD, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, oxygen dependence, and being a smoker. The goal was for the resident to display optimal breathing pattern…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with a diagnosis of dementia had a comprehensive and individualized treatment plan to ensure behaviors, including inappropriate dress when visible to others, were addressed to promote independence and dignity. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of one residents reviewed for dignity. The census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/23/12, a reentry date of 01/25/22 and diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, unspecified convulsions, unspecified intellectual disabilities, dementia, hypothyroidism, and anemia. Review of Resident#1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 10/03/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating the resident was moderately impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #1 required supervision or touching assistance with transfers from seated to standing and with ambulation during the look back period. Review of Resident #1's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a facility self-reported incident, facility investigation review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident narcotics. This affected one Resident (Resident #28) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 94. Findings included: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, aphasia (difficulty understanding what is being said or difficulty formulating speech due to injuries to certain parts of the brain), anxiety, depression, insomnia, and cardiovascular disease. Review of Resident #28's fluctuation in mood plan of care initiated on 12/21/20 and revised on 06/19/24 revealed the resident had fluctuations in mood related to dementia, anxiety, mood disorder, insomnia, and reactive agitation for mood stabilizer. Her anxiety included anxiousness, pacing back and forth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a self-reported incident, review of the facilities investigation for the self-reported incident, observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation of controlled medication was thoroughly investigated. This affected one Resident (Resident #28) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, aphasia, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and cardiovascular disease. Review of Resident #28's fluctuation in mood plan of care initiated on 12/21/20 and revised on 06/19/24 revealed the resident had fluctuations in mood related to dementia, anxiety, mood disorder, insomnia, and reactive agitation for mood stabilizer. Her anxiety included anxiousness, pacing back and forth and wringing hands. The resident intervention included administering medication as ordered and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure controlled medication were signed out when administered and medication were properly labeled and packaged. This had the potential to affect all residents residing on 100, 200, 300, and 400 halls. Findings included: 1. Observation on 07/30/24 at 10:45 A.M. of 300 medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse ( LPN) #151 and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #26 had 25 Methadone 5 mg in the blister packet however the control drug record sheet indicated the resident should have 26 Methadone 5 mg. LPN #151 confirmed findings and reported she had administered a Methadone to Resident #26 this morning around 8:00 A.M., however she must have not signed it out on the control drug record sheet. Further observation of 300 medication carts revealed there were two whole pills and 6.5 1/2 tablets lying in the medication cart loose and unpackaged. LPN #151 confirmed the pills were not packaged and labeled and she would dispose of them. 2. Observation on 07/30/24 at 10:55 A.M. of 400 medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility documentation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 106 residents who were receiving food from the kitchen (a list provided by the facility revealed Resident #95 received nothing by mouth). The facility census was 107. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility logs titled, Food Temperature Record. dated 07/23/23 through 10/21/23, revealed the facility did not assess the temperature of any of their beverages, including milk, prior to them being served. Further review of the form revealed coffee should be 180 degrees, milk should be 35 degrees, and juice should be less or equal to 40 degrees. Interview on 10/23/23 at 8:55 A.M. with the Dietary Staff #3 verified the facility did not temperature check their beverages, including their milk, prior to it being served. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Temperatures, revised 11/12/21, revealed foods will be maintained at proper temperature to ensure food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect 106 residents who were receiving food from the kitchen (a list provided by the facility revealed Resident #95 received nothing by mouth). The facility census was 107. Findings included: 1. Observation on 10/23/23 at 8:35 A.M. revealed the walk-in freezer in the kitchen with a blanket folded in half and lying on the floor in front of the door. An interview at the time with Dietary Staff Staff #3 revealed the seal on the walk-in freezer door had not been working properly and the door didn't close properly. He revealed due to the seal not working, there was ice accumulation in the freezer unit, and he had to chip the ice away every Monday morning. Observation of the interior of the walk-in freezer revealed ice accumulation on the floor, racks, food and mechanical unit. This surveyor walked into the freezer to attempt to read the thermometer and the floor was covered in ice and a safety concern. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their money on evenings and weekends. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents (#1, #3, #4, #5, #7, #9, #10, #11, #13, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #22, #23, #25, #28, #29, #30, #32, #35, #36, #37, #41, #43, #45, #46, #48, #49, #51, #53, #54, #58, #61, #64, #65, #67, #68, #72, #74, #76, #80, #84, #85, #86, #87, #93, #96, and #105) for whom the facility managed resident personal funds accounts. The facility census was 107. Findings included: Interview on 10/26/23 at 1:34 P.M. with Business Office Manager #86 verified residents only had access to funds Monday through Friday from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. She revealed there was no petty cash residents could access on the evenings or on the weekends. Observation on 10/26/23 at 1:40 P.M. of signage in the window of the front office of the facility revealed Banking Hours, Monday thru Friday, 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Review of the facility form titled, Trust - Current Account Balances as of 10/26/23 by Posting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure puree meals were prepared to the correct consistency for consumption. This had the potential to affect five residents (#21, #28, #40, #54, and #69) who were ordered pureed diets. The facility census was 107. Findings included: Observation on 10/25/23 at 10:45 A.M. revealed Dietary Staff #81 pureeing eight servings of baked ziti. She placed the baked ziti in the robot coup and pureed it for approximately 15 seconds. Dietary Staff #81 looked at and tasted the baked ziti then reported to this surveyor it was ready to be served. As this surveyor was placing her spoon in the pureed baked ziti, Dietary Staff #3 looked at the pureed baked ziti and reported it wasn't ready and needed some beef broth added to it. This surveyor then tasted the pureed baked ziti and found it to be very sticky, gummy, and clung to the roof of the surveyor's mouth like peanut butter, not pudding. Dietary Staff #3 then tasted the pureed ziti and reported it was not quite ready to be served. Dietary Staff #3 gave Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, difficulty in walking and chronic kidney disease, stage two. Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/27/23, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #26's physician order, dated 08/21/23, identified his advanced directives were do not resuscitate comfort care arrest (DNR-CCA). Review of Resident #26's documentation titled admission Record, dated 07/19/22, and the first form seen in the unit advanced directives binder revealed he was a do not resuscitate comfort care (DNR-CC). Further review of Resident #26's documentation in the unit advanced directives binder and tucked behind the admission Record revealed an Ohio DNR Order Form, dated 08/23/23, which revealed he had chosen DNR-CCA. Interview on 10/23/23 at 2:50 P.M. with Resident #26 revealed he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's electronic medical record was maintained in a confidential manner. This affected one resident (Resident #7) during a random observation made during the course of the annual survey. The facility census was 107. Findings include: On 10/25/23 at 9:38 A.M., a random observation of a medication administration cart for the 600 hall noted the medication cart to be left unattended in the hallway. There were no staff present at the medication administration cart and no staff in the general vicinity. The medication administration cart had a computer on top of the cart. The computer was on and had Resident #7's electronic medication administration record (eMAR) displayed on the screen. The eMAR included a picture of the resident, her room location, her date of birth , known allergies, her code status, and four of the medications displayed on that page. Among the medications that were shown were Lasix, Ativan, Miralax, and Tylenol Extra Strength. The computer screen remained on displaying that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure personal hygiene and bathing was completed for dependent residents. This affected two residents (#23 and #37) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, peripheral vascular disease, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #37's Care Plan: ADL Self Care Performance Deficit revised 03/14/23 revealed the resident required assistance with ADL's, had impaired range of motion of bilateral hands/fingers, and chose to decline personal care at times. Resident #37 had no bathing time preference and preferred activities of daily living to be completed in the afternoon. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was severely impaired for daily decision-making and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, policy review, and observations the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place for two residents with history of falls. This affected two residents (#51 and #76) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 107. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, neuropathy, osteoarthritis, hydrocephalus, and depression. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) completed on 10/01/23 revealed resident had intact cognition, had no behaviors, is independent for self-care and indoor mobility, had no impairment to bilateral upper extremities, was impaired to a lower extremity on one side, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #76's orders revealed fall interventions including padded bilateral enabler rails, left side of the bed against the wall, low bed with fall mat to the right of the bed, and over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, resident record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the appropriate enabler bars on his bed and failed to ensure the resident's assessment was accurate for the type of devices used on his bed. This affected one resident (#26) of four residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 107. Findings included: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity, generalized muscle weakness, and spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy of the lumbar region. Review of Resident #26's plan of care, dated, 05/18/22, revealed he had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit and required assistance with ADL's and mobility related to activity intolerance, decreased endurance and weakness secondary to COPD. One of the interventions identified he was to have bilateral enabler bars to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, drug information review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate did not exceed 5%. The facility had four medication errors out of 31 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 12%. This affected two residents (#35 and #36) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. On 10/25/23 at 8:25 A.M., a medication administration observation was completed for Resident #35. Registered Nurse (RN) #191 was the nurse that administered the medications to the resident for his 8:00 A.M. medication pass. Among the medications the resident received was Creon ( a medication that contains digestive enzymes to help break down and digest fats, starch, and proteins in food) 12-38-60 two capsules by mouth. The label on the blister card the Creon was dispensed in instructed the nurse to give six capsules by mouth with meals. The nurse woke the resident up to take his medications and he was not noted to have breakfast at the time the medication was given. The nurse was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store medications when not being administered. This affected one resident (#5) that was observed for medication storage at the medication cart. The facility census was 107. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 03/02/22 with the diagnoses of: Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance with two plus person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, and extensive assistance with one-person physical assist with toilet use. Observation on 10/24/23 at 6:41 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #153 revealed Resident #5 had medication tablets in a medicine cup, a patch, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to demonstrate proper hand washing and proper storage of COVID 19 personal protective equipment (PPE). This affected two residents (#5 and #23) of the two residents reviewed for handwashing and proper storage of equipment. The facility census was 107. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 03/02/22 with the diagnoses of: Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance with two plus person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, and extensive assistance with one-person physical assist with toilet use. Observation on 10/24/23 at 6:30 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #153 exiting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$38,912 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $38,912 — penalty dated 2026-04-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2016
KHAN, ANISIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
STOBB, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
CLELAND, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/19/2022
LLOYD, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$614K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 49%Medicare 14%Other / private 37%

This home reported $614K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,434per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$311per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366396. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next