Courtney Manor
1167 E Hopson Street, Bad Axe, MI 48413 · For profit - Individual · 125 certified beds · (989) 269-9983 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.1% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.2% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.2% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.7% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.6% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.4% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.15 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.02 | 1.64 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.9%CMS range 44.4–59.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 8.0–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.3–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 81.6 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.69 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.90 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number 2724891. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that interventions were implemented to ensure a safe environment for one resident (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in Resident #2 being transferred without an electronic lift which was required by the plan of care, resulting in Resident #2 sustaining several lacerations and a transfer to the hospital. Findings Include: Resident #2:A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Heart failure, history of falls, chronic kidney disease, history of a stroke, hypertension, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation, left leg pain, arthritis and asthma. The MDS assessment, dated 11/26/2025, indicated the resident had full cognitive abilities with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 15/15 and the resident needed assistance with all care and was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide pain management for two residents (Resident #138, Resident #139) of 6 residents reviewed for pain management, resulting in the residents' verbalizations of unrelieved pain, frustration and helplessness. Findings Include: Resident #138: Pain Management A record review of the Face sheet and electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #138 indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: pancreatic cancer, right upper quadrant abdominal swelling, mass and lump, anemia, diabetes, anxiety, depression, malignant ascites (fluid build up in abdomen), heart disease, right buttock Stage 2 pressure ulcer, left buttock Stage 3 pressure ulcer and GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease). The resident was receiving Hospice services and died on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:30 AM, Resident #138 was heard moaning loudly from his room. Upon entry into his room, the resident was observed lying in bed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number 2739781.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that grievances or concerns were addressed per the facility policy for concerns/grievances for one resident (Resident #6), who had concerns voiced during meetings with the State Ombudsman, of three residents reviewed for complaints. Findings include:Resident #6 (R6):A review of R6's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 1/6/26 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, depression, anxiety disorder, paranoid personality disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. A review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 that indicated intact cognition and that the Resident needed partial/moderate assistance with dressing, substantial/maximal assistance with bathing and was dependent on a helper with toileting hygiene and chair/bed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that there was adequate staff available to meets the needs of the residents, resulting in resident verbalizations of waiting long periods of time to answer call lights and receive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), including toileting and incontinence care, for a Confidential Group of Residents from a census of 78 residents Findings Include: FACILITY Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing: During a review of the facility Offsite survey preparation dated 1/1/2026, the document indicated the facility had Low weekend staffing for the 4th Fiscal Year quarter in 2025; this was July 2025- September 2025. A further review of the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 4 2025 (July1 - September 30) identified Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. The document also provided, Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. On 1/6/2026 at 11:46 AM, the Director of Nursing and Administrator were interviewed and asked about the PBJ…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food-borne illnesses to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 01/05/2026 at 9:30am-10:05am, during the initial kitchen tour with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) A and Dietician B, this surveyor observed a bag of pepperoni with a discard date of 12/24/25 inside the walk-in refrigerator. When interviewed, CDM A stated that the pepperoni should have been thrown out and proceeded to throw out the pepperoni. On 01/05/2026 at 9:30am-10:05am this surveyor observed a bag of shredded lettuce with a best by date of 1/2/26 inside the walk-in refrigerator and CDM A proceeded to throw away the bag of shredded lettuce. On 01/05/2026 at 9:30am-10:05am the sanitizer bucket sitting on the counter in the main dining area was tested with Hydrion QT-40 test strips and the result was zero. When interviewed on what range the sanitizer should be in, CDM A stated they keep the solution between 150-400ppm and they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' needs were met timely and failed to ensure that call lights were not discontinued without residents' needs being met for three residents (R2, R7, R70) of four residents sampled and a confidential group of residents, resulting in feelings of unimportance and incontinence. Findings include:Resident #7: R7 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include metabolic encephalopathy, altered mental status, muscle wasting and major depressive disorder. On 01/05/2026 at 1:02PM, an interview was conducted with a family member present in the room. The family member of R7 stated that the call light wait time is an average of 20 minutes and sometimes it can be even longer. The family member also stated, I understand they are low on staff, but when you need to use the bathroom, it can be a long time for someone to sit and wait. The family member was asked if R7 was ever incontinent due to not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure clinical staff posting was accurately completed for several days in December 2025 and January 2026, resulting in the inability for residents and visitors to know which clinical staff were working on those days.Findings Include: On 1/6/2026 at 11:40 AM, a daily posted nurse staffing sheet (a document listing all nurse staff by discipline (RN, LPN or Nurse aide working in the building on each shift- posted per federal guidelines), titled Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Patient Care, for 1/6/2026 with a Census of 78 residents was observed posted on the wall in the hallway near the front entryway desk. There were no hours for an RN/Registered Nurse working that day. On 1/6/2026 at 11:45 AM, the Director of Nursing was asked about the posted nurse staffing form for that day, as it was incomplete with no RN hours and she said there was a new scheduler and she would have it fixed. On 1/6/2026 at 1:30 PM Staff Scheduler E was interviewed about the postings, when she provided the schedule book…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to one resident (Resident #6), of one resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Findings Include:Resident #6:On 1/5/26 at 11:21 AM, an observation was made of Resident #6 (R6) lying on her back in bed, dressed in a gown, lights on and R6 was awake. The call light was hanging on a piece of plastic on the wall, in line with the Resident's feet and not in reach for the Resident with the push mechanism hanging below bed frame. The Resident was asked questions, answered them, but did not engage in conversation. The Resident pulled the covers up around her shoulders. An observation was made of long fingernails. The Resident reported she didn't want to answer questions and turned herself facing the wall. The Resident was left alone. On 1/6/26 at 3:45 PM, an observation was made of R6 lying in bed, awake and dressed in a gown. An observation was made of the Resident's fingernails that were long except for one that was irregular and down to the skin on the 5th right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #25), with a significant weight loss, was weighed as ordered by the practitioner and the weights were documented in the medical record of two residents reviewed for nutritional status. Findings include:Resident #25:On 1/6/26 AM, an observation was made of Resident #25 sitting up in the room and staff were providing care. After care was completed, an interview was conducted with the Resident who could express simple answers to questions but did not converse in conversation. Resident #25 denied issues with the food he received at the facility. The Resident had been sick with Covid and indicated he was feeling better. The Resident was observed to not have any cough or congestion and denied any pain in his throat. The Resident continued under isolation precautions. A review of Resident #25 (R25) medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 1/22/25 with diagnoses that included cerebral ischemia, dementia, depressive disorder, and Covid-19. A review of the Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that call lights were answered timely, with dignity, were within reach and needs were met timely, 2) Failed to provide assistance with feeding in a dignified manner, 3) Failed to ensure that food was a palatable temperature, offered substitution of meal items, and ensure the opportunity to eat in the dining room, and 4) Failed to ensure that residents could go outside for a confidential group of residents and Residents (#3, #15, #16, #29, #37, #44 and #64), resulting in complaints of frustration, unhappiness, delayed care with a likelihood of overall decreased quality of life. Findings include: On 10/28/24, at 2:00 PM, During the Resident Council task, the following complaints were voiced regarding not have healthy snacks and food choices: No fresh greens no fresh veggies no fresh fruit I dream about a beautiful red fresh tomato I would love a fresh ear of corn the meals are food of carbs if you want to gain wait, just eat the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and home like environment to ensure that residents' rooms, were clean, uncluttered, and in good repair, resulting in an unhomelike physical environment, with electric razors plugged in and resting over the back of toilets, chairs in disrepair and residents' rooms with drywall gouges and holes in the walls. Findings Include: FACILITY Environment On 10/27/2024 at 12:35 PM, Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have large gouges and holes in the wall. When a Confidential Resident was asked about the damaged wall, the resident stated, They were going to fix it and didn't. I've been here since the beginning of the year. The gouged and open areas were near the head of the bed behind the chair and on the other side of the room on the opposite wall. On 10/27/24, at 11:22 AM, an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted. There was an approximate 1-foot square of chipped drywall. On 10/27/24, at 11:40 AM, An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of care were followed during medication administration of nebulizer treatment for one resident (Resident #82) and supervision of medication administration for one resident (Resident #50), of seven residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in Resident #82 not observed during the administration of nebulizer medication, a lack of getting the prescribed amount of nebulizer medication, and the likelihood of medication not administered as prescribed/scheduled for Resident #50 and the exacerbation of medical conditions, Findings include: Resident #82: On 10/29/24 at 8:42 AM, the Medication Administration task of the survey was started. The following were observed: -At 9:42 AM, Nurse T was observed to prepare Resident #82's medications by removing the pills from the blister packets. Nurse S was observed to prepare the insulin. Nurse S uncapped the needle of the syringe, inserted the needle into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available for a timely and adequate resident care for eight residents (R29, R38, R41, R61, R64, R80, R138, and Resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]B), of eight residents reviewed for adequate staffing resulting in long call light responses, unmet resident care needs, and late medication administration. Findings include: On 10/28/24 at 3:30 PM, a record review of Daily Staffing Assignment from 10/21/24 to 10/28/24 was reviewed with the staffing coordinator. Although there were daily call ins by staff, records and punch cards revealed that there was minimal staff assigned to each of the units because staff go through mandation or by volunteer for staffing coverages. For example, while accounting for staffing schedule per units, there was a daily trend of nurses filling some of the staffing shortages seen on days where there were call ins for license nurses. Some nurses work full their full shift (12.0 hours)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% when 23 medication errors were observed for four residents (#35, #75, #78 and #82) from a total of 69 opportunities, of seven residents observed for medication administration, resulting in an error rate of 33.33% with the potential for adverse reactions related to the omission of medications and medications not administered timely with the potential of ineffective medication therapy and the exacerbation of medical conditions. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 8:42 AM, the Medication Administration task of the survey was started. The following were observed: Resident #82: -At 9:42 AM, Nurse T was observed to prepare Resident #82's medications by removing the pills from the blister packets. Nurse S was observed to prepare the insulin. Nurse S uncapped the needle of the syringe, inserted the needle into the insulin vial, extracted the insulin and when completed with getting the amount needed from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that ongoing surveillance for signs and symptoms of infectious illnesses in residents was collected, documented, analyzed and reported and 2) Failed to ensure that Transmission-Based Precautions were identified and Personal Protective Equipment/PPE was worn when indicated, hand hygiene was performed, when necessary, needles were not recapped, personal items were labeled with residents' names in shared bathrooms, and hair nets were readily accessible without risk of cross-contamination in the kitchen, resulting in a lack of compliance with infection prevention and control standards of practice which could result in exposure to infectious organisms and an outbreak of illnesses. Findings Include: FACILITY Infection Control On 10/29/24 10:10 AM, during an interview with Infection Prevention and Control/IPC Nurse A she said she began the IPC role in June 2024. Reviewed with the IPC Nurse on 10/27/2024 at 1:09 PM, a Contact Precaution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow up on advanced directives with the proper POA signature of DNR consent and ensure that the care planning matches the desired code status for 2 residents (Resident #47 and Resident #71) of 2 residents reviewed for code status resulting in lack of accurate assessment and documentation of code status and the potential for a resident to receive life-sustaining medical treatment against their wishes. Findings include: Resident #47(R47): Advance Directives According to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reviewed on [DATE] at 3:30 PM, R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, General Muscle Weakness and the need for assistance with personal care in addition to other diagnoses. According to the face sheet, R47's daughter is the established Power of Attorney (POA). R47's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score is 0/15. A 0-7 score indicates that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive revised care plans for four residents (#26, #47, #53 and #68) out of five residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in unassisted unsafe ambulation, unassessed nutritional needs with the likelihood of unmet care needs and code status and the potential for a resident to receive life-sustaining medical treatment against their wishes. Findings include: Resident #26: On [DATE], at 9:24 AM, Resident #26 ambulated from the bathroom to their bed. Resident #26 was not assisted, was not wearing shoes and was not using any Assistive device. Resident #26 leaned forward and grabbed the foot of the bed. They used the bed for support to ambulate around to the right side of the bed where they sat down. On [DATE], at 11:04 AM, a record review of Resident #26's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes, History of falling, legally blind and Urostomy. Resident #26 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for two residents (Resident #23, Resident #74) of 18 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in soiled hands, unkempt appearance, and a lack of showering/bathing. Findings include. Resident #74: On 10/29/24, at 10:51 AM, Resident #74 was in their room. They had a large amount of brown residue to their right-hand nails and nail beds. On 10/29/24, at 2:26 PM, an observation along with CNA E was conducted of Resident #74's nails. CNA E observed the brown residue and offered, oh yeah it didn't get done. CNA E shortly returned into Resident #74's room with supplies to provide nail care. A review of Resident #74's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Heart Failure and kidney disease. Resident #74 had severely impaired cognition and required assistance with all ADL's including PERSONAL HYGIENE: Resident (requires one assist Date Initiated:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ambulation supervision and ensure that a safety care plan was followed for two residents (Resident #71 and Resident #38) at risk for falls, and prevent/assess/document an injury from furniture in disrepair for one resident (Resident #68), of 4 residents reviewed for falls and safety, resulting in the potential for serious harm or injury from a fall and a delay in treatment for R#68's forearm cut from a sharp edge of broken furniture. Findings include: Resident #38 (R38): Accidents During the observation tour conducted at the 200 Hall on 10/27/24 at 1:00 PM, R38 got out of bed and was observed walking with an unsteady gait out in the hallway. The staff was busy and not in sight because they were attending to another resident in the other room. The surveyor called for the nursing assistant's (CNA F) attention, and CNA F immediately took R38 back to her room. CNA F confirmed that R38 needed supervision when ambulating and will need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that urostomy appliance changes were ordered timely, completed per physicians' orders, and there was a completion of a comprehensive bladder elimination care plan and 2) Failed to obtain a physician's order for a urinary indwelling catheter for two residents (Resident #23, Resident #26), resulting in delayed and missed urostomy appliance changes, unmet care needs with the likelihood of further missed care needs, infection and complications from an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Resident #26: On 10/28/24, at 11:04 AM, a record review of Resident #26's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes, History of falling, legally blind and Urostomy. Resident #26 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. A review of the TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION RECORD 6/1/2024-6/30/2024 revealed no ostomy appliance changes from admission on [DATE] through the end of the month.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor and ensure that interventions were enacted to promote nutrition and prevent weight loss for one resident (Resident #139) of 5 residents reviewed for food or nutrition, resulting in Resident #139 lacking nutritional assessments to aid in the identification of nutritional needs. Findings Include: Resident #139: Nutrition On 10/27/2024 at 2:38 PM, Resident #139 was heard yelling out and moaning. He was observed sitting in bed with his lunch tray at the bedside. The lid was on it and the resident said he did not feel like eating. He said after a while they would take his meal tray. He said he wished they wouldn't take it. A record review of the Face sheet and medical record indicated Resident #139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: acute respiratory failure, COPD, metabolic encephalopathy, weakness, need for assistance with personal care, diabetes, end stage kidney disease, acute kidney failure, need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that orders from the dialysis center were communicated to the practitioner for 2 residents (Resident #23 and Resident #139) of two residents reviewed for dialysis care, resulting in the potential for missed medication regimen, treatment and complications of dialysis care. Resident #23: A review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 8/3/24 with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, obesity, and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed the Resident had intact cognition and needed substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe self. On 10/27/24 at 1:31 PM, an observation was made of Resident #23 sitting in her recliner chair and was dressed. The Resident was interviewed, answered questions and engaged in conversation. The Resident was asked about dialysis and reported she went to dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that narcotic medication reconciliation was completed, 2) Failed to ensure that residents received medications timely, and 3) Failed to ensure that the medication administration standards of practice were followed for four residents (#34, #75, #78 and #82) of seven residents observed for medication administration, resulting in medications not given as scheduled with the likelihood of ineffective medication therapy, exacerbation of medical conditions, medication/narcotic diversion, and medication administration errors. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 8:42 AM, the Medication Administration task of the survey was started. The following were observed: -At 9:42 AM, Nurse T was observed to prepare Resident #82's medications by removing the pills from the blister packets. Nurse S was observed to prepare the insulin. Nurse S uncapped the needle of the syringe, inserted the needle into the insulin vial, extracted the insulin and when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enough healthy snack choices for all residents, resulting in Resident Council-voiced complaints, missing and low snack list items, and feelings of decreased over all well-being and frustration. Findings include: On 10/28/24, at 2:00 PM, During resident council task, the following complaints were voiced regarding not have healthy snacks and food choices: No fresh greens no fresh veggies no fresh fruit I dream about a beautiful red fresh tomato I would love a fresh ear of corn the meals are food of carbs if you want to gain wait, just eat the processed foods here you get the same thing for breakfast every day we want fresh cinnamon rolls the little butter packets are margarine we want real butter we don't want imitation cheese they run out of snacks they run out of honey buns you have to ask the CNA's for night time snacks and they say there isn't any The CNA's say they will go check for a snack but then they don't come back You have to go to the kitchen sometimes to get snacks you have to know who to go…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure: that sound levels of call lights were appropriate for the resident population in the 200 Hall and 2) Failed to ensure dignity in regard to call lights by not responding timely for two residents (Resident # 66 Resident #76), resulting in residents verbalizing complaints of lack of response, frustration, agitation, and the likelihood for behaviors. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Guest/Resident Rights' policy, dated 5/1/2022, revealed that the facility protects and promotes the rights of each guest/resident. The guest/resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside of the facility. Record review of the facility 'Call Lights' policy, dated 2/15/2022, revealed that call lights will be placed within the resident reach and answered in a timely manner. Respond to the call light. Identify the location and answer the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #41: On [DATE] at 12:40 PM, a review was conducted of Resident #41's medical records and it revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease, Bacteremia, Cellulitis, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Disease and Presence of Automatic Cardiac Defibrillator. Further review of Resident #41's record yielded the following results: Hospital Discharge Records: .AICD (automatic cardioverter/defibrillator) present . Facility admission Assessment [DATE]: - Pacemaker: Yes Care Plan: Focus: (Resident #41) is at risk for cardiac complications r/t multiple cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, CAD, hx of STEMI and presence of AICD. Progress Notes: [DATE] at 00:00: Notified by nursing the resident will be transferred to the hospital due to sternal abscess which has copious drainage. [DATE] at 06:34: Seeping serosangauness fluid from chest midline. There was no other documentation located from initial progress note on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00135049 and MI00135826. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that there was adequate staff and/or that staff were utilized appropriately to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and answer call lights timely, resulting in delays in incontinence care, increased call light response times of 30 minutes or more and other unmet care needs. Findings Include: During initial tour on 10/4/202, Resident #79 expressed complaints related to the facility's call light response times. Resident #79 shared sometimes facility staff complete check and changes and other times they do not. She stated she has not been changed since 5 AM and had urinated multiple times since then but no one had been in to check on her. This writer pressed Resident #79's call light at 11:15 AM and verified it had been activated on the call light box affixed to the wall. At 11:53 AM (43 minutes later) a CNA responded to the call light. The CNA was queried if it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure: that ice machines in the 200, 400 and 900 halls were clean and sanitary and 2) Failed to ensure that the salad bar cabinet did not have standing water underneath and that items were not stored under the cabinet , resulting in the potential for the spread of foodborne illness to all residents receiving meal service from a census of 81 residents. Findings Include: FACILITY Kitchen On 10/04/23 at 10:25 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager/CDM H and Kitchen Supervisor M, the salad bar cabinet in the main dining room was observed to have standing water underneath and inside the cabinet. A 5 gallon bucket was under the drain in the upper compartment of the cabinet. There were doors on the lower level of the cabinet and there were card board boxes with kitchen utensils stored inside it. The cardboard boxes were wet, and smelled like mold. The CDM removed all of the boxes and said she would have the water removed and no additional items would be stored under the cabinet. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00135826 and MI00138777. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that infection control standards of practice were followed for: 1) Collection, analysis and reporting of infection surveillance data, 2) Multiple residents having a rash of unknown origin on the 200 Hall, and 3) Hand hygiene practices, resulting in the potential for resident, staff and visitor exposure to infectious illness. Findings Include: FACILITY Infection Control: Resident #56: On [DATE] at 1:29 PM, during a tour of the facility, Resident #56 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the 200 hallway and stated, They are battling people that are itching here. I'll go out in the hall and you'll see people just scratching. They don't know what it is. I think some have it bad. Across the hall (Resident #65) has it terrible; he's constantly scratching. Resident #56 showed that he had 3 red raised dots on his left inner arm and said he told the doctor and showed him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update a care plan for catheterization for one resident (Resident #80), resulting in the catheter interventions not addressing the resident's self-catheterization and accompanying education, which was to be provided per physician's order. Findings include: The State Surveyor's request for the facility's 'Resident Self-catheterization' policy on 10/6/2023 at 7:30 AM from the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the facility did not have a policy. Later that same day, 10/6/2023 at 9:03 AM, the DON e-mailed the surveyor a Lippincott procedure guideline. Record review of the facility 'Care Planning' policy, dated 06/24/2021, revealed that every resident in the facility will have a person-centered plan of care developed and implemented that is consistent with the resident's rights, based on the comprehensive assessment that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to educate and provide proper management of self-catheterization for one resident (Resident #80), resulting in the potential for bladder injury, cross contamination, and resultant urinary tract infection. Findings include: The State Surveyor requested facility's 'Self-catheterization' policy on 10/6/2023 at 7:30 AM from the Director of Nursing (DON) The DON revealed that the facility did not have a policy. Later that same day, 10/6/2023 at 9:03 AM, the DON e-mailed the State Surveyor a Lippincott procedure guideline. Record review was conducted of the facility-provided [NAME] 'Intermittent (straight) urinary catheter insertion, assigned male at birth' procedure (https://procedures.lww.com/lpn/view.do?pld=1670271&hits=cathers&a=true&ad=false&q=cather) link. Record review of pages 1 through 4 (revised 11/28/2022) revealed that the procedure guide revealed that intermittent urinary catheterization can be long-term or short-term depending on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate completion of a trauma assessment for one trauma survivor, Resident #9, resulting in the facility not being aware of Resident #9's trauma history and subsequently not being able to deliver culturally competent trauma-informed care and identify triggers to minimize re-traumatization. Findings Include: Resident #9: On 10/4/2023 at approximately 2:30 PM, Resident #9 was observed resting in bed and was in a pleasant mood. The survey system indicated Resident #9 triggered for PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and she was queried if this was accurate, and she responded it was. The resident was asked if she was comfortable sharing a generalized statement regarding her trauma (type of trauma and if in childhood or adulthood). Resident #9 stated her trauma stemmed from a 25 year physically abusive marriage. A quick review was conducted of the most recent Social Work Assessment from 7/2023 and it showed Resident #9 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have two nurses sign off on a Fentanyl patch removal and administration for one resident (Resident #3), resulting in the likelihood of narcotic diversion and the narcotic diversion going unnoticed. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Controlled Substances (MI, OH, IN, and VA) policy, dated [DATE], revealed it shall be the policy of the facility to store and/or destroy all discontinued or expired controlled substances, in accordance with legal and regulatory requirements. Destruction of Controlled Substances: (1.) The Director of Nursing/designee and another nurse must destroy all discontinued and/or expired controlled substances ideally upon receipt. A Registered Nurse must always be present when controlled substances are destroyed . (5. C) With the Director of Nursing/RN designee and licensed nurse present the wasting of leftover, unadministered partial doses of controlled substances, like a dose that remains in a vial,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that 1 of 3 medication carts were free from loose tablets/medications and 2) Failed to perform hand hygiene during medication pass, resulting in the likelihood of cross contamination and ineffective medications. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Medication Administration' policy, dated 10/14/2022, revealed that guest/resident medications are administered in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manor. Procedure: 1. (c.) Place medication into a souffle cup or medicine cup without touching the inside of the cup. (a.) If medications come into contact with bare hands of nurse, med tech, or with the cart, the medication should be disposed of per policy . An observation and interview on 10/05/23 at 06:32 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) E night shift nurse till 7:30 AM revealed RNE to come from another resident room, open medication cart and begin to finger through the medications of Resident #58. RN E gathered her blood pressure checking supplies and went into Resident #58's room and touched…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/1999 |
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/1999 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/20/2025 |
| MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97 | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/1999 |
| CHAMBERS, TINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/22/2019 |
| SHISLER, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235456. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.