No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Christian Park Health Care Center

2415 5th Avenue South, Escanaba, MI 49829 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (906) 786-6907 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse6 actual-harm citations$36,651 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 6 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (27) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,651 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-29)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
610 S Lincoln Rd · (906) 786-6488 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2500 7th Ave S · (906) 384-5900 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2307 1st Ave S · (906) 786-2320 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1110 30th St S · (906) 786-9402 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
600 S Lincoln Rd · (906) 786-6771

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.1%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.3%4.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.3%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.4%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.6%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.8%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.4%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.7%24.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.6%11.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.641.841.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.101.641.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.2%CMS range 33.5–60.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.8–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge30.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.701.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
54.5%
Total nursing turnover
46.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 79.5 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · H2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a complete infection control program as evidenced by failure to:Effectively mitigate outbreaks of COVID-19 and Influenza A resulting in widespread dissemination of infection disease throughout the facility.Properly disinfect and store multiple-resident use glucometers and individual insulin pens following use.Maintain clean and sanitary medication carts, andProperly clean and sanitize resident bed pans for 5 of the 5 residents in the facility that use bed pans.This deficient practice resulted in the harm when COVID-19 and Influenza A outbreaks in January and February 2026, respectively, spread throughout all Halls of the facility, infecting 25 Residents with one death for COVID-19, infecting 10 Residents with one death for Influenza A, and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1. Outbreak Mitigation Failure/Infection Control Surveillance and Tracking/Timely Implementation of Contact Precautions. During an interview on 4/8/2026 at 11:00 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) U, was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from willful neglect in answering a call light for one Resident (8) of 4 residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #8 waiting for over 20 minutes to be addressed while moaning, crying out and thrashing. Based on the reasonable person concept Resident #8 exhibited signs and symptoms of extreme pain and overwhelming anxiety caused by this extended time of unmet needs.Findings include: Review of a facility Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 10/14/2022 read in part: Policy-Each guest/resident shall be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. To assure guests/residents are free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility shall monitor guest/resident care and treatments on an on-going basis. It is the responsibility of all staff to provide a safe environment for the guests/residents. Allegations of guest/resident abuse, exploitation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-04-09 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint # 2972928.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely readmit one Resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for admission, transfer, and discharge rights, resulting in Resident #1 feeling of unnecessary separation from family and friends and uncertainty related to continued medical care and financial stress, as well as psychological stress and anxiety.Findings include:Resident (R1)Review of an admission Record revealed R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: respiratory failure.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R1 dated 2/12/2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 indicating R1 was cognitively intact.Review of R1's EMR read in part: Date of Service 3/19/2026 14:16 Behavioral Health Visit Type Psychiatry Follow up - His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 14.Review of a State Agency Complaint dated 4/2/2026 at 1:51 PM., read in part:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2674136Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement preventative measures, promptly assess and treat constipation for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care and prevent further medical complications from constipation. This failure resulted in actual harm when R1was hospitalized for a small bowel obstruction, leading to acute kidney injury and sepsis.Findings include:According to Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 4th Edition, ([NAME], G, 2006), a major responsibility of all health care providers is that they keep accurate and complete medical records. From a nursing perspective, the most important purpose of documentation is communication. The standards for record keeping attempt to ensure patient identification, medical support for the selected diagnoses, justification of the medical therapies used, accurate documentation of that which has transpired, and preservation of the record for a reasonable time-period.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent wound infection for two Residents (R57 & R71), out of four residents reviewed for pressure injuries. This deficient practice resulted in harm with delay and/or removal of recommended pressure relieving mattresses, delayed healing, and worsening of condition with the development of osteomyelitis for R71. Findings include: This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00140165. Resident R71 During a telephone interview on 2/22/24 at 4:19 p.m., Confidential Complainant C (a licensed, medical professional) expressed concern regarding the facilities failure to timely implement pressure injury interventions to promote healing. Complainant C stated, What the (specialty) wound clinic had ordered the facility has not implemented (timely) . [R71] went septic (extreme response to an infection) and was diagnosed with osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection) . I don't think [R71] would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is linked to intake #MI00139805 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to care for multiple pressure wounds according to physician orders for three Residents (R4, R5, & R6) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. This deficient practice resulted in R6 developing infection, deterioration of pressure wound, hospitalization, wound debridement, and sepsis. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) Review of R6's progress note, dated 7/12/23 at 10:46 AM, read in part, Nursing noticed during morning medication pass that patient was difficult to arouse. Resident will fall asleep suddenly during conversation . (Providers name) notified of patient's current condition. Advised to continue to monitor. Review of R6's progress note, dated 7/12/23 at 12:01 PM, read in part, .Writer in to assess, will only arouse with deep sternal rub, very weak and lethargic .New orders obtained for x-ray of coccyx to rule out osteomyelitis . Review of R6's progress note, dated 7/12/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to complaint intake #3010662.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the state agency of a resident-to-resident altercation to the State Agency (SA) for two Residents (#1 and #5) of five residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1)Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 1/14/26. R1 scored 15/15 on the Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition.Resident #5 (R5)Review of MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on [DATE]. R5 scored 15 of 15 on the BIMS assessment reflective of intact cognition.During a phone interview on 5/28/26 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) E reported, On the evening of May 1st I was charting on the hallway where I was working and [R1] had entered the room where [R5] was receiving personal care from another CNA and opened the privacy curtain and exposed the resident.During an interview on 5/28/26 at 2:20 p.m., the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 4/6/2026 at 1:17 PM observed the large stand mixer covered with a plastic bag. DM A was asked why the bag was covering the mixer and they stated that the bag meant that the mixer had been cleaned and covered to show that it was ready to use again. The covering was removed and food debris was noted on the protective wire bowl guard and on the underneath splash zone area where the beater is attached to the unit.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be clean to sight and touch. On 4/7/2026 at 10:04 AM observed upon opening the door to the exterior walk-in freezer that the stainless-steel covering on the interior of the door is completely missing and the foam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general repair of patient equipment and the premises resulting in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living affecting all residents of the facility. Findings Include:On 4/7/2026 at 8:25 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed A, observed that the headboard was broken away from the bed and sitting askew with the left corner of the headboard sitting on the floor. During this observation, resident 1 stated that they had requested this be repaired three to four months ago and nothing had been done yet. On 4/7/2026 at 09:29 AM observed duct tape on the handle of the hopper water hose that is used to rinse out soiled linens. During this observation, Maintenance Director (MD) E stated that the duct tape was to give the handle some traction so it would hang in the bracket above the bowl without falling out. On 4/7/2026 at 10:04 observed peeling sealant on exterior soffits on the two hundred wing and just to the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were addressed by the physician in a timely manner and maintained in the clinical record for three Residents (#5, #45, and #52) of five residents reviewed for MRRs.Findings include:Resident #45 (R45) Review of R45's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/25/25, revealed R45 was admitted on [DATE] with active diagnoses that included the following, in part: Non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and restlessness and agitation, Resident R45 scored a 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition, with no documented behaviors. Medications administered upon admission included an antipsychotic and antidepressant. Review of R45's MRR Recommendations (to Physician), provided by the facility, revealed the following, in part: Review of R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed MRR documentation was not present or not addressed by the physician for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive information was in place for one Resident (7) of two residents reviewed for accuracy of advanced directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time).Findings include:According to Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing, 4th Edition, ([NAME], G, 2006), a major responsibility of all health care providers is that they keep accurate and complete medical records. From a nursing perspective, the most important purpose of documentation is communication. The standards for record keeping attempt to ensure patient identification, medical support for the selected diagnoses, justification of the medical therapies used, accurate documentation of that which has transpired, and preservation of the record for a reasonable time period. Documentation must show continuity of care, interventions used, and patient responses. Nurses' notes are to be concise, clear, timely, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure unnecessary psychotropic medications were not administered for an extended duration and without appropriate indications for use for 2 Residents (R45 & R59) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications/chemical restraints. This deficient practice resulted in administration of antipsychotic medications for an extended duration, administration of antipsychotic medication without appropriate diagnoses for use, and lack of timely gradual dose reductions (GDRs). Findings include:Resident R45Review of R45's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/25/25, revealed R45 was admitted on [DATE] with active diagnoses that included the following, in part: Non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, Resident R45 scored a 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition, with no documented behaviors. Medications administered upon admission included an antipsychotic and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement its Abuse Program Policy and Procedure and immediately protect other this and other residents from neglect, for 1 Resident (#8) from 4 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for continued resident abuse/neglect. Findings include:Review of a facility Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 10/14/2022 read in part: Policy-Each guest/resident shall be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. To assure guests/residents are free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. Allegations of guest/resident abuse, exploitation, neglect, misappropriation of property, adverse event, or mistreatment shall be thoroughly investigated and documented by the Administrator and reported to the appropriate state agencies.Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a guest/resident that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to investigate a report of neglect for 1 Resident (#8) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect, resulting in the potential for continued abuse and/or neglect of residents residing in the facility to go unrecognized.Findings include:Review of a facility Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 10/14/2022 read in part: Policy-Each guest/resident shall be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. To assure guests/residents are free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. Allegations of guest/resident abuse, exploitation, neglect, misappropriation of property, adverse event, or mistreatment shall be thoroughly investigated and documented by the Administrator and reported to the appropriate state agencies.Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a guest/resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Complaint # 2972928.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully implement their policy and procedure and provide applicable bed hold policy information, written transfer notifications, and required hospital documents for 1 (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for hospitalizations resulting in worry, fear and frustration for R1 and the delay in his re-admission from a lengthy out of state hospitalization.Findings include:Resident (R1)Review of an admission Record revealed R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: respiratory failure.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R1 with a reference date of 2/12/2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 which indicated R1 was cognitively intact.Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) read in part: 3/26/2026 19:19 . (R1) No BM (bowel movement) For 3 Days Sent to (Local emergency department-name omitted) .During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a PASARR (Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review) prior to admission for one Resident (#3) of two residents reviewed for PASARR screening.Findings include:Resident #3 (R3)Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. R3 scored 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition.Review of R3's Electron Medical Record (EMR) revealed a PASARR was not completed until 2/21/26.During an interview on 4/7/26 at 2:22 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) reported, PASARR's are completed when the residents are admitted to the facility. The DON acknowledged the PASARR had not been completed upon admission.During an interview on 4/8/26 at 2:42 p.m., the DON and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) acknowledged the concern regarding PASARR's not being completed and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
Show the remaining 11 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen services per standards of practice for two Residents (#65 & #83) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care.Findings include: Resident #83 (R83) Review of R83's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 5/19/25, with diagnoses that included respiratory failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructive airflow from the lungs, making breathing difficult). R 83 scored a 00/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment reflective of severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders revealed R83 to be administered oxygen at 4L/min (liters per minute) via nasal cannula for SOB [shortness of breath]. Review of R83's care plan last revised 3/30/26, read in part . R83 to have supplemental O2 [oxygen] 4L as ordered. During an observation on 4/7/26 at 8:49 a.m., R83 sat in a wheelchair in the dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident medications were securely stored in locked compartments for all Residents residing on the 200 Hall. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for tampering and/or diversion of resident medication. Findings include:During an observation on 4/7/26 at 5:05 p.m., the 200 Hall medication cart, staffed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) R, was observed unlocked, facing outward into the hall, as LPN R entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. Dietary Manager (DM) A was present near the nurse's station and was motioned to the 200 Hall medication cart by this Surveyor. The 200 Hall medication cart verified as unlocked, when it was opened in front of DM A. DM A stated, That is not good. The 200 Hall medication cart was then closed awaiting the return of LPN R. Following exit from room [ROOM NUMBER], when asked if it was acceptable to have the medication cart unlocked and unsupervised, LPN R stated, Absolutely not. During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2674136Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to implement, review and revise care plans and interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for quality of care resulting in delay in treatment for constipation, development of a small bowel obstruction, and hospitalization.Findings include:Resident #1 (R1)Review of the Face Sheet revealed R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R1 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively impaired. Section H Bowl and Bladder on the MDS assessment revealed: R1 was always continent of bowel movements.Review of a facility Communication Document from a facility nurse to a facility Physician dated 4/2/25 read in part: Concern: (R1) is constantly on the BM (Bowel Movement) list for not having a BM every 3 days .Review of R1's Care Plan read in part: FOCUS (R1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00150692 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident with dignity and respect and failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident quality of life and individuality for 1 Resident (#1) of 4 residents reviewed for dignity and resident rights, resulting in R1 having increased anxiety, and feelings of frustration. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of an admission Record for R1 revealed an original admission to the facility on 5/4/2021 with diagnoses including paraplegia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R1, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/6/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. Section D Mood of the assessment revealed R1 was Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless. for 2-6 days during the seven day look back period. Section E Behavior revealed no significant behaviors. Review of R1's [NAME] (CNA care guide)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00147097 and MI00147132. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure residents received food as prescribed by a physician and in accordance with preferences for three residents (R12, R13, and R15) of four residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. This deficient practice resulted in a potential for choking and the potential for health complications. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 12:33 PM, the meal tray for R13 was observed. The lunch tray contained a tray card indicating no bread unless its a sandwich. The meal included manicotti, green beans and a dinner roll. After the meal was completed, the tray was returned to the food cart with the roll still contained in the protective baggie and was unopened and untouched. During an interview on 10/16/24 at 8:25 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) D stated Sometimes bread is on his tray so he can have a sandwich - but with manicotti - no bread should have been on the tray per his request. On 10/15/24 at 5:17 PM, R12 was observed in her room trying to cut a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient numbers of staff to provide adequate care to the resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unmet care needs and the provision of inadequate care for all 70 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 2/26/24 at 12:47 p.m., R17 was observed lying in bed with a meal tray of untouched food on the over bed table. R17 said call lights are not answered timely. R17 said There could be more people around here! R17 said the usual wait for call light response was between 30 to 45 minutes. R17 resided on the 500 unit. On 2/27/24 at 8:40 a.m., Resident #17 (R17) was observed in bed with an untouched plate of scrambled eggs, sausage, and toast on the over bed table. R17 was lying flat in bed and had slid down toward the foot of the bed. R17 said he was hungry and couldn't reach his food. R17 asked the surveyor for help. The surveyor conveyed R17's request for assistance to Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G who was asked the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to properly clean areas with a potential to contaminate food during preparation. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food borne illness among any or all 70 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 2/26/24 at 11:33 AM, a tour of the facility dietary department with was made with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) Q. The oven area hood and exhaust systems were observed to be covered with thick dust clinging to the ventilation filters directly over the range cooking area. The covered lights and spigots in this area had dangling web-like dust strings also hanging directly over the cooking area. Both hood and hood lights were directly over the area where open pans of food were prepared. CDM Q observed the area and said, This could cause food born illness. It's unsanitary. CDM Q indicated the hood system had been last cleaned August 2023. On 0/29/24 at 11:23 AM, the cleaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a correct therapeutic diet was served as prescribed for four residents (R59, R29, R275, and R66) of 20 residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for health complications. Findings include: During a meal observation on 2/26/24 at 12:11 PM, meal trays were being passed on the 500 hall. The meal card for Resident #59 (R59) indicated his diet order was Level 3 Adv/Mech (Mechanical) Soft, Regular. R59's meal was observed and included a large slice of roast beef. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) for R59 included Physician diet orders of: Regular diet, Level 3 Advanced (Mechanical Soft) texture, Thin consistency. No lettuce to start on 5/11/2023. The Dietary Policy with Menu and Diet Guidelines included a section which read in part, Mechanical Soft Diet Purpose: The mechanical diet is modified in consistency to reduce the amount of chewing required to consume food . Include foods from Soft Diet but chop or grind meats. The guidance on mechanical soft food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate positioning during meals for two Residents (R17 & R57) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: Resident #17 Resident #17 (R17) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) examination was completed on 1/24/24 and identified R17 as being cognitively intact. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed R17 as requiring maximal assistance from staff for turning and repositioning in bed. The MDS coded R17 as unable to independently perform the task of moving from a lying to a sitting position. R17 was assessed as requiring set-up assistance from staff for eating. R17's care plans identified the resident as being at-risk for nutritional decline. An intervention on the care plan read Provide feeding/dining assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize, address, and provide the fluid requirements as ordered by the physician for one dialysis resident reviewed for fluid needs (Resident #43). This deficient practice resulted in the potential for fluid overload and medical complications. Findings include: On 02/27/24 at 2:10 PM, R43 reported she was No longer on a fluid restriction. R43's bedside table had the following beverages: - one 16 oz (ounce) styrofoam container with ice water dated 2/27 - two 16 oz styrofoam containers with cola colored fluid - one 12 oz cola bottle with only a few drops remaining and on R43's side table there was a 20 oz cola which was approximately 2/3 full. R43 stated her family brought in pop for her. (The total of the fluid containers was 80 oz or 2400 cc [cubic centimeters] of fluid.) R43 stated she went to dialysis three times a week. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R43 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe resident self-administration of medication for one Resident (R41), of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications This deficient practice resulted in the potential for improper medication administration for R41. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 2/27/24 at 8:41 a.m., R41 was asked what she was doing with the Total Parental Nutrition (TPN) while reclining in bed. R41 stated, I am removing my TPN. I don't handle all of the care myself. R41 was observed with two syringes filled with clear liquid and was asked for the purpose of the syringes. R41 stated, I flush it (TPN port) with saline and then the heparin flush. Then I clamp it and put a cap on it. The nurse just brought it (syringes to flush with saline and heparin) in to me (to self-administer). Review of R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/20/2023, revealed R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with active diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,651 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $36,651 — penalty dated 2024-02-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH 3 of 5Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDetroit, MI

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KHAN, ANISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/02/2004
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/02/2004
CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025
BOND, MARYANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
IRISH, COLINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CHRISTIAN PARK LAND COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/02/2004
MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/02/2004

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense18% of expenses

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$327per resident / day
operating cost
$9,951per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$296per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235244. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next