Willowbrook Manor
G-4436 Beecher Road, Flint, MI 48532 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (810) 733-0290 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $89,021 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-23)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.6% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.3% | 12.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.4% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.1% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.9% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.2% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.6% | 11.7% | 12.0% | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 31.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.9%CMS range 47.5–64.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 9.0–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 31.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 89.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.6–10.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 110.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to intake MI00138800. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for pressure ulcer (wounds caused by pressure) prevention and management for two residents (Resident #704 and Resident #710) of two residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of implementation and documentation of meaningful, resident-centered interventions for pressure ulcer prevention, the development and worsening of facility-acquired pressure ulcers, unnecessary pain, and the likelihood for a decline in overall heath status. Findings include: Resident #704: Review of intake documentation dated as received on 8/3/23 revealed concerns related to Resident #704 developing pressure ulcers while at the facility and staff failing to appropriately treat the Resident. Record Review revealed Resident #704 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, heart disease, weakness and cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00141163. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to 1) Monitor blood glucose levels and signs/symptoms of diabetic complications; 2) Recognize a change of condition in a timely manner; 3) Document clinical assessment of a resident during a change in condition and the subsequent measures taken; and 4) Provide documented clinical interventions, care plans and coordination for consistent refusal of all medications since readmission for one resident (Resident #902). This deficient practice resulted in Resident #902 being admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for Diabetic Ketoacidosis (increased ketone levels in the blood) and Acute Kidney Injury (inability of kidneys to filter waste products), inadequate facility documentation related to the resident's change in condition and current refusal of medications that could lead to a diabetic or psychiatric episode. Findings include: Resident #902: On 12/19/2023 at 2:15 PM, an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent facility-acquired pressure ulcers for 2 residents (Resident #42 and Resident #72) and ensure that residents were assessed, monitored, wound care was provided as ordered and appropriate interventions were in place for 3 residents (Resident #42, Resident #72 and Resident #262) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in Resident #42 developing a Stage 2 sacral pressure ulcer, Resident #72 developing multiple Stage 2 pressure ulcers to the sacrum and right trochante,; and Resident #262 developing a sacral pressure ulcer that worsened to a Stage 4. Findings Include: Resident #262: Pressure Ulcer/Injury: On 6/14/23 at 10:36 AM during a tour of the facility, Confidential Person M said the resident had a large pressure ulcer on her bottom. He said it was smaller and then became much larger; he said she now had a wound vac. The Confidential Person pointed to the Wound Vacuum canister in a bag on the bedside table. He said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number 2786215. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings Include: Resident #1: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Diabetes, hypothyroidism, arthritis, Dementia, history of falls, low back pain, hypertension, history of a stroke and urinary tract infection/UTI. The resident discharged to home on 2/27/2026. A review of the progress notes for Resident #1 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 2:45 PM and a provider note by Nurse Practitioner E dated 1/8/2026 listed her medications including: Nitrofurantoin microcrystal, oral capsule 100 mg: Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for UTI for 2 administrations until finished, active 1/7/2026-1/8/2026. A review of the Hospital discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intakes 2713005 and 2717874.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fulfill residents' rights with timely responses to call lights for five Residents (#1, #3, #4, #5, and #6) of six residents reviewed for residents' rights and call light response times. Findings include:Resident 1 (R1):A review of Resident 1's (R1) medical record revealed an admission into the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of intake documentation revealed the Resident had been put on an oxygen tank when the concentrator malfunctioned. The oxygen tank had run out of oxygen, the Resident experienced a developing headache, dizziness, and lightheadedness. The Resident activated his call light and waited approximately 25 minutes before staff responded and then left the room to locate a full tank of oxygen. The incident placed (R1) at serious risk of harm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number 2717874.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physicians' orders for oxygen use were followed for 1 resident (Resident #6),; oxygen was provided to 1 resident (Resident #5); and nebulizer equipment was stored properly for 1supplemental (Resident #7), of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration and one supplemental resident.Findings include:Resident #7:On 2/3/25 at 2:44 PM, an observation was made during the initial tour of the facility of Supplemental Resident #7's room. The Resident was not in the room at the time. The Resident had oxygen equipment set up in the room that included a nebulizer machine. The nebulizer mask and tubing were stored inside a clear bag. The nebulizer medicine chamber was observed to be stored inside the bag wet with drops of liquid inside the chamber.A review of Supplemental Resident #7's Medication Administration Record revealed the Resident had Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation solution,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to intake Number 2659743.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer to the hospital in a timely manner one resident (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for a delay in transfer to the hospital, upon an acute change of condition. Findings Include:On [DATE] at 9:15 AM, EMT (Emergency Medical Technician)/ LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) C shared they were dispatched to the facility around 1:30 AM on [DATE] for a male resident with difficulty breathing, pulse of 150 and unresponsiveness. Upon arrival the nurse informed them she had recently arrived for her shift and per Resident #1's brother he had been in this condition prior to the beginning of her shift. The CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) was sitting at the edge of the resident's bed and shared this was not his baseline and the night prior this was not how Resident #1 presented.EMT/LPN C stated the Resident #1 was unresponsive, diaphoretic and would awaken only to painful stimuli. He was hot to touch with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are treated in a dignified manner by timely call light response by staff and accessible to residents, maintain food palatability for two (2) Residents #58, #21, and a confidential group of residents resulting in residents needs not met, frustration, embarrassment and potential for skin impairment from being left soiled and wet for prolonged periods. Findings include: FACILITY Resident Council FACILITY On June 25, 2025, at 11:00 AM, a Resident Council Meeting was held. According to nine (9) members of a group of confidential residents, on June 25, 2025, at 11:05 AM, the Resident Council meets on the last Friday of every month. They requested to remain anonymous and to keep their identities confidential. One confidential resident stated that the issues brought up by the council do not get resolved and said, It does not go anywhere. It seemed that the concerns were not followed up on. No one gets back at us. The following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide prompt efforts to resolve complaints pertaining to prolonged call light response times, food palatability, bedtime (HS) snack distribution, group activities, and staff availability and attitude to assist and to ensure the process to address grievances was understood for nine (9) confidential group of residents resulting in unresolved grievances and potential for further frustration. Findings include: Resident Council: FACILITY On June 25, 2025, at 11:00 AM, a Resident Council Meeting was held. According to nine (9) members of a group of confidential residents, on June 25, 2025, at 11:00 AM, the Resident Council meets on the last Friday of every month. They requested to remain anonymous and to keep their identities confidential. One confidential resident stated that the issues brought up by the council do not get resolved and said, It does not go anywhere. It seemed that the concerns were not followed up on. No one gets back at us. A confidential group of residents expressed a lack of awareness about the grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a substantial HS (evening) snack was consistently offered and appropriately distributed to a group of confidential residents that attended the Resident Council Meeting, potentially affecting all residents who receive meals in the facility with 14 or more hours between last evening meal and breakfast the following day, resulting in resident dissatisfaction, frustration and potential for uncontrolled blood sugars, signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia, feeling of hunger, and weight loss. Findings include: FACILITY Resident Council: On June 25, 2025, at 11:00 AM, a Resident Council Meeting was held. According to nine (9) members of a group of confidential residents, on June 25, 2025, at 11:00 AM, the Resident Council meets on the last Friday of every month. They requested to remain anonymous and to keep their identities confidential. There were numerous grievances brought up by the confidential group of residents during the meeting held on 6/25/25, from 11:00 AM to 12:05 PM. One of the issues brought up was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen that included: 1.) outdated food in the refrigerator; 2.) maintaining proper temperature of refrigerators and freezers; 3.) proper labelling of food items with a use by date; 4.) ensure dented cans were removed from supply; 5.) ice scooper not placed appropriately at the ice machine; and 6.) ensure the temperature log for refrigerator and freezer were not documented in advance. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who consume food prepared by the facility of a census of 108. Findings include: Kitchen: On 06/24/25 10:05 AM, during Initial tour with the Dietary Manager (CDM) I. The following observations were validated with the Dietary Manager: 1. The walk-in refrigerator temperature was at 40 degrees farenheit as shown in the digital screen. Inside the refrigerator there was a bin containing pre-made sandwiches labeled with used by date and some did not have a label at all. Seven sandwiches were found with use by date that varied from 6/19/25-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #43: Advance Directives A record review was conducted on [DATE] at 10:15 AM. According to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), R43 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the primary diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction, dysphagia Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hemiplegia, and Hemiparesis affecting Right dominant side and vascular dementia in addition to another diagnosis. R43 was enrolled in hospice services and has an appointed guardian. R43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessed on [DATE] revealed that her Brief Interview for Mental Status score is 00/15. A score of zero generally indicates severe cognitive impairment. MDS section GG indicated that R43 was dependent on all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), especially personal hygiene tasks and mobility. A care plan related to dementia revealed that the guardian was in place for all medical and treatment decisions, as R43 is no longer able to follow directions and does not communicate with others. A Care Plan for DNR and Hospice services was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that blood pressure medications were administered as ordered for one resident (#209) of 6 residents reviewed for medications and a wound treatment was administered per physician's recommendation for one resident (#42) with a facility acquired wound of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings Include: Resident #42: Pressure Ulcer/Injury A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the right foot and ankle, Pressure ulcer sacrum unstageable, history of lung cancer, COPD, Morbid obesity, weakness, Chronic pancreatitis, and Gout. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 12/15 indicating mild cognitive loss and the resident needed assistance with care. On 6/24/2025 at 10:25 AM, Resident #42 was observed lying in bed, awake and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #81: Nutrition A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Heart failure, COPD, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety, and difficulty walking. On 6/24/2025 at 11:20 AM, Resident #81 was observed sitting in his room in bed. When asked about his meals at the facility, he said he was supposed to receive double portions of meat, but did not always receive them. He said he had talked to the Nurse Practitioner/NP and Unit Manager about it, but it didn't change anything. During the interview with Resident #81 on 6/24/2025 at 11:20 AM, he said the previous night, there were no hotdogs or hamburgers as an alternative to the regular menu. He said he was told by the staff they were out of them. The resident said he had to eat very greasy, grilled cheese. He said they gave him 2 grilled cheese, but he could only eat 1, because of the grease. The resident read the menu for 6/24/2025 and stated, Tonight they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This Citation pretains to Intake Number MI00153408. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain dental services timely for a Resident who received a partial denture for the bottom teeth that were ill-fitting, and unable to be used by the resident who had problems with chewing some foods for one resident (#84) of two residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: Resident #84: On 6/24/25 at 12:27 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #84 who was in his room, seated in a wheelchair. The Resident was asked about food services and reported he had issues with eating some of the foods that included chicken and hamburgers. The Resident was asked about issues with eating and the resident reported he had dentures that were made for the bottom teeth that when he received them, they did not fit properly. The Resident reported he can not wear the dentures at all because They don't fit. An observation was made of the resident's mouth with two teeth observed and the Resident explained that the denture was to fit around the remaining teeth,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00150954. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely obtain new prescription to reorder pain medication for one resident (#801) of two residents reviewed for pain management and pharmacy procedures, resulting in, Resident #801 going without her patch for three days and increased pain. Findings include: Resident #801: On 3/18/2025 at approximately 11:15 AM, a review was conducted of Resident #801's clinical record and it indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Acute Respiratory Failure, Depression, Hypertension and Amyloidosis. Resident #801 is cognitively intact and able to make her needs known to staff. On 3/18/2025 at 12:50 PM, Resident #801 reported her Fentanyl patch is supposed to be changed every three days but at the beginning of March she went without it for a few days, and no one could explain to her why. The resident shared the patch had fallen off and typically they would apply a new patch and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00147318. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor intravenous medication therapy per professional healthcare standards and a provider's order for two residents (Resident #702 and Resident # 703) of two residents reviewed for intravenous antibiotic therapy, resulting in Resident #703 being administered two doses of Vancomycin after elevated levels were received and a lack of monitoring and dosing of Resident #702's Vancomycin. Findings Include: Resident #702: On 10/15/2024 at approximately 4:00 PM, a review was conducted of Resident #702's medical records and it revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Necrotizing Fasciitis, Hypertension, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Stage 3 Kidney Disease and Supraventricular Tachycardia. Resident #702 was alert and able to make his needs known to staff. Further review was completed and yielded the following results: Physician Orders:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00145623 and MI00145776. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that wounds were assessed, monitored, and appropriate interventions were in place for one resident (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in Resident #3 developing a wound on the left foot great toe, left foot third toe and right foot third toe. Findings Include: Resident #3: On 9/16/2024 at 4:00 PM, Resident #3 was observed lying in bed in her room. She was awake, alert and very talkative. The resident was observed to have thick socks on. A review of the Face sheet and Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated that Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: Chronic kidney disease Stage 4, anemia, history of falls, fracture left ankle, diabetes, depression, history of seizures, anxiety, hypothyroidism, Dementia, and hypertension. A record review of an Orthopedic consult for Resident #3, dated 8/29/2024 at 10:00 AM, identified the following: Continue wound care for pressure sore on Left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145623. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary management of an indwelling urinary catheter for one resident (Resident #4) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in staff being unaware if Resident #4 had a urinary catheter. Findings Include: Resident #4: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses: Heart disease, Bipolar disorder, diabetes, left leg below the knee amputation, peripheral vascular disease, COPD, asthma, history of seizures, hypertension, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, chronic pain, depression and anxiety. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had full cognitive abilities and needed some assistance with care. The MDS section H identified the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. A review of the physician orders for Resident #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen, and maintain equipment and plumbing in good repair, resulting in an increased risk of food borne illness, affecting all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/29/24 at 1:43 PM, two wire racks, located in the walk-in cooler, were observed to have white mold-like accumulation. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be clean to sight and touch. Pf (B) The FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of cooking EQUIPMENT and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris. On 5/29/24 at 1:54 PM, the steamer, located on the cookline, was observed to be leaking water out of the front door on to multiple clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that accurate advance directive information was in place for two residents (Resident #88, Resident #182) of two residents reviewed for advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) from a total sample of 24 residents, resulting in potential for a resident's preferences for medical care not to be followed by the facility. Findings Include: Resident #182 (R182): Review of the medical record revealed R182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, repeated falls, dementia, pain in right leg, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), heart failure, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), hypothyroidism (low activity of thyroid gland), muscle weakness, and anemia (low red blood cells). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed R182 had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for one out of one residents (Resident #81) an assessment was completed for a half lap tray, and including the rational for the use of the lap tray. Findings Include: \Resident #81 (R81): Resident #81 (R81) was observed to have a half lap tray attached to his wheelchair on 5/30/2024 at 1:36 PM. In an observation on 6/04/2024 at 10:40 AM, R81 was observed to have a half lap tray attached to his wheelchair. Review of a Physician's order dated 9/7/2021, revealed R81 was ordered to have a half lap tray on his wheelchair at all times every day and evening shift for lap tray. The order did not specify what medical symptom the half lap tray was being used for R81. Record review of a Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 9/7/2021, revealed R81 was to have a half lap tray on his wheelchair at all times every day and evening shift for lap tray. The TAR did not specify why R81 required the use of the lap tray. No physical restraint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two out of 24 residents (Resident #26, Resident #81). Findings Include: Resident #26 (R26): Review of Physician's orders revealed R26 was ordered to receive Seroquel (treats schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression), 25 mg (milligrams) once a day for mood disorder. The orders also revealed R26 was ordered to receive Zoloft (treats depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and panic disorders) 50 mg one time a day. Review of R26's diagnoses list revealed R26 had diagnoses of visual hallucinations and depression. Review of R26's care plans revealed a care plan with a Focus of (R26) is at risk for adverse reactions and side effects r/t (related to) receiving an Antidepressant and Antipsychotic. The care plan interventions list side effects to be observed for, but were not specific to Seroquel or Zoloft, and did not reveal R26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for three of three residents reviewed for ADL care of dependent residents (R80, R91 and R32), from a total of 24 sampled residents, resulting in not achieving and/or maintaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: Resident #91 (R91): Review of the medical record revealed Resident #91 (R91) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's, Gastrostomy, Psychotic Disorder with Delusion and Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety. According to Resident #91 (R91)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R91 scored 04 out of 15 (severely cognitively impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had behaviors. R91 is dependent of toileting, showering/bathing, getting dressed and personal hygiene. During an interview on 05/29/24 at 04:30 PM, R91's daughter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility 1) Failed to perform dressing changes as ordered and 2) Failed to follow physician's orders for removal of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for one resident (Resident #74) of 24 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the potential for an infection and feelings of frustration and worthlessness. Findings include: Resident #74 (R74): Review of the admission Record reflected that Resident #74 (R74) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neurogenic bladder and sepsis. R74 was cognitively intact. On 05/30/24 at 11:33 AM, R74 was observed in his room and resting in his bed. R74 was playing on a gaming console. A peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line- a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) was observed on his left upper arm. R74 stated that the PICC line was being used for antibiotic infusions. R74 had stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to implement interventions to promote pressure ulcer healing and prevent the worsening of pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #37) and 2) Failed to prevent a pressure ulcer for two residents (Resident #37, Resident #91) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in facility-acquired pressure ulcers and the potential for delayed wound healing and/or the worsening of wounds. Findings include: Resident #37 (R37):: Review of the admission Record reflected that R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included gout, alcoholic liver disease, type two diabetes without complications, and degeneration of nervous system due to alcohol The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/8/24, reflected that R37 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (cognitively intact). R37 required partial assistance of one person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that necessary behavioral health care interventions were implemented for one resident (Resident #32) of 1 resident reviewed for behavioral and emotional needs, resulting in the potential for worsening signs and symptoms of depression, ongoing mental distress, isolation, and the potential for a decline in physical functioning. Findings include: Resident #32 (R32): Review of the admission Record reflected that R32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, heart failure, cerebral infarction (stroke) without residual deficits, chronic kidney disease stage 2, contracture, weakness, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, restlessness and agitation bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. R32 was cognitively intact and easily conversant. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5% when six medication errors were observed form a total of 29 opportunities for two residents (Resident #64, Resident #186) of five residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in a mediation error rate of 20.69% Findings Included: Resident #186 (R186): Review of R186 Medication Administration Record (MAR) demonstrated Insulin Lispro 100 unit/ml (milliliter) VL (vial) 10 ml. Inject as per sliding scale: if 100-150=0 units; 151-200=2 units; 201-250=4 units; 251-300=6 units; 301-350=8 units; 351-400=10 units if blood sugar is less than 70 or greater than 400 contact physician. Subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for DM II (Diabetes Mellitus). R186 (MAR) also demonstrated Fenofibrate Oral Tablet 145 MG (milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hyperlipidemia was to be given at 09:00 a.m. During observation of medication administration on 05/31/2024 at 08:54 a.m. Registered Nurse (RN) U was observed to enter R186's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for one resident (Resident #33) of 1 resident reviewed for medication errors resulting in Resident #33 not receiving a prescribed medication and the potential for a worsening infection. Findings include: Resident #33 (R33): Review of the admission Record reflected that R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), gastrostomy status, and heart failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/8/24, reflected that R33 scored a 1 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (cognitive impairment). On 5/31/24 at 2:36 PM, R33 was observed in bed. R33 had a tube feeding infusing. Adjacent to R33's bed was an intravenous line (IV) pole and IV infusion pump. Review of a Progress Note dated 4/12/2024 revealed R33 was being seen by her medical provider for a follow up of a right heel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve food at the preferred temperature for one resident (Resident #57) of two residents reviewed for food palpability, resulting in dissatisfaction during meals. Findings Include: Resident #57 (R57): Review of the medical record revealed R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included insomnia, depression, heart failure, arthritis, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), chronic pain syndrome, history of falling, weakness, hypertension, hyperlipemia (high fat content in blood), and anxiety. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/15/2024, revealed R57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During observation and interview on 05/29/2024 at 01:45 p.m. R57 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair at the side of her bed. She explained that the food, at the facility was poor and that the food is frequently cold. During observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to coordinate hospice services for one resident (Resident #59) of one resident reviewed for Hospice Services, resulting in the potential of care not being provided to a resident receiving hospice services and the potential for residents not to be fully informed of hospice services provided. Findings Included Resident #59 (R59): Review of the medical record revealed R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), weakness, gastro-esophageal reflux, seizures, hypotension (low blood pressure), anxiety, traumatic brain injury, and malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer of the prostate). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/12/2024, revealed R59 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 (moderately impaired) out of 15. Section O-Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs (with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This Citation pertains to Intake MI00141928. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and accessibility of non-expired and necessary emergency medical equipment and supplies in two of two emergency medical response carts resulting in expired and unsanitary emergency medications and medical supplies, lack of easily accessible, critical, and consistent equipment and supplies during an emergency situation and the likelihood for delay of care and deterioration of all resident(s) experiencing an emergency medical situation. Findings include: Review of intake documentation, received 1/5/24, revealed the facility crash cart was not fully stocked and the supplies on cart were outdated resulting in a delay in care. On 5/22/24 at 11:30 AM, an observation of the emergency medical cart (Crash Cart) in the central (long term) area of the facility, directly across from the nurses' station revealed the number on the plastic lock did not match the number documented on the Crash Cart May 2024 log. The Crash Cart log included the sections, AED…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00144106 and MI00143864. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of abuse by a staff member for three residents (Resident #702, Resident #709, and Resident #711) of three residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of administrative oversight to identify and monitor for increased risk of abuse by staff, and prevent abuse. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident #709 experienced verbal abuse and neglect, and Resident #702 and Resident #711 experienced physical abuse, including intimidation, and the likelihood for feelings of fear and emotional distress utilizing the reasonable person concept. Findings include: Resident #709: Review of intake documentation dated received 4/10/24 revealed Resident #709 told Hospice Registered Nurse (RN) F that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G had tried to touch them sexually on 4/9/24 and they did not want CNA G to take care of them. Hospice RN F notified their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00141348. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to 1) Implement meaningful fall interventions; 2) Complete a Neurological Record and 15-minute checks after falls; and 3) Investigate and complete root cause analysis of falls for one resident (Resident #901), resulting in, Resident #901 falling three times in short succession, without appropriate investigation, intervention and follow through. Findings Include: Resident #901: On 12/19/2023 at 4:15 PM, Resident #901 was observed sleeping peacefully in this room with a facility sitter in the chair next to him. The CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the resident is 1:1 on all shifts due to his falls. On 12/19/2023 at approximately 4:25 PM, an interview was conducted with Nurse A regarding Resident #901's fall. It was reported he just returned to the facility after being admitted to the hospital and is on a 1:1 due to his impulsivity and inability to see his need for assistance. After his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain 1) sanitary non-food contact surfaces, 2) plumbing in good repair, 3) properly cool food, and 4) maintain food temperature logs for serve ready foods, resulting in potential contamination of food and the physical facility, affecting all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Finding include: On 6/14/23 at 8:35 AM, a white mildew-like substance was observed to be accumulating on multiple tiers of the wire racks in the walk-in cooler. At this time, Dietician K was queried on the cleaning frequency of the wire racks and was unaware. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, NonfoodContact Surfaces, and Utensils. (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be clean to sight and touch. Pf (B) The FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of cooking EQUIPMENT and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00134303. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with respect and dignity by not answering call lights timely, meals not served at a palatable temperature and dislikes not taken into account, care not provided with dignity and respect, and that a change of clothing was provided, for four residents (Resident #13, Resident #42, Resident #49, Resident #53) on the initial tour of the survey, and resident from the Confidential Group of Residents, of 22 Residents reviewed for treatment with dignity and respect, resulting in long call light wait times for care, staff use of personal phone while providing resident care, unmet care needs, meals not eaten, feelings of frustration, embarrassment, worthlessness and being belittled, and the potential for weight loss, dissatisfaction with living conditions and lack of psychosocial wellbeing. Findings include: On 6/14/23 at 9:56 AM, during the initial tour of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and home-like environment to ensure that hallways, resident rooms, floors and other facility areas and equipment were clean, uncluttered, in good repair and free of ants resulting in an unclean physical environment, resident dissatisfaction and complaints regarding the lack of cleanliness. Findings Include: On 6/14/23 at 9:45 AM, during the initial tour of the building and again on 6/15/2023 and 6/16/2023, multiple resident rooms on the 400 hall were extremely cluttered with clothes and other items piled on the floor and surfaces. Some residents had containers and cartons of food and drink stored on the floor and some residents had trash on the floor. Some of the room had little space to walk beside some sides of the bed as items were piled on the floor. During the initial tour of the building on 6/14/2023, the following rooms were observed to have a significant amount of clutter on the floor and surfaces in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for three residents (Resident #16, Resident #28 and Resident #61) of 30 residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #16 lacking a care plan to address a need for dental services due to a cracked tooth; Resident #28 did not have a care plan to address breathing treatments, and Resident #61 lacked a care plan to address oxygen therapy and a left leg cast. Findings Include: Resident #16 : On 6/14/23 at 9:54 AM, Resident #16 was observed in her room lying in bed awake. She said she had a cracked tooth and pointed into her mouth. Resident #16 said she was supposed to go to the dentist today, but the bus did not show up. Nurse AA entered the resident's room and said the resident's son had scheduled the appointment and transportation. She said the transportation company confused the dates and the appointment was canceled, and the resident's son was to reschedule. The resident was not sure about this. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plans in a timely manner with changes of condition for three residents (Residents #4, Resident #71, Resident #262), resulting in missed revision and interventions necessary for care and services not being care planned with the likelihood of unmet care needs. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Care planning' policy dated 6/24/2021 revealed that every resident in the facility will have a person-centered Plan of Care developed and implemented that is consistent with the residents' rights, based on the comprehensive assessment that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs . (9.) The care plan and resident Kardex will be updated . this includes adding new focuses, goals, and interventions . Resident #4: Purple urinary bag syndrome Observation and interview on 06/14/23 at 09:02 AM of Resident #4 was seated up in wheelchair at bedside with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1) Sanitary storage of nebulizer equipment for Residents # 28, #48, #84 and #312 and 2) Monitoring during respiratory treatment through a tracheostomy tube for Resident #48, of seven residents reviewed for respiratory care, resulting in the potential exposure to infectious organisms, respiratory infections, and adverse reactions left unnoticed and untreated. Findings include: Resident #48: A review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 5/7/18 with readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia, diseases of bronchus, atrial fibrillation, and tracheostomy status. The review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident had intact cognition and needed extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. On 6/14/23 at 9:17 AM, an observation was made of Resident #48 sleeping in bed. The Resident was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments timely for three residents (Resident #55, Resident #89 and Resident #94), resulting in late MDS transmissions. Findings include: Resident #55: On 6/16/23, at 10:37 AM, a record review of Resident #55's electronic medical record revealed a discharge date : [DATE]. A review of the MINIMUM DATA SET (MDS 3.0) SUMMARY revealed ARD/Target Date: 2023-02-20 . MDS Export Ready . A review of the MDS list revealed . Date 2/20/2023 Discharge Return Not Anticipated Status Export Ready . Resident #89: On 6/16/23, at 10:45 AM, a record review of Resident #89's electronic medical record revealed a discharge date : [DATE]. A review of the MINIMUM DATA SET (MDS 3.0) SUMMARY revealed ARD/Target Date: 2023-02-01 . MDS Export Ready . A review of the MDS list revealed . Date 2/01/2023 Discharge Return Not Anticipated Status Export Ready . Resident #94: On 6/16/23, at 10:50 AM, a record review of Resident #94's electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00134303. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Restorative Nursing services were documented as provided and evaluated to maintain and promote the Resident's abilities to maintain optimal physical functioning for two residents (Resident#13 and Resident #30) of three residents reviewed for range of motion, resulting in not receiving planned services to maintain their current level of functionality and mobility and the potential to have a decrease in physical mobility, range of motion and an overall decrease level of functioning. Findings include: Resident #13: A review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 8/26/21 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, diabetes, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following stroke affecting right dominant side, atrial fibrillation, depression, and muscle wasting and atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00136186. Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to document neuro checks after an unwitnessed fall for one resident (Resident #210), resulting in the likelihood for a decline in overall health status. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Fall Management' policy dated 8/18/2022 revealed a fall as an unintentional coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level. A fall without injury is still a fall. Unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred. If a potential head injury is present, complete the Neurological Record. Record review of the facility presented 'Neurological Assessment, Long-Term Care' web article/policy dated 2/20/2023, no page numbers and no web address noted. The web article/policy revealed a neurological assessment is an indispensable tool for quickly evaluating a resident's neurological status. This procedure supplements the routine measurements of vital signs, such as temperature, pulse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor urinary catheters for two residents (Resident #4, Resident #53) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in cross contamination, purple bag syndrome with the likelihood of infection. Findings include. Resident #53: On 6/14/23, at 10:30 AM, Resident #53 was sitting in their wheelchair in their room their urinary catheter bag was hooked under their wheelchair. Approximately 4 inches of the catheter tubing was resting on the floor. On 6/15/23, at 3:30 PM, a record review of Resident #53's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Stroke, Dementia and Urinary tract infection. Resident #53 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL.) On 6/16/23, at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if Resident #53's catheter tubing should be on the floor and the DON stated, no. Resident #4: Purple urinary bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure narcotic reconciliation was completed accurately, 2) Failed to ensure a medication narcotic drawer was free of pre-drawn narcotics (Morphine) and 3) Failed to to ensure the 300-Hall medication cart was free of loose pills, resulting in unkept medication carts, the likelihood of narcotic drug diversion going unnoticed and the likelihood of medication errors. Findings include: On 6/15/23, at 9:06 AM, an observation of the 300-hall medication cart along with Infection Control (IC) Nurse G was conducted. There were loose whole pills and broken half pieces of pills scattered on the bottom of the main medication drawer totaling to 9. IC Nurse G gathered the pills, was asked what they planned to do with them and IC Nurse G stated, I am going to discard them. IC Nurse G locked the medication cart and handed the medication cart keys to Nurse E in the hallway. On 6/15/23, at 9:16 AM, Nurse E took the keys from IC Nurse G walked towards the 300-hall medication cart and unlocked the cart with the keys. Nurse E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility 1) Failed to operationalize the Infection Control program; 2) Failed to ensure proper PPE in a contact isolation for Resident #26; 3) Failed to prohibit the use of multidose soap for resident care going room-to-room, and 4) Failed to assess purple bag syndrome (urinary catheter) for Resident #4, resulting in the lack of data analysis of the Infection Control program for the month of March 2023, likelihood for cross contamination of organisms and the identification of purple bag syndrome in a urinary catheter. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Infection Prevention Program Overview' policy dated 9/9/2022 revealed the facility establishes a program under which it investigates, identifies, prevents, reports and controls infections and communicable diseases for all residents and staff . The major activities of the program are surveillance of infections with implementation of control measures and prevention of infections. Infection Preventionist responsibilities may include collecting, analyzing, and providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$89,021 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $58,422 — penalty dated 2024-05-23
- $30,599 — penalty dated 2023-12-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-22 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2002 |
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2002 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/21/2025 |
| CHERRY, MELVIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| PEDROTTI, REBECCA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/10/2020 |
| MOHAMMAD A QAZI LIVING TRUST DATED 09/26/97 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2002 |
| DEUTSCH, NEAL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
| GARDINA, ANNA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235550. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.