The Manor of Novi
24500 Meadowbrook Rd, Novi, MI 48375 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (248) 477-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $67,496 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-21)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.3% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.9% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.5% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.1% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 57.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.8% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.8% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.3% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.5% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.70 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.32 | 1.64 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.5%CMS range 24.9–48.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.4–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.0–15.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 97.2 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2588311.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify upon admission and provide treatment and services for a Stage Three pressure ulcer (having full-thickness skin loss, not involving underlying fibrous tissue) for one resident (R4) of four residents reviewed for pressure wounds resulting in a delay of treatment, pain and worsening of a sacral pressure wound. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) of the left foot requiring amputation of the toes and required administration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics via PICC (Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter) line, had Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) due to kidney failure and required hemodialysis. R4 was alert, orientated, and capable of making their needs known.On 4/6/26 around 10:30 AM, during initial introductions, R4 voiced a concern that their dressing on their bottom was missed being changed over the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent avoidable falls for three residents (R#'s 5, 60, and 50) of five residents reviewed for falls resulting in R5 sustaining a fracture to their left shoulder causing pain and hospital care, and provide supervision for wandering residents for two residents (R#'s 18 and 81) of two residents reviewed for supervision. Findings include: On 4/6/26 at approximately 12:19 PM, R5 was observed lying in bed. Their left arm was in a sling and assist bars were observed on both sides of the bed. R5 was alert and able to answer all questions asked. R5 reported that they were admitted to the facility on [DATE], primarily to receive in-house Dialysis care. They noted that on day two of their stay, they needed to take a bowel movement and needed assistance as they are immobile. At that time, they did not have assist bar(s) in place and further their needed their mattress changed. They noted that the needed mattress was in the room but had not yet been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. DPS #1 This citation pertains to Intake #MI00140460. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with Type 1 diabetes was timely assessed for low blood sugar for one (R84) of three residents reviewed for change in condition/hospitalization resulting in R84's being found unconscious and hyperventilating with a blood sugar level of 34 causing a transfer to the emergency room and a six day stay at the hospital. Findings include: A Complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged the facility failed to ensure R84's low blood sugar was timely addressed causing the resident to become unconscious and in need of hospitalization. On 12/19/23 at approximately 4:00 PM, R84 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer some questions. R84 was asked questions about the facility nursing staff's ability to monitor their blood sugar levels. During the interview R84's roommate chimed in and reported an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient nurse staffing to meet the needs of multiple residents, including, but not limited to (R101, 55, 79, 44, 58, 17) and 11 anonymous residents that participated in the resident council meeting, resulting in the potential for delayed care for activities of daily living, medication administration and treatments to all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 4/6/26 at 9:28 AM, R58 was observed lying in bed. R58 was asked about care in the facility. R58 explained frequently it took staff approximately one hour to answer the call light. R58 was asked what time of day was usually the longer wait. R58 explained at night and on the weekends were the longest waiting time. On 4/6/26 at 9:30 AM, R101 was heard crying from the hallway. At that time, R101 was interviewed about the care in the facility. R101 stated, I just want to go home and explained the last time their incontinence brief was changed was around 11:00 PM the previous night (4/5/26). R101 reported when she was sleeping, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service and hydration areas resulting in the potential to spread foodborne illness to all residents. Findings Include:On 04/06/2026 at 8:55 AM during an initial kitchen tour observed in the upright cooler: opened container of hummus with facility marked use by dates of 3/27-4/4 and an opened package of sliced cooked turkey breast with facility marked use dates of 3/31-4/5. Dietary staff member 'LL' discarded upon observation. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 3-501.18 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Disposition. (A) A FOOD specified in 3-501.17(A) or (B) shall be discarded if it: (1) Exceeds the temperature and time combination specified in 3-501.17(A) .On 04/06/2026 at 9:32 AM observed (2) of the nursing hydration carts getting prepared for use on the units. Each cart had an attached mesh bag for storage of the ice scoop. On both carts the storage bags were soiled/discolored on the bottom interior and not removable for routine cleaning.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment in a dignified manner for seven residents (R#'s 45, 50, 21, 32, 8, 18, and 60) of seven residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in verbalized complaints from the anonymous group interview and the potential for embarrassment. Findings include: 4/6/26 at 10:19 AM, CNA 'F' was observed transporting R45 to the shower room on the B-Wing via a shower chair. CNA 'F' was observed pulling the chair in a forward motion with R45 facing rearward. On 4/6/26 at 12:06 PM, an observation of the lunch meal in the Meadowbrook dining room was conducted. There were numerous residents seated at tables awaiting their meals to be served. At that time, it was also observed three staff, CNA 'C', CNA 'E', and Nurse 'G' were present in the room. The staff members were talking across the dining room amongst themselves about the resident's physical abilities to feed themselves and were repeatedly overheard to refer to some of the residents as, feeders. On 4/6/26 at 12:39 PM, CNA 'D' was in the dining room assisting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake Number: 2563496. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly act on grievances expressed by resident council members affecting nine of 11 residents who attended the confidential resident council interview, resulting in ongoing, unresolved concerns. Findings include: A review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes from October 2025 through March 2026 revealed the following: On 3/25/26, 2/27/26, 1/30/26, and 11/20/25, it was documented in the minutes that residents had a concern with not receiving fresh water every day. On 3/25/26, it was documented in the minutes that residents had concerns with Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) splitting rooms, using phones during care, and telling residents they would be right back but did not come back.On 4/7/26 at 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with 11 residents, all who frequently or sometimes attended the resident council meetings in the facility. When queried about how they expressed concerns to the facility in resident council and if the facility took steps to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services according to professional standards of practice related to administering medications for two (R22 and R101) of two residents observed; failed to ensure diet orders were clarified and accurate for one (R98) of two resident reviewed for tube feeding; and failed to assess skin under an undated dressing for one (R96) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Findings include:R22 and R101 On 4/6/26 at 9:42 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'I' entered the room of R22 and R101 with both residents' medications. LPN 'I' first gave R101 her medications and then R22. On 4/6/26 at 2:20 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN 'I'. When queried about protocols for medication administration and whether multiple residents' medications should be prepared at the same time, LPN 'I' reported they were not supposed to be prepared at the same time, but she was just trying to get them done. On 4/7/26 at 12:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, implement treatment, and follow physician's orders for treatment and preventative care for one (R32) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, resulting in the development of 10 open areas to the resident's left lower leg and a delay in treatment. Findings include: On 4/6/26 at 10:01 AM, R32 was observed seated in a geriatric positioning recliner (geri-chair). R32 was awake but did not make eye contact or engage in conversation. R32 was observed kicking their left leg straight up into the air and then forcefully back down onto the footrest of the geri-chair repeatedly. Five pink colored open areas were observed on the top of R32's left lower leg with no dressing applied. A review of R32's clinical record revealed an active physician's order to clean left shin with NS (normal saline), pat dry, cover with border gauze and Tubi grip (elastic bandage) to bilateral legs, remove tubi grip and check skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received needed pain and antibiotic medication for an infected tooth for one (R8) out of two residents reviewed for dental/pain services resulting in continuous pain for over one month. Findings include:On 4/6/26 at approximately 10:15 AM, R8 was observed sitting in their wheelchair, food covered their shirt. R8 was alert and able to answer most questions asked, however their speech was slurred at times. R8 reported that they were in pain. The resident was asked if they wanted to see a nurse and they noted they did. The resident's call light was out of reach and Nurse CC was told that the resident reported they were in pain. A review of R8's clinical record revealed they initially were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: DiGeorge Syndrome (a complex gene disorder), severe depressive disorder, and bacterial infection. A review of R8's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes 2563496 and 2748674Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were acquired and administered per physician orders for one [R96] of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:Review of the clinical record revealed R96 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: peripheral vascular disease, heart disease and dementia. According to the Minimum Data Set [MDS] assessment dated [DATE], R96 had moderately impaired cognition.Review of R96's progress notes revealed multiple Medication Administration Notes dated 4/2/26, 4/3/26, 4/4/26, 4/5/26 that documented Pregabalin [medication used for nerve pain] 100 milligrams [mg] was on order and waiting for the pharmacy to deliver.Review of physician orders for R96 revealed an order dated 4/2/26 for, Pregbalin Oral Capsule 100 MG. Give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for Neuropathy. Active. Start Date: 4/2/26.Review of R96's April…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fresh water was passed and available to residents consistently and upon request for four (R4, R22, R79, R101) of four residents reviewed for hydration. Findings include: On 4/6/26 at 9:30 AM, R101 and R22 (who were roommates) were observed with Styrofoam cups dated 4/5/26 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Both residents indicated water was last passed on the morning of 4/5/26 and not passed since then (24 hours later). On 4/6/26 at 10:04 AM, R79 was observed with a Styrofoam water cup dated 4/5/26 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. When queried about whether she had fresh water, R79 shook the cup which was empty and said nobody passed fresh water since Sunday morning (4/5/26). On 4/7/26 at 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with 11 residents who wished to remain anonymous. Nine of 11 residents reported they did not receive fresh water every day. One resident said it was a chronic problem. Another resident said they went a whole day without water. Multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents call light was within reach for one (R8) out of one resident reviewed for call light status. Findings includeOn 4/6/26 at approximately 10:15 AM, R8 was observed sitting in their wheelchair, food covered their shirt. R5 was alert and able to answer most questions asked. R8 reported that they were in pain. The resident was asked if they wanted to see a nurse and they noted they did. The resident's call light was out of reach and Nurse CC was told that the resident reported they were in pain. On 4/8/26 at approximately 12:06 PM, R8 was observed sitting in their wheelchair. The resident was asked how they were feeling and reported that they were in pain and pointed to their lower left jaw area. R8 was asked if they needed assistance and noted that they did. The resident's call light was on the other side of their bed, and the resident could not push the call light for assistance. R8 noted that they believed staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for two (R79 and R98) of four residents reviewed for the environment, resulting in R79 having to clean their own bathroom at times and R98 expressing frustration with a non-working clock. Findings include: On 4/6/26 at 9:58 AM, R98 was observed lying in bed. At that time, an interview was conducted with the resident. R98 answered mostly with yes and no answers but appeared to understand the questions asked. The clock on the wall at the foot of R98s bed read 8:50 with the second hand staying in the same position. A second observation was made at 2:20 PM and the clock read the same time, 8:50. On 4/7/26 at 1:06 PM, an observation of R98's clock was made and it remained at 8:50. An interview was conducted with R98. When queried about whether she was able to read the clock, R98 nodded her head and said Yes. When queried about whether it was important for her to know the actual time, R98…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to release a seatbelt restraint during supervised activities and supervised dining and document the removal of the restraint every two hours per the physician's order for one resident, (R60) of two residents reviewed for restraints. Findings include: On 4/6/26 at 10:25 AM, R60 was observed in their room in their wheelchair with a seatbelt across their waist. At that time, R60 was asked if they could unbuckle the belt and they did not answer the question or attempt to release the belt, rather they pleasantly chatted about an unrelated topic. On 4/7/26 at 2:58 PM, R60 was observed in the activity room seated in their wheelchair with their seatbelt fastened across their waist. Staff were observed to be present in the room during the scheduled music activity. On 4/8/26 at 12:50 PM, R60 was observed in the dining room in their wheelchair eating their lunch meal. It was noted their seatbelt was fastened across their waist. Several staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2789175.Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of alleged mistreatment for one of one resident (R106) reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Findings include:Findings include:Clinical record review revealed R106 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent re-admission on [DATE] and had medical history of diabetes managed with insulin, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and required hemodialysis. R106 was physically compromised and required a Hoyer Lift (mechanical device to transfer an induvial with limited mobility). R106 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessed on 1/15/2026 documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) 13/15 indicating no cognitive impairment.On 4/6/26 at 1:25 PM, a telephone interview with the spouse (complainant) alleged on Super Bowl Sunday 2/8/26, The spouse said a nurse over the weekend called them reporting the injury and that I&A (Investigation and Accident) form had to be completed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist one (R98) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily with oral hygiene and feeding assistance. Findings include:On 4/6/26 at 9:58 AM, R98 was observed lying in bed receiving nutrition through a feeding tube. A cup of orange juice was observed on the resident's over-bed table with a straw. When R98 opened their mouth, a copious amount of thick, stringy, white substance was observed extending from the top of R98's mouth to the bottom. When queried, R98 reported staff did not often assist with brushing their teeth. When queried about their preference, R98 reported they would like their mouth cleaned and teeth brushed. A review of R98's clinical record revealed the following active physician's orders: Regular diet Pureed texture, Thin consistency, 1:1 (one to one) assistance at all meals for Pleasure feeding with a start date of 3/11/26. On 4/7/26 at 8:48 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 'V' delivered a breakfast tray to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice to assess and monitor the continued need for a PICC (Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter) for antibiotic administration for one (R4) of one reviewed for Intravenous (IV) therapy. Findings include:Clinical record review revealed R4 was admitted to facility on 3/12/26 for osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) of the left foot requiring amputation of the toes and required administration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics via PICC (Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter) line, had Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) due to kidney failure and required hemodialysis. R4 was alert, orientated, and capable of making their needs known.On 4/6/26 around 10:30 AM, during initial introductions, R4 voiced concern of the PICC line observed in their right upper arm. R4 said the PICC was placed for antibiotics, not used in a while. When asked if the line was flushed (to maintain patency), R4 said the last time someone tried, it would not flush. R4 said it is uncomfortable and starting to annoy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA NN and SS) out of five CNAs reviewed for competency evaluations received new hire evaluations, continuous yearly evaluations and 1:1 training regarding falls and transfers. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents at the facility, including R5. Findings include: CNA NN On 4/6/26 at approximately 12:19 PM, R5 was observed lying in bed. Their left arm was in a sling. R5 reported that on 3/4/26, a CNA (herein after CNA NN) turned them on their side and placed a bedpan on the bed. CNA NN then left the room leaving them on their side, and they rolled off the bed. They were sent to the Hospital and diagnosed with a fracture to their left shoulder. A review of the facility Incident/Accident (IA) Report involving R5 revealed the following: .Alleged Incident.Date: 3/4/26.Resident (R5).Brief Description: Nurse was alerted to resident's room. (R5) was observed lying on the floor. She complained of left shoulder pain. Was transported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (R4) of one reviewed for EBP. Findings include:Clinical record review revealed R4 was admitted to facility on 3/12/26 for osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) of the left foot requiring amputation of the toes and required administration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics via PICC (Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter) line, had Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) due to kidney failure and required hemodialysis. R4 was alert, orientated, and capable of making their needs known.On 4/8/26 at 11:30 AM, A pressure ulcer dressing observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Q was conducted for R4. Prior to entering R4's room, it was observed there was no EBP signage or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPN Q was observed donning only gloves to cleanse and provide treatment to an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage with the ulcer cannot be confirmed) coccyx pressure ulcer that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Complaint #2729896Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency (SA) for one (R701) out of one resident reviewed for neglect/injury of unknown origin. Findings include:A complaint was filed with the SA that alleged R701 sustained bruising to their right shoulder and a fracture to their hip during their five-day Hospice respite stay at the facility.A review of R701's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility for respite services on 12/28/25 with diagnosis that included: unspecified dementia, chronic respiratory failure and history of falling.Continued review of R701's record noted, in part, the following:12/28/25 (2:12 PM): Resident arrived to facility.pain 0/10.Medication verified with hospice.Skin note: R (right) top of ankle discoloration and slight redness to front peri area.12/29/25: Administration Note: .Resident able to go to the restroom with one person assist.12/29/25: History and Physical: .she was admitted to the. facility for hospice respite care.found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to respect a resident's right to choices for one resident (R601) of three residents reviewed for resident rights resulting in verbalized complaints, frustration, and dissatisfaction with an assigned caregiver. Findings include:A complaint received by the State Agency alleged a caregiver who was not supposed to be assigned to the resident's care was assigned to their care. On 7/15/25 at 11:30 AM, an interview was conducted with R601. They said they had a conflict with a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) sometime in May. They said they were a new CNA, had a bad attitude, and they were rude. R601 was not able to identify the CNA in question by name but said they reported them to Unit Manager 'A'. They continued to say Unit Manager 'A' told them the CNA would no longer be assigned to their care. They went on to say the CNA they reported was again assigned to their care on the night shift of June 9th and so they made their complaint to the State Agency on June 10th.On 7/15/25 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with Unit Manager 'A'.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their grievance process for one resident (R601) of three residents reviewed for grievances, resulting in an undesired caregiver being assigned to the resident's care after they requested they no longer be assigned to their care. Findings include: On 7/15/25 at 11:30 AM, an interview was conducted with R601. They said they had a conflict with a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) sometime in May. They said they were a new CNA, had a bad attitude, and they were rude. R601 was not able to identify the CNA in question by name but said they reported them to Unit Manager 'A' after the incident. They continued to say Unit Manager 'A' told them the CNA would no longer be assigned to their care. They went on to say the CNA they reported was again assigned to their care on the night shift of June 9th. They were asked if they were assisted to fill out a grievance form and said they were not. On 7/15/25 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with Unit Manager 'A'. They were asked if R601 had reported a CNA's behavior and requested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Water Pitcher: On 1/30/25 9:20 AM observation of the C-hall medication cart had a clear plastic pitcher filled with water and ice stored on top of the cart. There was a sticker that had a handwritten date of 1/28. On 1/30/25 at 9:26 AM, Nurse 'E' was observed to return to the medication cart and confirmed they were assigned to the entire unit. When asked about the process for changing the water, ice, and plastic pitchers stored on the medication cart, Nurse 'E' reported they forgot to change the pitcher. When asked how often that gets changed, Nurse 'E' reported they would get a fresh pitcher every two to three days and further stated We don't have a standard of when we change our pitchers. Nurse 'E' was then observed to remove the existing sticker dated 1/28 and placed a new sticker dated 1/30. On 1/30/25 at 9:55 AM, an interview was conducted with Unit Manager (UM 'F') who reported had been in their role since Friday 1/24/25. When asked about the changing of the water pitchers on the medication carts, UM 'F' reported those should be changed out at the end of each night shift and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect personal health information for nine residents (R#'s 89, 45, 266, 71, 73, 26, 38 and 42) of nine residents reviewed for personal privacy. Findings include: On 1/28/25 at 9:18 AM and 1/29/25 at 4:15 PM, an observation of the nursing station on the A unit revealed a bulletin board visible from anyone passing by that listed R89, R45, R266, R71, R73, R26, R38, and R42's names and the times they were to attend dialysis treatments. On 1/30/24 at 10:45 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing regarding resident's private health information observed on the A unit and they indicated the Unit Manager posted the schedules but it should not be visible to anyone passing by and could have had a privacy cover placed over it. According to the facility's policy titled HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) Policy Regarding Use and Disclosure of PHI (Protected Health Information) for Treatment dated 9/30/2021: .Privacy and confidentiality. The resident has a right to personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of restraints, documented medical symptoms for the use of restraints, and consent for use for two residents (R#'s 59 and 67), of two residents reviewed for restraints. Findings include: R59 On 1/29/25 at 10:05 AM, R59 was observed in their room seated in a Merry [NAME] (a wheeled walker with a seat surrounded by a frame containing a hinged gate and belt to secure the user in the device that is not considered a restraint if the resident can exit the walker). At that time, R59 was asked of they could unbuckle the belt, lift the gate, and exit the framed walker. R59 responded Yes. They were asked to demonstrate their ability to exit the walker and repeated Yes. They were asked again to demonstrate their ability to get out of the walker and again repeated Yes, showing no indication they understood the request or their ability to physically complete the request. A review of R59's clinical record revealed they admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address a resident's use of a midline intravenous (IV) line, use of antibiotics, and multiple infections for one (R111) of two residents reviewed for infection care planning. Findings include: On 1/30/25 at 8:34 AM, R111 was observed laying in bed asleep, with a blue wedge pillow under their right torso, and their left arm was observed swollen and propped on a pillow. There was a urinary catheter drainage bag secured to the side of the bed and an IV (Intravenous) pole with an empty bag of antibiotic medication placed next to their bed. Review of the clinical record revealed R111 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute gastritis with bleeding, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and cellulitis. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R111 had intact cognition and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of R111's physician orders included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided per professional nursing standards for one resident, (R75) of five residents reviewed during the medication administration observation. Findings include: On 1/29/25 at 9:23 AM, Nurse 'J' was observed preparing medications for administration to R75 at the medication cart in the hallway. The medications prepared were placed in a medication cup and it was not observed Tylenol had been removed from the cart and placed into the cup. Upon completing the preparation, Nurse 'J' entered R75's room and handed them the medication cup. R75 looked at the pills in the cup and asked Nurse 'J' if one of the large pills in the cup was Tylenol. Nurse 'J' told them no and said, the little pill is the Tylenol. R75 then proceeded to take the medications. On 1/29/25 at 9:39 AM, an interview was conducted with Nurse 'J'. They were asked why they told R75 one of the pills in the medication cup was Tylenol when no Tylenol had been prepared and taken into the room. In a defensive tone, Nurse 'J' said, I don't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine showers/baths and hygiene care were provided for two (R91 and R52) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: R91 On 1/28/25 at 11:55 AM, R91 was observed seated in a wheelchair just outside of their room. When asked about their care and whether they received baths or showers per their schedule, R91 reported they were supposed to get a shower last Friday, but they never did and they further reported it had been a while since they had one. When asked if staff informed them of the reason they might not be able to get a shower on their scheduled days, R91 reported they say they'll be too busy. Review of R91's shower/bath schedule in the task section of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented and the resident was scheduled to have a shower/bath on Tuesdays and Fridays on the PM (evening) shift. Review of the clinical record revealed R91 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were provided per physician's orders for one resident (R46) of one resident reviewed for non-pressure ulcer wound care, resulting in verbalized complaints and the potential for the worsening of wounds. Findings include: On 1/30/25 at 9:24 AM, R46 was observed lying in their bed. They had soft heel boots on both of their feet and bulky bandages were wrapped around their feet and ankles. The tape securing the bandaging was observed to be dated 1/28/25. At that time R46 was asked if staff provided them wound care per physician's orders and said they did not. They indicated the dressings on their feet were to be changed daily, however; it was not being done daily. A review of R46's clinical record was conducted and revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: chronic kidney disease, deep vein thrombosis (blood clots), diabetes, and high blood pressure. A review of a wound care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions and provide care to prevent accidents for two residents, (R#'s 67 and 74) of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in a fall and the potential for injuries. Findings include: On 1/28/25 at 11:30 AM, R67 was observed in their room. They were seated in their wheelchair equipped with a seatbelt fastened around their waist. The wheelchair was not equipped with anti-tipping devices. An interview was attempted with R67, however; they did not respond. On 1/28/25 at approximately 4:00 PM, R67 was observed sleeping in their bed. Their wheelchair was placed in the hallway and the cushion was not observed with Dycem (a non-slip material used to stabilize surfaces) in place. A review of R67's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included; falls, femur fracture, cataracts, anxiety, and dementia. Their most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5% when two medication errors were made for two residents (R#'s 57 and 75) of five residents reviewed during the medication pass observation, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69%. Findings include: On 1/28/25 at 9:12 AM, Nurse 'K' was observed preparing medications for administration to R57. Nurse 'K' prepared multiple medications including a 600 mg (milligram) calcium supplement. Nurse 'K' entered the room, administered the medications to R57, exited the room and signed the medications out as given on the medication administration record. On 1/30/25 at 11:22 AM, a review of R57's medication orders was conducted and revealed R57 did not have an order for a 600 mg calcium supplement, rather they had an active order for Calcium Carbonate-Vitamin D 500 mg-200 mg combination supplement. On 1/29/25 at 9:23 AM, Nurse 'I' was observed preparing medications for administration to R75. The medications prepared included Dorzolamide eye-drop 2% (glaucoma treatment) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered x-rays for one resident, (R69) of one resident reviewed for radiology/diagnostic services. Findings include: Review of R69's physician orders included an order dated 12/28/24 for an x-ray of the right shoulder and hips related to pain. Review of the record did not reveal documentation that the x-rays had been obtained. Further review of the record revealed that R69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: type 2 diabetes, insomnia, and end-stage renal disease. On 1/29/25 at 8:44 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). When asked about the timeframe for a diagnostic order (x-ray) to be completed, the DON reported if it was a STAT order, usually within 4 to 6 hours but if it was a general order the nurse practitioner would put it in for three days so it would not get missed. The DON was then asked if they could locate the results of R69's x-ray ordered on 12/28/24 of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a doorway frame was maintained in a safe manner for two (R36 and R54) of two residents reviewed for safe environment, resulting in the potential for injury (laceration). Findings include: On 1/28/25 at 11:35 AM, 1/29/25 at 2:15 PM, and 1/30/25 9:30 AM, observations of the C-Hall revealed the room occupied by R36 and R54 was observed to have a doorway frame that had a sharp metal strip around the bottom portion that was pulled away and exposed sharp metal edges (at about the ankle height of anyone that entered the room). On 1/30/25 at 9:55 AM, an interview was conducted with Unit Manager (UM 'F') who reported they were in their role since Friday 1/24/25. When asked about the process if staff identified concerns with the environment such as broken door frames, UM 'F' reported they used the TELS (an electronic reporting system). UM 'F' was asked about the state of R36 and R54's doorframe and confirmed the sharp metal and stated they would have to be covered right away. They denied being aware of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake# MI00147133 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents right to receive unopened and private mail delivery for one (R701) out of four residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: A complaint was filled with the State Agency (SA) that alleged the facility opened R701's postal package containing items from a pharmacy a week prior to them receiving the package. In addition, they alleged that some of the items, including mouth wash and bed pads, were missing from the package. On 11/12/24 at approximately 11:28 AM, R701 was observed lying in bed in their room. The resident was alert and able to answer questions asked. R701 was asked if they had had any concerns regarding mail acceptance. The resident noted that they receive items via the mail monthly that contain items like mouth wash and disposable pads. R701 noted that in early September 2024, a package was delivered to the facility with their name on it. The box was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is pertains to intake MI00147430. Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify appropriate discipline wound physician/practitioner and implement and update interventions for one (R704) resident of one resident reviewed for pressure injuries. Findings Include: On 11/12/24 at 9:30 AM, the Complainant was interviewed via phone called and stated that residents are not being turned every two hours as they should, because they are short staffed and are contracting bad wounds because of the lack support on the midnight shift. The Complainant was then asked could they provide a specific resident who had been affected by the lack of staffing and stated R704 is someone who had been affected. A review of the medical record revealed that R704 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of type two diabetes, sleep apnea, and muscle wasting and dystrophy. R704's most recent Brief interview for mental status score was a 3, indicating impaired cognition. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes #MI00146313 and MI00146302 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident resulting in R501 hitting R502 in the head out of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A facility reported incident (FRI) was submitted to the State Agency (SA) that documented on 6/30/24, R502 entered R501's room and when R502 would not leave, R501 hit R502 on the head/face causing redness. A review of the facility's Incident report documented, in part, the following: .Summary of incident: On 6/30/24, (R502) entered (R501)'s room. (R501) asked (R502) to leave (R501) hit him on his head .(R501): He came into the room. I didn't want him to take anything and asked him to leave. He wouldn't leave so I hit him on the side of the head. He was standing at the end of the bed. He hollered out, and the nurse came down .Nurse K interview statement: (R502) went into (R501)'s room. I heard shouting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice #1-This citation pertains to Intake MI00146302 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a likely accidental opioid ingestion for one (R503) of three residents reviewed for narcotic medications. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged in part that R503 does not take any narcotic medications, but on 6/23/26, R503 was found unresponsive and EMS (emergency medical services) administered Narcan (opioid reversal agent) and then R503 became responsive. Review of a National Institute on Health (NIH) article titled, Naloxone (Narcan) DrugFacts dated January 2022 read in part, .Naloxone is a medicine that rapidly reverses an opioid overdose. It is an opioid antagonist. This means that it attaches to opioid receptors and reverses and blocks the effects of other opioids . But, naloxone has no effect on someone who does not have opioid in their system . On 8/27/24 at 9:01 AM, R503's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00146302 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urine drug test was collected per physician orders for one (R503) of three residents reviewed for narcotic medications. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged in part that R503 does not take any narcotic medications, but on 6/23/26, R503 was found unresponsive and EMS (emergency medical services) administered Narcan (opioid reversal agent) and then R503 became responsive. Review of a National Institute on Health (NIH) article titled, Naloxone (Narcan) DrugFacts dated January 2022 read in part, .Naloxone is a medicine that rapidly reverses an opioid overdose. It is an opioid antagonist. This means that it attaches to opioid receptors and reverses and blocks the effects of other opioids . But, naloxone has no effect on someone who does not have opioid in their system . On 8/27/24 at 9:01 AM, R503's Guardian was interviewed by phone and asked what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the dish machine for adequate sanitization, and failed to maintain the ice machines in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 12/19/23 between 8:40 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM), the following items were observed: The ice machine in the main kitchen was observed with an accumulation of dust on the side ventilation slats. The ice machine located in the [NAME] garden dining room was observed with a black mold-like substance on the drip tray. When queried regarding who was responsible for cleaning the ice machines, DM stated the kitchen staff cleans the outside of the ice machine in the kitchen, and housekeeping cleans the outside of the ice machine in the dining room. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils, .(C) Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program and to ensure accurate monitoring and documentation of appropriate antibiotic use, with potential to affect all residents in the facility, and resulting in the potential for misuse of antibiotics and development of antibiotic resistance. Findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control binder revealed that the line listing grid did not include information on whether criteria for antibiotic use was met. No documentation provided for each month included in the binder which covered January 2023 through November 2023. On 12/20/23 at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was queried regarding documentation of use of McGeer's criteria and whether or not they could show where that was documented in the facility's binder or in the electronic health record (EHR). On 12/21/23 at 10:50 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON reported that the Infection Prevention program consisted of an Infection Preventionist (Nurse A), with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment timely for four (R8, R29, R49, R69 ) of 10 reviewed for timely assessments. Findings include: Review of the triggered resident assessment task identified there were 10 resident MDS assessments noted as having an MDS record over 120 days, which meant they were either not completed and/or submitted as required. Review of the incomplete comprehensive MDS assessments included: R8 The annual MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/13/23 had a current status that read In Progress. Sections A, F, GG, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, and V were highlighted in red and/or yellow and showed as In Progress (incomplete). The previously completed/submitted MDS assessment had an ARD of 8/15/23. R29 The annual MDS with an ARD of 11/13/23 had a current status that read, In Progress. Sections A, B, C, D, E, F, GG, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, Q ,and V were highlighted in red and/or yellow and showed as In Progress. The previously completed/submitted MDS assessment had an ARD of 8/15/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment timely for six (R17, R40, R47, R57, R67, and R93) of 10 reviewed for timely assessments. Findings include: Review of the triggered resident assessment task identified there were 10 resident MDS assessments noted as having an MDS record over 120 days, which meant they were either not completed and/or submitted as required. Review of the incomplete quarterly MDS assessments included: R17 The quarterly MDS with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/10/23 had a current status as Export Ready. The history section read, Batch Status .Assessment was never added to a batch . The previously completed MDS assessment had an ARD of 8/10/23. R40 The quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/11/23 had a current status as In Progress. Sections A, GG, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, and P were highlighted in red and showed as In Progress. The previously completed MDS assessment had an ARD of 8/11/23. R47 The quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/12/23 had a current status as In Progress. Sections A, GG, H,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted to CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid) timely for ten (R8, R17, R29, R40, R47, R49, R57, R67, R69, and R93) of ten residents reviewed during the Resident Assessment review. Findings include: Review of the triggered resident assessment task identified there were 10 resident MDS assessments noted as having an MDS record over 120 days, which meant they were either not completed and/or submitted as required. Review of these MDS assessments included: R8 The annual MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/13/23 had a current status that read In Progress. Sections A, F, GG, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, and V were highlighted in red and/or yellow and showed as In Progress (incomplete). The previously completed/submitted MDS assessment had an ARD of 8/15/23. R17 The quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/10/23 had a current status as Export Ready. The history section read, Batch Status .Assessment was never added to a batch . The previously completed MDS assessment had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and handle medications in accordance with acceptable pharmaceutical standards of practice: 1.) for four of four(4 of 4) medication rooms 2.) ensure medication refrigerator temperatures outside of acceptable parameters were addressed; 3.) ensure Hall A medication cart was secured and locked when unattended; 4.) ensure medications were not expired in D unit medication (med) storage room; and 5.) the freezers in the med room were maintained regularly without ice build-up, resulting in the potential for contamination of medications, incorrect administration of medications, a lack of therapeutic benefits necessary to promote healing for residents, increased potential for adverse effects, and resident, staff or visitor access to unsecured medication cart. Findings Include: On [DATE] at 11:54 PM, during an observation tour of the med storage room in C Unit, it was observed that the Refrigerator #1 storing medications had a temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, (based on the reasonable person standard), the facility failed to ensure two residents (R49 and R59) of five residents reviewed for dignity, were treated in a dignified manner during dining. Findings include: On 12/21/23 at approximately 8:25 a.m., during a dining observation of the assisted dining room, six residents were observed eating the breakfast meal with cafeteria style trays underneath their plates. R49 and R59 were observed to each be seated at separate tables with with clothing protectors on and watching the other residents in the room eat their breakfast meals. On 12/21/23 at approximately 8:37 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant H (CNA H) was queried why R49 and R59 had not been served the breakfast meal and were still waiting to eat. CNA H reported out loud in the dining room that R49 and R59 were feeders and that they both had to wait because there were not enough staff to help them eat and they needed assistance. Further observation of the residents in the dining room, revealed six residents that were served their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Resident's personal preference for care was honored for one (R26) of one resident reviewed for self-determination/choices. Findings include: On 12/19/23 at 12:19 PM, an interview was completed with R26. When asked about whether they had any concerns about the care they received, R26 reported they did have a concern with an aide that worked with them last night on the midnight shift. R26 reported they had complained to administration about this aide a couple of times before and had requested to not have them assigned to care for them. R26 further reported this initial incident with this aide was about two or two and half months ago and had concerns with how the aide talked to them and felt it was rough at times and that they slept most of the night while working and their perception was when they came in to answer their call light, it's like they don't want to work. When asked what administration told them to address their concern at that time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement effective pressure ulcer interventions for one Resident (R34) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the worsening of a facility-acquired pressure ulcer, infection, and hospitalization. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed R34 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization related to sepsis (serious condition when the body responds improperly to an infection) as a result from a stage four (full thickness skin and tissue loss) medial sacral (lower back, end of spine) pressure ulcer with osteomyelitis (infection in the bone). Further review of the record revealed that R34 had the following diagnoses: seizures, multiple strokes, left sided paralysis, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (impaired understanding of language as well as reading and writing), gastrostomy tube, and dementia Further review revealed that R34 was bedbound, nonverbal, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of weights for one resident (R1) of four residents reviewed for nutrition/weight loss, resulting in the potential for continued unidentified weight loss and implementation of timely dietary interventions. Findings include: On 12/19/23 at approximately 9:50 a.m., R1 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R1 was observed to be thin/frail. On 12/20/23 the medical record for R1 was reviewed and revealed the following: R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia. A review of R1's careplan revealed the following: Focus-Potential for alteration in nutrition r/t (related to): [R91] was admitted to facility on a level 1 puree diet with large portions and 1:1 assist needed. [R91] has a dx (diagnosis) of Dementia, hyperlipidemia, encephalopathy, dysphagia, depressive d/o (disorder) and convulsions. PO (by mouth) intake good per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and routinely change the dressing for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC-a long, thin tube inserted through a vein in the arm) for one resident (R106) of one resident reviewed for vascular access. Findings include: On 12/29/23 at approximately 9:26 AM, R106 was observed lying in bed. The resident had a PICC in the right arm connected to a bag for TPN (Total Parenteral Nutrition-a high risk pharmaceutical nutritional preparation containing high concentration of vitamins, electrolytes, carbohydrates etc). The transparent dressing over the insertion site was dated 12/11/23. R106, who was alert and able to answer questions asked, was asked about care provided for their PICC line and other concerns. R106 reported that they have had significant digestive issues since they were a child including several surgeries. They had utilized a feeding tube, but it caused several problems They currently were receiving TPN via the PICC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REFER TO INTAKE # MI00141500 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% when two (2) medication errors were observed from a total of 26 opportunities, affecting two (Resident #65 and Resident #562) of eight residents observed for medication administration, resulting in an error rate of 7.69%. Findings include: On 12/19/23 at 4:37 PM, Nurse X was observed for Resident #65's (R65) medication administration. The medications scheduled to be given at 5:00 PM were administered, and a blood sugar check (accucheck) was performed by Nurse X. The result of the accucheck was 153, and the nurse explained to R65 that since the result of the accucheck was 153, R65 would be receiving two (2) units of insulin. Nurse X then prepared the insulin pen and set it to 2 units ready to inject. Nurse X then asked which site R65 would prefer. The arm or tummy? R65 started removing the sleeve of their sweater. R65 then expressed confusion about the insulin they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00135477. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to operationalize their abuse policy to protect residents during an investigation of abuse for one (R804) of four residents reviewed for abuse and residents assigned to the alleged perpetrator. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency in March 2023 revealed an allegation that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 'R' had a verbal altercation with resident (R804), she came at her, other staff told (CNA 'R') to get out but she didn't get out and when she did leave she came back in and stood next to the resident yelling at her. On 10/4/23 at 9:37 AM, R804 was observed lying in bed. When queried about any concerns with staff, R804 reported they were mistreated by CNA 'R' a few months ago. When queried about what happened, R804 explained they (the resident) made a sarcastic comment to CNA 'R' when they collected their meal tray because they remove them quickly which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00135477. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse and misappropriation of property to the State Agency for one (R804) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency in March 2023 revealed an allegation that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 'R' had a verbal altercation with resident (R804), she came at her, other staff told (CNA 'R') to get out but she didn't get out and when she did leave she came back in and stood next to the resident yelling at her. On 10/4/23 at 9:37 AM, R804 was observed lying in bed. When queried about any concerns with staff, R804 reported they were mistreated by CNA 'R' a few months ago. When queried about what happened, R804 explained they (the resident) made a sarcastic comment to CNA 'R' when they collected their meal tray because they remove them quickly which ended in a verbal argument. R804 reported they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements (DPS). DPS #1 This citation pertains to intake number(s): MI00136651. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were physicians orders for a intrathecal baclofen pump (a device that delivers baclofen, a medication used to treat muscle spasms, directly into the spinal canal. It is surgically placed under the skin of the abdominal region of the body. Attached to the pump is a tiny catheter that extends into the spinal canal) that included instructions for maintenance and monitoring of the pump site for one (R803) of two residents reviewed for skin management. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that on 5/17/23 when R803 was seen by an outside doctor, it was noted that R803 had a baclofen pump with a band-aid over the pump site. The complainant alleged the band-aid was not dated and appeared to be old and dirty and that the residents care is being neglected at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00137760. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to transfer two (R802 and R801) of three residents reviewed for accidents, in a safe manner, resulting in R802 falling in the shower. Findings include: R802 Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that R802 fell on the floor during a transfer into the wheelchair during a shower on 6/8/23. On 10/4/23 at 9:05 AM, R802 was observed seated on the edge of their bed, eating breakfast. R802 repeatedly leaned over and pointed to a bag of sodas located on the floor. When queried about any falls R802 had in the shower, R802 talked non-sensically and stated, Lies! R802 was unable to answer questions directly and clearly. Review of R802's clinical record revealed R802 was admitted into the facility on 9/20/21 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: osteoarthritis of left hip, dementia, history of a right foot fracture, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake number(s): MI00134971. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order for oxygen, ensure application of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine according to physician's orders, and ensure a physician ordered sleep study was completed for one (R805) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Oxygen Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that the facility was not putting him on his CPAP machine that he required for sleep apnea. On 10/4/23 at 12:00 PM, R805 was observed sleeping in bed. R805 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set for three liters per minute (3 LPM/ leader per minute) of oxygen. On 10/5/23 at 12:15 PM, R805 was observed lying in bed awake. R805 did not verbally respond when spoken to, but made some eye contact. R805's oxygen concentrator was running and set to 3 LPM. The nasal cannula was observed out of R805's nostrils and was to the right side of the nose. At that time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$67,496 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $67,496 — penalty dated 2023-12-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-25 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KHAN, ANIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2008 |
| QAZI, MOHAMMAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2008 |
| CIENA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235529. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.