Hartford Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 20.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 48% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 170.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00151498. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize a two-person assist while turning and reposition a resident while performing care for one resident (R903) of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in a fall with injury. R903 sustained a right hip fracture that required surgical repair. Findings include: Review of an allegation received through the State Agency revealed the following: (R903) has a history of stroke and is paralyzed from the waist down. (R903) has been in a nursing/rehab facility for the past two years . On or about 3/21/25, (R903) brief was being changed by an employee, and (R903) fell out of the bed. (R903) was left on the floor for an unknown period of time and was yelling for help when the staff member ran out of the room to get help. (R903) fell when (R903) was being turned over to change, but it is believed there was only one staff member present when she was being changed, and (R903) should have two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings Include:On 1/27/2026 at 9:59 AM, observation of the walk-in cooler found an increased accumulation of black spotted debris on the top surfaces of the hard plastic shelving used to store food product. When asked how often the storage shelves get cleaned, Dietary Manager (DM) F stated they get power washed, but it's been so cold we have not been able to take them outside.On 1/27/2026 at 10:19 AM, an interview with DM F found that the clean utensil bin is cleaned weekly. Observation inside of the bin found an assortment of clean utensils stored among food crumbs and debris. Upon wiping the inside of the bin, it was found to be greasy. DM F stated that they will get it cleaned. On 1/27/2026 at 10:21 AM, an interview with DM F found that the tabletop slicer is used once or so a week to slice meat. When asked what the plastic cover over the slicer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility.Findings include:On 1/27/26 at 10:25 AM observation of the kitchen serving room revealed a possible stagnant water line coming from the hand sink area down the wall near the steam tables. An interview with the Maintenance Director (MD) H found that he was unaware of the water line. An interview with the Dietary Manager G found she was unaware of what the water line was for and stated it was not something that kitchen staff use.On 1/27/26 at 1:11 PM observation of the Homebound unit soiled linen room revealed the hopper had brownish yellow water coming from the hot and cold-water fixtures on the over hopper faucet. Further observation found discolored water coming from the hopper sprayer.On 1/27/26 at 1:35…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living, affecting all residents.Findings include: On 1/27/26 starting at 1:17 PM, an environmental tour was conducted in the homebound unit with the following observations:The faucet in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with only a pencil thin stream of hot water when in use. The faucet was loose to mount and was able to be moved around. The shower room found eight razors stacked on the sink basin. Further observation revealed spots of black accumulation on underside of the shower bed mat, and a wet washcloth on the floor.An observation of the janitor closet revealed that a chemical pre-dispensing system was in place and that staff leave the faucet on when not in use. This set up puts undue back pressure on the faucets internal atmospheric vacuum breaker (AVB) of which will ruin the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2720882.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to pass water in a timely manner to ensure adequate hydration for five residents (R94, R76, R18, R156, and R33) of seven residents reviewed for hydration, resulting in the potential for increased risk for dehydration.Findings include:During the initial screening process on 1/27/2026 between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. multiple residents were observed with no water in their rooms or at bedside. These residents are as follows:R94.R94 was observed to be alert and was able to be interviewed. During an interview, R94 said there was no fresh water passed by the staff since about nine P.M. on the midnight shift. R94 pointed to a small, iced tea bottle and stated, I am glad I kept this tea bottle so I can get me some water out of the sink. I don't understand why they have not passed fresh water yet.According to the electronic medical record (EMR), R94 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intakes 2656662 and 2661216Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures in two of two records reviewed, resulting in decreased food consumption and potential nutritional decline.Findings Include:It was reported to the State Agency that food served to the residents was not at palatable temperatures.On 1/27/2025 at 11:57 AM, an interview with Dietary Manager F found that the facility has heated bases, but they are not in use for today's meal. Further observation found plates between 75F-85F with no visible plate warmer being utilized. When asked what she expects for hot food on the steam table, DM F stated that it should be at least 150F so that residents can get their food at 135F or higher.On 1/27/2025 at 12:09 PM, a regular test tray was plated and placed as one of the first meals on the C unit cart. On 1/27/2025 at 12:20 PM, the meal cart arrived on C unit with roughly 25 meal trays present. On 1/27/2025 at 12:37 PM, all trays were delivered, and the test tray was back in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to give information for Advance Medical Directives (AMD, the written instruction relating to the provision of health care) to one (R2) of two residents or their representatives reviewed for code status, resulting in R2's code status being changed to a full code (all possible life saving measures will be provided if the person's heart stops or they stop breathing).Findings include: On [DATE] at 2:30 PM, R2 was observed up in recliner chair watching TV. R2 was unable to be interviewed due to cognition status. On [DATE] at 2:50 PM, during interview with R2's Representative (RR1) they said they were not being included in decision making for R2. RR1 said they were not R2's Legal Guardian (LG) at this time and was currently trying to obtain it through the court system. RR1 said they did not know R2's code status had been changed to a 'full code' by the facility. According to R2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) RR1 was identified as R2's emergency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (R173) of three residents reviewed for MDS assessment transmittal requirements.Findings include:During the MDS Assessment task R173 was identified to have a MDS assessment that was due over 120 days. On 1/28/26 a review of R173's Electronic Heath Record (EHR) revealed R173 discharged from the facility on 8/27/25. The MDS assessment for discharge status had not been transmitted to the CMS system at this time. On 1/28/2026 at 11:06 AM, during an interview with MDS coordinator (staff Q) R173's EHR was reviewed. Staff Q stated, We did not transmit the MDS yet. It's late. I will send it today. Staff Q said that the facility had undergone staff changes and some transmittals had been missed. On 1/29/26 at 2:10 PM the Nursing Home Administrator said the expectation is that MDS assessments will be sent timely in accordance with the federal regulations.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two (R2 and R4) of three residents reviewed for MDS assessments. Findings include:R2 According to R2's MDS assessment dated [DATE] section P, R2 used a limb restraint less than daily. Review of R2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not reveal any orders, care plans, or documentation to support R2 used a limb restraint. 01/27/2026 11:06 AM R2 was observed lying in bed on left side using wedge bolster. There were no visible restraints on R2. There were no restraint devices in R2's room. At 2:30 PM R2 was observed up in recliner chair. There were no visible restraints on R2 or in the room. R2 was unable to be interviewed due to cognition status. At approximately 2:35 PM unit manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) R was asked if there were any restraints in the facility. LPN R stated, There are no restraints in the facility. We do not use them. LPN R confirmed that R2 had never had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to refer one (R158) of two residents reviewed, with a serious mental disorder, to the state designated authority for review of the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program. This resulted in the likelihood of decline related to unidentified needs. Findings include: Record Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed no Level II PASARR completed by the facility since R158's admittance date on 8/1/25. On 01/27/2026 at 11:39 A.M., R158 was interviewed and reported that he does not receive behavior or psychiatric supports at this facility. On 01/27/2026 at 2:20 P.M., R158's record review revealed a diagnosis of PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA with no evidence of a Level II PASARR. Review of a Level I PASARR dated 8/1/25 which was completed by the referring hospital which denoted the following: a diagnosis of Schizophrenia, a history of previous mental health treatment and the routine prescription of the antipsychotic medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for medication administration for one resident (R183) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:On 01/27/2026, at approximately 10:05 AM, R183 was observed in their room. Three pills in a medication cup were observed on R183's bedside table. Upon inquiry, R183 said the nurse leaves them since they cannot swallow the pills all at once. R183 further said they are not sure what the pills are taken for, or what they are. A record review was completed on 1/28/2026 which revealed R183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right side, muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, depression, and insomnia. Section C of the Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/6/2026, revealed R183 scored a 15/15 on the Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI