Sheffield Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 94.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2792770. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from psychosocial harm for one resident (R102) of three residents reviewed for abuse by Social Worker B. Findings include:On 02/16/2026, an alleged resident-to-resident abuse allegation was reported to the State Agency. The alleged incident occurred on 02/15/2026. Record review revealed on 02/15/2026 at approximately 01:30 P.M., it was alleged that R102 was hit in the face by R101. Incident summary revealed: R102 was sitting in the hall when R101 rolled past in a wheelchair, stopped and hit R102 in the face. R102 screamed, the staff immediately responded. R102 and R101 were separated. Record review of progress note dated 02/15/2026 by Nurse A revealed, . R102 sitting in hallway peacefully, R101 rolling by punched this resident in the face unprovoked, on the left side. On 05/06/26 at 12:20 P.M., Nurse A was interviewed and stated, I was sitting at my desk and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 97 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include:On 2/24/2026 at 9:00 A.M. during a tour of the kitchen the air vent covers and adjacent ceiling tiles over the tray line were heavily soiled with visible dust, fuzz strings and lint. The ceiling tile strips had areas of rust and corrosion over the steam table and dish room area. The Bakers pride convection (stove) was soiled with burnt ash and food residue. Both glass doors of the convection stove were soiled with yellowish colored stains and food residue that blocked visibility into the stove. The window panels and legs of the stove were soiled with splattered grease and collected food particles. The deep fat fryer needed cleaning and the grease needed changing. The grease was dark in color and had floating debris. The water drains under the three-compartment sink was soiled and discolored. The floors throughout the kitchen and dish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to utilize safe food practices, provide a safe and sanitary kitchen for food storage, preparation service affecting 90 residents, resulting in the potential for food borne illnesses.Findings include:On 2/24/26 at 8:50 A.M. during observation of the tray line the ambience room temperature exceeded 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Three of the four employees on the tray line were observed with soaked perspired uniforms and facial masks. One employee was observed perspiring profusely as sweat trickled down her face, commenting, I need some air in here. During this observation a large clear container of raw chicken was stored on the counter approximately 20 minutes. The air conditioning units for the kitchen were observed off or not working.On 2/25/26 at 8:30 A.M., during observation of the tray line a colander of diced turkey cubes were thawing in the first sink of the three-compartment sink.At 12:20 P.M. a local vendor delivered 21 (assorted boxes of food) both frozen and staple supplies were stored on the floor without a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat one (R72) of three residents reviewed for resident rights, with dignity and respect during incontinence and routine activities of daily living care resulting in mistrust and discomfort, with the potential for mistreatment.Findings include:On 2/26/2026 at 11:30 a.m. R72 was observed in the hall, going to an activity, and wanted the interview to be held at the nurse's station. R72 was alert, oriented to person, place, and situation, and able to recall the incident that was alleged on 12/17/25. R72 said CNA D became upset because she needed to be changed. R72 stated, (CNA D) said why did you wait so long to be changed. You're always doing this. While we were in the bathroom, and I was on the toilet, she tossed the brief at me. I got mad because the aide (CNA D) had been good to me before this. What she did to me hurt my feelings, so I started to curse at her (CNA D). Although the aid apologized and I accepted it, I still didn't have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the timely reporting to the state agency suspicion of a sexually transmitted disease for one vulnerable resident (R64) of three residents reviewed for abuse.Findings include:A review of R64's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Vascular Dementia with Agitation, Depressive disorder, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of R64's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) disclosed a score of 00 (score of 00 indicates severe cognitive impairment).A review of R64's diagnosis list did not note a Herpes virus diagnosis nor a review of R64's previous medical record from another facility.Registered Nurse (RN H) documented the following on 8/15/25 at 3:00 PM: Resident (R64) with white bumps on her vaginal labia (skin folds (inner and outer lips) surrounding the vaginal opening), multiple whitish raised bumps. Labia appeared swollen. No…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate the suspicion of a sexually transmitted disease for one vulnerable resident (R64) of three residents reviewed for abuse.Findings include:On 02/24/2026 at 11:30 AM, R64 was observed in bed, wearing a gown, with their eyes closed. R64 did not respond to name being called.A review of R64's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Vascular Dementia with Agitation, Depressive disorder, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of R64's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) disclosed a score of 00 (score of 00 indicates severe cognitive impairment). There was no diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 or 2.A review of R64's Care plan revealed the following: Focus Goal Interventions: (R64) is at risk for impaired skin integrity/pressure injury R/T (related to): Incontinence and debility Date Initiated: 10/30/2024 Created on: 10/30/2024. There was no update to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bottle of hydrogen peroxide was not stored at bedside for one resident (R29) out of three residents reviewed for accidents.Findings include: On 2/24/2026 at 10:10 AM, a bottle of hydrogen peroxide was observed from R29's doorway stored on a bedside table in front of a container with R29's name written on it. When R29 was asked about the bottle, R29 said the bottle was hers but could not state the reason for the hydrogen peroxide. R29 was observed in a wheelchair and was able to self-propel and able to reach for items on her bedside table. R29 was alert and oriented times two and was difficult to understand.On 2/25/2026 at 9:00 AM, a bottle of hydrogen peroxide was observed on R29's bedside table.On 2/25/2026 at 9:15 AM, Registered Nurse E was observed entering R29's room and made R29's bed.On 2/25/2026 at 9:37 AM, a bottle of hydrogen peroxide was observed on R29's bedside table with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F. LPN F was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supportive personnel to consistently maintain the sanitation in the kitchen and ensure food safety practices were performed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 90 of the 96 residents that consumed meals from the kitchen.Findings include:On 2/25/at 12:25 P.M. during observation of the sanitation in the kitchen Dietary Manager (DM) I stated, I am only budgeted for 9 employees a day Monday through Friday, that includes (Fine Dining for lunch), I cannot do any overtime. DM I was queried concerning the exact number of hours each employee worked a day. The manager explained about three weeks ago, an employee (stock person) had to be let go. DM I explained the stock person helped with the cleaning of the kitchen equipment, rotated stock and ensured the floors were cleaned and other things in the kitchen. Since that employee's vacancy all the staff, including the Dietary Manager, pitch in to complete the tasks normally performed by the stock person. DM I added that any further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program, encompassing outcome and process surveillance, accurate data collection/documentation/analysis, resulting in a lack of accurate and comprehensive infection control tracking, surveillance and data monitoring/analysis for one (R64) of six residents reviewed for infection control. Findings include:On 02/24/2026 at 11:30 AM, R64 was observed in bed, wearing a gown, with their eyes closed. R64 did not respond to name called.A review of R64's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Vascular Dementia with Agitation, Depressive disorder, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of R64's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) disclosed a score of 00 (score of 00 indicates severe cognitive impairment).A review of R64's Care plan revealed the following:Observe skin with showers/care. Notify nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Antibiotic Stewardship program when protocols for appropriate antibiotic administration were not implemented and infection criteria was not met for thre residents (R3, R60, and R71.) This had the ability to affect residents that were prescribed and administered antibiotics while residing at the facility. Findings include: On 1/23/25 at 11:23 AM the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program was reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON said that the facility had recently hired an Infection Control Nurse, Registered Nurse (RN) E but RN E was not in the facility at the time of infection control program review. The DON said she is an Infection Preventionist and had been responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention Program including Antibiotic Stewardship prior to the hiring of RN E. The facility's Infection Prevention Program was reviewed and indicated that the facility follows McGeer's Criteria (a surveillance tool used to ensure definitive criteria has been met to identify true…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- personal protective equipment used to prevent the spread of infections) were worn during the administration of medications via a gastric tube for one resident (R6) out of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. Findings include: On 1/22/25 at 8:55 AM, signage was observed on R6's door reminding staff that EBP should be worn when providing care. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D was observed entering R6's room to administer medications via the resident's gastric tube. LPN D did not apply a gown before administering medications. Review of R6's electronic medical record (EMR) documented an original admission into the facility on 2/6/19 with a pertinent diagnosis of gastrostomy status (gastric tube). Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R6 required substantial/maximal assistance with most Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Review of Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI