Fenton Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 66.7 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Tis citation pertains to Intake Number 2972860.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a medication, as ordered, for one resident (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings Include:Resident #4:A record review of the Face sheet and progress notes for Resident #4 indicated admission to the facility on 3/25/2026 with diagnoses: Respiratory failure, myelodysplastic syndrome, stem cell transplant, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hypomagnesemia, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, depression, hypothyroidism, gout, and deep vein thrombosis. Resident #4 discharged to home on 4/4/2026.A review of the physician orders for Resident #4 identified the following: MG (magnesium) Plus Protein Oral Tablet 133 MG (Specialty Vitamins Product), Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement, start date 3/26/2026 and discontinued date 4/4/2026.A review of the Hospital discharge orders indicated Resident #4 received Magnesium medications including MG Plus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing, resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility.Findings include: On 12/02/2025 at 1:15pm during the environmental tour with the Environmental Services Director I, the Environmental Services Director I tested the chlorine residual at the staff bathroom sink on the first floor and the result was undetectable on the [NAME] K-2005 chlorine test kit. The testing kit measures chlorine residual from 1 to 10 parts per million (ppm). The test kit is primarily designed to test for chlorine in swimming pools, not drinking water. When interviewed on whether there's another test kit they've been using to measure the chlorine residual since the chlorine logs have results below 1 ppm and the Environmental Services Director I answered no. On 12/02/2025 at 2:17pm during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the advance directive status was ordered, signed by the physician, and posted in the resident's clinical record per facility policy for one resident [Resident #80 (R80)] of 5 residents reviewed for advance directives.Findings include:Resident #80 (R80)R80 was observed in her room' lying in bed on [DATE] at 11:5 am. When R80 was asked about the life vest she was wearing, R80 explained it was to monitor her heart. A review of the Electronic Medical Record revealed that R80 was [AGE] years old, admitted at the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation (NSTEMI) Myocardial Infarction, Ischemic Cardiomyopathy, Right Bundle Branch Block, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Pleural Effusion, and Heart Failure in addition to other diagnoses. A review of R80's clinical record revealed that there was no Code Status specified in the Advance Directive section in the chart. Although a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen humidification was provided, physician's orders for oxygen were followed and nebulizer equipment was stored according to facility policy for two residents (#51 and #69) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Resident #51A review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 7/20/22 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia. On 12/2/25 at 2:05 PM, an observation was made of Resident #51 lying in bed. The Resident was interviewed, was able to answer some questions but did not engage in conversation. An observation was made of a nebulizer and mask on top of the bedside table. The nebulizer was stored in a see-through bag, and the medication chamber was observed to have liquid inside the chamber. The nebulizer was not dried prior to being stored in the bag. The Resident indicated use of the nebulizer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00148563. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property by facility staff for one resident (Resident #701) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) intake documentation dated as initially received on 11/19/24 revealed the facility was notified on 11/19/24 at approximately 1:40 PM by Family Member Witness D of fraudulent charges on Resident #701's credit card. The facility submitted documentation detailing that the allegation was substantiated by the facility. An interview was completed with the facility Administrator on 3/19/25 at 9:30 AM. When asked if they had substantiated the allegations in the FRI involving Resident #701, the Administrator replied, Yes. The Administrator was asked what happened and verbalized that Resident #701's family member came to their office and informed them there was some unusual activity on Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REFER TO INTAKE NUMBER: MI00147356 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate skin care interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers and promote healing consistent with professional standards for three residents (R301, R302, and R304) of four sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in delay in treatment and healing and potential for worsening of wound, infection and further complications. Findings include: Resident 301(R301): R301 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, and Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral Region in addition to other diagnoses. On 9/12/2024, R301 was discharged to the nearby acute care hospital to evaluate and treat the wounds. R301 did not return to the facility after discharge to the urgent care on 9/12/2024. A review of R301's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated in July,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and safe environment for 11 residents' rooms, 2 main hallways, and 1 residential sitting area, resulting in the likelihood for resident injury (bug and spider bites and hand splinters), anger and frustration from family members and residents, and cross contamination with illnesses with increased use of antibiotics. Findings Include: During an environmental walk through done on 10/2/24 starting at 8:16 a.m., accompanied by Director of Maintenance, Housekeeping and Laundry D; the following concerns were observed: First Floor: -At 8:16 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER], the oxygen tubing with nasal cannula was observed on the floor (not in a bag) next to his bed. The resident had no idea where his oxygen was. -room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom toilet had BM on the back of the seat and the floor was found dirty. -At 8:30 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER], the window running air conditioner filter was found to have an excessive amount of dust and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received assistance with showering and shaving for one resident (Resident #20) and failed to use appropriate hand hygiene during ADL (activities of daily living) care for Resident #265, of five residents reviewed for ADL care and 3 of 5 confidential group of residents voicing concern of not receiving bathing activity, resulting in the potential for embarrassment, frustration, needs not meet, infection and lack of feelings of self-worth. Findings include: Resident #20: A review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 3/12/24 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, limitations of activities due to disability, lung cancer, muscle weakness, dementia, disorientation, and need for assistance with personal care. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 7/15 that indicated moderately impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure a safe environment with adequate supervision and implement interventions to prevent a fall for three residents (Resident #2, Resident #53 and Resident #54) and failed to do a complete fall investigation for those three residents and 2) Failed to ensure that Resident #212 had their C-collar (Cervical collar or brace used to support the neck and spinal cord, often used for neck pain, spinal fractures, surgery recovery or trauma) on while out of bed as ordered by the physician of 7 residents reviewed for falls and accident hazards, resulting in potential for pain and decline in medical condition and the likelihood of repeated fall with serious injury to occur due to incomplete investigations for R2, R53 and R54 and the potential for pain or worsening/decline in medical condition for Resident #212. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2): Accidents According to the review of the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) on 10/2/24 at 3:00 PM, R2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen and food preparation equipment in a sanitary condition and ensure clean and ready-for-use kitchen equipment was air dried properly, resulting in an increased potential for food borne illness, potentially affecting 60 residents of a census of 62 residents who consume oral nutrition from the facility kitchen. Findings Include: Review of the U.S. Public Health Service 2009 Food Code, as adopted by the Michigan Food Law, effective October 1, 2012, directs those physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean, food equipment was to be dried in a manner that leaves no water left inside prior to storage, and ready-to-eat foods shall be clearly marked at the time the original container is open if held for more than 24 hours. Observation was done on 10/1/24 at 10:06 a.m., accompanied by Dietary Manager/RD E. The following were observed during the initial kitchen tour done on 10/1/24: -At 10:07 a.m., the large can opener had an excessive amount of dried on food and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $793K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI