Regency at Grand Blanc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 663 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 294 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 129.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.15 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.33 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Intake Numbers: MI00151742 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1.) provide services to prevent the development of new pressure ulcers consistent with professional standards, 2.) provide the appropriate skin care interventions to promote healing for two sampled residents (R304 and R306) of five residents reviewed with pressure ulcers, resulting in the development of avoidable pressure ulcer, delay in treatment and healing and potential for wound infection, pain, and complications. Findings include: Resident# 304 (R304) During the initial interview on 4/16/25 at 1:56 PM, R304 revealed he had recently developed a wound at the facility and stated he was not turned by staff as frequently as he should have been. According to the Record review conducted on 4/16/25 at 3:30 PM, R304 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of spinal stenosis at the lumbar region without neurogenic claudication and had surgical fusion of the spine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for one resident (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall from bed.Findings include:This citation pertains to intakes 2971486 and 2985660.Resident #3 (R3):R3 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include rheumatoid arthritis, morbid obesity, inability to ambulate and primary generalized osteoarthritis.On 4/6/26 at 10:30AM, record review was conducted of a fall report from 03/26/26. On 03/26/26 at 14:00PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C was providing care to R3 without the assistance of an additional staff member. CNA C rolled R3 away from and R3 kicked her right leg over the side of the bed, causing R3 to roll from the bed on to the floor. There was bruising noted to the right knee, ice was applied, the physician, responsible party and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the fall. X-rays of the right knee were ordered on 3/26/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number 2697789.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete thorough respiratory assessments for one resident (Resident #1) and establish a completed oxygen order for one resident (Resident #2). Findings Include:Resident #1:On 1/2/2026 at approximately 12:20 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #1's daughter. She stated her mother admitted to the facility for strengthening after she fractured her tibia and fibula, while at the facility it was discovered she had pneumonia and utilized oxygen daily. Concern was expressed that as Resident #1's time at the facility progressed, she required increased oxygen supplementation. In addition, the two antibiotic courses did not appear to be effectively treating her pneumonia. When Resident #1 began the second antibiotic the facility was unable to get her breathing under control and her oxygen was consistently being increased to 4 Liters or higher. She stated they believe there was delay in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five residents' (#1,#7, #13, #37 and #42) wheelchairs/Amigos were regularly cleaned, sanitized and free from damaged areas of six reviewed for a homelike environment. Findings Include: During Resident Council held on 6/11/2025 at 10:20 AM, five residents' wheelchairs or amigos were observed to have packed substances in the crevices, worn cushions, and varying areas of dried on substances. When asked if their wheelchairs were cleaned on a regular basis, they stated they were not. None could recall when the last time their wheelchair had been cleaned. Review was completed of Resident #1, #7, #13, #37 and #42's wheelchair cleaning task log for the last 30 days. The documentation indicated their wheelchairs were being cleaned weekly, but observations made indicated they were not being consistently cleaned. The following was documented: Resident #1: Wheelchair was last cleaned on 6/5/2025. Resident #7: Wheelchair was last cleaned on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #70 On 6/10/25 at 1:13 PM, an interview was completed with Resident # 70 in their room. The Resident was sitting up in their bed with the overbed tray positioned over the bed in front of them. A nebulizer machine was present on the dresser beside the bed. The nebulizer mask was sitting directly on the top of the dresser and was not contained. There was visible fluid in the medication cup chamber of the nebulizer mask. Record review revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and colostomy (surgically created opening in the abdomen allowing for the passage of stool into an external bag). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact and required moderate to substantial assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with the exception of set-up assistance for eating and oral hygiene. Review of Resident #70's care plans in the Electronic Medical Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Maintain food preparation and kitchen equipment in a sanitary and good working condition and 2) Maintain a clean and sanitary environment (refrigerator, microwave and floor drains), resulting in an increased potential for food borne illness, with the potential to affect all residents who consumed oral nutrition. Findings Include: On 6/10/25 at 10:28 AM, a tour of the kitchen was completed with Certified Dietary Manager D the following was identified as areas of concern: Ice Machine: Puddle of water was observed being the ice machine. The drain grate was a dark orange/brown color on the slacks. The tubing from the back of the ice machine the filter connected on the wall was riddled with visible brown colored dust spanning the length of the tubing. Microwave: The inside of the door, sides and top of the microwave were splattered with unknown food particles. Cooks Refrigerator: Both corners of the refrigerator had dried food particles and smudges in various areas on the outside and inside of the door. Cereal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity by not having the call lights accessible, extended call light response times, and not treating residents in a respectful manner for five residents (Res. #15, Res. #50, Res.#187, Res. #289, & Res.#391) of five residents reviewed for dignity and respect and call light response times, resulting in fear of abandonment, isolation and decreased socialization and the potential for falls or accidents. Findings include: Resident #15 (R15) Dignity During the initial tour on 06/10/25 at 1:11 PM, Resident #15 was observed eating popcorn in bed in his room. During the initial interview, R15 revealed that he could not see any more since he was diagnosed with Glaucoma; he is now blind. When asked if he had access to his call light, he said he would often feel around his bed to find it but could not find the call light button. During an observation on 6/10/25 at 1:12 PM, Nurse M, assigned to R15, found the call light on the floor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide advanced written notification of a room change and obtain consent for one resident (Resident #70) of one resident reviewed, resulting in a cognitively intact resident not being informed of and/or provided the rationale for a room change prior to their room being moved. Findings include: Resident #70: On 6/10/25 at 1:13 PM, an interview was completed with Resident # 70 in their room. When queried if they had been in this room since they were admitted to the facility, Resident #70 verbalized they were in a different room before. Resident #70 was queried regarding the room change and stated, I just came back, and all my stuff was gone. I was mad. When queried if they were notified of the room change and the reason for the change prior to their personal items being moved to a different room, Resident #70 stated, No. When asked where they were when their personal items were relocated, Resident #70 revealed they thought they were in therapy. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #18 (R18): Accidents On 06/12/25 at 12:34 PM, a review of R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was conducted. R18 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] under hospice care with the diagnosis of Congestive heart failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Vascular Dementia, Difficulty in Walking, weakness, and End Stage Renal Disease ESRD)in addition to other diagnoses. R18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated March 15, 2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 07/15. A score of 0-7 indicates that the individual has severe cognitive impairment. The R18's plan of care, dated 2/12/25, did not include ensuring safety and monitoring body placement in a chair or bed after the Resident's dialysis or when up on a chair unsupervised. R18 goes to dialysis treatment three (3) times a week and has a functional ability deficit requiring assistance with self-care and mobility. R18 required substantial/maximum assistance with a 2-person assist for bed mobility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to timely respond to two residents' (#28 and #47) pharmacy recommendations of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: Resident #28: On 6/13/2025 at 9:30 AM, a review was conducted of Resident #28 medical records, and it indicated she readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Major Depressive Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease. Further review was conducted and yielded the following: On 6/13/2025 at approximately 10:45 AM, a review was conducted of Resident #28's Medication Regime Reviews (MRR) from August 2024 - May 2025. The following was found: January 13, 2025: (Resident #28) receives Eliquis 5 mg BID and Aspirin Low Dose 81 mg daily. Her last HBG is noted at 8.543 on 1-3-25. Please reevaluate the continued use of their combination therapy and perhaps stop using ASA therapy . Practitioner B accepted the recommendation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures were operationalized for safe bedside medication storage for two residents (# 70 and # 81) of two residents reviewed resulting in a lack of assessment for self-administration of medications, medications stored at bedside, and lack of staff knowledge of medication administration. Findings include: Resident #70: Record review revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and colostomy (surgically created opening in the abdomen allowing for the passage of stool into an external bag). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact and required moderate to substantial assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with the exception of set-up assistance for eating and oral hygiene. On 6/10/25 at 1:13 PM, an interview was completed with Resident # 70 in their room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI