Regency at Livonia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 111.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment and monitoring following an identified weight loss for one resident (R56) of two reviewed for nutrition resulting in, weight loss and unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: On 12/17/24 at 1:00 PM, R56 was observed sitting in their room in their wheelchair. Attempts to interview R56 were occured to no avail due to their cognition. A review of R56's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Anxiety Disorder, Hypertension, and Muscle Weakness. Further review revealed a moderately impaired cognition, and was dependent for bathing and dressing. Further review of R56's care plan revealed the following: Focus: [R56] has alteration in nutritional and/or hydration status r/t (related to) CVA (Cerebral Vascular Accident), hx (history) of PCM (protein calorie malnutrition), dysphagia, therapeutic diet. Date Initiated: 12/03/2024. Interventions . Observe and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 03/01/2026 during an initial observation of the kitchen between 9:00 AM- 9:30 AM, the following items were observed: There were no paper towels in the paper towel dispenser at the handwashing sink. On 03/01/2026 at 9:45 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) K confirmed the empty paper towel dispenser. In the walk-in cooler, there was a pool of spilled milk on the floor, an opened, undated 1 gallon container of Italian Dressing, an undated container of prepared tuna salad labeled tuna, and an undated container of cut onions. On 03/01/2026 at 9:45 AM, DM K confirmed the items should be dated. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) Except when PACKAGING FOOD using a REDUCED OXYGEN PACKAGING method as specified under S 3-502.12,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, homelike environment affecting two residents (R31 and R78) of two reviewed for environment. Findings include:R31 On 03/01/26 at 9:51 AM, R31 was observed lying in bed facing the wall in their room. Areas of large white peeling paint were observed on the wall next to their bed. When asked about the peeling paint on the wall, R31 stated they didn't like it and wished it was fixed. Medical record review revealed R31 was admitted on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses of Interstitial Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety Disorder and Depressive Disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R31's Brief Interview of Mental Status assessment score was 14/15 indicating intact cognition. R78 On 3/01/26 at 10:15 AM, the veneer covered windowsill was noted to be half covered due to paint peeling which exposed a raw wooden edge. The wooden edge was splintered and had sharp areas. R78's bed was noted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a current vision care plan for one resident (R22) out of five residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include:On 03/01/26 at 10:30 AM, R22 was observed lying in the bed under the covers. When asked if they had any concerns, R22 said they had dropped the bed remote and could not see due to blindness.A review of R22's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 8/08/25 with diagnoses of Glaucoma, Legal Blindness and Hypotension. A review of R22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, R22's Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment score was a 7/15 indicating impaired cognition.Further review of R22's medical record revealed there was no vision care plan as it had been resolved on 10/5/25. On 3/03/26 at 2:00 PM, an interview with Social Worker J occurred and they were queried regarding the date the care was resolved and confirmed the care plan had been resolved accidently. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply heel protection boots for one resident (R53) out of three reviewed for care interventions. Findings include:On 3/1/2026 at 9:48 AM, R53 was observed lying in bed sleeping with their heels resting on the mattress. A pair of heel protection boots were noted to be on the dresser.A review of the medical records reviewed R53 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R53 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.Further review of the physician's orders revealed the following, Order date: 1/23/2026.Status: Active.Description: Heel lift boots while in bed.On 3/1/2026 at 11:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C. LPN C was asked if R53 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions for one resident (R11) out of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include:On 3/1/2026 at 10:49 AM, R11 was observed lying in bed, unable to answer interview questions. A purple wedge pillow that is used to assist in repositioning, was observed sitting on R11's bedside table. R11 was noted to be lying on their back, with the head of the bed lying flat.A review of the medical record revealed R11 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses, Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating the resident was unable to complete the assessment. R11 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the medical record revealed the following wound care note, .Wound #1 sacrum is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor an intravenous (IV) medication for one resident (R1) of one resident reviewed for medication monitoring. Findings include: Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 2/3/26 (Tuesday) for Vanco (Vancomycin-antibiotic) trough (lowest level of antibiotic) every Monday.fax results to Infectious Disease .The next Vanco trough was due on 2/9/26 (Monday), however a blood sample was collected on 2/10/25 (Tuesday) with the result of no sample received. The next Vanco trough was due on 2/16/26 (Monday), however a blood sample was collected on 2/18/26 (Wednesday) with the result of no sample received.Review of the clinical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Sepsis due to Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Diabetes Type 2, Congestive Heart Failure and Epilepsy. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to the Complaint Intake # 272114.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper diagnosis or clinical indication to support the insertion of an indwelling catheter for three (3) residents: Resident #501 (R501), Resident #502 (R502), and Resident #504 (R504) of 4 residents reviewed for indwelling catheter resulting in improper catheter management leading to a potential recurrent catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), sepsis and hospitalization.Findings include:Resident #501: (R501) On 1/27/26 at 12:40 PM, R501 was observed in her room lying in bed, alert and oriented. R501 expressed concerns about her catheter care. She had an indwelling catheter in place with clear-to-light-yellow urine output. The catheter tubing was patent and connected to a privacy drain bag. No signs of cloudiness, bleeding, or foul odor were observed.During an interview with R501 on 1/27/26 at 12:40 PM, she did not know why she had complained about a recent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00152501. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident showers were provided as scheduled for one resident (R701) of three reviewed for acitivites of daily (ADL) care. Findings include: On 5/7/25 at 11:00 AM, R701 was observed in bed with a hospital gown on, and with a large amount of facial hair, R701 was asked about the care at the facility. R701 explained things could be better. R701 continued and explained staff are either too busy or there is not enough staff. R701 reported they did not get out of bed the entire weekend and this was not the first time this had happened. R701 was asked if they receive their showers at minimum two times per week, R701 stated, Maybe once per week. A review of R701's medical record noted R701 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Influenza. A review of R701's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted, R701 with an intact cognition and required assistance by staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment throughout residential common areas and rehabilitation area. Findings include: On 12/18/24 at 11:20 AM, an observation of the first and second floor dining and common areas were observed with the following: sticky matter on the floors, garbage lying on the ground, two ice machine's tray with white debris on it and with the face of the ice machine dirty. Two popcorn machines were observed with the interior of the glass greasy and with moderate amounts of popcorn kernels adhered to the walls and in the basin. While making the observation of the popcorn machine, a staff member commented that it needed to cleaned. The baseboards were observed with dust, and debris. The floors were observed with a moderate amount of dried spilled matter where residents were socializing. The first and second floor windowsills were observed to be dirty and with dead insects on the sills and in the tracking of the windows. The back door was observed with insect webs, dead insects, and leaves around the perimeter of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate an activities care plan for one resident (R94) of one reviewed for care plans. Findings include: On 12/17/24 at 1:00 PM, R94 was observed sitting in their lounging chair awake, and alone in their room. Attempts to interview R94 were to no avail due to their cognition as they remained pleasantly confused. There were no activities observed in R94's room at this time. A review of R94's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Hypertension, and Muscle Weakness. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required one person assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Additional review revealed the resident had sustained multiple falls in the facility since admission. On 12/18/24 at 8:48 AM, 9:22 AM, and 12:45 PM, R94 was observed in their room without activities or stimulation. On 12/19/24 at 8:57 AM, activity logs for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI