Regency at Shelby Township

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 455 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 198 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 109.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-07-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00135903 and MI00135359. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from verbal abuse, physical abuse, and neglect from staff to resident for one of one sampled resident (R51) reviewed for abuse resulting in, abuse, neglect and the likelihood of mental anguish using the reasonable person concept. Findings include: A review of Intake called into the State Agency: MI00135903 revealed the following, (R51) had called Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA L) an '[expletive]' and [they] replied, 'no you are an [expletive]' .(R51) and (CNA L) exchanged verbal remarks back and forth and then (CNA L) slapped (R51) on (their) bare bottom and said to (them), who is your daddy? . On 7/24/23 at 10:00 AM, R51 was observed lying in bed and asked about the incident that took place on 3/13/23 between them and CNA L. R51 explained that they have problems with their memory, and did not remember the incident. A review of R51's medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2992237.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented and care provided timely for three residents (R903, R904, and R906) of seven reviewed for care plan implementation and care needs. Findings include: R906On 05/05/26 at 9:30 AM, R906 was observed laying on their back in bed. R906's legs were slightly flexed at the knees and the heels rested on the bed. A Pressure Relieving Ankle Foot Orthotic (PRAFO) boot was on an armchair to the right of the bed. R906 reported they had a wound to the left heel and needed help to put the boot on, and staff had not come in, and the boot had not been applied that morning. When asked if they could move about in the bed, the resident reported they had limited movement of the left leg. At 11:55 AM, R906's heels and the PRAFO boot were in the same position as before. The heels rested on the bed. A review of the active physician orders in the electronic medical record (EMR) documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for three residents (R56, R119 and R117) out of three reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:R56 On 9/22/2025 at 1:15 PM, R56 was observed sitting up in a wheelchair. A gauze wrap and bandage were observed on their right lower extremity (RLE). The bandage was noted to be dated 9/18/2025. A review of the medical record revealed that R56 was admitted into the facility on 5/24/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Peripheral Vascular Disease. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 which indicated an impaired cognition. R56 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the physician orders revealed an active wound care order for the right lateral lower leg that was to be changed every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday and as needed if missing or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions for pressure ulcer healing for one resident (R89) out of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include:On 9/22/2025 at 10:16 AM, R89 was observed lying in bed. Their feet were hanging off the bed, with the head of bed (HOB) flat and they were laying on their back with no positioning devices in place. A green positioning wedge was observed in the chair next to the bed.A review of the medical record revealed that R89 was admitted into the facility on 9/11/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4 (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle or bone in the ulcer) and Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R89 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.Further review of the physician orders revealed the following, Ordered: 9/11/2025.Order: Verify wedge pillow is in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and dated when opened in one of four medication carts. Findings include: On 09/22/2025 at 4:49 PM, the Spring Hill medication cart two was reviewed with Registered Nurse (RN) D. Two insulin lispro vials were not dated on the vial, for one active resident and one discharged resident, and a 100-50 MCG/ACT fluticasone-Salmeterol inhaler did not have a resident identifier, nor a date opened. On 09/24/2025 at 12:55 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the nurse should label the carton and the actual medication in case the carton is lost or damaged. A review of the identified medications on drugs.com documented: for the lispro insulin - Store the vial in a refrigerator or at room temperature and use within 28 days; and for the fluticasone/salmeterol - Write the date you opened the foil pouch in the first blank line on the label. Write the use by date in the second blank line on the label. That date is 1 month after the date you wrote in the first line.A review of the facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond to residents needs(call lights) in a timely manner for one resident (R81 and R47) and two resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) fourteen reviewed for call light response. Findings include: R81 On 9/10/24 at 9:59 AM, R81 was interviewed in their room with their daughter present and ask about the care and services they were receiving at the facility. Both R81 and their daughter indicated that call light wait times, Can be long, up to forty five minutes during the early morning and on weekends. A review of R81's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R81 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, aftercare following knee joint prosthesis and weakness. R81's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R81 had an intact cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs) other than eating and oral hygiene. On 9/12/24 at 3:15 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice proper infection control practices in a contact isolation room and properly store nebulizer/C-Pap (non-rebreather) mask for five residents (R36, R223, R221, R74, and R11) reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R36 On 9/10/2024 at 12:06 PM, the call light for R36 was seen activated. R36 was noted to be on contact precautions. A sign, as well as personal protective equipment (PPE) was observed on the door. On 9/10/2024 at 12:07 PM, Maintenance Assistant (MA) B was observed going into the room. MA B did not don/doff any PPE, nor perform hand hygiene upon exiting the room. A review of the medical record revealed R11 admitted into the facility on 9/4/2024 with the following diagnoses, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Major Depressive Disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13/15 indicating an intact cognition. R11 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. On 9/12/2024 at 9:44 AM, an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R25) was catheterized (straight cathed-tube inserted into the bladder to help drain urine) timely out of one reviewed for dignity, resulting in the potential for feelings of sadness. Findings include: On 09/11/24 at 2:27 PM, an interview with R25 occurred and R25 stated Because I am one of the youngest ones here, I try not to cause trouble. I was up by 5:00 AM and cathed for my doctor's appointment. Upon returning from the appointment at 1:00 PM, I asked the nurse to cath me again because it was hurting. I had to wait until 3:00 PM. I was really upset and sad about waiting so long to be cathed. It made me feel sad like the nurses don't care about me or how I feel. A review of R25 medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 7/23/24 with diagnoses of Scoliosis, Insomnia, Hypertension, and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder. A review of R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, R25's Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (R56) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs with a comfortable bed, resulting in feelings of dissatisfaction and discomfort. Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 2:58 PM, R56 was observed in bed with their feet on the end of the bed on the bed board, a pillow was underneath their feet. R56 was observed to be obese and their was very little room in the bed on either side of their body. R56 was interviewed about the comfort of their bed and indicated they were uncomfortable and dissatisfied with their bed. R56 stated, Can you talk to them about getting me a better bed. On 9/10/24 at 3:05 PM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNAG) entered R56's to provide them with fresh water and was asked about R56's bed. CNA G stated, We need better beds. On 9/11/24 at 10:46 AM, R56 was observed in bed on their back with very little room in the bed on either side of their body. R56 stated, I cannot move in this bed. Once they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develope a comprehensive care plan for one (R103) out of six residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 10:20 AM, 2:05 PM, and 4:22 PM, and on 9/11/24 at 8:29 AM, 9:52 AM, 12:05 PM, 1:23 PM, and at 4:22 PM, R103 was observed lying in bed and a back brace was observed in R103's room. On 9/12/24 at 8:49 AM, R103 was observed standing in the hallway with their walker. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) C stated, Where is your back brace, you need to have it on at all times. CNA C was then observed applying R103's back brace. A review of R103's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Wedge compression fracture of fifth lumbar vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing. A review of R103's Brief Interview for Mental Status revealed a score of four, indicating cognitive impairment. A review of R103's physician orders revealed an active order which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect interventions for wandering behaviors for one resident (R76) out of one reviewed for behaviors. Findings include: On 9/10/24 at 10:13 AM, R76 was observed lying in bed sleeping soundly. On 9/10/24 at 4:00 PM, R76 was observed sitting up in bed watching television. On 9/10/24 during a confidential resident council, three residents discussed R76 wandering and behaviors at night. One resident stated, I have complained about (R76) coming into to room at all hours of the night. R76 doesnt pay attention to 'stop signs' on doors or if door is closed. I have to yell for the staff to come and help. R76 hits the staff and is difficult with them as well. A review of the record revealed R76 was admitted into the facility 02/05/24 with following diagnoses: Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Hyperlipidemia, Catatonic Schizophrenia and Depressive disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments on 8/14/24 revealed, Brief Inverview Mental Status assessment score was 00 indicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI