Lakeview Manor Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 54.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement timely interventions to prevent the development of a Stage 3 pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #18) and an unstageble pressure ulcer for another resident (Resident #30), follow interventions, ensure that physician's treatment orders were followed and documented and prevent the worsening of the Stage 3 pressure ulcer for Resident #18 of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in Resident #18's development and worsening of a Stage 3 pressure ulcer and Resident #30's development of a left heel unstageble pressure ulcer with the likelihood of pain and infection. Findings include: Resident #18: On 4/02/2024, at 2:30 PM, a record review of Resident #18's electronic medical record revealed a readmission on [DATE] after a short hospital stay with diagnoses that included Diabetes, weakness and Dementia. Resident #18 required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and had severely impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment (BiPAP, nebulizer treatment mask and nasal cannula) for 3 residents (#14, #25, and #27) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory equipment. Findings Include: Resident #25 On 5/11/26 at 11:37 AM, Resident #25 was observed in their room, sitting in a wheelchair. A nebulizer machine was present on the dresser beside the Resident's bed. The administration set of the nebulizer was connected and uncontained with visible fluid present in the medication chamber. An interview was completed at this time. When queried regarding the nebulizer machine and treatments, Resident #25 stated, Do daily in the morning. Record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), cerebral infarction (stroke) with resulting right sided hemiplegia and hemiparalysis (one-sided paralysis) and aphasia (difficulty communicating).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) submission assessment data for one resident (Resident #8) of one resident reviewed. Findings include:Resident #8:Review of the facility provided CMS-802 form indicated Resident #8 was receiving Hospice Services. Record review revealed Resident #8 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure, dementia, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed, dated 4/10/26, designated Resident #8 was not receiving Hospice services. Review of Resident #8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a care plan entitled, (Resident #8) is at risk for decline in condition, pain, depression, weight loss and other symptoms R/T (related to) terminal prognosis. Receives Hospice services. The care plan was created, initiated, and revised on 10/23/25. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #19) of 16 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living/ADL care received daily oral care and was shaven as needed. Findings Include:Resident #19: Review of the Face Sheet, care plans dated 4/3/26 through 5/13/26, and nursing notes, dated 4/26 and 5/26, revealed Resident #19 was 62 years-old, alert, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was totally dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The resident's diagnoses included, Cerebral Palsy, other symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system, spastic quadriplegic CP, and required assistance with personal care. Observations made during the survey, revealed Resident #19 had not had any oral care done or had been shaven on the following days and times: Observations made on 5/11/25: -At 9:00 a.m., the resident was in his bed awake and was waiting for his breakfast.-At 12:00 p.m., the resident was in his bed waiting for his noon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure coordination of care and communication with an external dialysis provider for one resident (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed. Findings include: Resident #7: On 5/11/26 at 3:20 PM, Resident #7 was not in their room. An interview was completed with Registered Nurse (RN) P on 5/11/26 at 3:23 PM. When queried regarding Resident #7's location, RN P responded that Resident #7 had recently returned from dialysis and went straight to the Activities Room when they got back. When asked, RN P revealed they were the Residents assigned nurse. When queried regarding the facility policy/procedure related to communication with the external dialysis provider, RN P responded the facility sends a form with the Resident when they leave, the dialysis nurse completes a portion and sends the form back with the Resident. RN P was asked if they had received a dialysis communication form following the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, 5 of 17 nursing staff (RN's & LPN's) and 5 Nursing Assistants/CNA's of 34 CNA staff failed to have up-to-date annual competency evaluations, resulting in the protentional for Nursing Assistants to not be able to re-certify certification, and improper nursing techniques and care for the facility's census of 54 residents. Findings Include:During an interview done on 5/13/26 at 11:25 a.m., In Service Nurse Director, RN I revealed she had been at the facility for 2 months, and the Nursing Assistant's/CNA's and Nurse's (Rn and LPN) annual competencies (facility competency check-off's) were not up-to-date, no one had done them for months prior to her. In Service Director I stated Before I came, no one did them; the last In Service Nurse did not keep them up-to-date. On 5/13/26 at 11:30 a.m., the In Service Director I and this surveyor went through all nursing and CNA's annual competencies for 2025 through 5/2026. There was a total of 5 Nurse's ana total of d 5 CNA's that were found to not be up-to-date with their facility annual competencies. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment in the kitchen (Soiled equipment, rust on freezer shelves), water in clean and ready for use dishes, and no use-by dates on open and partly used foods, for a census of 57 residents who eat from the kitchen. Findings include:On 5/11/26 starting at 8:15 a.m., the initial kitchen walkthrough was done with Dietary Manager B on 5/11/26 at 8:15 a.m., and the following concerns were noted: -At 8:17 a.m., observation of x 6 clean and ready for use plastic cups with water inside of all of them were in the dry cup container and ready for use. During an interview done on 5/11/26 at 8:19 a.m., Dietary Manager B stated yes, they (cups) are dry. According to the FDA 2022 Food Code, clean equipment and utensils were to be air dried in a manner in which allows them to circulate air in order to dry; no water should be left inside. -At 8:20 a.m., 1 open and partly used bag of chips (Bangles), 1 open package of hamburger buns, 1 open half loaf of bread, and 1 package of hot dog buns, were all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely implementation of Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) and ensure appropriate hand hygiene for one resident (Resident #58) of two residents reviewed for Infection Control (IC) resulting in a lack of immediate implementation of TBP for a resident with known positive Clostridioides difficile (C. diff- highly contagious bacterium which effects the colon, can be life threatening, and becomes a spore when outside of the body). Findings include:Resident #58: On 5/11/26 at 10:59 AM, a contact isolation sign was observed on Resident #58's room door. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) S was observed approaching Resident #58's room and began donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) without performing hand hygiene first. Family Member T approached the room while CNA S was donning PPE and asked CNA S if they needed to wear PPE to go into the room. CNA S told Family Member T they were unsure and would need to ask other staff. CNA S left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize an infection control program including ensuring safe and sanitary conditions in the beauty parlor, comprehensive outcome surveillance, evaluation and analysis of data for potential trends, and identification and monitoring of potential infections for all 57 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: An interview and review of facility Infection Control (IC) data was completed with IC Registered Nurse (RN) C on 3/27/25 at 2:09 PM. Upon request to review IC data for February 2025, RN C provided a written line listing tool, a typed line listing Surveillance Monthly Report, a mapping tool, and a summary form. When queried why there were both written and typed line listing forms, RN C revealed the written form is not an official tracking tool but stated they use it to make notes regarding infections when not in their office. RN C stated they enter the appropriate information into the system and the computer program generates the official typed Infection Surveillance Monthly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that weights were done accurately for two residents (Resident #11 & Resident #16). Findings include: Resident #11: Observation on 03/25/25 at 10:38 AM during the survey screening process the surveyor observed Resident #11 to be lying in bed and thin in appearance. Observation and interview on 03/25/25 at 01:06 PM with Resident #11 revealed that she did get lunch (while still lying in bed), she had Lost some weight, but that she was not hungry. Observation on 03/25/25 at 01:08 PM of Resident #11's meal tray in the meal tray brown box revealed 3/4 of tray was eaten. Record review of Resident #11's documented weights revealed that on 2/10/2025 at 12:49 PM weight was 129.0. Weight on 2/25/2025 at 3:09 PM was 123.5. The weight loss of 5.5 pounds was not reweighed again until 3/4/2025 at 2;01 PM of 123.5. Record review on 03/25/25 at 02:47 PM of Resident #11's weight log documentation revealed: On 1/21/2025 resident #11's weight was 136.2 pounds and on 2/25/2025 weight of 123.5 equaled a 12.7-pound weight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure proper labeling of open dates and expiration dates of multi-dose medications in 2 of 2 medication carts and 2) Ensure proper labeling of glucose monitor strips for expiration date after opening, resulting in the opened and undated medications and inaccurate blood glucose monitoring. Findings include: Observation and interview on 03/25/25 at 09:28 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) D of the 200/400 medication cart revealed that she was a unit manager and staff education director, but was working the 200/300 hallway medication cart because of a staff nurse call-in. RN D unlocked the medication cart to review with the state surveyor: Resident #41's had Lantus insulin pen open date with no expiration date, and Novolog insulin pen with open date, with no expiration date. Resident #28 had Humulin 70/30 insulin pen with open date and no expiration date. Novolin 70/30 insulin pen with an open date with no expiration date. Resident #17 had Lantus insulin 100unit/ml bottle with an open date that was unreadable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $898K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI