St. Anthony Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 135.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number M100131450. PNC was accepted for this citation. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (R81) of six residents reviewed for elopement by allowing the resident, who was severely cognitively impaired, ambulatory and identified as an elopement risk, to exit the building unbeknownst to facility staff while wearing a Wanderguard bracelet, including use of an alarmed elevator and exiting an alarmed door between approximately 9:15 PM - 9:25 PM on 08/07/2022. This deficient practice resulted in the likelihood of serious injury or death from being unsupervised outside in the dark near a busy four-lane road in the parking lot of a business adjacent to the facility. R81 was returned to the facility, escorted by an agency staff member who located the resident while on their way into work on 08/07/2022 at approximately 9:35 PM - 9:45 PM. Immediate Jeopardy: The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) started on 08/07/22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for three residents (R104, R106 and R110) out of three residents with pressure ulcers reviewed, resulting in the development of facility acquired stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon and or bone) pressure ulcers. Findings Include: This citation includes intake number 3005546. Resident 104 (R104) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date(ARD) of 12/9/25 reflected R104 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with recent readmission post hospital transfer 3/20/26 related to facility acquired stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon and or bone) pressure ulcer, and sepsis related to wound infection, with additional diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, hypertension, dysphasia(difficulty with swallowing) and communication deficit. The MDS reflected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00132074. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete/document accurate skin/wound assessments, and implement wound care interventions for three sampled residents (R64, R80, and R285) of six residents reviewed for skin care, resulting in unmet care needs and the potential for the worsening of wounds. Findings include: R285 A review of a complaint called into the State Agency revealed the following, My [family member] was not properly cared for in this facility. [R285] was left for several hours in soaked urine and feces, and was not attended by the staff. [This] resulted in [them] being hospitalized with a Stage 4 (Full Thickness Skin and Tissue Loss) bed sore . A review of R285's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 9/7/22, and discharged on 10/6/22 with diagnoses that included Diabetes, Muscle Weakness, and Bifascicular Block (heart block). A review of R285's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2609532Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely identification and treatment of pressure ulcers for one (R701) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Findings include:Review of Intake 2609532 revealed a concern regarding the presence and/or condition of multiple pressure ulcers on R701 upon their most recent admission to the hospital on [DATE]. At the time of this investigation on 09/09/25, R701 remained hospitalized .Review of R701's facility record revealed an original admission date of 10/08/21 and a most recent admission date of 08/13/25 with diagnoses including Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Sepsis, and Profound Intellectual Disability. This admission followed a hospitalization from 08/08/25 to 08/13/25. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the Wound Detail section which included the following:A right anterior ankle wound staged as a Deep Tissue Pressure Injury (DTPI-Persistent non-blanchable deep red,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 6/9/25 between 8:45 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial observation of the kitchen with Dietary Manager F, the following items were observed: The vent hood was observed with a heavy buildup of grease. There was a sticker observed on the vent hood, noting it was last cleaned 3/26/25. Dietary Manager F stated that company comes out every 3 months to clean the vent hood. There was no cleaning schedule set up for the months in between to ensure the vent hood was cleaned more frequently. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-602.13 Nonfood-Contact Surface, Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. There were gnats observed in the dish machine room and near 3 compartment sink. The floor in the dish machine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to eliminate harborage conditions to maintain an effective pest control program. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 6/9/25 at 9:15 AM, there were numerous gnats observed in the dish machine room and near the 3 compartment sink in the kitchen. There was a continuous leak of water onto the floor, from the recessed drain well on the soiled side of the dish machine. In addition, the drain pipe for the sink basin located on the soiled side of the dish machine was leaking water onto the floor. The floor in the dish machine room was very wet, with standing water in the wells between the floor tiles. In addition, there was water pooled on the floor in the corner behind the door. On 6/9/25 at 10:15 AM, Maintenance Director G was queried about the gnats and the water leaks/pooled water in the kitchen. Maintenance Director G stated they needed to regrout the floor and stated he would get a repair company out to fix the leaking pipes. Review of the pest…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistantly implement an effective measure (seperation) to prevent further abuse during an abuse investigation for one resident (R324) out of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of R324's progress notes revealed the following, Date: 6/8/2025 at 15:26 (4:26 PM) .Writer notified about another resident (R325) observed with hands touching in resident (324's) brief. Witness statement completed Admin (Administrator), DON (Director of Nursing) and family member notified, skin assessment completed no bruises nor redness noted. Resident currently sitting at nursing station. A review of the medical record revealed R324 admitted into the facility on 6/5/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Anxiety Disorder, Delirium, and Insomnia. Information was not available to review on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. R324 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. On 6/10/2025 at 9:44 AM, R324 was observed sitting at the nurse's station in the view of R325. R325 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #MI00148781. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food which accommodated residents' allergies for two Residents (R703, R706) of seven residents reviewed for food allergies. Findings include: R703 On 12/26/24 at 9:10 a.m., Family Member (FM) A reported during a phone interview R703 had been served chicken or chicken soup several times during their stay at the facility, beginning in September 2024. FM A stated, It says right on the meal ticket (they are) allergic to chicken .I have had meetings with them, the facility manager, the people in charge of nutrition, and the nursing manager (about their concerns) . FM A explained there were times when they had to drive to the facility to bring R703 an alternate meal. FM A stated R703 had chicken broth again this month for dinner, which still had chicken in it, and caused them concern. On 12/26/24 at approximately 9:30 a.m., R703 stated, They (facility staff) still give me chicken from time to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intake M100147381. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one kitchen hand washing station was supplied with soap and paper towel. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 1:35 PM, a tour of the kitchen was completed with the facility Dietary Manager (DM), Registered Dietician (RD) B and RD C. There were two other dietary staff working in the kitchen. Along with the DM, RD B and RD C, the hand washing station was observed. The hand soap dispenser and the paper towel dispenser were both observed empty. There was no secondary or back-up soap or paper towel readily available. On 10/29/24 at 2:56 PM, the facility DM reported the expectation is when the kitchen hand washing station is out of either soap or paper towel supplies, kitchen staff will call housekeeping staff to refill. On 10/29/24 at 3:00 PM, the facility Administrator (NHA) reported their expectation is the hand washing station in the kitchen would not be left without soap or paper towels and expressed the importance of hand washing in the kitchen versus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the main floor kitchenette, and in the rehab and second floor pantry. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility that consume food. Findings include: On 5/7/24 between 8:30 AM-9:15 AM, during an initial dietary tour with Dietary Manager (DM) M, the following items were observed: Rehab Pantry: In the resident refrigerator located in the Rehab Unit pantry, there was an undated container of spaghetti, a container of macaroni salad with a use-by date of 5/3, an undated bag of sliced ham, and 3 undated slices of pie. When queried, DM M stated nursing staff is responsible for ensuring resident food items are dated. In addition in the Rehab pantry, there were ants observed on the floor surrounding the floor drain next to the ice machine, with piles of ant dirt observed around the floor drain. DM M stated she would let maintenance know about the ant problem. Main 1st floor dining room: In the kitchenette located in the first floor dining room, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure paper towel dispensers were accessible for one (R9) resident and two anonymous group residents of five residents reviewed for accommodations. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R9 revealed an admission date of 09/24/15 with diagnoses that included Osteoarthritis, Pain in the Right Shoulder, Pain in the Left elbow, and Left Tibia/Fibula Fractures. On 05/07/24 at 7:44 AM, during initial resident screening R9 reported the paper towel dispensers in their bathroom and in the first floor dining room were too high and they couldn't reach them. R9 reported that they are not able to stand independently and they have limited shoulder range of motion. On 05/08/24 at 2:02 PM during Resident Council, two anonymous group members reported they were not able to reach the paper towel dispenser in their bathrooms or in the first floor dining room. These group members reported they had communicated this concern to the facility Maintenance Director and the facility Administrator (NHA) multiple times with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were implemented for two residents (R74, R102) of three reviewed for care and repositioning needs resulting in and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: R74 On 05/07/24 at 8:55 AM R74 was observed to be supine (flat on the back and buttocks) in bed with the head of the bed up around 30-45 degrees. R74 was asked about their care and reported they had a wound to their buttocks which felt sore and had consistent pain from the area along with their feet. The pain level was reported to be a ten out of ten sometimes and an eight at the time of the interview. R74 was asked about positioning off the wound area and reported they had a wedge in their old room but it did not come with them and needed a new one. An observation of the resident area revealed no wedge or pillow or other device to be used to off load pressure. R74 reported they needed assistance to turn side to side. On 05/07/24 at 4:24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an incontinence pad and gown were changed during incontinence care and clothing was available for one resident (R119) of one reviewed for care. Findings include: On 05/07/24 at 8:05 AM, R119 was asked about their care. R119 was observed to be dressed in a hospital style gown and brief which hung loosely on them. The gown was off the shoulder. R119 was asked about wearing a gown and if they wanted to wear clothes and said they would prefer to wear clothes but did not have any. The drawers and closet were observed and a single pair of pants were seen to be folded over a pants hanger in the closet. On 05/07/24 at 11:24 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I was observed to exit the room of R119. On 05/07/24 at 11:25 AM, R119 was observed to be supine in bed wearing a brief and a gown. R119 was interviewed about their care and reported the pad and gown were wet. A gloved hand was used to test the bed and gown which were found to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI