The Laurels Of Chagrin Falls

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 37.4 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate, necessary and timely care and treatment to meet their total care needs. The facility failed to ensure antibiotics and x-rays were completed as ordered for Resident #16, failed to ensure monthly weights were completed for Resident #1, and failed to ensure physician orders were in place for blood glucose monitoring of Resident #84. Actual Harm occurred on 12/08/22 when Resident #16, who was cognitively impaired and required staff assistance for activities of daily living was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis (blood infection) related to a wound to the left heel. Physician's orders for the antibiotic, Doxycycline and imaging to rule out osteomyelitis were not completed as ordered contributing to the hospitalization. This affected one resident (#16) of one resident reviewed for wounds and two residents (#1 and #84) of 14 sampled residents. The facility identified one resident as having…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-12-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were ordered and administered to Resident #16 in a timely manner to treat suspected osteomyelitis (bone infection). Actual Harm occurred on 12/08/22 when Resident #16 was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis (blood infection) related to a wound to the left heel. Physician order for the antibiotic, doxycycline was not obtained as recommended to treat suspected osteomyelitis contributing to the hospitalization. This affected one resident (#16) of one resident reviewed for wounds. The facility identified one resident as having wounds, Resident #16. The facility census was 34. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical records revealed an admission date of 09/16/22 with diagnoses including non pressure chronic ulcer of right foot, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and diabetes. Resident #16 was admitted with two unstageable pressure ulcers (areas were not identified). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/25/22 revealed Resident #16 had impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-09 · tag F0895 — widespread
  Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review, review of the facility ' s Background Check log, review of the [NAME] Municipal Court docket, staff schedule review, staff member handbook review, review of the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC), and interview, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #46, did not continue to provide direct care to residents after she was convicted of a disqualifying offense according to State law. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 34.Findings include:Review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #46's personnel record revealed a hire date of 06/04/25. Review of the Ohio Department of Health Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) (within CNA #46's personnel record) dated 06/03/25 revealed CNA #46 was eligible to work and in good standing. Review of the Ohio Attorney General Criminal History Record Check dated 06/13/25 (within CNA #46's personnel record) revealed CNA #46 had a criminal history and was arrested and charged with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient bathing was provided to all dependent residents. This affected two (Residents #1 and #20) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The census was 45. Findings Include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, sepsis due to MRSA, COPD, muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia, type II diabetes, urinary tract infection, obstructive and reflux uropathy, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, congestive heart failure, pleural effusion, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, atrial fibrillation, anemia, aortic stenosis, and hyperlipidemia. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/17/25, revealed he had mild cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for bathing/showering. Review of Resident #1 current shower schedule…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed quarterly for Residents #13 and #14. This affected two of three residents whose records were reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of prostate, paranoid schizophrenia, and unspecified dementia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 scored 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the functional abilities section of the MDS assessment revealed no impairment however Resident #14 utilized a wheelchair for locomotion. Review of the completed care conference documentation revealed Resident #14 had care conferences 03/26/24 and 08/26/24. There was no evidence found in the medical record that indicated a care conference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11's pressure ulcer wound care was completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcer wounds. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, essential hypertension and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #11's care plans revealed an intervention dated 10/29/24 for treatments to skin impairments as ordered. Review of Resident #11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/10/25 to cleanse the left heel wound with normal saline, pat dry, apply betadine to the wound and cover with an abdominal (ABD) pad and Kerlix every night shift for wound care. Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's nutritional supplement was implemented as planned. This affected one (Resident #3) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/03/24 for a regular diet, regular texture, thin consistency. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's dietary progress note dated 12/31/24 at 11:48 A.M. revealed the resident was slightly underweight and the regular diet remained tolerated. The resident had between meal supplements in place for nutrition support and snacks were noted in the resident's room. Review of Resident #3's lunch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36's expired insulin was discarded as appropriate. This affected one (Resident #36) of five residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 12:15 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #822 revealed LPN #822 completed blood glucose testing for Resident #36 with a result of 175. LPN #822 then administered three units of Humalog fast acting insulin into the resident's right arm using a Humalog Kwikpen. The date first used written on the Kwikpen in marker was [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 12:20 P.M. with LPN #822 confirmed Resident #36's Humalog Kwikpen was expired and should have been discarded after 28 days after first being used. The Humalog Kwikpen expired [DATE]. Review of the Insulin Lispro (Humalog) KwikPen Instructions for Use form revised [DATE] revealed an in-use pen should be stored at room temperature up to 86 degrees Fahrenheit and away from heat and light. The pen should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the blood glucose testing (BGT) machine/glucometer was appropriately cleaned and disinfected to prevent the potential cross-contamination of blood borne pathogens affecting one resident (Resident #36) with the potential to affect an additional resident (Resident #24) whose medications were stored in the Nurse Station 2 medication administration cart. The facility also failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene, appropriate glove use, and appropriate cleaning technique were implemented during Resident #29's catheter care affecting one resident (Resident #29) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, type two diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #24's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/30/24 for sliding scale insulin; inject Humalog as per sliding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and menu spreadsheet review, the facility failed to follow the menu as written. This affected two residents (#16 and #34) of two residents receiving a puree diet. Facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the menu spreadsheet for week two, Thursday corresponding to 08/29/24 revealed portions of the menu were to be served as followed for those receiving pureed meals: five ounces pureed sloppy joes, four ounces pureed tater tots, four ounces pureed lima beans, six ounces pureed soup of the day and two ounces pureed cookie (no nuts). Review of the facility resident diet list revealed Resident #16 and #34 received pureed diets. Observation of lunch tray service on 08/29/24 at 12:24 P.M. revealed the trays for the two residents on a pureed diet (Resident #16 and Resident #34) were at the end of the tray line. Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #52 was plating meals during service and brought two divided plates over to the serving area. A blue #16-scoop (two ounces) was placed into the pan with the pureed sloppy joe meat, a blue #16-scoop was placed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary kitchen area, ensure foods were stored in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent contamination and food borne illness, and ensure expired products were discarded. This affected all 34 residents residing at the facility receiving meals. Findings included: 1. Observation on 12/04/22 at 8:10 A.M. during tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager #410 revealed heavily soiled floors throughout the kitchen. The cold air return vent on the opposite wall of the dish machine revealed a heavily soiled vent on the wall with thickened black dust on the grates with peeling paint. Mold that was black in color was visible on the ceiling above the dish machine, and the exhaust pipe from the dish machine to the outside wall had mold and peeling paint over the area where clean dishes were discharged from the dish machine. A light switch with metal tubing covering the electrical wires going from the wall switch towards the ceiling had peeling paint above the clean dish lane where clean trays of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received scheduled and appropriate activities on the weekend. This affected Residents #7, #21, #22 and #84 and had the potential to affect all 34 residents in the facility. Findings include: Record review of the facility activity calendar revealed on Sunday 12/04/22 the following activities were scheduled: Trivia and coffee at 1:00 P.M., floats and tunes at 2:00 P.M., and word puzzles at 3:00 P.M. This exact schedule was also in place for Sunday 12/11/22 and Sunday 12/18/22. Interview with Resident #22 on 12/04/22 at 9:22 A.M. revealed the facility occasionally had activities on Saturday, otherwise there were no activities over the weekend. Observation of the facility common and activity rooms on 12/04/22 at 1:27 P.M. revealed no evidence of any organized activities in progress. Two large whiteboards in common rooms had the day's activity schedule prominently posted. Interview with State-Tested Nursing Aide #443 on 12/04/22 at 1:37 P.M. revealed she knew of no activity workers currently in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $179K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH