Laurels Of Defiance The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 204 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 93.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the hospital report, review of the written statements, review of the employee education, review of an employee personnel file, and review of the facility ' s audits, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident as care planned. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #50 suffered a fractured tibia and fibula following an improper transfer by facility staff. This affected one (#50) of one resident reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/09/15. Diagnoses included diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, other fracture of upper and lower end of unspecified fibula, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, post traumatic seizures, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility policy, and pharmacy documentation, the facility failed to store resident insulin in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected six of 17 residents (#14, #24, #25, #31, #34 #51) identified by the facility to receive insulin administration in a facility census of 93. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 10:55 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #402 during observation of the 100 hall medication cart storage noted three open insulin pens. Resident #25 Fiasp insulin pen, Resident #14 Lantus insulin pen, and Resident #34 Basaglar insulin pen. No date was marked on the insulin pens indicated when they were opened. Interview with LPN #402 at the time of observation verified insulin pens, and vials are to be marked with the date when opened. According to facility pharmacy guidelines for Medications with Shortened Expiration dates indicated Fiasp, Lantus, and Basaglar insulins expire 28 after opening. 2. On [DATE] at 10:59 A.M. observation of the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an incontinent resident received timely interventions. This affected one (#191) of two residents reviewed for urinary and bowel incontinence care and services in a facility census of 93. Findings include: Resident #191 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, malnutrition, coronary artery disease, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy. According to the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] Resident #191 was assessed with impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for the provision of activities of daily living, received nutrition via feeding tube, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 06/04/25 a nursing plan of care was revised to address Resident #191's incontinent of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy care was provided with approved technique to prevent cross contamination. This affected one (#191) of one residents reviewed for tracheostomy care and treatment. Facility census 93. Findings include: Resident #191 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, malnutrition, coronary artery disease, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy. According to the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] Resident #191 was assessed with impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for the provision of activities of daily living, received nutrition via feeding tube, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of physician orders revealed Tracheostomy (Trach) care to be performed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were responded to in a timely manner. This affected two residents (#48 and #24) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 93 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/01/21. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, multiple sclerosis, impulsiveness, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression, and central nervous system disorder. Review of Resident #48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating Resident #48 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #48 required maximal assistance with toilet use, bathing, personal hygiene. Resident #48 was independent with bed mobility and required supervision with transfer. Resident #48 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control practices were carried out. This affected three residents (#82, #55, and #303) of five residents reviewed for infection control practices. The facility census was 93. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #82's medical record reveals an admission date of 05/13/25 Diagnoses included right femur fracture subsequent encounter, type II diabetes, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and clostridium difficile (C-Diff). Review of Resident #82's physician orders revealed an order dated 06/04/25 for oxygen at two liters via nasal cannula to maintain greater than 92% and an order for contact isolation for C-Diff all services provided in room and in room by self. Observation on 06/09/25 at 12:20 P.M. of Resident #82 found her in bed in her room. A sign was posted announcing Resident #82 was on contact precautions. Personal protective equipment including gloves, gowns, and facemasks was available in a cart outside her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-08 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to terminate employment for a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) who had a finding entered in the State Nurse Aide Registry concerning abuse, neglect, or misappropriation. This resulted in one employee, STNA #101, working at the facility while he was not eligible to work in a long-term care facility. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #101 revealed a hire date of 12/01/22. Review of the background check log revealed STNA #101's background check was submitted 11/22/22, completed 12/07/22 and received at the facility on 12/14/22. STNA #101 was hired to work. Review of the Ohio Department of Health Nurse Aide Registry form dated 11/23/22 revealed STNA #101 was eligible to work and his registry was in good standing. Review of the Criminal History Record Check dated 12/07/22 and stamped by the facility Received 12/14/22 revealed STNA #101 was arrested for theft and forgery 10/30/22 and the case was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility cleaning schedule, the facility failed to ensure resident wheelchairs were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected four (#12, #43, #48, #63) of four residents reviewed for clean equipment. The census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/01/20. Diagnoses included benign neoplasm of the left choroid, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder recurrent, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed Resident #48 utilized a wheelchair. Observation on 04/03/23 at 5:00 P.M. of Resident #48's wheelchair revealed the wheelchair had a build up of grime and dirt along the metal bars along the side and under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and boosters, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the COVID-19 vaccine booster in a timely manner. This affected six (#4, #11, #19, #20, #26, and #43) of nine residents reviewed for the COVID-19 vaccine. The census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/17. Diagnoses included cutaneous abscess of the buttock, generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes intractable, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphasia, muscle weakness, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, unspecified dementia, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the immunization record revealed Resident #4 last received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident preference and choice for when to get up was honored. This affected two (#37 and #35) of five residents reviewed for choices. The census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed a re-admission date of 03/25/23 with an initial admission dated of 06/01/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, heart failure, syncope and collapse, cirrhosis of liver, major depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus type II, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, and personal history of COVID-19. Review of Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #37 was cognitively intact. Resident #37 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #37 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #37's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of an incident and accident log, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper notifications were made following resident falls and transfers to the emergency room. This affected two (#16 and #77) of eight residents reviewed for notification. The census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/02/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, muscle weakness, diabetes mellitus type II, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hoarding disorder, morbid obesity, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #16 was cognitively intact. Resident #16 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #16 was totally dependent on staff for bathing. Resident #16…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $546K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH