No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Laurels Of Middletown

751 Kensington Street, Middletown, OH 45044 · For profit - Corporation · 109 certified beds · (513) 424-3511 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 424-3511 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4040 Roosevelt Blvd · (513) 424-0941 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.8 mi
700 S Breiel Blvd · (513) 425-8702 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3523 Roosevelt Blvd · (513) 217-7240 · Call to confirm hours
Park
603 Florence St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3186 Barbara Dr · (513) 423-8011

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.1%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.2%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.0%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.8%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.6%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.2%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.5–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
52.9%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 95.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-05-23)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2021-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, review of Self Reported Incident (SRI) and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #25 when the resident entered another residents room, the other resident shoved Resident #25 and caused her to fall. Resident #25 sustained a fractured hip and was admitted to the hospital. The facility also failed to ensure fall devices were in place and residents received adequate supervision with smoking. This affected three Residents (#13, #25, and #84) of four reviewed for supervison to prevent accidents and hazards. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #25 was originally admitted on [DATE]. The resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] related to a fractured hip. The resident was readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included fracture of the right hip, pain in the left knee, contracture of the left hip, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-01-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents pain was properly managed and failed to ensure a speciality appointment for pain was scheduled in a timely manner. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #5 who had uncontrolled pain and difficulty sleeping. This affected one (#5)of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility identified 53 residents on a pain management program. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 12/28/15. Diagnoses included benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary tract infection, and chronic lung disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and he was independent for eating. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #5 was on a scheduled pain medication regimen. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed provide appropriate assistance for a resident during care to prevent a fall. This effected one (#8) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 93.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, traumatic compartment syndrome of the right upper and lower extremities, paraplegia, and dysphagia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six and was assessed to require self-care assistance and mobility assistance.Review of Resident #8's admission comprehensive evaluation dated 09/15/25 revealed for toileting the resident was determined to be a two-person assist.Review of the care plan for Resident #8 dated 09/19/25 revealed he was at risk for fall related injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of an incident report, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had active orders for a medication prior to administration, resulting in a significant medication error. This effected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 93.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, epilepsy, asthma, anxiety, dysphagia, and muscle weakness. Resident #10 was discharged from the facility on 08/07/25. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three and was assessed to require self-care assistance.Review of the facility's incident report dated 07/22/25 revealed, on 07/21/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 confirmed she administered five (5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 97 residents residing at the facility who receive their meals from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the facility kitchen with the Administration Aide (AA) #266 on 05/20/24 at 7:44 A.M., a trash can located underneath the kitchen hand washing sink which was soiled with splatter running down the sides. Observations revealed a pile of soiled and dirty dishtowels with multiple live gnats flying on and around the dishtowels. The kitchen floor appeared dirty with debris throughout. The dishwasher had food debris all over the top and along the bottom of the dishwasher. Further review of the kitchen revealed a walk-in refrigerator and AA #266 confirmed a large plastic container of sweet potatoes marked 05/16/24 -05/18/24. AA #266 confirmed a large metal container with boiled eggs and water dated 05/11/24. A large metal container of precooked scrambled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and sanitary environment for the residents. This affected four (#25, #36, #46 and #51) out of four residents reviewed for the physical environment. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Interview on 05/20/24 at 2:48 P.M. with Resident #46 revealed he was upset that his bed was not comfortable and felt as though it was broken. Resident #46 confirmed his mattress was not lying on the bed correctly. Resident #46 stated his bed does not face the television in his room and he must turn his head to the left to watch television. Resident #46 stated the brown wall beside his bed had a large white drywall substance on it for several months. Interview on 05/21/24 at 8:33 A.M. with Resident #51 revealed he can feel the bed rails on the frame pushing through his mattress. Resident #51 pointed to a large, rounded area on his mattress and the bed rails underneath it. Resident #51 stated he was told by staff he will have a replacement mattress; however, he was never given one.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected six (#01, #24, #41, #74, #82, and #92) residents out of the 25 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 07/25/04 with medical diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, paranoid schizophrenia, psychotic disorder with delusions and seizures. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an annual MDS assessment, dated 03/28/24, revealed Resident #01 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS did not have any documentation to support Resident #01's functional status was assessed. Review of section GG of Resident #01's MDS was dashed, and all areas were blank. 2. Review of the medical record Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 08/02/19 with medical diagnoses of atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed upon admission. This affected one (#25) out of the two residents reviewed for PASRR completion. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 08/05/22 with medical diagnoses of anoxic brain injury, depression, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, functional quadriplegia, and convulsions. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #25 was cognitively intact and was dependent for toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed a Review Results letter, dated 07/22/16, which stated the Pre-admission Screen determination was not applicable and level of care determination was Intermediate. Further review of the medical record revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address resident's dental status. This affected two (#82 and #92) of 25 resident care plans reviewed. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #92 revealed admission date of 04/26/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, anxiety, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and psychoactive substance abuse. The resident remained in the facility. Review of Resident #92's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. She required supervision for her activities of daily living. Record review of the care plan of Resident #92 revealed no dental plan of care. Interview on 05/20/24 at 10:32 A. M. with Resident #92 revealed she had a concern for care of her broken lower teeth. Observation at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct resident care conferences. This affected three (#24, #54 and #79) residents out of the five residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 08/02/19 with medical diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, anxiety, right sided hemiparesis related to cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/20/24, which indicated Resident #24 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed the facility conducted a quarterly care conference on 03/25/24. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation to support the facility conducted any other care conferences in the past 12 months. Interview on 05/21/24 at 9:28 A.M. with Resident #24 stated he recently had a care conference but that was the first care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with hand hygiene. This affected one (#49) out of four residents reviewed for personal hygiene. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of functional quadriplegia, injury of unspecified level of cervical spinal cord, muscle spasms, muscle weakness, anxiety, and depressive disorders. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 is cognitively intact. His functional status is listed as set up to dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. For showering the resident is dependent but for toileting he is substantial/maximal assistance. For eating and hygiene he is just set up only. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #49 has a functional ability deficit and requires assistance with self-care/mobility related to impaired mobility, muscle weakness, pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's hand splint was applied as physician ordered. This affected one (#49) out of four residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of functional quadriplegia, injury of unspecified level of cervical spinal cord, muscle spasms, muscle weakness, anxiety, and depressive disorders. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 is cognitively intact. His functional status is listed as set up to dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. For showering the resident is dependent but for toileting he is substantial/maximal assistance. For eating and hygiene he is just set up only. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #49 has a functional ability deficit and requires assistance with self-care/mobility related to impaired mobility, muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely care and services to treat a urinary tract infection. This affected one (#298) out of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #298 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with medical diagnoses of pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #298 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and expired at the hospital. Review of the medical record for Resident #298 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #298 had moderate cognitive impairment and required maximum staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers and was dependent for toilet hygiene and bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #298…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was observed to take their medications at the time of administration. This affected one (#74) of five residents reviewed medication administration. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #74 revealed admission date of 04/09/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including alcohol dependence, epilepsy, dementia without behavior, anxiety and metabolic encephalopathy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating impaired cognition. The activities of daily living were not assessed. Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed a physician orders for 500 micrograms of Vitamin B daily, 50000 of Vitamin D daily, 125 milligrams of Depakote twice daily, 81 milligrams aspirin daily and 500 milligrams Keppra twice daily. Review for Resident #74's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #298 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with medical diagnoses of pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #298 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and expired at the hospital. Review of the medical record for Resident #298 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #298 had moderate cognitive impairment and required maximum staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers and was dependent for toilet hygiene and bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #298 revealed physician orders dated [DATE] for 16 French indwelling catheter for neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and an order dated [DATE] for repeat urinalysis with culture for dysuria one time only. Review of the medical record for Resident #298 revealed a nurse progress note, dated [DATE] at 5:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control procedure when administering intravenous medication. This affected one (#50) out of five residents observed for medication administration. Facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #20 revealed admission date of 04/22/24. Diagnoses include osteomyelitis, anxiety, and heart failure. Review of Resident #20's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. She was independent with activities of daily living. Observation on 05/21/24 at 9:23 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #309 of the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line medication administration for Resident #20 revealed LPN #309 cleansed the tip of the needleless connector of the PICC line with an alcohol swab and then intentionally dropped the line and it landed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete weekly wound evaluations of a surgical wound. This affected one (#105) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 02/20/24 with medical diagnoses of status post left below the knee amputation (BKA), diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, depression, bipolar disorder, anemia, and hypertension. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #105 discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/27/24, which indicated Resident #105 was cognitively intact and required supervision with bed mobility and moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, transfers, and bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #105 admitted with a surgical wound and treatment was in place. Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and guardian interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the correct location for discharge on a discharge notice. This affected one (Resident #204) of three residents reviewed for proper discharges. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #204 revealed an admission date of 07/23/22 with medical diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, end stage renal disease, and anxiety. Resident #204 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE] for increased behaviors and agitation. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #204 was cognitively intact and required supervision at times with bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. Review of the nursing progress note dated 09/01/23, revealed the dialysis center would no longer provide dialysis to Resident #204 because of his increased behaviors and an episode where Resident #204 pulled out his dialysis tubing and experienced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interview, review of facility policies, and review of the facility legionella water prevention program, the facility failed to implement transmission based precautions for residents with Coronavirus (COVID-19) like symptoms. This affected four Residents (#8, #24, #46, and #72) and had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility also failed to have a sufficient legionella prevention plan. This had the potential to affect all the residents of the facility. The facility also failed to ensure staff washed their hands when distributing meals to residents. This affected two (#1 and #37) residents observed during meals. The census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/14/14. Diagnoses listed included schizophrenia, aphasia, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Further review revealed a physician order for contact and droplet precautions (transmission-based precautions) related to COVID-19 dated 04/16/21. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility's resident care guidelines, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, and personal and oral hygiene. This affected two (#16 and #22) of four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission dated of 05/02/19, with diagnoses including; dementia with behavioral disturbance, altered mental status, aphasia, anxiety disorder, heart failure, major depressive disorder, need for assistance with personal care, and COVID-19 on 12/10/20. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, requesting two staff persons for bed mobility and transfer, and the limited assistance of one staff to eat. The assessment also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with an ongoing program of individual activities, consistent with the comprehensive assessment, designed to meet their specific interests in order to promote psychosocial well-being. This affected one (#83) of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/18/21, with diagnoses including: diabetes mellitus type 2 with diabetic neuropathy, morbid obesity, injury of kidney, hypertension, chronic embolism and thrombosis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of an admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was alert and oriented, with good memory and recall. The resident required the physical assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfer, and did not walk. Review of the resident's physician orders dated 03/18/21 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interviews, review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately document pressure ulcer treatments and accurately document resident's pressure ulcers. This affected two (#16 and #21) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/02/19. Diagnoses listed included altered mental status, aphasia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, muscle weakness, and major depressive disorder. Resident #16 was assessed as requiring extensive of assistance of two staff members for activities of daily living (ADL), not having a pressure ulcer, and being cognitively intact. Review of wound evaluation notes dated 02/16/21 revealed Resident #16 had a new in-house acquired stage III pressure ulcer to the coccyx measuring 1.02 centimeters (cm) x 0.87 cm x 0.1 cm. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 02/19/21 for cleanse buttocks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below five percent. A total of 26 medications were observed administered with two medication errors, resulting in error rate of 7.69 percent. This affected two (#136 and #1) of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 81. Findings included: Observations on 04/21/21 at 9:35 A.M., of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #80 administering medication to Resident #136, revealed LPN #80 administered Calcium 500 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth. Review of Resident #136's physician's orders revealed an order for Oscal 500/200 mg (Calcium Carbonate and Vitamin D) once daily. Observation was made on 04/21/21 at 10:10 A.M., of LPN #80 administering medication to Resident #1, revealed LPN #80 administered Calcium Citrate 200 mg. Review of Resident #1's physician's orders revealed an order for Calcium Citrate and D3, 315-250 mg (Calcium Citrate with Vitamin D) to give one tablet twice daily. Interview on 04/21/21 04:33 P.M., with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine dental care. This affected one (#26) of four residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/03/20, with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, obesity, iron deficiency anemia, congestive heart failure, and dementia without behavioral disturbances. The resident was receiving Medicaid benefits. Review of a quarterly minimum data set assessment for the resident dated 01/21/21 revealed he had good memory and recall. He was not identified as having any oral/dental problems at that time. Review of the resident's current comprehensive plan of care revealed a problem/need which specified the resident was at risk for infection, pain or bleeding in the oral cavity. The goal for the resident was to be be free of infection, pain or bleeding in the oral cavity. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher and food items were being properly maintained to prevent contamination and spoilage. This affected 99 of 99 residents who receive meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified for two (#55 and #58) residents who receive nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 101. Findings include: Observations of the facility's kitchen on 01/13/19 at 9:25 A.M., revealed Dietary Aide #99 and Dietary Aide #112, to be actively washing dishes from breakfast. Observation of the dishwasher temperature revealed the dishwasher to be running at 100 degrees Fahrenheit during the wash and 110 degrees Fahrenheit during the rinse. The metal plate on the side of the dishwasher revealed the dishwasher to require a minimum temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit during the wash and rinse. Observation of Dietary Aide #99 testing the chemicals in the dishwasher, revealed the chemical to be at 0 parts per million (ppm). Interview with Dietary Aide #99 on 01/13/19 at 9:25 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a copy of the transfer and discharge notification to the Ombudsman. The facility also failed to provide residents with notifications that included the reasons for their discharges. This affected four (#6, #19, #21 and #38) of eight residents reviewed for discharge notification. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; muscle wasting and atrophy, unspecified injury at unspecified level of cervical spinal cord, hypotension, concussion without loss of consciousness, vitamin D deficiency, other psychotic disorder, insomnia, gangrene, acquired absence of left leg above knee, type two diabetes and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-16 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received bed hold notification. This affected four (#6, #19, #21 and #38) of eight residents reviewed for discharge notification. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; muscle wasting and atrophy, unspecified injury at unspecified level of cervical spinal cord, hypotension, concussion without loss of consciousness, vitamin D deficiency, other psychotic disorder, insomnia, gangrene, acquired absence of left leg above knee, type two diabetes and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #6 also required supervision with eating and total dependence with transfers. Further review of Resident #6's record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-01-16 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure resident's Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessments assessed the resident's cognition, mood and pain. This affected four Resident's (#5, #84, #105 and #303) of 27 reviewed for MDS. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; acute kidney failure, ataxic gait, muscle wasting and atrophy, essential hypertension, lower back pain, generalized anxiety disorder and cocaine abuse. Review of Resident #84's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition and mood were marked as not assessed. Resident #84 was reported as independent with toileting and required supervision with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, eating and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #84's Brief Interview for Mental Statues (BIMS) dated 01/15/19 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview with MDS Coordinator #84 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents had care plans developed and implemented for smoking, falls, activities, psychotropic medications, and range of motion. This affected five Resident's (#13, #43, #55, #58 and #84) of 27 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; acute kidney failure, ataxic gait, muscle wasting and atrophy, essential hypertension, lower back pain, generalized anxiety disorder and cocaine abuse. Review of Resident #84's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was not assessed. Resident #84 was reported to be independent with toileting and required supervision with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, eating and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #84's record revealed the resident signed the smoking policy upon admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised. The facility also failed to provide residents with the ability to participate in the implementation and development of their care plans. This affected five (#5, #6, #19, #67 and #76) of 27 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; other symbolic dysfunctions, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, polyarthritis, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and intracranial injury without loss of consciousness. Review of Resident #67's annual Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, personal hygiene. Resident #67 was independent with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided for a resident who was deaf , failed to ensure residents were assessed and that the activities met the residents interests. This affected four (#5, #19, #55 and #58) of seven reviewed for activities. The census was 101. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed admission date of 09/22/17. Medical diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and deaf nonspeaking. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact. Functional status was independent for bed mobility, transfers, eating and toilet use. she was always continent for bowel and bladder. Interview with Resident #19 on 01/14/19 at 8:47 A.M. revealed she was able to communicate by reading lips. She indicated she doesn't participate in activities because she does not know what everyone was saying. She stated she very rarely received an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) the facility failed to identify and complete a significant change assessment. This affected two Residents (#21 and #25) of 27 reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #25 revealed an original admission date of 01/11/18. The resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] due to a fractured hip from a fall. The resident was readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included fracture of right hip, pain in left knee, contracture of left hip, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, heart disease, major depressive disorder, psychosis, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. Review of significant change assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS did not indicate a fall with major injury even thought the resident had a fall on 08/08/18 that resulted in a fractured hip. The resident had a weight of 148 pounds.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately code an injectable medication on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This affected one Resident (#72) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Record review for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 12/19/18 with diagnosis including fracture of left hip, muscle weakness, communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, hypertension and seizures. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed the residents cognition was not assessed. The resident required extensive assist for bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene with staff support. The number of medications the resident received as injections in the last seven days was coded as zero. Review of physician orders for the month of December 2018 revealed an order for Enoxaparin injectable (brand name anti clotting medication) 30 milligrams (mg)/0.3 milliliters (ml) administer 0.3 ml (30 mg) subcutaneously (injection)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately complete a baseline plan of care within 48 hours of admission. This affected two Residents (#21 and #72) of 27 reviewed for baseline plan of care. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 12/19/18 with diagnosis including fracture of left hip, muscle weakness, communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, hypertension and seizures. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was was not assessed. The resident required extensive assist for bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene with staff support. Review of baseline plan of care revealed the medical record was silent for this document. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #27 on 01/15/19 at 12:19 P.M. revealed she was unable to locate the baseline plan of care. Interview with the Corporate RN #300 on 01/16/19 at 1:30 P.M., revealed the base line plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy was provided to residents. This affected one (#55) of one resident reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative care. The facility identified 23 residents who received rehabilitative services. The census was 101. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 11/16/18. Medical diagnoses included traumatic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely or never understood. He was totally dependent for bed mobility, transfers, eating and toileting. Further review of the MDS revealed there were functional limitations in range of motion (ROM) for the upper and lower extremities impairment for both sides. Review of Physical Therapy (PT) discharge notes dated 12/17/18 for Resident #55 revealed to provide bilateral extremities ROM while in bed. Review of Occupational Therapy (OT) discharge notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review observation, and interview and the facility failed to ensure a pressure reducing device was monitored and had the correct settings. his affected one Resident (#25) of six reviewed for pressure. The facility identified two residents who utilized alternating pressure mattress. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE]. The resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] due to a fractured hip. The resident was readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of the right hip, pain in the left knee, contracture of the left hip, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, heart disease, major depressive disorder, psychosis, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. Review of physician orders for the month of January 2019 revealed an order for an air mattress with concave side to the bed at all times to help define bed boundaries. This order had a start date of 10/04/18. Review of the plan of care for actual impaired skin integrity with an initiation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of weight loss and who was pocketing food received a speech evaluation. This affected one Resident (#27) of one reviewed for nutritional status. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 05/07/15 with diagnosis of mood disorders, hearing loss, dementia without behaviors, abnormal heart beats with pacemaker placement, arthritis, muscle weakness, mental disorder, depressive disorder, anemia, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the most recent quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not assessed for cognition. The resident required extensive assist with eating and had weight loss in the last month or six month. The resident had no identified dental or chewing problems. Review of the plan of care with an initiation date of 08/10/18 and revision on 09/25/18, 10/02/18, and 01/04/19 revealed an identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were receiving psychotropic medications were assessed for non pharmaceutical interventions prior to receiving the medications and also failed to ensure gradual dose reductions were attempted for the use of psychotropic medications. This affected three (#30, #33, and #88) of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 101. Finds include: 1. Review of Resident #88's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/14/15. Diagnosis included hypertension, diabetes, schizophrenia, coronary artery disease anxiety disorder, chronic gout, major depressive disorder, insomnia, renal impairment, diverticulitis, acquired coagulation factor deficiency, and heart failure. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #88 was cognitively intact and was supervision only for all activities of daily living. The MDS indicated no symptoms of depression. Review of a care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and laboratory supplies were discarded appropriately and medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff. This affected two of two medication carts and an undetermined number of residents who utilize the medications and supplies from the storage rooms. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Observations of the nurses station storage area on the South unit on 01/15/19 at 10:49 A.M., revealed five intravenous solution bags labeled 0.45% Normal Saline with an expiration date of 12/13/18 an two select silicone cure catheter for suction with expiration dates of 08/08/18 were being stored in this area during the survey. All other injectable medications and medical supplies being stored was not expired. Interview with Regional Support Registered Nurse #310, immediately following the observation on 01/15/19 at 10:49 A.M., verified there were expired injectable's, food items and medical supplies stored in the nurses stations supply areas. She further stated the drugs should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#33) of five residents reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Record review for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 10/31/10. Diagnoses included stroke, hemiplegia, muscle wasting, difficulty with speaking, anemia, dementia with behaviors, high cholesterol, insomnia, muscle weakness, overactive bladder, allergies, hearing loss, anxiety and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders for Resident #33, revealed laboratory orders with a start date of 09/28/16, for a Basic Metabolic Profile (BMP) every three months; a Complete Blood Count (broad screening to test for anemia and infections), Magnesium ( test for abnormal levels) and Renal Panel (kidney function) every four months with a start date of 01/25/17; a Hepatic Panel (liver functions) every six months with a start date of 10/11/16; a HgBA1C ( average sugar levels in blood over two to three months) every six months…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete, accurate and protected. This affected three (#5, #35 and #20) 27 of residents reviewed during the investigation portion of the survey. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/09/15. Diagnosis included kidney failure anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and hypertension. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #20 was cognitively intact and required extensive assist of one for activities of daily living. Review of the skin risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated the resident was at risk for skin disturbance. Review of a care plan with a revised date of 01/03/19, revealed an intervention of treatments as ordered. Review of a Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) note dated 01/02/19, revealed a diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement their smoking policy in regards to supervising residents with smoking and smoking materials. This affected one (#84) of one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, ataxic gait, muscle wasting and atrophy, essential hypertension, lower back pain, generalized anxiety disorder and cocaine abuse. Review of Resident #84's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident's cognition was not assessed. Resident #84 was reported to be independent with toileting and required supervision with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, eating and personal hygiene. Further review of Resident #84's record revealed the resident signed the smoking policy on 12/21/18. Review of Resident #84's smoking assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE — 81 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 80 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aria Nursing and RehabilitationLansing, MI 1 of 5Autumnwood of McBainMcBain, MI 1 of 5Christian Park Health Care CenterEscanaba, MI 1 of 5Courtney ManorBad Axe, MI 1 of 5Ely ManorAllegan, MI 1 of 5Kith HavenFlint, MI 1 of 5Laurels Of Norworth TheWorthington, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Carrollton TheWest Carrollton, OH 1 of 5Laurels Of West Columbus, TheColumbus, OH 1 of 5Notting Hill of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 1 of 5Regency at FremontFremont, MI 1 of 5Regency at JacksonJackson, MI 1 of 5Regency at TroyTroy, MI 1 of 5Regency at WaterfordWaterford, MI 1 of 5Regency at Whitmore LakeWhitmore Lake, MI 1 of 5Royalton Manor, LLCSt Joseph, MI 1 of 5The Laurels Of HeathHeath, OH 1 of 5The Laurels Of Walden ParkColumbus, OH 1 of 5The Laurels of GalesburgGalesburg, MI 1 of 5The Laurels of HudsonvilleHudsonville, MI 1 of 5The Manor of NoviNovi, MI 2 of 5Laurels Of Athens, TheAthens, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Mt Vernon TheMount Vernon, OH 2 of 5Laurels Of Steubenville TheSteubenville, OH 2 of 5Regency At Bluffs ParkAnn Arbor, MI 2 of 5Regency at CheneDetroit, MI 2 of 5The Laurels Of GahannaColumbus, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of KetteringKettering, OH 2 of 5The Laurels Of University ParkRichmond, VA 2 of 5The Laurels Of Willow CreekMidlothian, VA 2 of 5The Laurels of BedfordBattle Creek, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of ChathamPittsboro, NC 2 of 5The Laurels of ColdwaterColdwater, MI 2 of 5The Laurels of Forest GlennGarner, NC 2 of 5The Manor of Farmington HillsFarmington Hills, MI 2 of 5Willowbrook ManorFlint, MI 3 of 5Autumnwood of DeckervilleDeckerville, MI 3 of 5Boulevard Temple Care Center, LLCDetroit, MI 3 of 5Brittany ManorMidland, MI 3 of 5Hamilton Respiratory and Nursing CenterHamilton, OH

Showing 40 of 80; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAUREL OHIO OPERATIONS GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2018
LAUREL HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2018
LAUREL ACQUISITION HOLDING CORPORATIONOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/30/2018
KHAN, ANISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018
QAZI, MOHAMMADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018
LAUREL HEALTH CARE COMPANYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
CASTELLANOS, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
NELMS, PATTIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO DATE PROVIDED
STOBB, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$465K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 32%Medicare 2%Other / private 66%

This home reported $465K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$255per resident / day
operating cost
$7,757per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$232per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365457. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next