Medilodge of Alpena

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 182 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 119.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize a change in condition for one Resident (R70) out of 23 residents reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice resulted in hospitalization and death. Findings include: Resident #70 (R70) Review of the admission record for R70, revealed an original admission to the facility on 3/11/24, with medical diagnoses including congestive heart failure (heart does not pump or fill adequately), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), morbid obesity, and muscle weakness. Review of progress note, dated 3/11/24 at 11:08 AM, read in part, .Resident admits to SNF (skilled nursing facility) for short term rehab . Review of physician progress note, dated 3/11/24 at 12:30 PM, read in part, .His goal is to rehab and discharge to home . Review of medication administration record (MAR), dated 7/1/24 through 7/10/24, revealed the following lab orders: a.) 7/3/24 - Lab to draw…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure wound for two Residents (R33 & R70) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. This deficient practice resulted in deterioration of pressure wound, sepsis, and hospitalization, requiring wound debridement for R70. Findings include: Resident #70 (R70) Review of the admission record for R70, revealed an original admission to the facility on 3/11/24, with medical diagnoses including congestive heart failure (heart does not pump or fill adequately), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), morbid obesity, and muscle weakness. Review of R70's progress note, dated 3/11/24 at 11:08 AM, read in part, .Resident admits to SNF (skilled nursing facility) for short term rehab . Review of R70's physician progress note, dated 3/11/24 at 12:30 PM, read in part, .His goal is to rehab and discharge to home . Review of R70's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2712549.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide bed mobility in a safe manner for one Resident (Resident #2) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision.Findings include:Resident #2 (R2)Review of R2's face sheet, dated 1/21/26, revealed an original admission to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including wedge compression fractures of third, fifth, and sixth thoracic vertebra, multiple fractures of the left ribs, left clavicle fracture, depression, and obesity. R2 also admitted into rehab services at the facility.A complaint dated 1/6/26 submitted to the State Agency (SA), read in part .On 1/1/26, (R2) was being rolled over for a bed check on to see if there was any waste in his pants. Staff member, (Certified Nurse Aide [CNA] F), was assigned to do the bed check. During the bed check, (R2) was manhandled, slammed into the bedrails and his shoulder was hurt.R2's minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notifications to residents and/or responsible parties for eight Residents (#2, #7, #9, #10, #11, #27, #59, & #87) of nine residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include:Resident #87 (R87) was transferred to the hospital Emergency Department (ED) on 3/13/25. There was no documentation in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicating the resident/responsible party were provided a bed hold notice. Resident #10 (R10) Review of a “Transfer Notice,” dated 6/4/2025 from R10's EMR, revealed the R10 was transferred to the emergency department on 6/4/2025 due to lethargy and decreased alertness. Further review of R10's EMR revealed the Resident was hospitalized following the transfer with return to the facility on 6/9/2025. In review of the EMR, it was noted there was no documentation or signed document indicating the Resident or the Resident's representative was provided with the facility bed hold policy at the time of transfer or thereafter. Resident #11 (R11) Review of a “Transfer Notice,”…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medications and labeling for three of three medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:30 AM, the A-hall medication cart was observed for medication storage and was found to have five insulin pens without an expiration date. One insulin pen had an opened date of [DATE] and would have been expired on [DATE] and remained in the active medication supply. On [DATE] at 9:40 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D, who was asked how long the insulins in her cart were good to use and replied, I don't know. I would have to ask the unit manager. LPN D was asked if she was unsure how long the insulin pens were good for how would she know when to discard them and replied, I guess I better find out. On [DATE] at 2:15 PM, the E-hall medication cart was observed for medication storage and was found to have 13 insulin pens and two insulin vials without an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to supply appropriate devices to ensure resident safety while smoking for one Resident (#104) of one resident reviewed for safe smoking. Findings include:Resident #104 (R104)On 8/19/2025 at 3:08 PM, R104 was observed in the hallway on her way to the smoking area outside. The smoking times listed for the facility were every two hours on odd hours of the clock. On 8/20/2025 at 1:17 PM, three resident smokers were observed in the outdoor pavilion smoking area accompanied by Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) A and one visitor. R104 was smoking a cigarette and was not wearing a smoking apron for protection against burns. Several ashtrays were on the table with one ashtray positioned directly in front of R104. While R104 was smoking, she backed her wheelchair away from the table and was observed not using the ashtray and flicking ashes from her burning cigarette into the air. The ashes were drifting in the air and not controlled. When questioned, R104…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent, with 3 errors identified, out of 25 medication administration opportunities observed. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 11.54 percent, and the potential for the administration of non-therapeutic doses of medication, and preparation of medication not according to manufacturer's instructions. Findings include: Error 1 and 2. Resident #94 (R94) - During observation of preparation of oral medications for R94 on 8/20/25 at 7:50 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D dispensed cyanocobalamin 500 micrograms (mcg), one tablet into a medication cup prepared for R94. LPN D completed her preparation for morning medication pass for R94 which included 0700 (7:00 AM) and 0800 (8:00 AM) medications. LPN D was asked how much cyanocobalamin was dispensed and replied, One. That's what the order says. LPN D was asked to check her dose of cyanocobalamin that was stored in her medication cart and replied, It is only 500 mcg. I need to give her two I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure current infection control practices were maintained for two Residents (#10 & #126) of 24 residents reviewed for infection control practices related to medication administration and reusable oxygen tubing.Findings include:Resident #10 (R10) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/17/2025, revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, diabetes and dementia. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R10 had moderate cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for transfers and mobility. Review of R10's active physician's orders revealed the following: Oxygen: Run [at] 3 L/Min [liters per minute] via NC [nasal cannula] 24 hours per day continuous. Every day and night shift. Start Date: 6/09/2025. Upon entering R10's room on 8/19/2025 at 12:50 PM, a portable oxygen concentrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided for two Residents (R8, and R9) of nine residents reviewed for quality of care by failing to: 1. provide diabetic foot care and 2. perform proper assessments and charting for new admissions. Findings include: This citation pertains to intake: MI00149326. Resident #8 (R8) Review of R8's MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 4/10/24, with active diagnoses that included: heart failure, depression, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. R8 scored a 15 of 15 on the BIMS assessment reflective of intact cognition. On 2/5/25 at 9:10 AM, an observation was made of R8 in her room sitting up on the side of her bed leaning over her bedside table. R8 was not wearing any socks or shoes. R8 was asked how she was doing and why her toenails were so long and replied, I know they are long and ugly. R8 was observed to have bilateral great toenails to be an inch long, her left foot second through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dispensed and destroyed per standards of practice and per facility policy for two Residents (#1 and #4) of nine residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: This citation pertains to intake: MI00149326. Resident #1 (R1) Review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on [DATE], with active diagnoses that included: heart failure, asthma, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety. R1 scored a 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment reflective of intact cognition. On [DATE] at 8:45 AM, R1 was observed in her room, finishing breakfast at her bedside table. An empty disposable medication cup labeled with R1's last name was observed next to her breakfast tray. R1 stated the floor nurse had recently dropped off her morning medications. When asked if the nurse ensured R1 had taken their medication before leaving the room, R1 replied, No, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0776 — isolated
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00149326. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure radiology exams were obtained as ordered for one Resident (#7) of 9 residents reviewed for radiology services. Findings include: Resident #7 (R7) Review of R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 3/8/24, with active diagnoses that included: hypertension, depression, diabetes mellitus, and gout. R7 scored a 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment reflective of intact cognition. On 2/5/25 at 11:20 AM, an interview was conducted with Medical Doctor (MD) E who stated he was displeased with the nursing staff at the facility because he ordered a bilateral [both side] foot x-ray for R7 on 1/20/25 and when he returned to the facility on 1/23/25 his x-ray was never ordered. On 2/26/25 at 2:45 PM, an interview was conducted with R7 in his room who was asked about his toes being run over by another female resident and replied, Yes, it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food in a manner that was a palatable (preferable) temperature for 19 of 23 residents interviewed. This deficient practice resulted in frustration with meals and the potential for weight loss and inadequate nutrition. Findings include: During an interview on 7/30/24 at 7:08 a.m., Confidential Resident C8 stated, the food is always cold, it doesn't matter what meal it is .the food is cold. During an observation on 7/30/24 at approximately 7:15 a.m., Confidential Residents C10 and C11 were talking to each other at a table in the dining room. C10 stated the food is going to be cold . C11 stated the food is always cold. During an interview on 7/30/24 at 8:16 a.m., Confidential Resident C12 stated the food is warm for the first time ever. During an interview on 7/30/24 at 8:44 a.m., Confidential Resident C13 stated the food is ok, but not that warm. During a confidential group interview on 7/30/24 at 10:30 a.m., 5 (C7, C14, C15, C16, C17) of 12 residents agreed the food is not palatable due to cold…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $733K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI