Medilodge of Ludington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 82.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.54 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.79 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2646749 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to appropriately stabilize 1 resident after a fall (R93), out of 2 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in increased pain, transfer to the hospital, and death. Findings:Resident #93 (R93)Review of an admission Record reflected R93 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, osteoarthritis, spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy (age-related degeneration of the spine involving disc wear and bone spurs without spinal cord compression), wedge compression fracture of T5-T6 (thoracic vertebra), and multiple fracture of ribs, bilateral. Review of a Nursing Evaluation Summary dated [DATE] reflected, (R93) was educated on call light use and the importance of using the call light system and the importance of calling for assistance, however, she has continuously been getting herself out of bed and into the bathroom on her own without calling for assistance.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess and treat two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) for acute changes, out of four residents reviewed, resulting in the need for emergency medical attention for both residents. Findings:Resident #1 (R1)Review of an admission Record revealed R1 was a [AGE] year-old-female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of presence of a cardiac pacemaker, a prosthetic heart valve, and implanted cardiac defibrillator, morbid obesity, high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of a physician progress note for R1, dated 06/27/25, reflected .(R1s) multiple medical issues necessitate frequent clinical evaluations, placing (R1) at moderate risk for readmission to the hospital without frequent monitoring and skilled intervention .frequent monitoring and management by trained clinicians is essential to safeguard (R1's)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes M100151387 and M100151421. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent hospitalization, monitor, assess, intervene, document, and provide appropriate care of nephrostomy tubes for 2 (R1 and R2) of two residents reviewed for nephrostomy care, resulting in hospitalization and infection. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R1 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility after a hospitalization on 3/31/25. Pertinent diagnoses include hydronephrosis (urine build up on kidney) with renal and ureteral calculous (kidney stones) obstruction (1/14/23), infection and inflammatory reaction due to nephrostomy catheter (3/31/25), acute pyelonephritis (kidney infection) (3/31/25), urinary tract infection (3/31/25), and Escherichia coli (E. coli, a bacterium that causes infection, 3/31/25). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R1 revealed she is cognitively intact had an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 3042861 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required two people to assist with transfers, were transferred by two people at all times for 4 residents (R5, R6, R7, and R9) out of 10 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Findings include:During an interview on 6/23/2026 at 10:30 AM, Confidential Informant (CI) K reported that there are 6 people on the hall she is assigned to that require two people for assistance with transfers but there is not enough staff to get to everyone in time leading to making residents wait for help. CI K said that when one person goes on break, staff can't help everyone who needs it. During an interview on 6/24/2026 at 8:12 AM, CI K reported that they will often transfer residents who require a mechanical lift with only one person. According to CI K, there should always be two people assisting with transfers that require either a lift or a sit to stand, but that isn't possible due to not being able to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 3042861 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were deployed in sufficient numbers to meet the needs of 6 residents (R3, R10, R5, R6, R7 and R9) out of 10 residents reviewed for staffing. Findings include:R3Review of a Face Sheet reflected R3 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, age related osteoporosis, orthostatic hypotension, repeated falls and depression. Review of a Care Plan initiated on 6/3/2025, reflected R3 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit related to her diagnoses and needed one person to assist with ambulation and toileting. The care plan also specified encourage use of visual prompts on beside table for reminder to use call light and walker. Further review of the entire care plan indicated R3 was at risk for falls and was on a toileting program to prevent falls and address R3's risk for incontinence. During an interview on 6/23/26 at 11:13 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective and current system of surveillance of staff illnesses to identify possible communicable diseases and infections to prevent the spread of an illness/outbreak for 2 of 18 residents (Residents #35 and #59) and all residents residing in the facility, reviewed for infection prevention and control.Findings:Employee Line ListReview of the February Infection Surveillance Report revealed:A Registered Nurse called off of work for GI with an onset date of 2/2/26.An Activities Staff Member called off of work for GI with an onset date of 2/9/26.A Registered Nurse called off of work for GI with an onset date of 2/11/26.A Certified Nursing Assistant called off of work for Other with an onset date of 2/13/26.A Certified Nursing Assistant called off of work for GI with an onset date of 2/13/26.A Certified Nursing Assistant called off of work for Other with an onset date of 2/16/26.An office staff member called off of work for Other with an onset…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #6 and #8) reviewed for nursing professional standards of practice.Findings:Resident #6 (R6) Review of an admission Record revealed R6 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: anxiety. Review of R6's Order Summary dated 8/13/26 revealed, LORazepam (Ativan) Tablet 0.5 MG Give 0.25 mg by mouth in the morning for anxiety Give 1/2 tab in the morning. Review of R6's Order Summary dated 8/12/26 revealed, LORazepam Tablet 0.5 MG Give 0.5 mg by mouth at bedtime for anxiety Give 1 tab PO at bedtime. Review of R6's Control Substance Record revealed that on 2/14/26 at 7:30 PM and 2/15/26 at 8:30 PM, R6 was dispensed Ativan 0.25 mg (1/2 tablet). Review of R6's February Medication Administration Record revealed that on 2/14/26 at 7:30 PM and 2/15/26 at 8:30 PM Ativan 0.5 mg (1 tablet) was documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
  Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes #: 2652909 and 2646749Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the knowledge and skills sets to support and assist residents experiencing agitation and confusion and implement meaningful behavioral interventions for 5 of 18 residents (Residents #67, #19, #91, #57, and #85), reviewed for behavioral health needs.Findings:Review of a Complaint Investigation Report dated 10/17/25 the following anonymous complaint, Complainant states that there are quite a few residents with mental health issues on the floor that aren't safe, and they should not be in this facility Complainant states that management should be coming in to assist when there are not enough staff present, but they don't .Resident #67 (R67)Review of an admission Record revealed R67 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R67, with a reference date of 2/8/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2646749Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely care to one (Resident #33) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Findings: Resident #33 (R33) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R33 was an [AGE] year-old male, last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of dementia and a stroke that caused weakness to the left side of his body. R33 was dependent on one staff person for all activities of daily living. During an observation on 3/09/26 at 10:02 AM, R33 laid in bed resting with his eyes closed, knees bent, and his heels resting on the mattress. The room smelled strongly of feces. R33 laid in a large, dried area of diarrhea. During an interview on 3/09/26 at 10:15 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F reported not checking on R33 since arriving on the unit at 7:00 AM. CNA F stated that she had not yet gotten to R33 due to being the only CNA on the north-east hall this am and the high acuity levels. During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to designate a representative was supported and accurately recorded in the medical record for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for resident rights.Findings:Resident #27 (R27)Review of an admission Record revealed R27 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, lymphedema, and severe morbid obesity.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R27, with a reference date of 3/9/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R27 was cognitively intact. Review of R27's Care Plan dated 9/8/23 revealed, Resident plans to stay long-term in the Skilled Nursing Facility.Actively involve the resident/family in the resident's plan of care.Encourage on-going involvement with family and friend(s).Review of R27's admission Record on 3/10/26 at 2:24 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: 2646749Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) implement the facility policy for pressure injury prevention and management 2.) ensure pressure injury assessments were comprehensive and accurate, and 3.) ensure treatments were ordered and completed for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for pressure injury prevention and management.Findings:Resident #27 (R27)Review of an admission Record revealed R27 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, lymphedema, and severe morbid obesity. Further review of R27's admission Record on 3/10/26 at 2:24 PM revealed that R27's niece (Family Member [FM] P) was documented as his Responsible Party-Clinical and Emergency Contact #1.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R27, with a reference date of 3/9/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, out of a total possible score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a comprehensive root cause analysis and implement meaningful interventions/preventative measures following a fall for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for accidents and hazards.Findings:Resident #27 (R27)Review of an admission Record revealed R27 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, lymphedema, and severe morbid obesity. Further review of R27's admission Record on 3/10/26 at 2:24 PM revealed that R27's niece (Family Member [FM] P) was documented as his Responsible Party-Clinical and Emergency Contact #1.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R27, with a reference date of 3/9/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R27 was cognitively intact. Review of R27's Witnessed Fall incident report dated 2/24/26 revealed: Incident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) and psychiatric provider in the process of the gradual dose reduction of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #83) reviewed for psychotropic medication use.Findings:Resident #83 (R83)Review of an admission Record revealed R83 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dementia with agitation with psychotic disturbances.During an observation on 03/09/2026 at 10:33 AM, R83 was observed in the hallway loudly yelling, I want to get out! She continued to yell in the hallway and self-propelled herself in her wheelchair across the hall and attempted to enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated R83 was always yelling and attempting to enter other rooms. The resident reported her behaviors were constant.Review of R83's Psychiatry Follow-up note dated 1/13/26 revealed, GDR quetiapine (seroquel) 25 mg tablet.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$40,404 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $40,404 — penalty dated 2025-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $485K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI