Medilodge of Sault Ste. Marie
1011 Meridian Road, Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (906) 635-1518 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $65,403 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-27)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 13.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.1% | 4.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.9% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.8% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.6% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.1% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.4% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.1% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.1% | 11.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.37 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 1.64 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.8%CMS range 41.1–57.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 8.9–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 4.7–14.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 80.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This deficiency pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MI00145815. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent, detect, and respond to an elopement resulting in the likelihood of serious harm, injury, impairment, or death for two Residents #4 and #5 (R4, R5) of three residents reviewed for elopement. Findings Include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 7/13/24 at 6:18 PM when R4 and R5 eloped from the facility undetected and whose location was subsequently identified and reported to be on a thoroughfare by a facility visitor. Regional Director of Operations F was notified of the immediate jeopardy on 7/25/24 at 4:27 PM. At that time, a written plan of correction for removal was requested from the facility. This surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the immediacy was removed on 7/25/24 at 5:45 PM, however, noncompliance remains at the potential for more than minimal harm due to sustained compliance which has not been verified by the State Agency (SA). Resident #4 (R4): Review of R4's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Deficient Practice Statement (DPS) has two parts: A and B. DPS A: This deficiency pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MI00142212. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision resulting in an elopement with the likely serious harm, injury, impairment or death for one Resident (#49) of one resident reviewed for accidents/hazards. Findings Include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 1/10/24 at 7:23AM when R49 was observed ambulating northbound in a southbound lane by an employee (Staff V) driving into work. Regional Senior Administrator GG was notified of the immediate jeopardy on 1/23/24 at 4:40PM. At that time, a written plan of correction for removal was requested from the facility. This surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the immediacy was removed on 1/23/24 at 5:40PM, however, noncompliance remained at the potential for more than minimal harm due to sustained compliance which has not been verified by the State Agency (SA).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2702621.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to promote the highest possible level of physical, mental, and psychological well-being for all 86 residents of the facility as evidenced by:Failure to ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) including routine incontinence care, bathing, shaving, turning and repositioning, and feeding.Failure to accommodate resident preferences including sleep/wake schedules, treatment times, and physical location within the facility.Failure to ensure a timely, dignified, and palatable meal service.Failure to maintain a restorative therapy program.Failure to respond to call lights within an appropriate time frame.These deficient practices resulted in harm when:Residents #4, #93, and #75 were forced to lay in her own excrement and urine for an extended period resulting in reported feelings of frustration, helplessness, humiliation, and anger and/or inference of these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2702621Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide routine incontinence care for one Resident #4 (R4) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care. This deficient practice resulted in harm including anger, frustration, helplessness, and sadness based on the reasonable person concept.Findings include: On 2/8/2026 at 1:55 PM a foul odor was noted while standing near the doorway of R4's room and R4 could be heard calling out Nurse? Nurse? Upon entering R4's room, R4 was observed lying in a fetal position in bed with her bottom sheet pulled off the mattress and gathered around her and a top sheet draped over her torso and lower body. Upon approaching the bed, an overpowering smell of urine and feces was noted. R4 reported she was waiting for staff to come assist her to clean up. R4 reported she was cold and stated, I peed myself. R4 was asked if she had used her call light to call for assistance, which was observed to be attached to the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2720794.Based in observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement timely interventions to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers for two Residents (#10 and (#14) of three residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in R10 developing an unstageable (a severe, full-thickness wound covered with necrotic tissue covering the wound bed causing inability to determine true wound depth) requiring surgical debridement (surgical removal of dead tissue), intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy and hospitalization.Findings include:Resident #10 (R10)Review of a confidential complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 1/12/2026 at 12:25 p.m. revealed an allegation that the facility failed to provide care to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers for R10. The information submitted cited, On 01/08/2026, [R10] was admitted to the hospital for the second time in about three months since being at [facility name]. [R10] was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake MI00153461. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a timely dressing change to a post-operative surgical area, correctly document an initial skin assessment, and communicate a change in wound condition to facility physician for one resident (Resident #11) of six residents reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice resulted in a secondary surgery which included an incision and drainage and re-closure of the wound, antibiotics, and hospital admission. Findings include: Resident #11 (R11) Review of R11's admission face sheet, dated 6/18/25, revealed an admission to the facility on 2/1/25 with diagnoses including fracture of the right hip, fusion of the spine, diabetes mellitus, adrenal insufficiency, and arthritis. The discharge date was recorded as 2/12/25. On 6/17/25 at 7:24 PM, an interview was conducted with Complainant I regarding the intake allegations and replied, I begged the facility to change the dressing on my back from my spinal surgery. The nurses told me they were only to do the dressing on my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Complaint Intake MI00145750 and Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MI00145875. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent two separate incidents of resident-to-resident sexual abuse for four Residents (Residents #1, #2, #4, and #5) of nine residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial harm when Resident #2 experienced ongoing feelings of embarrassment, anxiety, and fear. Findings Include: Resident #2 (R2): Review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 3/16/21 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all limbs and body from the neck down), dysarthria (difficulty speaking), adjustment disorder with anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Record review of R2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/21/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall with injury for one Resident (R3) of three residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in hospitalization where R3 required ten staples placed in the back of his head to close a laceration and then subsequently required transfer to a higher level of care hospital due to a subdural hematoma requiring an intensive care stay. Findings include: This citation is linked to intake MI00143648. On 4/16/24 an email was sent to the complainant regarding the allegations of the intake. No email was returned, no phone number was attached to the report from the State Agency, and the complainant was unable to be called via phone. Review of the SA intake MI00143648, dated 3/29/24, revealed - A concern for R3 and frequent falls at the facility in a short period of time. Complainant stated, This last fall that occurred 03/26/2024 at around 2:21 am when called I was told that (R3) had falling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This deficient practice pertains to Intakes 2809637, 3014371, 3014349, 3011210, 3021572, 3021668.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to promote the highest possible level of physical, mental, and psychological well-being for all 73 residents of the facility as evidenced by:Failure to ensure adequate supervision to prevent a resident-to-resident physical altercation.Failure to respond to call lights within an appropriate time frame.Failure to accommodate resident preferences including sleep/wake schedules.Failure to ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) including toileting and routine incontinence care.Findings include: Review of a facility investigation summary submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 5/11/26 revealed the following: .[On] 5/2/2026 [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A] assigned to D Hall, heard a crying noise coming from [Resident #1 (R1's)] .Upon entering the room staff observed [Resident #2 (R2)] on [R1's] bed. [CNA A] observed [R1] to be tearful with visible markings on her face. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis, resulting in the potential for all 86 residents and their representatives to be misinformed of current facility staffing.Finding include:During initial entry to the facility on 2/8/2026 at 12:20 p.m., the Daily Nurse Staffing Form, was observed posted on the wall at the end of E-Hall, near the nurses' station. The form was dated 2/6/2026 and the resident census was listed as 84. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), present at the time of the observation, reported the current census to be 86. During an interview on 2/9/2026 at 12:05 p.m., facility scheduler, Staff VV reported she was responsible for ensure the posting of the Daily Nurse Staffing Form, during her work week, which was Monday through Friday. Staff VV reported she provided pre-filled forms for nursing staff to complete and post on Saturdays and Sundays. Staff VV was asked how the forms could be accurate if filled out ahead of time to which she reported, nursing staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a qualified dietitian, other clinically qualified nutrition professional, and/or director of food and nutrition services who met the required qualifications in the timeframe allowed. Findings include: On 2/8/2026 at 3:15 PM, Dietary Director C was asked if he was a Certified Dietary Manager or if he had a food service manager certification and stated he is working on his Dietary Manager certificate but is not currently certified. He stated he is also not a Certified Professional Food Manager through a nationally accredited program. He stated he has many years of experience. On 2/9/2026 at 4:00 PM, during interview with the Nursing Home Administrator NHA it was discussed that the dietary manager was not a certified dietary manager nor a Certified Professional Food Manager and that he was unable to produce any certificates showing he was certified in a nationally recognized food manager program. NHA stated that Dietary Director C was supposed to have submitted these after hiring.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include: During a lunch meal observation on B Hall 2/8/2026 at 1:47 PM, CNA I was moving in and out of resident rooms bringing soiled meal trays back to the food cart for transport to the kitchen to be washed. At 1:51 PM on 2/8/2026, the food cart was observed to have six unserved meal trays remaining inside along with soiled food trays. Some of the soiled trays had been placed above the unserved trays and two soiled trays had been placed on the same shelf next to two unserved trays, touching and blocking service. CNA R looked into the cart and said, I'm not sure who did this. There is not supposed to be dirty trays in with the new trays. During a breakfast meal observation on D Hall 2/9/2026 at 9:43 AM, the food cart on the hall was observed. One tray remained to be served, and eight soiled trays had been returned from resident rooms and placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive and accurate facility assessment to ensure sufficient staffing levels for all 86 residents of the facility.Findings include:Review of the facility assessment, revised 9/16/25, revealed an average daily census of 72, ranging from a minimum of 64 residents to a maximum of 78 residents.Review of facility census numbers from 10/1/25 - 2/11/26 revealed 90 days the census exceeded the maximum census (78 residents) outlined by the facility assessment. The highest census in this timeframe was 87 residents on 2/6/26.Review of the facility assessment's resident acuity levels revealed the subsequent population percentages requiring maximum assistance or total dependency for the following activities of daily living (ADLs):Self-care (eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, donning and doffing footware [sic]): 37% Bed Mobility: 40%Transfers: 54% Walking: 51%Wheelchair/Scooter: 48% Review of the facility assessment's, Staffing Plan subsection revealed the following: .The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain a Quality Assistance and Process Improvement (QAPI) program which identified and prioritized quality deficiencies, systematically analyzed the underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies, and implemented effective corrective action or performance improvement activities to remedy those deficiencies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the safety and quality of life of all 86 residents at the facility.Findings include:On 2/11/26 at 9:47 AM, an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) regarding concerns of low staffing levels translating to quality-of-care concerns and systemic issues in several areas including assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), incontinence care, prompt and palatable meal service, positioning needs, and honoring resident preferences which were identified during the recertification process. Review of the facility's performance improvement projects with the NHA failed to reveal staffing levels concerns nor any other systemic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate high-risk, high-volume, and high-priority quality concerns from feedback obtained from direct care staff, residents, and resident representatives into an effective Quality Assistance and Process Improvement (QAPI) program. This deficient practice resulted in ongoing quality-of-care concerns and systemic issues in several areas including assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), incontinence care, prompt and palatable meal service, positioning needs, and honoring resident preferences which had the potential to affect all 86 residents in the facility. Findings include:Review of Quality Assistance Forms submitted to the facility Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed 15 grievances from staff, residents, and/or resident representatives related to low staffing concerns since June 2025.Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes since March 2025 revealed repeated staffing concerns, including excessively late mealtimes, for the previous 9 out of 11 months. On 2/9/26 at 2:00 PM, a confidential group…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2702621.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in a timely manner for six Residents (#33, #93, #90, #92, #94, & #91).Properly don (put on) personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering EBP rooms.Update infection control policies on an annual basis.Maintain sanitary medication and treatment carts.Ensure appropriate hand hygiene during feeding assistance.Ensure separation of unserved food trays and soiled meal trays within transport carts.These deficient practices resulted in the potential for the transmission of pathogens between residents and the spread of infectious organisms to all 86 residents in the facility. Findings include:On 2/8/26 at 12:33 PM, an observation was made of the B Hall medication cart and had two drinks sitting on top of the cart. One drink was coffee and the other was a can of name brand energy drink. On 2/8/26 at 12:40 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake 2702621. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the facility, resulting in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living to all residents. Findings Include:On 02/08/2026 at 1:34 PM observed a pink Caution Wet Floor sign on the floor sitting next to a waste container with a couple of inches of water in it in in the front entrance foyer across from the front door. The ceiling around the sky light above this area was observed water damaged. On 02/09/2026 at 8:45 AM during interview with Maintenance Director D stated that he has tried a few times to repair the roof but was told that it could void the roof warranty and not to attempt to repair any further.On 02/08/2026 at 2:55 PM observed the floor in the bathroom shared between rooms D 14 and D 16 was soiled and the paint on the door and door frame was observed chipped and worn off along the bottom of the door and casing.On 02/08/2026 at 2:57 PM in room D 11 observed damaged walls and paint missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist, set up, or place meals within reach for four Residents (#4, #47, #69, and #83) of four residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs.Resident #4 (R4) Review of R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 7/25/23 with diagnoses including malnutrition, depression and anxiety disorder. R4 scored 3 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment reflective of severe cognitive impairment. During an observation on 2/9/26 at 4:20 p.m., R3's lunch was sitting on her bedside table away from her bed and out of reach of the resident. The sandwich was covered with plastic wrap. During an observation on 2/10/26 at 8:32 a.m., R4 laid in bed with her meal try on the bedside table with the food and beverage covers over her food and beverage items. The food was out of the reach of the resident. Review of R4's menu card dated 2/10/26 read in part .Regular diet, thin liquids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake 2702621. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike dining environment for five of nine residents interviewed in a confidential group meeting. Findings include: During lunch observations on 2/8/2026 at 1:17 PM, the meal was delivered in food carts and served on trays. During observation on the A Hall and B Hall each tray included only disposable plastic utensils. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) R serving the meal stated disposable plastic utensils often came on the trays. CNA R said sometimes meal trays sat near the kitchen door in the dining room and did not get washed in time for the next meal. During breakfast observations on 2/9/2026 at 8:31 AM, the meal was delivered to the halls in food carts and served on trays. During this observation on the A Hall, each tray included regular forks and spoons and plastic disposable knives. On 2/11/2026 at 10:27 AM, the Food Service Manager/Staff C stated, It goes down the hall, and it does not come back. Staff C said the trays did not come back in time to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure medications, maintain the security for one medication cart of three medication carts and three of five treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include:On 2/8/26 at 12:37 PM, an observation was made of Resident #64 (R64) lying in his bed asleep with a full cup of medications sitting on his bedside table.On 2/8/26 at 12:38 PM, an observation was made of Resident #91 (R91) lying in her bed with a full cup of medications sitting on his bedside table. R91's medications were later identified as being morning medications. R91 also had a rescue inhaler on her bedside table identified as albuterol.An observation was made on 2/9/26 at 11:45 AM, of Resident #93 (R93) who had a topical ointment on her bedside table. R93 states it is her ointment mupirocin. During an observation on 2/8/26 at 12:53 PM, A Hall treatment cart was unlocked with a tube of diclofenac sodium topical gel 1% and an opened can of soda pop on top of treatment cart.During an interview on 2/8/26 at 1:26 PM, Registered Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2702621Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure palatable meals were served at preferred and appetizing temperatures for six of nine residents interviewed in a confidential group meeting, and for one Resident (#93) of one resident who voiced concerns about food temperatures. Findings include:On 2/9/26 at 2:00 PM, a confidential group interview was conducted where six residents stated the food delivered at mealtimes is often cold. One Confidential Resident (CR) stated, Sometimes it's cold, other times it's lukewarm. Another CR indicated food trays either sit in the serving window or in food delivery carts for extended periods of time which contributes to the cold food temperatures. One CR revealed they had bought hairnets online in attempt to assist delivering meal trays due to ongoing staffing problems and were upset when the facility would not allow it. The CR indicated they frequently noticed meal trays stacking up in the serving window…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2702621.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to honor resident food preferences or failed to offer substitutes or alternative menu items for 19 of 24 residents (#4, #6, #12, #13, #22, #23, #24, #30, #31, #37, #R41, #47, #48, #77, & #82) and four Residents in a confidential group meeting) reviewed for nutritional services.Findings include:During the lunch meal observation on 2/8/2026 at approximately 1:15 PM, the meal tray cards on each tray specified what each resident preferred or had been ordered by the Physician. Resident #30 (R30) R30 had a meal tray card which indicated, Standing Orders: 8 fl oz (fluid ounces) Assorted Fruit Juices. R30 received 4 oz orange juice. Resident #22 (R22) R22 had a meal tray card which indicated Standing Orders: 4 fl oz Assorted Fruit Juices (lemonade, cran[berry], or apple). R22 received 4 oz orange juice. Resident #48 (R48) R48 had a meal tray card which indicated, Standing Orders: 8 fl oz Assorted Fruit Juices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0810 — patternProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dining adaptive equipment for four Residents (#6, #23, #30 & #48) of five residents reviewed for dining assistive devices. Findings include: During the lunch meal observation on 2/8/2026 at 1:15 PM, four meals did not receive the prescribed special adaptive equipment per the meal tray cards:Resident #6 (R6)R6 had a meal tray card which indicated Adap. Equip: (Adaptive Equipment) 2-handle Cup, Built-Up Utensil Handles, red plate. R6 received plastic silverware but did not receive silverware with built -up utensil handles and did not receive the specialty red plate.Resident #23 (R23)R23 had a meal tray card which indicated Adap. Equip including straws. No straws were observed on R23's tray.Resident #30 (R30)R30 had a meal tray card which indicated Adap. Equip including 2-handled cup, and straw. R30's tray did not include a straw or beverage in a 2-handled cup.Resident #48 (R48)During the breakfast meal observation on 2/9/2026 at 9:01 AM, R48 had a meal tray card which indicated Adap. Equip including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for three Residents (#10, #12, & #30) of three Resident reviewed for resident choice.Findings include: Resident #10 (R10) According to the medical record, R10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (the most severe form of cerebral palsy characterized by extreme muscle stiffness and poor motor control in all four limbs and trunk), need for assistance with personal care, major depressive disorder and chronic pain syndrome. R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15, indicating R10 was cognitively intact. R10's functional status assessment revealed substantial assistance from staff to roll right or left, total dependence on staff to sit from lying down and total dependence on staff to transfer to and from a bed to a chair (or wheelchair). On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive information was in place for one Resident (#11) of two residents reviewed for accuracy of advanced directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time).Findings include:Resident #11 (R11)The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R11 revealed an admission on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of autistic disorder (a lifelong neurological condition characterized by difficulties with social communication, restricted interests and repetitive behavior). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment could not be completed as the resident was rarely/never understood. The Physician Orders included Full Resuscitation, dated as 8/17/2022. R11's EMR was noted to have a chart banner on each page indicating Code Status: (Advanced Directives) Full Resuscitate.The documents filed in the EMR included a form titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect the privacy of medical records for one Resident (#99) of one resident reviewed for privacy of medical records.Findings include:During an observation on 2/11/26 at 8:22 a.m., A medication cart at the beginning of C Hall had a facility laptop computer open with R99's personal health information present on the screen with no facility staff present near the medication cart.During an interview on 2/11/26 at 8:23 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) U reported, I know I am not supposed to leave the screen opened with resident information available for anyone to have access to.During an interview on 2/11/26 at 9:38 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) acknowledged medical record information was not secured when the LPN walked away from the medication cart.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to intake #2702621 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one Resident (#93) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation of property.Findings include:Resident #93 (R93)The facesheet for R93 had an original admission to the facility on 1/29/26 with diagnoses including fracture of the left tibia/fibula (both lower leg bones were broken).According to R93's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was completed and a score of 15/15 indicated R93 was cognitively intact.During an interview on 2/8/26 at 2:15 PM, R93 stated a night shift nurse took her pain pills (four hydrocodone 10 milligram (mg)/325 mg acetaminophen a narcotic pain medication) and she was having increased pain and wanted to take one. R93 stated that she brought them into the facility with her when she was admitted from the hospital.R93's inventory sheet, dated 1/28/26, was reviewed and did not list any medications.Review of R93's progress note,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to intake #2702621 Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for one resident (Resident #93) out of one resident reviewed for reporting abuse. Findings include:Resident #93 (R93)Face sheet for R93 had an original admission to the facility on 1/29/26 with medical diagnoses including fracture of the left tibia/fibula (both lower leg bones were broken).According to R93's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated R93 was cognitively intact.During an interview on 2/8/26 at 2:15 PM, R93 stated a night shift nurse took her pain pills (four hydrocodone 10 milligram (mg) / 325 mg acetaminophen a narcotic pain medication) and she was having increased pain and wanted to take one. R93 stated that she brought them into the facility with her when she was admitted from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring investigating of an alleged resident misappropriation of medication for one Resident (#93) out of one resident reviewed for investigation of abuse.Findings include:Resident #93 (R93)The facesheet for R93 had an original admission to the facility on 1/29/26 with medical diagnoses including fracture of the left tibia/fibula (both lower leg bones were broken).According to R93's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated R93 was cognitively intact.During an interview on 2/8/26 at 2:15 PM, R93 stated a night shift nurse took her pain pills (four hydrocodone 10 milligram (mg)/325 mg acetaminophen a narcotic pain medication) and she was having increased pain and wanted to take one. R93 stated that she brought them into the facility with her when she was admitted from the hospital.The Director of Nursing (DON) was asked on 2/9/26 at 9:00 AM and 2:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain physician dietary orders for the resident's immediate care for two Residents (#91 & #94) of two records reviewed for admission orders.Findings include: Resident #94 (R94) During an interview on 2/8/2026 at 3:05 PM, R94 was observed in his bed and said, I am mad. I got here Friday and today I did not get breakfast or lunch. I am going to call the administrator. He said he had only had a coffee and donut holes brought in by his visitor and he pointed to the empty disposable coffee cup and empty donut box. R94's roommate stated, I just went down and told the kitchen that he did not get any food today. During an interview on 2/08/2026 at 3:07 PM, Dietary Manager (DM/Staff) C said, I guess he got here yesterday. I will deliver it. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 5:31 PM. The Physician Orders contained a diet order for R94 dated 2/8/2026 at 3:27 PM. The diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to intake 2702621Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided individualized care to promote dignity and enhance their quality of life for three Residents #4 (R4), #47 (R47) and #93 (R93) of five residents reviewed for ADL's.Findings include: Resident #4 (R4) Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed admission to the facility on 7/25/23, with active diagnoses that included: depression, anxiety disorder, malnutrition, and osteoporosis. Further review of MDS Section GG, required staff to provide R4 supervision/touching assistance for turning or repositioning in bed. Further review of the MDS Section M revealed R4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. During an observation on 2/10/26 at 8:30 a.m. until 10:30a.m., R4 was laying on her back in her bed with the head of the bed slightly elevated. None of the staff went into the room to assist R4 to turning/repositioning in bed or encourage R4 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2702621.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate bowel protocol in a timely manner for two Residents (#25 and #69) and failed to complete an assessment upon admission for one Resident (#91) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:Resident #91 (R91) The facesheet for R91 had an original admission to the facility on 2/6/26. According to R91's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated R91 was cognitively intact. On 2/8/26 at 2:33 PM, R91 provided a notebook where she had been writing about her experience at the facility since her admission on [DATE] at approximately 6:20 PM. R91 had written she was told dinner was on the way and at 7:15 PM still did not get dinner on 2/7/26. During her arrival staff scurried in, did a few things and flew back out of her room. R91 stated, I had no idea what was happening with the staff and there I was just lying in bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide restorative therapy services for two Residents (#15 & #83) of two Residents reviewed for restorative therapy needs.Findings include:Resident #83 (R83) On 2/8/2026 at 2:50 PM, an observation of R83 revealed she was sitting in a reclined position in bed with her meal tray in front of her. R83 said she had just finished lunch and was fed by staff. When asked about her left contracted hand, R83 stated staff do not work with her on it, and she is supposed to have a brace on but it is the weekend, so nothing is happening. On 2/10/2026 at 12:37 PM, during a follow-up interview, R83 stated she was not getting restorative therapy and had not had it for a long time. R83 stated she was supposed to have a splint for her hand, and she needed assistance putting it on. R83 said, They do not put it on enough. During an interview on 2/10/2026 at 12:34 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) TT stated, the Restorative Aide put on the splints and did the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2702621.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for one Resident #6 of six residents reviewed for falls and ensure the safety of one Resident #12 for smoking of three residents reviewed for smoking.Findings include:Resident #6 (R6) Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed admission to the facility on 4/25/25, with diagnoses including seizure disorder or epilepsy, fracture, and anxiety disorder. R6 scored 9 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment reflective of moderate cognitive impairment. During an observation on 2/9/26 at approximately 9:28 a.m., R6 was in bed with his bed in a high position and two floor mats [a specialized shock-absorbing safety device placed on the floor beside a resident's bed to reduce the impact and risk of injury from falls] were folded behind the chair in R4's room. Review of R4's Care plan revealed Focus area resident is at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to administration of PRN (as needed) opioid pain medications for two Residents (#8 & #15) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:Resident #8 (R8)Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/24/2025, revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, and a history of falling.Review of R8's physician orders revealed the following: Oxycodone-acetaminophen [opioid pain medication] Oral Tablet 5-325 MG [milligram]. Give 1 tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for pain. Start Date: 1/21/2026 [1:45 p.m.].Review of R8's February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR), located in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R8 was administered doses of the ordered oxycodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure implementation of physician orders for hospice services for one Resident (#8) and communication with hospice providers and receipt of hospice documentation for one Resident (#4) of two residents reviewed for hospice services.Findings include: Resident #8 (R8) A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R8 on 2/9/2026, revealed a physician's order for Hospice consultation dated 1/21/26. The EMR also included a Social Services Progress Note dated 1/28/2026 3:34 PM which read, Note Text: This writer reached out to the guardian in order to provide hospice services through (name of Hospice Organization). Guardian consented to hospice consultation. Referral issued. No hospice consultation follow-up was found in the EMR. On 2/9/2026 at 5:06 PM, the hospice consultation results were requested from the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). On 2/10/2026 at 8:00 AM, the hospice consultation results were requested from the Director of Nursing (DON).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2645585.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately reconcile medications on admission and failed to monitor blood glucose levels according to facility policy and professional standards of practice for one Resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for quality of care.Findings include:This citation pertains to intake 2645585.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately reconcile medications on admission and failed to monitor blood glucose levels according to facility policy and professional standards of practice for one Resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for quality of care.Findings include:Resident #10 (R10)Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/7/2025, revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had severe cognitive impairment. Review of R10's diagnoses list from the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed active diagnoses including dementia, diabetes with long-term use of insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2630912 and 2666718.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for five Residents (#10, #11, #12, #13, and #16) of five residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for unrecognized and continued abuse.Findings include:Resident #12 (R12) and Resident #13 (R13)Review of a facility incident report submitted to the State Agency on 9/20/2025 at 3:11 p.m. revealed the following: Resident [R12] struck out with closed fist and made contact with upper arm of another resident [R13]. Residents were immediately separated. Skin and pain assessments completed with no injuries noted. Police notified. Guardians and physician notified. Medication regiment review to be completed on [R12] and to be supervised during meals. 5-day investigation to follow.Review of the facility investigation summary received by the SA on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake MI00153461. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary community shower room area for the facility population. Findings include: On 6/17/25 at 7:24 PM, an interview was conducted with Complainant I regarding their concerns about a recent short stay at the facility. The complainant stated the D-Hall shower had mold growing around the shower drain and at the base of the shower, and it, looked disgusting and was gross. The complainant felt the facility was doing a very poor job cleaning and was mortified to take a shower in the shower room. Complainant I stated they were glad they were in a shower chair during their shower to avoid making direct contact with the shower floor. On 6/18/25 at 8:00 AM, an observation of the D-hall shower room found mold in the double shower along the base of the shower on the right and back side and around the shower drain. On 6/18/25 at 8:05 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F who was responsible for assisting with showers. CNA F was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intakes MI00150502 and MI00150541. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from abuse for four Residents (#21, #22, #23, #26) of four residents reviewed for sexual abuse. Findings include: Resident #20 (R20), Resident #21 (R21), Resident #22 (R22) On 2/11/25, the State Agency (SA) received an initial facility reported incident summary which stated, Resident (R20) kissed (R22) on the cheek. (R20) also touched resident (R21) on the thigh. An Investigation Summary was received by the SA on 2/20/25 and read in part, R20 had multiple diagnoses including dementia with agitation, dementia with psychotic disturbance, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. R20 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R22 had multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease with mood disturbance and a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognition. R21 had multiple diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intakes MI00150502 and MI00150541. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of sexual abuse for one Resident (#20) of one resident reviewed for sexual abuse. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for additional exposure to sexual abuse for cognitively impaired resident, including Residents (#21, #22, #23, #26). Findings include: On 2/11/25, the State Agency (SA) received an initial facility reported incident summary which stated, Resident (R20) kissed (R22) on the cheek. (R20) also touched resident (R21) on the thigh. An Investigation Summary was received by the SA on 2/20/25. The investigation summary stated, The incident was reported to (the SA) as abuse. The one witness listed in the report was documented as Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A. On 2/14/25, the SA received an additional initial facility reported incident summary which stated, Resident (R20) touched (R22) on the thigh near the genital area. Before we had the opportunity to get him (R20) on a 1:1 (a system to closely monitor R20)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff as evidenced by confidential resident and family interviews and payroll data analysis. This deficient practice resulted in embarrassment and worry on the part of residents whose needs were not met with potential to impact all 74 residents living in the facility. Findings include: A review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) report indicated excessively low staffing levels and a one star staffing rating in the fourth quarter (July1-September 30). A review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool for Medilodge of [NAME] Ste. [NAME] 08/2023 through 07/2024 indicated Each hall is staffed based on resident acuity. Resident acuity is discussed each morning at the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) morning meeting. IDT discusses current resident acuity on each unit, admission planned for the next 48 hours and discharges planned for the next 48 hours. Staffing levels are adjusted based on the evaluation of acuity. The charge nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for 6 of 6 residents of a total census of 74, who had personal refrigerators in their rooms. This deficient practice has the potential to result in personal food spoilage and contribute to an overall unsanitary condition in the rooms. Findings include: On 1/7/25 between 3:00 PM and 4:30 PM, resident rooms were observed for the presence of personal refrigerators. Six residents were identified having personal refrigerators which stored both perishable (lunch meats, dairy products, etc.) and non-perishable foods (canned beverages). Rooms identified with personal refrigerators were: A2; B7, B5, D9, D8, and D15. None of the six observed refrigerators were provided with a thermometer. Internal temperature measurements were made with an infrared thermometer which detected temperatures varying between 37°F and 54°F. No evidence of temperature logs were observed in proximity to the refrigerator units. On 1/8/25 at approximately 8:00 AM, a list of all residents having personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated promptly and revised appropriately for four Residents (R15, R24, R25, and R36) out of 18 Resident care plans reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in care plans which did not reflect resident needs. Findings include: Resident #15 (R15) On 11/5/24 a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was submitted to the State Agency (SA) which read in part, Incident Summary: Resident #23 (R23) was witnessed yelling (obscenities) at resident (R15) staff immediately intervened and separated the 2 residents. The care plan for R15 included a Focus: Resident has impaired cognitive function related to disorganized thinking, Traumatic Brain Injury. Date Initiated: 08/03/2023. This care plan was updated 1/8/25 with an intervention to prevent further altercations which read, Make sure (initials of R23) is not seated close to resident (R15). Redirect resident by offering coffee or going for a walk when frustrated. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 10:44 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) V stated she worked throughout…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately store and label respiratory equipment, provide supplemental oxygen, and provide Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy according to physicians' orders for four Residents (#31, #46, #7, and #57) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care services. Findings include: Resident #31 (R31) On 1/7/25 at 11:50 a.m., R31 was observed wearing a nasal cannula (a tube used to deliver supplemental oxygen). The cannula tubing was observed dated 12/25/24. The oxygen concentrator was observed set to deliver 2.5 liters per minute (lpm) of supplemental oxygen. Physician's orders for R31 included an order for oxygen tubing/filter change every week to be changed by [name of oxygen supplier] weekly during rounds on Thursdays. Another physician's order for R31 read Oxygen: RUN @ [2]L (liters)/MIN (minute) VIA [X]N/C (nasal Cannula) . [X] CONTINUOUS. On 1/8/25 at 2:45 p.m., R31's O2 (oxygen) concentrator was set to deliver 3 lpm of supplemental O2. R31 said she did not know who changed the flow rate of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Secure one topical medication, 2. Securely lock a treatment cart and, 3. Store medications properly for one of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This deficient practice had the potential for medication errors, drug diversion, and ingestion of medications inappropriate for consumption for cognitively impaired residents. Findings include: On 1/7/25 at 11:58 AM, an observation was made of an unlocked and unattended treatment cart on the A-hall. This Surveyor opened the treatment cart which contained eight topical medication creams and various wound care supplies. One of the wound care supplies normal saline 500 ml (milliliters) was opened with approximately 300 ml of liquid and had no date to show when it was opened. On 1/7/25 at 12:07 PM, an observation was made of R21 in her room. R21 was sitting in her wheelchair. During an observation of R21's bathroom a topical medication cream identified as Nystat (Nystatin [topical antifungal agent] was observed sitting on a ledge. Review of R21's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse for one Resident (#37) of four residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in mental distress and anguish after a staff member used inappropriate language towards a resident. Findings include: This citation is linked to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MI00148016. Resident #37 (R37) Review of R37's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 2/16/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a stroke referring to damage to tissues in the brain due to loss of oxygen), dementia, muscle weakness (generalized), difficulty walking, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of R37's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/1/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the FRI submitted to the State Agency (SA) included an incident summary which read, in part: .received report from [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) M] that two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one Resident (#25) of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion. This deficient practice had the potential for development and/or worsening of contractures, pain, and skin breakdown. Findings include: Resident #25 (R25) Review of R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 2/23/22 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, contractures, lack of coordination, and dementia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/25/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. During a room visit on 1/7/25 at 12:47 PM, R25 was alert but non-verbal in bed grasping his TV remote with his clenched fists. He did not have any protective device such as a rolled cloth in his contracted closed fists to prevent skin breakdown. When asked if he could open his fists, he did not make eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate medically related social services for one Resident (R36) of four residents reviewed for social services care. Findings include: Resident 36 (R36) Review of R36's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 5/31/24 with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of R36's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/4/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency (SA) dated 12/28/24 included an incident summary which read, in part: .[R36] was behind resident [Resident #50 (R50)] in the hall and reached up to grab resident [R50] on the shoulder, grabbing at his t-shirt and causing scratches to his right upper back and shoulder . Review of R36's Plan of Care revealed the following focus, initiated on 6/1/24: Resident has impaired communication . maintain eye contact, approach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was below 5% when three medication errors were observed from a total of 26 opportunities for one Resident (#7) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 11.54%. Findings include: Resident 7 (R7) Review of the medical record revealed R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, heart disease, sleep apnea, and hypertension. Record review of R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/7/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition. On 1/9/25 at 8:20 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) C was observed preparing and administering medications to R7. RN C prepared two insulin glargine pens, one with 9 units and the other with 16 units to total a total of 25 units. RN C also prepared an insulin needle for R7 with 4 units of insulin lispro…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective infection control practices and the appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for two Residents (#9 and #38) of seven residents reviewed for infection prevention and control. This deficient practice resulted in the potential transmission of communicable disease and infectious organisms to all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Resident #38 (R38) On 1/7/25 at approximately 11:35 a.m., R38's room was observed with three signs posted on the door indicating isolation for contact precautions, airborne precautions, and droplet precautions. The door to the room was open, and two residents were observed in the room (R38 and R38's room mate). The sign for airborne precautions read, in part: .Door to room must remain closed . There was no indication on the signage indicating which isolation precaution pertained to which resident. Resident #9 (R9) At approximately 11: 38 a.m. on 1/7/25, R9's room was noted to have four signs posted on the door indicating isolation for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-30 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespreadNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This deficiency pertains to Complaint Intake MI00145457. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an employee's criminal conviction to the Stage Agency (SA). This deficient practice resulted in the potential to jeopardize the safety and welfare of all 69 residents of the facility. Findings include: On 7/25/24 at 9:24 AM, a phone interview was conducted with a confidential staff member who expressed concern that a different confidential employee [Confidential Staff R] had a criminal conviction involving brandishing a firearm in public that was unknown to facility administration. The confidential staff member verbalized concern regarding the safety of the facility residents. On 7/30/24 at 11:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Regional Director of Clinical Services G, and Regional Director of Clinical Services F who stated they were unaware of Confidential Staff R's criminal conviction. The NHA stated, We [administration] were under the impression the charges were dropped. On 7/30/24 at approximately 11:55 AM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This deficiency pertains to Complaint Intakes MI00145340 and MI00145457. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to address the care, needs, and safety of the entire facility population. This deficient practice resulted in unmet care needs and the potential for serious safety issues for all 69 residents of the facility. Findings include: Review of Complaint Intake MI00145457 submitted to the State Agency (SA) read, in part: .I am an RN [Registered Nurse N] . are we are currently understaffed. We have been understaffed for some time, but it has gotten to the point where it is unsafe for our residents . Last Friday [6/28/24] on night shift there was only 1 LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse] and 3 CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants] in the building caring for 80 residents. Our DON [Director of Nursing] was aware of this and said she was coming in to help but then she stopped answering her phone and never showed up. Review of timecards from 6/28/24 - 6/29/24 revealed LPN P was the sole nurse on duty for 4.5 hours (2:00 AM - 6:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This deficiency pertains to Complaint Intake MI00145750. This Deficient Practice Statement (DPS) has two parts: A and B. DPS A: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential sexual abuse for one Resident (#5) of nine residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in no investigation into the allegation of abuse by the State Agency (SA) and the potential for continued abuse. Findings include: Resident #4 (R4): Review of R4's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 5/16/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and diabetes. Record review of R4's most recent MDS assessment, dated 5/20/24, revealed a BIMS score of 7, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Resident #5 (R5): Review of R5's EMR revealed admission to the facility on 5/16/24 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, congestive heart failure, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. Record review of R5's most recent MDS assessment, dated 5/20/24, revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicative of intact cognition. On 7/30/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of potential sexual abuse between two Residents (Residents #4 and #5) of nine residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Resident #4 (R4): Review of R4's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 5/16/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and diabetes. Record review of R4's most recent MDS assessment, dated 5/20/24, revealed a BIMS score of 7, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Resident #5 (R5): Review of R5's EMR revealed admission to the facility on 5/16/24 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, congestive heart failure, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. Record review of R5's most recent MDS assessment, dated 5/20/24, revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicative of intact cognition. On 7/30/24 at 10:30 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) O regarding the protocol for reporting allegations of abuse. CNA O stated during a shift on 7/30/24 she walked into R5's room and observed him lying in bed with his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to MI00145233. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals at regular times in accordance with resident preferences and expectations for five residents (R2, R4, R6, R12 and R13) of 8 residents reviewed for timely meal delivery. This deficient practice resulted in frustrated hungry residents. Findings include: On 6/25/24 a complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) which alleged the meals were not served in a timely manner with the evening meal arriving as late as 7:00 PM. On 6/26/24 at 12:15 PM, an observation of the noon meal revealed the main dining room trays were being served. Several residents on the A Hall had chosen to eat in their rooms and were waiting for their meals. On 6/26/24 at 12:22 PM, Resident #2 (R2) was visiting with his wife in his room. His wife stated she was here daily and said the facility serves the dining room first and then the hall trays are served. Sometimes R2 goes to the dining room, but often prefers to eat in his room. R2's wife stated, there is often a long wait. R2's wife…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to MI000145229: Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and assure the timely administration and physician notification of unavailable ordered medications for two residents (R1 and R11) from a total sample of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in delayed administration of ordered antibiotics without physician notification to combat known infections. Findings include: On 6/21/24, the State Agency (SA) received a complaint regarding the administration of antibiotics for urinary tract infections for Resident #1 (R1). The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) of R1 revealed an admission date of 5/23/24 with diagnoses which included a personal history of urinary tract infections (UTI). The physician orders for R1 included Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal Capsules (an antibiotic) to be given twice a day for seven days with a start date of 6/18/24 at 20:00 (8:00 PM). The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the medication was not available and was not given on 6/18/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This deficient practice has two different DPS statements labeled part A and B. DPS A Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly don personal protective equipment (PPE) for three Residents (R3, R9, and R10) who were placed in Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) rooms of three reviewed for infection control. This citation is linked to intakes MI00142467 AND MI00142753. On 4/16/24 at 12:35 PM, an interview was conducted with Complainant M and was asked about the nature of the allegations. Complainant M replied, There was an isolation room near my room in the same hallway and staff was not putting on protective gowns or shields and I am not sure what the person had. I think maybe Covid-19, but then they would come and assist me. I don't feel like that was right. The staff should have been wearing protection. On 4/17/24 at 10:50 AM, a facility tour was taken, and the following observations were made locating residents for sample who were in EBP rooms down three different hallways. On 4/17/24 at 11:00 AM, an observation was made of R3 in his room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain physician order for indwelling catheter device for one Resident (R3) of three reviewed for bowel and bladder care. On 4/17/24 at 11:00 AM, an observation was made of R3 in his room lying in his bed with an indwelling catheter bag hanging off the left side of his bed. On 4/17/24 at 12:20 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) H and was asked why R3 had an indwelling urinary catheter and replied, I would have to ask the nurse, but he has had it ever since he came back from the hospital. Review of R3's progress notes, dated 3/18/24 through 4/17/24, revealed, an original admission on [DATE] to the facility, a transfer out to a local hospital on 3/26/24, and a return to the facility on 3/28/24. Review of R3's progress note, dated 3/28/24 at 4:33 PM, read in part, Resident arrived .transferred to bed .has indwelling catheter . Review of R3's progress note, dated 3/28/24 at 5:46 PM, read in part, Called [facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-29 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure exhaust ventilation was functioning in resident bathrooms, on two halls, serving 48 of a total 64 residents. This deficient practice has the potential to result in noxious odors permeating the resident environment rendering the living conditions unpleasant and uncomfortable. Findings include: On 1/22/24 at 11:45 AM, noxious odors were noted throughout the A and D halls. On 1/22/24 at 4:30 PM, in response to the presence of continued noxious odors on the A wing, an investigation was initiated into determining the functioning of the exhaust ventilation system for resident bathrooms. The bathrooms serving the following rooms were inspected for functioning exhaust by placing a paper towel over the ceiling mounted duct cover and determining if there was adequate negative pressure to hold the paper in place. The failure to hold the towel in place was deemed a failure for that bathroom's exhaust system. This failure was noted in the bathrooms serving the following resident rooms: A Hall 3/5; 10/12; 11/13; 14/16; 15/17 D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the exercise of resident rights for one Resident (R170) of 17 residents reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice prevented R170 from exercising her resident right and desire to have family members present during a telehealth visit. Findings include: Review of R170s Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/16/24, revealed admission to the facility on 1/12/24 with active diagnoses that included osteoporosis, pubis fracture, anxiety, and depression. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 6 of 15 on the admission MDS, reflective of severe cognitive impairment. A BIMS score completed on the day of discharge, 1/25/24, was 12 of 15, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R170's admission Record revealed R170 was their own responsible party and did not have an activated Durable Power of Attorney or Guardian making their decisions. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 9:18 a.m., Family Member (FM) I reported they were related to R170. FM I said they were discharging R170 from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, quarterly nursing assessments (including elopement and fall risk assessments), and nutritional assessments for two residents (Resident #49 and #31) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unmet care needs including inadequate supervision to prevent elopement and inadequate nutritional interventions to prevent unnecessary weight loss. Findings include: This deficiency pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MI00142212. Resident #49 (R49): Review of R49's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a most recent admission to the facility on 9/29/23 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease with dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movements), cognitive communication deficit, dementia, difficulty in walking, and history of falling. Record review of R49's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Quality of Care per professional standards of practice for one Resident (R9) of two residents reviewed for quality of care for adequate seating and positioning for pressure relief and completion of activities of daily living (adls). This deficient practice resulted in pain and feelings of frustration and helplessness. Findings include: Review of R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all a person's limbs and body from the neck down), anoxic brain damage (brain injury caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain), neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control from neurological compromise), adjustment disorder with anxiety, depression, muscle weakness, muscle spasm, and aphasia (a communication disorder from brain damage). The assessment revealed R9 required moderate assistance with eating, maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hygienic catheter care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) for one Resident (R29) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for cross-contamination of infectious organisms and the increased likelihood of UTIs. Findings include: Resident R29 Review of R29's Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/23/23, revealed R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with active diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy and UTI. R29 scored 5 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of severe cognitive impairment. R29 was able to be understood and understand others. Suprapubic catheter and peri care was observed on 1/24/24 at 9:45 a.m., performed by Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) N and M. CNA N performed the care, with the physical assistance of CNA M. Both CNAs washed their hands and donned clean gloves. CNA N placed a wet washcloth in a plastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions for one (Resident #31) of sixteen residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unnecessary weight loss. Findings include: Resident #31 (R31): Review of R31's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission the facility on 12/4/23 with diagnoses including fracture of the right femur, congestive heart failure, and osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle). Review of R31's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R31's weight history revealed she weighed 123.0 lbs. (pounds) on 12/5/23 and weighed 106.2 lbs. on 1/2/24 for a total weight loss of 16.8 lbs. This resulted in a 13.7% weight loss within an approximate 30-day period. On 1/23/24, R31 weighed 95.2 lbs., which represented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified and involved in implementing nutritional interventions for significant weight loss in one (Resident #31) of 16 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in the lack of physician coordination related to nutritional decline. Findings Include: Resident #31 (R31): Review of R31's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission the facility on 12/4/23 with diagnoses including fracture of the right femur, congestive heart failure, and osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle). Review of R31's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. On 1/22/24 at 1:28 PM, R31 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room with a meal tray sitting in front of her on an overbed table. A hamburger on a bun, a serving of French fries, a full bowl of cottage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to acquire and administer medications to meet the need of two Residents (R26 & R58) of five residents reviewed during medication administration observation. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for infection and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Review of R26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/23, revealed R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnoses that included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed, however R26 was documented with severely impaired cognition, usually understood and able to understand others. During an observation on 1/25/24 at 10:29 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) F prepared R26's medications. RN F removed a blister pack of Citalopram (antidepressant medication), 40 milligram (mg) tablets out of the medication drawer and popped one pill into a plastic 30 cubic centimeter (cc) cup.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent with three observed medication errors out of 26 opportunities. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 11.5 percent and an increased likelihood for medications to be improperly prepared, administered, and/or omitted from residents' medication regimens. Findings include: R26 Review of R26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/23, revealed R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnoses that included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed, however R26 was documented with severely impaired cognition, usually understood and able to understand others. During an observation on 1/25/24 at 10:29 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) F prepared R26's medications. RN F removed a blister pack of Citalopram (antidepressant medication), 40 milligram (mg) tablets out of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for one (Resident #16) of one residents reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the spread of infectious organisms to a vulnerable resident. Findings include: Resident #16 (R16): Review of R16's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 8/24/21 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, acute osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone) of the left ankle and foot and acquired absence of the right leg below the knee (amputation). Review of R16's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition. On 1/22/24 at 11:10 AM, a sign was observed on the door of R16's room titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The signage indicated: Everyone Must: Clean their hands, before entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0895 — isolatedHave a Compliance and Ethics Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MI00142212. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a compliance and ethics program for one (Resident #49) of one residents reviewed for a Facility Reported Incident. This deficient practice resulted in an inaccurate depiction of a facility reported elopement incident to the State Agency (SA). Findings include: Resident #49 (R49): Review of R49's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a most recent admission to the facility on 9/29/23 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease with dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movements), cognitive communication deficit, dementia, difficulty in walking, and history of falling. Record review of R49's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the FRI submitted to the SA included an incident summary which read, in part: .On the morning of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number: MI00138909 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly assess, stage, and implement treatment for newly developed pressure ulcers for two Residents (R1 and R2) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice resulted in delay in treatment and the potential for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: R1 (Resident #1) On 10/9/23 at 1:38 p.m. an interview was conducted with Complainant E who stated that R1 developed a pressure ulcer while staying at the facility. Complainant E stated R1 had discharged from the facility in August 2023. Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 8/8/23 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, right femur fracture, and type 2 diabetes. R1's 8/12/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed he scored an 8/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating he had moderate cognitive impairment. R1 required one staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-09 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the contact information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was posted in a form and manner accessible to residents and resident representatives. This deficient practice affected all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/8/25 at 10:00 AM a confidential group meeting was held with eight residents. During the discussion, the residents stated they were unfamiliar with the Ombudsman and did not know how to contact the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. After the meeting, the public postings were observed. The contact information for the ombudsman was not provided. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 1:30 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated he did not see the ombudsman information posted. A policy for facility posting was requested. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 2:11 PM, the policy again was requested from the Assistant NHA B. There was not a policy for this procedure. .
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-01-09 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reflect the actual hours worked by nursing staff (nurses and certified nursing assistants), this has the potential to affect all 74 residents within the facility. This deficient practice resulted in necessary staffing information not being available to residents and visitors. Findings include: A record review was conducted of the facility's daily staffing positing dated 1/7/25, 1/8/25, 1/9/25 revealed the hours and numbers of the licensed staff, Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and non-licensed staff (CNA (sic) Certified Nursing Assistants) for day and night shifts. The posting indicated it was to be posted 2 hours prior to shift start. There was no indication of actual hours worked on the sheet for the day and night shifts. While conducting an interview on 1/9/25 at approximately 9:33 AM, the DON showed the daily staffing posting, stating that it included all staff present with hours worked in facility. The DON stated they had a nurse that was to cover that morning that did not come in due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$65,403 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $29,627 — penalty dated 2024-06-27
- $20,183 — penalty dated 2024-04-18
- $15,593 — penalty dated 2024-01-29
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-27 for 29 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVEREST OPCO GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2018 |
| B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2018 |
| B&Y TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2018 |
| CODY HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2018 |
| CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2018 |
| NORCROSS, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| ROGERS, STACEY | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| KIRK, KRISTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| FLASHNER, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| BLOSSOM HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2018 |
| PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $465K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235292. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.