Medilodge of Kalamazoo

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 37.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-06-11 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #3005153 and #3005264Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for 1 (Resident #103) of 2 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge, when on 5/4/26 at approximately 11:45 pm, Resident #103 was not allowed back into the building upon her return from an evaluation and subsequent diagnosis of a UTI (urinary tract infection) at a local acute care emergency department. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #103 being without food, shelter, medications, or resources for safety; further resulting in Resident #103 experiencing feelings of fear, anger, and mental anguish. Findings include:Resident #103Review of a Face sheet revealed Resident #103 was a female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure (chronic condition where the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), type 2 diabetes (a metabolic disorder that occurs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide positioning for the prevention of pressure wounds in 1 (R1) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure wounds resulting in the development of a pressure wound. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R1 was unable to complete her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) indicating she was severely cognitively impaired. Her diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (TBI), quadriplegia (paralyzed in all four limbs), and contractures. Section GG-Functional Ability and Goals revealed R1 was dependent for all cares including mobility and positioning. Section M-Skin Conditions revealed R1 was at risk for pressure ulcers/wounds. Observed on 7/7/25 at 2:18 PM, R1 in bed lying on her back. Both legs contracted (pulled up) with knees rubbing/resting together with her heels resting directly on the bed. No wedges or padding underneath her heels, knees, or back to position and off-load her from bony prominences. Two leg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00143151. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from physical abuse from staff to one resident (R105) of six residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in physical abuse, and the potential for continued fear, anxiety, and psychosocial harm. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R105 scored 4/15 (severely cognitively impaired) on her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status). Section E-Behavior indicated the resident did not have hallucinations or delusions as potential indicators of psychosis or behavioral symptoms. R105 did direct verbal behavioral symptoms towards others that significantly interfered with resident's care occurring 1 to 3 days during the last reporting period. Review of R105's Care Plan, revised 10/17/23, indicated the resident had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit related to and including dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #3030592Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to be appropriate for self-administration of medications for 1 (Resident #104) of 1 resident reviewed for medication administration resulting in medications being left unsecured at resident's bedside, residents self-administering medications without staff assessment, and the potential for negative outcomes from taking/instilling too much or too little medications.Findings include:Resident #104Review of a Face sheet revealed Resident #104 was a male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: fracture of right radius (fracture of the right arm) and type 2 diabetes (a metabolic disorder that occurs when the body becomes resistant to insulin or when the pancreas fails to produce enough insulin).In an observation and interview on 6/9/26 at 9:16 am, Resident #104 was observed pushing the buttons and adjusting his insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #3030592Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain professional standards of nursing practice for 1 (Resident #104) of 4 resident reviewed for professional nursing standards resulting in ordered medications not being obtained from a pharmacy, no monitoring of home medication use, medications left unsecured at resident's bedside, and the potential for negative outcomes from taking/instilling too much or too little medications.Findings include:Resident #104Review of a Face sheet revealed Resident #104 was a male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: fracture of right radius (fracture of the right arm) and type 2 diabetes (a metabolic disorder that occurs when the body becomes resistant to insulin or when the pancreas fails to produce enough insulin).In an observation and interview on 6/9/26 at 9:16 am, Resident #104 was observed pushing the buttons and adjusting his insulin pump.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #3030592Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were adequately trained and evaluated for competencies specifically related to the management of an insulin pump for 1 (Resident #104) of 1 reviewed for the management of an insulin pump. This deficient practice had the potential to result in ineffective medication therapy, complications, and adverse reactions. Findings include:Resident #104Review of a Face sheet revealed Resident #104 was a male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: fracture of right radius (fracture of the right arm) and type 2 diabetes (a metabolic disorder that occurs when the body becomes resistant to insulin or when the pancreas fails to produce enough insulin).In an observation and interview on 6/9/26 at 9:16 am, Resident #104 was observed pushing the buttons and adjusting his insulin pump. Resident #104 reported he was protective of his pump.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop policy and procedure to include current standards of practice in regard to pneumococcal (pneumonia) immunizations for 2 (Residents #1 and 10) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations and the potential for eligible residents to not be offered the PCV21 (Pneumococcal 21-valent Conjugate Vaccine), with the potential of increasing the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from pneumonia.Findings include:Review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) policy, Date reviewed/revised: 10/30/2023, stated, It is our (the facility) policy to offer our residents .immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations The type of pneumococcal vaccine (PCV15, PCV20, or PPSV23/PPSV (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine)) . There was no mention of PCV21 in the policy or its existence.Resident #1:Review of Resident #1's immunization report, print date 7/8/25, stated Resident #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake 2590016.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the designated resident representative was notified of changes for 1 (Resident #501) of 3 residents reviewed for notification of changes resulting in a resident representative being unaware of x-ray results and falls, a resident representative experienced the feeling of uncertainty of how their family member was being cared for at the facility, and the potential for resident representatives to be unable to make timely care decisions. Findings include:Review of Resident #501's admission record, print date 8/20/25, revealed Resident #501 had diagnoses of senile (exhibiting a decline of cognitive abilities) degeneration of brain, dementia (decline in cognitive function), unspecified psychosis (trouble telling the difference between what's real and what's not), cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, anxiety, disorientation, and falls. Resident Representative M was listed first under Resident #501's Contacts indicating he was Resident #501's Responsible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to support meaningful involvement in activities of choice, for 1 (Resident #14) of 12 residents reviewed for meaningful activities resulting in the potential for feelings of boredom, loneliness, and unmet psychosocial needs. Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #14 was a female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14, with a reference date of 6/2/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment should not be conducted due to Resident #14 is rarely/never understood and Resident #14 has memory problems, Resident #14 cognitive skills for daily decision making are 3. Severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ambulation device to prevent falls and fall with injury in 1 (R31) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents resulting in injury and the potential of further falls with injury.Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R31 scored 5/15 on her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) indicating she was cognitively impaired. Diagnoses included dementia. Section GG-Functional Abilities and Goals indicated supervision was required for walking from 10 to 150 feet. Review of R31's Incident Report dated 2/22/25 at 11:10 PM indicated the resident had a witnessed fall when her feet got tangled together causing her to hit her head on the floor. Upon assessment the resident was found to have an abrasion to her left forehead. The IDT (interdisciplinary team) met with new interventions including therapy to initiate a walker for safety. Review of R31's Care Plan, ADLS or Falls, print date 7/7/25 did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1.) maintain proper infection control practices while utilizing resident shared equipment (a glucometer- a machine that uses a drop of blood to analyze the level of glucose (sugar) in a person's blood stream) during medication administration for 1 (Resident #88) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration and 2.) ensure appropriate use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1 (R1) reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection, cross contamination and disease transmission. Findings include:Resident #88Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #88 was a male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: Type 2 diabetes mellitus with complications (a condition when the body is unable to produce or use insulin correctly resulting in high blood sugar). Review of Order Summary for Resident #88 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains in intake MI00152648 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with toileting for 1 (Resident #103) of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care resulting in the potential for avoidable negative physical outcomes for resident's who are dependent on staff for assistance. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #103 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included difficulty in walking and pain in left foot. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #103, with a reference date of 3/26/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8/15 which indicated Resident #103 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #103's [NAME] (Care area report for staff to reference to determine what kind of care residents need) revealed, ADL'S: TOILETING: 2 person assist. TRANSFERS: 2 person assist with sit-to-stand . Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an initial kitchen tour on 7/30/24 at 8:43am, the reach in refrigerator contained the following expired food items: a container of sour cream with a use by date of 7/24/24, 2 ham sandwiches in plastic bags with use by date of 7/28/24, and 3, 8 count packages of hamburger buns with use by date of 7/24/24. 1 package of hot dog buns dated 6/14/24 was present with no use by date, upon examination, the hot dog buns were hard to the touch. During the initial kitchen tour on 7/30/24 at 8:47am, the reach in freezer in the main kitchen area contained a 3-gallon container of vanilla ice cream that had a torn and damaged cardboard lid placed on top of the opening. The lid had a torn opening across it and did not seal the container, which resulted in an opportunity for the food inside to become contaminated. During the initial kitchen tour on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-12 for 9 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $247K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI