No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Medilodge of Capital Area

2100 E Provincial House Drive, Lansing, MI 48910 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (517) 272-4029 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 immediate-jeopardy citations$22,710 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,710 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-30)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2815 S Pennsylvania Ave · (517) 372-0300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5212 Aurelius Rd · (517) 882-4312 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
R&K Store0.3 mi
4013 Aurelius Rd · (517) 882-3651 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.7%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.0%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.4%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.3%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.0%79.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.5%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.6%11.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.451.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.931.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.8%CMS range 37.3–68.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.5–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.84
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
58.1%
Total nursing turnover
31.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-06)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00148941, MI00148966 and MI00149186 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's (R505) right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident (R501) of 7 sampled residents reviewed for abuse resulting in sexual assault of R505 who was cognitively impaired and also resulted in the likelihood of physical harm, infection, and emotional pain and suffering, based on the reasonable person concept. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 12/18/2024 at 10:10 AM. and confirmed viewing the facility surveillance video captured on 12/12/24. The video taken on 12/12/24 at 7:42 PM showed R501 ushered R505 into R501's room. At 9:09 PM, R501 was seen on video looking up the hallway before ushering R505 back to her room. On 12/13/2024, R505 was sent to the emergency room for further examination due to soiled underwear and suspected sexual assault. The DON stated the video was no longer available for review. The facility did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent accidents, failed to adequately investigate accidents, determine root cause of accident for one resident (#75) resulting in death and to prevent potential accidents with harm in six residents (#22, #26, #29, #36, #46, #84) of seven residents reviewed, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy when resident #75 was using an unassessed electric scooter, fell, suffered a left hip fracture, and died related to complication of the fall and failed to prevent the potential of serious harm to other residents that are using electric wheelchairs and scooters in a current facility census of 83. Findings Include: Resident #75 (R75) Review of the medical record revealed R75 was admitted to the facility originally admitted to the facility [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerosis of arteries of right leg, social phobia, gastroesophageal reflux, hyperparathyroidism of renal origin, acquired absence of left below the knee, anxiety, insomnia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: 2969859, 2990774, 2999197, 2999242 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect and prevent abuse in four residents (R12, R34, R95, R101) of four residents reviewed for abuse and six residents (R12, R34, R61, R68, R95, R101) of six residents reported from facility reported incidents. Findings Include: Resident #12 (R12): Per the facility's face sheet R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included depression and anxiety. Review of a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score dated 5/5/2026 revealed R12 scored a 15 out of 15 which indicated full mental cognition. Review of a facility reported incident (FRI), dated 4/11/2026, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) II was witnessed by LPN JJ, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) KK, CNA LL stating to R12 that she was going to mark all her medications as refused after having an argument with her about the medications she was receiving. The FRI revealed that LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for three residents (R34, R68, R107) of six reviewed.Findings include: Resident # 107 (R107) A review of the clinical record revealed R107 was admitted into the facility on 9/26/25 with diagnoses that included: Bipolar disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct and depression. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R107 scored 6/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated severely impaired cognition). On 6/23/26 at 1:02 PM, R107 was observed sitting on his bed in his room. R107 reported that he kissed a staff member and that staff member kissed him back. He identified the staff member as CNA (certified nursing assistant) P and reported that facility staff are aware. R107 reported being fond of CNA P. A review of R107's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately investigate an allegation of neglect/abuse for two resident (#34, #107) of six residents reviewed for neglect/abuse.Findings Included: R107A review of the clinical record revealed R107 was admitted into the facility on 9/26/25 with diagnoses that included: Bipolar disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct and depression. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R107 scored 6/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated severely impaired cognition). On 6/23/26 at 1:02 PM, R107 was observed sitting on his bed in his room. R107 reported that he kissed a staff member and that staff member kissed him back. He identified the staff member as CNA (certified nursing assistant) P and reported that facility staff are aware. R107 reported being fond of CNA P. A review of R107's Progress notes revealed the following: 6/24/26 1:51 pm Behavior Displayed: Per CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2788552.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician documented that transfer/discharge was necessary for one (R1) of three reviewed.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of left leg, epilepsy, anxiety disorder, depression, schizophrenia, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/30/26 revealed R1 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). In a telephone interview on 3/4/26 at 9:58 AM, R1 reported approximately four police officers, and a social worker came into his room with an order from the judge to send him to the hospital for evaluation. R1 reported that same night, he was ready to discharge from the hospital back to the facility. R1 reported the hospital called the facility, but the facility refused to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2747733.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a vendor for one (R3) of three reviewed.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and history of traumatic brain injury. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/26/26 revealed R3 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R3 discharged from the facility on 2/19/26.Review of the incident investigation that the facility reported to the State Agency revealed Background: [R3] was admitted on [DATE]. On 2/8/26, the physician ordered an x-ray for [R3]. [Xray Technician (XT) E] .came into the facility. XT E entered [R3's] room. [XT E] stood over top of [R3] and began swearing at him while shaking a closed fist. Investigation: [R3], Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency for four residents (#1,#6,#9,#10) of ten residents reviewed for abuse. This citation pertains to intake #2615129 Review of the medical record reflected R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included alcohol dependance and anxiety disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/29/25, reflected R1 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). In an interview on 9/23/25 at 9:30 AM, Family Member (FM) D reported concerns that R1's debit card was removed from the facility by staff and used to purchase items. Additionally, the staff member had withdrew cash from the bank and kept some for themselves. The staff member was identified as CNA E. In an interview on 9/23/25 at 1:56 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H confirmed that R1 will regularly ask staff to take her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse for three residents (#6,#9,#10) out of ten residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Included: Resident #6 (R6)Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility 08/07/2025 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, anemia (low red blood cells, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), gastro-esophageal reflux, dementia and depression. The most recent Minimum Data set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/2025, revealed R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. Resident #9 (R9)Review of the medical record revealed R9 was admitted to the facility 07/11/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia, epilepsy (disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures), stage 3 kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), traumatic brain injury, gastro-esophageal reflux, hypertension, cognitive communication deficient,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement its own written policies and procedures for Abuse and Neglect for four residents (#6, #9, #10) of 10 residents reviewed. Findings Included:Resident #6 (R6):Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility 08/07/2025 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, anemia (low red blood cells, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), gastro-esophageal reflux, dementia and depression. The most recent Minimum Data set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/2025, revealed R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. Resident #9 (R9):Review of the medical record revealed R9 was admitted to the facility 07/11/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia, epilepsy (disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures), stage 3 kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), traumatic brain injury, gastro-esophageal reflux, hypertension, cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order an advanced directive/ Do Not Resuscitate, for one resident (resident #8) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8 scored 9 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Further record review revealed R8 had a full legal guardian in place to make health and medical care decisions. R8's advanced directives revealed the legal guardian signed an advanced directive form on [DATE] that reflected Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) / No CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation which is an emergency procedure that combines chest compressions and rescue breathing to restart a person's breathing and heartbeat. The form included 2 witnesses, and the Physician signature dated [DATE]. During a record review on [DATE] it was revealed there was no Physician order in place to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a change in condition, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for two (Resident #6 and Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/27/25, reflected R6 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the MDS indictors revealed that R6 was coded as having a tracheostomy. On 08/04/2025 at 12:19 PM, R6 was observed in her room watching television. No tracheostomy equipment was observed at the bedside, no tracheostomy was observed on R6. R6 denied having a tracheostomy. Review of R6's Five-day MDS revealed under Section O- Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, R6 required Tracheostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to update/revise individualized, person-centered care plans to reflect the changing care needs for 1 resident (R5) of 23 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #5: Observation on 8/4/2025 during the initial screen process of the healthcare survey revealed Resident #5 to be located in the 300-unit hall resting in bed. Resident #5 had a perimeter mattress and bilateral fall mats placed at bedside. Resident #5 was able to make eye contact, although could not respond appropriately to surveyor questions. Record review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed an elderly resident with severe impaired cognitive ability of a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMs) score of 1 out of 15. Medical diagnosis included dementia, anxiety and depression. Record review of Resident #5's care plans pages 1-42 noted on page 36 a care plan of: Resident resides on secure care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living skills were maintained for one of five residents reviewed (Resident #74). Findings include:Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R74 scored 12 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Review of R74's care plan dated 6/24/25 revealed he required one person assist for hygiene, there was no documentation in R74's clinical record that reflected refused or was resistant to care. On 08/04/2025 at 11:14 AM, during the initial screening process Resident #74 was observed in dining/former therapy room, hair was observed greasy and not combed, mustache was very long and went into his mouth. R74 was observed wearing blue jogging pants with food and debris on them. On 08/05/2025 9:17 AM observed sitting at side of bed, wearing same soiled blue jogging pants as they day prior, R74's hair was observed messy and greasy, the same observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of facility-acquired pressure ulcer injuries for one resident (R5) of three residents reviewed, resulting in facility-acquired (in-house) development of pressure ulcer/injuries, pain, discomfort, and likelihood for prolonged illness or hospitalization. Findings include: Resident #5:Record review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed an elderly resident with severe impaired cognitive ability of a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMs) score of 1 out of 15. Medical diagnosis included dementia, anxiety and depression. Section M: Skin noted a stage II pressure ulcer upon re-entry to the facility.Observation on 08/05/2025 at 9:19 AM of Resident #5 was lying in bed on her back. Resident was noted to have a small green positioning wedge device pushed off the bed and on the floor. Record review of Resident #5's 'Skin/Wound' assessments revealed on 5/16/2025 a Right Gluteal 100% epithelial measuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00151282 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve food at the preferred temperature for two resident (#2, #4) of three resident reviewed for food palpability resulting in dissatisfaction during meals. Findings Included: Resident #2 (R2): Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility 12/13/2024 with diagnoses that included kidney failure, acute cystitis (inflammation of the bladder), dissection of thoracic aorta, chronic ischemic heart disease, hyperkalemia (high potassium level), muscle weakness, anemia (low red blood count), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), mood disorder, depression, and myalgia (muscle pain). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/21/2025, revealed R2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During observation and interview on 04/08/2025 at 08:20 a.m. R2 was observed walking from his bathroom back to his bed. R2 explained that he has not had a hot meal since he was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00151282 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food preferences for one Residents (#2) of three sampled Residents resulting in frustration and an unpleasant dining experience. Findings Included: Resident #2 (R2): Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility 12/13/2024 with diagnoses that included kidney failure, acute cystitis (inflammation of the bladder), dissection of thoracic aorta, chronic ischemic heart disease, hyperkalemia (high potassium level), muscle weakness, anemia (low red blood count), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), mood disorder, depression, and myalgia (muscle pain). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/21/2025, revealed R2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During observation and interview on 04/08/2025 at 08:20 a.m. R2 was observed walking from his bathroom back to his bed. R2 explained that he had issues with getting the food items that were listed on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00150230 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Physician's Orders for medications for one Residents (Resident #10) of 4 reviewed for physician orders. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type two diabetes and cirrhosis of the liver. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/14/25, reflected R10 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R10 no longer resided in the facility. Review of the physician orders revealed an order initiated on 1/26/25 for Lactulose oral solution 10 grams (GM)/15 milliliters (ML) to be administers three times a day. Review of the Physician orders revealed an order initiated on 1/24/25 for Glimepiride Oral tablet 2 milligrams (mg) to be administered one time a day and an order for Isosorbide Dinitrate oral tablet 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertain to intake: MI00149478, MI00149576, and MI00149772 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow acceptable professional guidelines, by using PDI Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes while performing incontinent bowel care for one resident (#101) out of three residents reviewed. Findings Included: Resident #101 (R101) Review of the medical record reviewed R101 was admitted to the facility 07/17/2020 with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, hypertension, speech and language deficits, Parkinson's disease, gastro-esophageal reflux, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle spasm, and dysarthria (slurred speech). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/02/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (moderate cognitive impairment) out of 15. During an interview on 02/10/2025 at 02:44 p.m. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D explained that on 01/06/2025 at 11:30 a.m. she had requested Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) I to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain plumbing and refrigeration equipment, resulting in the potential for an increased risk of foodborne illness, affecting all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 6/25/24 at 9:58 AM, water was observed to be leaking from the in-line water filter provided for the coffee maker. At this time, water accumulation was observed on the floor. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 5-205.15 System Maintained in Good Repair. A PLUMBING SYSTEM shall be: (A) Repaired according to LAW; P and (B) Maintained in good repair. On 6/25/24 at 10:19 AM, the Arctic Air reach-in cooler was observed to be holding temperature at around 52 degrees Fahrenheit, read from the internal ambient air thermometer. At this time, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) G stated that staff were just in the cooler and that the temperature hasn't dropped down yet since the door was open. Peanut butter jelly sandwiches, individually portioned salads, and meat and cheese sandwiches were observed in the cooler. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to control pests in the kitchen and reduce harborage conditions, resulting in uncontrolled pests in the facility, affecting all residents in current facility census of 99 residents. Findings include: On 6/25/24 at 10:03 AM, a swarm of gnats were observed in the dry storage room, surrounding the bread rack, which is located directly next to a drainage pipe. At this time, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) G stated that the pest control operator has provided them with floor and drain cleaner which is supposed to help with the gnats. On 6/25/24 at 10:15 AM, a swarm of gnats were observed flying around the grease trap by the three-compartment sink. On 6/25/24 at 11:35 AM, gnats were observed to be flying around the dish machine area. On 6/25/24 at 11:44 AM, a cart in the dining room was observed to be holding breakfast trays, while residents were in the dining room waiting for their lunch trays. The breakfast trays were observed to be attracting gnats, with multiple gnats observed on the leftover breakfast foods. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Activities Director had minimum qualifications to perform the duties of the position effectively involving residents on the memory care unit with a current census of 20 residents. Findings include: On 06/25/24 at 10:03 AM during the initial tour of the facility's memory care unit, (census of 20) several residents were observed in bed. Nine residents were observed sitting in lounge/ TV area 7 of 9 residents were sleeping. No observed activity throughout the unit was in progress. On 06/26/24 at 12:48PM Eight residents were observed in day area, TV was on but residents were looking around and nodding off. On 06/27/24 at 09:09 AM, the day room area had the TV was on, 9 residents were present 4 were asleep and the other 5 residents were looking around the room. At 9:33 4 of the 6 residents continued to sleep the television was still on and none of the residents were watching it. The memory care Activity Calendar for 6/27/24 reflected a scheduled activity titled Coffee and Cocoa at 10:30 at 10:35am…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve food at the preferred temperature for one resident (#57) and six residents (confidential resident group) and failed to provide condiments, food accuracy, preferred food palatability, preferred eating utensils, and preferred food items for six residents (confidential resident group) resulting in dissatisfaction during meals. Findings Included: Resident #57 (R57) Review of the medical record demonstrated that R57 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, neoplasm (abnormal mass) related pain, malignant (cancer) neoplasm of the cervix, malignant neoplasm of bone, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CPOD), cognitive communication deficit, insomnia, mood disorder, depression, and back pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/30/2024, revealed R57 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately report an injury of unknown origin for one out of six residents (Resident #25), resulting in the potential for further injuries of unknown origin to not be reported, and facility corrective action to not be taken. Findings Included: Per the facility face sheet R25 had been a resident at the facility since 11/16/2023 with a recent readmission on [DATE]. Review of an incident report dated 6/20/2024, revealed R25 was noted to have a small bruise that measured 0.5 inches by 0.5 inches on her forehead at her hairline. The report revealed R25 preferred to rest her head on the wall when standing in the bathroom while being changed. It was documented on the report, resident often leans forward and places head on wall. The report also revealed R25 was not able to give a description or stated what had happened that caused the bruising. The incident report did not describe the color of the bruise or the stage of healing the bruise was in.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted for one out of six residents (R25) sampled for alleged abuse resulting in the potential for abuse to occur, and necessary actions to not take place for resident protection. Findings Included: Per the facility face sheet R25 had been a resident at the facility since 11/16/2023 with a recent readmission on [DATE]. Review of an incident report dated 6/20/2024, revealed R25 was noted to have a small bruise that measured 0.5 inches by 0.5 inches on her forehead at her hairline. The report revealed R25 preferred to rest her head on the wall when standing in the bathroom while being changed. It was documented on the report, resident often leans forward and places head on wall. The report also revealed R25 was not able to give a description or stated what had happened that caused the bruising. The incident report did not describe the color of the bruise or the stage of healing the bruise was in.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately complete a comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #254) of twenty residents reviewed resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Finding Included: Resident #254 (R254) Review of the medical record demonstrated R254 was admitted to the facility 06/10/2024 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Epilepsy (disorder of the brain characterized by repeated seizures), schizoaffective disorder, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, insomnia, dementia, hypertension, depression, anemia (low red blood cells), orthostatic hypotension, and stroke. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/16/2024, revealed R254 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (moderate cognitive impairment) out of 15. Section M (skin conditions) of the MDS, with the same ARD, demonstrated that R254 did not have a pressure ulcer. During observation and interview on 06/25/2024 at 01:14 p.m. R254 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement resident care plans in two of 20 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the likelihood for the development of pressure ulcers and injuries (Resident #34) and a delay in dental care (Resident #36). Findings Include: Resident #34 (R34): R34's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with assessment reference date of 3/22/24 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and her cognitive skills for daily decision making was severely impaired (never/rarely made decisions). The same MDS assessment revealed R34 was dependent in activities of daily living (ADL) care and, at the time of the assessment, had a facility acquired Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full tissue thickness loss; subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle was not exposed; slough [devitalized tissue] may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss; may include undermining [erosion under wound edges] and tunneling [passageways…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a meaningful, diverse, and engaging activity program for one resident (#44) of one resident reviewed for activities. Findings include: Resident #44 (R44) Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident # 44 (R44) was a admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and resided on the facility's secured memory care unit. R44 scored 00 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of R44's activity assessment dated [DATE] reflected R44 enjoys music, talk radio, walking and pet visits. The assessment reflected R44 had severe cognitive impairment and will make sounds but not normally words. Section 2 of the same assessments reflected materials would be provided as needed or requested. Section 4 of the assessment reflected R44 was cheerful, anxious/depressed and a passive observer. Review of R44's activity care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer Resident #34 with a mechanical lift, in one of four residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in a hematoma and bruises. Findings Include: Resident #34 (R34) On 6/27/24 at 8:35 AM R34 was observed lying in bed with her legs crossed at her knees. R34 had a raised bruise on the right side of her forehead. Resident Aide (RA) J and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) I provided morning activities of daily living (ADL) care. Staff Development Registered Nurse (SDRN) C entered R34's room to perform a competency check-off for the mechanical lift transfer while surveyor was observing care. RA J placed a transfer sling with green binding under R34. RA J was guided by CNA I on how to don the sling and attach the sling to the mechanical lift transfer device (Maxi Lift). R34 was lifted from her bed in the sling without her head supported and her lower trunk was not fully supported in the sling. RA I and CNA J lowered R34 back to her bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to ensure their medication error rate was below 5% when three medication errors were observed from a total of 27 opportunities for one resident (Resident #81) of seven reviewed resulting in a medication error rate of 11.11%. Findings include: On 06/26/24 at 9:05 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K was observed preparing and administering medications to R81. LPN K administered Metoprolol (used to treat hypertension/high blood pressure) 25 milligrams (mg) , two Senna Plus (senna 8.6 mg (laxative) with docusate sodium 50 mg (stool softener)) , and 25 milliliters (mL) of ClearLax (Miralax/laxative). LPN K measured the ClearLax in a plastic pill cup. When asked how much was being administered, LPN K reported 25 milliliters (mL). R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included thoracic spine injuries. Review of R81's Physician's Order dated 6/6/24 revealed R81 was ordered to receive Metoprolol 25 mg half tablet (12.5 mg) twice a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly schedule a dental referral, in one of one resident reviewed for dental care (Resident #36), resulting in continued pain and a delay meeting resident goals. Findings include: Resident #36 (R36) R36 was observed sitting in his bed on 6/26/24 at 8:27 AM and stated he had sores in his mouth, like blisters, that caused him pain. R36 complained that he was supposed to see another dentist but was not aware if an appointment had been scheduled. R36's MDS with ARD dated of 3/07/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, cognitive screener) score of 10 (08-12 Moderate Impairment). In review of R36's care plans on 6/26/24, there was no care plans regarding dental issues or oral care. R36's Dental visit notes dated 3/28/24 revealed R36 had the diagnoses of dementia, obstructive sleep apnea, and lung disease. R36 had generalized soreness in his mouth, including burning sensations.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment for one resident (#30) out of twenty residents, resulting the potential for decrease independence with preparing meals and eating. Findings Included: Resident #30 (R30) Review of the medical record demonstrated R30 was admitted to the facility 04/30/2024 with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone caused by infection) of left ankle an foot, type 2 diabetes, arthritis, myocardial infarction (hear attack), heart disease, uropathy (disease affecting urinary flow), absence right leg below knee, urinary retention, cognitive communication deficit, depression, atherosclerosis (build-up of fats, cholesterol in and on the artery walls), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), hypertension, hyperlipemia (high fat content in blood), insomnia, and stroke. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/05/2024, revealed R30 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper communication/documentation of Hospice services provided to one resident's responsible person (Resident #56) of one resident reviewed for Hospice services, resulting in a lack of coordination of comprehensive services and care provided. Findings Included: Resident #56 (R56) Review of the medical record demonstrated R56 was admitted to the facility 02/15/2024 with diagnoses that included dementia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed), type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis (type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down), atrial fibrillation, urine retention, gastro-esophageal reflux, Alzheimer's Disease, depression, hyperlipidemia (high fat content blood), and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/26/2024, revealed R56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00 (sever cognitive impairment) out 15. The same MDS demonstrated section O-Special, Treatments, Procedures, and Programs demonstrated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer pneumococcal immunizations in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for one resident (#25) of five residents reviewed resulting in the potential for server illness and complications from pneumococcal disease Findings Included: Resident #25 (R25) Review of the medical record demonstrated that R25 was admitted to the facility 11/18/2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), sever protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertension, depression, muscle weakness, insomnia, irritable bowel syndrome, and spinal stenosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/25/2024, revealed R25 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 2 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. Review of R25's medical record demonstrated a date of birth of [DATE]. R25's medical record demonstrated that she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to honor residents rights for one resident #4 (R4) of one resident reviewed for resident rights resulting in increased anxiety, PTSD symptoms, decreased self-worth and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings Include; Resident #4 (R4) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #04 (R04) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, pressure ulcer of sacral region, malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue, major depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, acquired absence of left hip joint, absence of left leg, segmental and somatic dysfunction of upper extremity and polyneuropathy. According to Resident #04 (R04)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R04 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R04 requires 2 persons…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake: MI00142444 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain a timely urinary analysis for one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for timely laboratory services. Findings Included: Resident #7 (R7) Review of the medical record revealed R7 was admitted to the facility 05/24/2023 with diagnoses that included sepsis, bacterial infections, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pressure ulcer sacral region, malignant neoplasm (cancer) of connective and soft tissue, depression, anxiety, adjustment disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), hypertension, and urinary tract infection. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/20/2023, demonstrated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. R7's MDS, with the same ARD, section H-Bowel and Bladder, demonstrated that she has an indwelling urinary catheter. During observation and interview on 02/13/2024 at 11:47 a.m. R7 was observed lying down in bed. Observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately record grievances for one resident (#1) out of three residents resulting in the potential for unresolved resident grievances. Findings Included: Resident #1 (R1) Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility 06/28/2023 with diagnoses that included infection following a surgical procedure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, ankylosis (abnormal stiffening and immobility of joints), right tibial (leg bone) tendinitis, adjustment disorder, anxiety, overactive bladder, chronic kidney disease, edema (swelling), ankle contracture (tissue tightening causing deformity), left tibial tendinitis, carpal tunnel syndrome of the left upper limb, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/03/2023, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIM) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Section M-Skin Conditions of the MDS, with the same ARD, revealed that R1 had a surgical wound. R1 was discharged from the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to remove/discard expired ready-to-eat food products, effecting 81 residents that consume meals from the facility kitchen, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and resident foodborne illness. Findings include: On 04/24/23 at 08:40 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with facility cook S the first cooler container d a bag of sliced ham, the bag was opened and not dated, an open container of not labeled or dated contained 5 loose hot dogs, and a large zip lock bag was observed to have 8 sandwich size bags that contained 1/2 peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, none of the bags were labeled or dated. The second cooler contained a container of sliced cheese with a use by date of 4/23. There were 2 pitchers of liquid, one yellow one pinkish red, neither were labeled or dated. The freezer was observed to have a clear bag of meatballs 2.5 pounds was printed on the bag, but the bag was not labeled or dated. 5 packages of frozen waffles Freezer #5 in the row- 5 separate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to; 1) maintain the physical plant and, 2) provide infection surveillance for 83 residents, resulting in the potential spread of harmful microorganisms and placing staff and other residents at potential risk of infection. Findings Included: During a tour of the facility laundry facility on 04/26/2023 at 08:46 a.m., with the Manager of Laundry and House Keeping O, it was observed that the two washing units were in the soiled section of the laundry room. Several containers of laundry solution was observed to be stored between one washing machine and a wall. Behind the containers it was observed that gypsum board had been removed from the wall and aluminum studs could be viewed. The gypsum board on the opposite side of the aluminum studs could be seen. A film of dark black substance and rust was visible on the aluminum studs. A film of dark black substance could be seen on the gypsum board on the other side of aluminum studs. A film of dark black substance could also be seen on the floor. The opening of the gypsum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant affecting 83 residents resulting in unsanitary conditions and the potential harborage of micro-organisms and the potential of decreased air quality. Findings Included: During a tour of the facility laundry facility on 04/26/2023 at 08:46 a.m., with the Manager of Laundry and House Keeping O, it was observed that the two washing units were in the soiled section of the laundry room. Behind the two washers, in an area approximately 6 feet by 12 feet, it was observed that the area contained old PVC (synthetic resin) pipe under the current washer drain. It was also observed that the floor was soiled and appeared to be un-uncleaned. A heating register was also observed to have a significant amount of what appeared to be rust on the register guard. An exhaust fan, which exited the building, was also observed to a significant amount of lint on the fan blades and around the inner guard of the unit. In an interview on 04/26/2023 at 08:46 a.m. with the Manager of Laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that grievances were promptly investigated, and resolved for five of five Residents( resident #'s 15, 18, 33, 55 and 84) reviewed for grievances, resulting in anger and frustration. Findings include: Resident 55(R55) According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] , Resident # 55 (R55) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, anxiety. R55 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 04/24/23 at 10:17 AM, during a bedside interview with R55 it was reported every time Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN ) C was on duty misses dose of scheduled pain medication and medications with a physician ordered administration time of 8:00 am was frequently not administered until 11:00 am or later if LPN C was the assigned nurse. R55 stated the complaints have been verbalized on multiple occasions to management staff and have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to (1. ensure multi-dose insulin pens were dated upon opening in 1 of 3 medication carts; (2. label open multi-dose prescription eye drop with open date and resident name in 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for labeling, dating and expiration of medications; (3. dispose of expired medications and/or medical supplies in 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed; and 4.) maintain secure treatment cart. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for administration of expired medications and decreased therapeutic effects of administered medications, the potential for cross contamination, and medication errors in a current facility census of 83. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 4/24/23 at 1:09 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C opened the 500B medication cart. One opened bottle of Folic Acid 400 mg with manufacturer expiration(manf. exp) date of 7/22, one open bottle of Vitamin D3 50000iu with manufacture expiration date 9/22 and one opened bottle of Allergy Relief Cetrizine Hyero 10mg with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of 2 out of 18 residents (R72 and R16) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, out of a total sample of 18, resulting in the potential for inaccurate assessment information, and resident care needs not being met. Findings included: Resident 72 (R72) Review of the medical record reflected R72 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, Chronic Viral Hepatitis C, unspecified mood disorder, symptoms of and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, cognitive communication deficit and anxiety. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/09/2023, revealed R72 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 00 (severely impaired) out of 15. Under section G0110, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R72 requires extensive assistance with care provided,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise care plans for 1 resident (resident #16) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the potential for mismanaged care and unmet nutritional goals for resident 16. Findings include: According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident # 16 (R16) was [AGE] year old and had resided at the facility for one year with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity and hypertension. R16 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of Registered Dietician (RD) E progress notes dated 2/20 and 2/21/23 reflected R16 weighed 378 pounds and verbalized to RD E that R16 had desired to lose weight. Review of R16's nutritional care plan dated 4/04/22 with a revision date of 3/13/23, did not identify morbid obesity as a problem, was not updated include a goal for weight loss or approaches on how the facility would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meaningful, individualized activities to 1 resident (R13) of 18 reviewed for activities, from a total sample of 18 residents, resulting in the potential for loneliness, boredom and feelings of lack of self-worth. Findings include: Resident 13 (R13) Review of the medical record reflected R13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then admitted to hospice on 10/12/21. Diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, major depression and anxiety. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/20/2023, revealed R13 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 (severe impairment) out of 15. Under section G0110, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R13 requires extensive assistance to dependent with all care provided. Observation of activities listed on the white board for 04/25/23 revealed 10:30 Am coffee and cocoa, 1:30 pm movie,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) follow Physician's Orders for medications for two Residents (R15 and R55) of 18 reviewed for physician orders; 2) ensure appropriate monitoring of blood glucose (sugar) levels for one Resident (R15) of one reviewed for assessment and monitoring; and 3) ensure insulin was administered according to Physician's Orders for one Resident (R15) reviewed for medications, resulting in medications not being administered according to Physician's Orders and/or manufacturer instructions, and lack of appropriate monitoring and management of diabetes. Findings include: Resident #15(R15) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R15 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), renal failure, diabetes with use of insulin, falls, depression and anxiety. The MDS reflected R15 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 14 which indicated her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two out of three residents (Resident #16 and 77) maintained an acceptable nutritional status and identifying potential causes for weight loss and gain resulting in the potential for further weight loss and/or gain. Findings Included: Resident #77 (R77): Per R77's electronic medical record (EMR) R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included open wounds to lower back, pelvis, left foot, and gangrene. In an interview on 4/24/2023 at 12:11 PM, R77 stated he had lost 40lbs (pounds) since he was admitted to the facility. During the interview with R77 a staff member entered his room to pick up his lunch tray. The staff member asked R77 if he was going to eat, and R77 said no he was not hungry. R77's food tray was observed during the interview which revealed R77 did not take one bite of his food. Review of R77's documented weights revealed that upon his admission on [DATE], R77 weighed 220 lbs., and on 04/13/2023, R77…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician was made aware and involved in significant weight losses and gains for one resident (R16) of 3 residents reviewed for nutritional status. This deficient practice resulted into R16's significant weight gains and losses going unevaluated and treated by the physician. Findings include: Resident #16 (R16) According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident # 16 (R16) was [AGE] year old and had resided at the facility for one year with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity and hypertension. R16 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Further review of the clinical record reflected section K of the MDS dated [DATE] was coded for significant weight loss (5% loss in one month or 10% loss in 6 months). Review of R16's medical record reflected, on 12/09/2022, the R16 weighed 346.8 pounds. On 01/05/2023, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed and acted upon identified medication regimen irregularities for one (Resident #16) of seven reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and adverse reactions. Findings include: According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident # 16 (R16) was [AGE] year old and had resided at the facility for one year with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity and hypertension. R 16 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Further review of the clinical record reflected the pharmacy reviewed R16's medication regimen and documented their recommendations the progress note in the electronic record reflected (see recommendation) further review of the clinical did not have the recommendations/ pharmacy report scanned in for the following dates: 6/14/22, 8/09/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent when 13 medication errors were observed from a total of 27 opportunities for two resident (R8 and R18) of seven residents observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 48.15%. Findings include: During medication pass task observation, interview and record review on 4/25/23 at 1:51 PM, Unit Manager X reported was not the nurse assigned to the 200 hall medication cart but was asked by management a few minutes prior to assist Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F. UM X reported LPN F was nurse on 200 hall and half of 300 hall today from 6:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and was currently working on 300 hall and had no knowledge of any emergencies that day that would have delayed scheduled medication pass. UM X unlocked the 200 hall medication cart and prepared 13 medication two supplements for R8 that included: -allopurinal 100mg one tablet -vitamin c 500mg 2 tablets -aspirin 81mg 1 tablet -bumex 1mg 2 tablets -vitamin D 1000iu 1 tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor medication administration to ensure medications were administered timely and according to professional standards of practice in 2 of 18 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #2 & #244), resulting in the potential to cause resident discomfort (Resident #2) and the potential to jeopardize health (Resident #2 & #244). Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) R2 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the activity room [ROOM NUMBER]/25/23 at 12:21 PM. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home (NH) residents, score of 15 (13-15 Cognitively Intact), required extensive assistance for personal hygiene, and was admitted with a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss), high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis (causes nerve dysfunction), and pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide influenza vaccinations to two residents (#77, #84) out of five residents reviewed for influenza vaccination resulting in the exposure of serious illness to the residents. Findings Included: Resident #77 (R77) Review of the medical record revealed R77 was admitted to the facility 01/13/2023 with diagnoses that included Fournier gangrene (bacterial infection of scrotum, penis, or perineum), type 2 diabetes, wound to left foot, gout (increase of uric acid in bone joints), wound to lower back, congestive heart disease (CHF), lymphedema (swelling of body caused by abnormal accumulation of lymph), dementia, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/19/2023, revealed R77 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (intact cognition) out of 15. During observation and interview on 04/26/2023 at 08:32 a.m. R77 was observed lying in bed. R77 explained that he had not received the influenza vaccination at the facility but that he was interested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-01 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Covid-19 vaccinations to two residents (#15, #84) out of five residents reviewed for Covid-19 vaccination resulting in the exposure of serious illness to the residents. Findings Included: Resident #15 (R15) Review of the medical record revealed R15 was admitted to the facility 03/14/2023 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in the blood), anxiety, and depression. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/20/2023, revealed R15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (intact cognition) out of 15. During observation and interview on 04/26/2023 at 08:35 a.m. R15 was observed sitting on the side of her bed. She explained that she was not offered a Covid-19 immunization when she was admitted to the facility. R15 explained that she was interested in the Covid-19 immunization and had been offered it yesterday. She also explained that a nurse had told her that she was going to get the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,710 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $22,710 — penalty dated 2024-12-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Medilodge of FarmingtonFarmington, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand BlancGrand Blanc, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of HowellHowell, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MarshallMarshall, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Montrose IncMontrose, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of MunisingMunising, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of Sault Ste. MarieSault Ste. Marie, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of SouthfieldSouthfield, MI 1 of 5Medilodge of WestwoodKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge at the ShoreGrand Haven, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of CheboyganCheboygan, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of East LansingEast Lansing, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of FrankenmuthFrankenmuth, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of GTCTraverse City, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of KalamazooKalamazoo, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of LudingtonLudington, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of St. ClairEast China, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of Sterling HeightsSterling Heights, MI 2 of 5Medilodge of West BloomfieldWest Bloomfield, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Campus AreaEast Lansing, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of HillmanHillman, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivingstonHowell, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of LivoniaLivonia, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Mt. PleasantMt. Pleasant, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of PortagePortage, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ShorelineSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of Tawas CityTawas City, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of TaylorTaylor, MI 3 of 5Medilodge of ZeelandZeeland, MI 3 of 5The Lodge at TaylorTaylor, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of GaylordGaylord, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of HollandHolland, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LansingLansing, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of LeelanauSuttons Bay, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of MilfordMilford, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of OkemosOkemos, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of RichmondRichmond, MI 4 of 5Medilodge of Traverse CityTraverse City, MI 5 of 5Medilodge of AlpenaAlpena, MI

Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARK OPCO GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2015
B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
B&Y TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CODY HEALTHCARE S CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2015
NORCROSS, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
ROGERS, STACEYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2015
KIRK, KRISTINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2016
FLASHNER, CRAIGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
NOBLE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2015
PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$543K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 4%Other / private 24%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $543K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$350per resident / day
operating cost
$10,637per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$331per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235653. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next