Medilodge of Cheboygan

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 48% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 77.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.28 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.47 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to intake #2661622Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the right of one Resident (R1) to be free from physical and verbal abuse by a staff member of three residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial harm including feelings of humiliation and fear based on the reasonable-person concept. Findings include:A facility-reported incident (FRI) investigation summary submitted to the state agency on 11/3/25 disclosed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A and CNA B witnessed CNA C abuse Resident #1 (R1) while rendering post-fall assistance to R1 on 10/26/25. The facility investigation substantiated the abuse. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) of R1 revealed an admission date of 3/18/25 with a primary diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke). Additional diagnoses included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, age-related cognitive decline, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, weakness, fatigue, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00147076 and MI00147197. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate assessments and communication for change in condition for one Resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for change in condition, resulting in harm when Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital for mental status changes, found to have a severe wound infection and underwent subsequent intravenous antibiotic administration and surgical intervention. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) Review of R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment, dated 6/24/2024, revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including lumbar fracture, diabetes, anxiety and dementia. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R2 scored six out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of R2's MDS data revealed R2 was discharged to a short-term stay, acute-care hospital on 9/03/2024.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Intake #MI00143052 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, document, and provide treatment per professional standards of practice for one (resident #3) of one resident reviewed for diabetes management, resulting in diabetic ketoacidosis (emergent condition resulting from prolonged elevated blood sugar levels), hospitalization and death. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R3, revealed the most recent admission to the facility was on 10/20/23 post fall at home with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture T5-T6, pelvis fracture, stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, diabetes type II, peripheral vascular disease, colostomy, chronic kidney disease stage 3 and prior history of neoplasm of large intestine and cervix. R3 was previously admitted from 4/5/23 to 5/20/23 and was familiar to the facility. Review of the discharge summary for admission to the facility from (Regional Acute Care Hospital)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assessment, monitoring, and care per facility policy and professional standards for treatment with a nebulizer for one Resident (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for inhaled medication administration.Findings include: On 4/13/26 at 7:30 PM, during medication administration, Registered Nurse (RN) B was not observed to perform vital signs or respiratory assessment/lung sounds prior or post administration of a nebulized respiratory treatment. RN B did not instruct Resident #2 (R2) to take deep breaths during the treatment and did not remain with resident to observe for change in condition. After completion of the treatment, RN B stated to R2 shh I am trying to listen to your lungs, RN B then leaned closer to the resident. RN B did not have a stethoscope.On 4/13/26 at 7:50 PM, an interview was conducted with RN B regarding assessment pre and post administration of a nebulizer treatment. RN B stated you should listen to lung sounds pre and post treatment. When asked if she had completed a respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure follow-up to a change in condition according to professional standards of practice for two Residents (#11 and #75) of three resident's reviewed for change in condition. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for complications and worsening of condition.Findings include:Resident #11 (R11) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/24/2026, revealed R11 was admitted to the facility on 3/ 10/2024 and had diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia. Review of R11's April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed the following physician's orders: Humalog KwikPen (rapid-acting insulin) Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100 unit/ML [milliliter]. Inject per sliding scale: If 0-199 = 0 units; 200-249 = 2 units; 250-299 = 4 units; 300-349 = 6 units; 350-399 = 8 units; 400+ = 10 units. If blood sugar is 400 or greater must contact provider . Start Date:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure wound care was completed according to physician order and professional standards of practice for one Resident (#6) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings include:Resident #6 (R6)Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/01/2026, revealed R6 had severely impaired cognition and an unhealed, facility-acquired Stage 3 (full-thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcer.Further review of the EMR revealed R6 was currently undergoing daily monitoring for signs and symptoms of sepsis (severe systemic response to infection). Review of the Pertinent Charting - Infections/Signs/Symptoms, dated 4/13/2026 at 3:08 a.m., revealed the following: Follow up to infection signs/symptoms . Site of originally identified infection: sacral wound.Review of the April 2026 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor fluids and provide the diet as ordered for one Resident (R99) of three residents reviewed for fluid concerns.Findings include:Resident #99 (R99)The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R99 revealed an admission date of 4/9/2026 with diagnoses including : altered mental status, unspecified, chronic kidney disease, essential (primary) hypertension, and retention of urine. The Physician's orders of 4/9/2026 included, Diet order Fluid Restriction-1200 ml (milliliters) diet Regular texture, Regular fluid, thin consistency.The EMR contained a care plan for R99 which included Focus -Resident is at risk for fluid volume deficit related to POST COVID-19 CONDITION, UNSPECIFIED; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, STAGE 3A Date Initiated: 04/09/2026. The interventions for this care plan included, Encourage resident to drink fluids of choice unless contraindicated (i.e., fluid restriction); assist as needed. The care plan also included, Offer fluids…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for dialysis, monitor a dialysis access site, report dialysis concerns to the physician, care plan potential fluid volume overload, and adhere to physician-prescribed fluid restrictions for one Resident (#8) of one resident reviewed for dialysis.Findings include:Resident #8 (R8)R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of ESRD (End-Stage Renal Disease). A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R8 received hemodialysis treatments at an off-site dialysis facility.Multiple attempts were made to interview R8 on 4/13/26. Registered Nurse (RN) F, the nurse assigned to the unit where R8 resided, said R8 was at dialysis and would be available on 4/14/26.The electronic medical record (EMR) of R8 was reviewed on 4/13/26. The EMR did not contain a physician's order for dialysis. There was no physician's order for monitoring a dialysis vascular access site.Interviews were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately dispense insulin to two Residents (Residents #2, #11) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in 2 errors in 34 opportunities for error and a 5.88% medication error rate.Findings Include: On 4/13/26 at 7:39 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) B was observed administering insulin to Resident #2 (R2) and held the subcutaneous injection site for six seconds.On 4/13/26 at 7:40 PM, an interview was conducted with RN B regarding how long she was to hold the injection site and replied, Ten seconds. RN B was made aware she only held the needle in place for six seconds. RN B remarked, I must have counted fast .On 4/13/26 at 8:03 PM, RN C was observed administering insulin to Resident #11 (R11) and held the subcutaneous injection site for 5 seconds.On 4/13/26 at 8:05 PM, an interview was conducted with RN C regarding how long she was to hold the injection site and replied, Ten seconds. RN C was made aware she only held the needle in place for five seconds. RN C remarked, I thought I held it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:Identify appropriate required Transmission Based Precautions (TBP),Obtain a physician's order timely for isolation precautions,Appropriately apply and remove personal protective equipment (PPE),Utilize PPE when indicated, and;Discontinue an antibiotic medication or document justification for continuing antibiotic medication when test results were negative for Resident #2, affecting three Residents (#2, #16, & #12) of six residents reviewed for infection prevention and control.Findings include:Resident #2 (R2) On 4/13/26 at 11:35 AM, a sign for airborne precautions (an isolation measure used to prevent the spread of infectious agents that can be spread through the air over long distances) was observed posted outside the door of R2's room. The airborne precautions sign read: STOP: AIRBORNE PRECAUTIONS. EVERYONE MUST [sic]: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Put on a fit-tested N-95 [filtering facepiece…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and administer COVID vaccinations to two Resident (#2 & #4) of five residents reviewed for immunizations.Findings include:Resident #2 (R2)R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Vaccination consent forms for pneumococcal and Influenza vaccinations were e-signed by R2 on 1/20/26. A vaccination consent form for COVID-19 was not located in the medical record of R2.A Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR - a statewide immunization information system that tracks vaccinations and health data for residents of Michigan) was reviewed on 4/15/26. The MICR documented R2 was [AGE] years of age. The MCIR indicated the immunization status of the COVID-19 2025-26 vaccine was Overdue.On 4/15/26 at 12:53 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) I was interviewed. RN I confirmed she was responsible for tracking vaccine consents and administrations. RN I said R2 was not provided the COVID-19 vaccination consent form when she was admitted on [DATE].Resident #4 (R4)Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement safe and effective infection prevention and control (IPC) practices for eight residents (#10, #30, #14, #59, #50, #67, #6, and #65) of ten residents reviewed for IPC to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failure to: 1. Maintain room doors closed for residents with COVID-19. 2. Appropriately sanitize and disinfect contaminated medical equipment. 3. Remove Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to exiting the room of a resident with COVID-19 on Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). 4. Prepare and handle medications in a manner to prevent contamination. 5. Ensure care plans were initiated for residents with COVID-19. 6. Ensure physicians' orders for were obtained before placing residents in TBP. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the transmission of pathogens between residents and the spread of infectious organisms to all 67 residents in the facility. Findings include: Resident #10 (R10) R10, who was on hospice services,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respectful treatment and a dignified dining experience for three Residents (#18, #20, and #58) of five residents reviewed for residents' rights. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for feelings of frustration, embarrassment, and humiliation. Findings include: Resident #18 (R18) R18 was admitted to the facility on hospice services on 9/9/24. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R18 was dependent on staff for eating. On 1/14/25 at 11:22 a.m., R18 was observed awaiting the lunch meal in the dining room in a high-back mobile reclining chair seated at a table next to the hospice Social Worker (SW). The SW was using a cell phone and laptop computer. The SW was not speaking with or interacting with R18. The SW was drinking from a Styrofoam cup. R18 was not provided or offered fluids while waiting for his meal. R18 sat and watched the SW drinking from the cup and using the cell phone and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,348 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $29,348 — penalty dated 2024-09-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $417K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI