Medilodge of Milford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 188 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 105.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly use a Hoyer mechanical lift to transfer one resident (R51) of two residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in the mechanical lift falling on R51 causing a laceration to their head requiring a trip to the emergency room for imaging and treatment with staples to close the wound. Findings include: On 9/24/25 at 12:27 PM, a review of R51's progress notes was conducted and revealed the following: A nursing progress note entered into the record by Nurse 'I' dated 6/13/25 at 11:31 PM that read, Cena (nurse aide) informed me that lodger was being transferred to shower chair and hoyer tip <sic> and bumped her head. 1 inch laceration noted .New order to send to hospital noted . A nursing progress note entered into the record by Nurse 'J' dated 6/14/25 at 3:36 AM that read, (Ambulance Company) transported Lodger to (Hospital Name) for eval. (evaluation) due to head injury . A nursing progress note entered into the record by Nurse 'J' dated 6/14/25 at 4:45 AM that read, Lodger return with EMS (Emergency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI 00133995 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely interventions to reduce the risk of pressure ulcer development, perform accurate and timely skin assessments and ensure orders were clarified for one (R38) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in R38 acquiring a device related pressure ulcer on the spine. Findings Include: R 38 On 9/12/23 at 9:50 AM, R38 was observed lying in bed on her back sleeping. Padded boots were observed in a wheelchair against the wall across from the bed. R38 was asked if they had any wounds or sores on their body. R38's Family Member present in the room explained R38 had a wound on her ankle and a wound on her back from a back brace. When asked about the wound on R38's ankle, R38's Family Member lifted up the bed covers and a flat pillow was observed under R38's lower legs, however her heels were in direct contact with the mattress. R38's Family Member was asked how she got the wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00131500. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate interventions to prevent weight loss for one resident (R90) of five residents reviewed for nutrition, resulting in a 15.69% weight loss from June 2023 to August 2023. Findings include: On 9/13/23 at 8:23 AM, R90's breakfast meal tray was observed on their bedside table in their room. The items on the meal tray were compared to the items on the meal ticket and it was noticed R90 had not been given their Health Shake supplement. It was further noted R90's tray had been set up for them, but R90 was laying at less than a 30-degree angle (almost flat) in their bed attempting to feed themselves some pureed eggs. No staff were observed in the room at that time. On 9/13/23 at 12:21 PM, an observation of R90's lunch meal was conducted. The items on the tray were compared to the meal ticket and it was noted R90 was supposed to receive a Health Shake supplement, however; the Health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement timely preventative interventions for pressure injury for one (R30) of one Resident reviewed for pressure injury prevention/management. Findings include:R30A review of R30's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, depression and bladder dysfunction. Based on R30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R30 needed substantial staff assistance for their mobility in bed. A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) completed on admission R30 had a score of 15/15 (indicative off intact cognition). A wound care provider note dated 6/17/25 revealed that R30 had a recommendation for a wheelchair cushion. An initial observation was completed on 9/23/25, at approximately 10:15 AM. R30 was observed sitting in their wheelchair on a Hoyer lift (total body lift) sling with no wheelchair cushion. An initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure social work services were implemented in a timely and efficient manner for one (R7) out of one resident reviewed for Social Service/Advanced Directives. Findings include:A review of R7's clinical record noted the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: congestive heart failure, fatty liver and dementia with mood disorder. A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 (severely cognitively impaired).Continued review of R7's record noted, in part, the following:[DATE]: Nurse's Note: Pt (patient) educated, understood and signed psych medication consent form.Both forms given to social worker.XXX[DATE]: Consent of Psychoactive Medication Therapy: .Psychoactive Medication Order: Quetiapine/Seroquel 25 mg (an antipsychotic primarily used to treat bipolar and/or schizophrenia) .Specific Condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00146265 and MI00148408. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were implemented for one resident (R904) with a history of falls out of three residents reviewed for falls resulting in the potential for recurrence of falls and injury. Findings include: On 12/4/24, a clinical record review revealed R904 was admitted to the facility for nursing care and rehabilitation on 11/15/24. R904 required surgical intervention for a fall sustained at home resulting in a right hip fracture. R904's medical history included chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, heart disease, and heart attack. A BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was unobtainable when assessed due to acute delirium with hallucinations. Clinical record review revealed R904 sustained a fall at the facility on 11/17/24 and 11/26/24. Care plan initiated on 11/16/24 and revised on 11/27/24 documented Resident Focus: .at risk for falls/injury related to debility, right hip <sic> FX (fracture), encephalopathy and possible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nursing care and services according to professional standards of practice for one (R203) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: On 8/12/24 at 10:18 AM, R203 was observed lying in bed. R203 was receiving nutrition via a PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) tube (a tube surgically placed into the stomach to deliver nutrition). The PEG tube pump was running at 45 milliliters per hour (ml/hr) and the bottle of formula was dated 8/12/24. On 8/13/24 at 9:01 AM, R203 was observed lying in bed. R203 was receiving nutrition via a PEG tube. The PEG tube pump was running at 45 ml/her and the bottle of formula was dated 8/13/24. A review of R203's clinical record revealed R203 was admitted into the facility on 7/22/24 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: prostate cancer, chronic kidney disease, and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. A review of an Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess wounds, perform wound care treatments, coordinate with a comprehensive wound care team consisting of a wound care practitioner, document treatment plans, and implement physician's orders for wound care treatments for two residents, (R#'s 101 and 305) of three residents reviewed for skin impairments, resulting in verbalized complaints, fear of staff competency and infection, and R101 voluntarily leaving the facility for wound care at the hospital. Findings include: R101 On 8/13/24 at 2:09 PM, a review of R101's closed record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. R101's diagnoses included: cutaneous abscess of buttock, and hidradenitis suppurativa, a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, and scarring. R101's post-operative records from the hospital revealed they underwent incision and drainage of multiple buttock, back, thigh, and perianal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely assess pressure ulcers present on admission into the facility in a timely manner, and implement preventative measures to maintain skin integrity for one (R203) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 8/12/24 at 10:18 AM, R203 was observed lying on his back in bed. Two pairs of heel protector boots were observed in the room, on a chair and on the floor, not applied to R203's feet. R203's feet were pressed against the foot board of the bed. A low air loss mattress was observed. R203 reported he had sores on his feet. A review of R203's clinical record revealed R203 was admitted into the facility on 7/22/24 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: prostate cancer, chronic kidney disease, and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A review of an Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R203 had intact cognition, required substantial/maximum assistance for bed mobility and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough and accurate assessment was done upon admission, physician's orders for an indwelling urinary catheter were in place, and the catheter was securely anchored for one (R204) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings include: On 8/12/24 at 10:25 AM, R204 was observed sleeping in a chair in the room where his wife resided. R204's was observed with tubing from a urinary catheter exiting the bottom of his long pajama pants. The urinary catheter drainage bag was observed hung on R204's walker which was next to the resident and therefore the tubing was stretched from the pant leg to the walker. On 8/13/24 at 10:25 AM, R204 was observed ambulating with a walker. Tubing from the urinary catheter was observed coming out of the bottom of R204's pant leg and attached to the drainage bag that was attached to the bottom of the walker making contact with the floor. The tubing was observed dragging on the floor as R204…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care was provided to prevent dislodgement of a PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) tube (a tube surgically placed into the stomach to deliver nutrition), physicians orders for nutrition and hydration were in place, and care to the PEG tube site was provided according to physician's orders for one (R203) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding, resulting in the PEG tube being torn from R203's stomach requiring a hospital transfer, the potential for poor nutritional and hydration status, pain, infection and skin breakdown. Findings include: On 8/12/24 at 10:18 AM, R203 was observed lying in bed. R203 was receiving nutrition via a PEG tube. The PEG tube pump was running at 45 milliliters per hour (ml/hr) and the bottle of formula was dated 8/12/24. On 8/13/24 at 9:01 AM, R203 was observed lying in bed. R203 was receiving nutrition via a PEG tube. The PEG tube pump was running at 45 ml/her and the bottle of formula…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a physician and/or physician extender evaluated and assessed a new/worsened pressure ulcer for one (R85) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the lack of pressure ulcer assessment by the physician, and the potential for inconsistent and timely documentation of wound status, and/or decline of the wound. Findings include: On 8/12/24 at 12:21 PM, R85 was observed in room appeared to be resting. When R85 was asked how they were doing and stated that their bottom was hurting and could not get comfortable due to the pain, other than that R85 was content. A record review revealed that R85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's diseases, pressure ulcers of sacral region and muscle weakness. R85 had a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating an intact cognition. A further review of the chart revealed that R85's wound care orders had been updated that morning 8/12/24. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure labs were obtained timely for one resident (R40) of one resident reviewed for labs, resulting in the potential for unmet medical care needs. Findings include: On 8/12/24 at 1:20 PM, a review of R40's clinical record revealed a note entered into the record on 7/8/24 by Nurse Practitioner (NP) 'G' that read, .Check a CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel, a routine blood test that measures 14 different substances in a blood sample) and CBC (complete blood count, a blood test to look at a wide range of conditions) to monitor fluid volume status . A note entered into R40's record by Nurse 'I' on 7/19/24 at 10:48 AM was reviewed and read, .Resident asked nurse why his blood work from 7/8/24 still hadn't been completed yet, Dr. ('H') in the building at the time and resident asked her about it. Dr. ('H') ordered for blood work to be reordered STAT today . Continued review of R40's record revealed a note entered into R40's record by Nurse 'I' on 7/23/24 at 12:00 PM that read, .Resident stated that he still had not gotten…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI