Medilodge of St. Clair
4220 S. Hospital Drive, East China, MI 48054 · For profit - Corporation · 158 certified beds · (810) 329-4736 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.7% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.2% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.3% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.5% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.4% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.0% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 33.9% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.4% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.1% | 11.7% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.47 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.29 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 70.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.8%CMS range 36.6–55.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.7–12.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 70.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.4–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 117.3 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose of waste and maintain dumpster area to mitigate the presence of pests, potentially affecting all residents in the facility. Findings include:On 12/8/25 at approximately 7:50 AM, the facility's exterior trash refuse area was observed with Food Service Manager D. The dumpsters were observed to be overflowing with stacked up trash bags. The bags were piled up beyond the top edge of the containers, to the point where the lids could not be closed. When queried at that time, Food Service Manager D stated that the containers were usually overflowing after the weekend. When queried regarding how often the containers were emptied, Food Service Manager D stated, I believe once a week. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-501.110 Storing Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnables, REFUSE, recyclables, and returnables shall be stored in receptacles or waste handling units so that they are inaccessible to insects and rodents.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by eliminating harborage conditions. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. Findings include: On 12/8/25 at 7:35 AM, the facility's dish machine was observed. Underneath the soiled side drain board, there was a build-up of sludge on the floor tiles, and the flooring was damp. There was a cup and a small bowl which had accumulated on the floor along the back wall. There were numerous gnats observed on the pipes and the back wall under the soiled drain board. When queried at that time, Food Service Manager D confirmed the presence of the gnats and stated that the flooring was in need of a good cleaning. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 6-501.111 Controlling Pests. The PREMISES shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the PREMISES by: (A)Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of FOOD and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake number 2660263.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to answer call lights and to provide timely resident care for four residents (R19, R20, R23, R131) and six group residents in a census of 120. Findings include: On 12/08/2025 at 8:47 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A was asked about staffing levels and reported staffing is horrible and reported they had twenty patients to care for over the weekend due to call ins and med techs not helping with patients on the floor. On 12/08/2025 at 9:04 AM, R23 reported that on average there is not enough staff to take care of the residents three times a week. R23 feels this happens most often on the midnight shift. R23 reported wait times up to 45 minutes for call lights to be answered. R23 further reported this was due to the aides working shorthanded. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented an admission into the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable food items per the resident's preference for four residents (R20, R55, R69 and R80) and eight resident council group members from a census of 120. Findings include: On 12/8/25 at 9:17 AM, R69 was interviewed about the food served to them at the facility and indicated the food was cold and didn't taste good. A review of R69's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R69 had an intact cognition. On 12/9/25 at 1:15 PM, a resident council meeting was conducted between the surveyor and eight group members. All eight group members expressed concerns regarding the temperature and taste of the food served to them A review of the resident council meeting minute documentation revealed palatable food and temperature concerns expressed by the group during the months of July, October, November, and December 2025. A review of resident food committee meeting minute documentation revealed cold food concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the right to share a room with their spouse and failed to provide written notice, including reason for the change, prior to a room change for one sampled resident (R19) of nine reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: On 12/08/2025 at 9:36 AM, R19 reported that they were upset because the facility changed their room, which separated them from their spouse. During the interview R19 was observed to cry and be visibly upset due to the emotions they were feeling. R19 stated, They never should have divided us. R19 reported they had been married for three months and only had about three weeks together in the same room. R19 further explained the facility gave them about a 10 minute notice before the room change occurred. On 12/10/2025 at 2:44 PM, Social Services C was asked about the room change with R19 and reported they were not involved with the room change. Social Services C further explained, they talked to the couple on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to complaint number 2686759.Based on interviews/record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (R106) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R104) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of an incident and accident report dated 11/28/25 and involving R104 and R106 indicated the following, R104 was having a behavioral episode in the hallway, as another resident (R106) was walking down the hallway past them. R104 approached R106 and placed their hands around R106's neck and started squeezing. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H intervened and R104 let go of R106's neck and pushed R106 causing them to fall on their knees and then on their buttocks. R104 was redirected away from the other residents. R106 stated, [R104] was choking me, almost killed me. Vital signs and skin assessment was completed on R106. Observation made of abrasion on R106's front of right knee and redness to elbow. R104A record review of social work progress notes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening Annual Resident Review for mental health needs) was completed timely for two residents (R11, R75) of three reviewed for PASARR completion. Findings include: R11 A review of the facility records for R11 revealed R11 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Schizoaffective Disorder, Stroke and High Blood Pressure. R11 has continued to reside at the facility. The PASARR form dated 09/24/25 documented it as a hospital exempted discharge which indicated R11 was expected to remain at the facility less than thirty days. An additional level one PASARR was required after 30 days. Further record review revealed no additional PASARR had been entered into the medical record. On 12/10/25 at 1:12 PM and 4:15 PM the additional level one PASARR was requested. At 4:35 PM the facility reported the additional level one PASARR had not been completed. R75 A review of R75's medical record revealed they were admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2660263.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for three sampled residents (R19, R55, and R80) of six reviewed for ADLs. Findings include: R19On 12/08/2025 at 9:36 AM, R19's bed was observed with a large wet area in the middle of the bed. R19 reported they were not changed during the midnight shift. R19 reported they have to wait a long time for assistance at times. Further review of R19's medical record revealed, R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Right femur fracture. A review of R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment noted R19 with moderately impaired cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living. R55On 12/08/2025 at 11:19 AM, R55 reported that one day they waited over two hours to be cleaned after having a soiled brief. R55 also reported they had been told by staff they were too busy to provide their scheduled showers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medications as ordered for one resident (R63) of one resident reviewed for pain management. Findings include: On 12/08/2025 at 8:12 AM, R63 was observed in their room and asked about their care in the facility. They explained they had been dealing with pain and hadn't received their prescribed Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) last night as they were told it was out of stock. R63 further explained they were provided with Tylenol but admits that it doesn't provide relief the way the Oxycodone does. A review of R63's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 8/29/25 with diagnoses which included Chronic Pain Syndrome, Heart Failure, and Diabetes. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required one-person assist for activities of daily living. A review of R63's care plan revealed the following, Focus: .related to back pain, UTI (urinary tract infection). Date Initiated: 11/28/2025 .Interventions: Administer medications per orders and observe for side effects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were available for two residents (R8 and R132) of three reviewed for medications. Findings include: R132 On 12/08/2025 at 10:51 AM, R132 reported missing doses of their medication for a number of days when they first arrived at the facility. R132 They screwed up my meds. R132 reported they were supposed to get eye drops and didn't get them until about 12/7/25. R132 also reported there was a delay with getting their antibiotic medication. A review of R132's medical record noted, Progress note: 11/28/2025 18:08 (6:08 PM) Nursing Evaluation Summary. Res arrived via EMS (Emergency Medical Services) from [local] Hospital approx. 1445 (2:45 PM) with daughter. A review of R132's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of November 2025 noted, Cefazolin Sodium Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 2 GM (gram) (Cefazolin Sodium). Use 2 gram intravenously three times a day for MSSA (Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications for one resident (R6) of one reviewed for medication storage, ensure expired medications were discarded when opened, and inhalers were labeled with a resident identifier and/or an opened date in one of four medication carts. Findings include: R6 On 12/08/2025 at 7:32 AM, during a tour of the Dementia unit, R6 was observed in bed asleep. A medication cup containing two pills was observed on the resident's nightstand. On 12/08/2025 at 7:39 AM, an unidentified nurse was asked to observe the medications at R6's bedside and explained they had not begun to pass medications on the day shift and further explained they are not aware of how long those medications had been on the nightstand. A review of R6's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 8/27/25 with diagnoses of Alcohol Dependence with Alcohol-Induced Persisting Dementia, Metabolic Encephalopathy, and Major Depressive Disorder. Further review revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and medical device cleaning was completed during medication pass for one resident (R89) of four residents observed during observed. Findings include: On 12/10/2025 8:23 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I was observed during a medication pass for R89. LPN I was observed to remove five oral medications, a glucometer, a lancet, glucose (blood sugar) test strip and an alcohol pad from the medication cart. LPN I reported they wanted to recheck R89's blood sugar. The medications were dispensed into a small plastic cup. LPN I brought the items into the resident's room and donned gloves. The medication cup was handed to R89 by LPN I. The lancet was used to prick a finger on the left hand of R89 to get the blood sample for the meter onto the glucose test strip. LPN I doffed their gloves and returned to the medication cart. The glucometer was returned to the medication cart. LPN I prepared an insulin injection for R89 using an insulin pen. A needle was applied to the pen and the amount dialed onto…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: 2584046.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer physician order medication in a timely manner for two (R900, R901) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:R900A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R900 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Right non-union intertrochanteric hip fracture after a fall, hypertension, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), legally blind, and anemia. Further review of the EMR revealed the resident was cognitively intact.On 9/4/25, a review of the August 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed medications were administered later than one hour outside the window of one hour before and one hour after the designated scheduled time. The record revealed on the day shift (7:00 AM-3:30 PM) over a 10-day period (August 1 thru 10, 2025), R900's morning medication, which were due at 8:00 AM, was administered after 9:00 AM six of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00149376. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for blood pressure medication hold parameters for one resident (R300) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: A review of R300's admission facesheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD). Further review of the medical record revealed R300 had a moderately impaired cognition. A review of R300's physician orders revealed the following active orders dated 11/6/24: 1. Metoprolol Succinate ER oral tablet Extended Release 24-hour 25 mg (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure) and, 2. Losartan Potassium Oral tablet 100mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential primary hypertension. There were no orders to check the blood pressure prior to administering the blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a pest-free environment, resulting in flies in the facility and resident complaints. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/1/24 at 2:45 PM, there were several flies observed in the 100 hallway. On 10/1/24 at 2:50 PM, the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be open. The exterior screen frame was observed to be bent, leaving an approximately 1 inch gap. The screen was not tight-fitting, to prevent pest entry into the room. On 10/1/24 at 3:00 PM, Maintenance Supervisor V confirmed the bent screen, and stated he would take care of it right away. Maintenance Supervisor V stated that he was unaware of any current fly issue in the facility. Review of a Quality Assistance Form dated 4/4/24 noted: Details: RM [ROOM NUMBER]-2 .screen has gap and not fitting frame of window. Would like to open window when weather permits .Plan of Action: .unable to bend frame…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for medication administration for two residents (R71, R107) of nine residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 10/2/24 at 7:40 AM, during the dining room observation, Registered Nurse (RN) J was observed administering medication from a cup which contained a yellowish fruit puree to R107. When RN J completed the medication administration with R107, the nurse subsequently administered medication from a different medication cup to R71, without first returning to the medication cart, sign off that R107 had received their medications, performed hand hygiene, and separately prepare R71's medications. The facility record revealed R71 was admitted on [DATE] with the following pertinent diagnoses: Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Atrial Fibrillation, Dysphagia, Aphasia, and Alzheimer's Disease. The facility record revealed R107 was admitted on [DATE] with the following pertinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply compression stockings as physician ordered for one (R111) of four residents reviewed for care standards. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R111 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Localized Edema. R111's Physician Orders included an active status order which stated Compression stockings to be applied to bilateral lower extremities before getting out of bed for the day and removed at bedtime one time per day for pedal edema. On 10/01/24 at 12:23 PM, R111 was observed in the dining room waiting for lunch. The resident's feet/ankles were visible as they were wearing slippers that only covered the toes and outer edge of the feet and the feet appeared to be swollen and more red in color than their skin otherwise. Compression stockings were notobserved to be in place. On 10/01/24 at 03:25 PM, R111 was asked about compression stockings and they stated They don't put them on anymore. Additional review of R111's record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the status of wound from non-pressure to pressure classification and implement interventions (adequate seating and positioning) for a Stage 4 (full thickness skin loss that extends through the skin into the muscle, bone, tendon or joint) pressure ulcer for one Resident (R64) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 10/01/24 at 10:17 a.m., R64 was observed in their room seated in a high back manual wheelchair, in a reclined position. Their right leg was internally rotated, with their legs positioned up on elevating footrests. R64 reported they had pain all over, reported as 5/10 with 5 being moderate pain. R64 was seated directly on their buttocks and thighs on a pressure relief cushion in their wheelchair. On 10/01/24 at 10:31 a.m., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) S was asked about R64's care, and reported R64 was dependent for all care including feeding. Review of R64's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice #1. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide recommended restorative therapy for one (R59) of three residents reviewed for restorative therapy services. Findings include: On 10/01/24 at 12:45 p.m., R59 was observed seated in their wheelchair in their room. On 10/01/24 at 12:48 p.m., R59 reported they were not walking with staff, or regularly receiving their restorative therapy exercises. R59 stated, .I don't even get it [restorative therapy] once a week. I ask them in the hallway what they are doing and say range of motion [with other residents]. That bothers me, I need to walk . Review of R59's Restorative Program referral, dated 7/29/24, revealed, Walking: Distance: 3' with 2 WW [two-wheeled walker]. Assistance Required: Min [minimal assistance]. Instruct to increase t [weight] on right [side] .ROM: Extremity: See exercise sheets. Frequency: 5x/ wk. [five times a week] . Review of R59 restorative therapy logs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely and properly store portable oxygen for one (R27) of four residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R27 revealed an admission date of 10/12/19 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Respiratory Failure. R27's current physician orders include O2 two liters continuous with humidification. On 10/01/24 at 10:03 AM, during initial interview R27 was using their oxygen concentrator. A portable oxygen tank was observed in a tank holder attached to the resident's four wheeled walker. A second portable tank was observed in a wheeled cart near the bathroom. R27's roommate was not using oxygen and when asked about the second tank R27 stated That's mine. They keep an extra one sometimes so they don't have to go get it but I'm not sure why its over by [R27's roommate]. On 10/02/24 at 01:09 PM, the extra oxygen tank observed on 10/01/24 remained stored in R24's room near the bathroom. On 10/03/24 at 10:30 AM, the oxygen tank previously observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for two (R61, R93) of two residents receiving nebulizer treatments. Findings include: R61 On 10/1/24 at 9:02 AM, R61 was observed with a nebulizer treatment in progress. R61 was adjusting the positioning of the device. A nurse was not present. On 10/1/24 at 9:30 AM, R61 was observed to have completed their nebulizer treatment. A nurse was not present. Review the facility record revealed R61 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization for exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Obstructive Sleep Apnea, and Dyspnea. A Brief Interview for Mental Status revealed a score of 11/15 indicating Mild Cognitive Impairment. On 10/3/2024 at 9:24 AM, a query of R61 revealed the nurse usually sets up their nebulizer treatment and starts it, then usually leaves the room. R61 revealed most nurses do that. R61 revealed when the treatment is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, and facility failed to provide medically related social services for two Residents (R23 and R73) of eight residents reviewed for medically-related social services. Findings include: R23 On 10/02/24 at 3:03 p.m., R23 reported they had asked multiple staff to be discharged from hospice services, as they wanted to have therapy assess them to see if they could improve their transfers to possibly be discharged home. R23 reported they felt frustrated, as they had been on hospice a couple of years and had never been on therapy. R23 was aware they had a guardian but had been unable to reach them about their wishes and also felt frustrated with having a guardian. R23 reported they had also shared their wishes with facility staff and the hospice nurse and had not heard back. On 10/02/24 at approximately 3:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about R23's reported wishes to come off hospice care and related concerns. The DON reported they had been made aware of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to put a 14 day stop date on an PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication for one resident (R60) out of two reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: A review of the medical record revealed that R60 admitted into the facility on 1/30/2024 with the following medical diagnoses, End Stage Renal Disease and Atrial Fibrillation. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R60 also required staff assistance with transfers and bed mobility. A review of the physician orders revealed the following order. Ativan Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams) (Lorazepam). Directions: Give one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for restlessness or anxiety. Status: Active. Start Date: 8/28/2024. No end date was noted on the order. On 10/3/2024 at 10:36 AM, an interview was conducted with Social Worker (SW) B. SW B stated R60 is on hospice, and they put PRN orders in often and don't communicate it sometimes. SW B stated they are working on it and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one unattended medication cart (the C-wing cart) of three carts reviewed was locked during medication administration. Findings included: On 10/02/24 at 9:00 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) R was observed preparing R49's medications to be passed from the C-wing cart. R49 agreed to Surveyor observing them take their medications. Once RN R placed R49's medications in a pill cup, they walked into R49's room, and left the medication cart unlocked, leaving the cart unsupervised and accessible to residents and staff. RN R began administering medications to R49, in the second bed in the room, and was not aware they left the medication cart unlocked, as they did not stop and lock the cart, and their back was to the cart. Surveyor was observing R49's medication administration when they saw R49's roommate wheel into the hallway and place their wheelchair on the left side of the medication cart. Surveyor next observed a maintenance staff member place their wheeled maintenance supply cart in front of the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation,interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two residents (R5 and R60) out of two reviewed for medical records. Findings include: R5 A review of the medical record revealed that R5 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses, Recurrent Dislocation, Left Shoulder and Pain in Left Shoulder. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS) of 12/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R5 also required staff assistance with transfers and bed mobility. Further review of the physician's orders revealed the following active orders, Sling and Swathe to left upper extremity at all times. May remove for skin checks and showers. Status: Active. Ordered:2/9/2023. Apply arm sling to left upper extremity when out of bed, adjust snug to chest. Check for circulation after each application. Only Apply when resident is out of bed. Status: Active. Ordered: 9/17/2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control guidelines for glove use for one (R92) of one resident reviewed for infecton control. Findings include: On 10/2/24 at 7:40 AM, RN J was observed providing a subcutaneous injection to R92 without wearing gloves during a community breakfast. On 10/3/24 at 10:30 AM, the Infection Control and Prevention Practitioner (ICP) I was queried regarding the need for gloves during any injection. ICP I revealed gloves are required for IM injections, not necessarily for subcutaneous (insulin) injections. On 10/3/24 @ 11:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was queried regarding giving injections without gloves. The DON revealed that giving a subcutaneous injection (insulin) without gloves was OK. A review of the Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy, dated, Reviewed/Revised: 10/25/2022, under the subtitle Standard Precautions, revealed Licensed staff shall adhere to safe injection and medication administration practices, as described in relevant facility policies. The Center…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper concentration of chemical sanitizer, failed to ensure handwashing to prevent cross contamination, and failed to ensure hot food items were held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or higher. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 8/7/23 at 12:25 PM, 2 red sanitizer buckets with wiping cloths located in the main kitchen area, were tested and found to contain no sanitizer. District Manager Q stated they probably needed to be changed. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code, Section 3-304.14 Wiping Cloths, Use Limitation, .(B) Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces shall be: (1) Held between uses in a chemical sanitizer solution at a concentration specified under § 4-501.114; On 8/7/23 at 12:30 PM, Dietary Staff R was observed preparing food for the lunch meal. With gloved hands, Staff R was observed going into the walk in cooler, and was also observed lifting the lid of the garbage can to throw away…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable, homelike environment for three residents, (R4, R27, R102) of three residents reviewed for a comfortable homelike environment, resulting in verbalized complaints and dissatisfaction with the physical conditions of the building. Findings include: On 8/7/23 at 10:18 AM, R4 was asked about their stay in the facility, and explained that as long as they've been a resident in the facility, they have never seen anyone wash or paint the walls. R4 was asked how long they had been a resident in the facility and explained that it had been approximately eight years. R4 further stated, That's nasty. A review of R4's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 6/3/2015 with diagnoses of Hepatic Failure, Diabetes, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of R4's Minimum Data Set assessment revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. On 8/7/23 at 10:25 AM, R102 was observed sitting in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake M100136063. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (R88) right to be free from verbal abuse by staff. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R88 revealed an admission date of 01/21/22 with diagnoses that included Paraplegia, Wedge Compression Fracture of the Third Thoracic Vertebrae, Myocardial Infarction and Anoxic Brain Damage. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 04/24/23 indicated that R88 required total (dependent) staff assistance for toileting hygiene. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment scores of 15/15 indicating intact cognition. Review of an Incident received by the State Agency revealed that R88 alleged that on 04/03/23, while being assisted with toileting hygiene, requested additional assistance from Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) G who responded You can wipe your own a. R88 reported that when asking for assistance to clean their soiled hands CNA G responded You're a grown man, you can wash your own hands. On 08/07/23 at 10:02 AM, initial interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document and provide showers per resident schedule for one sampled resident (R41) of two reviewed for showers resulting in, dissatisfaction with hygiene and bathing care. Findings include: On 8/7/23 at 9:27 AM, R41 was observed lying in bed and asked about their stay in the facility. R41 explained that they are scheduled to receive showers three times a week, Mondays, Wednesdays and Saturdays, and had not been receiving their showers on Saturdays for several months. R41 explained that it's frustrating because they have been told the reason for not receiving the showers is due to short staffing. A review of R41's medical record revealed that she was admitted into the facility on 7/30/21 with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Diabetes, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated for 6/11/23 revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition, and required extensive assistance of 2 or more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that podiatry services were offered to one resident (R92) of one reviewed for ancillary services, resulting in discomfort and dissatisfaction with services. Findings include: On 8/7/23 at 11:43 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R92 was interviewed about their satisfaction with services at the facility. R92 indicated that they needed to see a podiatrist to have their toenails trimmed. R92 stated, They hurt. I've requested to see a podiatrist. An observation of R92's toenails revealed that they extended over the top of the toe and appeared jagged and twisted. On 8/8/23 at 9:00 AM, a review of R92's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed no documentation related to podiatry care or services. Further review revealed no podiatry goal/interventions observed on R92's care plan. R92 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End stage renal disease and fracture of neck. R92's most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to assure timely transportation to and from dialysis for one resident (R92) of one residents reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: On 8/7/23 at 11:43 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R92 was interviewed about services at the facility and indicated that they frequently waited an hour or more to be picked up from their dialysis appointments. R92 stated, It's across the parking lot. R92 expressed feelings of frustration over having to wait that long and indicated that the hour or more wait time occurred on a weekly basis. On 8/7/23 at 12:15 AM, verification was made that R92's dialysis provider was located within walking distance from the facility across the parking lot approximately three hundred yards away from the facility. On 8/8/23 at 9:00 AM, a review of R92's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R92 was scheduled to attend dialysis appointments on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday mornings. Further review of R92's EMR revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from one of three medications rooms and ensure resident medications were not left at the bedside for one resident (R68), resulting in the potential for decreased effectiveness of medication, lost doses of medication or medication not taken. Findings include: On 08/08/23 at 1:05 PM, the Desk One Medication room was checked with Licensed Practical Nurse N. Expired bottles of the OTC (over the counter) medication Melatonin were observed as noted: Expired 4/23, 22 bottles; Expired 2/23, three bottles; Expired 6/23, three bottles. A Magnesium OTC was also observed: Expired 4/23, one bottle. On 08/08/23 at 4:25 PM, the Unit Manager for the desk one medication room reported they had been made aware of the expired over the counter Melatonin and reported they had not been using the dosage and were moving the stock from central supply to the Desk One medication room. On 08/09/23 at 8:35 AM, the medication room observation was reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for three (R52, R92, R211) of ten residents reviewed for food concerns. Findings include: R52 Review of the facility record for R52 revealed an admission date of 03/29/23 with diagnoses that included Acute Kidney Failure, Sepsis and Stage Four Sacral Pressure Ulcer. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R52 primarily requires maximum assistance with self care tasks. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 indicated intact cognition. On 08/07/23 at 10:12 AM, R52 reported the food is poor and stated the hot food is usually cold and the meat is always too dry. It feels like they serve mashed potatoes every day. On 08/08/23 at 10:59 AM, R52 stated They gave me mashed potatoes again yesterday. When asked about their breakfast that morning R52 stated I only ate the cereal, I can't eat the eggs. Its usually powdered scrambled eggs that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that bedtime snacks were offered/provided to one resident (R40) of seven residents reviewed for bedtime snacks. Findings include: On 8/8/23 at 9:31 AM, resident council meeting notes were reviewed for the months of March 2023 to August 2023 and revealed the following regarding bedtime snacks, June 1, 2023, snacks not given; July 6, 2023, snacks not passed. On 8/8/23 at 10:35 AM, R40 was interviewed about being offered and provided bedtime snacks. R40 stated, I'm not aware when bedtime snacks are brought to the unit. I am not offered a bedtime snack. I would like a bedtime snack. On 8/8/23 at 11:02 AM, a thirty day review (7/8/23-8/8/23) was completed of R40's bedtime snack record in their electronic medical record (EMR) and revealed that R40 was offered bedtime snacks on 7/10, 7/25, 7/30, 8/1, and 8/7. No other documentation was present in R40's EMR to indicate whether R40 received or was offered a bedtime snack on the other days of the time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during resident provided care for three residents (R42, R76, R23) of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. Findings include: On 08/08/23 at 3:23 PM, a wound observation for R42 was completed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K. R42 was on enhanced contact isolation (gown and glove use during care) precautions. LPN K donned personal protective equipment (PPE), hand hygiene was completed and gloves were donned. The soiled dressing to the right buttock was removed, gloves removed and hand hygiene was done. New gloves were donned and the buttock wound was then cleansed and a new dressing applied. LPN K reached into their pocket under their isolation gown and removed a pen. No hand hygiene was completed. A date and time were then written on the dressing. This was repeated for the ankle wound. LPN K determined a larger dressing was needed for the ankle wound and therefore doffed the PPE, completed hand hygiene and returned with a new dressing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIFTEENINONE OPCO GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/24/2013 |
| B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/24/2013 |
| B&Y TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/24/2013 |
| CODY HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/24/2013 |
| CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/24/2013 |
| NORCROSS, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/24/2013 |
| ROGERS, STACEY | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/20/2014 |
| KIRK, KRISTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| FLASHNER, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/24/2013 |
| PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/24/2013 |
| GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/24/2013 |
| PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235370. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.