Medilodge of Taylor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 131.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake 3001431.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when medications were not administered as ordered for one resident (R902) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in missed opportunities for physician intervention, alternative treatment considerations and the potential for further spread of the resident's infection.Findings include:Record review of electronic medical record (EMR) of R902 revealed admission into the facility on 3/14/26 and discharged from the facility on 3/15/26, with pertinent diagnoses of chronic osteomyelitis (infection of bone) of the left ankle and foot and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder). Further review of EMR revealed that the resident was alert and oriented x 4 (person, place, time, and situation) upon admission to the facility.A phone interview was conducted with R902 on 5/15/26 at 10:17 AM. R902 reported that while at the facility the resident did not receive a dose of insulin or antibiotics that were prescribed. It was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings Include: On 12/8/25 at 9:40AM, observation of the kitchen hand sinks found that they have an automatic faucet that is activated by movement. Once activated, the sinks were only found to have a run time of 3-5 seconds unless continually reactivated. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-202.12 Handwashing Sink, Installation. (A) A HANDWASHING SINK shall be equipped to provide water at a temperature of at least 29.4 C (85 F) through a mixing valve or combination faucet. Pf (B) A steam mixing valve may not be used at a HANDWASHING SINK. (C) A self-closing, slow-closing, or metering faucet shall provide a flow of water for at least 15 seconds without the need to reactivate the faucet. On 12/8/25 at 9:50 AM, an interview with Dietary Manager (DM) D and Registered Dietician (RD) D found that the facility uses a cooling process for food two to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0813 — widespread
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully implement a policy regarding use and storage of resident foods brought in from outside sources resulting in the potential for nutritional decline and decreased satisfaction for all residents. Findings Include:On 12/8/25 at 10:52 AM, observation of the nourishment rooms' large refrigeration unit, found minimal food storage. When asked where residents would store food brought in from outside sources that needed refrigeration, Registered Dietician D, stated the facility does not have a refrigerator for residents and only has residents keep shelf stable products in their rooms. A record review of facility policy entitled, Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors, revised 7/1/25, found that It is the right of the residents of this facility to have food brought in by family or other visitors. The policy goes on to state that, The facility may refrigerate labeled and dated prepared items in the nourishment refrigerator., and that, . The facility staff will assist residents in accessing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided during care for one (R26) of two cognitively impaired residents and for five of eight cognitively intact residents that participated in an Anonymous Resident Council meeting reviewed for resident's rights, resulting in feelings of being ignored and discomfort.Findings include:On 12/10/2025 at 12:35 p.m., while standing in the hall across from R26's bedroom in which the door was closed, loud laughter could be heard coming from the bedroom. With moving closer to the door, two nurse aides (CNA G and CNA H) were heard laughing and talking loudly and having a personal conversation using profanity while giving R26 activity of daily living care. The aides did not verbally interact with R26, just with each other. After CNA G and H exited the room, R26 was observed resting in bed. An interview was attempted with R26, however was not completed due to the R26's impaired cognition. R26 appeared confused and had difficulty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food at a palatable temperature for five of eight cognitively intact residents that participated in an Anonymous Resident Council meeting, and all residents who consume food resulting in the potential for decreased food consumption and potential nutritional decline.Findings include:Anonymous Resident Council- On 12/11/25 at 11:00 a.m. an Anonymous Resident Council meeting was held with eight cognitively intact residents. Five of eight residents verbally expressed strong dissatisfaction with food services. One of the five residents that expressed concern of food palatability eats their meal in their room, the other four eat their meals in the dining room. The residents stated, Food that is supposed to (be) hot (soup) is cold and foods that are supposed to (be) cold are hot (ice cream). The grill cheese sandwiches are so cold that the bread and cheese are as hard as the table. Eggs and sausage are cold to touch and taste. The food is overcooked and often hard and difficult to chew. The group said the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer additional food preferences, alternative or optional food choices for two (R117 and R120) residents out of 13, and three of eight cognitively intact residents that participated in an Anonymous Resident Council meeting reviewed for food, potentially resulting in weight loss and dissatisfied dining/nutrition experiences. Findings include: Anonymous Resident Council- On 12/11/25 at 11:00 a.m. an Anonymous Resident Council meeting was held with eight cognitively intact residents. Three of eight residents verbally expressed strong dissatisfaction with food services. Three residents that have concerns with food preferences being honored eat in the dining room. One resident whose family member was present during the meeting stated, My (family member) is on a special diet and cannot eat potatoes or tomatoes due to high potassium and they still give it anyway. I have written on the meal ticket not to give potatoes or tomatoes and handed them to the kitchen staff, and they still put potatoes or tomatoes on my…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint 2681324Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment resulting in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living for residents in the 100, 200, and 300 halls. Findings Include:On 12/8/25, at 10:59 AM, observation of the Ice room on the 200 Hall found an increased accumulation of black debris in the cabinet under the sink. On 12/8/25 at 1:20 PM, observation of the 100 Hall day space found an accumulation of Kleenex and debris stuffed into the side of chair and couch cushions. On 12/8/25 at 2:15 PM, observation of the 300 Hall Clean Utility room found an open wire rack of clean linen with an accumulation of debris, dust, and trash on the floor under the rack. On 12/8/25 at 2:46 PM, observation of the 200 hall shower room found storage racks in both shower stalls with gloves and towels open and exposed to contamination from residents showering. When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to minimize the risk of scalding and burns by allowing domestic hot water to exceed 120 F. This resulted in an increased risk of injury among residents residing in the facility.Findings Include:On 12/8/25 at 1:33 PM, observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] found the hot water in the shower reached a temperature of 126F when tested with a rapid read thermometer. The temperature of the hand sink was 118F at this time and noted to have a point of use mixing valve installed to temper the hot water. On 12/8/25 at 1:38 PM, observation of resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] found hot water from the sinks and showers under the maximum 120F for resident care areas. On 12/8/25 at 2:16 PM, an interview with Maintenance Director (MD) F found that hot water temperatures are maintained between 105F-120F and a sample of rooms are checked every morning in a quantity that allows for all hot water fixtures to be checked monthly. MD F went on to state that all sinks have a point…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow standards of practice for accurate reconciliation of Controlled Medications in three of eight medication carts resulting in the potential for drug diversion. Findings Include:Controlled Medications are substances that have an accepted medical use (medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Schedules II-V), have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence On 12/09/2025 at 11:04 AM inspection of 'Medication Cart - A ' on the 200-hall with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A a review of the Controlled Substance Verification Log revealed it was incomplete. There were no licensed nurse's signatures to verify the Controlled Medications were reconciled for the last 24 hours; on 12/8/25 from the day shift to the night shift and on 12/9/25 from night shift to the day shift. LPN A said, Oh I counted this morning with the night shift nurse, but we forgot to sign the sheet. We should have signed it. LPN A could not say why the night…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R45) out of five residents reviewed for immunizations, was provided an influenza vaccination and education resulting in the potential for the development and spread of influenza among vulnerable residents in the facility. Finding include:On 12/9/2025 at 9:28 AM the Infection Preventionist (IP) J was interviewed and reported (R45) did not have documentation of a current influenza immunization or refusal signed by the guardian. Record Review of R45's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R45 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Psychomotor deficit following Cerebral Infarction (stroke). R45 did not have documentation to indicate that the influenza vaccine was declined by the guardian or was contraindicated. On 12/11/2025 at 8:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and said the expectation was for the guardian to be contacted and get consent or a declination regarding immunizations. Review of the facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI