Medilodge of Sterling Heights
14151 East 15 Mile Road, Sterling Heights, MI 48312 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 248 certified beds · (586) 939-0200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 28% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.9% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.1% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.4% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.7% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.3% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.6% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.5% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.13 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.7%CMS range 23.9–45.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.8%CMS range 9.8–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.1–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 248 beds and averages 210.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake M100150293 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin checks for one (R704) of ten residents reviewed for skin checks, resulting in the development of gangrene of the right great toe, right foot pain and hospitalization. Findings include: Review of intake M100150293 revealed a concern that a family member visited R704 on 12/25/24 during which the resident reported right foot pain. The family member reportedly removed the resident's sock and found the right great toe to have what they believed to be gangrene. Review of the facility record for R704 revealed an admission date of 01/10/24 with diagnoses including Osteoarthritis, Gout, Adult Failure to Thrive, and End Stage Renal Disease requiring Renal Dialysis. Review of R704's Care Plan dated 01/10/24 revealed the Focus statement [R704] is at risk for impaired skin integrity related to muscle weakness, incontinence and a diagnosis of failure to thrive. The Interventions associated with this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for six residents (R46, R56, R101, R116, R156, and R177) of six reviewed for food palatability. Findings include: R56 On 4/12/26 at 9:27 AM during initial tour R56 reported the food is always cold, over cooked, and tough. R56 explained they have reported the food concerns multiple times and nothing changes. R56 continued and stated, when staff are asked to reheat the food, the staff refuses. A review of R56's medical record noted, R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Fractures and Other Multiple Trauma. A review of R56's MDS assessment noted R56 with an intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living by staff. R46 On 4/12/26 at 11:13 AM, R46 reported cold water is not being passed on the weekend and the food is horrible. A review of R46's medical record noted, R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: 04/12/2026 at 8:40 AM, the Ice machine located in the ice machine room next to the conference room was observed with a leak behind the machine. The floor was damp with water, and there was a black mold-like substance on the surface of the floor tiles. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions. (A)PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. On 04/12/2026 between 8:45 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial observation of the kitchen, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, the floor was soiled and sticky. There was an undated pan of cut up pineapple chunks, an undated pan of mixed vegetables and an undated pan of chopped salad. When queried at that time, Manager-In-Training (MIT) T confirmed the items should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for one (R45) of four residents reviewed for sanitary environment. Findings include: On 04/12/2026 at 9:33 AM, R45 was interviewed in their room sitting up in their wheelchair. As the interview concluded R45 transferred from their wheelchair to their bed and laid down. During further observation of the resident's room, it was noted the resident's wheelchair had a folded bed sheet laying over the seat cushion and the sheet had a large stain of what appeared to be liquid brown stool residue. Review of R45's facility record revealed they were admitted into the facility 11/04/24 with diagnoses that included adjustment disorder with Depressed Mood and Other Specified Disorder of the Brain. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had intact cognition and required encouragement and assistance for completion of self-care activities. On 04/13/2026 at 8:54 AM, R45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dressing for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) intravenous (IV) line was changed and dated timely for two residents (R169 and R171) of three residents whose IV sites were observed. Findings include: R169On 04/12/2026 at 11:11 AM, R169 was seated on their bed. R169 reported they had been receiving IV antibiotics daily through their right upper arm PICC line. The transparent dressing over the IV insertion site was soiled black around the edges and was peeling away from the skin at the lower inside edge. R169 was able to lift up the dressing with their fingers. The dressing was dated 03/23/26. A review of R169's record documented R169 had been admitted into the facility on [DATE]. R169 reported the PICC line had been inserted and dated at the hospital. On 04/14/2026 at 7:54 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported PICC line dressings are to be assessed on admission and changed every 24 hours or 72 hours but would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure biologicals were dated when opened and expired medications were discarded in five of six medication carts. Findings include: On 04/13/2026 at 5:58 AM, the biologicals in the 400 hall front medication cart were reviewed with Registered Nurse (RN) C an over-the-counter bottle of meclizine (for motion sickness) with a date opened of 08/10/25 had an expiration date of 01/2026. On 04/13/2026 at 8:37 AM, the biologicals in the 100 hall medication cart were reviewed with RN G. An Anoro (umeclidinium and vilanterol inhalation powder) inhaler for R1 did not have a resident identifier on the inhaler. On 04/13/2026 at 9:05 AM, the biologicals in the 500 hall medication cart were reviewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F, an Advair 250/50 9salmeterol/fluticasone inhaler for R213 was not labeled with the name and date opened on the inhaler and a Trelegy inhaler was not dated when opened on the inhalerOn 04/13/2026 at 9:25 AM, the biologicals in the 600 hall medication cart were reviewed with LPN E. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary tube feeding pole for one (R191) resident of three residents reviewed for environmental concerns. Findings include:On 04/12/2026 at 1:36 PM, R191 was observed in bed and was not responsive to verbal greetings. The resident's tube feeding pole and base of the pole was caked with a dried beige substance. A review of the facility record for R191 revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Gastrostomy Status (requiring nutrition via tube feeding). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R191 required total assistance for completion of self-care activities and the resident's cognition was severely impaired. On 04/14/2026 at 10:01 AM, R191 was observed in bed. They were alert and able to acknowledge the surveyor with head and eye movements but not able to answer interview questions. The tube feeding pole was observed to be in the same condition with a dried beige…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake 2680407 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative therapy services (therapy to prevent or maintain range of motion - ROM) for one resident (R701) of two residents reviewed for ROM.Findings include:On 12/18/25 at 10:00 AM, R701 was observed lying in bed with their feet lying flat on the mattress. When queried, R701 confirmed they had not received consistent restorative therapy this week. A review of R701's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 6/27/25 with diagnoses that included Spinal Stenosis, Multiple Sclerosis and Fibromyalgia. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was alert and oriented x 4 (person, place, time, & situation) and required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers.A review of the physician orders dated 11/17/25 documented the following, Skilled restorative nursing three times a week for 12 weeks as tolerated. A review of the clinical record tasks revealed a 14 day look back for the following task: skilled restorative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0917 — isolatedMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00153957. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a mattress was comfortable and changed timely upon resident request for one resident (R901) of three reviewed for a room furnishings. Findings include: On 07/01/25 at 8:17 AM, R901 was queried about a concern with uncomfortable mattresses. R901 reported the mattress feels like it has a hole in it and it feels like they are sitting on the frame of the bed. R901 further reported the mattress has been that way since they were admitted about six months ago. R901 also reported they had told different staff over the last six months and it had yet to be changed out. On 07/01/25 at 11:29 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D reported R901 had told them the mattress was uncomfortable at different times over the last four to five months and had reported it to the nurse because they were the ones who could put it in the maintenance needs reporting system (TELS). On07/01/25 at 12:11 PM, R901 was observed to be dressed and seated in a wheelchair dressed at the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake M100151122: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the fall of one (R705) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R705 revealed an original admission date of 07/30/13 and a most recent admission of 08/22/17 with diagnoses including Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, Spinal Stenosis, and Muscle Weakness. The record indicated R705 is receiving hospice services. On 04/14/25 at 12:40 PM, R705 was interviewed in their room. During the conversation regarding care concerns the resident stated I wanted to tell you I fell off the bed last Monday. The hospice aide was changing me and I rolled off the bed. When it happened I had some pain in my neck so they tried to X-ray my neck but they weren't able to. R705 indicated the X-ray couldn't be completed properly due to positioning difficulties. The resident denied any residual pain and stated I'm just a little sore but I always feel that. When asked if they felt safe receiving care R705 stated, as long as there are two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for nine residents (R6, R21, R22, R24, R60, R74, R108, R146, R188) and six confidential group residents, of sixteen residents reviewed for food palatability. Findings include: R188 On 3/10/25 at 10:44 AM, R188 was interviewed about the palatability of the food at the facility and indicated the food was, lousy and frequently cold. A review of R188's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R188 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Partial amputation on left mid foot and COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (Lung disease). R188's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R188 had an intact cognition. R108 On 3/10/25 at 10:56 AM, R108 was interviewed about the palatability of the food at the facility and stated, I don't like the food. A review of R108's EMR revealed R108 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dish machine area in the kitchen in a clean manner, resulting in the presence of gnats. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. Findings include: On 03/10/25 at 9:15 AM, there were numerous gnats observed underneath the dish machine tank and drainboard. The flooring was wet with murky standing water, and the pipes underneath the drainboard were coated with a black slimy substance. When queried about the gnats, Dietary Manager S provided no explanation. Review of the pest control service reports noted: 8/20/24 Upon inspection of the kitchen it was found there was heavy gnat activity. The cause of the gnat activity is the cleanliness in the kitchen. Areas all around and underneath dish tank were so soiled with debris that they were creating harboring spaces for gnats. 9/20/24 Upon inspecting the kitchen, many gnats were present. Kitchen staff must do a better job of cleaning. 1/15/25 Upon inspection of the kitchen there was heavy gnat activity. This is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for five residents (R34, R86, R147, R612, and R613) of six residents reviewed for call light accessibility. Findings include: R612 On 3/10/25 at 1:10 PM, R612's call light was observed out of reach of R612 and on the floor. On 3/12/25 at 10:55 AM, [NAME] Clerk (WC) P was observed in R612's room and was interviewed regarding the preferred location of the call light for R612. WC P stated, It should be within hand reach. A review of R612's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R612 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End stage renal disease (Damaged kidney) and Type 2 diabetes. R612's most recent minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R612 had an intact cognition and required moderate assistance to supervision for all activities of daily living (ADLs). R613 On 3/10/25 at 2:32 PM, R613's call light was observed on the floor by the end of their bed. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00150763. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete an investigation for an allegation of abuse for one (R2) of two resident reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of the Intake reported to the State Agency noted an allegation that staff in the facility failed to treat the resident with dignity and respect (on 2/27/25). On 3/11/25, R2 was observed sitting in their room looking at their computer tablet. R2 did not recall the alleged incident or staff who cared for him on 2/27/25. A review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, delusional disorders, and mild intellectual disabilities. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Brief Interview of Mental status score of 1 which indicated severely impaired cognition. On 3/12/25 at 9:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Maintenance Director (MD) I .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual PASARR (Preadmission Screen and Resident Review) for two residents (R70 and R139) of 6 residents reviewed for PASARR screening. Findings include: R70 A review of R70's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagial, intellectual disabilities, functional quadriplegia. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of R70 electronic medical record revealed a PASARR dated 11/27/24 and marked Preadmission screening and revealed no level II PASAAR request. R139 On 03/10/25 at 10:00 AM, R139 was observed lying in bed and watching television. R139 was finishing his breakfast meal. R139 verbalized concerns about wanting to meet with the social worker to discuss change in guardianship. A review of R139's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan addressing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for one resident(R62) out of three reviewed for mood/behavior care plans. Findings include: A review of the medial record revealed R62 was admitted into the facility on 6/13/2022 with the following medical diagnoses, Major Depressive Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). A review of the most recent Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) set revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. On 3/10/2025 at 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with R62. R62 stated they do have PTSD due to things in their past. R62 stated they have triggers, but the medicine helps manage it. Further review of the medical record revealed a mood/behavior care plan. The mood/behavior care plan did not include the PTSD diagnosis or known triggers. On 3/12/2025 at 10:13 AM, an interview was conducted with Social Worker (SW) F. SW F stated when they assess the resident when they admit into the facility it should be added…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance for two residents (R24, R154) out of six reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings include: R24 On 3/10/25 at 10:27 AM, R24 reported over the past weekend Saturday (3/8/25) into Sunday (3/9/25) they requested ADL care around 6:15 AM, no one on the midnight shift came in to provide care. They explained they received care on the day shift at 9:45 AM. R24 explained on another (unknown) day they put the light on around 7:00 PM on a Friday, and did not receive care until 9:30 PM. A review of R24's medical record revealed, R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction. A review of R24's annual Minimium Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] noted, R24 with an intact cognition and required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLs). Further review of R24's concern forms provided by the facility noted, multiple days of staff not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely podiatry care was provided for one resident (R201) of one resident reviewed for foot care. Findings include: On 03/10/25 at 9:00 AM, R201 was observed sitting on the side of the bed. When asked about any concerns, R201 stated they are concerned about their toenails because they are too long and starting to hurt. R201 toenails were observed to be long extending past the tip of the toes. R201 could not recall the last podiatry visit. A review of R201's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Down's syndrome, Schizophrenia, and Chronic kidney disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Further review of R201's elcetronic medical record did not reveal a current podiatry consultation. On 3/11/25 at 2:00 PM, an interview occured with the Social Service Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date a tube feeding bottle for one resident (R75) out of two reviewed for tube feedings. Findings include: On 3/11/2025 at 10:24 AM, R75 was observed laying in bed. R75 was observed to have a tube feeding running. The bottle was noted to be unlabeled and undated. On 3/11/2025 at 10:24 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was brought into the room and shown the tube feeding bottle. LPN A stated the tube feeding goes up on the evening shift, and that it should be labeled. A review of the medical record revealed that R75 was admitted into the facility on 6/10/2024 with the following diagnoses, Quadriplegia and Gastrostomy. A review of the recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99 indicating they were unable to complete the assessment. R75 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. On 3/12/2025 at 1:24 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the tube feeding goes up at night and that the tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were discarded when expired from one medication cart (U100 low numbers) of three medication carts reviewed. Findings include: On 3/12/2025 at 02:07 PM, along with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G, two expired stock medications were located in the top drawer of Unit 100's lower numbered medication cart. The medications were Glucosamine Chrondroitin with an open date of 10/1/24 and a stamped expiration date of 01/25 and Oyster Shell Calcium 500mg (milligrams) with an open date of 9/25/24 and a stamped expiration date of 08/24. On 3/12/2025 at 04:15 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated expired medications should be removed from use. A policy for Medication Storage was requested but not received by the end of the survey.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment (two beside dressers, one overbed table) was in good, clean, and safe condition for three residents (R20, R143, R167) of residents reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include: On 03/10/25 at 09:55 AM an observation of the bedside dresser for R20 revealed a two-inch gap between the first and second drawer. R20 was queried regarding the gap and responded, oh without further verbalization. On 03/12/25 a review of the record revealed R20 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. R26 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 03/10/25 at 10:10 AM, an observation revealed the overbed table for R143 had many dark circular stains. R143 was asked if they found the condition of the overbed table bothersome. R143 provided a blank stare and did not respond at all. On 03/12/25 a review of the record revealed R143 was admitted [DATE] with a diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertians to Intakes MI00149291, MI00149568, and MI00149398. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care, repositioning or water was provided for three dependent residents (R703, R706, and R707) of three reviewed for Activites of Daily Living (ADL) care. Findings include: R703 and R707 On 01/22/25 at 8:52 AM, R707 reported they did not have any water and had been left an extended amount of time waiting to be assisted with incontinence care. R707 had finished their breakfast. On 01/22/25 at 8:55 AM, R703 was observed to be in bed. A wedge was visible at the right side of the torso. The resident verbalized concerns about being changed (providing care) timely in the after dinner hours. R703 reported they had not been turned since earlier in the morning and was supposed to be turned every two hours. The resident was able to read the clock in the room. The time stated by R703 was correct. R703 reported the breakfast tray had been removed and noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00147415 and MI00147559. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms, common areas, and shower rooms were homelike on two nursing units (units 100 and 200) of four units reviewed. Findings include: A review of the intake dated 10/18/24 revealed, .bathroom had no working lights, and the piping underneath the sink was not attached to the sink . It was also noted there was a burnt outlet in the room. A further comment noted, staff were asked to switch bed to a pressure release bed, but staff did not switch it until the last day . and .there are sharp metal objects sticking out the floor in the hallway . On 10/22/24 at 9:21 AM, the main hall to the 100 and 200 units was noted to have a round metal disc in the center of the hallway outside the main dining room. The disc was held down with a screw in the center. The edges of the disc were bent upwards above the level of the floor and the disc was loose when stepped on. A piece of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00145616. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement actions to prevent repeated falls for one (R703) of one resident resulting in nine falls without goals and interventions to prevent further falls. Findings include: On 7/30/2024 st 10:57 AM, phone contact with the complainant was attempted. A voicemail was left when the call was unanswered. A return call was not received. On 4/18/2024, R703 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after falling and sustaining a fractured left wrist and left femur prior to admission. Other pertinent diagnoses include, dementia, heart disease, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. R703's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) documented a 9 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 7/30/2024 a facility record review revealed R703 experienced falls on the following dates, 4/19/2024, 4/20/24, 5/1/2024, 5/2/2024, 5/1/2024. 5/24/2024, 5/29/2024, 6/12/2024, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains in part to intake #145421. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for three residents (R704, R705, R706 ) of three reviewed for food palatability, resulting in dissatisfaction during meals. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the state agency (SA) revealed the following, Complainant states the food is terrible .The complainant(s) state they have to spend their own money on food and they can't afford it. On 7/30/24 at 12:40 PM, the surveyor taste tested a random lunch meal and the results revealed that the cheeseburger and fries were [NAME] warm, the [NAME] slaw lacked flavor, and the pickle spear was soggy. All of these issues had a negative impact upon the palatability of the meal. On 7/30/24 at 2:25 PM, Dietary Manager (DM) B was interviewed regarding preferred food temperatures for meals to the residents and stated, Hot food should be hot and cold food should be cold.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0920 — isolatedProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This pertains to Intake MI00145962. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain adequate lighting in one (East Dining Room) of two dining rooms reviewed for homelike environment. Findings Include: On 7/30/2024 at 10:30 AM, during an interview with R701 they said the East Dining Room lights had been out for some time. They further revealed staff had been made aware and were very frustrated with the maintenance in the facility. On 7/30/2024 observation was made regarding lighting in the East Dining Room. It was observed that 5 lights were not illuminated. With the assistance of the Activities Director, the surveyors tried all switches controlling the lights without success. On 7/30/2024 at 1:20 pm, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) indicated staff have the ability to enter into their maintenance system and was unaware of the lights being out until the Activities Director notified them. The NHA indicated maintenance requests need to go through the electronic maintenance request system. The policy, Preventative Maintenance Program, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This pertains to Intake MI00145962. Based on based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain steam tables in a sanitary condition in one of three steam tables in the East Dining Room. Findings Include: On 7/30/2024 at 11:20 am, an observation was made of the steam tables in the East Dining Room. While observing the condition and cleanliness of the steam tables, loose crusted material and mold was noted on the third steam table with a small hood. When the material was touched, it fell onto the area where food would be sitting when in use. On 7/30/2024 at 12:35 pm, The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was shown the area of concern and indicated their expectation is the steam table hoods should be clean and free of mold and materials that could drop into food. The cleaning policy for cleaning steam table hoods was requested and received, Cleaning and Sanitizing Training by (name of cleaning company). The training document revealed Cleaning and sanitizing properly is one of the most important things we continually do in our kitchens to keep our…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00144848. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment for two residents (R701 and R705 ) of three reviewed for environment, resulting in feelings of anger and frustration. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the state agency (SA) revealed the following, There is bugs in room, there is black mold or oil leaking from the air conditioner on the floor both the roommate and [complainant] are not getting any help to get it fixed . On 6/12/24 at 11:55 AM, R705 was met in their room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) and interviewed about the room environment. R705 stated, Look at the carpet by the air conditioner, black stuff comes out of the air conditioner and there are black stains on the rug. R705 further indicated there were Pincher bugs that Pinch seen. R705 proceed to show the surveyor pictures on their phone of bugs which they indicated had been identified in their room. R705 indicated this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143948. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify guardian of transferring out to the hospital for one (909) of two residents reviewed for notification of changes resulting in the guardian not being informed of resident's condition. Findings include A record review of R909's medical record revealed, R909 was admited on 9/04/15 with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Acute Kidney Failure, and Hypertension. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted, R909's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. On 5/07/24, a record review of R909's medical record revealed on 11/28/2023 at 12:00 a note stated,Writer was rounding on unit and approached resident's bedside, resident was found to be tachypneic on room air. Initiated oxygen immediately via nasal cannula at 8liters per minute . (Medical Doctor)MD was called, orders to have (Nurse Practitioner)NP at bedside and administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the ventilation covers in a clean manner, failed to maintain the ice machine rooms in a sanitary manner, and failed to ensure resident food items were labeled, dated and discarded when expired. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food. Findings include: On 1/30/24 at 8:55 AM, the ceiling/wall ventilation covers located by the dish machine, by the steam table, and near the ice machine, were observed with a buildup of dust. When queried, Dietary Manager D stated that Maintenance was responsible for cleaning the vents. On 1/30/24 at 9:15 AM, in the 200 unit refrigerator utilized for the storage of resident food items brought in from the outside, there were 2 undated food containers. When queried, Dietary Manager D confirmed the food items should have been dated, and further stated that the resident refrigerators were monitored by nursing staff. On 1/30/24 at 9:25 AM, in the 500/600 unit resident refrigerator, there was a container with moldy noodles dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00141058. Based on observation, Interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for three residents (R167, R230, and R279) of six residents reviewed for food palatability and twelve anonymous group members, resulting in dissatisfaction during meals. Findings include: R167 On 1/30/24 at 11:32 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R167 was interviewed regarding food palatability at the facility and stated, The food is cold and doesn't taste good. On 1/30/24 at 2:00 PM, a review of R167's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Fracture of ribs and Quadriplegia (Paralysis of all four limbs). R167's most recent quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that R167 had an intact cognition. R279 On 1/30/24 at 11:56 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R279 was interviewed regarding food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a toilet was maintained in working condition for one resident (R136) of three reviewed for clean, comfortable, homelike conditions, resulting in resident dissatisfaction with living conditions. Findings include: On 1/30/24 at 9:01 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R136 was interviewed about their satisfaction with the care and services that they were receiving at the facility. R136 stated, My toilet doesn't flush. It hasn't flushed in three weeks. It has overflown. R136 expressed dissatisfaction with the functioning of the toilet in their room and further indicated that maintenance has unplugged their toilet, but it gets plugged up again frequently and on a consistent basis. On 1/30/24 at 9:02 AM, urine was observed in R136's toilet and when the toilet was flushed it did not completely drain. On 1/31/24 at 2:13 PM, a follow up visit was conducted with R136 in their room and R136 was asked if their toilet was flushing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for one (R38) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 01/30/24 at 10:13 AM, R38 reported that R60 stuck their hand down the front of their (R38's) blouse twice. R38 stated They (staff) came and talked to me about it. It just happened two or three days ago. Review of the facility record for R38 revealed an admission date of 04/19/23 with diagnoses that included Left Hip Osteoarthritis with Left Hip Replacement, Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder and Depression. The 10/24/23 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. Further review of R38's record revealed a progress note dated 01/25/24 authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A stating Resident stated resident of room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 put [their] finger down [their] shirt into [their] breast area. Resident did not sustain any injuries during event. Writer contact Admin (NHA), DON (Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report a sexual abuse allegation for one (R38) of seven residents reviewed. Findings include: On 01/30/24 at 10:13 AM, R38 reported that R60 stuck their hand down the front of their (R38's) blouse twice. R38 stated They (staff) came and talked to me about it. It just happened two or three days ago. Review of the facility record for R38 revealed an admission date of 04/19/23 with diagnoses that included Left Hip Osteoarthritis with Left Hip Replacement, Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder and Depression. The 10/24/23 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. Further review of R38's record revealed a progress note dated 01/25/24 authored by LPN A stating Resident stated resident of 517-2 put [their] finger down [their] shirt into [their] breast area. Resident did not sustain any injuries during event. Writer contact Admin (NHA), DON (Director of Nursing), and MD (physician) to report occurrence. Pain and Skin assessment performed. No change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening (PAS)/Annual Resident Review (ARR) Mental Illness/Intellectual Disability/Related Conditions Identification was completed timely and sent to the local community mental health (CMH) for a level II OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993) evaluation for one resident (R135) of one resident reviewed for PASARRs. Findings include: A review of R135's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 7/13/23 with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemipresis, Dysphagia, Depression, Anxiety, and Diabetes. Further review revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required 1-2 person assistance for Activites of Daily Living. Further review of R135's medical record revealed that a PASARR was completed on 4/28/23 by the acute care setting that referred the resident to the facility. On 2/1/24 at 9:48 AM, all of R135's PASARRs were requested from the facility, however the only documentation received was the 4/28/23 PASAAR, and an exemption form completed by the acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions to prevent falls, and skin breakdown, for two sampled residents (R118 and R135) of seven residents reviewed for person centered comprehensive care plans. Findings include: R118 On 1/31/24 at 10:12 AM, R118 was observed in bed feet lying flat on the mattress, bed not in its lowest position. Attempts to interview R118 were unsuccessful as the resident was pleasantly confused. A review of R118's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 5/21/21 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Dysphagia. Further review of R118's medical record revealed that they required 1-2-person assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of R118's medical record revealed the following care plans: Resident is at risk for impaired skin integrity related to confined to a bed all or most of the time r/t (related to) decreased mobility. Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00141406 and MI00141058. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the preferred bathing method and frequency for one (R78) of seven residents reviewed for bathing. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R78 revealed an admission date of 08/21/23 with diagnoses that included Liver Contusion/Laceration, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Bipolar Disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R78 required maximum assistance for bathing. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. On 01/30/24 at 10:43 AM, R78 reported they had not received a shower in about three weeks. R78 stated When I ask for a shower they say they can only do a bed bath or they say they can't because they don't have towels. I've had about four showers and four bed baths since I came here at the end of August. R78 indicated that they were scheduled for a shower for that afternoon. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services per therapy recommendation for one of one resident (R132) reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: On 1/30/24 at 12:55 PM, was observed eating lunch with their left hand as their right hand was contracted. There were no observations of any interventions in place for R132's contracture. Attempts to interview R132 were unsucessful as they smiled and ate their lunch. A review of R132's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 8/5/21 with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, and Vascular Dementia. Further review of R132's medical record revealed that the resident had a moderately impaired cognition, and required one person assistance for Activities of Daily Living. A review of R132's Occupational Therapy discharge recommendations dated 12/27/23 revealed the following, .Discharge Recommendations: Recommend RNP (restorative nursing program) for Contracture management. Restorative Program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen and tracheostomy (a surgical opening into the neck to allow for breathing) care, for one resident (R429) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. Findings include: On 1/30/24 at 10:03 AM, R429 was observed lying in bed with a tracheostomy collar on with oxygen attached. The oxygen concentrator read 7 Liters. On 1/31/24, at 3:50 PM, R429 was observed lying in bed without being hooked up to their oxygen. Nurse E was asked about R429. Nurse E entered the room and reconnected the oxygen concentrator. Nurse E checked the resident's oxygen and reported that the pulse oximeter was at 86% (normal range between 95-100%). R429 was asked how long they had been without their oxygen, and stated, I returned from dialysis at around 2:15 PM and was put in the bed. On 2/1/24 at 8:28 AM, R429 was observed lying in bed with their tracheostomy collar on with the oxygen concentrator on at 7 liters. The resident was asked about their use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and provided timely for one resident (R230) of one whose medications were reviewed resulting in expression of poorly controlled pain. Findings include: On 01/30/24 at 12:28 PM, R230 reported that they had entered the facility on a Friday afternoon and and through a series of room changes due to uncooperative roommates ended up in the cold lobby until they received a room late in the morning the next day. R230 reported that during their first four days they did not receive any pain medication and reported rib and leg pain. It was also reported they were to have oxygen at night and it had not been set up. R230 further noted the bed in the room was in need of repair. R230 reported a nurse noted they had to cover two nursing units which were not close together and was not seen by a member of the medical staff until that following Monday. R230 noted they were also on heart medication. A review of the medical record for R230 revealed, R230 was admitted into the facility on Friday 01/19/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a 14-day stop date on an anti-anxiety medication for two (R26, and R135) of seven residents reviewed. Findings include: R26 Review of the facility record for R26 revealed an admission date of 05/14/23 with diagnoses that included Chronic Osteomyelitis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R26 required total to maximum assistance with activities of daily living and the presence of moderate cognitive impairment. On 2/1/24 review of R26's active physician orders revealed an order dated 12/27/23 for Ativan Oral Tablet 0.5 milligram (MG): Give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for anxiety. Additional review of R26's record revealed no documentation of justification for continuing the Ativan order. R135 A review of R135's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 7/13/23 with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Dysphagia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store/label/discard expired medications for (a) one (500/600 unit) of three medication storage rooms, (b) two (200 unit and 700 unit) of four medication carts reviewed and (c) two of two refrigerators reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 1/30/24 at 11:13 AM, the 500/600 medication storage room was inspected with Unit Manager, Registered Nurse (RN) H and the results were the following: -A vial of Lantus (Diabetes insulin) 100 ml (milliliter)/unit with no name on it was observed in the medication cupboard in the medication storage room; -A bottle of Guaifensin (Expectorant medication) 400 mg (milligrams) with an expiration date of 11/23 was also observed. RN H was interviewed about the expired vial of insulin in the cupboard and stated, It should be refrigerated. RN H was further interviewed about the expired medication and did not directly answer the question. On 1/31/24 at 1:25 PM, the 200 unit medication cart was inspected with RN I present and the results were the following: -Two inhalers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This ciation pertains to Intake: MI00141406 and MI00141058. Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facilty failed to ensure that resident call lights were functioning properly for one resident (R79 ) of five residents reviewed for call lights, resulting in feelings of frustration. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:20 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R79 was interviewed regarding their level of satisfaction with the care and services they were receiving at the facility. R79 expressed frustration related to long call light wait times. R79 indicated that they currently needed their pillows adjusted and R79 activated their call light while the Surveyor was present in their room. A small red light went on next to R79's bed when the call light was activated. On [DATE] at 9:21 AM until 9:40 AM, multiple staff members were observed to walk back and forth in the hallway passing R79's room without answering the resident's call light. On [DATE] at 9:41 AM, the Surveyor exited R79's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00141632, MI00138084, and MI00137973. Based on interview the facility failed to ensure the responsible party was informed of a change in condition for one of two residents (R918) reviewed for a change in condition, resulting in lack of knowledge about a decline and or change in the resident's condition and the potential for a delay in advanced treatment. Findings include: A review of the record for R918 revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/13/23. Diagnoses included Sepsis, Bacteremia (systemic infection), Gastroenteritis (Stomach/Bowel inflammation/infection), Ascites (build up of fluid in the abdomen) and Dependence on Dialysis. A skilled nursing note dated 12/13/23 indicated R918 was alert to name and place but not to time and date. A review of a progress note by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J dated 12/13/2023 at 7:12 AM revealed, .resident had a large projectile emesis at approx 0400. vitals are stable. resident has had no further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00138087. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented and documented to prevent falls for one of three residents (R903) whose falls were reviewed. Findings include: On 12/18/23 at 9:53 AM and on 12/19/23 at 7:48 AM R903 was observed to be standing in the doorway of the bathroom. On 12/19/23 at 10:58 AM, the therapy treatment notes for R903 were reviewed with the Therapy Director. It was reported that the root cause for many of R903's falls a lack of safety awareness, not calling for help and not able to follow safety instructions given even with in context reminders such as remembering to lock the wheelchair before standing. The Therapy Director reported R903 could stand by themselves, but should not. A review of the record for R903 revealed that R903 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include Syncope (fainting) and Collapse, Hemiplegia (weakness on one side), Mild Cognitive Impairment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00138118, MI00138025 and MI00137992. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care (ADLS) for dependent residents for one of seven residents (R905) reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: On 12/18/23 at 9:00 AM, documentation was reviewed from a complaint received by the State Agency from [Hospital Representative] which indicated, [R905] had a strong foul odor to them .[R905] had to be cleaned up once they arrived to the [Emergency Room]. On 12/19/23 at 10:30 AM, a review of R905's electronic medical record (EMR)/shower documentation during their last stay at the facility from 10/26/23 through 11/28/23 revealed that R905 had no shower documentation observed in their record and no record of shower/bath refusals. Review of R905's EMR revealed that R905 was scheduled to receive their showers on, Thursday and Sunday day shift. Prefers showers. Further review of R905's EMR revealed that R905 was most recently admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00141644. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document vital signs for one of one sampled resident (R919) reviewed for professional standards, resulting in inaccurate vital sign recording. Findings include: A review of the Intake noted, On 12/15/2023 at 7:55pm [R919] was not breathing and without a pulse when the [Local] Fire Department arrived at the facility. [R919] had blood pooling on [their] back, lividity (bluish-purple discoloration of skin after death). [R919] was in rigor mortis and was cool to the touch and [R919] pupils were affixed . A review of the Patient Care Report by the local ambulance service that arrived to pick R919 for their scheduled discharge noted, Call Demographics. Incident Location: (Nursing Home) . Reason for leaving Nursing Home: Discharge to home . Misc (miscellaneous) Call Info . Reason for Ambulance? Dead on Scene . Response Information. Complaint Reported by Dispatch: Sick Person. Response Mode to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00141632 and MI00138087. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an air mattress was in place, and or reposition a resident timely and or document wound care as completed for three residents (R922, R904, R918) of three reviewed for pressure ulcer care, resulting in the potential for decreased wound healing. Findings include: R922 On 12/18/231:15 R922 was observed to be in bed. R922 appeared to be on their back in bed despite a foam wedge on the left side. A visitor in the room reported they had been with the resident since around 11:30 AM and the staff had not repositioned R922. The visitor reported that the staff were attending to R922's wounds but the facility had yet to place the air mattress on R922's bed and the resident had been at the facility for two weeks since returning from the hospital. The visitor further noted R922 to be a long-term resident and that R922 had the mattress in their other room prior to discharge to the hospital. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00140698. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (R903, R911, R921, and R923) of four residents reviewed for dietary services, received meals according to their preferences. Findings include: A review of R921's medical record revealed, R921 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Acute Respiratory failure. A review of R921's [NAME] Data Set (MDS) assessment noted, R921 with an intact cognition. On 12/18/23 at 10:17 AM, R921 was asked about the food at the facility and stated, I get a lot of pasta and I'm diabetic. I don't eat it because I know I can't have that many carbs. A lot of rice and ravioli. The broccoli is mushy and cold. R921 was asked if they are able to preview the menu and then select. R921 stated, No. R921 also stated, I'm allergic to nuts and tuna but I get them both on my tray. I had a care conference and said no bread, I keep getting it. R921 was observed to pointed out that the HS snack for last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00138084. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure rooms were cleaned appropriately and beds were in good condition for two room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 and 716-1 resulting in the potential for resident disatisfaction with their rooms and lingering debris on the floor. Findings include: On 12/18/23 at 10:24 AM, 1:03 PM and 3:36 PM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a metal fork under the center area of the bed. On 12/19/23 at 7:55 AM and 10:36 AM, the fork remained under the bed. On 12/18/23 at 12:57 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER] piles of different sized pieces of sheet rock and sheet rock dust were observed on the floor below vertical gouges in the sheetrock behind the head of the first bed. A visitor commented that it had been that way for months and had not been cleaned up. On 12/19/23 at 10:32 AM, it was noted that the sheet rock dust remained and two of the four wheels at the foot of the first bed were broken and the wheel trucks rested on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00137875. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a stool (bowel movement) sample, initiate a new wound treatment timely, adequately document nursing assessment and monitor edema/swelling, affecting one resident (R003) of three reviewed for quality of care, resulting in decreased coordination of care and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: A review of R003's record revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on 5/5/23 and discharged on 7/1/23. R003's medical diagnoses included Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack), Diabetes, Lung Disease, Muscle Weakness, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Malignant Neoplasm Of Uterus and Colon (Cancer). A review of R003's record revealed that the resident began having loose stools on 5/27/23 that persisted through 5/30/23. A Physician Progress note dated 5/30/23 indicated that a stool sample was to be collected to test for C. Diff (Clostridioides difficile - an infection of the large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MEDILODGE — 53 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 52 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 52; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIFTEENINONE OPCO GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/24/2013 |
| B&Y HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/24/2013 |
| B&Y TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/24/2013 |
| CODY HEALTHCARE S CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/24/2013 |
| CRAIG FLASHNER 2007 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/24/2013 |
| NORCROSS, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/24/2013 |
| ROGERS, STACEY | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/20/2014 |
| KIRK, KRISTINE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/24/2013 |
| PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| FLASHNER, CRAIG | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/24/2013 |
| PERLSTEIN, YITZCHOK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/24/2013 |
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $5.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235263. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.